This is le… evolution? I can't believe people have just arbitrarily lined up different fossilized animals in a row, always (no exceptions) with massive gaps, claim they turned into one another, and the vast majority of the general public accepts this garbage as science.
>>16147480You got a better explanation for why all animal species didn’t exist at the same time?
>>16147480>he thinks it’s based on size and not when they show up in the fossil record and how derived each one isWhy do you insist on embarrassing yourself like this
>>16147492This is fundamentally based on the belief that lower geologic strata is significantly older than it really is.Old Earth dates are based solely on radiometric dating, which is the assumption that radioactive materials in decay can be used like a clock (they can't, rocks of known age give extremely inflated dates)PhD geologist just finalized a major study on Grand Canyon rocks proving they can't be millions of years old:https://youtu.be/Tma__c-jFSMThey had to sue the park just to collect samples, the lawsuit took years.The rock layers are bent in such a way that could have only been done when they were soft. If they were hardened they wouldn't bend, they'd fracture.Just one of many evidences of young Earth you ignore:1. Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor2. Bent Rock Layers3. Soft Tissue in Fossils4. Faint Sun Paradox5. Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field6. Helium in Radioactive Rocks7. Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds8. Short-Lived Comets9. Very Little Salt in the Sea10. DNA in “Ancient” Bacteriahttps://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/10-best-evidences-young-earth/
>>16147508>answers in genesis>noahs flood made the Grand Canyon>radiometric dating is fakeBack to /x/ with you
>>16147513It is legitimate science, not /x/.e.g. you have zero explanation for why we find so much helium in zircon crystals that should have been gone millions of years ago, if you assume their age according to their uranium->lead decay rate.
>>16147517>you have zero explanationHelium easily diffuses through the crystal lattice of zircon with the right conditions while lead does not. The only real way for lead to get there is for it to come from decaying uranium whereas helium can continually diffuse into the zircon over time depending on temperature. Instead of stopping to think how the helium could get there you people instead immediately latch onto this single strand of evidence because it aligns with your pre existing beliefs, regardless of the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.
>>16147513I fucking hate that /x/ started purging all the flat earth faggots and they came over here or even sneak onto /his/ or /lit/. These used to be the smartest boards on the site and now even /g/ and /k/ have overtaken them.
>>16147532....Helium is produced when uranium decays to leadIt's not a question of how it's in there, the question is why is there still so much left when it easily diffuses out of the crystal, far more than there should be if it's millions/billions of years old>>16147533The Earth is round.Please stop confusing us with flat Earthers. There is PhD scientists who work at Answers in Genesis and ICR.
>>16147546>the question is why is there still so much left when it easily diffuses out of the crystal, far more than there should be if it's millions/billions of years oldThat’s the point dipshit, it just as easily diffuses INTO the crystal. At least do some reading on the topic before arguing about it>There is PhD scientists who work at Answers in Genesis and ICRlol
>>16147553>it just as easily diffuses INTO the crystalGases always diffuse from areas of higher concentration to surrounding areas of lower concentration. They wouldn't diffuse into a zircon crystal.Source: well-established diffusion law of physics
>>16147480Look at their feet
>>16147508Look my guy. The methods and assumptions being used are working in terms of finding oil/gas/mineral deposits. Come up with a model that’s equally useful, and not just in a philosophical absolute truth sense, and then we can talk. Even if evolution as a theory is completely wrong, it’s still useful. We still use the hard shell model of the atom even though we “know” atoms aren’t hard shells. We still use geocentric methods of celestial navigation just because it’s been so well refined that using heliocentric ones aren’t worth it.
>>16147480Natural selection has major issues when you take combinatorics into account.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrY_CEGpZCQ
>>16147568>Gases always diffuse from areas of higher concentration to surrounding areas of lower concentration. They wouldn't diffuse into a zircon crystal.Except you don't know the relative concentrations of helium in the Zircon's environment
>>16147635If you want to read the actual source of the argument: https://answersingenesis.org/age-of-the-earth/6-helium-in-radioactive-rocks/
>>16147643No thanks
>>16147568>Gases always diffuse from areas of higher concentration to surrounding areas of lower concentration. They wouldn't diffuse into a zircon crystal.That is unless the surrounding area has more helium in it, I’m not sure how much more simply I can explain it. If the helium is constantly diffusing out until the point where there’s none left as you say should happen, then ANY amount of helium in the surrounding rock will diffuse back into the crystal since a zirconium with no helium left in it is as low a concentration as it gets. Hence why even if a crystal is at the age where all the original helium has diffused out it can still have helium in it, as more diffuses in from an environment with high helium levels and high temperatures. An environment like I don’t know, maybe the magma where zirconium usually forms>>16147643>answers in genesis againTake this garbage elsewhere
>>16147480Don’t let these horses distract you from the real menace that are whales with legs
>>16147480>arbitrarily lined up different fossilized animals in a rowHow about: lined up the same fossilized animal in a row. These people have absolutely no idea what they’re doing>btw they have feathers now
>>16147961Based and duck-billed velociraptor
>>16147961>picks an unusual animal that was for the longest time only known from fragmentary remains which were destroyed during WW2 during a bombingWhy are paleofags so insufferable
>>16147984your nose-cone is showing
>>16147508Trying to find evidence for noahs flood is retarded. If the event happened as described it would have destroyed all plant life and made the earth unihabitable. So even if the event happened the evidence/destruction would have had to be undone.
>>16147480It is Vatican fabrication, after all.
>>16148103The second is basically the same as the third it’s just standing up and the first isn’t even that far off considering when it was discovered
>>16148330>nose horn vs thumb spikeOh its retarted..
>>16148502>this single tiny bone being in the wrong spot means that it’s wildly different>ignore the second and third being the same thing in different posturesConsider suicide
>>16149225>single tiny bone>it’s a fucking nose-spikecastrate yourself or turn gay
>>16149446>implying a nose spike isn’t a single tiny bone and is inconsequential to how the rest of the animal is depicted>ignoring the fact that it’s literally the first dinosaur ever discovered so they had no basis on how to reconstruct itTake your gender reaffirming pills and waste away
