[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: The Chumscrubber 2005.jpg (150 KB, 1300x956)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
What makes the Y2K aesthetics so cool?
>>
For one, movies were still shot on film and the people involved were still able to properly light a scene and do a half decent composition, instead of leaving it all to some Jeet behind the computer.
>>
>>218936360
Slightly ugly yet beautifully lifelike 90s cameras mixed with early digital age. It's the reason action had a renaissance during this era, it's all about style.
>>
People were still alive back then. We were already falling off, but hadn't quite yet plummeted. Think of a roller coaster cresting the peak at its halfway point: you're too far gone, but not all gone yet.
>>
>>218936360
There was pressure to be competent and on-point.
>>
File: ddltwbb.png (765 KB, 1104x610)
765 KB
765 KB PNG
>>218937657
>on break?
>stare at phone
>going to the store on foot?
>stare at phone
>walking the dog?
>stare at phone
If someone is like this I genuinely don't classify them as human. They're just another phone drone.
>>
>>218936360
You just have shit taste, faggot.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.