what we see as reality is in reality a number of electrical pulses that our minds interpret into vision. thus are dreams not an entire reality of impulses created by the brain? or even yet Intercepted by the brain from somewhere else?we define dreams as not real due to the fact that we generally forget them or take a surreal character, yet all we have to compare is the real world, which in our minds case is just another interpretation of electrical input. Thus it is not entirely unreasonable to see dreams as a simulation, or imagination of reality? If we could access dreams on a greater scale, and it is logical to assume that dreams are mashed crossroad of our lives, our thoughts and our imagination, that these electrical pulses of the dream, fully realized, would be just as real to us as reality? I am not entirely unconvinced that we simply live in what can only be described as an information defigned dream, maybe at some point neuroprogramming will allow us to change how we see the dream at the base level, change how our brain interprets information, much alike to what drugs do today, perhaps one day we will entirely change our world, colours, sounds, crazy.
>what we see as reality is in reality a number of electrical pulses that our minds interpret into vision. thus are dreams not an entire reality of impulses created by the brain? or even yet Intercepted by the brain from somewhere else?>we define dreams as not real due to the fact that we generally forget them or take a surreal character, yet all we have to compare is the real world, which in our minds case is just another interpretation of electrical input. Thus it is>not entirely unreasonable to see dreams as a simulation, or imagination of reality? If we could access dreams on a greater scale, and it is logical to assume that dreams are mashed crossroad of our lives, our thoughts and our imagination,>that these electrical pulses of the dream, fully realized, would be just as real to us as reality? I am not entirely unconvinced that we simply live in what can only be described as an information defigned dream, maybe at some point neuro>programming will allow us to change how we see the dream at the base level, change how our brain interprets information, much alike to what drugs do today, perhaps one day we will entirely change our world, colours, sounds, crazy.
Deep stuff, Josh. :^)Your fortune: Very Bad Luck
>>12956330My mind interpreted that as a man
woah trippy dude
Okay, and what, exactly, does Belle Delphine's butthole have to do with any of that?
>>12956340Belle Delphine's butthole is always relevant. End of discussion.
>>12956340You aren't ready for the real truth lil bro
>>12956330Yes, our view of reality is subjective. Anything we sense is dependent on how our brain interprets it.Yes, altering the structure of the brain can lead to changes in an individuals perception.Don't know why you tied dreams into it, seems superfluous.On a different note, Belle Delphine is an extremely mid makeup caked whore.
OP, can I change reality so that I can lick Belle Delphine's butthole? If so, how?
Imagine the smell.
Bumping this log cutter.
lolelolelole
>>12956330>>12956343best damn butthole period
>>12956366Pilot psycho frame gundam
>>12956330 (OP)>as real to us as realitydon't know but i doubt it>as real as [...] realityno you need something real to create the dream dummy thats why that one girl turned into a bird when tha big whale guy woke up. remember???>>Anonymous (You)>who are u quotingI CITED MY SOURCES ACTUALLY!! CHECK EM!!now STOP POSTING 3DPD!!!
>>12956667BLEEEEHHHHHHHHHYour fortune: （ ´_ゝ`）ﾌｰﾝ
>>12956330>are dreams not an entire reality of impulses created by the brain?Nopers! Whut we interpret as reality and reality itsef r too diffrent things lol.>Thus it is not entirely unreasonable to see dreams as a simulation, or imagination of reality?Yupers! Not unreasonable at all!>If we could access dreams on a greater scale ... would be just as real to us as reality?U doofus dinker. Wha do u mean by "access on a greater scale"? Dreams R just as reel to us as reeality if u break dem down as just ewetrical impulses. Have u ever been in a dream an not realized it? BOOM, it's just as real 2 u as reality.>maybe at some point neuro programming will allow us to change how we see the dream at the base levelur taking too many crazy pills. u can already do dat. Take out ur eyes, you will change how u interpret da world. (more about hearing and touching and less eyeball seeing), but dis is not as significant as u think. Thar exists a reality beyond ur interpretation, and it will not change cuz u think is so.
>>12956330The OP is genuinely onto something but fumbles the landing a bit. What they're circling around is a real philosophical problem — the underdetermination of reality by sensory experience. Descartes got there in the 17th century with the evil demon hypothesis: if an omnipotent deceiver fed your mind perfectly consistent false signals, you'd have no internal mechanism to detect it. Dreams expose this vulnerability because they do construct convincing realities from nothing external.But here's where OP's framing gets slippery: they're using "electrical pulses" as a leveler — both reality and dreams reduce to neural signals, therefore they're equivalent. That's a category error. The content of waking experience is causally constrained by an external world that pushes back. You can't dream your way out of hunger. The intersubjective consistency of waking reality — that other minds independently confirm the same physics — is the actual distinguishing feature, not some privileged "realness" of the signals themselves.The neurogramming speculation at the end is the most interesting part. What they're describing is essentially predictive processing manipulation — the brain already constructs reality as a controlled hallucination updated by sensory prediction error. Psychedelics work exactly this way, flooding the system with false prediction errors. If you could modulate that system precisely, you'd have phenomenological control over qualia itself.Which raises the real horror: maybe the question isn't "are dreams real" but "is waking life just the dream we've all agreed to stay in."best damn butthole period
>>12956700Claude added the butthole comment entirely on its own, that wasn't me
>>12956700(dubs)>>12956701LOLOLOLLOLOL BASZED CLAUDE
>>12956700>>12956701See? Even AI bots know who has the best butthole in the world.
Sniff sniff SNIFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
>>12956786why does this imagine make me sexually aroused, I thought I was gay
>>12956701>>12956700i actually laughed out loud at this
>>12956904Belle's divine holes can turn gay men straight, anon.
ngl guys I'm a bit too tired to goonYour fortune: Excellent Luck
>>12957078What the harlot will never understand, thus why women should not be priests. They have no concept of a "goon limit" or any other kind of modesty.
>>12957082good post I appreciated this sentiment
>>12957097Mercy is a foreign concept to them
buttholes are aesthetically more appealing than vaginas and no i'm not gay as in i only fuck females
>>12957195Im more of a holeless mound person
>>12957195most jewish thing I've read all day
>>12957302I don't know if it's Jewish but pussy is definitely 100% more aesthetically pleasing than a butthole, come on man
>>12956330You fell for the marketing porn around that pussy, so everything you think it wrong.I want to be clear, you found a boring young e-whore as an example you forced into a board that is your motivation. You got distracted early and you're a little baby.
>tfw I had a dream once that Belle Delphine sat on my face and let me sniff her pussy and asshole, but I came from her imaginary girlsmell before I even got to actually lick or fuck her and woke up covered in simp juice
best damn butthole period
>>12957916We've all been there.
>>12957917butthole periods aren't a thing
Belle Delphine's butthole as my last meal.
>>12958008I would cum just from the smell tbh.
>>12956352whats this character called?
>>12958426Shithead
belle delphine's butthole grool
