Killer Robots Editionprevious: >>200607375
what version of this am I supposed to watch
>>200643026Integral Cut, it should be around 116 minutes long
>>200642961>picWhat is that? A floor sweeper that went rogue? What's it going to do, brush her to death?
>>200643090You're talking about a state of the art mall security system. Tasers, lasers, tranquilizers and more!
>>200643150Gotta admit that looks pretty cool
do you think this is going to be Pearl good, or X bad
>>200643595
alright gonna watch Evil Dead Trap
Would /hor/ watch this?
>>200643805well I watched Rob Zombies version of that so sure
>>200643595X good. Apparently it's a gialloish thriller. I expect it to be kinda like DePalma's best 80s thrillers. The studio seems very confident in it
In a Violent Nature is retarded, the kills look like shit and the killer's design is awful.
VOTE FOR THE 5 BEST / WORST SLASHERS SINCE 2017!BEST - https://strawpoll.com/6QnMQmX2lne/WORST - https://strawpoll.com/poy9kQ2aJgJ/
>>200644737>In a Violent Nature is retarded, the kills look like shit and the kille-
>wake up>almost 4am>88F outsideHow the fuck is this allowed?
>>200644898The Sun is a deadly laser
>>200644898footage of you awaking
>>200644917it is if you're a vampire
>>200644917It's definitely out to kill people.>>200644931Winter better be some brutal shit with how bad summer is.>>200645017I'm pale enough to be a vampire. The sun is my enemy. Always has been.
Never seen Poltergeist, time to watch it
>>200645081I saw that as a kid but haven't since, so interested on your thoughts
VOTE PLEASE!> 2 BEST?https://strawpoll.com/w4nWWDMpWnA/> 2 MOST UNDERRATED?https://strawpoll.com/QrgewVkKLyp/> 2 WORST?https://strawpoll.com/1Mnwkv9XLn7/
>>200644783>>200644783>>200644783HOW THE FUCK IS SCREAM 6 WORSE THAN BLACK CHRISTMAS 2019 OR THE SLUMBER PARTY MASSACRE REBOOT?
>>200645212The problem with polls is that people haven't seen many movies and either pick what they have or just what was mainstream. Scream 6 was bad mostly because of the ending. Black Christmas re-remake was just feminist trash and SPM remake was at least not as shit. The only thing good about Black Christmas re-remake was Cary Elwes.
>>200645081Never seen it either, just know shit about it from it being parodied on South Park & Family Guy.
>>200643595Saw it. Found it to be the best of the trilogy, it feels bigger and more well-rounded than the first two.It's a love letter to 80s slashers and giallo, with all its oddities and strange narrative decisions. I might rub people the wrong way if not seen in this context.
>>200645872Neat, good to know. I imagine he probably got more of a budget as they became popular.
>>200645872Any nude scenes? If so, which actresses
>>200645985kek this is the one spoiler I'm interested in as well. between X and Infinity Pool, Mia Goth is pretty much all the nudity we've been getting.
>>200645985I think maybe I saw Mia's sideboob for a split second. Plus some other girls are seen naked, but it's really not the focus of the movie. They even tease you with Mia having to take her shirt off in the beginning and then cutting away.
>>200646060Thx. I'll watch it
We need less nudity and sex and more ryona.
>>200646335Why not both
>>200643851Gotta love el superbeasto
finished Evil Dead Trapidk why but I thought this was a comedy horror. definitely not. couldn't be more humourless in fact, but it was however a cool (if confusing) japanese slasher. too long though, would have been much better with a little editing.
>>200646400Sex scenes only exist to make women watch your film and fill the coffers of whores. Both things that degrade the integrity of film.
>>200646786>Sex scenes only exist to make women watch your filmTbqh with you that's an Amerucan millennial incel/shut-in cope. Irl men seek these scenes bc most of us enjoy them, much more than women do bc their own path to arousal is different, they're not as visual. Horror for instance is almost alway about female nudity, and rightly so since this fear-desire is essential to the the genre
>>200646908Stop being a woman.
>>200646786you're conflating sex scenes with topless and nude scenes.
>>200642961>watch sydney sweeney horror movie>she immediately lusts after a black guyWhat the fuck. It's all so tiresome.
>>200646946They're the same thing. You're pausing the film to show off some chick's rack.It's pointless and the fact that people still applaud themselves and call themselves edgy for it is baffling.
>>200644787too bad it was ruined by going on for a comedic amount of time. one of the few instances where the audience was laughing when i saw it.
wife
>>200646983They're clearly not the same thing retard. If you poll women on what content they want in a horror film they're not going to say "I want the chick with the big rack to get her tits out"
>>200646598it gets really fuckin bonkers at the end too. i watched the first sequel but not the 3rd. it’s a lot different but wasn’t terrible from what i recall.
>>200646926It's the truth. You have to actually know women and understand their preferences to realize that and realize other obvious facts: men masturbate more, seek and create pornography in several media more often etc.There's a thread going on about Kinds of Kindness with anons saying sex scenes are for-Europeans-brown ppl-indians-women-chineseWhat they don't seem to get is that this means most of the world's population except for incels and/or ppl with extreme religious upbringing.Again, horror has practically never fetshized men's bodies bc we prefer to see women naked
>>200647013They'll say sensuality and sex which is topless scenes and some random bitch getting banged.
>>200647039>men masturbate more, seek and create pornography in several media more often etcYou obviously know very very little about women if you believe this.
>>200644787Funny scene, one of the movie's best moments. Overall it's long-range and a bit repetitive but worth watching
>>200647039i agree but there is a difference between a simple AWOOGA scene of a womans bare breasts and a 5 minute sex scene like in the roomone is just to get dumb men horny and interested in paying for movie tickets and the other is for guys without dial up to jerk off to
Sex scenes are put in movies because women don't understand plot or characterization so you have to jangle sex in front if them like keys in front of a stupid dog.They bitch like crazy if movies or TV don't have a sex scene every episode. It's fucking up everything.
>>200647063Science establishes this bc of semen buildup. Women can go without masturbating for longer and they sometimes have issues such as vaginismus and lower libido whereas in men testosterone usually means a higher sex drive. All movie genres where sex/nudity is more frequent are historically linked to male audiences and women watching porn is in fact a recent phenomenon. When Jean Rollin, Roger Corman or Sergio Martino put sex scenes in their movies they were catering to a male demographic.
>>20064704490% of nudity in horror films is just a hot woman getting naked for some contrived reason before getting murdered. This is clearly for the male audience, it's not like women were going to see nudie-cutie films like Orgy of the Dead.Sex scenes (where a man and a woman roll around like retards) I agree are more aimed at women, but are also more rare.
>>200647130this, my mom didn't understand lethal weapon until riggs and murtaugh buttfucked each other and now its her favourite movie!
>>200647086Yes, nudity doesn't always leads to sex in movies or in real life. Nude scenes are there for several reasons, mostly but not solely titillation/ arousal. There's an aesthetic appeal to them
>>200647130>It's fucking up everything.What kind of zoomer take is this. On the great list of issues fucking up film and television, "too much sex" is way, way fucking down the list.
>>200643723>1st one is great, amazing story and setting and the ending>2nd one retarded incoherent mess not a direct sequel>3rd one not a direct sequelhow do you fuck this up so goddamn badly, the guy had literal fucking GOLD and turned it into shit
>>200646786Zoomers were a mistake.
>>200647385He's right though, sex scenes are retarded. Nudity (of attractive women) is based though
>>200647410Sex scenes are integral part of some movies like Love Witch or Videodrome.
>>200647508And it's literally the main theme in several other movies such as X, Rabid, It Follows etc
>>200647582>X
>>200647582>XWhy do Americans worship blacks?
>>200647582X is literally an interracial porno made by the tribe. It's not a film.Maxine is the same thing.
>>200647598Here we go again. Let me guess: you hated the interracial sex scene etc. Ok. But the movie's still overwhelming about sex bc [spoilers]old Pearl was a nymphomaniac.[/spoilers] You did get that right? Btw the cuckolding was also in line with the same theme of sex as a nonmoral drive
>>200647598Fuck off, negro piss man 2. If somebody mentions a bad movie, you don't have to seethe about it for a next hour.Porn is literally the theme of X though.
>>200647650This, I'm sick of seeing that shit in /hor/. I want to discuss horror films, not a Jewish porno
>>200642961Has there been, or could there be if one doesn't exist, a modern Jiangshi film?The films I know are all 80's Hong Kong or Taiwan cinema and are all comedic.Is there a way that this concept could be made scary? Or is the idea of a >chinese hopping vampireinherently ridiculous and thus could never be scary?
>>200647656Yeah it's a pointless porno for stupid women glad we agree.
>>200647625Do they? I understand some see that scene as a provocation by Ti West, but contextually it's a cautionary lesson: don't take your gf to sexually boundless settings such as a porn shoot bc otherwise you risk getting that type of outcome.
>>200647598>>200647625>>200647650>>200647690Stop samefagging. And if you don't want to discuss about X, don't start the spam every fucking time somebody mentions it.
>>200647694they basically did make that, Rigor Mortis (2013). I actually found one scene quite creepy.it's a totally different tone, bleak. if you've see any Mr. Vampire films, it is cool to see the same actors reprising their roles. If a little odd, because it's so dark.
>>200647650>>200647690Good thing neither of you have to watch or discuss it. That is a type of rationale that probably limits the amount of horror and movies in general that you watch
>>200647722>I want to prove porn is le bad>How will I prove this?>I'll make an interracial porno movie!Ti West is unironically retarded >>200647738Go to bed, Mr. West, your movie sucks
>>200647762The wrong side won.
>>200647712We don't: I enjoy sex as a subject/trope in movies bc it's an inherently interesting part of life. I'll unironically go watch MaXXXine at the theater
You see what happens when women get in charge?
>>200647798>I'll go watch interracial porn in a theaterGood for you lmao
>>200647798Take a selfie in front of the screen with your ridin Biden pin for internet good boy points.
>>200647776You misunderstood it. X is not about porn is le bad-- in fact Ti said he wanted to highlight how porn and horror have similarities both as products and how they're produced- small crews, amateur(ish) casts, improvised locations etc.X, just like Eyes Wide Shut, actually shows that the sex is a very compelling drive that sometimes overrides social norms
>>200647722And it just had to be a black guy, right? With a ridiculous prosthetic too. If the MUH DIK meme were real, why use a prosthetic? Disgusting shit.
Guys, you need to cool it with the antisemitic remarks. X and MaXXXine are good movies, stop being racist.
>>200647853>only leftists enjoy sexI have been on 4chan since 2005, and this one is the most retarded post I have ever read.
>>200647853It's foolish to assume movies such as MaXXXine are made for Biden types, particularly weird sexless feminists, trannies etc. But they're not made for ultraprudish types either
>>200647899Interesting you read it that way. You really are a little dweeb.
>>200647881MaXXXine hasn't come out yet... Pearl was good, markedly better than X. I'll give it a chance because of that.
>>200647870Why exactly did he feel the need to cast a black guy as the dude who fucks all the women, and cast the white guy as the pathetic loser? Did the film really need multiple interracial sex scenes?
>>200647899*only leftists enjoy interracial sex movies
>>200647925It's edgy bro. Titties and dicks push the envelope. It advances the medium and pays tribute to all the Floyds we've lost on the battlefield.
>>200647925His new movie does the exact same thing. Of course the new male porn star is a black guy again. It's obviously his sick fetish.
I have to applaud Ti West on how he managed to make a single scene which makes both meme left and meme right seethe.>meme right: noooo you can't show a black guy pretending to fuck my imaginary latina waifu in a movie nooooo>meme left: noooo you can't show a black guy fucking a white guy's girlfriend and take the white guy's side in the movie, she isn't owned by the white guy noooo
>>200647877That was provocative even if black porn actors weren't that rare in the 70s. What compounds it is the fact that the bf was white and Jenna, despite being latina, had up to then a "pure" rl public persona. In fact I assume the "Sunday" panties was a pun related to her Wednesday character. But this type of trick shouldn't faze you since irl women of all races are statisticallly proven to overwhelmingly prefer white men.
>>200648014>Implying you have to be "le meme left le meme right" to not enjoy interracial pornWhat did he mean by this?
>>200647656>[spoilers]
If I could erase one debate from the general it'd be this one
>>200648019It's not about fazing me it's about making movies worse through inserting political diversity shit and sick cuckold fetishes. That's not even horror at that point. It's just pathetic nonsense.
>>200648050Vampires?
>>200648014>a single sceneYou mean multiple scenes in X and more coming in MaXXXine because of course the new porn guy is also a MUH DIK black?
>>200648070the eternal X arguments. gross scenes, don't want to think about it for another second.
>>200648046It's 2 year old movie by now, that's been discussed here on almost every single /hor/ thread since the release. I don't think anybody needs to spoiler tag it anymore.
>>200648089I don't think Gustavo Fring will be doing any sec scenes.
>>200642961>>>/v/681138715
>>200648121Moses Sumney
>>200647925>>200648003Could be an attempt to rustle feathers (just as Spielberg invented a Christian gf to mock her in The Fabelmans) or it could be Ti's fetish or an attempt to include shitty ESG nonsense or some or all of those reasons.He's not a jew btw
>>200648150You seem to know lot about a movie franchise that you seem to hate. You are going to watch MaXXXine. We both know it.
This seems like something Necrostorm would do. Gonna watch it.
The Innkeepers is Ti West's best movie and one of the best horror movies of the last decade, and I'm tired of pretending that it's not.
>>200648100Sure, but I was just pointing out the retard didn't know how to use the spoiler tagX is overdiscussed for political reasons, it's mediocre as horror
>>200648166It's called movie credits, retard. Leave it to a leftist to imply that it's better to NOT be informed when engaging in a debate. Too much knowledge is dangerous, huh? You might catch subversive chud thoughts if you look into the truth. Fucking idiot.
>>200648203>The Innkeepers is Ti West's best movieProbably, that or The House of the Devil. But it doesn't mean much considering he proved himself a MAJOR hack in the following decade.
>>200648014The scene right after when the cameraman talks to the producer definitely is very redpilled when the latter curtly tells the camera guy that there's no such thing as "nice girls". It goes right to the point and foreshadows Pearl's rampage>>200648059But you do realize that not necessarily you but some other anons ALWAYS seethe when X is mentioned, right? And it's always bc of that scene whose contextual meaning eludes them since that was a heads-up to men."Diversity"for its own sake does suck but I don't think Kid Cudi was miscast in that particular role
>>200648220Thank you for your autistic lesson
>>200647753Wow I'd never heard of this. Sounds like a great tribute.
>>200648298You're welcome, don't embarrass yourself again.
>>200648327Since I'm not a socially awkward weirdo I didn't even register it
>>200648280But they're still ultimately right about the context and it's disingenuous to try assigning alternative red herring reasons for it. We all know what it's about.
>>200648243You seem to get oddly emotional over this.
>>200648359Sure, you didn't care at all.
[spoilers/]TEST[spoilers/]
>>200648362It's not something that should make ppl seethe so much for so long. Let's assume it was meant to rile some white men: the only proper way to have the upper hand is shrug it off instead of letting the shoe fit. It's a movie. It's not your gf: you should see the cameraman's case as a circumstance to avoid. And finally, see how it connects to the movie narratively and thematically
>>200648203>The Innkeepers (2011)>of the last decadeanon... I agree on both counts though, really good film.
>>200648449Letting the shoe fit? Like you said, it's a movie. So why are you implying that anyone who thinks the movie is shit because of retarded political nonsense like that is letting the shoe fit? It's calling a spade a spade. X is a shit movie and Ti West is a retarded cuck. What's the problem?
>>200648406the / needs to be at the start of the second tag, like this: [/spoilers]
>>200648506and ONLY the second tag. or just hit ctrl+s if you're not a phonefag.
>>200648504Not him, but the problem is hours longing sperging out when someone casually mentions the movie.
>>200648542>movie gets mentioned>movie gets discussedOkay?
turn around while this webm plays please
>/hor/ intellectuals
What do you think about this bros? It has /ourgirl/ in it
>>200648566Only chuds know how to use spoilers anyways, so whatever
>>200648187the trailer is oddly captivatinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_LDcKwbT2w
>>200648556>discussedNothing wrong with that. Emotionally repeating same sentences through 2 years is not quality discussion.
>>200648583>/ourgirl/See >>200646977
>>200648583It's fucking awful>>200648560Henry is so kino, the sequel is very underrated too
>>200648583It was ok. Not particularly good or bad, but watchable at least once. I think Sydney Sweeney is sexy as fuck, so it helped me to enjoy the movie.
>>200648504>So why are you implying that anyone who thinks the movie is shit because of retarded political nonsense like that is letting the shoe fit?Because it's an overreaction. It's the equivalent of falling for troll posts/comments. And it can it make it harder for you to assess the movie objectively and, even if don't like it overall, stop you from enjoying some of its other aspects
>>200648596It certainly isn't, but for a sizeable part of the community this disgusted reaction towards the film is the main takeaway so when it's mentioned they'll sperg accordingly. It's an effective movie since it offended people so much. It's also definitely a political one in our age.
Well, this was a fine week with three big horror(esque) VOD releases and having now watched two of them- The Devil's Bath, below mediocre and largely dull, Franz-Fiala's weakest; In A Violent Nature, pretty interesting and enjoyable visually and thematically if self-aware to a fault- it's time to check the third one, and certainly the sloppiest, The Watchers.
>>200648969>Shyamalan
>>200648969I've just read elsewhere a take that I find totally unwarranted about In a Violent Nature and yet it's also an interesting one to consider:>I wasnt a big fan of the killer essentially being imaginary (The killer being the analogy for a man eating bear in the areas).
>>200649054the twist is it's not by M Night, it's by his daughter
>>200649177Mind blown. Also, would. Maybe. I'd think about it.
>>200649078well bears don't use log splitters. but they do hibernate underground. the parallels are there, also right in the title of the film I guess.
>>200649297Do bears rape?
>>200649321Does a bear rape in the woods? Is a the pope a rapist?
>>200649321Fuck the bears
>>200649297Yes, it's vague enough to go either in that direction (but that would mean a very unreliable narrative in several aspects since many scenes have only the viewers as witnesses, including the very last one) or it could mean that the brother was actually attacked by the killer
>>200644931based Hong Kong vampire movie webm poster
>The man has worms coming out of him and you're laughing. You're laughing.
>>200650300I actually liked this a lot before all the goofy shit happened. Apparently subtlety and atmosphere need to go out the window in the last 20 minutes of all these types of movies.
>>200650300Kino. Best part of the movie, which I liked overall.
>>200650688>>200651640which opinion should I have, /hor/
>>200651924Your own. I liked the movie, but I'm a conspiracy Chad.
>>200652009I liked the movieidk how I feel about the scene, it was a cool scene but it did feel a bit out of placedefinitely very memorable so overall i liked it
Anyone else get older and start liking non-sugar things? Like for cereal, I now like plain Rice Chex over the typical sugar loaded kid ones.
>>200648560>serial killer movie>incestuous plotevery fucking time
>>200648406>>200648506>>200648530>>200648585lmao lrn2 4chan
Got my little cousin a library card and a Kanopy account.The horror selection is pretty decent.https://www.kanopy.com/en/category/29299
>>200652748>ParaNormanThey made the sister's ass big on purpose.Some free streaming services have good horror selections too. Others have a ton of low budget shit that nobody should watch.
>>200643595>X badhow to spot a chud person
>>200652485>the fat man's horror
>>200653299Surprised there's not more fat horror since every other ridiculous idea has been done.
>>200646994>too bad it was ruined by going on for a comedic amount of time.wrong, the movie failed because it didn't commit to the mesmerizing (pocket watch) immersion of truly long takes - idc about filtered plebs and zoomers. I'd say it desperately needs a director's cut after being butchered in editing for commercialization but I'm not sure how true that is. I knew it'd be an issue when they jump cut ahead his walking to the 1st house but then even in the kill sequences which should be unsettlingly realistic and suffocating in the held shot (gunshot+hatchet throw) he cuts all over the place like it's a typical action money shot (yoga). They surely had to for the gore effects, but at what cost? Director cites 'Angst' and 'Elephant' as inspo which both exemplify this technique when done right.they only really commit on the logsplitter and even that got butchered>"That was one of the last things we shot in the film. And we were all set up, and it was like an overnight shoot, and we were just running out of time. So we had to make an executive decision, because everything was kind of in a one-take, like, the whole body was rigged. So we had one shot at everything. We had to make an executive decision to be like, 'OK, well, what's the minimal amount of limbs that we can get away with without kneecapping the gag so much?'" props to sticking with Unrated, lack of music ambience design and the actor really nailing the menace in his pacing
>>200653340They've reached the peak with Taxidermia, it's all downhill from here.
>>200648187>>200648592It's an interesting film to watch to say the least. Could have been better, but not bad at all. I'd recommend it. Just be prepared for some heavy Malick-type musing.
>look for the new /hor/ gen so I can post my Twilight Zone robotfu>see thread themeKINOOOOO
>>200652748>that selectionBrb digging up my 20 something year old library card
Going to start off next month with The Watchers and In A Violent Nature. Maybe a third movie if I can fit it in.
I LOVED Hell House LLC. I don’t usually like the found footage type movies but for some reason that one just hit right. The creepy stuff in the background was intense for me. And I have since dubbed that sort of stuff as “background ickies”
>>200647508Difference is, Videodrome and Love Witch are actually good while X and It Follows sucked >>200647582
>>200655224WHY did it need to be found footagethat movie would have been so much better if it was shot normally
>>200655224The series is great>>200655312Imagine not being a FF Chad
Finished watching a Quiet Place part 1. Movie was good and enjoyable. No issue with the African female, the movie is set in NYC. However, they did have the male star play the role of a beta male.
Which VHS is the best one (with monsters/ghosts/aliens instead of just humans)?
I took the bait and renewed Shudder for the Late Night with the Devil, it was okay. What's good on here that isn't on every other service?>>200655224Yeah this was a good movie.
>>200655997VHS is a let down. The entire series is except for one segment which was the Indonesian cult one. The whole series is over hyped and over rated.
All the horror movies I've seen in June>Terror TrainComfy train atmosphere, the "most unpredictable plot twist in history"™ (heard someone say it about it) was pretty lame, I thought it would turn out that Jamie Lee Curtis had a dick.>Scream (whole series)1&4 = best, 5&6 were actual agony to watch. Proof that the "meta" of Scream is easily defeated by the new meta where being diverse protects you from death.>HiddenDid predict that "it's normal outside" twist. It was maybe 33% accurate. But other than the twist it was probably one of the most boring bunker movies that I can remember.>RetreatIdea worth a 20 minute mystery series skit expanded to a full movie. Predictable twist because I've seen this as a related movie to Hidden.>The MistI couldn't remember whether I've actually seen the movie on TV or not, but when I watched it there was absolutely nothing new that I didn't remember. Wish they made new movies with the "massive creatures from another world" concept, I don't think its potential has ever been properly tapped in horror movies.>Hellbound - Hellraiser IIIt's like a Disneyfied version of Hellraiser. I've seen clips from the movie years ago, the movie didn't help with the embarrassing deaths of Pinhead and his gash. Kirsty wearing Julia's skin was jumping the shark. I remember reading about the skin peeling scene decades ago, it sounded much scarier on paper than it looked on the screen.>Final Destination (whole series)More of a rewatch. The opening scenes are the only memorable part, the one by one kills are just too unrealistic to take seriously. 4th movie was the worst but its sex scene is what made me keep this waste of space on my HDD.>Night Train to Terror1st segment had lots of 80s titties, 2nd has just one pair, 3rd segment was the longest and the worst. Admirable effort to recycle a couple of cancelled movies. The song lyrics>Everybody's got something to do/Everybody but youspoke deeply to me.
>>200657389>Night TrainFound by accident when looking up Night Train to Terror. A made for TV movie that almost no one watched. I knew it would go to shit the moment Steve Zahn appeared. A surprising amount of near A-list celebrities considering it never had a theatrical release. The only memorable part was long neck Sobieski (pic related).
>I was good to you, Mikey>I was good to you...
>>200656767>The whole series is over hyped and over rated.uhh by who? seems to be a pretty well established consensus they are largely uneven suffering from the same drawbacks as all anthologies and short-form horror but are a fun celebration of the genre and punky amateur found footage and lord knows found footage fans slurp up far worse dreck. I know a lot of you faggots just hate found footage yet time and time again I'd see you pull up the new installment ready to hate it and then bitch and seethe about how it's so shit. it's not that serious lighten up
>>200657975>seems to be a pretty well established consensus tlExactly. The masses and online sites. Overrated and shitty. The whole series is a nothing burger and is on par with other no name anthologies.
essential summer/daytime horror movies?
>>200657473Poor Leeloo
>>200658307All the camp stories
>>200657809maybe I'm a pussy but this scene made me cry
>>200658940You cried during your first period.
>>200642961>Spider robots injecting you with needles filled with acid. Freaked me out as a kid.
Explain why people like Oz Perkins.Gretel & Hansel was fucking awful. I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House is the most boring piece of soi horror imaginable. Longlegs looks like it's gonna be boring as hell.I haven't seen Blackcoat's Daughter but judging by previous experiences with him, I don't think it's as great as people say it is.
You will watch day of the dead 1985
>>200659713people like Oz Perkins because Longlegs is goodsimple as that
>>200660143I will not do such a thing again.
>>200659713He's like A24 but good.
>>200653486sauce of the movie?wanna see it with a friend, we're out of good horror movies
>>200661155Nta but Society (1989)
>>200661257It's not Society
>>200646977That's the compromise the jews came up with having attractive White women in movies now; they're gonna get ORCED.
>>200646977Never heard of this. Is it good? Normally amazon stuff is awful imo, like suspiria remake.
>>200653602Is there not a higher quality rip out?
a south korean remake of Tucker & Dale vs Evil came out recentlyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drKYkxmuEiU
>>200659713>Blackcoat's DaughterOnly seen this one. It was good.
>>200660538>LonglegsThis actually looks pretty shitty. The main actress does not exactly inspire hope.
>>200661433That is why you don't watch those movies? >>200654499It's saddening to see girls age lol
>>200654730The contemporary horror section is soi >>200655049>The WatchersModern and soi. Probably some girlboss trash. I too will put it on tonight to see.
>>200661563Negative
>>200659713>>200661681The only people that have seen Blackcoat’s Daughter are the Bonyton poster and a few others that were tricked.Speaking off, wya Nellposter?
>>200661679Lee Sung-Min was good in The Beast, so that's a huge plus. Also had a role in Hunt, which is a great movie.
>>200661827>It's saddening to see girls age lolThe fuck does that have to do with my post?
>>200657975VHS is shit.i have seen everyone movie. I think last last one was so bad that it became ridiculous. Even the first movie was bad. The whole series is hyped up by online horror movie sites.
>>200661956Blackcoats daughter was shit.
>>200642961
I saw A Quiet Place: Day One. It was pretty good except the coastal elites put in subliminal messages to get people in the heartland to use fentanyl because they want to kill us and take our property, apart from that I liked it.
>>200644575>Not instanlty shooting these fuckers
>>200662137How do the creatures even take shit over? If they avoid loud sounds, wouldn't a thunderstorm or hurricane immediately kill them? Are those creatures immune to fucking bullets, rockets, fire, etc.?
>>200662232>If they avoid loud soundsThey don't>Are those creatures immune to fucking bullets, rockets, fire, etc.?Bullets and fire it seems like they're immune, rockets I don't know but they'd be damn hard to hit.
How would X-Com fare against the Quiet Place monsters
>>200658878
>>200662298>They don'tThen why in the first one did they not go near waterfalls?
>>200662004You uploaded a pic and I responded. Lol. Don't show aged starlets if you don't like it.
>>200662354Imagine reaching this level of BASED
>>200662361Cause they don't go to sounds that waterfalls make.
>>200662448>25 is agedBesides, your whining post could’ve applied to almost every woman over 18.
>>200660655
>>200662354Where DID he come from though?
>>20066255625? Holy shit. She looks 60-70. I thought you uploaded that pic to show one of those golden era actress to show off her acting experience.
>>200662492Seems like a plot hole to me. They were defeated in the first with high pitch sounds and shooting them in the mouth, which the US government would have used. They used it on their own citizens before. Apocalyptic movies really underestimate government intervention and measures.
>>200662361Because constant noise means they can't hear prey.
>>200662660>They used it on their own citizens beforeThis guy thinks the government is shooting high pitched sounds into his mouth.
>>200661956>NellposterHe killed himself after finding out she burns coal.
>>200662660They avoid sounds that are constant. >>200662660>underestimate government intervention and measures.Not underestimated. Less effective and efficient that it should be. What is the government but a bunch of working class people? Stop thinking like that lol.
>>200662602he looks canadian
>>200662636Blind AND retarded, nice.
will we ever get Prom Night II in HD?
the anon that said "in a violent nature" just cut away from every kill was rightwhat a fucking shit movie I almost want to stop watching already
>>200662711No, the US government has used sound as a weapon on crowds before to get them to disperse. Shit works.>>200662815>>200662671Then everybody would have just pumped out static noise and easily got the creatures to isolate themselves while they figure how to beat them. Prolonged heavy rain would have also worked immediately.>>200662815>government>working class peopleThey aren't. They are a well-connected & wealthy group of sociopaths/psychopaths that would murder 5 million innocent people if it means they get more power, control, money, and influence.
>>200662970Still want to see it, as people say it's completely different to the original.
has any horror comedy come close to braindead/dead alive??
>>200655312Found footage is a trash genre but I cant imagine Hell House LLC playing out any other way. Given the setup I think the best way is to introduce the audience with a mockumentary and then transition into found footage for the rest of the movie.
>>200657389>>Scream (whole series)>1&4 = best, 5&6 were actual agony to watch. Proof that the "meta" of Scream is easily defeated by the new meta where being diverse protects you from death.Scream has become what it mocked. Sad!
>>200663179>Found footage is a trash genreMust suck not being a FF Chad. Just embrace it anon, your life will instantly be better.
>>200663175Frank Henenlotter Kinos are close if not basically in the same vein.
>>200655312t. retard
>>200663222It's something that in 2011 you could still mock gays like that and people found it funny. Even better since it was written by a gay guy. Now you do it, and they instantly review bomb your movie for being far-right nazi homophobic maga whatever.
>>200655997the overall fan favorite is definitely the cult temple (sanctuary?) but the fake (real) haunted house is my favorite
>>200663222>>200663309nigga that line is mocking chuds, it would still be included today the slurs would probably get cut though
>>200663368>nigga that line is mocking chudsIt predicted the future, the line is no mockery, it was a prophecy.
>>200663140>Then everybody would have just pumped out static noise and easily got the creatures to isolate themselves while they figure how to beat them. Prolonged heavy rain would have also worked immediately.Yeah it would have. What's your point?
>>200663175You mean splatter wise or slapstick wise?
>>200663580That the movie has huge plot holes that bring into the question of how they even took over.
>>200663222I don't remember the N-word
RottenTomatoes critics score doesn't work for horrors unless it has like 70+ reviews, sometimes even more. With other genres when the movie has 20 reviews for example or even 10 and the score is relatively high (i mean both % and the avg rating) i can safely torrent the movie and there's a good chance i will like it. But with horrors? It absolutely doesn't work unless you have a bigger, broader sample of reviewers. Complete lottery. It can be kino, it can be student level crap, tomatoes tells you nothing. I think i blame "genre enthusiasts" who are so enthusiastic they will throw away any standards for the movie they are watching and will just like whateverit's when normal movie critics decide to review the movie, only then the score matters
>>200663140Not really. They are nobodies. And as I get older, I realize how "money job and status" is just cope for betamales. Like no good looking guy that is alpha copes with that shit. I also learned nothing matters cause 90% of billionaires, workers, owners, etc etc are beta. Like look at the royal family, those guys are beta. I think if you make it to the top 10% of men, you are fine. Average men need muh status while getting mogged by 20 year old alpha men with no job.
>>200663630It's not a plot hole.
>>200663716It clearly is as it doesn't make sense how they took over.>>200663671>beta>alphaGet off the internet and detox. You really think the House Of Saud are a bunch of nobodies that don't run anything? You're either trolling or an actual retard. Which is it?
>>200663119>muh killsI hope you did, you're already filtered beyond belief
>>200664004if you watch horror for anything but creative kills youre a literal trog
>>200663803>House Of SaudI don't care lol. Elon Musk is the worlds richest known man. He is beta. 90% of men are beta. "Muh money and status" doesn't change that. House of sod? Show me the people in it and I will point out the alphas and betas.
>>200663803>bunch of nobodies that don't run anything?If you are a beta, yes, you are still a nobody. Betas and alphas are real whether you want to be reminded of your status or not.
>>200663644I want RottenTomatoes-dependent fucks to die
>>200664145>>200664172You're retarded, got it. Filtered.
>>200664117If you watch horror only to watch kills you're literally braindead. Might as well be a liveleak/kaotic watcher
>>200663644No review sites matter, especially RT. Just watch movies with an open mind and decide for yourself.
>>200663803When you are a beta, everything you do is cope. You wanna know why Andrew Tate pissed off so many people even the rich and people with muh status? Cause he rubbed it in their face that "even if you drive a 1 out of 10 limited edition Bugatti, you will still be a dork." No rich man with lots of responsibilities wants to be reminded that he is still nothing but a loser dork.
>>200643085>>200643026What's the difference?>>200647776I've not watched it on release, but I remember hating it.
Why do generals always attract the most mentally ill people?
>>200664190You're just mad your status and money won't get rid of your beta status. Yeah it sucks for most men. Too bad. Most adult men would just wish to forget they are losers and hope their "work" and "profession" will help them be something, but no, still a nerd dork and /or geek.
>>200664335hey we dont have the sarah gadon guy
>>200664117how about atmosphere and actually being scared for once? for me, its religious themed horror that gets me and i'm not even religious nor ever was, something about demons and satan gets me. that includes witches (agents of satan). kills are fun, head explosions are fun, but they are just elements of the greater picture. its called Horror and not Killer.
>>200664335Cause 90% of men are poor and when money is brought up, they start to seethe. Or they are middle aged with a job and wishes their job gave them status but then someone like tate, who is also very very very rich comes by and says "no you are still a dork."
>Half way through a horror movie, but hating it>You might as well finish itGod damn, In A Violent Nature
>>200662970dunno, but I know the webdl is of higher quality than all the other dvdrips I tried
>>200664399That is mexican girl btw.
>>200662137>except the coastal elites put in subliminal messages to get people in the heartland to use fentanyl because they want to kill us and take our propertyThis is true. …No, really
>>200664335social media ruined the internet
>>200662746Remember that week or so he “claimed” every /hor/ gen for Nell? Even I found that a bit cringy
5/5>...4/5>Pearl3/5>...2/5>X1/5>...
>>200663803>clearly is as it doesn't make sense how they took over.It does make sense cause the military and citizens did not know. In the first movie,they played that sound on the speakers. Earth could have done it but the invasion happened fast and these aliens are near invincible. Certain parts of the world can do it but they need to set up the speakers which itself would make noise.
>>200663671Oh god, negro piss man has entered the thread.
>>200664500>5/5Psychos In Love. Watch it.
>>200664588I live it
In a Violent Nature might be boring, but can the premise work for an interesting film?
>>200664388He’s literally talking you, you brown braindead retard. Do us all a favor and go stand in front of an incoming train.
>>200664648I thought it was interesting. And the film's premise is unique to itself, there are a lot of killer-pov films, including literal pov.
>>200664416>but she looks White>but that means Whiteness is an arbitrary characteristic, ergo there is no White people>but if no White people exist, then that same rationale could be extended to other races e.g. black people or Jews. >maybe doling out privileges, or removing the rights freedoms and privileges of others, shouldn’t be based on separatist, segregationist thought along arbitrary racial lines. >nobody gets any rights. No Indians, nor Jews, no blacks, no bugs. Yes. Think before you speak. I will bend mine enemies weapons back upon them.
In A Violent Nature > Sting > Late Night With The Devil > Stopmotion > The Devil's Bath > Abigail > The First Omen > Immaculate > The Watchers > Imaginary > Tarot2024 so far
>>200664668He ain't talking about me. That's for sure. He is talking about most men, rich and poor, that's why everyone seething lol. Imagine being rich thinking you made it and you get reminded you're still a dork beta.
>>200664648it's good
I can't tell if he's saying that Tate is such a dorknuts himself despite being rich that it reminds other rich people that it doesn't prove anything and you can still be a major dorknuts. Because that's the correct takeaway
>>200664209>liveleak/kaotic watcherRude, I hate goreshit in movies unless it's really disturbing. I'm few clicks away from looking at pictures of malformed fetuses, decomposed grandpas, burn victims and Mexicans mutilated by other Mexcians. I find certain beauty in how disturbing it is.Movie gore does nothing for me. The House That Jack Built had a really cool and creepy idea with that house though. Would love to see more of that.
>>200664710From what I've seen, my ranking so far is:>Abigail>Exhuma>Chime>The Vampire Next Door>I Saw The TV Glow>Followers>Closet>Immaculate>Night Swim>Imaginary>KARAKASA
Will In A Violent Nature turn into a new Lake Mungo, Leaving D.C., Dashcam?
>>200664973Dashcam and Leaving DC are actually good. Lake Mungo is boring as all hell. Hopefully it turns out like the former two.
>>200664710>>200664966I haven't seen many so my rankings/ratings areLNWTD 7,5/10Abigail 6/10Under Paris 5,5/10In a Violent Nature 5/10First Omen 4,5/10Immaculate 4,5/10Tarot 3/10
>>200665228>LNWTDI've seen this, but my program uses 2023 for release date because of the festival release. If I had to rank it somewhere for 2024, it would be in running with Abigail for the lead so far.
>>200664187it works for me (except for horrors). What's your problem? Combining RT + some other criteria results in me liking 80-90% of the movies i pick.I have a great filter. Loosening criteria and picking whatever means i will drop most of the stuff because it's bad>>200664238you literally can't read
Movies I love come to me. They're drawn to me.
>>200665394Yes, it made the festival rounds in 2023. It was mentioned often in generals last year, I remember talking to an anon who had seen it months ago and spoke highly of it. He also claimed that some in production Nekrokosm (still tbr) scenes had already been shown to execs etc and caused a very good impression.
>>200653486>>200661155>>200661420Night Angelhttps://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100247/characters/nm0817046
>>200664710first omen is kino out of that list. The rest is unwatchable
>>200665637lmao
>>200665478That's why all you watch homosexual horror.
>>200665777It's a flawless system really
>>200664710>Sting>ImaginarySo woke.
>>200664809If that's what you think. He pretty made everyone seethe. He made the poor seethe by calling them brokies and he reminded the rich they are still dork nerd geeks. He also reminded females of their declining value.
>>200663580>>200663140That reminds me of some stupid fucking movie I saw about these blind albino flying cave lizards that mindlessly attack anything that makes sound. At one point in the movie the protagonists are trying to take shelter in a farmhouse and one guy turns on a nearby wood chipper and the entire fucking swarm just flies right into it and gets mulched.
>>200665478Is that why you view such an big amount of Blacked cuck porn?
>>200665922Embarrassing post, Anon. Do better.
>>200665918Shit. Speaking of this, I saw a movie where a bunch of people go to this third world forestry nice place and there are monsters. The local government knew and the monster was shown on tv and a few people survive at the end. What is the title?
>>200665869Oh you actually think Tate is cool. lmao. He's not making anyone seethe you silly goose. He's a dweeb who needs to astroturf himself into relevance.
>>200666001>He's not making anyone seetheHe obviously is. Stop pretending. You think the nerd dork geeks that is rich wants to reminded his is still nothing but a nerd dork geek. 90% of men are betamales and just wish that 40, they can larp as high value or made it and is respectable and then Tate comes out of nowhere with 20 cars costing 5 million each saying, "no you're still a dork."
>>200665228BTW I also watched Infested (Vermines) and it's a 4,5/10. Story/characters are awful, effects and set pieces are good. It's a bit like Under Paris but the latter has much better cinematography and both movies have a timely aspect to them bc they both subconsciously tap into the growing rejection towards mass immigration/foreigners as an invasive species to be controlled)
Fire up those ovens, we need some fresh bread. Make it spooky.
>>200666126Throw the Redditors in there.
>>200666126Okay, I’ll do it.
>>200666212Chick is overrated
>>200666316>>200666316>>200666316
@200666230Here's your (You)
>>200666386>you denied
>>200666230absolutely not
>>200665628thanks!
>>200643851The X is for X-tra Bonahs!
>>200666846new thread here anon: 200666316
>>200666212Shame that she's a ...you know what
