NOOOOOOOOOOOYOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO WATCH MOVIES THAT DON'T HAVE ZANDAYA ANNA HATHAWAY AND PEDRO PASCAL IN THEM
You really think a24 is some underdog production company
>>220867421Imagine how much Skibidi Toilet could make
>>220867421What are you talking about?
I will watch this for Renate, my waifu
>>220867421I'm failing to see what the appeal could possibly be.
>>220867502if you don't get it, you're part of the problem
I actually went to watch this movie with a couple of friends just for fun. There is just one major issue with the movie. It's not even about the backrooms. After we see the backrooms they move a long and never use any of the meme shit in it about being hunted and such.
>>220867421>a24Oh so it’s trash
Wonder how much this is going to fall off when zoomers realize its about a 50 year old depressed alcoholic
>>220867757That's why it is so good, boomer
>>220867462It quite literally is by definition.>b-but a24 is mainstream, m-maybe it was the underdog years ago b-but not anymore! t-they have money now!Completely irrelevant.
>>220868178this post really confuses me>you're wrong, by definition>>here's why you're right>Completely irrelevant.
>>220867596
>>220868281>no retortThat's right, concession accept.
>>220867576This was supposed to be Cristin Milioti...
>>220868355look man, if you wanna talk to people you don't need to pretend to be retardedlet's have an honest conversation, which A24 movie did you enjoy the most or the least?
>>220868388>ad hominemThat's right, concession accepted.
oh well, I tried
>>220868388>oh no he gapped me hard, better deflect and start pretending like I want to talk about films
>>220867421ok "kane" I will watch your slop even though the cute woman dies immediately and the black guy is the only character for most of the "film"I love stolen creepy pasta kino!
>>220867421It's a tik tok memeNever seen a more advertised a24 productionIt's genuinely mediocre no one's talking about itThe drop off after this weekend is gonna be a little drasticIt won't make as much money as obsession
implying I'll watch this slop either
>>220867421how does a direct to streaming movie make box office? they just make stuff up?
>>220867936>That's why it is so good, boomerthe retards being paid to shill this shit do not know how to communicate with 4chans anonymous
>>220867462>>220867462they are. They've never had a big-budget movie and them grossing $100M is still considered a big deal.
this is all marketing btw
>>220868380What’d she audition for, the monster?
>>220867421I don't care if Zendaya isn't in it, the entire idea behind this movie is utterly vapid zoomer retardation. I wouldn't watch this dogshit unless I got paid to.
>>220868409Does your father know his son spends his free time acting like a retard on the internet? I can't imagine the level of shame he must feel on a daily basis knowing he raised a failed son.
>>220868178Ah yes, Amazon is still an underdog company because it once operated out of a garage.
>movie that exists thanks to a retarded /x/ greentext posterat least moot nor hiromoot are getting jackshit money from this.
>>220868708That's a lot of projection.That's right, concession accepted.
>>220868495ok steve great job shilling
>>220868733A24 is competing against hollywood studios worth billions of dollars that have existed for like like a hundred years or something in some cases, amazon isn't so good job proving his point.
>>220868449>cute woman dies immediatelyWhoever told you that didn't watch it.
>>220867421Great I'd much rather see black man therapy session than Anne Hathaway.
>>220868471Is in theatres anon.
>>220868917Right, just keep moving the goalposts: A24 needs 100 years and billions of dollars before we stop seeing it as a fledgling, I agree.They're a very successful production company a well-established "brand". You think because they haven't helped gross 2 billion dollars on a single film that they're weak. You're retarded.
>>220869255I think you need to look up what the meaning of "underdog" is.
>>220868917Elden Ring is gonna suck shit. The Chris Hansen movie might be ok.
A similar thing that happened in the 60s, big studio productions started flopping and independent director-controlled cinema became the norm in the 70s
>>220869480It always happens because Hollywood becomes stale and nepotistic. In the 60s it was heavy reliance on the same genre films and same actors in everything, over and over, people got sick of it
crazy how much backrooms riled up this dying nursing home lmao, I haven't seen this amount of seething in yearsunironically tempted to go for a second watch just to rile you senile retards up kek
>>220869788>go for a second watch just to rile you senile retards upplease explain how seeing it a second (or third or eight) time would rile anyone up?
>>220869480>>220869556I honestly wonder why retards still think the current FOTM crap will have an effect on anything down the line, here's the thing, it won't, just like every past FOTM crap that DiscussingShill and every other twitter tranny talked about
>>220869413>a person, team, or group competing in a contest or struggle who is largely expected to loseCopied this for you since you needed it. Do you honestly expect A24 to "lose" any time soon? After how many successes?They're not some small nobody who we can expect to disappear tomorrow. They're established -- even well known by people who aren't "film fanatics" -- and they make money. They're also private, they don't need to continually grow like Disney; profit is good enough.Please stop watching cartoons and read a book. You're functionally illiterate and borderline retarded.
>>220871015>Copied this for youI know the meaning. You copied it for yourself, as you didn't know what it meant until now lmao.
>>220871039>zero rebuttal>l-lmaoYou're weak. I accept your concession, dunce.
>>220871068You literally had to search for the meaning, you lost before you even began.
>>220871084>doubling down on retarded gibberishAh jeez dude, this is embarrassing for you, huh? How many times would you like to lose here? You're at 2, but we can keep going.
>>220871145You've spent two hours thinking about me and my post. There's no "winning" this for you because I'm already in the walls living rent free. You even attempted to sagepost at page 10 to try to get the last word like a fucking autist to no avail lmao.It actually boggles my mind that you just looked at the meaning of the word but somehow entirely missed what it means. Then again, you seem completely retarded so, figures.
>>220871264Jeez, that's a long way to STILL have zero rebuttal, fag.3 losses, now, thanks!
>>220871145>>220871297nta but he's right, a24 is an underdog. this is kind of embarrassing for you
>>220871297There's nothing to refute. Nothing you have copied or argued refutes that A24 is the underdog, if anything.>b-but A24 is not a small nobodyBeing the underdog has nothing to do with that. You should actually try reading the meaning of the word.
Call a spade a spade. a24 is not an underdog, but their business model does revolve around low risk high reward gambles that have been paying out lately.
>low risk>gambleyou good?
>>220871319>another retard with no explanation of A24 "losing"Sure, why not? I can take more Ws.>>220871361A24 not making something like Avengers: Infinity War doesn't make them "losers". You think they need a billion dollars at the box office every movie? What are they "losing", dummy? They MAKE money, that's winning?? Fucking moron.You've said nothing with like 7 posts. I've accepted your concession, why are you being a sore loser about it?
>>220871015>and they make moneythis is a self-defeating argument
>>220871452>this is a self-defeating argument
>>220871441>You've said nothing with like 7 posts.You have said nothing in all of yours.Now you are trying to deflect about the meaning of "winning" when you never stated what you consider winning yourself.And being the underdog has nothing to do with winning. You LITERALLY have not read the meaning of being the underdog.
>>220871488>still nothing about losing, the meaning of the word>anon happily still losing himselfIs this an avant garde performance? 4 wins for me, now. Maybe more.
>>220871474Correct. If you standard of winning is "they make money", any company making less than other is the underdog. A24 in this context makes less than other big Hollywood studios, therefor, it is the underdog.
>>220871527>still nothing about losing, the meaning of the wordWhat is this even supposed to mean? You need to calm down and properly convey what you are saying.
>>220871401You can throw $1 to red. It's a gamble even if it is low risk.
low budget movies, espcially horror, are expected to lose against movies made by corporate slop giants like disney. put the mandalorian and grogu vs a 10 million dollar budget horror movie by a 20 year old who's never directed a feature beforeidk where your impotent rage is coming from but it's pathetic
>>220868853>>220867462have they ever had even a single movie crack the Top 10 for a year in terms of either revenue or budget? What's their highest budget film and how does that compare to actual production companies?
>>220871532For the studios, making money is winning. It's staying afloat -- what they make is secondary to that, always.>any company making less than other is the underdogNo. Someone didn't read the definition I so helpfully posted.They are in a different caliber from, say, Disney, yeah: they won't make a billion dollars on a single film any time soon. They don't occupy the same space and it's not a direct competition. If A24 started trying to make superhero movies you may have an argument, but they don't, so you don't. They know their place and they're doing, get this: quite well. They are not only NOT losing, they're the titan of their tier. They are the opposite of an underdog.Saying "well, someone else is doing better somewhere!" is just childish mentality at best. There are so many examples of this in other forms of business: happily staying at lower rung and being profitable."Underdog" is the wrong word to use for A24, especially after they've established themselves and have occupied their space quite profitably for a while now. Only if they change their plan will they be an underdog, and that would be foolish.>>220871563You've said logical nothing about A24 "losing", even still. Go ahead and read above why you're still retarded. 6 wins, thanks!
A24 really needed this win after all their movies have been flopping hard
>>220867421Why is the main character a negro?
an underdog that wins is still an underdog
>>220871754>"Yes, making money is the endgame of a studio">"No, making more money doesn't make you more successful"You are a pathetic sore loser. You need to understand that you have lost, you know you have lost and everyone in the thread knows you have lost. No amount of smug posts are gonna change that.
Why are Blumhouse jumpscare brainlets still seething at A24chads?
>>220871808I wish I was as dumb as you, that must be nice. 7 wins, now, thanks!
>>220871843>no retortUh oh.
>>220867462>>220868178tangentially related but mainstream hollywood absolutely fucking despises A24 for this reason, because it's a comparatively small production company that repeatedly shows that lesser known actors and smaller budgets can still rake in solid returns whilst also making movies which aren't half bad. You may recall the huge wave of artificial shilling disparaging Chalamet towards the start of this year. That was in part because the success of Marty Supreme, and his public confidence with regards to his performance in it, whilst being produced by A24, ruffled a lot of feathers in the industry (an industry whose larger heavy hitters are repeatedly facing disappointment at the box office and thus are feeling VERY fucking insecure when a company who isn't "one of them" starts punching above its weight).
>>220871858note I'm not trying to say chalamet is a lesser known actor here, more that him starring in an A24 film but drumming up a huge media storm about it and boasting abotu his performance pissed off bigger hollywood people who felt insecure about its success on account of it being an a24 film
>>220871754>>220871674
>>220871855>no uThat made me laugh, good one; but I've had your concession for ages now. 8 wins, thanks!
>>220871878see>>220871808
>>220868708Yes, problem?
>>220871674Low budget horror has been a box office goldmine for decades now? What the hell does this mean?
>>220871882Yes I saw it, it's still wrong. And?
>>220871941>no retortUh oh.
>>220871922>Low budget horror has been a box office goldmine for decades now?Relative to their budgets, they never pulled billions like Goy Wars or capeshit.
>>220871958>anon just wants to dance with me AND give me more WsAlright, but I'm not giving your concession back. 9 wins, thanks!>>220871980And? They're reliable victories. They don't make ALL of the money, they just good money. Why is that bad?I'm going to Costco now, thanks for the wins; that one retard can keep replying to me if he wants since he loves me so much. Read a book!
>>220872062see>>220871808
>>220872062>I'm leaving b-but because I want to o-okay?!lol, concession acceptedyou better run because otherwise I'll get the last words and that means I win, you know this is true which is why you tried to sagepost at page 10
>>220872062No one says its bad people are just surprised they managed to BTFO millenniunc slop.
>$10 million budget>first time director>movie based on a 4chan post>independent arthouse studiohow is this not an underdog exactly
>>220872242because the autist that can't handle being told he's wrong said so
>>220872242What's so hard to get? If the company made $1 in profit, it can't be an underdog. Simple as.
>>220872309haha
>>220867421The skibidi movie will break 1 billion.
>>220872815The 6 7 movie will break 67 billies
>>220868917Sometimes less is more.Like programmers in the 90s making great video games on like 5 MBs of memory to work with
>>220873190Video games keep getting better instead of regressing like movies. None of those 5 MB games still hold up.
>>220873370He's talking about the technical aspect. Modern games are poorly optimized and most of them are held together by DLSS/FSR.
