old >>11654377
Posting these guys again. As individual bots go, XTB's constructicons are looking good. MS's Combaticons will probs never be combined, the individual bots are just that good imo.
>>11669427I think it's too small for that
>>11675231are they better than the XTB Constructicons?
>>11675271Anything is better than XTB
>>11675198Why put Computron there?He came out a while ago
So uh, are there any Matrixi that would fit in his hands like the movie?
Something like this? I would settle for a 3 finger hold on each side.
>>116756373D print one
>>11675642What 3D printer do you recommend for someone with a tight budget?
>>11675661Can't you use someone elses?I'm sure someone will do make one for a small fee
Mini Bruty! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4bxDlDDu_U
>>11675271???? Those are XTBs Constructicons. The youth (toy) varient specifically
Any good doctor who ones
Is NA going to make an even larger combiner frame that combines these 6 combiners?
Is an officially licensed model kit technically appropriate for this thread? I feel like it would be better suited here given the nature of “transformers that don’t transform” discourse.Anyways, love my Primes and have many that transform, but none of them articulate like this guy. So, I wanted to give it a try. Probably won’t buy any other Flame Toys stuff but I like having a very very bendy Prime.
Bought the little bastard. Can't wait.
>>11677050This the furai model?Yeah they fit here since they are technically licensed 3rd party, like the actual use of the term "3rd Party".It also fits in /tfg/ anyway since they have no hard rule against 3rd parties, just that you might trigger some autists which is good for a laugh or two.
>>11676585I thought the toy decoes had a different head to the toon version?
>>11677378They do, but they also come with a g1 stock head themed to their respective bot.
Yeay? Nay?
>>11677449Absolutely, a friend has him and he looks and feels fantastic
>>11677449he reminds me of that old drawing ban! did of megatron
>>11677457>he looks and feels fantasticThe toy or your friend?
>>11677449Care to drop the name?
>>11677054looks cool. if they were gonna do a fun repaint, these would look cool
>>11677538That new Daftbots line that's coming out has a similar aesthetic, tiny cartoony army vehicles with tiny cartoony crews. And they turn into robots.
>>11677665
Have to skip reviews like these now because i can't stand the POM-on-POM squeaky joint noisehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNg-_XqdHUA
>>11677834>POM-on-POMwtf is that?Why not just mute it and turn on CC
>>11677851>POMA type of strong plastic used for gears or joints on toys.
>>11677834If Cang Toys continued this arthropod line they'd get a purchase each time from me which is an infinite roi over the long run if you think about it so they should make more.
>>11677894They'll be doing Constructicons and Dinobots before they return to it
>>11677895Boooo!!! They better return with a group of BBBs (breedable bug babes)
>>11677900Unf, check out the ass on that hottie.
>>11677665>>11677672tank mode is nice but wtf is up with that face
>>11677915Looks like a coalfire powered engine
>>11677915It's a coal furnace face with two gauges for eyes.
>>11677915The next one is even more handsome
>>11677963The trailer can be worn as a hat + backpack
>>11677966“Ugliness” aside, they looks like perfect desk toys and have unique transformation schemes.
>>11677672What's the price point on these?
>>11677054They're also making BW Megatron. So cute. I wonder what it will cost.
>>11678065And it's unclear if the eyes will light up or not. I believe the latest images don't show the light up feature.
>>11677449I have it. His toes don’t hold very well. His legs are kinda weird stability wise. Other than that, it’s a cool figure
I'm not impressed with Sovereign 2.0. After a month with him, I can't recommend him.
>>11678418Really?Looks pretty good to me, what’s wrong with him
>>11677665>>11677672Cute tankHorrendous designed Robot
>>11678418lmao i said the same thing about the 1.0. I think I'm just not fond of the Galvatron design in general.
>>11678418he looks long, like weirdly long. are his feet at least stable? my 1.0 movie ver had loose toes and would fall on his face a lot
>>11678525The thighs look like they are very long.
Anyone know if Legacy Starscream actually has ports for this? Or is it just the wrist?
>>11678622It has a peg in the Swindle so he basically uses it like a gun lol
>>11678528The thighs look proportionateAm I taking crazy pills?This is a weird line of complaints
>>11678622>paying $23.80 for 3D shit>When you can print infinite Swindles yourself for $9.30
>>11678622This design has a 5mm hole on the bottom, I think the seller includes a 5 mm peg so you can attach it to any 5mm hole on Starscream.
>>11678812You can attach the old original Swindle toy to Legacy Starscream the same way, with a 5mm tube. I managed to find the repaint of it 2nd-hand.
>>11678822Whoa, how do you detach the ring like that?
>>11678825You mean the wing? Just pop them off. That red hinge is made of wear-resistant nylon it can be done without damage. I store the wing on the other side, also using a 5mm tube, you can see it in the same photo.
>>11678838Hell yeah, I should do that. I always liked the wing blade more than the Starsaber.
>>11678065Probably around $50 like their Optimus.
Magic Square makes the best MP scale combiners, agree or disagree? if you think otherwise. whats your preference. I'm trying get a idea of what horse to back.
Scored this bad boy recently, didn't come with no guns tho.
>>11679765Is that Baiwei?
>>11679855Oh yeah I forgot to mention the brand, it's YouHu.
Why are the limb bots robot forms for MMCs Ocular Max combiners so oddly proportioned? are they maximising the combined modes presentation at the cost of the limbs?
>>11680196The All-in-one gimmick requires sacrifices to the engineering gods. They are trying to adhere close to very clean Sunbow silhouettes that have inherently goofy proportions while making the combiner and alt mode to work without extra pieces. MMC also prioritizes keeping the transformation relatively intuitive and making sure there is still a load of playability as toys. I think they could be slightly better in some areas but they aren't going to be able to looksmax as easily as something that can partsform all the hard bits out of the way.
Has anyone got mpu sunstorm yet?I've got payment request for acid storm but I honestly dunno if I want it now
>>11679721I just got the set and hes incredible. There are issues like some mold flashing and he doesn't come with his iconic gun which is unfortunate. There's also a problem with Vortex clipping properly onto Bruticus but there's solutions for it.The toon chest/feet add ons are also 100 plus which is hefty.The individual bots themselves are incredible and they're a joy to transform. Im debating keeping them individually but I've transformed all of them with no issues whatsoever all weekend.I'd highly recommend them maybe I just got lucky as tons of people are having tolerance issues.
>ko of an hour official figure and add on kitI don't knowI understand where the maker is coming from but you can't use the new add on properly with the original figure is a bummer- even if the new figure is more "accurate".Though I do have to say there is something to be desired with the design (I mean the visual look) in the super mode so I guessing I am keeping this in fire truck. I am still thinking an official truck mode is actually coming. And it is probably very similar in the overall engineering design compared to the DNA kit. Though considering that we still have not got animated Megatron or even lugnut I think we will be wait for a while
