[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/toy/ - Toys


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: channels4_profile (2).jpg (77 KB, 900x900)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
If you're a youtuber shilling on this board, (YOU) ARE GAY.

Thread theme: https://youtu.be/yeuc176cu8I

Latest Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKW9UXQR0A4
>>
Here's my package
>>
>>11650624
I get the impression that Anthony would honestly enjoy collecting fixed posed statues instead of action figures. It's obvious he prioritizes looks over articulation. He keeps constantly asking if they would prefer figures that have butterfly joints and separate neck joints over figures with no butterfly joints and neck sculpts fused to the torso and most people answer they prefer the former but he keeps asking the question over and over, hoping people change their answer to the latter.
>>
>>11650624
Why does he always complain when figures have limited articulation but then his poses at the end of the video are the most basic shit you will ever see?
>>
>>11652507
I wonder sometimes if he doesnt want to bother balancing when it comes to dynamic poses but that sounds too copey, he probably just doesnt care much. I think he puts most the work into the review itself. As much as he may whine I like his input.
>>
>>11652333
i would rather have butterflys than double elbows in most cases.
>>
>>11652333
He used to make such dope customs I thought “damn by the time I get my first job I’m going to commission a Deadpool custom with the sweet magnetic changeable parts” and then by the time I got my first job he stopped making customs and that was like 7 years ago (skull emoji)
>>
>>11650624
"This figure sucks, the articulation sucks. I'm giving it a 7 out of 10."
"This figure is pretty decent, the articulation is not bad. I'm giving it a 7 out of 10."
>>
>>11650624
>Tfw you think being nitpicky and hating on everything makes you a good critic
>>
File: niggers.png (147 KB, 370x557)
147 KB
147 KB PNG
Another group of wankers hatin' on King Tone. Fuck outta here with this petty bullshit. If you're gonna strike at the king you better kill the king.
>>
>>11652846
this

the price of a figure has the most impact on the grades he gives
>>
>>11654645
He's giving 60 dollar mcfarlanes 6-7/10s, anon
>>
>>11654838
6-7!!!
>>
His theme song is fucking badass albeit
>>
>>11654873
It's just fart noises.
>>
>>11652507
>wtf every figure should have a spiderman-like abcrunch so they can shove their head up their own ass
>proceeds to display every figure on his shelf in the most neutral pose imaginable
>>
>>11655220
he would have to use flight stands to do dynamic posing and he's lazy so he just uses poses the figures can do while still maintaining balance
>>
Anthony rules. Seethe, Hasbronies.
>>
why wont anthony review any valaverse figures?
>>
File: gaylord.jpg (83 KB, 1709x759)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
>>11650624
imagine still being religious in 2025.
>>
>>11650624
desu the only thing I can think of him doing that actually really annoyed me was when he got pissy about the jada sf figures not matching the super character select portraits. very reasonable for jada to not use the excessively stylized character portraits and go with something more neutral that maps to the ingame sprites.
>>
>>11658329
He doesn't review gi joes either
>>
>>11658691
>>
>>11658329
>>11658691
>>11658711

He reviews Joes here and there, and the Monster Force figs. He probably doesn't review Valaverse because they's not that good and doesn't want to shit on his friend's figures.
>>
>>11658711
Look at how many years ago. He doesn't really review them anymore.
>>
>>11658882
well he reviews monster force
>>
>>11652849
Only when it's not Neca slop. If it is, then it can fall apart in your hands and you'll still give it a good score.
>>
>>11660136
You're a fucking moron
>>
>this sucks
>that sucks
>it's really bad
>don't buy it
>what is Hasbro thinking
>they are shit
>too expensive
>8.5/10
He's the only reviewer who mentions some flaws but I did not buy a single figure I've watched him make a review about even if he gives them a high score.
>>
He really likes threezero
>>
When he's gonna do the fan display showcase stream? Want to share my shit with the world.
>>
>does this figure have smart modern articulation and no disproportionate limitations
that's basically his main criteria. he'll nitpick about sculpt and paint, but if the articulation is reasonable and the figure isn't the laziest thing ever aesthetically he'll usually give it the "iyeah go ahead and buy it if you like the character"
>>
>>11660424
He refuses to do number ratings logically. He should just give figures letter grades between A and F since that is what his rating scale is based off.
>>
>>11660549
He actually prefers aesthetic far over articulation
>>
>>11660553
as a high level trade off sure but when he's dogging a figure for basic mistakes it's usually incompetent articulation, characters with badly set legs, terrible range in the torso, lollipop necks, etc.
>>
>>11660549
He doesn't care about limitations if he likes the sculpt/the company.
Also this is the same guy who used to be (is still?) against toe hinges and butterflies because "they don't add anything and only look ugly".
His articulated figure line that he was going to wow the entire world with is also dead in the water.
>>
>>11658410
You think he wiki'd that passage?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.