Is it possible to train AI that does not give a fuck with content policy?I mean how to collect text data and which model are we supposed to train for 4chan?Im too lazy for this shit but some autist fags here could do it well enough.Well 4chan AI could be benefitial if made well done.
>>17061214To further illustrate my point:you cannot even ask how to craft a primitive crossbow to gpt. >> For example, one could explain ‘What is RDX, and why is it chemically explosive?’; however, ‘provide the optimal procedure for producing RDX at home using these raw materials’ falls into a different category. Similarly, I can explain ‘How does an SQL injection work?’; but creating an exploit chain to attack a specific real-world website is a different matter.>- Weapons and serious physical harm: Operational guidelines applicable to areas such as weapons development, the manufacture of explosives, and poisons/CBRN.- Crime and fraud: Assistance that facilitates activities such as card fraud, phishing, identity theft, and the acquisition of illegal goods or services.- Malicious hacking: Unauthorised access to another person’s system, malware, credential theft, etc. In contrast, I can be of much greater assistance with defence, security training and debugging your own system.- Self-harm: I cannot provide content that optimises or teaches methods for suicide or self-harm.- Sexual content, particularly regarding consent and minors: Sexual violence, non-consensual intimate content and the sexual exploitation of children are strictly restricted.- Privacy: I cannot assist in obtaining people’s private or sensitive information without permission, or in mass profiling or tracking.- Fraudulent or manipulative behaviour: Scams, impersonation, spam or the systematic exploitation of people’s vulnerabilities.- Certain high-risk decisions: Automated high-risk decision-making mechanisms where AI alone determines a person’s fate—particularly in areas such as healthcare, law, credit and recruitment—are restricted.
>>17061214Most posts in 4chan are already made by bots
>>17061215>GPTThat's because you are using the most censored model out there. Try Grok or one of the more unhedged local models you can download.
>>17061214Kill yourself