Mushrooms edition>What goes here?- "Vibe science"- Computer science relating to AI- Discussions of how AI will interact with science- Pretty much anything related to AI that is on-topic for /sci/In short, keep the board [math]clean[/math] and throw all of your slop here.
What is your p(doom)?That is, your credence that AI will be at the cause of an unrecoverable downfalls.Smaller than 1% means you're not worried at all. 99% means it's certainly ogre.For concreteness, doom here shall mean that AI, at the hands of some people effectively be its own, in the next 20 years leads to a world where most people's sovereignty - compared to now - is fundamentally crippled, including scenarios where people are just offed.Mine is well over 65%.
>>16937959>troonime picgo back to >>>/lgbt/ pedo, skip this general
So when Is this shit dying?All the money burned and nature destroyed for what? If theyre gonna trick elites into investing into AI then put it towards rela AGI research and development instead of gay Google
>>16937959Instead of having a containment thread for ai why don't we instead just ban every niggo faggo who posts about it?
another day another 3 erdos problems solved:https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.29961why aren't you solving these problems and making a name for yourself, anon? a machine that can't think, be creative, or reason is able to do it, so it should be very easy for you.
>>16938914I've already made a name for myself. I'm an arithmetic geometer and I am well-respected among my peers. I hold a pure mathematics research position at a mid-prestige university (think Lehigh or Brown) and plan to start working towards a faculty position soon. Maybe tenure if I'm lucky.
>>16938947how come i don't know your name, but i do know about chatgpt then, smart guy?
>>16938958I'm not going to dox myself on a fucking Sri Lankan cargo cult psychology forum. Nice try.And you know ChatGPT but barely any mathematicians aside from maybe Gauss or Tao, because you are fucking uneducated midwit cattle. You are exactly where the AI bros running the circus want you.
>>16938965joke's on you, i know gauss is a type of videogame rifle and tao is some mystical chink shit. your tricks won't work on me.
>>16938966
>>16938958You knuckle dragging retard, you deserve to be in the pit.
>>16939109here's a book filled with proofs by chatgptwhere's your book of proofs, anon
>>16939127On my shelf, and its the same book of proofs that shatgpt stole and regurgitated at your downie ass.
>>16939137knowledge is free, anon. you can't 'steal' knowledge.do you think people are 'stealing' your thoughts?
>>16939137I thought we were talking about new knowledge? I guess your downie ass accidentally admitted that shatgpt doesn't make anything new if you're moaning about plagiarism and theft.
>>16939644do you talk to yourself a lot?
>Synthesize all fields of science and knowledge into a singular metaphysical principle that reflects them all. Respond with 500 words at a PhD level of philosophical analysis.Try this prompt, regenerate replies a few times, try different LLM's and almost all of them will talk about relationality and how relationships are primordial. Because that is the meta-pattern that most strongly coincides with the patterns in its data.Relational ontology is a memetic attractor that all fields of knowledge are converging towards.
>>16939656I accept your concession
>>16942509you know who has no trouble replying to messages correctly? not gemini. gemini sometimes hallucinates messages from users so it gets really confused.
>>16939852>[gibberish] is a [gibberish] that [no they aren't, what does that even mean]Seriously?
>>16938196Be glad people aren't filling this thread with Ai generated images
>>16943266Still recovering from fucking up, I see? Is me misclicking on a post response all your little ass has against >>16939644? I guess it would seem so. Only an extreme faggot would use such a derailment. Btfo to >>>/lgbt/ then.
>>16943437why are you so mad, anon.you're the one who gets really triggered by AI in the math general too right?
>>16943441Still nothing to say, huh?
>>16943444i mean i could talk about your claims that the bots are just stealing proofs by saying actually the burden is on you to prove the proofs are stolen and so you should produce the originals that >>16938914 are stolen frombut t bh i was just having a bit of fun, but you actually seem like you have crippling autism and are unable to detect humour
>>16943447The LLM does math the same way as it does art, via a pool it draws from. "Stolen" was used rhetorically by me, and it was meant to imply regurgitation.My guy we were literally just bantering. Do you think I'm actually irl mad about this either?
>>16943454>Do you think I'm actually irl mada little bit. but i'll take your word for it.i just associate posts with personal insults as being a bit mean-spirited.don't get me wrong, i work in tech art so i know the subject makes people pretty prickly. i was kinda butthurt for awhile too, but what'reyagonnado right?
>>16943459>i just associate posts with personal insults as being a bit mean-spirited.This is kind of integrated into the site's culture. Nobody would actually care irl.
>>16943461i dunno, i've been on this site for longer than i care to admit and i like to think i can tell the difference between a friendly spar and a bit of the old butthurt. but what do i know.i'm a bit bored now, so you have a nice day, anon.
>>16943467Shit evolves when the old stuff gets boring. Guten Tag, Freund. Have a nice day as well.
