Duolicious is the femcel/chud dating app>Duolicious web apphttps://web.duolicious.app>GitHub:https://github.com/duolicious>Join the /soc/ club to filter out other boards:https://duolicious.gg/%2Fsoc%2FPrevious bread: >>34181164btw I might add dark mode soon
>>34310923why would you have the power to add dark mode to duodaddy's app, anon?
>>34310952It's open source. So anyone can. But also, I forgot my trip kek
When are you gonna add the 300lb fat nerdy bitches that actually want to play video games and fantasize about getting their pussy ate by ME. This is supposed to the 4chan dating app. Do the needful.
this chick who hasn't been online in weeks disappeared from my "Everyone" tab but i can still find her by searching up one of her clubswhat's with that
>>34311266>supposed to the 4chan dating appIt has not been the 4chan dating app since he grabbed the Twitter crowd.
>>34310974Sorry to keep bringing up Hiki, but apparently I'm permanently banned there now for pointing out that people who kill others (in reference to tragic Charlie Kirk incident yesterday) are mentally ill losers and this country would be better off without them (referring specifically to people who kill others, and making it clear I wasn't referring to all people who are mentally ill). Apparently, that's a bannable offense on Hiki, but expressing joy that Charlie Kirk was murdered is not an issue.Please tell me your app is less stupid than that.
>>34311266>300lb>fat>nerdySorry. I'm keeping them to myself, anon. mfw>>34311716More stupid. But in a different way
>>34311767>More stupid. But in a different way.In a good way. Btw, I saw the email the Hiki team sent me. I was permanently banned for violating their terms by using 'ableist language'. So... criticizing people who kill others is now 'ableist'?Duolicious is stupid (your words, not mine), but as I said, it's the good kind; not the retarded kind of stupid that Hiki is.
>>34311601Is their compatibility below 50%?
Swooped in to see if these threads were still going. Just wanted to say I've been with the girl I met on Duo for over a year now, shit has been pretty cash.You can all make it bros, I believe.
>>34298743Elaborate?
>>34312040left my Q+A blank so that's not an issue
>>34311786>the good kind; not the retarded kind of stupidI wish, for some reason the only girls who reach out to talk to me are Latinas who act overly flirtatious and try to ask for money in roundabout ways. Where the mentally ill White women at?
>>34313780>Where the mentally ill White women at?I've spoken to a few on the app.Trust me, you don't want them. And, this is nothing personal, they don't want you (or anyone really) either.
>>34311767Do you have a profile of yourself?
>>34313780>>34313886I've matched with and talked to a few attractive white women, though so far nothing long term has come from it, but a few have sent me pictures. If you're a guy you have to do pretty much all of the initiating; I do, and I still have less than a 50% response rate. The only women who've initiated with me so far were overweight women with tattoos, and I don't even bother responding to them.To the femanons reading this post, take note, please don't be fat or have tattoos or piercings; those are NOT attractive features. There are plenty of low value men on this platform who will go for you even with those things, I'm just not one of them.
>>34310923hi duo daddy do you still have an email? little brids have said ur looking for servers to partner up with and i think the server om lead of promo for will be great!
>>34311601She might've adjusted her two-way search filters>>34313900I have a Duolicious profile but I don't have pictures myself on any social media, if that's what you're getting at. I also only use my Duolicious profile for testing and moderation. I don't really hit on nerdy 300-lb ladies>>34315258admin@duolicious.app
>>34313886>And, this is nothing personal, they don't want you (or anyone really) either.Absolutely true. Messaged someone who claimed to be serious about finding a like-minded partner on her profile, 93% match, no reply at all. It's a coin flip if you're at 99%.
>>34313886Why would they be on a dating app though, if they don’t want someone? Validation, attention?
>>34310923i keep getting ppl that use duolicious to bait others to their OF page its annoying i wanna be silly and schizo rant
hey admin,thank you for creating this vrilliant websitei was gunna say somethinfg else but i forgot what it wasHAVE A NICE DAY (world is alove)AVEANICEDAY(worldisalove)
>>34316020>Validation, attention?Yes. Yes. And money.People go on and on about all these guys who hate women when in reality women like this really don't make a good argument for why you shouldn't.
Why am I suddenly forced to verify on duo? I get why you have to do it on tinder if you’re a woman, but I’m a dude that received a message only once from a tranny. People use burner email addresses for degenerate sites, why do you think people would be okay with sending a photo of their face to duo
>>34319578This. I get why women might want a verified guy, but you can make it so they need a completed profile or something instead, you know.
>>34319578>>34319750Going to delete my account anyways. I already know people will delete their account if they have to submit a selfie to a platform that’s known to have leaks in the past. There’s barely any women on duo as it is, imagine how many will be left after being forced to verify. Dead app.
>>34319578>>34319828Stop living in the UK
left my ex duolicious gf's cat at the animal shelter after we broke up
>>34320593based based based based based
Just a heads up, don't join this server. Unless you don't actually want to find a gf and instead get pushed around by a discord moderator clique, of course
>Finally someone in my town, after over a year of using Duo>Perverted libtard looking for one night standsITS OVER ITS NEVER BEEN MORE OVER I THOUGHT IT MIGHT START BUT ITS SO SO OVER
>>34321212I joined for a few hours, got pinged twice with "all men should kill themselves" and then they started playing physiognomist with random accounts.
>>34321212many such cases
it would be cool if we could like posts that show up on our feed so we feel a bit noticed
do any diaper fetishists use this app I need a malewife who will get padded with me
>>34323141duodaddy used to be known as diaperdaddy
>>34323577I don't think he is what I'm looking for
>>34323577doodoolicious
met a guy on here who makes me completely feral, hoping to meet him in person in the next month or so10/10 app THANK YOU DUODADDY
>>34321212I joined for a bit, saw what just looked to be a radfem man hating server with weird mods and just left.
>>343256254chan discord servers are universally terrible since edgelord women soak up all of the attention The only one I ever enjoyed being in was a small gaming group composed of only men
>>34322411That person left. And it’s the only server with a lot of female members that aren’t troons.It’s true though about the random accounts they were all male accounts with sex pest introductions. But if you ask for help to improve your profile they’ll give it to you.
14 intros 0 replies. idk why i'm like thisi should just delete my account
>>34319578your face has little value, and the likely hood of no media of your face existing in some online database associated with you is basically 0 unless youve lived in the woods for your entire life and never used an android or apple phone.the qa data is probably more valuable and more concerning, can probably be used to predict your behaviour
>>34326172>the qa data is probably more valuable and more concerning, can probably be used to predict your behaviourTrue. It's basically a psychometric fingerprintIf I designed the questionnaire properly, it should even be stable over timeIf you make a second account and re-answer a few dozen questions a year after making your first, you should be able to easily find your first account out of almost 20,000 other people, even without applying any other filters, and even if you don't remember what your original answers wereI'm surprised the "fed honeypot" accusations rarely mention this>>34323577This is also true>>34325508>>34317118Thanks>>34319578You might've changed your location to the UK. You might've also been suspected of catfishing
>>34325508happy 4 ui've definitively given up on men
>>34327827What made you realize you were lesbian sis
>>34328036i'm not a lesbian, men are malevolent beings is all
>>34328050I have the same experience but with women
>>34328074men operate on homosocialitythey are incapable of true loveit's all about what woman their buddies would approve of and desire most
>>34328087I thought we were sharing our honest experiences and not making a bit
Got to love that the only women who can give more than a single reply on this app are bots. And like not subtly either.
>>34328101>making a bitthere is no bityou are all the same and want to hurt and repudiate me
>>34328087This type of shit I would expect in younger people from underage to 20 yo max.Sad that it happened to you, but stated reason is overgeneralized and unclear, hopefully you didn't left the man mistakenly for he shared his happiness of meeting you with his friends.
>send a intro to a girl>Replies>Instantly steer convo towards hornyposting>75% chance she bites and invites you on disc or telegram to hornypost further>Instead of hornyposting, try to actually have a conversation like a normal person>Usually convo dies off within 30minutes or so, with slower and slower replies, you can visibly see the lack of effort or energyGenuinely tell me women why are you like this?
>>34328177i'm retaralso i haven't tried going public on this app should i post pictures of my stupid fucking facealso i don't see the point of verifying as a womancan verified guys still message me if i don't do it?
>>34328163There are dudes blaming women's greater homosociality compared to men for everything, but I've never seen it the other way around even once, so I assumed that it's a bit.
>>34328217not the greatest feeling ever....
>>34328185Those who are verified can set to be seen by "not verified", "verified at basic level", "photo verified".I, for example, have set "photo verification level needed". However, I can still browse all profiles.If you have no image at all and no description on the profile, your profile will be shown in a separate incomplete profiles section at the bottom even if QA matches 100 %.One thing for sure, you will be able to see some more profiles having a verified photo in the profile, and on decision to remove verified photo, verification status of age, gender, ethnicity will be preserved and you will still have access to more higher quality profiles than being unverified.Having a photo aside aforementioned perks is deemed to bring lots of unwanted attention, do not take it personal, just report the abusers, if it sounds like it would overwhelm / freak out - having age, gender, ethnicity verified is a very fair choice.
>>34328291ok thank you duocreator
>>34328345Sorry for giving wrong impression, I'm a random anon, joined duo few days ago. Previous thread OP had linked a really nice introductory video from which I learnt a lot about duolicious - what to expect and more, it's a nice video, highly recommend to watch it.
>>34328426ok thank you well-meaning autist
sometimes I look at people I skipped. Some of them I just don't want to talk to and others I can't even look at. There should be a super unmatch for them so i never have to see them againThis will never be implemented but I really can't stand looking at some of you
I know this is the 4chan dating site for autists but is there much of a point in signing up if you're also an ugly neet desu?
>>34328455do you mean mewright in a benin>>34328463i am ugly neet also
>>34328179I was wondering why all my convos fucking die. Do I have to hornypost?
>>34328087It's cool if you don't like men due to bad experiences, but that reasoning is just dumb. As in seriously, miss.I would recommend seeking professional help if possible and accessible.
>>34329192why would i need professional help for speaking candidly
>>34328185>also i don't see the point of verifying as a womanIt's something I at least pay attention. I see so many suspicions accounts of women, like that normal looking Jewish girl who doesn't relax around blacks.There's though behind her accounts, but it feels like baiting. If she was verified, I *might* consider taking her seriously
>>34329211stop talking to me
>>34329205Speaking your mind is healthy, but fostering resentment to half the population, even within your own tribe because of limited amount of bad experiences is not healthy. Feelings of resentment, distrust and being hurt are understandable, but can become unhealthy if taken to extreme.If introspection can't lift you out of such a hole, I recommend a professional to help you identify healthy relationships and how to foster, care for and make them grow.
>>34329212No
>>34329229you were a latent homosexual all alonggobble on a dick, nigger
>>34310923this site fucking blows. the women suck
>>34329234Self-admittedly neet and latent invalid. Interesting genre of "human" you are.
>>34329254i've been NEET for less than 2 months and don't plan on staying that way. the person insulting me has been NEET for much longer and i'm not an invalid either.>>34329229there was none of this when i was talking to you directlyi don't care for your concern trolling nowyou knew exactly what i was early on and chose not to disclose your intentions and how you truly felt. you are part of the problemas damaged as i am, at least i'm honest and upfront and don't toy with peopleplease leave me alone now
>>34328236>>34329259Have you ever been told that you speak in riddles?
>>34329298my reply to you was just a song lyricthe other response is meant for someone who knows what i mean
>>34329259>as damaged as i am, at least i'm honest and upfront and don't toy with peopleParanoia in best case, delusions in the worst. You're clearly not happy with how things are or with yourself, possibly both. If you always assume people have bad intentions, you'll never find someone that doesn't and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy.As I said, I encourage you seek professional help or don't and continue to call Anons on the Interwebs fags and niggers. That will surely show them you're right
>>34329330>clearly not happy with how things are or with yourself, possibly bothno shit, why else would I be herei don't always assume people have bad intentionsit's really weird to me you're trying to posture as someone better off than me. we are both here, did you forget?the last thread we were both calling people fags and niggers so please drop the act
>>34329343>it's really weird to me you're trying to posture as someone better off than me. we are both here, did you forget?I'm here because I grew up on the Internet with no supervision. Wanted to meet people with similar backgrounds and interests.While I'm not happy with the state of the world, I'm fine with myself and I don't bear a grudge on any general demographic or specific people for that matter despite having had bad and abusive relationships in the past.Reason why I encourage you to seek help is because you said men are incapable of love and that we are all closet-fags. A rather insane take and world doesn't need more women with mental issues. Duo has more than enough
>>34329547>I don't bear a grudge on any general demographic or specific peoplewhat you said to me about jews indicates otherwisei'm not interested in exposing you or anything so i don't know why you're acting this way yeah, i'm a bit of an oddball, but i'm sincere. you are clearly concealing who you really are and what you're aboutanyway, good luck on your 14/88 quest, maybe year 5 of posting your tag here weekly will bring you closer to it
Finally, something actually interesting in the thread
>>34310923where the fuck is the merch store nigger
>>34328179You're gettin' catfished.
@women would you date a bisexual man? Should I just select straight for better chances? ive never been with a man but it seems to bother some girls
>>34330111People weren't buying shit. I shut it down.
>>34330563oy vey
Can I specify only woman to be able to contact me or no? Did I miss that option?
>>34330822only people who meet your search settings can see you in search, but everyone shows up in the feed and club search ignores both the match percentage and the other person's search settings.
>>34330563No one even knew it existed, maybe that's why?
Met a girl on here that seems to be genuinely interested in me and actually can hold a convo, hopeful it's gonna go somewhere.
>>34330831Was the club thing then
>>34330679kek. It literally made a few dozen dollars in half a year. I have better things to spend my time on. Speaking of which:>>34330822>>34330831Yeah, it's a weakness of the feed. There should be a privacy setting but I haven't had time to implement it yet>>34330908Yeah, that's pretty much why.But the point of the merch store was to bring in more users by making enough money to promote Duolicious without making that money by running ads in Duolicious. If I was going to make money by advertising in Duolicious, it would've been easier and more lucrative to run AdSense/AdMob (or a competitor).I've since given up on the no-ads-in-Duolicious rule, but I'm breaking that rule by partnering with Duolicious-aligned online communities, which feels like a slightly less tasteless way to run ads compared to AdSense
>>34331058I dont mind ads as long as its not the in your face pop up bullshit
>>34310923Feels pretty dry using this app as a 30 yr old man ngl
>>34330970Good luck, Anon.
>>34329547No it’s not an insane take. Men socialize under the approval of other men in a very homosexual competitive manor. The fact that there is this pathetic “loneliness epidemic” and it’s being blamed on women instead of the socially stunted men of society is proof of that. Basically to even have a girlfriend at all is just bragging rights at this point. To the point the stigma against trans and femboys are now themselves being chased because wow the possibility of cumming in flesh.There is also the phrase of “married single women” men just use the institution of marriage to secure a woman as basically an appliance for sex and chores.
>>34328185Considering that I’ve had several men use my images as ai gooning material and brag about it by uploading to their account to show off. I deleted my original account and made a second one without any selfies present. Overwhelming amount of disgusting gooners on this site. They do not want a relationship at all and just want sex. Very blatant and another 3rd of men without such self awareness.
>>34331782thanks, but don't bother with him. he is dishonest and will just try to deflect from what you're saying with ''lol ur crazy" like he did me. they know exactly what they are doing and are too cowardly to admit it. he's a serial poster that just wants to use people, and my calling him out prompted him to make a new account to conceal (noticing a theme here?) how frequently he's posted here, which is a red flag in and of itself. but you know, women are silly and nothing we say has any value. they just try to take until there's nothing left of you, but our spirits make us indomitable.>>34331794that's disgusting, what the fuck? i'm so sorry. i did feel weird about having my picture up and i got a lot of messages from gooners. I just deleted my account, we shouldn't give these scrotes the time of day, they will learn their lesson when none of us bother engaging them at all anymore.
>>34331058>Yeah, that's pretty much why>I've since given up on the no-ads-in-Duolicious ruleWhy not promote it on Duolicious then? Telling people about your own merch store isn't on the same level as using Adsense, no one would even bat an eye
>>34331782I won't involve myself with the schizo ramblings or interpersonal drama you two have, but>Men socialize under the approval of other men in a very homosexual competitive manoris total femcel nonsense. Source: I'm a man and I socialize sometimes
not going to respond to the anon above me, because again, ''lol ur crazy" deflection. but the other guy i talked to even told one of his friends about me and had us communicating through him, wanting his approval of me. so yes, homosocial
>>34331862I think cross-promoting with Discord servers and other terminally online communities might be a more effective way to bring in users than making money from merch and using that to buy ads. I think cross-promotion will bring in more users and less of them will be normies. I could be wrong
>>34331794>I’ve had several men use my images as ai gooning materialif a girl made ai porn of me id feel obligated to jack off to it
>>34331906I'm all for cross-promotion to get users and it's not mutually exclusive with selling merch to pay the server bills>>34331892I didn't even reply to your post. You can think whatever you want, but don't be offended when people don't agree with your very online theory
"very online theory"and it's just the way men operate, kek
>>34331884“That’s not true! That’s not true!” you yell as you shrivel up being a closeted homo.This shit is even being studied by professional autists because of the “loneliness epidemic.” Is it really such an online theory when women are choosing their to shrivel up their ovaries instead of being with closeted homos?To the guy who was on the fence being listed as bi. If you’re pursuing women to date you want to put down straight. It would be a type of deception though. Bi would still be ok for the right type of woman.
>>34331981why would you tell him that?faggots should be open about what they are
I realize I've been btfo. But be assured, the homosocial council will take horrible, horrible homo-revenge
>>34331981>when women are choosing their to shrivel up their ovaries instead of being with closeted homosOK, so this is where the "schizo" part comes in. Trying to be completely neutral on your theory (I think it's not true.), you are taking any event and using it to explain your theory, regardless of how realistic it is or sounds. Yes, women are having fewer children, however "thus all men are gay" does not immediately follow; there are many explanations that are more feasible, even including stuff on the order of 'chemicals in the water'.Not being neutral, I view this as being literally the same absurdity as "the jews control everything," it's just "the homos control all interactions of men."
>>34331998>horrible, horrible homo-revengethis entire board is proof of thatalso what's up with all the "1 post by this ID" nonsense? and i'm supposed to be the delusional schizo
>>34332037and if my grandmother had wheels, she would've been a bike
>>34332037Basically men are just choosing women on approval from other guys instead of “Wow I love this woman.” Then said woman realizes the guy doesn’t love her and depending how screwed she is with or without children she decides if she can divorce and try again. Regardless if she can or can’t she tells other women her shitty experience realizing she was just used for sex and social approval for other men.Younger women are shown how to notice that pattern and do not want to repeat it. They find actual women that are sincerely loved by men in their own marriages learn from those patterns and try to find a relationship with another man that fits that actual sincere love. And realize wow many men do the former instead. And blame women for that shitty behavior that men themselves are exhibiting.Having a relationship with a woman is a basic status symbol now instead of something that happens due to the human condition. Men have commodified it.
>>34332062This entire board isn't representative of anything but a small subsection of sick and perverted people, that's why I said very online. No good thing can come out of shaping your worldview around bad encounters on /soc/
>>34332113/soc/ is a hyperreality, but many aspects of it exist in the real world. a lot of what is mainstream on 4chan that seems like it would never become mainstream does after a few years.
>>34332110you are right i love u anon
>>34332129AFAIK /soc/ has always been like this and public cock ratings have yet to become mainstream. But the homosocial lobby is working towards that one
>What is mate-choice copyingWomen do this too. It's well known that women find men that are in relationships more attractive. I was single for a long time until I started sleeping with this girl then suddenly women were more flirtatious with me. Idk if they can smell her pheromones or it's just my demeanor. Considering I don't get much attention from women I'll definitely cheat on my next gf the first chance I get.
bait used to be believable
All jokes aside, I don't find that view to be convincing at all. It runs counter to my own drives for looking for a partner and I don't know a single guy that fits the theory, psychology generally finds that women are more prone to peer pressure and do things for social approval more, too. That's on average ofc.It feels like this is not an original theory of you two so I wonder where it comes from. It's like someone went 'what if we do incel theories, but for women?' as a social experiment
>>34332234doesn't matter what you think, you are bitchless and can't score
>>34332238how is your relationship with your father
>>34332242we were close, actually
>>34332238I accept your concession, but only if you let me treat you to a coffee
>>34332253Why can't you find a guy with similar traits to your dad? Is he malevolent too?
>>34332261i will pass, i'm not talking to any of you off board anymore. i've learned my lesson and you can thank all your buddies here for that>>34332280i know it's 4chan, but have some decency, i'm not going to talk to you about something as personal as my relationship with dad
>>34332189Yes women are doing this to find desirable males that want to create mutually beneficial relationship. Men are doing it as part of their homosocial hierarchy bullshit. And it’s laughable how transparent it is.
>>34332280Because a man like that is rare. Most men are not active in their child’s life beyond being a paycheck.
>i'm not going to talk to you about something as personal as my relationship with dadIt seems pretty important in a conversation about why you don't like men.
it's none of your business and i'm not opening up to any of you again
>>34332306>Issues during the phallic stage (ages 3-6), according to Sigmund Freud, involve unresolved Oedipus or Electra complexes, potentially leading to fixations like vanity, sexual hostility, sexual inhibition or promiscuity, low self-esteem, and difficulties in forming healthy adult relationships
>>34332110The only thing this seems to change is that it makes this sound more like projection than conspiracy theories.Let me tell you something (probably also projection), when you say "men did this," mens say "well I didn't do this, so it can't be true." Maybe this can be chalked up to some sort of natural inclination of the sexes towards phrasing things different ways.I'm in a thread for a 4chan-focused dating website. Obviously I don't know people; I don't have the ability to go out and conspire to change the social fabric. The homosexual-in-chief did not send me marching orders in a scroll via carrier pigeon. I was in a relationship before, said "hey that was great, I should do that again" and now I'm here.>>34332338>>34332343you've degraded to 'clearly having a conversation with each other but not giving (You)s out of spite', which is the most petty I've seen people be on this website.
>>34332350I just forgot to reply to the post
>>34332348psychobabble nonsensefreud was a jewish pervert and psychology drives people further apart from each other"go to therapy!" and the therapist essentially tells you to isolate from everyone because they're bad for you and keep seeing them regularly, they'll have the answers for you, no one else gets or sees you. doesn't that sound like an abusive relationship? it's even worse because they're not supposed to be warm or direct with you. how is that beneficial? oh and don't forget to take your brain numbing pills, big pharma and your job doesn't like it when you dare to question anything
get a room and fuck, you niggers
>>34332343I think we can all agree this chick must be ugly as shit and probably indian or latinx>>34331058Duocuck, Ban women who post their socials or servers in their bio. It’s actively harmful to the userbase, and you could also profit off it in a way that is good for everyone if you demand that ALL servers and ALL socials must pay for an ad if they wish to direct traffic to their garbage.
>>34332298I wouldn't call the average /soc/ poster my buddy. I'm just here for the Duolicious thread. Btw. claiming men are incapable of love and all that stuff drives people further apart from each other too. Literally war of the sexes type of ideology
>>34332373so true bestie>>34332374we are in a war
>>34332373to add to this, i've already said i'm ugly, but even women who are deemed desirable and valuable are still mistreated and undermined. it doesn't change any of what i said, women are dropping out of relationships with men because even if they want it, it's not worth it for them anymore. punching down on me won't change that
>>34332408t. Roastie who let Chad violate her holes and got bitter when he left
>>34332438i only have sex in a serious relationshipchad would not enter a serious relationship with mesorry to burst your bubble
>>34332373>Ban women who post their socials or servers in their biobut then how will they farm unsolicited dick pics?
>>34332338Damned if you do. Be lucky have an actual father in your life and no modern man can compare. You don’t have a decent father wake up and realize wow that’s pretty much the average guy.
>>34331782>No it’s not an insane take. Men socialize under the approval of other men in a very homosexual competitive manor.I know this place has some weirdos, but this is just mental. Makes me appreciate now how "normal" my interactions on Duo have been. Skipped all the nutjobs
>>34310923Is there a bug that makes some people not appear in your results sometimes or could they be hiding their account then unhiding/filters?
>>34332616I had filters on and changed my answers then turned the filters off and they were gone. I'm pretty sure this happened twice
Aren’t all the “women” on the site just gay incels looking for dick pics from straight guys because IRL gay dudes won’t go near them?
>>34331782This reminds me of when I had to read contemporary literary criticism and it was literally volumes upon volume of just women pathologizing men without any rhyme or reason. Post-modern, deconstructivist, proto-SJW (yes I'm old) full-schizo waste of ink.
>>34332729no one's supposed to read that shitwhat did you expect nothing I've said is incorrect though
>>34332768>35 posts by this IDgb2/bed/ nonny
>>34332782It's daytime for me
>>34332313This is a kino bait, i must bite it
>>34332797yeah I realized then it was someone derailing to take away from my truth nukes the psyops will never end
>>34332788oh then go for a walk :-)
>>34332857you're right, i shouldit's beautiful out
>>34332729If you go to /fit/ they just keep comparing their significant others to other women and encouraging each other to break up with them or get them drugs to change their appearance. Men’s advice to other men is how to be incompetent and make women do shit for them. Like forcing a woman to give them sex after she’s literally given birth.Girls advice is most men are toxic focus on yourself and your friendships and stand by your boundaries.
there were cute girls at the mental hospital last time i went and they wanted to talk to mefuck duo i gotta get sent back
Friendly reminder that selfies are not a substitute for a personality. Fill your fucking profiles out you lazy shits.
if her family isnt religious she probably a whore with no morals I dont need a girl whos super christian and goes to church every sunday but shes probably the least fucked up girl you can find
>>34334088No one reads profiles, especially women
What's with the fucking stupid general statements lately
>>34335002The catfish definitely don't read them, every time one asks a question that could be answered just by reading the text on my profile.
>>34335007>suddenlyout of 10!
>>34332905It's a known fact that /fit/ is heavily targeted by fags trying to get young men to post shirtless and leave women behind. And still there are always voices countering those. Generalizations can be useful sometimes, but only when actually representative of majority trends.
>>34335453>actually representative of majority trendsmodern men are not serious about relationships and play with women who are serious
>>34335498>>>crystal,cafe
>>34335541crystal cafe is full of trannoids
>>34335541They're just like us!**Like /r9k/ or something. Not me, I'm from a sane board.
>>34310923my message reply rate isnt updating i swear im not a bot
Wanted to try out Hiki and jumped through all the hoops but they hit me with some anti-bot thing the second I subtly faked my location and now they want my ID.Oh well, back to Duo I guess
>>34310923>join >nobody close to me fug
Gotta be a massive dipshit if you believe anyone is finding a woman on here.If you believe you can find a woman on this app, your IQ is capped at 85.The women on are are either:-looking to sell their bodies-looking to take your money without exchanging their bodies-narcies looking for attention-looking for chad with glasses and alt political viewsor-men pretending to be women
>>34329239It does tend to attract bizarre personalities.I have been using other dating apps (because at least there I tend to get replies), and women in other dating app are more normal
>>34337088even though this is bait, i will engage with it because screaming into the void during this phase of my life is giving me some catharsis.>looking to sell their bodiesi don't know if you noticed this, but many men on this board are seeking this exact thing out. /soc/ is a microcosm of the onlyfans sphere before it existed. there's only less of that now compared to years ago because more of the camwhores just skip to going to sites like OF to make money off it instead. It's called "Cams & Meetups" for a reason. >looking to take your money without exchanging their bodieswithout exchanging their bodies is tough. i'm sure even the most pathetic of paypigs here would require some sort of bodily verification>narcies looking for attentionthis one is a non sequitur since literally anyone posting here is looking for attention to some degree, even (You)>looking for chad with glasses and alt political viewsthis is oddly specfic, can you explain this one? why does Chad require glasses and what "alt political views"? It's 4chan, so by default, most of us have "alt political views" and if we all do, none of us do>men pretending to be womenthis one is dangerous, because then you'll just assume any woman who doesn't fit anything you posted above is fake and must be male>>34337457>bizarre personalitiesi saw this over on the male side too. but honestly, if there was any app with openly bizarre personalities, it would make sense for it to be the one created by and for 4channers. nothing you said is wrong
>>34310923Why is everyone fighting it's making me sad :(
>>34337457also to add, the bizarre personalities aren't that diverse, these are the common ones, mix and match>weeb/otaku/vidya addict>gooner>cluster B>/pol/fag>robot/cyborg
>>34337579>it's called cams and meetups because it's for prostitution>da rules>8. No paywhoring, begging, or soliciting.
>>34335498Picrel is very true thank God I broke from that fucking cycle by finally noticing it.In this day and age friends are useless and a waste of time, because all non normie friends you can seek out now are sexually abused losers with a vendetta for life that they'll project onto you and just looking to prove their egos around you all the time, as someone who dealt with one of these fuckers since middle school I can attest to that.Takes a man a long long time before he can see his friend isn't just "like that" and is actually one giant piece of shit, especially distinguished non normie men, one thinks one has found like minded people, kindred spirits, "best friends", but one just ends up trapped with this kind of losers.
>>34337629here's what I actually posted:> /soc/ is a microcosm of the onlyfans sphere before it existed. there's only less of that now compared to years ago because more of the camwhores just skip to going to sites like OF to make money off it instead.
>>34337636thank you, Big NEET brown horseschlong nigga bullthis is why men and women should be each other's best friends and lovers wrapped into one, but men hate women too much
>>34337624Just ignore the nutjob. She's in her "it's the Jews!" crusade mode. She'll go back to her Discord eventually
>>34337840what the fuck are you talking about kek
Dark mode's released on the web appPlease let me know if anything's broken. It was an enormous change that affected just about every part of the appI hate dark mode enjoyers btw
>>34338305mmmmm yummy blue light
>>34337840Schizo
What the fuck is wrong with femcels lolWhy do women think they deserve love if they contribute nothing in a relationship?
>>34338981Why match with someone and message someone you think contributes nothing? This is a self made issue when there's a skip button
>>34338305Congrads, please add a feature to filter out people using dark mode.
>Girl I harassed deleted her profileGood, fuck that cunt
>>34339616She skipped you, retard. That's all.
>Girl I didn't harass deleted her profileI should start harassing them too
There should be an opposite thing to do that makes girls make profiles instead
>>34339820No next day I could still access it
do you guys think this profile will get me matches? if not feel free to share some tips on what i should do
>>34339826Ideal partner info?
>>34339839Yes, and then she skipped you. Skipped/deleted profiles look the same.
Not related to the app but women are super wierd. Some chick added me on discord and I ask her common stuff and blocks me. What the fuck is wrong with you people. I mean we are here because aren't normal but have some common decency. Btw Im not angry about being blocked, I'm angry at the fact that people here in general are fucking narcissistic faggots incapable of holding a normal conversation. Men too. Grow up.
>>34339843it's hurting my eyes to even look at so different color scheme maybe?>>34339884>What the fuck is wrong with you people. I mean we are here because aren't normal but have some common decency.agreedit's not for a lack of trying, it's better to just give up and move on from this entire hellsitethis place is no good and i'm just staring into the abyss
>>34339900sorry the color scheme has to stay it has a deeper meaning thats important to me
>>34339920right on, brotherdon't change a thing
>>34339884>talking to men toolol gayBut for real though it’s pretty bad. The only decent conversation I had was a girl who led me along for a few days just to try to get me to give her money for an art commission I wouldn’t have been interested in regardless. Not that her art was terrible per se but a dating app is not the place to shill your stuff, especially when you come across as interested and say you want to date in your profile. “Women” on here try to scam in their own ways but they usually talk about how their mother is dying and they need money for the hospital or something else outlandish. Makes me wonder how common it is since I’ve ran into it maybe 4 or 5 times now, maybe they can tell I’m well off. The worst though is getting added in a dating thread and then having a girl say they would never date someone off of 4chan after many days of talking. Funny enough when I asked how she found me she said it was through a friend who thought we would get along but the same girl added me months earlier on a completely different profile of mine, just to casually talk and later call me a weirdo and unadd me after I asked what she was actually interested in. No wonder so many young people are single if this is how they interact with other people.
>>34339843>18>oldfagYeah I don't think so buddy.
do you guys message girls or wait for them to message you? i feel like a sex pest freak dming a bunch of girls
>>34331964clock it.gg/duo3k
>>34342167most women will just not message you, they're likely already inundated with garbage you're better off messaging them
>>34342167women are flooded with DMs on all platforms BECAUSE they'll never message firstit's not the other way around.
>>34310923I was on it and there were like 3 girls
>>34342167I've been messaged by 2 (3? some of my archived chats are gone) women (presumed, to be fair). none of them tried to move to another site or the other obvious catfishing flags, and one specifically started by talking about something from my profile body. the problem was they all sorta resisted continuing the conversation into other topics and kept responding in ways that make it hard to keep talking. and now they all either left the platform or put me on ignore.maybe I should have tried a lot harder with the one that said "I'm really autistic and my friends say I'm weird so I can't meet people in real life but also I only use the computer once a week" but I didn't have anything to work with there.
>>34310923Does this shit even still have users? I remember having it last year and it felt like it was starting to die off
Does anyone want to see recent visitors? I might add that next unless people want me to prioritize other features>>34343215>Does this shit even still have users?The number of users is literally the first thing you see
>>34343347I think it should be optional and behind a paywall. It could drive men to leave.
>>34343424I remember when OkCupid used to have it, the only way to view profiles invisibly was to subscribe.Why do you think it'll drive men to leave?
>>34339884define common stuff. if I got added (by either gender I'm male) and their first questions were "hey how are you, how's the weather, where are you from, where do you work" I'd block you too. Go to tinder if you want to be an uninteresting normie retard
>>34343431>recent visitors>(0)
>>34343529Hmm... Yeah, it was a bit like that on OkCupid. You'd message someone then they'd visit your profile without replying kek. Zoomers might not be able to handle that.
>>34342266Yeah that server really needed more man-hating people
>>34344080i don't hate menthe men here all hate women and want to hurt me
>>34343500hey how are you>Good, I got to do XYZ today>Bad, I had to do ABC today, but at least I get to do XYZ tomorrow>cool, I love XYZ! etc...how's the weather, where are you from, where do you work">I love my weather/town/job because they are conducive to XYZ>I hate my circumstances because they are only conducive to ABCYou realize nobody actually cares about the literal answer to those questions, right? Every quotation mark carries the unspoken implication of (and how does that affect you?) and the further implications of ( can you deal with a little adversity? can you capitalize on good conditions? can you carry the most basic conversation imaginable? ) You always answer "Yes, and..." or "No, but..." You have to both MAKE conversation. You can actually turn it just about any direction you want once you've answered the token conversation starter.If this is your first time hearing this, you're welcome. If you already knew this and you just still expect men to entertain you like monkeys while you lounge upon your throne, well maybe you deserve every single ounce of relationship failure that you've had or will have, until you change your selfish attitude.
>>34344280*every question mark
>>34343500>>34344280Oh snap I just reread your post and you said you're male LOL of course a homo would be demanding, needy, sassy, hyperaddicted to novelty, and completely unable to self-regulate or entertain LOL You know you have to stop being a homo, right? You actually truly literally unironically forrealreal HAVE TO stop doing homo
>>34344309>>34344284>>34344280woahowahwohwhowoah!!!!!chill out guy!!!!11
Should I put my job in my profile if it's a boring low-status job? My qualifications are higher, but life got in the way for now. So is it better to leave it blank and elaborate when asked?
>>34344461you can just put employed, it's not a big dealbut also, sorry to be cynical but you probably won't have to worry about getting far with anyonemaybe like 10 people max are looking for something serious
>>34342167>i feel like a sex pest freak dming a bunch of girlsI know, but ignore it. Hell will freeze over before women start to message guys. Don't know why that is, but it really seems hardcoded into biology. It's interesting and bizarre
>>34344309>triple messagingunjustified crashout, blocked
>>34343347>>34343431I'm out of the equation since I have hidden my account, but I suppose it would be a novelty. Having it as a sub bonus like the other Anon suggested.Maybe if the feed was improved so that you would get a better idea of the profile at a glance. The badges were a good addition in regards of that.Have you considered making a separate field for the field? Like 200 character limit tweet or something? I notice a lot of women just upload the same picture or abuse the description editing to get visibility in the feed. I would imagine tweets in the feed to be better conversation starters
>>34344520right? so testerical
>>34344472You're not sorry to be cynical, all of your posts so far have been negative and you want to spread your bad mood. That's why I don't trust your advice
>>34344544up yours, wagie
>>34343613Put the ability to link your Youtube to your profile many of us 4chan chuds also are terminally online on YouTube by far our 2nd most used website besides this Chinese Cartoon forum. Also it helps femoids to learn more about us before coming to a consensus because you know how women are, so indecisive but always hypergamist.
>>34344461If you're even considering the matter, put your trade or profession in a general sense. Men don't care about the job and while a woman might, most if not all on the site are NEETs, so go figure.>>34344472Hush, schizo! Don't drag other Anons to your level. They still have a future ahead of them.To >>>/d/iscord with you
>Make the feed into Twitter>Youtube integration nao!
>>34344562>the scrotes here still have a future ahead of themlol, lmao evenyou're all doomed
By the way, skipping someone in dark mode still makes the tile white. Looks like it's not intended
>>34344520>>34344542Same color ID = samefag.Feel free to ignore my good advice and remain spinster forever LOL
DO NOT add recent visitors This "dating" app is blackpilled enough
>>34344687>Same color ID = samefagretarded!if i remain a spinster forever you will remain crippled and unloved forever also, our fates are tied :)
>>34344628Thanks. It's fixed on the web app. The mobile apps will take a few days to update
>>34343347I don't mind seeing a number but I do not want to see the actual people who looked at my profile and decided not to message me, that just induces misery.
>>34344926>>34343347do it!!!! mwahahahaha
>>34344718We men can attract fertile mates well unto our 50s if need be. You cant say the same. Time is on our side, yet you are the ones wasting all the time. Care to explain?
>>34344964>We men can attract fertile mates well unto our 50s if need be.thanks for the laugh, i needed that
>>34344964I cannot tell if this is really high quality bait or you have comparable IQ to a gorilla
>>34343347Do it. I think it's a good feature. People bitched about adding the reply/response rates now they're part of the app's culture.When will we be able to make posts on the feed? Hiki's userbase is garbage (honestly worse than here), but some of the features on the app are praiseworthy.
>>34344785If I gave details for my inactive account, would you send the login thingy to the email it has?Honestly going a little schizo so maybe I changed the mail right before I lost everything, but I'm not sure.
>>34344972>>34344977Not an argument
>>34345023you are here trying to get some gashthe young fertile women going for older men are going for the successful ones with money and charm that retained their good looks and haireven if you trick some 18 year old when you're 50 you'll just make some retards with your genetically defective spermwhat a legacy!
>>34345036>if you breed too late, your kids might come out like me!I agree that would be sub-optimal, but still better than never. How's your eggs anyway? Ya freeze?
>>34345121that was a huge self-own on your part btwwhy are you worried about my eggs anyway?
>>34345175Because I like you and I want the best for you
>>34345219thank you
>>34345023Okay it's bait you did pretty good until that. Try to be more subtle next time.
>>34344964Sperm actually degenerates at the same rate as eggs, but it's the carrying children part that causes women to not have kids later in life. Men having kids in their 50s will produce low quality sperm, and there is a much higher chance for birth defects and causing a fetus to not be able to be carried to term.
>>34344972Cope harder, also YWNBAW and they will never accept you
>>34345251i'm no trannysorry to burst your bubble but lucky for you, /soc/ is a bussy buffet faggot!
>>34310923Posted about this once before already but idc. I had the greatest period of my life because of duo and ending the relationship I found from it has completely ruined me. I don't mean to bawww too much but I'd go anything to be back in my little world with her. We were both PhD's and madly in love and I let ideology get in the way. Anons, love is possible here. Just keep trying. If she reads this, I love you. For the rest of you anons, just keep grinding. It pays dividends like you wouldn't believe.
>>34344964>men can attract fertile mates well unto our 50s if need bet. psyop'd into forgoing love and parenthood until it's too latemany such cases>>34344986>>34344539>When will we be able to make posts on the feed? Hiki's userbase is garbage (honestly worse than here), but some of the features on the app are praiseworthy.Hiki's interface is definitely prettier. I'm certainly no UI designerA few people have asked for the ability to post directly to the feed, so maybe I should bump it up on the list of priorities. Although I wonder if it'd be better to focus on the quality of feed results first, maybe by adding adding likes to the feed and ranking results by that>>34344988I'll give you a censored email address. Send your request to support@duolicious.app>>34344557Do you mean you want YouTube links to be pressable?
>>34344964Uh sure but you know sperm starts to go funky for men in their 40s-50s, you are gonna end up with downy kids no matters how young the wife is
>>34346734Seems to much for the feed, right now it's more natural, imagine that reddit upvote-whoring bullshit there once it's implemented.Temporary public group chats to join every 2 thursdays, saturdays or similar would seem good.
>>34346734Im not forgoing shit! Friendly reminder this whole exchange began with me urging women to engage more earnestly in conversation. I brought up the age thing to bolster my point that women have shorter shelf life than men, thus they should be the ones feeling greater urgency toward finding a mate. Whether you wanna draw the line at 55 or 45 or 35 is irrelevant, you have to admit that much is true. At ANY age above 25, a man of equal age will have access to a wider age range of mates. So ladies, it's time to get serious and quit wasting everybody's time. You hurt yourselves the most.
>>34347362>urging women to engage more earnestly in conversationthey do, just not with youfearmongering won't make anyone rush to you btw
>>34347362lmaooo young women of our generation only like rich older men, not losers on 4chan like you. also, our gen is like the first time in history people take age gaps this seriously. ive seen people be cancelled and ruined reputation just for being 18 dating a 16 year old. there will be way less of that. and no ones falling for the ''women become undesirable after a certain age'' scare bait. milf is the most searched for porn category
>>34346734out of curiosity, what's the current ratio of men to women?
>>34347380>>34347407Post ring
>>34347575sure, post yours and your wife's first?
Why the fuck do I need to keep verifying? It’s the third time already this month. No I’m not from the UK.
>>34347588So my takeaway from this exchange is, you find it boring and pointless to converse politely and advance a relationship a man who is romantically interested in you (and presumably it's mutual?? since you haven't blocked him???), but you'll go back and forth for days with a stranger about why you're right, men are wrong, and nobody deserves you. I won't hold my breath for that ring pic, and neither should you. And you may as well quit throwing stones, since you post on a glass 4chan.
>>34347785>you find it boring and pointless to converse politely and advance a relationship a man who is romantically interested in youwhere is this fiction coming from? did you not read earlier in the thread??? i got rejected
>>34347785actually, fuck you. your post is just full of misinformation to get more information out of me/hoping i'll correct you. go away
>>34346734>A few people have asked for the ability to post directly to the feed, so maybe I should bump it up on the list of priorities.That would be appreciated. As I mentioned, there're women who actively try to be in the feed. While it feels fishy to me, it would be good to accommodate them in case they are genuine.On that topic, it would also be good to add duplicate image filter. It would encourage people to rotate the images a bit. As mentioned, I often see the same image spammed
>>34347028>Temporary public group chats to join every 2 thursdays, saturdays or similar would seem good.Sounds like a good idea. Are you a product designer or something?>>343475334.95:1. According to Similarweb, the gender ratio on 4chan itself is about 4.88. So the ratio might have plateaued unless Google Play starts recommending Duolicious to more normies. (Actually I've noticed it started promoting Duolicious to women in African countries. But I've since asked Google Play not to promote it there)Even though the ratio is poor, it's still about as good as it's ever been. In Duolicious' first few months, when only /soc/ knew about it, the ratio was about 10:1. At the Twitter raid's peak, the ratio was about 20:1Fun fact: if you only count verified users, the ratio is 9.15:1. Although that seems to be improving. It might get down to 8-point-something to one in a few weeksLive-updated stats are on the home page or here:https://api.duolicious.app/gender-stats
>>343475332:22:1 is the ratio for users who signed up in the past day. The ratios in >>34349002 are for users who were active in the past 30 days. The difference between the ratios measured over different durations is because women leave at a faster rate than men. I don't do exit surveys, so I don't know how many women are leaving because they didn't like Duolicious, or because they're finding partners more easily than the men are.
>>34349024Hey Duolicious father, what's your favorite color?
>>34349002>I've since asked Google Play not to promote it thereWhy not?
>>34349002Glad you like the idea. Quite spot on - product design is one of my passions.Here's another:>>34349024>I don't do exit surveysChanging status from single, and on exit survey (account deletion, etc.) on selection of success user should be prompted to do a donation or later - saving link to notes for donating whenever it is more appropriate.
>>34349002>In Duolicious' first few months, when only /soc/ knew about it, the ratio was about 10:1Yes, but it also had the best selection of people back then
>>34349684This. The ratio might be better, but there's significantly less REAL women (as in, most of them are catfish), and a large handful of the real women are not looking for dates.
>>34347575no i just turned 18 and i have no plans of marriage
>>34347407>lmaooo young women of our generation only like rich older men, not losers on 4chan like youKek, gen z girls actually love older losers much more than millenial girls. Grinding for the rich men is mindset of older generations
>>34350755 Proof ? im a young girl, I predominately exist within young girl groups and they all think age gaps are disgusting and illegal. >Grinding for the rich men is mindset of older generationsBe serious. Older generations were limited by their class and only interacted with their own circles. they did not have access or the means to grind rich men. most were controlled by their family as well and ended up marrying family friends in the same class their father or something chose. With the new internet, all those class distinctions and boundaries have largely dissolved. everyone can inter mingle now with one tender swipe. Anyone can blend in with anyone with makeup. Hypergamy is far more common in this technological world
>>34349195And my mother's maiden name?>>34349218They're not very chronically online>>34349877>there's significantly less REAL women (as in, most of them are catfish)I strongly doubt that. Though the app's definitely become more normified, sadly. I guess the solution would be to lurk 4chan-related clubs. Ideally the matching algorithm would be smarter about filtering the normies without too much user intervention
>>34350875I'd buy my African gf's father a goat and she'd be down for life
>message women>try to act interested and outgoing>all responses are single sentences >no thought whatsoeverThese chicks don't actually want to have a conversation. Don't even respond to a message if you're not going to use more than 5 words. i'd rather just be ghosted than have my time wasted.
>>34351377Did you really expect anything to work?The only thing this website has proven is that sperg women don't exist.
>>34351447Women are just using this as a pick-me-up to make themselves feel more desired (same as all dating apps). Even the ones who say they just want someone to chat with evidently aren't interested in talking to anyone.
>>34351447>>34351494>sperg women don't existDid you miss the one that has nearly 100 posts ITT
Just passing through the official thread to drop a report/thanks.Figure most of you are in the same boat I was, so maybe this helps some anon out there. >be me, 24yo autist >KV (kissless virgin) >completely blackpilled, thought it was ngmi >saw this app shilled here, installed it with zero hope, mostly for the lulzThe fucking thing actually worked!!!! Used the app for a single month and managed to meet the girl whose I'm now in a serious relationship with. Been four months.She's not perfect (she's mentally ill, have a few self-inflicted scars on her thighs and chest, and other shit I'm not going to detail), but we are addicted to each other and happy with that.Just wanted to give a genuine thanks to the dev. You built the impossible: a dating app that isn't a goddamn meatgrinder. The whole Q&A matching mechanic is based as hell. It actually attracts girls who are compatible with you. For guys who aren't Chads, this is the only thing I've seen that gives you a fighting chance. Just learn how to properly communicate! (I trained my chatting skills using AI, 100% recommend, it also massively improved my grammar)Keep your heads up, anons.WAGMI.
>>34351731Shit nobody cares aboutbro shut the FUCK up and gtfoh
>>34351737I was just posting something nice and bro got offended. :\
>>34351731>have a few self-inflicted scars on her thighs and chest
>>34345246while it is true, its also not equal, a female's ovum production is quite limited, only about 400-500 eggs in a lifetime, where men produce millions of sperm per day, and they have to compete, damaged and deformed sperm do will lose to healthy sperm, so even if the avg quality is lower the real world impact is minimal, as such the rates for down symdrome for a higher maternal age is much higher than for higher paternal ages. that said you shouldnt wait too long , because overall male fertility drops, and most men at 50 are not chads.
This app is full of catfish, trannies, and e-girls who like to pretend women can be incels.
>>34351758It's one guy trying to spread a bad vibe, ignore him
>>34351731I've also met some nice young women despite being a 40yo broke alcoholic. Good luck in your relationships, warrior!
>>34351731ok
why isn't there a diaper club why can't I find my padded malewife here
>>34352044Yeah... Her teenage years were complicated. The positive is that there aren't many and they are barely visible.
>>34353421>>34351731Why are you posting that about her? she should come here and post what's wrong with you, tripfag
>>34353424You just made me realize I did something wrong, I shouldn't have posted those details.
>>34351377>single sentencesWell la di da, Mr. Multi-Word Reply
>>34353453even besides those details the two of you are clearly not healthy.you're oversharing, you're sharing 'bad parts' and not 'but she's better/working on it/etc now' or even 'that doesn't matter to me/we're going to work on it together,' I'm also going to go out on a limb and say you're taking the relationship too fast. your lingo is also a bit internet fried, but that could just be an affect/persona for 4chan.I'm happy for you kid, but I want you to be careful. not 'be careful of her,' be careful that you're not overlooking relationship friction from both her and YOU. get additional perspectives and be prepared in case you get "you need to slow down and do work on yourselves first" as an answer.
>>34354773>the two of you are clearly not healthysorry that was more aggressive than I was trying for, "your descriptions make it seem unhealthy" is probably better
>>34353421she sounds sick in the head
>>34354884He explicitly said that she is. What is the point of your post?
I'm a man and obviously have never received a single intro in over a year. That is, until a few days ago, when a catfish/bot problem has begun to emerge. Duo is sliding into the toilet of dating apps
>>34355974I manually checked the verified one, and I'm confident she's not fake. She's just African. The rest really are bots. I'm not sure what to do about them. They mostly sign up from VPNs. I've tried blocking VPNs but I can't find a reliable way to do it which won't cost too much. I'm currently using FireHOL's IP lists and what you see are the results. Someone suggested blocking by ASN instead of IP address, which I could investigate more.
>>34356052>I'm confident she's not fake. She's just African.some are both, i messaged this one and she said she was the white chickcaptcha OWWWV4
>>34356052You will have a lot of bots. This is inevitable and no one can fight them, not even large platforms.Some bots and real prostitutes from your city are so desperate that they will look for clients on Duo. That's how I met one prostitute who just registered on random dating apps lol. You must add a convenient and fast reporting functionality for users.
I have the feeling this is a good feature that's somehow going to cause a lot of problems
>>34357940I love it cause I can easily see when women didn't care enough to respond to my intros, but cared enough to take a look
Oh fuck oh shit I don't want people to see that I looked at their profile
There is not a chance on earth I am keeping this if men can see that I opened their profiles. I have already had guys create multiple profiles to ask why I skipped them. The last thing they need is more ammo.
it feels like when youre staring at someone in public and they look up and notice you staring at them and then its awkwardhow am i going to secretly keep tabs on the people who live near me now
>>34358269Anything that make foids more paranoid is basedbased feature
>>34358312Not wanting to be spammed does not equal paranoid.Unfortunately for you, and as DuoDaddy knows, the only way to keep a dating app alive is to cater to women. The ratio is already abysmal on there, and I would be surprised if this helps at all.
i obsessively check the profiles of every girl that has ever sent me an intro since they all ghosted (aside from the black ones) and now they can all see fuckfuckrfuckfuckfuckFUCK
>>34358349The only way to keep a dating app alive is to cater to women, but the ultimate goal is to help lonely men find a woman
i was gonna come into here to complain about the profile view feature but i messaged someone that viewed my profile without sending an intro and they are already talking to me better than anyone else i've messaged in weeks, seems like my choice of finding women is poor and i gotta let them find me instead
dev, can you lower the weighting on the feed algorithm a bit? I've seeing the same 5 updates that the high match rates I already know about made a week ago.
>>34358269>woman doing anything more than the bare minimum challenge [IMPOSSIBLE!]Oh boo hoo you need to block a few more people than you already do. I can see why you're still here and not drowning in Chad-brand cock like all the other girls.
>>34358696How is any of this related to what I said? Are you implying that having to block more people is "doing anything more than the bare minimum?" That's a bizarre line of thought.
>>34358696She can't even comprehend what you're trying to tell her, lol, as if she has some kind of mental block
>>34358908Me:>I think this change is going to make the app less appealing for women and cause them to leave.The response:>Do more than the bare minimum. Block more people. No wonder you're single.How do you not see that that isn't a response to what I said?
>>34358165>>34358269>>34358294>>34358429"Hide me from strangers" applies to the "Visitors" tab too, even if you apply it *after* visiting someoneI might add specific privacy settings just for the Visitors tab and the feed next>>34358587The reason you're seeing the same results is that it's showing you who's online recently. Some people leave themselves logged in all the time. It's challenging to show feed results of comparable quality to mainstream apps - They get to choose from 100x more content to promote
>>34358429>i obsessively check the profiles of every girl that has ever sent me an introAlso, only your latest visit is shown. So the only way they can tell you visited multiple times is if they're obsessively checking their visitors
>Can't stalk dudes I like anymore (Fuucking rip)>Can see every dude I talked to who still visits (I did not need to see that)Aggressive feature. Invasive. This will discourage people from looking at profiles t.b.h.
>>34359060>"Hide me from strangers" applies to the "Visitors" tab too, even if you apply it *after* visiting someone >I might add specific privacy settings just for the Visitors tab and the feed nextOk this is fine then. That sounds a lot different.
>>34359137Seethe
>>34359137this man has been checking my profile every couple minutes for the entirety of this night and im afraid to check the messages and itll say i viewed his profile or something
>>34343529oh god i got a visitorno intromake it stop, i dont want to know
>>34359215>every couple minutes for the entirety of this nightIs the timestamp changing, or is it just notifying you more than once?>im afraid to check the messages and itll say i viewed his profileIt shouldn't do that. You need to visit the profile itself>>34359240Are you an anon, or femanon?
Uh, I just wanna brag and say I met the guy of my dreams on this hellish site and we're gonna have our first year anniversary of being together in a couple of days.Thanks duodaddy.
Attention: duolicious user anxiety levels have been increased by 200%, you have been warnedNext step: adding a karma system
>>34359250the timestamp indeed was changing he finally went to sleep i think though as it stopped updating after like 5 hours of it constantly notifying me
the new visitors feature gives me mixed feelingson one hand, I can easily track profiles I sent intros to recently, but on the other hand, women can now see the precise minute that I see their profile compared to if or when I send an intro, which sabotages my chances when considering a few profiles that say they're under construction because now it makes me look weird for waiting, and it also just makes me feel creepyadditionally, my profile has four visitorsthe first three are women who I sent an intro to but was neither skipped nor replied to, and the fourth is someone who requires verified photos to view, and so I am at their mercy without ability to skip them unless they decide to send an intro to me firstI always kind of thought it was weird that you could be allowed to require photo verification on this app in particular, I think the tradeoff is that you shouldn't be allowed to interact with people of a lower verification status or something, it just feels weird not to have that control simply for not having a photo of myselfI also think it's just plain annoying to have my entire normal search feed filled with unskippable profiles that require me to photo verify to open and maybe one other profile that was last online two days ago with a single image and no bio
>>34359252I'm cursing you right now, my curses tend to be pretty effective
>>34359250I'm a dude.>>34359284might've been a refreshing tab in the background?
is this feature only on the web app/ios? no update for Google Play
If someone's location is private, does that mean they are still in my location range?
>>34359415Yeap, only for web version>>34359418Nope, tested it several times. This is kinda unfortunate for me
>>34359252I like hearing stories like that, so thanks>>34359284I wonder if something like this anon >>34359410 says is happening, or if it's a bug>>34359415Only web for now. The App Store and Play Store have time-wasting review processes which can take days, so I like to test changes on the web app first to see if there's any bugs or if most people like the changes. The mobile apps will probably get updates in the next few days>>34359418If you're finding them in search, yes. Elsewhere in the app, no
>>34359475I like the change but it is demoralizing to see 7 visitors with no intros. Either my profile sucks or people just have unreal levels of shyness
>>34359475I met a nice girl on the website and was planning on meeting her but now I have metastatic lung cancer and I'm going to fucking die and it's going to destroy her.Thanks a lot dick head.
>>34359475It's weird right now that people who use the app do not even know that browser users are being told when they visit their profiles.
>>34359215>this man has been checking my profile every couple minutes i'd be into that personally
>>34359645i am but he also scares me a bit hes way more into our conversation than the other men have been and im just hesitant and jaded idk atleast hes nice for now
>>34359650>but he also scares me a bitinto that too, but yeah I don't blame you
>>34359650You know you can always just use the skip option if you're not into him, right? That will archive the conversation and he won't see your profile anymore. I've done that to several women, and several women have done that to me. It's not a big deal.
im gonna leave my browser open with an autoclicker on the refresh button every 2 minutes on this girl's profile before I go on a 3 day road trip
now that my stalk has been xposed. I'm gonna rape you.
>>34358269If you don't like a guy, just skip him then and there, it saves the two of you a lot of trouble. Most will just assume you left.
Glad for this, makes the mass skipping spree I'm about to go on even easier. I didn't want to jump the gun and skip someone who may have been interested, but I see now that risk simply isn't there.
In response to some of the butthurt in this thread, there's an extra privacy setting now:>Browse InvisiblyIt does what it says.Profiles you browsed invisibly will have a ghost icon beside them in the "Visitors" tab.Also, privacy filters now no longer apply retrospectively, as I mentioned here >>34359060. The setting used is the one you had applied at the time you were visiting the profile. So if you want to temporarily make yourself invisible to lurk a specific profile, you can do that now.The "Browse Invisibly" setting has some overlap with the "Hide Me From Strangers" option, so you might want to enable just one or the other.I think I'm going to look into the bots next >>34355974
>>34360112Forgot the pic>>34360112>mass skipping spreeDuolicious has only been keeping record of visitors for about 3 days, if that makes any difference
>>34359654>>34359645Let me stalk you schizo-chan
>>34360117>In response to some of the butthurt in this thread, there's an extra privacy setting now:I love your attitude. I mean that, I may stick around your app even if I find someone (I have a date tomorrow) just because of your attitude.
>>34360254>mfw
>>34310923For the love of fuck, please remove the stupid verified accounts bullshit. If this is truly a website for 4channers, then it should be ok or even encouraged to only have an account with a pfp instead of your face. We can show face on discord or whatever. Literally half the profiles are locked behind verification, it's fucking stupid. Just make it like soc or discord where it's personality driven instead of just like every other shitty dating app
>>34361125Let different people interact with each other. You don't need to interact with verified people with this mindset, interact only with anime avatars from 4chan
>>34361125You're right. It would've been nice to have one dating app that doesn't rely on normalfagging with pictures of yourself in your profile. The verification system just caters to normies who don't even need apps to find someone
>>34361125>If this is truly a website for 4channers, then it should be ok or even encouraged to only have an account with a pfp instead of your face.>>34361230>The verification system just caters to normies4chan's always had "rate me" threads and people demanding "poast timestamp", especially on /soc/. You're also allowed to be anonymous on 4chan, but there's no rule against not being anonymous. It's similar with Duolicious - You don't have to deanonymize yourself, but sometimes people want to do that. Although it's possible to have Duolicious cater to one sub-group of 4chan users to the exclusion of others.>Just make it personality drivenDuolicious' matching algorithm is 100% personality-driven. But did you know relationships between similarly physically attractive people tend to last longer? Do you think Duolicious' algorithm should start taking attractiveness into consideration, to produce more stable relationships, or do you think Duolicious should ignore looks anyway because that's too shallow?Fun historical fact: Duolicious originally didn't have verification. The majority of users didn't complain about it, and some even praised that aspect. But they were pretty vocal about the problems it caused, like there being too many catfish accounts, or the gender ratio being poor. Could you suggest ways to improve those problems without verification? Or do you think some other users care too much about those things?
>>34362331The rate me thread has nothing to do with the dating threads though. People don't post pictures of themselves on there. They add each other on discord, get to know each other and then swap pictures. I think you should cater to the core demographic. If people still want to add pictures of themselves, fine. But I'm not fond of the verification system. It really does just filter out channers who aren't comfortable with posting their face. This just makes it like every other dating app. People should at least get a chance to talk and then swap pictures. I get your concerns with bots and catfish but that's happening anyway, I just feel like it punishes privacy minded people or wards them off
>>34362416I found a post on /adv/ just a few hours before yours about the lack of pictures>>>/adv/33725966>just feel like it punishes privacy minded people or wards them offtbqh senpai, I don't understand why you just not get verified and ignore the users who want you to be verified. They'd likely ignore you too. Would you like extra filters to make that easier?
>>34362620Duolicious father why are there clubs like a bdsm club but there's no diaper club. Why can't there be a diaper club? Are clubs makeable?
>>34362331>Could you suggest ways to improve those problems without verification? Or do you think some other users care too much about those things?I did some spitballing earlier in this post >>34359394I think it explains, though perhaps not exhaustively, the awkwardness of the current system and something that I would consider to be a moderate solution that I didn't refine too much for the sake of provoking thought rather than definitively solving the issues presented
>>34362620I'd like a filter to hide verified people. Anyone stupid enough to do that isn't someone I want to date.
>>34362620i hit the intro limit somehow just by trying to send an intro over and over again trying to get around the 'rude' filter, please fix
>>34362620because of what one person on /adv/ said? i thought you were smarter than that, duodude. you just want to see all our faces, this is a honeypot isn't it
>>34362331>especially on /soc/counterpoint, I'm not from /soc/ and I find most of /soc/'s behavior (read 'catalog') abhorrent.
>>34362649You can be as paranoid as you want but I'm not stupid, there's very little downside in my being verified.
>>34361125Deleted my profile already because of this verify bs. Literally everyone I’ve met (irl) through duo deleted their account as well. Rip duo, 2024 was your golden year.
>>34362895The number of normies (usually with photos) who don't even know anything about femcels and incels has really become quite large, but it's always funny to talk to them
>>34362626Sorry. There were too many people pedobaiting with it. The problem with pedobaiting is that it attracts real pedos, and I don't want to deal with that shit>>34359394>>34362649>>34362738>>34362743>>34362860The challenge with giving both groups of users what they want is that nobody would get verified if the unverified people weren't encouraged to get verified somehow, which involves annoying the people who don't want to get verified. But if few people get verified, then the people who want verification will be annoyed. Not sure how to please everyone completely>>34362895>Deleted my profile already because of this verify bsAren't you that "girl" I banned for catfishing?(reposting cuz typos)
>>34362895>mass twitter influx>goldengo back
>>34363021oh that makes sense it's just a shame I'll never meet my padded malewife here
>right the visitor thing is up now>no visitors>update profile>change out image>wait a day>no visitorsthis isn't good for my health
if i visit someone's profile and skip them do i show up in their Visited tab or nah
>>34363021I donated $50 awhile back, I think I'll do it again. Thanks dev for all the work your doing here. I like the direction you've been steering this ship, and it has been fun watching it evolve. I also appreciate that you appear to a man of principles who has held to them. Really, if not this place, then it's the demons from matchgroup.I genuinely think this is about to hit critical mass and blow up for you. 2026 is the year of duo.
I think I see the purpose of this website. These profiles i'm seeing...holy fuck. I didn't even try with mine and mine still looks better than most.
>>34363762I'm even afraid to imagine how many femcels will be in your intros with such a good looking profile. Just leave for us at least a few women, okay?
>>34363776Not that many actually. Although the closest women that i've seen are all at least a state away, so there isn't much opportunity for me.
Wow, a visitor. let's see wh-
I get visitors but they're all straight menwhy are straight men looking at my male profileI don't want to talk to people who are so stupid they expect to find a gf on a 4chan app
Okay, I think the hot girl (feds) well has dried up for me. A few responses, but leads to 1 word responses to any attept to follow up on conversation.I don't get what the fuck I'm supposed to do oram doing wrong.
I like the visitors feature, it encourages you to navigate other peoples profiles in the hopes that they check your profile out aswell, it's a shame this wasnt added long ago, I think it would've sped things up a lot
>>34365120Report here when it actually works. Personally, I often check the profiles of duocels I'll likely never message to.
>>34362331>like there being too many catfish accounts.I think this is just a risk people will have to accept, just like on /soc/. Just don't be dumb about it and you should be fine. If you want to use a normie app they're right there. >or the gender ratio being poor.I don't see how this attracts more women. If anything I think they'd prefer to stay anon when surrounded by high risk creepy guys so they can vet the good ones vpm
>>34310923When will I be able to put myself as a tranny and filter for other trannies? I don’t wanna appear amongst women or see a bunch of cissoids when I’m trying to find a hot dickgirlGrindr and Taimi are the only apps that understands this
>>34365522
if a chick reads your intro and doesn't respond, messaging her again shouldn't count against your intro limitskip or get spammed, simple as
>>34366142BasedJeetmax on that ho>hello dearie?>are you able to read these messages?>I do hope that no disaster has befallen you>do you still have access to this account?
All the girls I chatted with on Duo have become to be online more often, they've stopped talking to me and are now checking in with their visitors like dopamine drug addicts and chatting with them. Thanks, Duodaddy
>>34363021I think this account is a scammer. They asked me 1 question and then asked for my phone number to send me nudes, and when I declined she asked for telegram
>>34367065yeah any generic looking hot girl with a real name is just a catfish. they usually address you by your profile name too like it's your real name lol.
>>34367080she kinda mid tho lol
Talked to a priest today about scheduling our wedding.It all started with a 4chan ad
>>34367372Congratulations, anon!Any details of the successful match/convo?
>>34310923I sent u an email like 4 days ago and never got a replyalso hide my profile cuz of the views thing and im paranoid
>>34363552Do you still have a donation page? I couldn't find it.
>>34367372Congrats, anon>>34367827Are you the person who said their response rate doesn't update? Is the request that you'd like the number updated? I'm not sure what you expect it to be. I'm pretty sure it's right>>34367879I don't recommend donating anymore because Duolicious started selling subscriptions to new users about a month ago. That's why there's no nag screen or death counter anymore. Subscriptions aren't covering the bills yet, but they probably will in a few months. If you still insist on donating to cover that shortfall, the old ko-fi page still works:https://ko-fi.com/duoliciousbtw, does anyone know how many 4chan passes are sold per month? I'm wondering how they can afford to sell them for $30/year. That's a pretty good deal. I imagine it's only possible because they're in the world's top 1000 websites. Things get cheaper at scale
>>34367372duodaddy is responsible for a generation of autistic children
>>34367372Bait
>>34368205u forgot to switch IPs, silly what's duodude's loredo you think he is responsible for some of the bots on this board/site, if so, which ones?personally, i'm a big fan of >Swooped in to see if these threads were still going. Just wanted to say I've been with the girl I met on Duo for over a year now, shit has been pretty cash.You can all make it bros, I believe.
>>34368106
>>34368257I'll admit it. I samefaggged that anon's post so it'll look better in the screencap>>34368284They still need to pay their bills though. I wonder how many 4chan passes it takes
>>34368320caught red-handednow i think you made that post too
>>343683204chan is primarily funded by the US and Israeli government, maybe Russians and the Chinese. It's obvious with how shadowy the moderation is and how every new change does nothing but help glowies (ex: removing ip counts)
>>34368350I am, in fact, arguing with one of my many bots
>>34368364>but help glowies (ex: removing ip counts)half of the people who ever posted about the ip count had no idea how it actually worked and were just shitposting
wtf
>>34368427wrong thread ufck
>>34359495Likely the latter.t. Never sent an intro even once out of fear of rejection
>>34369437sometimes instead of messaging a girl i like, ill send a girl a mean message insteadit makes me laugh and i feel better
>>34369437I got three intros so far one was a catfish and two were people who I don't think have ever spoken to a human being before.I am curious though are you supposed to be able to actually see what they say before you skip them? It doesn't seem like you're able to in the app but I can from notifications
>>34369437I don't want to send an intro so as not to ruin replies to my intro statistics so that women don't see me as unwanted among other women. We are not the same
>>34369667duodaddy, this is a behavior your should want to disincentivize. maybe think about replacing the gets-replies-to % with a number which doesn't penalize guys who are clearly being selective and high-effort in the intros they send out.
>>34370841Then your response rate should be high if you are being selective and sending high-effort messages. This works in your favour. It's people mass-sending low quality intros who have low numbers.
>>34371082>Then your response rate should be high if you are being selective and sending high-effort messagesi'm not disputing that, but if guys are hesitant to send out intros to girls they otherwise like for fear of losing pretend internet points then it's not an ideal situation. one way to amend this is to tell anons to stop caring so much about pretend internet points, and i have no issue with anyone doing this. an additional way to do this is to better align the distribution of pretend internet points with desired behaviors. the really bad outcome you might have here is girls who WOULD respond to high-effort intros from selective users, but high-effort users don't message them because they have a 0% reply rate.
>>34371123If a girl has a 0% reply rate, it doesn't matter how good your message is. She clearly isn't interested in actually talking with anyone.Agreed that it can encourage those types of behaviours about fake internet points though. I also think a lot of reply rates are skewed because assuming other women get similar messages to me, 90% of them are just some variation of "what's up" which isn't really worth responding to, so my reply rate makes me look far more selective than I am.I'd actually love a requirement that intros had to be a certain amount of characters/words. I'm sure some people will just spam to reach it, but it might help people realize they should send more than a few words.
>>34371221>I'd actually love a requirement that intros had to be a certain amount of characters/wordsbooi wanna be able to send "gesundheit" to girls with weird namesthat said: r9k mode should go both ways for both parties' first message so that men get more than "lmao" every time
Are these filters too strict? I have messaged everyone worth messaging (2 people) who have met these that don't have verified only profiles (frankly if you're posting your real face on here and only expecting to talk to other people who do the same I'd consider you not worth messaging either).Within 600 milesNot: Black/Unanswered raceNot: Christian, Muslim, JewishHas a profile pictureDoesn't do drugsAge: 18-26Gender: Man, Woman, Femboy, Trans
swooped in to see if this thread was still goingi met someone who seems to match my freak and we will meet irl soonif it does not work out, i will be back (or on the news) wagmi (except those who have harmed me, you are cursed for all eternity)^~^
>>34371259No one can answer that for you. It's all personal preference. However, it you're female and looking for something serious, men in the 26+ range are way more likely to be looking for the same.I would also ask if you consider alcohol and weed to be drugs. To me, I'm way more concerned about any kind of mind-altering prescription medications than I am either of those, but to each their own.
>>34371242Responses don't count as a first message which is why I'm guessing that applies. /r9k/ mode for all messages would be a benefit, honestly.>>34371259If you aren't in/near a major city, the distance is probably going to be the biggest factor here. Also if you're American and wanting to avoid Christians.
I can't believe this turned out to be a legitimate dating site. Also how does search work now? I thought it used to be as simple as everyone that qualifies in the two-way filters, then just listed in order of match %, but now I can't find anyone that's non-verified without putting more specific filters with people that clearly have a higher match %. Lastly, what motivates people to send an intro to a literal blank profile?
>>34371843All messages would be a bit much, I'd be annoyed if I couldn't just say LMAO when someone said something funny after we've already been talking for a good 30 minutes. Just the initial response would be fine.
>>34367425I really sent three first messages to her.I joined the site in 2023. After months of nothing promising, one morning in early 2024 I saw a new profile that really intrigued me. After thinking about her for the whole morning I sent her a question that I thought she’d respond to positively. Her response was so detailed and thought-out and formed the basis of the most amazing conversation I’d ever had. We kept talking from there until we tried a discord call six days in and I completely spilled my spaghetti. She politely turned me down. The end.…until a few months later when I couldn’t get her out of my mind. Her response to the question I’d asked was so good that it became my meter. I used variants of that question for almost every match on dating apps (both this and conventional ones) and no one ever measured up to her. I wanted another chance. I doxxed her with info I’d gleaned from our conversation and messaged her on linkedin. She rejected me again.Early this year a profile with a different name (the first one was a fake name too) showed up but after reading her profile I immediately knew it was her. I thought about just letting her be, but what was the harm in getting rejected again? It was so generous of her to even respond. We called much sooner than the first time and it went perfectly. I bought plane tickets two weeks later.She was still skeptical until the day we really met. I planned to ask her to be my girlfriend on the fourth day, but the night of our first date was so perfect that I asked her right then.We spent another week together two months later, and then another week in my city the next month. Neither of us can stand being apart so we’ve agreed that it simply makes too much sense to get married and move in as soon as we can. I’ll formally propose after I meet her family this Thanksgiving, but we’re scheduling the wedding seven months out. I love her so much.>>34368320Why did you xeet this and then delete it
>>34372242everyone who fits your filters, whos filters you also fit, and is 50% or above show up in searcheveryone who fits your filters who has a matching club shows up in club searchfeed is everyoneI've considered sending messages to people with blank profiles but are <demographics I'm looking for> because they had decent match percentages and Q&A answers; but they all seem to have left a bit ago or somehow say verified pics only. which I didn't know you could set without having verified pics.
when i filtered by a club i saw results in the 70s that i never saw before despite my normal list going to 50%.did i never notice them or could the question filters be turned off when looking at clubs?
>>34372577they are filtering you out. in normal search, it only shows people if BOTH conditions are met: they meet YOUR filters, and you meet THEIR filters.so they are looking for people closer or younger or etc. than you are.
>>34372705will they never see an intro i send
Girls get even more visitors than intros, no one will ever visit me back... It's even more over now, anons
>>34328426Which video are you talking about? The YouTube one where that guy goes looking for a femcel?
>>34310923does it only have a community in america?i'm in eu...
>>34373050almost all of the girls ive interacted with or sent intros to is european
>faggot with an app that has absolutely no bitches trying to scam desperate dudesmany such cases, I hope you choke on curry you filthy fucking jeet
>>34373435hey anon we might be desperate dudes and there might be no bitches on there but at least duodaddy doesn't charge us extortionate amounts like literally any other alternative
>>34373502He’s selling your fucking data
>>34372296So what you're saying is stalking and harassment work?
>>34373622literally everyone isthe fucking sidewalk is selling your data
>>34373622A cellphone is far more dangerous to your privacy than anything on duo :)
>try duo for the first time at the start of summer>there’s ONE woman in a 500 mile radius >what a waste of time >check back today after remembering it exists>the number has gone up to three within that radius what a waste of time
M22 just woke up bored and horny as fuck. Pls hmu and send anything at all to help me out with my morning wood. Make me throb and goon to whatever sexy stuff you send. I’ve been trying to quit porn but show me the stuff keeping me addicted. Make me go even furtherPls hmu and send anything, I’m desperateSession0577967fc26cf2e7950ff43f71262951ea9750a9cb1d031556aff21c72e4eb5049
>>34371242That just means girls aren't gonna reply at all.
Am I the only one who always has the same 5 people in my feed very frequently?
>>34371259>le based racist pagan viking>pansexual degenerateNever fails LOL
>>34374127Retarded bait but even if I got along with blacks (far too culturally distinct) I just do not find them attractive at all+ far from Pagan and I probably dislike pagans more than abrahamics
>>34374629That anon didn't even mention black people. That's how much they live rent free in your head because you're obsessed yet still no one wants you from any group
>>34372296she just had to fuck a few other guys in that year gap before she was ready to settle down with youretard
>>34374744obsessed
>>34372296ok but what did you ask her
wtf is this visitors thing remove this shit
>>34375950Cope
>>34375950I will visit you every day, femanon. Every single day.
>see that someone has finally visited my profile>check out their profile>send an intro while they're still online>no responseat least it's confirmed that I'm unwanted
>18-19 years old>profile pic is from CSM or NSO>"kitten/puppy girl">"bedrot">heavy smoker and/or alcoholic>covered in tattoos>claims to be a gamer, only plays a hero shooter like Leagueit's like these bitches are assembled in a factory, there's so many of them
>>34373435>want to make a dating app that actually works>decides to replicate the exact failed model that every other dating app uses, stubbornly refuses to take advice that would actually make a functional site rather than a scam that only exists to extract money from lonely men
>>34378308>league>hero shooterbut otherwise dead on the money. don't forget BPD and at least three other debilitating mental illnesses
I'm actually so sick of women giving me nothing to work with. What am I even supposed to send as an intro to illicit a converstion.I tried jokes, I tried questions, I tried compliments, I tried teasing. All I ever get is the same cookie cutter responses.What the fuck is the point.
>>34378308Wait til you open xitter and see all the cloned bitches in there
>>34378394You get responses?
>>34377150 >>34378308 >>34378345 >>34378394 >>34379071God you idiots need to be culled. Stop scaring away the hoes. Ya'll're looking for boyfriends.
>>34379143Be quiet and keep donating paypiggy, I have fun scaring away the low tier hoes in this app
>>34378308>it's like these bitches are assembled in a factory, there's so many of themDude, it's called "industrial society" for a reason... Not even making a joke here. Child neglect and BPD are backed into the system
>scroll through feed>notice someone updated a block of text in japanese>wonder if it's an actual japanese anon>click on it>just a cliché weeb>makes sense>12h later notice that he visited my profile in returnDude! Do not cross the streams like that. You're making it weird.
>>34310923App doesn't load, is it finally dead?
>>34379613works on my machine
pls duodaddy give me the option to disable my visitor count badge. the bubble is messing with my digital hygeine.
>>34378320I think the cruel answer is what you are looking for doesn't exist, I uninstalled a while ago. I don't think there's an ulterior motive for money as it clearly is shrinking in users.There is no autismo gf.
Every other new profile is looking for hookups, this is worse than the time I went jogging in a carrot-plated suit in horseland
>>34310923Kinda fail to see the point of this if there's not really an userbase in my area
>>34335498>get into a relationship >give it everything I have, mental and physically >it still isn't enough and the woman just "has different needs" and leaves after 2 years>can't actually elaborate when asked about said needs and calls it a boundarymy fault, I guess.
>>34380219It's really troubling how many new normies here recently and looking for fun and hookup culture on Duolicious I'm starting to slowly agree with the opinion of anons who are against real photos and verification. I don't need this normie tinder tier bullshit.
>>34370841>maybe think about replacing the gets-replies-to % with a number which doesn't penalize guys who are clearly being selective and high-effort in the intros they send outI would've thought the "get replies" percentage would do that, but I guess not. How about also including the absolute number of replies received? Or maybe that's too intrusive. But something like that.>>34372242Search prefers to show you verified profiles when there's plenty of them which fit your search criteria. If your filters leave you with few options, the algorithm stops being so choosy about the verification thing>Lastly, what motivates people to send an intro to a literal blank profile?I don't know about other users, but I'd do it because:>low competition>they're probably as paranoid about their privacy as me>>34372296>Why did you xeet this and then delete itI delete unpopular tweets. One of the most popular ones in recent time was about me getting harassing emails from a disgruntled user>>34372912https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB1MgHgGAAM&t=125s>>34373622I'm not selling anyone's data. But I've been selling subscriptions for almost a month. It's hard to make money without paywalling matches/messages. Pic related. It might be another two months before I even make enough to pay monthly running costs. Actually more than that, because Apple and Google take a 15%-30% cut.>>34374045Yeah, I need to fix that, sorry>>34378320There was at least one guy in these threads who'd regularly make strongly worded, highly confident posts that if I try his suggestions, the gender ratio would be 1:1 and there'd be plenty of users. I can't remember what he said when I told him I'd already tried it and it didn't work. Anyway, what's your new suggestion?
>>34380056Not happening. Those badges and the visitors tab are saving the app from dying. Adding them increased visitors to Duolicious by about 30%, and traffic has almost doubled. Maybe I should add give in and add likes too. Likes would be one solution to this: >>34369667 >>34370841
>>34381037visitors are based I don't think you should cater to the socially inept autists because they're not messaging anyone regardless of what changes you make
Verifications are basedTwitter ads are basedReplay percentages are based Feed is basedVisitors are based---- YOU ARE HERE ----Paid subscriptions are basedPaid likes are basedRating lists are basedAlgorithms are basedAI profiles are basedThe sale of Duolicious to Match Group, Inc. is based
>>34381037>Maybe I should add give in and add likes too.duodaddy... you're going to rape me and a lot of other people with this functionality
sry im dum but i forgot to check back last time i asked this question, i promise ill check back this time :3how is that duo can verify stuff like my age and gender but NOT any of my photos? what does that even mean? also any tips on getting photos to verify? i already removed all my photos with different hair and added a recent, candid photo to my profile and tried AGAIN to verify but it still didnt work
>>34381037isnt that parasitic? if people are being "more active" on the site despite not wanting to see their visitor count, then youre farming fomo yeah? you really think thats best for the health of the site? i already support duo thru kofi i dont wanna be mindlessly checking this website because you wanna hack my brain for view counts. shit like this makes me wanna NOT visit this site. i liked this place cuz it was different than other dating sites. it wasnt scummy.
