Could someone please help me expand my collection of this type of picture?
>>22399149Funny how many face differences are possible. And No.2 and No.15 are similar enough that they could be sisters.
>>22399167
>>22399189 oh my
>>22399154since we're here anyway:5>4>1>3>6>2
Silvie Delux
it's crazy how few of these women I find even remotely sexually arousing.>in b4 gay, faggot, etcThere's a couple familiar faces that I know are porn models, but most of these women are "meh" tier at best. Amazing, really, how many average women there are out there, and how many of these women could get laid whenever they want.
>>22399149Whats the point? Comparing bodies?
>>22399472>he doesn't understand liking to see naked girls
>>22399385this is not an incel thread
>>22399385You’ve been brainwashed by porn and digitally altered photos. It’s not fixable. You’re broken permanently now and should kill yourself
>>22399691nta but I'd like to imagine things would be different irl. Unfortunately I'll never enjoy the privilege of confirming that speculation firsthand.
>>22399385I know what you mean. Most of them look quite mediocre or even ugly. But to be fair, part of the reason must be the camera. They're a bit distorted so they look anatomically bad, add to that the fact they're not in good shape, they're flabby and skinnyfat. The weird faces and tattoos only intensify these flaws.
I hope these were somewhat what you were looking for, OP.
