6'1 18y/o
>>34861472Underage homosexual mutt you need to be 18+ to post on this tranny and fag board
does 18 not count as 18+ mate
Not my type but 8.5
>>34861472A bit zesty considering the eyebrow shape and DSL
>>34861472Totally my type.Ripped upper body, you look like you could give me insane backshots with your hands on my hips.Berserk tshirt? Killer.Face is hella blessed as well, haircut looks good though It's a little goofy, think you should show your forehead just a little more.10/10 young male king that I would let impregnate me and paint my deepest vital organs.
>>34861472bussin mulatto
>>34861472
>>348614725'9 28 incel
>>34861472Definitely chad potential
>>34861472you are dishonest, angle bitch. take a picture from the front and show us how narrow your shoulders and how wire your hips actually are.
6'1 hasn't been a good height in decades. It was in the 90's by 2000's that was 6'2 and 6'3 was the standard beyond 2010's.Women don't really care for "slightly above average height". Your face is average and you're buff. Its hard to tell what your rating is because it depends heavily on how much into body is a woman.If you were 6'4 or something you d be well above average looking but now you're a 6 or barely a 7
>>34864248Hot where do you live i have a vagina
>>34861472A good 6.5/10 i think. I'm a hetero male though
>>34870480An inverted ballsack over an axe wound is not a vagina lil nigga
>>34870324Weird way to ask for a succulent morsel of fembody but okay.
0/10ugly as fuck
>>34870426you're insane and mindfucked by instagram. 64% of the population will be average. it's a bell-curve. that'll never change. so what you're trying to express here means nothing. he's above average, slightly, and that does mean a lot in that context.
>>34870426>6'2 and 6'3 was the standard beyond 2010'swhere? brobdingnag? 6'2 and 6'3 aren't a "standard" anywhere. >>34862566that's disgusting
