[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: real-life-judy.jpg (402 KB, 2560x2177)
402 KB JPG
AI will fuck 50% of jobs off the market.
I'm currently studying physics but I think I will drop out.
>anon you're just lazy, lookin for excuses
Nah man, been thinking about this a lot. All you have in life is time and energy and you have to consider how to spend them wisely.
I will not take student debt and live in poverty for 5 years so I can get a degree that will amount to nothing in 2030.
We currently live in a fucked up scenario where
>young people are told to study to study professions that will not exist when they graduate
>governments are quickly removing all welfare plans knowing full well that people wont have jobs in the future: a plan to kill 50% of the population

They're killing us, anons. I should be thinking of how to survive this mass genocide, not focus on distractions like le skool.
Only people who make money online like beatemups and pewdiepie will survive.
>>
Most people have relatively little idea of what's coming and they're years off base with their estimations of AI tech. They've likely spoken over the phone with a fully realistic AI agent at this point and not realized it.

The most cognitively loaded task that exists, long form totally novel mathematics proofs on conjectures that were resistant to the best human mathematicians for decades, were surpassed a month or two ago.

Sure, LLMs have funny quirks and make mistakes, but the need for human employees is shrinking rapidly and only about 1% of jobs are needed long term.
>>
File: b7ca4f2fb7737566-large.jpg (446 KB, 1440x1080)
446 KB JPG
>>84885734
You're right but can you tell me how to prepare for what's to come?
What should I do? Become a nomad and live off my van? Because that's what I'm currently doing. I don't think society will just magically collapse overnight, but I have this weird feeling that prepping for survival isn't the worst choice to make.
We couldn't even predict covid-19 until it was too late, I'll never make that mistake again.
>>
To speak on your idea a bit as well, content creators are going to go as well. Fully realistic long form videos are already possible with open source models. A $1k computer could generate endless fully realistically voiced videos of PewDiePie. It's totally and inescapably over
>>
>>84885742
It's fine to prep for survival and even to try and break into a normal life. You'll want a small community to help you survive if things go south. Nobody can say how far away each profession is from being replaced, but the tech to replace all office and intellectual professions now exists.
>>
>>84885744
>>84885749

What saddens me about AI is that it's replacing all the best and most cushy jobs.
What it will never replace is an Indian who will mop floors for a dollar an hour.
And that's what I'll be competing against in job interviews.
>>
>>84885749
>the tech to replace all office and intellectual professions now exists.

Boomers truly had the best life a human could live.
My parents and grandparents literally just moved files from a folder to another and made six figures doing it.
This will never repeat in the history of humanity.
>>
>>84885757
Yeah there were videos showing Indian workers recording their work recently and people were commenting that they're unconcerned but it's just preliminary training for high paying jobs outside India to see if it can be done. The places where wages are highest have the highest incentive for automation.

You won't be competing against it. You won't even be called to interview.
>>
>>84885763
No it won't but the question is now which nation will have the strength to rally for some sort of regular provisioning based off the liberation from labor and massive productivity increases provided by recent developments. I think there will be a rough adaptation period with a lot of suffering.
>>
>>84885780
> I think there will be a rough adaptation period with a lot of suffering.

About 5 years ago I realized I was born just in the right time to experience an era where the average man will never have sex or make a cent of money.
I'm sure I'll spend my entire life just looking at screens and fighting over madeup matters like gender minorities. Not because I want to, but because that's all they gave me.
>>
>>84885809
You will more than likely be fighting for survival. Culture war issues like race and gender identity will not be front burner issues when multigenerational homes when only a single lucky male employee supporting everyone become the norm for wealthy nations as is the case in most poor nations and has been forever. The available depths of poverty which exist as possible outcomes are absolutely brutal.
>>
>>84885749
>You'll want a small community to help you survive
That's basically the essence of what a society is, and why the problem of human capital being outpaced by technology shouldn't inherently be a problem. The problem of unfairness in a system that unironically used to be quite adequately fair should be looked into.

>>84885763
>Boomers truly had the best life a human could live.
They also sold everyone out for the best payout imaginable in human history. We can't really say for sure what will happen because we don't know if when Gen X/Millennials formally succeed the boomers they will continue the grift. Since the boomers are quite solipsistic, they will probably try to take their wealth with them, and there will probably not be anything for them to continue. It will just be rubble but with a society that bitterly remembers what it was like to not have ladders for themselves, or to have them pulled up.
>>
>>84885837
It certainly should be investigated but at that point we are looking at likely wealth redistribution in the form of productive means or at least the goods those means produce like foodstuffs. And then you get into the likely resistance of the haves against the have nots. It will take a considerate person from the haves group to effect peaceable solutions.
>>
We need communism, unironically.
We've been indoctrinated since birth to shun the term communism but that's just because it's in the best interest of capitalism to do so.
>>
>>84885744
>content creators are going to go as well

Good. Fuckin hate those guys. I can't believe people made millions just talking to a camera.
>>
>>84885872
People aren't shy for communism, they are feeling politically helpless and they are averse to forcible means of securing guarantees for legitimate reasons. Call the end goals anything palatable and you'll elicit support but the means to the ends are not there.
>>
>>84885713
the market has been tightening for like 3 years because funny orange man shenanigans.
while companies are finding ways to be more efficient with AI shit, they're grossly exaggerating it in their statements to sustain their stock price while they pucker their fking arseholes.
Less data centers are going to be built out, 'vibe coding' is getting more expensive, and every year it seems more like nvidia is going to walk with the whole cake while all the shitter big dick AI companies have more debt than they know what to do with.
job market is gay and shit, but i'm very hesitant on accepting that a huge portion is genuinely due to the effectiveness of current AI solutions.
>>
>>84885713
You can't find jobs not because of AI but because all jobs were shipped overseas.
>China's labor force participation rate for men aged 15-64 is approximately 80%
AI is powerless to take their jobs.
>>
>>84885872
You already get communism with AI data centers building. Central committee direct recources as they please
>but what about me!!!!
Central committee is not interested in you. Enjoy your communism.
>>
>>84885906
This is all factually incorrect unfortunately.
>>
>>84885939
which part? the 3 years part? sorry ~2.5 years
>>
>>84885918

Globalization ruined jobs and getting laid.
>employers can now outsource any job to a Chinese or Indian slave
>woman can now talk to a hotter guy overseas
>>
>>84885918
>>84885942
Incorrect, unfortunately. Politically motivated head in sand stuff. I know it's uncomfortable, but honesty is central to understanding. Trying to frame everything in a way that is comfortable from your political perspective is an inherently dishonest goal. The best filter in these conversations is to compel those who disagree with the capacity of current tech to attempt a simple real analysis epsilon delta proof just to check if they have a basic enough math proficiency to make an honest estimation of the techs ability. It's a simple ask for those with college level math skills in a real sense, but only about 1% of human beings are able.
>>
>>84885734
>The proof came from a new general-purpose reasoning model, rather than from a system trained specifically for mathematics,
Grim. STEM is dead.
>>84885906
>>84885918
True!
>>84885713
>a plan to kill 50% of the population
If you aren't religious this isn't a bad outcome. My only hope is that governments offer voluntary euthanasia. Otherwise the rope awaits...
>>
>>84885966

>tell people to reproduce a lot so we'll get work force
>10 years later AI emerges
>"oh sorry, there are too many of you, just go die"

Rofl.
>>
>>84885965
Anon, *American* high school calculus classes teach the epsilon-delta proof on the first day. Taking a real analysis or topology or whatever bullshit math course in your degree doesn't make you the sole arbiter of good discourse. Return to Plebbit.
>>
File: sdfgdfgfdgdfgfdgd.png (286 KB, 1140x1130)
286 KB PNG
>>84885965
here i made something for you
feel free to engage with what i actually said. idk wtf you're on about honestly.
>>
>>84886000
He's saying that people who haven't taken introductory college-level math courses aren't entitled to hold an educated opinion on AI and current technology.
>>
>>84885966
Well a general purpose model would excell at mathematics before anything else since mathematics is just numbers and you can 100% check whether an answer is right or wrong. No other discipline is that simple.

>>84885713
You're completely correct, but I wouldn't worry about money period. We are transitioning into the age of Aquarius, which will be an age of abundance. Scarcity based society will be a thing of the past and everyones basic needs will be met for free.
>>
>>84886032
oh that's weird. i asked him to tell me which part of my post was false.
i guess i need to do epsilon backflips with real analysis something something to get an answer?
>>
>>84886070
LMFAOOOOO
>>84886045
You're a goddamn genius.
>>
>>84885713
I will get into agriculture at this point I'm going full monke
>>
>>84886107
oh shit the AI is going to take all the water nevermind
>>
>>84885861
Perhaps one day we'll see roomba tractors and self driving shipping containers and fully automated factories.

>>84885872
Let's try seeing what happens after boomer and feminist HR credentialism is phased out first, yeah? Communism has never produced material abundance. Capitalism at least affords us that. We had something adequate in the past, we don't need to gamble on something which might possibly, just this time, be exceptionally good for us.

>>84885955
>globalization
But who was the group that actually sold you out specifically? boomers
>and getting laid.
But who was the group that actually ruined getting laid for you specifically? feminist intersectionalists
I think it's deeper than
>>woman can now talk to a hotter guy overseas
Really, you can't even approach a woman without feeling like a rapist. This is a brainworm that other cultures don't suffer from. To be sure, they have their faults and birthrate problems elsewhere, but not being allowed to pursue and be persistent with a woman you like is not one of them.
>>
>>84886000
>the us job market has noticeably cooled
Or is it just the books aren't being cooked to tell us that they're at all time highs at the moment?
>>
>>84885734
>They've likely spoken over the phone with a fully realistic AI agent at this point and not realized it.
highly doubtful
>>
>data centers create employment

It's foolish to work for a data center. You're working to build infrastructure that will replace human workers such as yourself.
>>
>>84885744
>generate endless fully realistically voiced videos of PewDiePie
but it can never replicate his unique unhinged style. all ai slop feels like generic pablum, because it is: the average of a thing smeared across eternity. slop is instantly recognizable as being soulless and this unfixable.
the real problem is that YOU have to have a soul in order to see what's missing, and many people don't
>>
>>84885929
>communism is when a committee does stuff
why are people here so fucking stupid?
>>
>>84885872
>>84885887
Communism is no longer possible. The means of production have become completely ephemeral in the west.
How do you seize the means of production in an attention economy?
>>
>>84885955
>>woman can now talk to a hotter guy overseas
so? they can't fuck the guy or marry him or spend his money so there's no point. it's no different than having an AI simp - just text on a screen
>>
>>84886210
i called a place and only realized i talked to a robot after i hung up the phone.
I think OP is right to be concerned about how many jobs there will be in the future, but he's an autistic fucking retard that thinks calc is enough to understand anything about AI related shit and that the government is trying to kill cull people.
He also put THERE ARE NO JOBS! as the subject, which is questionable.
What is this a click bait article? certified fking lunatic
>>
>>84886228
What is another way to disturbute stuff? Different people have different opinions.
>>
>>84886251
>Different people have different opinions.
no shit. that's why democracy is central to communism. please do not insist that the USSR is some ideal to strive toward
>>
>>84886247
>i called a place and only realized i talked to a robot after i hung up the phone.
you might be a boomer, then, or an autist who can't into small talk and verbal micro-expressions.
clankers are instantly recognizable via voice
>>
>publicly traded corporations all use AI
>their products go to complete shit
>humans create privately owned businesses
>products are inherently superior
>jews have no control over enshittifying the product
>publicly traded stock market collapses
>new corporations overtake the old elite and bury them.
I can dream.
>>
>>84886287
you don't have to believe me, but the biggest tell was the way it would abruptly stopped talking when i interrupted it. everything else was pretty convincing. it also was in the accent of my country, which isn't what all the online one's sound like.
>>
>>84886292
>their products go to complete shit
this kind of already happened multiple times, it's pretty funny. not completely gone to shit, but they were way too confident in the tech
e.g., there was a massive outage because senior engineers at amazon lost control of an the company's own internal AI system that tore everything down and started rebuilding it. they fucking posted screenshots of their chat log with it "STOOOOPPP NOOOO I TOLD YOU NOT TO DO THAT NOOOO"
>>
>>84885713
Shut up and finish your degree, retard.
>>
>>84886283
>that's why democracy is central to communism
Thousands voices saying different things would not produce a decision you need to way to combine similar voices into unified packages, hence need for central committee as way to achieve decision like society does need to give you more than 55 square feet of residential space (like it was in USSR) but needs to build another data center for the Greater Good.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.