>make an aryan ethnostate
>implement leftist economic policies
what now

Race predicts. Doesn't determine. But why is race an "accurate predictor of crime"? Also, what are we counting as a crime? All arrests or only guilty verdicts?

Also this doesn't "completely destroy leftist beliefs", I could personally use that data to come traditionally leftist conclusions.

>>84887609
credits roll
you won

File: karl-marx-dialectic.jpg (53 KB, 337x395)

53 KB JPG

>>84887560
Leftists believe ind double think.
They are absolutely impervious to facts and logic, this is what makes leftism so strong philosophically.

>>84887609
Aryans are the most individualistic race. This wouldn't be likely.

>>84887560
this implies the justice system is compeltely currupted

we don't live in that world

so the accuracy of the chart is placed into question

>>84887702
>this implies the justice system is not compeltely currupted

i am the worst at not having typos

XDXD

>>84887707
The justice system discriminates against Whites. Black and Hispanic criminals are often labeled as White to inflate crime numbers, and the proportion of cops killed by blacks is larger than vice versa.

>>84887735
if its established the miscarriage of justice is real

then you can't trust the numbers that system is producing

>>84887735
>The justice system discriminates against Whites
Imagine unironically believing this when there are white pedophiles being pardoned every week.

>>84888125
we have been telling you about jews getting away with this you know?

And besides homo, in africa an estimated 50 million women have been wed underage
https://africarenewal.un.org/en/magazine/why-ending-child-marriage-key-advancing-africas-economic-development
nvm its 100mill estimated rofl lmao

So now you know that blacks and muzzies are hardcore pedos, yet just not persecuted

>>84887560
now do one for rightoids and fucking kids

>>84887560
Why can't you just be a racist leftist?

>>84888152
>we have been telling you about jews getting away with this you know?
Start taking accountability for your own actions. It's not Jews, it's (((You))). Stop allowing Jews to control your race (whites actually symbiotically enfranchise them but you're not ready for that convo).
>And besides homo, in africa an estimated 50 million women have been wed underage
>https://africarenewal.un.org/en/magazine/why-ending-child-marriage-key-advancing-africas-economic-development
African Muslims are irrelevant to our conversation. White Americans rape more children than other races in this country per capita.

>>84888193
>Start taking accountability for your own actions. It's not Jews, it's (((You))). Stop allowing Jews to control your race (whites actually symbiotically enfranchise them but you're not ready for that convo).
brain dead retarded take, NTA but this is the stupidest thing i've read today. just put all blacks on some evil land and build walls around it.

>>84888193
>White Americans rape more children than other races in this country per capita.
Blacks have a 2x higher rate of child sexual abuse per capita
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2841188

>>84888172
What about homosexuals and transgenders fucking kids and encouraging them to engage in their mental illnesses?

>>84887637
>>84887631
Don't bother. They want to force an outcome but won't ever talk about stuff like how, for example, the judge in the Rittenhouse case treated him like a son

You think they'd ever give the same sort of treatment to a person of another race.

On top of all of this they cherrypick the racial groups being compared - they'll compare black Americans to whites, without looking at the fact that they systematically destroy schools and utilities in predominantly black areas.
Fuck em

Stop arguing with lefties. It is a waste of time. They will lie and obfuscate until the end of time. They are the ultimate nigger lovers. NEVER vote for these people.

>>84888337
>without looking at the fact that they systematically destroy schools and utilities in predominantly black areas
Black students get more per pupil funding. What the fuck are you talking about moron? All you lazy fucks do is blame white people for you being low IQ and impulsive.

>>84888327
never happens outside of your andrew tate tik tok algorithm unlike your president who has been testified against on frequenting child fucker jew island plenty of times

>>84888371
Gay men are twice as likely per capita to be pedophiles. Are you a retard?

>>84888337
>You think they'd ever give the same sort of treatment to a person of another race.
"Our findings indicate that while Black wrongful convicts have historically faced significantly longer exoneration times than their White counterparts, these disparities have diminished over time to a point of reversal for individuals convicted in recent years."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09876-x

"Black Americans and white Democrats punish white perpetrators more than Black ones, whereas white Republicans show no net racial bias."
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5638431

>>84888412
>he doubles down on the andrew tatetik tok algorithm talking points
average rightoid iq everybody youve ever looked up to fucks kids but you surely are not a pedophile

File: alien-nine-alien9.gif (117 KB, 129x200)

117 KB GIF

>>84887560
did the researchers test for interaction between the unemployment, poverty, education, and race variables?

>>84888502
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/
20:1 straight to gay male ratio
11:1 straight to gay pedophile ratio

>>84888508
Research has shown that the black-white income gap is completely explained by IQ differences. The black-white IQ gap is about 70% genetic in origin.

>>84888508
people who ask these questions are like totally naive about black people it's kind of precious

>>84888178
Socialism with ethnocentric attributes starts to become fascism pretty quickly.
Fascism is a centrist authoritarian ideology btw.

>>84888346
They are truly some of the most subhumanoid creatures I've interacted with.

File: Thielinator_9000.jpg (658 KB, 1168x880)

658 KB JPG

Ok. So, the options are between gay retarded sociopath faggots that want white extinction and complete nigger world anarchy until the human species inevitably dies or MAGAfails ZOG world order (indistinguishable from the first) or foid reich (yup, it's the first one again with different branding) or luddite subhuman regressivism (also indistinguishable from the first one. Hmm, guess I'll pick Peter Thiel.

>>84888558
How about you pick the "stop being a gay retarded nigger" option?

>>84888530
They wouldn't last a day in Chicago, St. Louis, Detroit, Atlanta, etc

>>84887631
>maleness predicts. Doesn't determine. But why is maleneaa an "accurate predictor of crime"? Also, what are we counting as a crime? All arrests or only guilty verdicts?
There. I made it make sense in the labguage you speak. Clearly, you're just a mysogynist and don't care about women's safety and are derailing the conversation.

>>84888530
you don't know how linear regression works, and you don't care because you've already decided what the answers to your questions are.

>>84888635
You don't know how biology, genetics, nor psychometrics work

>>84888635
you're just unaware of how black people think

>>84887609
>Implement leftist economic policies
So they just give all the money away to other countries? Or do they import a bunch of people from those countries that start killing the locals? Or do they just keep fucking shit up trying to make "true communism" and don't understand how it will never work.

>>84888635
How does linear regression work? Explain it to us if you're such a genius.
>t. stats major

Wyte men are parthetic, day all ways keep a black man down for real cuh! I kant get no masters in enginearing cuz of dem!

>>84888678
you don't take a dataset with a bunch of different variables (race, crime, poverty, education, etc.) then run simple linear regression on each variable and conclude that whichever one has the highest r is the best model. this is the most basic concept in the world. all i ask is if the researchers made a genuine effort to look for interactions or alternate models or really anything because stats are very easy to manipulate to say pretty much whatever you want

>>84888661
holy magatardery

>>84888744
>holy magatardery
>it's an accurate description of people on the left in the west

>>84888714
>all i ask is if the researchers made a genuine effort to look for interactions or alternate models
Why don't you offer up some, genius? Even if you hypothesize of a better model, it doesn't change anything about the actual problem being that black people simply underperform intelectually and behaviorally compared to the other races and those differences being genetic in origin.

>>84888519
now do the one with priests also im not a fag i dont care

>>84888819
Public school employees are more likely to touch kids than Christian priests.

>>84888812
it depends on the data itself (which i don't have access to) and the chosen model selection criterion. statistics is a science. any results without methods are moot

>>84887560
No, it doesn't.
I hope you understand how much of a fucking retard you are.
Correlation isn't causation, you aren't analyzing how the variables influence each other. You are simply visualizing proportionality.

>>84888193
what a weak comeback
>africans muslims are irrelevant to our conversation
nope
dont worry its the entirety of africa
and you can cope all you want. amerimutts and whites can never reach this epic pedo number of 100mill

>>84889050
Causation is black people being more violent, it's as simple as that you fucking moron
>proportionality
What the fuck are you talking about retard? Proportions and correlations aren't the same thing. Are you black or something? It would explain why you're a fucking idiot

>>84889178
>Causation is black people being more violent, it's as simple as that you fucking moron
No, you fucking retard.
Explain why, in every graph, the number of victims reached the 800 victims mark way earlier than the graph where race is a variable.
>correlation and proposionality isn't the same.
You are right, correlation is much worse of a metric for actual dependence between 2 variables as it often gets it wrong with spurious reaults.
The argument I was making is that, to the general retard: (You); the visuals of the graph give the impression that, as the portion of non-white population inscreases, so does the portion of crime victims, implying a direct causal relationship. Which is a dishonest reading.

According to that graph, you need almost 40% of the population to be black/hispanic to reach 800 victims, mea while you only need around 4% of the same population to be unemployed to reach that number of victims.
You are an actual numbskull.

>>84889270
Look, another retarded seething blackboy liberal mad about his race's 15 point lower average IQ. Sucks to suck, didn't read your gay retarded post

>>84889280
>didn't read your gay retarded post
Because your IQ is too low to engage with it.

>>84889270
>Explain why, in every graph, the number of victims reached the 800 victims mark way earlier than the graph where race is a variable.
Are you an actual nigger? That's not how you read a scatterplot
>correlation is much worse of a metric for actual dependence between 2 variables as it often gets it wrong with spurious reaults
Proportionality has nothing to do with this. You probably don't even know what proportionality means you dumb shit

>>84889386
>That's not how you read a scatterplot
This is how I know you're retarded. You can't actually interact with the data or the graphs. You only have the most basic understanding of how those graphs work, but can't grasp the relationship between the graphs.
You also don't understand that correlation isn't causation, or you wouldn't have appealed to the nature of the scatterplot.
You probably don't even know what a regression is.

>>84889414
>crying about causation still
The causation is lower black IQ

>>84889426
>still doesn't understand the point
Kek

why can't op ever read graphs correctly

>>84889270
>According to that graph, you need almost 40% of the population to be black/hispanic to reach 800 victims, mea while you only need around 4% of the same population to be unemployed to reach that number of victims.
who cares that one is 4% and one is 40%? there are no states with 40% unemployment, so it doesn't matter. you're claiming to be intelligent but getting blinded by "hurr durr number is bigger". obviously the x axis is going to be different for different variables we consider, they have different ranges in the real world. each of those dots is a state, you know?
also, you can't make that sort of definite conclusion about unemployed population anyway. the correlation is very low. notice that around 4% unemployment there is a state with about 800 crimes per 100,000 but also a state with about 100 crimes per 100,000.
so you can't be sure that living in a state with high unemployment means lots of victims. but you can be sure that living in a state with high black/hispanic population means lots of victims.
if you move from a state with high black/hispanic population to a state with low black/hispanic population (say, a 40% state to a 5% state), it is very likely that the number of violent crimes went down. if you move from a state with high unemployment to a state with low unemployment (say, a 6.5% state to a 3.5% state), the number of violent crimes may have gone down, but it likely has barely changed. these two conclusions are obvious from looking at the graphs.

>>84889601
>who cares that one is 4% and one is 40%? there are no states with 40% unemployment, so it doesn't matter. you're claiming to be intelligent but getting blinded by "hurr durr number is bigger". obviously the x axis is going to be different for different variables we consider, they have different ranges in the real world. each of those dots is a state, you know?
Holy fucking retard lmfao.

>>84889626
go on mate, explain with your words why we should care that the x-axis is different for the different variables

>>84889644
>different.
Nominally, because it would suggest more sensitivity. If you need less of X1 to achieve the same of Y than you need of X2, it suggests that X1 has a higher effect on on Y. Particularly in a variable that is subject to the effect of many other variables. You learn this in your first class of statistics, when you are told that linear regressions aren't the only type of regression.

>>84889684
right, but here in the real world, state unemployment doesn't vary between 0% and 100%. it varies between about 3% and 7%. that's the true range we should be considering in our analysis of the sensitivity of unemployment. the graphs should really rescale everything into that range (and in fact they do so visually if not numerically) so that people who only took a single intro to stats course don't start getting a big head and thinking that they're getting fooled by evil statisticians when they really aren't.

>>84887560
Only about 6% of the black american population commits crime

The reason they commit "50%" of all crime in the US is because most black criminals are repeated offenders and will commit some minor crime like getting into a fight, get out of jail after a short time and commit another minor crime. Repeat fifteen times

>>84889742
>it varies between about 3% and 7%. that's the true range we should be considering in our analysis of the sensitivity of unemployment
Which means that a reduction of of 7% unemployment to 3% unemployment, that is a reduction of 4 percentage points, would be much more effective in reducing the amount of crime victims than a reduction of the same 4 percentage points with regards to the non-white population.
How are you not getting this?
You also still have 2 other variables in your pic, that seem to have higher incidence, which means that the efforts done to take care of those variables are more effective than those to take care of the amount of non-white population, per percentage point.

>>84889754
These racists really lack all critical thinking.
I just don't like blacks because they're ugly.

>>84889777
>Which means that a reduction of of 7% unemployment to 3% unemployment, that is a reduction of 4 percentage points, would be much more effective in reducing the amount of crime victims than a reduction of the same 4 percentage points with regards to the non-white population.
you forgot to scale the differences. going from a 7% unemployment state to a 3% unemployment state is something like going from a 5th percentile state to a 95th percentile state in terms of unemployment rate.
it should be obvious as well just by intuition that unemployment rates vary rather little state by state while black/hispanic population can vary drastically even across different cities within the same state for historical reasons. if your goal is to avoid violent crime, it's a lot easier to find a low black/hispanic population place to live than a low unemployment rate place to live.
>You also still have 2 other variables in your pic, that seem to have higher incidence, which means that the efforts done to take care of those variables are more effective than those to take care of the amount of non-white population, per percentage point.
effort is not equal for each percentage point across the different variables, bro... do you really think it's easy to reduce unemployment by 1%? if it was unemployment wouldn't exist. black/hispanic population can change by many percents in southern states by just writing some legislation to change the allowed number of immigrants or having more border guards.

>>84889864
>effort is not equal for each percentage point across the different variables, bro
Yes.
It's implicit. Creating more jobs is easier and has more positive effects than removing large portions of the population through forceful means.
>black/hispanic population can change by many percents in southern states by just writing some legislation to change the allowed number of immigrants or having more border guards.
No... those people are already there. And are, presumably, legal, as they are accounted for.
Also, unemployment is what would be actually controlled for by securing the boarder, ensuring none of the new jobs can be taken by new arrivals.
Btw, you just conceded your point, because you aren't arguing for the genetic standpoint anymore. You just admitted that other variables have a higher effect on crime rates, you are now arguing for which one is easier to fix.
Tongue my anus, fucktard.

File: 1781338844825804.png (347 KB, 624x480)

347 KB PNG

>>84887560
>>84887659
OP's citation is literally a leftist book. Not joking. Look up the title he uses as a source. LOL.

>>84889911
>Creating more jobs is easier and has more positive effects than removing large portions of the population through forceful means.
i never said we should forcefully remove people. are you ignoring the multiple times when i mentioned moving as a strategy to avoid violent crime?
>Also, unemployment is what would be actually controlled for by securing the boarder, ensuring none of the new jobs can be taken by new arrivals.
unemployment is a little bit more complicated that just new immigrant arrivals, unfortunately. we live in a global world and companies being formed across the sea impact companies here and therefore the jobs available.
>You just admitted that other variables have a higher effect on crime rates
where?
anyway, it's pretty obvious to anyone with a brain and eyes that not only is the correlation is stronger for the black/hispanic population but the slope of the line is steeper too, which means moving from a 95th percentile black/hispanic population state to a 5th percentile black/hispanic population state has a bigger effect on your exposure to violent crime than moving from a 5th percentile employment rate state to a 95th percentile employment rate state.
>b-b-but the x-axes are different
they've already been normalized to each other in the picture, scaled to the ranges of the states that exist. that's why i used the term "percentile".

>>84890021
>i never said we should forcefully remove people
You explicitly mentioned wanting to reduce the non-white population. Since you mentioned the importance of effort expenditure, it's logical to assume you aren't talking about a multigenerational plan of repopulation, which only leaves forceful removal as a viable option.
>unemployment is
You missed the point again.
Once you lose the argument, you suddenly try to change its scope.
>where?
Where you argued about effort expenditure and dispensed with your original genetic argument.
>correlation
You don't know what that means. Lmao

>>84890070
i'll ignore the strawman i guess
>You missed the point again.
>Once you lose the argument, you suddenly try to change its scope.
i'm just replying to what you wrote. maybe try explaining your points?
>Where you argued about effort expenditure and dispensed with your original genetic argument.
i don't recall using the word "genetic" at any point. maybe try using your words to explain where i'm wrong instead of just asserting it?
>You don't know what that means. Lmao
not an argument. i accept your concession to my "moving from a high black pop state to a low black pop state is more effective at reducing your exposure to violent crime than moving from a high unemployment state to a low unemployment state" point.

>>84890133
>being low IQ and impulsive.
These are genetic traits, you can't even get your points straight lmao
>"moving from a high black pop state to a low black pop state is more effective at reducing your exposure to violent crime than moving from a high unemployment state to a low unemployment state"
It's not though. You require averages to make that affirmation. And other data as well.
The more you speak, the more it shows that you don't know what you are talking about.

>>84890229
>>being low IQ and impulsive.
>These are genetic traits, you can't even get your points straight lmao
you'll never believe this, anon, but you see the name "Anonymous" above my post? that's actually a generic name used by almost everyone on this website. wild, huh? you can use this powerful tool called "common sense" to be able to tell that someone with an entirely different writing style who is posting hours later is not the same poster as someone you were previously arguing with.
>It's not though. You require averages to make that affirmation. And other data as well.
you don't, it's in the graphs mate
>The more you speak, the more it shows that you don't know what you are talking about.
if you're someone who know what you're talking about, it should be really easy for you to explain why, right, mr. smarty pants? gonna put your money where your mouth is?

>>84889754
According to a white house press release 1/3rd of black males have a felony charge

>>84890915
post it then (originally ofc)

>>84891027
https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2022/05/09/expanding-economic-opportunity-for-formerly-incarcerated-persons/
Also your math is factually incorrect. Using UCR which only covers 2/3 of the population, about 5% of black males are arrested PER YEAR

>>84890915
A number that doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. I'd have to see what percentage of the white population have felonies.

>>84891066
It makes perfect sense. Using 2019 UCR 1.8 million blacks were arrested that year. Males commit about 3/4ths of all crime which gives us 1.35 million. UCR covered a population of 230 million which is about 2/3 of the 340 million US population, so adjusting would be about 2 million black male crimes PER YEAR in the US, and this is likely an underestimate for several reasons. There are roughly 23 million black males in the US, thus each year roughly 9% of black males are arrested per year in the US. Although some of these crimes are able to be committed multiple times a year, the odds of this heavily impacting the data much is low also for several reasons. Even just using the numbers given by UCR it's roughly 5% per year. Even with recidivism across a generation that's a significant amount being arrested. I showed 99% of my work so I better not hear some numbskull objections.

>>84891047
>404 page not found
wow thanks

>>84891047
>Using UCR which only covers 2/3 of the population, about 5% of black males are arrested PER YEAR
Show me this paper then

>>84891275
Yeah sorry I didn't mention the link to the source is dead, try archive if you really care

Here's Uniform Crime Reporting
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/topic-pages/tables/table-43

>>84891264
>Although some of these crimes are able to be committed multiple times a year, the odds of this heavily impacting the data much is low also for several reasons.
Bullshit. A lot of crime comes from repeat offenders.
And again I need to see how much of the white population have felonies.
I can only see these numbers being possible through minor drug crimes.

>>84891328
>A lot of crime comes from repeat offenders.
If you get arrested enough they'll throw you in jail and prison for longer and longer. Also think about the fact that many criminals spend years in jail and thus aren't able to commit crimes. You conveniently ignored the rest of my work and decided to cry about shit I already addressed so I don't know if this is a good usage of my time.
>white population
Calculate the number yourself, it's incredibly easy. If you can't follow my work then return to school.

>>84887560
liberalism (what you call leftism, but in reality is the foundation of the current west) is clearly wrong. the blank slate and everything is nonsense. however it doesnt matter because the elites benefit economically from pretending that its true

>>84891287
How are you getting the "5 million a year!" stat from this UCR link? I don't see anything that would reference such data

>>84891365
>I don't know if this is a good usage of my time.
>Calculate the number yourself
What's this stupid attitude all of a sudden? If you don't want to discuss things then don't open the thread or reply.

>>84887560
If you are extremely stupid, yeah this would be very hard to argue against

>>84891387
>5 million
Are you fucking retarded? I said 5% not 5 million.

>>84891389
Because I already explained how to get the number, YOU are the one who wants to know so YOU can spend time calculating it. FFS I'm not your teacher nigger

>>84887560
I dont have it right now but theres a chart showing how almost all crime is done by repeat offenders. You could get rid of a tiny sliver of the population and eliminate crime overnight

>>84891287
My bad
but how does that UCR page reference the 5% statistic you mentioned?

>>84891401
See
>>84891428


(original original)

>>84891428
I put all of my work here >>84891264
It's basic arithmetic, should be easy to follow.

>>84887560
>want to live a good life despite not being rich
>want to curb the power of the elites
>want to protect the environment and a future for our children
>don't want immigration
>don't want feminism
which side am i? the answer will determine your iq

>>84891401
Well following the same train of logic it looks like 4% of white males are arrested every year and that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me either.

>>84891540
That's 1 out of every 25, not unreasonable at all.

>>84891264
Does it say how many of those black arrests were first time or repeated offenders?

If it's 5% a year then that would mean 30% of blacks have committed atleast one crime just from 2029-2026 alone and that sounds really fucking unrealistic

>>84891675
>Does it say how many of those black arrests were first time or repeated offenders?
I'm not answering this. Fucking figure it out yourself. I already gave my explanation of how it probably doesn't matter especially strung across 70 years. If you're so concerned about recidivism, then calculate the number yourself using whatever data, although I'm sure you're fucking retarded and would mess that up anyway. I'd be really surprised if you're a white or east Asian male, only others could reach this level of obliviousness

>>84891698
So you're purely basing your number on a statistic that could include repeated offenders?
It doesn't say anywhere in the UCR page you linked if they included repeated offenders in their numbers or not

>>84891745
>gets proven wrong with math
>complaint gets addressed preemptively
>still complains
>refuses to do any research or calculations
>probably incapable of doing so
>none of this matters to the actual point which has been explained multiple times
>still refuses to listen
The average experience arguing with a liberal/woman/nonwhite/homosexual

>>84892069
Nigger I am asking you a simple question that should be fucking easy to answer

Does that fucking number account for repeated offenders?

>>84888337
>complete jew faggot spreading jew faggot lies
>tripfagging namefaggot Redditor
Checks out.

>>84892391
buzzwords are not an argument

>>84892378
Yes, it has to, if it's 5% per year then 100% of niggers are arrested after 20 years. You are stupid. Here's a link you might enjoy
>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13524-017-0611-1
>people with felony convictions account for 8 % of all adults and 33 % of the African American adult male population.

>>84892477
>>people with felony convictions account for 8 % of all adults and 33 % of the African American adult male population.

I would like to know what data they used for this estimate and I would like another article showing this same statistic

Blackcel here. I lived around rogs my whole life, i know they are basically a different species
Why are white liberals here defending them?

>>84892610
>i know they are basically a different species
"They"?
You mean we, stupid.

>>84892670
I dont mean we. Im nothing like those violent niggers. Its most blacks. Not all

>>84892378
>Does that fucking number account for repeated offenders?
No but that doesn't matter, even if only 1 in 200 black males were arrested for a new crime every year for the next 60 years they would be 30%.

>>84892561
>I would like to know what data they used for this estimate and I would like another article showing this same statistic
Holy monkey nigger, READ the fucking study. READ YOU LAZY ASS DUMB NIGGER

>>84892378
I've given several reasons and explanations why repeat offenders don't matter especially within a single year of crime you stupid fucking moron. All your retarded nigger ass does is deflect and keep repeating the closest thing you have to a retort without critically thinking nor taking any initiative of your own to learn anything or do some calculations and research on your own because you are an 85 IQ subhuman congoid

File: who.jpg (773 KB, 1232x861)

773 KB JPG

Ok

So are you going to gladly concede Asians and Jews are the master race because they have lower crime and higher IQ than whites then?

>>84892712
>>84892733
If black crime is genetic then why is it only 33% of the population and not 60% or higher?

>>84892704
>I dont mean we. Im nothing like those violent niggers. Its most blacks. Not all
Now if only people cared to differentiate (they don't).

>>84892784
In terms of IQ yes. Jews however have an array of predispositions to certain mental illnesses and health problems. Asians are smaller physically whatever that's worth go you. If Asians want their own countries then they're entitled to them in the same way Whites are entitled to White countries.

>>84892786
I frankly dont care. I completely understand and agree with racism. If a white person is racist i wouldnt care. I understand their position completely.

>>84892785
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You're really a fucking moron.
>how is Sickle Cell anemia genetic if only 1 in 16 blacks are carriers compared to 1 in 2000 norwegians?

Niggers are actually so retarded it's insane. Never argue with one, just call them a slur and move on. I can't believe liberals defend these apes

>>84892833
>I completely understand and agree with racism
Have you self deported then?

>>84892844
Then what traits cause niggers to commit crime if it's not all of them?

>>84892858
I absolutely plan to. 100% I will do that.

>>84892833
>>84892892
Now, I'm not one to "Based Nigger!" post, but both agreeing niggers are retarded AND willingly going back to africa is good enough for me. You're one of the good ones

>>84892978
Course you'll forget that by tomorrow when it's back to TND posting.

>>84893163
he's literally TND posting right now

File: a1bb4607a19b8b466a1bd6518(...).jpg (113 KB, 1079x1250)

113 KB JPG

>damn mane we need more money fo dem schoolin even though we already have the highest funding for public schools

>>84893182
100 percent? No. that is literally impossible. It is impossible for literally ALL of them to be retarded.

>niggers commit crimes at a slightly higher rate than broke-ass idiots
>I MUST SUPPORT LORD TRUMP FOREVER. SOCIAL PROGRAMS BAD!

Anything to justify your dumb cult and obsession with race.

>>84892819
>but but but

No whites are simply more violent and more stupid than Asians and Jews