[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why would Darren Aronofsky do this? Has he just given up?
>>
>>217660915
smart people know that AI will be the film camera of the future, when it gets good people will use it to make profound art.
>>
>>217660915
looks kino

https://youtu.be/7-u8v8nxeOI?si=vj3BmN08OznzFTaK
>>
Test
>>
Maybe wait to see what it looks like before you kvetch
>>
>>217660965
That's what they say about every fad piece of technology. People want you to buy into it because they've invested so much into it.
>>
>>217661068
There's a trailer, retard. Looks like shit
>>
>>217661068
Why? Fuck his thieving Jew ass.
>>
File: maxresdefault (61).jpg (53 KB, 1280x720)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>217661071
Just imagie

>You put on VR headset
>you are in an empty black void
>you tell the computer... "Load up my film crew"
(also celery man)
>You start directing them, you talk to the actors, you film a scene.
>People see it, and you win actual awards.
>>
He made a lot of money from doing that movie for the Sphere in Las Vegas, which didn't actually involve all that much work on his part (90% of it was nature documentary footage that was shot by the company that owned the Sphere before he even joined the project, he just did the terrible frame story) without it damaging his credibility and probably figured this would be the same thing but for even more money
>>
>Has he just given up?
well yeah
didn't you watch caught stealing?
>>
>>217661071
GUISE the printing press is a free money printer... all we have to do is steal the fucking IP of charles dickens and print off his works for fucking nothing.

We make money, the printer ink companies make money... and FUCK WRITERS

T. 1800s industrialist
>>
>>217661126
Stop stealing the VIEW with your EYES!
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4cLKIxt8W8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhin4Bt_lLg
>>
>>217660915
>Why would Darren Aronofsky do this?
He was always a hack.
>>
>>217661170
That's fucking sad
>>
>>217661220
Its also why Edgar Allen Poe was poor. Printing companies refused to pay new writers when they can steal the works of european writers with no consequences
>>
>>217661346
>>217661220
Hey we can do this all over again now that the masses are too dumb to remember that we already did it like 5 times in the past 50 years. Fuck the nepo baby tranny leftie writers anyway amirite goys?!
>>
>>217661191
Soon AI will be legit kino
>>
>>217661071
>fad piece of technology
Yea said the blacksmith making horseshoe during the advent of the automobile
>>
>>217660965
>smart people know that AI will be the film camera of the future
bring on muh lovecraft adaptations
>>
>>217660915
The illuminati tries really hard to normalize AI use everywhere. It’s all pysops.
>>
>>217660915
I bet he loves AI. His break out film was Pi and it cost about $150,000 to make.
>>
>>217660965
They can just get actors. Can't be that smart.
>>
>>217661455
it's still not yet, though. is it? You're selling the speculative idea that maybe one day it will actually be good, as you people or tech companies are saying it be.
>>
File: file.png (418 KB, 700x350)
418 KB
418 KB PNG
>>217661584
It's good for a lot of things. Just like any tool you just need to use it properly

I don't know how you can look at the progress made in the past years and still say things like that
>>
>>217661948
Not him but despite the progress and the untold billions invested it still hasn't produced anything of value.
>>
>>217662006
Based and true
>>
>>217662006
wrong, many scam operations have flourished thanks to AI
>>
>>217662006
wrong, it produced this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twwUcZ4Ujzc
>>
>>217661584
>You're selling the speculative idea
Clearly not just an idea because you can see for yourself that the technology now exists.
>>
>>217660915
He's a jew
>>
>>217662006
How does it feel to be so wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCfAk7E1E4g
>>
>>217660915
Why would I pay to watch this when I can generate it on my phone right now?
>>
>>217661948
Wow it made a picture of faggot nigger eating, that's great. Give yourself a thumbs up your ass.
>>
>>217660915
Where you see cringe an old person sees a crutch and a jew sees an opportunity.
>>
>>217662239
It's nowhere near as good as you need it to be, and it's not going to happen quickly enough.
>>
>>217661546
Actors are whiny and spoiled
>>
>>217662849
The Model T had a top speed of 40mph
>>
>>217662886
wow
>>
>>217660915
>>217661191
Christ.
>>
>>217661191
>AI slop
>AI slop but jewish director
>>
>>217662250
>they say no war ever really ends,
>it just waits for the next young men
Unironically kino af
>>
>>217661191
How did he prompt black British soldiers?
>>
>>217661071
And by the time people realize they aren't making any money off their investment the people who sold them the lie have already bailed out
How many times does this have to happen before they learn
>>
>>217660965
In the hands of plebs, yes. In the hands of MULTI MILLIONAIRE/BILLIONAIRE CORPORATIONS + GOVT, you are fuked.
>>
>>217660915
I want to see what other veteran directors have to say about this, who's gonna be first to tickle his balls and who's gonna be first to bust 'em
>>
>>217661139
and if you don't win any awards, you can just go back into the VR world and give your acceptance speech to a more appreciative audience
>>
>>217660915
Caught stealing was pretty good...
>>
>>217660915
The speculative market is starting to shrink. AI while "exciting" can't produce or make anything to get regular people on board. The only retards pushing it are scammers and poojeets hoping it can suddenly make them not indian
>>
If he uses AI there's no jew producers forcing him to make them all black.
>>
The story can't have a main character because AI can't into consistency. So this is essentially just going to be a slideshow of Grok generated revolutionary war scenes with no actual plot, themes, or artistic elements whatsoever. It's the exact level of quality that AI garbage deserves, the bare minimum from all parties involved, but people like movies because of the people who work on them. AI movies will always look like shit compared to a film that was shot and edited. Even CGI slop had to be handmade. To say nothing of how most movies are carried by actors putting on good performances, which AI can't even begin to replicate. Though getting voice actors helps, I think their range will be limited by the computer's dogshit output.

Fake and gay world.
>>
>>217660915
Couldn't he just rip off Paranoia Agent instead?
>>
>>217665238
did you even watch the trailer
>>
>>217661071
Yeah they were saying this about cameras 100 years ago. Nothing new!
>>
>>217661584
Huh. Maybe pay attention to reality
>>
>>217661126
>thieving
"AI is bad because it steals from artists" is such a red herring argument, I don't give a fuck where the training data came from.
>>
>>217661584
Like most tech advancements, it doesn't have to be good, it just has to be good enough for the public to accept it
>>
>>217662543
You're too stupid to use AI so stop pretending like you have a stake in this conversation. AI is literally writing software, monitoring and classifying datasets and identifying cancers in medical imagery better than humans. You're literally just a child with a child's mind.
>>
>>217660965
Wow anon you are so smart and ahead of the times! I wish I could be as cool as you!!1!
>>
File: 1751140339273253.gif (1.74 MB, 236x307)
1.74 MB
1.74 MB GIF
>>217660965
>smart people know that AI will be the film camera of the future, when it gets good people will use it to make profound art.
Yes, he wants to have later historical bragging rights that he was one of the first directors who started to incorporate it. He wants to see himself as (and be known as) a trailblazer.

The angry plebs making this tech political are so absurd. They'll all be using it in a few years, in various capacities.
>>
Pi is the best movie of all time so ending the carrier with the worst movie all time would be kino.
>>
>>217660915
I hope that it's kino and boost ai movies popularity.. I'm tired of putting up with spoiled rich actors and waiting years for a new season of a series.
>>
File: 1667131693971098.jpg (262 KB, 1284x980)
262 KB
262 KB JPG
>how to permanently ruin your reputation with one simple trick
Lmfao, I was wondering which director was going to come out and completely fucking wreck their reputation by making an AI slop movie, and my money was on Ridley Scott. However, I'm a little surprised Aronofsky decided to be the first one to retroactively ruin his legacy in probably the stupidest way possible, while also trying to bootlick America because Trump is in office.

He genuinely will NEVER be able to wash that fucking disgusting stink off of him now lmfao. It will metaphorically follow him to the grave.
>>
>>217660915
trannyseethekino
>>
>>217667104
People were saying this about early 3D in film. You have pleb-brain. Too fickle and stubborn to get a proper perspective on your emotions to see that they're tied to this particular cultural moment in time.

When Dems are back to running the show, and AI is slowly being incorporated into Hollywood (in projects that totally own all the chuddies), you'll shrug off all your anger about it and be off complaining about the next thing. There is an economic reality to this that isn't going away, and you'll be come to terms with its inevitability when they dress it up in a more pleasing political veneer.
>>
>>217666907
Good for you, post your address.
>>
>>217660965
Remember the Larry David coinbase ad
>>
File: i have give up.jpg (70 KB, 1080x1080)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>217660915
I have given up on life
>>
>>217661139
>(also celery man)
Load up nude Tayne as well, computer.
>>
>>217667350
I don't get it.
>>
>>217662006
Wrong.
https://youtu.be/tlOdillu4FI
>>
>>217667256
GOOOOD MORNING SAAAAR
>>
>>217667607
>when you want to respond and refute anon, but you're too low IQ
Bit frustrating, I'd imagine.

But look -- I have a ball. Would you like to bounce it?
>>
>>217667409
Coincidence
>>
>>217660965
>when it gets good
I can't wait. How many two more weeks are we away?
>>
File: Wut Wario 1.png (514 KB, 1280x720)
514 KB
514 KB PNG
>>217660965
>the amount of Luddite seethe this one post caused
>>
>>217661071
"It's just a fad piece of technology!" is what they say about every technological revolution, faggot. They said the same thing about the Motion-Video Camera. They said the same thing about Electricity. They said the same thing about the Automobile, kek.
>>
>>217667104
>permanently ruin your reputation
With who? Terminally-online trannies? Nobody else gives a shit about your psychotic anti-AI cult.
You seem to have once again confused real life with your terminally-online internet experience.
>>
>>217667665
So you are a poo right?
>>
>>217664712
Computer, load up my "Academy Award Ceremony But Everyone Is Frozen In Time and I Have Unlimited Cumshots" scenario.
>>
>>217667901
Luddite's were legitimately correct.
>>
>>217667104
Holy shit, this retard unironically convinced himself that the rest of humanity has the same kind of histrionic fear of AI that he and his online butt-buddies do.
>>
>>217667965
Normal people don't care for it either. I fucking hate trannies and I hate ai poojeets.
>>
>>217667992
and now their dead LOL
>>
>>217668014
SOURCE?
>>
File: british soldier.png (528 KB, 907x760)
528 KB
528 KB PNG
>>217661191
what did they mean by this?
>>
>>217662006
It produced increased productivity in people afraid of losing their job.
>>
>>217661191
AI slop can't help but niggerfy.
>>
>>217661191
Some of those shots look decent but others look like total trash.
Even if you're using Ai you could at least have some quality control.
>>
File: Wut Crackermilk.jpg (95 KB, 1280x720)
95 KB
95 KB JPG
>No! Nooooo! A Director can't experiment with new film-making technology! No no NOOOOO!!! WAAAAAAAAH!!!

Historians and Sociologists are going to look back on "AI-Derangement Syndrome" with a sense of amusement and pity, the same way we currently look back on medieval peasants thinking slightly unusual but perfectly natural weather phenomena they were unfamiliar with were omens and supernatural portents of the future.
>>
>>217667992
Considering we now live in a fully industrialized, technological world, no they were not.
>>
>>217668073
Why was a Nigger Slave allowed to touch the Official Documents?
>>
>>217667896
>AI will NEVER be able to draw hands!
>>
>>217667975
Failed normies are literally too retarded to defend their own positions when you call them out. They immediately fold and start ebin posting - they don't know what else to do, so they pretend like they're above engaging. Barely sentient.

It's funny that you hate AI, because you're apparently a golem as well.
>>
>>217667607
>>217667975
Why are you so obsessed with Indians?
Is this some kind of werid sexual fixation or something?
>>
>>217661191
This is no different than already existing CGI slop. I bet 90% of people can't tell the difference.
>>
looks badass. i'd rather have this than the fucked up haggard casts we're stuck with in most movies. they seem to have been period accurate too, doesn't look like a bunch of woke shit. after gladiator 2 i'm ready for AI to take over
>>
>>217661139
>This isn't an Oscar-contender until we kick up the 4D3D3
>>
>>217667417
Are you sure?
>>
>>217660915
>has he just given up?
That was called Mother, and yes he did and then some.
>>
>>217667939
Survivorship bias. You remember all the things that werent fads because they’re still around. For every decent piece of tech, there were hundreds of fad technologies lost to the ages.
>nfts
>3d movies
>betamax
>google glasses
>a zillion game consoles
at one point or another they were all THE NEXT BIG THING. Until they werent.
>>
>>217662849
How lacking in self-awarenes and ignorant of historical trends do you have to be to make a statement like this unironically?

"The Model-T isn't fast enough. Therefore Commercial Automobiles will never be a thing."

"ENIAC can only be used to calculate trajectories and other mathematical functions. Therefore Personal Computers will never be a thing."

The fact that the only response I ever see to this argument is idiots going "SAAAAAR" and other non-sequiturs is very, very telling.
>>
>>217668191
Okay poojeet
>>
The naysayers are right this time, and we have plenty of evidence to prove that AI will forever remain soulless slop.
The issue is people are dumber than ever before, more primed and brainwahed to just be the bestest goodest goy comsoomers in history so the majority of people will be fine with it or just not care, and people like me will remain a small minority that refuses to move on and I'm fine with that I guess. I'm not going to embrace AI, I refuse to and I will die for my principles.
>>
>>217668133
Listen, i know you think LLMs are going to somehow become sentient and/or God, and create this endless Generative hyper world of infinite novelty, but the LLMs (AI's true name and descriptor) cannot deviate from its dataset. To make a new universe of ideas, it would require more data than exists in the universe.
>>
>>217668388
>not being able to tell the inherent difference between general and far-reaching technological shift such as Interchangable Parts, Electrical Power, AI, etc., and shit like NFT's
This is just genuinely on you being a brainlet at this point.

We get it: You're irrationally mad at new technology, and you have a desperate egotistical need to be "right".
But nobody's taking you seriously. You're shouting into the void while the world progresses.
And when you're ultimately proven wrong you will at that point simply pretend that you never held the opinions that you are CURRENTLY espousing.
>>
File: falcon5.jpg (41 KB, 400x300)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>217668388
I would get into long arguments about why the Novint Falcon was never going to replace computer mice, even for gaming.
>>
>>217668462
>arguing with a Strawman
I never thought, let alone claimed, any of the bullshit that you are bringing up out of nowhere and then so smugly "refuting".
>>
>>217668443
The tech companies have made big strides with the technology by A. stealing shit like they always do and B. dumping billions of dollars into it. Both of these factors will eventually face correction.
>>
>>217668443
>we have plenty of evidence to prove that AI will forever remain soulless slop
Lol no you don't. The subjective opinions of terminally-online trannies and other anti AI-cultists isn't "evidence". Keep screeching though.
>>
>>217668467
The difference is that AI and NFTs dont really do anything. AI doesn't make any process more efficient because it hallucinates and straight up lies to the user. It's not useful for anything whatsoever other than TikTok videos of a cat playing an accordion in a tornado and AI porn slop.
>>
File: 1698458996602336.jpg (40 KB, 919x635)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>217668388
>You remember all the things that werent fads because they’re still around.
There's a literal AI race between USA and China. It's a global-hegemon level struggle that's taxing compute all over the world, and you're comparing it to betamax?

Please stop with this cope. Enough of this.
>>
>>217667939
Yeah bro just like laserdiscs and metaverse.

Jesus christ this board has been overrun by jeets.
>>
>>217668489
>stealing shit
Lmao so piracy IS "stealing" now?
Fucking Hell, I love seeing 4chan of all places reverse the opinions they've maintained for TWENTY FUCKING YEARS just so they can clutch pearls the second it becomes convenient for an argument they wanr to make. This shit is hialrious.
>>
>>217668518
>AI doesn't really do anything
Holy shit the brainlet statements ITT are AMAZING.
>>
>>217668521
See: >>217668467
>>
>>217668133
People are already addicted to AI in a syndrome-like fashion. We're gonna look back and document the exact reverse, "Delusional AI Anthropomorphizing".
>>
>>217668550
So remind me, which of the AI companies is currently turning a profit?
>>
>>217668532
Piracy doesn't involve making money off it, typically. That's the difference. Take random bits of songs, smush them together, and then try to make money off it without being sued. You can't.
>>
>>217668521
>Yeah bro just like laserdiscs and metaverse.
It's completely restructuring the nature of warfare. Drones are just the start. Not to mention what it's doing in fields like medicine and electrical engineering.

All these "laserdiscs" and "betamax" copes are so funny. You faggots are in complete denial.
>durr I made a pithy sarcastic post so it's definitely a fad
Okay, bro.
>>
>>217668521
>still naming specific formats and brand-names rather than the actual technology behind them

It's brainlet hour on /tv/.
The fact that specifically Laserdisc format isn't around is irrelevant, retard. Optical Media is still fucking ubiquitous.
The fact that specifically Metaverse or whatever didn't take off is irrelevant. VR shit is still huge and still being developed.
Whether individual AI ventures succeed or fail is irrelevant: AI is still going to be a thing and still going to progress. It's not going anywhere.

This board is an absolutely amazing example of idiots being convinced that they are 20 times smarter than they actually are. You say the most incredibly low-IQ things with the most AMAZING levels of pompus, smug confidence.
>>
>>217668520
Yeah, and do you know what they use this AI thing for? lmao
>>
>>217668582
>People are already addicted to AI
Nigger, the fuck are you even talking about now?
>>
>>217668599
Pirating a product rather than paying for it is a net "profit" for the person pirating it, semantic-troon.

>Nooooo, it's moral and okay when I do it! It's EVIL when the corpo does it!!!
>>
>>217668687
>is a net "profit" for the person pirating it
Right. Like the old joke about pirating the same game a thousand times to bankrupt a company.
>>
File: Soyboy Crying Rage.jpg (9 KB, 233x217)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>217668591
>Hank Green said that the 500-billion dollar industry lost 1.5 billion this year! They'll be gone ANY DAY NOW!
>>
>>217668582
Bitch sure
Ask yourself this
What do you, yes, you, even use for daily?
>>
>>217668692
If "piracy isn't stealing", then a corpo "pirating" images that technically belong to someone else to become 0.0001% of their new AI's total data-set isn't "stealing" either.

It's genuinely as simple as that. Seethe about it all you want but claiming anything else is just genuine petty hypocrisy.
>>
>>217668582
if I have to pretend women are sapient at least let me pretend my robot friend is too
>>
>>217668759
>then a corpo "pirating" images that technically belong to someone else to become 0.0001% of their new AI's total data-set isn't "stealing" either.

You're already wrong on this. It's not academic anymore. They have and will continue to draw up rules about who gets what royalties for things fed into the AI. YOU can sit here and make up whatever shit you want to make up. The people actually in charge already consider it stealing.
>>
>>217668658
Not him, but there are already people who are altering their lives because of what some AI chatbot has told them, people who outsource significant work to AI regardless of the quality of the output, and people who spend a significant portion of their day ingesting AI generated nonsense. I don't know if you'd call it addiction, but there's definitely something going on.
>>
File: IMG_3519.jpg (222 KB, 1024x1024)
222 KB
222 KB JPG
>>217668462
It's already creating novel things though. You can spin up something entirely new right now.
>>
>>217660915
>Why would Darren Aronofsky do this?
Big tech is gonna pay prominent directors more money than they've ever seen to give AI movies a sense of legitimacy
>>
>>217668462
Govs. don't really care about all these ponderous existential questions, that's mainly a narrative vehicle for investment.

What they care about are practical things like AI's ability to revolutionize warfare. That does matter. All this other bickering over "art slop" etc doesn't matter at all to them. Just something for the rabble to distract themselves.
>>
>>217668718
>what do you even use for daily?
???
>>
>>217668814
That's not novel, it's a probabilistic amalgamation of the dataset.
>>
>AI on a long enough timeline will make "Art" better than humans
It will know what 'buttons' to press. One day, it'll write the script/direct/make the movie/book/painting where we all go,"Shit". It's over.

Human creativity will dwindle because it cannot compete.

>I mean what we have now are just LLMs, so just smart autocompletes but true AI will dumpster us in all meaning.
>>
Honestly I like funny AI videos and I wouldn't mind if there was like a Tiktok like app that was just funny AI videos. I would like that better than watching some retard talk in their car
>>
>>217660915
I don't get it.. just watch John Adams
>>
>>217668794
>They have and will continue to draw up rules about who gets what royalties for things fed into the AI
They've ALREADY drawn up laws that say "piracy IS illegal" and "piracy IS stealing", dipshit. That happened in the fucking late 90's/early 00's.

If your argument is "me pirating movies and software is okay, but corporations 'pirating' images for AI data isn't!", then arguing with what the law says was NOT the way to go, retard. Because the law ALREADY states that you pirating movies and software is theft and also illegal.

Holy shit, been a while since I've seen a retard shoot themselves in the foot THAT fucking hard.
I'd like to congratulate this thread on being a stellar example of an absolute Brainlet Parade.
>>
>>217669122
A law is only worth something if it's enforceable. You're arguing morality which is ironic because you seem like a real shithead. I'm not even making arguments. I'm telling you what has been decided already.
>>
>>217661030
Wow this looks insane. Old media is dead, this just buried it.
>>
who cares as long as he's using real voice actors? Animation goes back more than a hundred years, and the voice actors get paid either way.
>>
>>217669151
>calls everyone else brainlet retards
>can't even get IS and IS NOT correct
>>
>>217662006
>it hasn't produced anything *I* value
Fixed that for you.
Thankfully, nobody cares what some autistic shut-in on 4chan values or does not value. Plenty of other people have had AI produce things that they enjoyed one way or another. Hell, the seethe that AI's mere existence inspires in pseudo-intellectual brainlets like you has been entertaining enough.
>>
>>217669194
>Autocorrect fucked up your post once before you corrected it! That means I win and you lose!

If that's how you have to cope, I guess go right ahead.
>>
>>217669193
>and the voice actors get paid either way.

Why the fuck would you even care about that you twitterbrained imbecile?
>>
>>217669159
>I'm telling you what has been decided already.
It has already long been decided that you pirating movies and software IS "stealing" and is in fact illegal. So your argument was wrong, and you even went the extra mile of proving YOURSELF wrong.
>>
>>217669239
It wasn't the mistake (I didn't even catch it before you deleted the post). It was you being such a shit head that you added more insults to your post after editing it.
>>
>>217669193
I think the world would be a better place if voice actors didn't get paid
>>
>>217668960
Yeah honestly I just find myself happier watching AI videos instead of real people.
>>
>>217669259
I guess that's why piracy was completely ended the same way music being sampled by AI is going to pay royalties like any other use of it.
>>
>>217669262
Fascinating non-sequitur.
The fact remains that I'm correct and you're still wrong and angry about it.
>>
>>217669267
I am pro voice actor but not for "celebrity" voice actors. There's some world class voice actors but hollywood paying celebs millions for work that can be done cheaper and better to someone else is wild.
>>
>>217668713
>can't name a single one
>>
>>217669283
Now you're reaching into the bag of "internet argument terms"? You know better than me, shithead, so where does that leave us? Anyone can continue to sample music in AI systems for free forever? If you want to place a bet on that go ahead.
>>
>>217669277
>I guess that's why piracy was completely ended
I mean...it obviously wasn't. Or was that the very point you were trying to make?
If you were trying to be sarcastic you didn't make your argument very clear, but that would still be correct, yes.
>>
File: 1547870926565.jpg (11 KB, 286x237)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>217661139
>Just imagine


Let me break it down for you,
>Amazon's "DIRECTor Seat Program" is $49.99/mo for the base package, which only has three unique film crews.
>20 minutes max, pay more for longer filming sessions
>Film crews require separate payment plan to store preferences, base package has them only remember up to the latest project
>Blood, gore, nudity and foul language are not allowed.
>Depictions of Israel unless you show your Birthright card are not allowed
>Ads play every 5 minutes, they can be turned off with a subscription
>Actors are idiots, film crew are idiots. They understand the point of the demand but not the essence behind it
>Every show *requires* at least 40% minorities
>>
>>217669306
>Now you're reaching into the bag of "internet argument terms"?
No, retard. What's happening is your hyper fixating on irrelevant minor typos resulting from Autocorrect after Improved your dipshit argument wrong.

The fact remains that crying about companies "stealing" for AI data, on 4chan of all places, which has insisted that "piracy isn't stealing!!!" and labeled ANY suggesting the contrary a "corporate bootlicker", is massively hypocritical to the point of being laughable.
You tried to claim that no, it WAS "different", supposedly due to what you insist the Law will EVENTUALLY say, which is an invalid argument because the Law has ALREADY determined that you pirating is, in fact, "stealing".
>>
>>217669297
The fact that some companies didn't have a profit in one specific year is irrelevant.
You're like a faggot arguing that consumer automotives will never be a thing because the Ford Motor Company lost money in the 1908 fiscal year.
>>
>>217662218
>>217662250
>sounds like fucking shit
Kill yourselves.
>>
File: ComfyUI_07731.png (3.19 MB, 1280x2048)
3.19 MB
3.19 MB PNG
>>217660915
>prime goon tech
>gens old men in wigs
How fucking gay is this guy?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.