I finally made a twitter and instantly got banned for dunking on streetshitters. Seems like anything goes as long as you dont insult bharat

>>220939667
What did you say? I dunk on them all the time. Or was this pre elon?

>>220939667
Probably more to do with mass reporting, even foids can't compare to the tides of jeet rage

>>220939731
This just happened today. Idk i always get shadowbanned while everyone else has fun. :,(

>>220939610
I've never seen women get so fucking mad over one tweet.

>>220939769
Women are the Jews of gender. One of the most painful things for them is having their bullshit accurately described to their faces in front of an audience with no way to suppress it.

fucking kek

File: comingsoon.png (2.54 MB, 1537x1023)

2.54 MB PNG

>>220939667

this movie feels like it was made specifically for women to make “hot takes” out of which is why I shan’t watch it

>>220939769
This desu I didn't even know this seeking out my rapist was a thing wtf
t. incel

>>220940243
yeah, exactly
>erm, this is why men having desires gets people hurt...
You know what? I don't fucking care.

>>220940272
The point is that they weren't raped by the individuals in question, but they tell those close to them that they were, and emotionally require those around them to believe and affirm this narrative, and ignore evidence to the contrary, such as a commitment to social contact with the "rapist" in a largely private setting (e.g. DMs). They're being called on their shit, and they've used to sacred "rape" card to obscure that shit, and you're not allowed to deny that play. A guy that excited them fucked them, and didn't want a relationship, so to cope with this they call it rape, and you have to go along with it. Denying them the power to fuck with the truth like that for their own benefit is kryptonite to a lot of women.

>>220940243
>this movie
movie?

>>220939752
What did you say?

>>220939667
>>220939734
>>220939752
happened to me on both my accounts. look at the TwiXer subr*ddit and you'll see tons of people complaining

>>220939610
i don't get it

>>220939769
they're actually livid about it lmfao not a single reply between the op tweet and a guy who copied it but changed the year has a single women even trying to justify it at all, they're just yelling

File: 7ab0641f552b34f058180f7cb(...).jpg (38 KB, 605x586)

38 KB JPG

SAD!

>>220939769
The foid is immunized against all dangers: One may call her a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, roastie, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But call her a rape enjoyer and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured he is, how she suddenly shrinks back: 'I've been found out'

File: wsarfpcpcpc.jpg (59 KB, 680x636)

59 KB JPG

Women have rape-coded fetishes and their relationship preferences reflect those rape-coded fetishes. They traverse their demonic hell realm of serial "monogamy" in search for the one that validates the fetish the most.

They would abandon a 7 year long relationship if their zaddy rapist fetish wasn't being fulfilled. Male vulnerability contradicts this complex which is why they monkeybranch away whenever they see their boyfriend shed a tear.

The majority of modern females go out of their way to only choose relationships where they are literally infantilized. They fetishize pseudo-incetuous father figure archetypes. They are perpetually only attracted to skewed power dynamics. (While pretending to criticize age-gaps) They are animals that want to parasite off a man "more powerful" than them as they get "play"-raped and choked by these same pseudo-dads. (While pretending to be anti-patriarchal)

Most of what females(tm) shriek about can easily be rebuked by realizing they have an unironic rape fetish that informs their entire being. No, really! And they want you to take them seriously for it.

File: Screenshot 2025-10-25 233503.png (85 KB, 559x697)

85 KB PNG

>>220941637

>>220941669
>... i-i just want someone who can play halo 3 co-op
>what's t-taking our waiter so long?

>>220941637
>>220941669
Letting women vote and have professional lives without their husband's consent was a tremendous mistake.

Anyone who has had a pretty gf has experienced this at least once.
>stay a week at my ex's place
>notice how she gets ig messages every 10 minutes
>ask her about it
>"ugh it's just some random guys, anon. They know I have a boyfriend, don't worry about it"
>ask her to show me her messages
>countless of creepy guys who tell her they want to fuck her
>notice one dude that she actually replies to
>clear sexual innuendo from his part
>"ugh you are overreacting, anon, he's just a friend and has a girlfriend too"
>tell her to stop playing dumb
>tell her "ok, if that's so, send him a message telling him you are home alone"
>5 FUCKING SECONDS LATER
>"send me your address"
I started laughing hard. Pretty much told her "I don't want to date someone who everyone else sees as a whore/easy lay".
She started blocking everyone and gave me access to all her social media afterwards.
I broke up with her for other reasons, but it's hilarious how women pretend that the army of orbiters that they have wouldn't fuck them the instant they have confirmation to do so.

>>220941669
This isnt as complex as she's making it out to be
Women want strength and want to be on the safe side of that stregnth, where they're protected but can easily feel "oppression" in safe doses. This is because they know that if a man can destroy them, he can protect them and their children. It's not complicated.

>>220939610
Women are retarded but so are you fags. No wonder 60% of men under 30 are single.

>>220941878
While it's possible that girl was "playing dumb", it's also equally reasonable to assume she was actually, in fact, stupid as fuck

>>220939667
I called Kylian Mbappe a monkey. Messing with subhuman football stars does the trick as well.

>>220941883
...Therefore they believe in gender roles. But only the ones that allows them to fulfill their parasitic nature. Unfortunately for them, the universe does not allow people to have their cake and eat it. Everything has a cost including the illusion of 'inherent value'. The delusional fathers that gave them this idea will not be alive anymore to reinforce it.

>>220941883
that's double speak for "do things for me because i'm a coddled golem with no soul". true matrimony requires equal sacrifice and equal love. anything else is debauchery.

>>220939610
Good.
Fuck incels.

>>220941909
She was dumb in an endearing way. I get that for pretty women, all the male attention becomes normalized so they are unable to understand that men want to fuck.
But women simply refuse to block and ignore the creepy dudes.
For men, it's given that if you date a pretty woman, there will be an infinite supply of thirsty dudes that will want to fuck her.
And again, the "I don't want to date someone who other men think is a whore" really got to her lol.

Fuck misogynists, fuck misandrists, they're both completely retarded. Misanthropes know what's up. Humanity is a complete failure.

>>220941878
I told my ex 50 times that her "friend" was clearly in love with her and orbiding, for literal months I told her. But no, "he's just a good friend"
Then one day she tells me "You won't believe what happened, x tried to make a move on me! I think the friendship is over..."
Yes, dumb bitch, of course I believe what happened, I predicted it months ago and not because of visions from Apollo

>>220939769
Remember "Your body my choice"?

>>220939610
>I CAN'T just block the guy who "raped" me because... because...

File: 1753266615964434.jpg (60 KB, 1000x500)

60 KB JPG

>>220939752
it do be like that sometimes

>>220939610
Go on goodreads. Look up reviews for any dubcon/noncon book written by women for women. Look at the 1 star reviews and you'll find women talking about how disgusting men are based on fictional characters.

>>220939769
Hits way too close to home, they know it's true

>>220941955
To be fair, many modern men want traditional roles but only as it favours them. They don’t want to be stoic, hard working, responsible and so on. They just want to LARP that they’d be gladiator Vikings if not for the trappings of modern society, while what they really want is to keep up with their Peter Pan manchild complex but with a beautiful virgin tradgirl falling in their lap and loving them for all their flaws.

In that broad’s post she’s circling the truth which is essentially what >>220941883 states. But she is so oversocialized and brainwashed by modern feminism that she can’t recognize what is staring her in the face. So she’ll go on bouncing from empty relationship to empty relationship ultimately being childless and alone OR having a single child at the age of 37.

Women are extremely impressionable and susceptible to group think. If you throw a roastie in a circle of good mothers with strong morals she will conform very quickly. Unfortunately modern western women have been led astray so promiscuity, self destructive progressive values and even harming themselves and their family (eg turning their son trans to look cool to the other moms) are the values they strive for. Never identifying that these are the causes for that emptiness that pills can’t quite take the edge off.

I think you guys are missing the point
This story is so common not because the woman got raped and liked it, because not that many rapes actually happen.
This story is so common because it was completely consensual sex which she regretted but also did not regret, and calls it "rape" so she can act the victim in front of you. She was never raped, she just wants to look less of a whore than what she is.

Women can enjoy rape, but if your gf tells you she won't block her """rapist""", that's not what's ACTUALLY going on. You are getting cheated on, that's what's going on.

>>220942187
It's both.

>>220942197
It's like 1% actual rapes and 99% what I said
Most women never experience rape, the worst they experience is a slap on the butt.
But every single one of them has some fucking insane sob story of rape and abuse.

>>220939667
I get banned before I even make a post as Elon has Palentir track all your online activity and even though it doesn't look like there is any trace left (different IP, different PC, different phone number, different e-mail) they ban me anyway because 10 years ago I was insulting mexicans on twitter.

>>220941878
Based solutions, I tried to get my retarded ex to do the same and she kept deflecting. Eventually I just told her that she's a fucking moron for either pretending or just not wanting to admit that most guys only hang around women to fuck, even I only talked to her at first because i was ATTRACTED. Eventually I just got tired of wondering and dumped her, I dont go looking for trouble but where's theres smoke. Unfortunately I wasted 4yrs with the bitch, but the next is getting snuffed out on the spot if this "I have male besties I've known for over XYZ years" bullshit pops up.

>>220939667
I got banned even though I did nothing but repost and like

>>220940080
>>220941536
I want you to all listen and listen clearly. Women are the final frontier. It sounds ridiculous, I'm aware. Yet it's true.
>Can criticize blacks or Hispanics if it's about masculinity/not voting blue enough
>nobody defends jeets anyway
>troons get thrown under the bus when it comes to feminists
>liberal Zionists will shit on muzzies if it's to support Israel
> Jews are losing their immunity status thanks to Palestine Israel
Women are going to be the final "protected group" fellas.
After Jews, it's women.
> You are incapable of criticizing women.
> Women are always meet with exceptionalism claims
>any time you criticize them, then it's an issue of "individual women" even though they have no problem collectivizing
>misandry and radfems, like Zionists, are openly supported

>>220939610
I’m confused, what happened?

Maybe it's an ok movie but I won't be watching it. I am sick of movies being forced to have a message. I won't watch propaganda. If it's just a movie about a guy making a bad wish and it monkey paws him in the ass, that's a fine movie. I won't be watching propaganda about how men are bad because they want to be loved, and if that is not what the message is, I don't care what the message is. Movies should not have a message. It should be fun and interesting, not propaganda to tell you how to think. Fuck pseudo-intellectuals.

>>220941669
This is literally an AI slop post.

>>220942307
Women who have male friends are always a red flag. And don't even get me started with women who act like one of the bros.
They are the homewrecker version of male friendship circles kek

>>220939610
How is it anatomically possible to make your mouth into a thin line like that?

>>220942342
I agree, I was gonna watch because it looked like good slop horror, but as the days go on I'm seeing more and more chatter from bitches who are latching onto this movie like slugs and only to push their gender bullshit and not cause its a good or bad movie in general.

>>220941878
exact same with my and my second gf when we were like 23 lmao. some women lie and say they have no idea these guys would fuck them if they asked, but a lot genuinely have no idea. my gf was the former and was clearly enjoying the flirting but someone like my sister just assumes her orbiters are really just interested in her and her boring life and average posts, like hundreds of guys on her socials

women must think they're the most interesting creatures on Earth

>>220942353
Even funnier is when they're bi and they use the "so I cant female friends either cause you think I'll fuck them?" just to deflect from the males they dont want to get rid of. Like first of all, bi women dont cheat with women, they either go full lesbian or are poly. I've never heard of a bi woman cheating with a another woman unless she hasn't fully accepted she's gay.

>>220942352
lol

>>220942381
Oh trust me, they know deep down, even your sister, they can lie to themselves a lot but deep down they know the truth

File: kd4qqQF.jpg (199 KB, 1080x1397)

199 KB JPG

>>220939610

>>220942381
>but a lot genuinely have no idea

anon that's what they TELL you. humans are dumb as fuck but our biology and attraction is hard fucking wired. How a male interacts with a female on a attraction level vs just day to day platonic is like night and day. The problem is women cant handle rejection, including friendship, so when a woman likes a guy as a friend and he wants otherwise, she cant handle it. Her mind goes into spins wondering why a guy would only want her sexually (even though she knows) and comes to the conclsuion
>Well I like this guy enough to hang around him....but I know he kinda wants to fuck me....I know! I'll pretend we're the best of friends and keep telling him and myself that over and over until I stockholm myself into thinking the friendship is real

That's why they look like morons when its revealed their guy friend of 20yrs would absolutely fuck

>>220939610
they must be big mad if theyre bring out the [mass negative event] unrelated and saying its deserved

>>220941669
Women need to be fucking beaten. This is what women need. Every single thing in this post makes me hate women more. Only men are actually capable of feeling love, and unbelievably cruel that men have been made to love these fucking vermin.

Women need to be enslaved. That's the only answer. What women "want" is uniformly evil. The Romans didn't give women names, and they were right not to. Women should be referred to by their last name exclusively until married and should be the legal property of their closest male relative until married, when their husband may give them a name.

Anything less than this will simply lead to hypergamous nightmare. Women have convinced me, the most dystopian regime of female disempowerment ought to be the fucking standard.

>>220942461
I don't agree in some parts.
The reason why women friendzone men isn't because they don't want to "ruin the relationship" by dating them. It's because deep down they know that the dude's only reason for friendship is because he deludes himself that eventually he can earn her heart.
Women know that they make terrible companions in any setting which isn't a romantic/carnal one. The women who friendzone men do so because they know that the only reason for the man to pursue said friendship is for the promise of sex. The moment that the man realizes that said promise will never come, the attention, care and relationship that the woman gets is gone.

And I'm not blaming women for friendzoning men either. I consider that men who get friendzoned are cowardly and manipulative. And are the ones actually deluding themselves into a relationship where they serve as a figurative emotional cumrag for the females that lure them into said relationships.

>>220942461
>How a male interacts with a female on a attraction level vs just day to day platonic is like night and day
Not if someone is a loser, socially retarded and autistic. When a man flirts with a woman you can tell instantly but many men don't have that, the woman doesn't feel anything when he is near them, the attempts at flirting are too autistic, the emotions are too closed off. She doesn't see a man who is interested in her so she assumes you don't like her.
A lot of men are incapable of talking to women in a way that doesn't come off as platonic. A lot of time the man tries too hard to be respectful and not come off as a creep, so they come off as a platonic friend or a robot. The woman doesn't think ''oh, this guy likes me but he isn't showing it because he is afraid of rejection,'' she thinks ''oh, a guy who wants to talk to me but doesn't want to get in my pants teeehee, what a nice guy friend''

>>220940080
Jews took every tactic in the book from women. Judaism itself is a matriarchal ideology. Hence why you’re only an actual Stein if your mother is a Jew. We don’t enjoy Eden because a dumb bitch listened to a snake.

>>220942520
>The reason why women friendzone men isn't because they don't want to "ruin the relationship" by dating them. It's because deep down they know that the dude's only reason for friendship is because he deludes himself that eventually he can earn her heart.

But that's the problem, instead of letting these guys go, she'll keep them around KNOWING they want this, knowing they want her, but she doesn't want to be mean, or lose a friend, or whatever the fuck. All to avoid having to step into a male role and say no from the jump. I know woman are daft, lets be real, but can we also admit that women aren't so dumb that they cant tell when a guy wants to fuck? Women are literally the keepers of sex, that often means they ALLOW you to fuck them which means on some level they know you WANT to fuck them. No woman is so clueless that she cant see when a guy is going up and beyond because he wants something, hell I'm a fucking man and I can easily tell when someone is trying to pull something but being overly friendly or available.

>>220939752
Are you shadowbanned or are just you being ignored? Niggas on here pretend to ignore me all the time it don't mean I'm shadowbanned, just bitches are too scared to clap back.

>>220942597
>knowing they want her, but she doesn't want to be mean, or lose a friend, or whatever the fuck
Again, you aren't getting my point which agrees with your last sentence.
Women don't actually believe this. They KNOW that the poor friendzoned retard is dreaming of fucking them every day. But they are already getting all the attention and care from the dude while deluding the guy into thinking that this moment will eventually come (never).
If anything, getting pity sex in this scenario is extremely dangerous for the man. The woman who friendzoned him might feel like the pity sex was under duress and could start claiming that she was raped.

>>220942597
Men are logical about a majority of things except relationships & love towards a woman. Women are retarded & illogical about almost everything besides relationships & “love” a man sends her. If a woman keeps a guy in the friendzone while having a boyfriend she’s either keeping him as a plan B or having him as an unofficial voice to enable her shitty behavior in a relationship knowing he’ll kiss her ass & tell her that her boyfriend is being toxic or whatever. There was some stat recently that said some upward of 50% of women do have a backup plan ready in case their relationship fails. They know not to put all their eggs in one basket.

>>220942641
>But they are already getting all the attention and care from the dude while deluding the guy into thinking that this moment will eventually come

I guess that's the part i'll never get. I'm a guy, if I dont want to deal with someone, especially fuck them, then I cut em loose. Goodbye. So I dont get why women gives themselves risks or even drama by keeping these guys on a string and watching him slowly unravel until she finally just pulls the pin and says no thanks.

>>220941737
>>220941981
>>220942511
Just saying, but ai sexbots aren’t gonna treat you like this.

western women are so unbelievably fucked in the head, genuinely just complete pieces of shit
>you deserve to be lonely because I refuse to block the guy who I claimed raped me
like imagine how fucking retarded you have to be to even justify some shit like that
they're such vile pieces of shit, can't wait until incels become a majority of the male population because it will absolutely happen if this keeps up and they keep acting like fucking cunts

>>220942663
I got a surge of blackpill running into my body reading that text of the two foids that got posted where one wanted to date a pro athlete & her friend went over rules & almost all of them are things you see women seething nonstop about in any other scenario.
>let him cheat on you if he wants
>cook & clean for him
>never complain
They could do ANY of these things for an average guy. They just choose to be cunts because they want to be.

>>220942663
Oh I'm well aware, that's why I avoid any woman with male "friends" like the plague now. My ex had one that I honestly should of seen the signs with but I was too stupid in my love. Never found out if she was cheating or did like him, but I wasn't sticking around to find out

>>220942727
Yeah I heard women only follow those 3 rules if the guy is just killing it in life, anything less? Pfft good luck faggot

File: IMG_1725.jpg (511 KB, 1170x2075)

511 KB JPG

>>220942726
> they're such vile pieces of shit, can't wait until incels become a majority of the male population because it will absolutely happen if this keeps up and they keep acting like fucking cunts
I despise them but I hardly think they acted alone in a vacuum. They did have enablers after all.

Blackpill rethoric aside, isn't it weird that its core themes are becoming so mainstream? Don't get me wrong I still cringe at the thought of anyone using the words "incel" or "foid" in the real world, but all of this reaching normies feels insane, like a pandora's box of some kind. Normal everyday people are not suppose to know this, specially women. It's like showing a kid a cartel beheading video

File: 1774814835350340.webm (667 KB, 378x360)

667 KB WEBM

>>220940080

I think most women are fine, but the ones online, they are all vile. Of course if you spend your time online you will hate women. I can't really think of women online who are good people outside of some youtube channels where women only upload their hobby stuff and don't interact with the internet outside of uploading videos.
Only terrible women go online and their behavior only gets worse with more exposure.

Most women I've known have never given a shit about the internet and they are just normal. I have nothing bad to say about them.
I wasted my youth and didn't secure a nice loyal girlfriend because talking to women in my school and in my town was weird. I had girls begging for my attention and instead I went online and had long distance relationships and those women were fucking crazy. They made me depressed and made me hate women. Online women are fucking scum.

>>220942815
It was completely astroturfed. The whole incel thing was created by Steven Bannon and Peter Thiel.
I remember the day 4chan got flooded with the word ''incel.'' No one had ever used this word and then they just started pushing it.

>>220942700
>I dont get why women gives themselves risks or even drama by keeping these guys on a string
Because women will never experience true companionship. Have you ever heard women talk about friendship? It's miserable. I can't recall how many times I've been told by women how they are jealous of male friendships.
The only way women will ever experience platonic relationships is with men, because the man will carry the entire relationship. But the only way they can do that is through friendzones, because no man would ever put the effort to do so unless he's romantically inclined.

there's plenty of women in my life who I love and would die for but in my heart of hearts I still dont think they should be able to vote or site beside men socially, they're just different creatures

and there's nothing wrong with that

>>220942844
are you retarded
r9k has been spamming the word incel since like 2015, probably earlier

>>220942834
>not all women,
Yess all women

>>220942834
>I think most women are fine, but the ones online, they are all vile

ok but they are all online though

>>220939610
>>220941669
>>220941878
>>220940477
>>220942461
>>220942726
have I been putting pussy on a pedestal for too long? all this shit sounds miserable. everything sounds so miserable and performative, no sincerity or even attempts at genuine love. even if I wanted kids, modern women aren’t good enough to be mothers let alone partners. how the fuck did I dupe myself into wanting this shit?

>>220942844
That's a lie and you would know this if you ever browsed /fit/ or /r9k/ in the early 2010's.
The issue is that women don't understand words and added incel to their vocabulary as another way to mock low value men.
They simply are unaware that low value men are the entire reason why women currently are the most privileged and coddled group that has ever existed in the history of mankind.
Incels are slowly waking up to the fact that the current society is actively working against them and telling them that they aren't needed. Women are deluding themselevs towards the fact that they are also low value in the grand scheme of things.
If you've ever seen looksmatching posts, you would see immeasurable levels of seething from women, because thanks to social media, they have an extreme overvalued sense of self from men that only look for easy lay.
This explains their entire hysteria. And I'm 100% sure that we're going to see mass suicide events from women within the next decade.

>>220942884
I wouldn't say become so jaded that you swear off women forever, you should always have a pocket of love just in case, but overall yeah. Welcome to the club. We were all psyop'd into thinking just being you loving your woman was enough, nope, not even remotely close. The last generation that had real love were most likely the boomers. We never had a chance in hell after the internet.

>>220942862
Why would he care about that when his purpose is reshaping the culture here though

>>220942874
They are not. You only think that because you live online and the women online often have dozens of accounts and often they aren't women at all, just ragebait accounts or trannies. The majority of women I personally know have no online presence. Not even a facebook account. Some have a facebook account that hasn't been used in over 10 years. Many only have accounts that they need for work stuff.

>>220942844
>>220942862
Half and half. It was definitely boosted up. The phenomenon is real, but certain trends like looksmaxxing were boosted by Thiel. The mainstream right like Bannon never had any serious intentions about solving the issue.

>>220942913
Tranny coping. I just checked the archives for /fit/ and the word ''incel'' was used 55 times in the entire year of 2013
80 times in 2014
108 times in 2015
it only starts being used when Steven Bannon and Peter Thiel get influence
455 times in 2016
2573 times in 2017
9629 times in 2018

The term was completely astroturfed by jewish freaks and fed mouthpieces like Nick Fuentes

>>220942931
I don't buy into the conspiracy that it's boosted by anyone. 4chan has been steadily leaking into normie culture more and more every year since like 2014 due to people reposting 4chan screenshots on twitter/instagram/reddit for likes, and then normies adopt the lingo. It escalated post-covid just like everything else internet related.

>>220942931
Bannon's entire thing was that he wanted to be like his buddy Peter Thiel and present himself as some master manipulator. He is more interested in you thinking he has some plan than having a plan.
This guy used to shit up the entire site praising himself and portraying himself as some Qanon puppetmaster.

>>220942884
Ignore >>220942923. The psyop goes much deeper than that anon, you were told your life didn’t matter if you’re a virgin or didn’t have the approval of roasties. You are completely correct in your assessment. Swear them off if you have to, don’t participate in a worthless shitty system that hurt people like you. You don’t owe anything to it.

>>220942844
That's retarded though. Peter Thiel surrounds himself with the sort of people who want to drive up the birth rate in the US. Looksmaxxing isn't the same as incel ideology, it can be grouped in with self improvement, and it increases the odds of women giving a man attention. Leading to fucking and potential accidents/consumers. Same thing with the tradcath meme. Inceldom does the opposite. Only somebody who wants to push a more female positive outlook on 4chan would claim otherwise. Someone with the same goals as Thiel and his cronies ironically. There is no better way to fight billionaires than to spite women and deny them consumers unironically.

File: 1732779414012134.jpg (407 KB, 856x1426)

407 KB JPG

is 4chan really so politically relevant that it needs to be astroturfed? are political groups fighting proxy wars here?

>>220939610
women will never win, but we don't love them for winning anyway.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/whPSRYp6Zaa3

>>220942978
on r9k it was used 372 times in 2013, 660 times in 2014, and 1606 times in 2015. If you're going to blame anything, blame it leaking out from r9k at a steady rate

>>220943030
Bigger board, trooner. /fit/ is tiny.

>>220943035
no shit dumbass, that's why I said it leaked out from r9k. Go ahead and expose yourself as not being around in 2014/15 if you think /fit/ wasn't becoming infested with r9k types at the time.

>>220942978
Being astroturfed by the alt-right (another astroturfed term) or not, incel wasn't created by those two. It's a fact that it started in /r9k/.
I went to highschool with a guy who was literally an incel and this was like 15 years ago. He browsed /r9k/ unironically and had crippling fear towards women.
The weirdest part is that he was actually quite handsome and a very talented musician. Some friends thought he was gay in denial but he was just extremely autistic around women.
It's kind of funny because he would literally go "gas the kikes racewar now" or say nigger in front of women (in very liberal groups) but because he was handsome, they just thought he was weird.

>>220943022
leftists propaganda is so irrelevant that california is going red. they fail not only on 4chan, literally everywhere. no one cares about their shit anymore

>>220942989
4chan is literally owned by the feds. Before a psyop is fed to the mainstream internet they test it here.
It doesn't leak into the rest of the internet. They do test runs here and then if they like the response they put it on the rest of the internet.
You will see a coordinated narrative or term being pushed here for a week and everyone calls it stupid and calls the OP a fed and it dies out but others stick even when it's obvious it's a psyop and then it gets spread everywhere.

>>220943014
Peter Thiel is an antiwhite freak and a homosexual. His goal is killing white birth rates and creating a social class of boys who get him off by doing plastic surgery and pleasing his bimbofication fetish. These looksmaxxers are used for gay sex, made sterile and Peter Thiel uses them as a propaganda tool to spread fear about how the internet is a bad place and we need mass surveillance and zero anonymity online to prevent kids falling for incel looksmaxxer ideologies. He funds the incel shit and he sells you a solution.

>>220943052
>California going red
It isn't, but the fact that the two frontrunner for governor and mayor aren't both dems this time could signal an underperformance were it to be compared to 2018. Senate's off the table for sure though.

>>220939610
twitter is the most botted shit on the internet, no shot that tweet got even a quarter of the likes in reality. still pretty funny though

>>220943045
Tranny pedophile trying to shame people for not using /r9k/ the cuckold porn board

>>220943012
Well im not a virgin so I guess I'm exempt for going down the yellow brick tard road of hating all women forever. Fuck women, but im not out here with a loudspeaker dude, just like a dog or a cat or bird. I treat them as what they are. Trying to hold them to a male standard and then seething is how you got faggot boards like/r9k/

>>220943094
you have literally 0 reading comprehension, because i was referring to /fit/ and not r9k. retard.

>>220943035
Everything about looksmaxxing was already said on /fit/ and bodybuilding forums more than a decade ago.
It got turned into "the manosphere" which is quite literally Thiel acting as a sugar daddy for a bunch of retards but that doesn't mean that the ideas were inorganic. They were just adapted and weaponized for a non-autistic audience.
It's simple Hegelian dialectics where the Paypal mafia synthesizes concepts that are actually beneficial for young men while boxing them into a easily manipulated community.

>>220943108
You lost, trooner. Join the 50%

>>220940477
>The point is that they weren't raped by the individuals

Nah, women are so fucked up, don't put it past them to stay in social contact with their literal rapist. Might not be common, but I guarantee you it happens.

File: Who Wants To Tell Him?.png (1.69 MB, 1600x900)

1.69 MB PNG

>>220942726
>become a majority of the male population

>>220943109
Nothing organic about it. Before the incel term was astroturfed there were just virgins. It as just completely different people who couldn't get laid.
The incel psyop turns being a virgin into a lifestyle and gives you an entire ideology and a whole personality crafted for you to adopt, the entire Peter Thiel rulebook spelled out for you to make you as repulsive as possible on purpose to turn you into a boogeyman just because you can't get laid.
Because you've never had sex this guy swoops in and gives you a list of things you have to obey and how you need to act to be a ''truecel.'' Basically grooming you into being a terrorist or the next school shooter just because you can't get laid. The entire thing designed to make it so that you will never get laid.

>>220943095
I hold them to a decent human standard and they manage to fail even that

>>220941669
>saved
well, ill try to keep that in mind the next time i meet a woman...

>>220942296
Lmao, OK, sure thing, dude.

>>220939667
>>220940876
Musk does an ANUAL Chrismas talk about how much he loves jeets more than people rant. Like he's done this for multiple Christmases in a row. Like it's always specifically over Christmas Eve/Christmas Day. idk what the fuck goes on at the Musk house on Christmas that he's like
>gotta tweet about how much I love jeets
>>220942311
>>220942296
I got banned for "platform manipulation" for saying assplay sucks at wrestling and that gAyEW is gay

>>220942445
>saves AI pic
>didn't use AI to remove the watermark

>>220940272
they weren't raped. they were leading "chad" on and then regretted it later. I know multiple girls who "were totally raped, but like I'd never report it man"

>>220939667
Inauthentic behavior, right? The consensus seems to be that it's because of ublock.

>>220940981
>girl intentionally leads guy on
>guy is good looking
>guy assumes she wants sex
>guy begins to initiate sex
>oy vey I was raped
>women are biologically programmed to want to get raped, it's 100% a thing, it's why they seek out "bad boys", it's why a rape fetish is like the number 1 female fetish, it's why girls seek out interracial relationships/like immigrants and refugees. Think of all the women who have ever lived, back in like fucking neolithic times most babies had to be made via rape. Like only 1 in 20 guys reproduced but most women reproduced. women were allowed to travel freely but men were ritualistically killed on site. I think the only period in time where a lower percent of men had kids was president day. there are mass fucking graves outside of neolithic cities(? settlements?) where there are just piles and piles of bones of bodies that were brutally killed, fucking eaten and then their bones and shit were used in rituals but breeding aged women/girl skeletons aren't in the pit cause they got raped

>>220943256
that happened to me and I am using ublock
but it only happened like 24ish hours ago after pretty constant use

>>220940272
Any time that a woman complains about a man — and I mean ANY time — it’s because she gave her time or body to a man in the past and regretted it.

>>220943157
do you really the fed/billionaires are that clever/sophisticated to from the ground-up astroturf something? you have too much faith in their abilities i think, realistically it's more likely like the other anon said, the beginning was organic and then was later hijacked for other purposes

>>220940981
Retards say it's about some specific example or how they like to get raped or how they lied about rape.
The real reason it upsets them is because you dared to criticize a woman's choice. It's not that she isn't blocking a guy who ''raped'' her. It's that you even brought it up. The women mad at it are not all women who were raped in 2022. It's women inserting whatever they relate to in the scenario, and you are asking mocking them for doing something irrational.
The tweet may as well be shit like
>the face your girlfriend makes when you ask her why she needs 10 different shoes
>the face your girlfriend makes when you tell her to drink less
The text doesn't matter. The response would be the same and what makes it sting is that it's a screenshot from a movie all of them saw. The response is ''why the fuck are you questioning me you fucking sexist pig REEEE'' because if a woman wants to talk to her rapist then she should be able to.

>>220942884
>have I been putting pussy on a pedestal for too long?
probably
women have the same amount of weirdo emotional and psychology problems as men, but they're just different and worse
men are more straightforward in dealing with childhood traumas big and small, women are not

>>220943346
What? No.
The reason why women are seething over this is because it proves that their need for attention is immeasurably higher than their stance on sexual power dynamics.

File: match.png (1.08 MB, 1310x1946)

1.08 MB PNG

>>220943309
I actually got "unsuspended" a few days ago, turned off all the adblock and twitter-related extensions I had, followed an account, and got immediately suspended again. I asked grok what the fuck is wrong with x and it told me not to like, follow, or basically make any interaction on x for 48 hours because "the backend hasn't synced up yet" or some contrived shit. I'm currently waiting for my second appeal to go through and as a coomer that went through saving porn from my x following list DAILY, this shit makes me want to minecraft that kike Nikita so bad right now.

>>220943319
There is nothing clever or sophisticated about it. It's not ''the billionaires,'' it's Peter Thiel who has billions of dollars and he talks openly about half of this shit and doesn't even care if people find out that he is paying for Clavicular's medical bills and bailing him out of jail.
You have an insanely rich, powerful and neurotic jewish man.
This is a guy who developed AI systems for Israel called ''where's daddy,'' a program that was designed to maximize civilian deaths in Gaza and ''accidentally'' take out the entire family of anyone deemed a terrorist. A program that tracks their every movement so you can strike someone when they are with their family. Just look this shit up and then tell me that this guy isn't so insane that he would never astroturf incel ideologies (even though he openly funds them)

>>220943366
yes, but also they'd literally get just as mad if you told them astrology isn't real or that they didn't actually see a ghost when they were 14, because ghosts aren't real

>>220943366
t. low IQ
The entire issue is that you just questioned them. These women do not want you questioning any of their choices. If she wants to talk to her rapist she should be able to, if she wants to get an abortion she should be able to, if she wants to go to India for vacation and get raped and killed it's her choice.
You bringing attention to it and making her feel judged is the issue. The idea that every woman who is seething has a rapist on her speed dial is retarded. You don't even get why they are mad.
Women who have never been raped or ''raped'' are still mad because you mock women for making their own choices.

>>220943440
Why did you sign your post calling by yourself low IQ?

>>220943467
ESL

File: images.jpg (10 KB, 235x215)

10 KB JPG

>Why did you sign your post calling by yourself low IQ?

File: 17641294941.jpg (124 KB, 656x840)

124 KB JPG

>>220941669
When will they learn

>>220943478
Why did you sign your post by calling* yourself low IQ?

>>220942844
>>220942931
>>220942998
>leftists spread something
>"DUDE ACTUALLY IT'S A RIGHTWING CONSPIRACY. MUH BANNON. MUH THIEL"

You people are beyond parody.

>>220943595
Neither are right wing, subhuman retard.
>DUDE BEING RIGHT WING MEANS BEING A ZIONIST AND SUPPORTING WHITE GENOCIDE, I AM SO SMART!!! BANNON WAS WITH ANTI-WHITE ZIONIST LEFTIST TRUMP, THAT MEANS HE IS RIGHT WING

>>220942931
>thiel thiel thiel
your a parody of yourself, nobody talked about thiel until 2 years ago, also a boosted psyop.

>>220943606
>right/left
those are relative terms with no fixed meaning you know

>>220942409
They're not bi
They just say they are for male attention

>>220943612
There were people warning about Peter Thiel for many years on 4chan. They were mostly ignored and now we know it was all true. He was all over Epstein files, shown to be heavily involved in 4chan, funded all the shit, was hugely involved in Israel's wars giving them tech and funding, is the main guy behind online censorship, funded Andrew Tate, funded Nick Fuentes, heavily involved in funding reddit and censoring it. His Palentir shit is the main thing used when they go after 4chan posters.

>>220942559
Technically speaking, eve listening to that cunt snake wasn't the fall. God never told her not to eat from that tree (he knew it would be pointless to tell her because he knew the nature of women immediately)
The fall happened when adam failed the test by listening to her. He was the only one commanded not to eat the fruit of knowledge of good and evil

>>220943687
I don't know or care who peter thiel is, this is a thread about making fun of women's dog-brains
take this shit elsewhere

>>220943702
Ok, Steingoldberg. We won't talk about Peter Thiel in the thread about Peter Thiel astroturfed psyops. I am getting sleepy.

>>220943717
>the thread about
women being dumb

File: c1a75532-2805-4035-8675-3(...).png (1007 KB, 1440x2048)

1007 KB PNG

>>220941669

>>220943022
Well they don't have a direct competitor, everything that could be conquered was conquered (academia, media, art, business culture, mainstream opinion) but because their movement is inherently an anti-thesis they cannot exist without an enemy, so they will seek it and if nobody exists anymore they will manufacture the enemy themselves. Right now the biggest enemy of the whole "right side of history" movement is anonymous posts on a forum with low to medium posting speed.

>>220943687
which board exactly were anons warning about peter thiel on? because between 2014 and 2018 /fit/ said his name 12 times total.

>>220941669
didn't read

>>220943763
I saw it a lot in Sam Hyde threads with people saying Peter Thiel funds Sam Hyde and they work with Roger Stone. They were right.

>>220942187
Were the people ITT not aware this was the case? No shit her """rapist""" isn't an ACTUAL rapist that jumped her with a ski-mask on and a knife in his hand outside of a bus-stop.

>>220943717
>won't talk about Peter Thiel in the thread about Peter Thiel
It's not. It's a thread about a retarded feminist reaction to a recent movie.
You just desperately WANT it to be about your conspiritard boogeyman.

>>220943803
between the years 2014 and 2022, /fit/ + /r9k/ did not say the words sam hyde and peter thiel at the same time once.
between the years 2014 and 2022, /pol/ used the words sam hyde and peter thiel at the same time 3 times, none of which are about being funded.
this means no one between 2014 and 2022 on this site on any of the relevant boards said the sentence 'sam hyde is funded by peter thiel' or any variant at all.
so again, when were anons warning about peter thiel on this site? this is just a conspiracy that cooked up in the last like year.

>>220943880
Tranny freak grabbing at straws.

File: retards.jpg (91 KB, 1822x199)

91 KB JPG

>>220943880
>>220943935
actually i'm 100% correct, this has entirely happened in the last year. fucking moron. keep crying, nobody cared about peter thiel until literally the last year

>>220939610
Women aren't blamed for enough things

>>220943880
/tv/ archives
2022
>Notice how since Peter Thiel started supporting the GOP /pol/ has been psyoped against trannies instead of staying against gays and all faggots like they've always been?
>Since Peter Thiel infiltrated the american GOP and started funding literal who's to push the international right to the left, /pol/ and right wing journals have coincidentally seen a surge of purely tranny obsession and a decline of general anti-fag content.
2021
>Jeffrey epstein? Peter Thiel at the Lincoln project? Matt gaetz is accused of pimping teenage girls to RNC bosses. Those are 3 examples in the news right now. Human trafficking is the number one criminal enterprise in the world, more than drugs and guns COMBINED. Take a single class on human trafficking at a fucking community College. See how quickly you start sounding like Q.
>are sam hyde peter thiel still together
2018
>This guy is literally a paid shill working on behalf of Peter Thiel trying to subvert the "intellectual dark web" in the interest of elite capital and to undermine free expression.
>Reminder that Musk is a secret repub. Reminder that his friend Peter Thiel is literally a closet neoreactionary who is best friends with and the employer of the de-facto founder of Neoreaction.
>Peter Thiel needs to stop fellating moldbug and fund the next few seasons of World Peace
2020
>notice how sam dropped being so pro trump when peter thiel stopped as well
>Amazing how he could go from Katrina Kanye to Trump Kanye. Its almost like he was targeted for reprogramming by Peter Thiel.
2024
>Sam also strongly suggested that he sold out to Peter Thiel (homosexual lolbertarian tech billionaire) a few months ago.

File: 1762696851723533.png (1.43 MB, 1024x1024)

1.43 MB PNG

>>220941669
just be stoic and uncaring and then fuck her
what's so difficult?
oh yeah, you need to be tall and good looking
sorry

File: fffa.jpg (112 KB, 1744x368)

112 KB JPG

>>220944048
literally the first post I searched for in yours was the 2018 one, and it's not even about sam hyde
nice lying

So this movie is woke right? its bascially a "man bad" kind of thing right?

>>220943595
>>220943612
I said half and half because Thiel does have direct ties to the current looksmaxxing wave due to Clavicular. Steve Bannon himself admitted to taking advantage of lonely men. That’s one half. The other half is the phenomenon is real. Incels did not emerge inorganically. They are the result of the current system’s failings that are gonna emerge with or without Bannon/Thiel. I’m not taking away this site’s very major contributions. It’s more accurate to say the movement is a real organic thing, but it has been hijacked by bad people. Look at what adpocalypse did to major creators early on. The foundation is real and liberals who say
>DURRRR DID EPSTEIN GIVE THOSE VIEWS TO YOU
are short sighted and idiotic. We are all men who got wronged by the system here. We don’t need to resort to bad faith readings here, especially when we’re probably closer in beliefs than you’d think.

File: 1777453612698206.png (209 KB, 735x714)

209 KB PNG

>>220939610
Saw this with my gf, we were laughing hysterically, some other guys in the theater were keking hard. I really think it's the toxic foids that are getting assblasted over this movie.

>>220944110
not really. you can read it in a twitter feminist way if you want but the film itself isn't like that.

>>220944307
it's mostly incels who are fuming about it. at least, release week was mostly this site fuming until retarded feminists started responding

>>220944332
>release week was mostly this site fuming
no, tranny
it was autistic people picking apart the logic of the wish because it made no sense

>>220941997
>Fuck incels.
Yes, please. Gimme puss puss.

>>220942923
I think I'd say millenials had the last shot at it depending on if you're one of the older/middle ones or not. Dating now is a modern hellscape but seems like it amplified in how horrible it was in the last 10-15 years or so.

I remember my buddy in college trying online dating back around 2010-2011 or so and it was just starting to get bad, I lucked out and met my girl before that in person and been together ever since.

>>220944085
Tranny pedophile having a meltie
No one said that post was about Sam Hyde

File: Jeet jannies.jpg (34 KB, 775x203)

34 KB JPG

>>220939667
>>220939752
I got banned on 4chan for shitting on jeets several times.

File: 1743894323132882.jpg (36 KB, 512x512)

36 KB JPG

>men somehow shocked when we can't completely cut out an important part of our lives
You're all so utterly blinded by bitterness that it's tiresome.

>>220944477
that just depends on which tranny is monitoring the reported posts at any given time

>>220944501
>we can't completely cut out an important part of our lives
which is...

>>220944501
you're not a woman

>>220944518
I believe it is. The pic rel leaves me no doubt. But foids would also be more careful saying "you" unless 'she' actually wants to reveal 'her'self as a femoid.

I have never known a woman who did this it sounds like a lot of you need to stop giving these people attention.

>>220944534
it's just a trooncel

>>220944453
>If you don't believe Peter Thiel single-handedly started the incel craze on the internet you're a tranny pedophile despite the evidence that /r9k/ was posting it thousands of times for years and people have been posting 4chan screenshots on every site repeatedly over the last decade.
You're right, it was totally Peter Thiel the evil boogeyman. Got it.
You argue like a stereotypical woman. Kill yourself.

>>220944332
>it's mostly incels who are fuming about it.
Over WHAT, nigger? I've seen none of what you're claiming people on here were doing.

>>220944536
>I have never known a woman who did this
OK? Maybe it wasn't someone they've known personally, or maybe it wasn't the EXACT same situation, but this kind of behavior/mentality has been observed in enough modern women that both men AND women instantly recognized the kind of mentality it's talking about.

>it sounds like a lot of you need to stop giving these people attention
Why? Because they make women look bad? Yeah, I bet you wish we'd "give them less attention"...

>>220944799
I mean don’t give the women that kind of attention. Your problems are partly of your own design.

>>220944536
>but i know a tall asian

>>220940477
>Denying them the power to fuck with the truth like that for their own benefit is kryptonite to a lot of women.
Objectivity is just a totally foreign concept to them. They believe their subjective experience is the same thing as the truth. If they feel like it was rape now, then it’s rape. If they change their mind in 2 years then it wasn’t rape. They create their own reality ad hoc to best suit whatever set of circumstances present themselves from moment to moment and it shifts depending on her interests, and who she is relating to in the conversation or who she is trying to distance herself from.
By denying “her truth” you’re not allowing her to use this free flowing web of subjective experience to capture or ostracize her intended targets. A woman is always trying to either envelop or ostracize everyone else in her social circle. Inclusion/exclusion is the name of the game. These ideas about “what really happened” have nothing to do with anything.

>>220944950
You are confusing providing a contradictory example to an easily provable average statistic with questioning how often someone encounters a specific behavior without seeking it out.
I don’t stick my dick in crazy.

>>220944968
i don't think you stick your dick in anything if you haven't noticed the relationship modern women have with "rape," "trauma" and so on as aspirational fantasies. it has nothing to do with any individual woman being "crazy," it's mainstream culture they all participate in to varying degrees. you're just coping.

>>220944307
>my gf
Be gone, normalfag

we used to have a meme word for this, it was "humblebrag." a guy version would be something like "i'm so tired from having to fuck all those hot girls with my giant dick." when women babble about being raped, about how "creeps" won't leave them alone at the gym or on the bus, they're just bragging about being desirable. there was no actual rape.

>>220942605
you are shadowbanned only i and others can see you !