Getting tired of these questions - editionprevious >>16247414
>I am tired of these people... their comment-questions
Does Musk have sharpshooters looking over him somewhere? He was probably contemplating whether or not to say the safe word
>>16249756ITAR contract hitmen in the shadows
>Over 100 rescue team members and 30 vehicles from Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center heading to Inner Mongolia to welcome Chang'e-6 back homehttps://x.com/CNSAWatcher/status/1804928915015700833
>For landing on the Moon you need pretty big landing legs, in case one leg lands on a boulder and another lands in a crater, you don't want to tip over.
>Our favourite picture taken during the #Ariane6 'wet dress-rehearsal' – showing Europe's new rocket standing tall on the launch pad for the first time.https://x.com/ESA_transport/status/1804766396779290870
What's the current status of the launch site that SpaceX started leasing some time ago?
>>16249764well stage again, just don't reuse the shit thread
>>16249740Edition of what?
>>16249740his questions were good fuck of criticizer
>>16249764Calm down, retard
Estronaut during his tour acts like he doesn't undestand much about rockets and just says random stuff to keep the conversation going.
>>16249740>no /sfg/ in subject line
>>16249727>the payload for all the flights this year is data>just to learn things>its design refinement, to see what works, what doesn't work>some things sometimes work, which can throw you off>it worked once but doesn't work again because the combination of factors isn't the same>the first things you find are fundamental errors in design, where success was not one of the possible outcomes>then in some cases its like russian roulette, success is sometimes possible, but once in a while you blow yourself up>that is going to require a lot of flights to find the 1-in-10 failure or the 1-in-100 failure, there are going to be a bunch of things like that>Tim: [Commenting on Starship hops]>learning how to work with stainless steel as the primary structural element, working with liquid methane and full flow staged combustion engine as the engine>you need very powerful actuators for the flaps>the engine to vehicle interactions are very complicated>you don't really see those on a test stand, different vehicle to engine interactions when you are in flight>there is no test stand that can test a rocket at 17,000 mph doing 6gs in every different orientation>you do as much as you can on the ground, then you got to fly it, do some things in simulation but a lot of things are not going to be included in the simulation>Tim: Its crazy [about the 100th time he has said this]
did boeing make this thread?
>>16249784mass optimization, please understand
>>16249787be silent or you will commit suicide
>>16249784>negative mass allocation
>>16249794>overweight vehiclesRude :(
>shit jokes to cover posting incompetence wew
they're making fun of us in the /sfg/ discord again
>>16249775Yeah I got that too. It was just chitchat, no substantial questions. Elon did have interesting things to say but you could hardly have had a less stimulating interviewer.
>>16249768that thread is good
>>16249805reusing threads is bad, it encourages early staging
>>16249807that wasn't even an early stage, two people posted threads simultaneously
>>16249808
So do I delete this thread or what? I'm fine with that
>>16249819I thought that wasn't possible?
>>16249819YES
>>16249822It wasn't at some point, there might be a time limit
>>16249819Yeah just make another one with the correct formatting lol
>>16249816stupid frogposter>>16249819if you can
>>16249831but then the continuity is lost, the previous thread got archived already
>>16249833that other thread has a link in the old threadcontinuity is overrated anyway
>>16249835Okay, I don't think it makes sense to delete this one anywayStage to other thread>>16244898>>16244898>>16244898>>16244898
>>16249833continuity was broken pretty much daily back when collagefag used to split threadsNot a big deal. Plus I think everyone just searches for “/sfg/” via the catalog anyways so that’s the more important thing to prioritize
how to get a /sci/ girlfriend?
>>16249883"hi i want to show you my big rocket"
>>16249883Get? No, you make your own.
>>16249883In the library.
>>16249883
fags
>>16249903How?