They were so reatrded to think anyone under the age of 35 or 40 would care about He-Man?
>>221020140
>>221023913more like under 50
>>221023913As a 35 year old, I only really know He-man through Robot Chicken and the Hey Yeah meme
>>221023913I watched the cartoon thst aired in the early 2000s.
I’m an elder zoomer and I would have seen it if it had hotter babes and wasn’t 2.5 hours long
>>221024023you have to be 50+ to have seen this shit or care about it
if I'm a man it's just embarrassing to go see the "shirtless blond man movie" where everyone wears leather.I can't justify it with my friends.>...but you see it's really about TOYS!>...but you see it was originally a CARTOON!like I have no retort or justification if someone just calls it "that gay movie", I can't even say in good faith that it's very masculine, it's too campy
>>221023913He man the show wasnt even that big. They just made really cool toys.
>>221023913I personally saw the 2002 cartoon as a kid, which I remember liking. However, it disappeared from TV very quickly and I never felt like checking it out any further."Dude with magic swords fights buff skeleton wizard" is actually a premise that could work, but I don't think this plastic Marvel-ish nostalgiabait method was the way to go about it (especially since absolutely NOBODY fucking cares about He-Man, not even the 49 year olds who actually saw the original cartoon and had the original toys).Is it true that the very, very small group of actual hardcore He-Man fans prefer the 2002 version? Are there any other manchild IPs where a reboot is considered the superior version?
>>221023913I think they were hopping the 5 to 12 year-old boy demographic would get into it and start buying action figures again.>And GenX dudes born in 1979 would take their grandkids, I guess?He-Man wasn't really that popular in the 80s. It had like 5 years of popularity. Not even GenX is nostalgic about He-Man.
>>221024570Why are you this insecure?
>>221023913I'm 35 and I've never watched fucking He-Man.
>>221024570camp isn't really accepted at all by modern film audiences, which is honestly a shame. if anyone ITT can think of camp successes I'd love to be proven wrong.
>>221023913>>221025396>>221025451the movie only makes sense as something bankrolled by Jeff Bezos. the fact that it had zero chance of making its money back doesn't seem to be an issue for that guy.
In europe og He-Man cartoons were running into early 90sI’m 37 btw
>>221025478Ooof, I had no idea this was an Amazon movie.
>>221025396He man filled the gap between star wars and TMNT. Come to think of it GI Joe was way more popular and they toys were cheaper
>>221023913They made a movie about the "HEYYY WHATS GOIN ON" meme?
>>221025396>Not even GenX is nostalgic about He-Man.well i am 50 and never liked he man
>>221024570lmao, what a fucking faggot
>>221023913Firstly MOTU is supposed to be for children, but instead kids are now glued to phones watching brain rot shit instead of any story-based entertainment, so the market has been cut out from under any films aimed at a younger audience, especially because kids don't play with toys anymore either (seriously anyone under the age of 15 now is completely fucked).Secondly, this is the kinda film that if it didn't do well in cinemas would do really well on DVD and make its money that way, but all these dipshit companies decided to totally fuck over the home media market in favour of their stupid fucking streaming model which is now collapsing on itself.
>>221024570Bro, who gives a shit what other people think? Do you want to see it or not? Don’t live your life scared of what other people think
>hurr this movie was never gonna work because the property is too old/obscure for normal people to care aboutIf that were necessarily true then Marvel would never have taken off. Before 2008 Iron Man was about as well known among the general, non-comic reading public as He-Man is. But the movie was good and well marketed so it succeeded. This one wasn't, so it didn't. Simple as.
>>221023913GOTG was from 1969. How the fuck was that successful?
>>221026285Millennial writing. Retards love it.
I'm over 35 and still don't care.
>>221026285>How the fuck was that successful?Avengers. That movie was a colossal success and fully established the overarching storyline between all the Marvel films which lead to normalfags going to see every single one of those films and making them all successful.
>>221026285Gunn's GOTG was heavily based on the 2008-2011 run by Abnett & Lanning tho
>>221026285guardians of the galaxy was effectively a "new" ip sold on its own strength and the marvel logo, there was no expectation that anyone in the audience would know about the obscure comic. it's not a nostalgia cash-in like motu.
>>221026123It's truly a shame that home video sales are not a thing anymore. Streaming fucked everything up hardcore.
>>221023913NIGGAS THINK THEY HE-MEN, POW POW, THE END
>>221026553>The May 2008 sales estimate for the first issue was 39,854 copiesit's cute how you think this sort of thing impacts anything at all
>>221024570>it's just embarrassing to go see the "shirtless blond man movie" where everyone wears leather.Is this an American phenomenon?I never once in my 30 years had that thought and only knew about it through Darksydephil's WWE gacha addiction, where people were confused at him for loving "sweaty oily men wrestling" and going so far and say that WWE is for gay insecure men... like wtf is wrong with you Mutts
>>221023913I really hope this means 80s nostalgia slop is finally dying
>>221026646I didn't say it was successful
>>221025396All toys had a 5-8 year lifespan back then. It constantly amazes me that Pokemon,Minecraft & Fortnite just keep going on and on and on nowadays.
>>221025390I should have been the target audience, but I'm not going to watch a marvelized self deprecating quipfest with blackwashes, no matter what
>>221025396It was insanely popular in its days. It's the idea that something has to endure generations that it's perverse.
>>221027242Transformers and TMNT are really the only of these 80's franchises that have managed to stay popular and relevant throughout the years. He-Man is similar to many other series like Thundercats,Voltron,Robotech that were very popular back then but have basically been forgotten by younger generations
>>221025339The show originated from the toys and the toys originated from excess toy parts they wanted to create franchise from
>>221027486>Transformers and TMNT are really the only of these 80's franchises that have managed to stay popular and relevant throughout the years.Cars and robots are timeless cool shit for boys (except noways since kids don't play with toys anymore) TMNT maintained their visibility through the decades, with games and comics>He-Man is similar to many other series like Thundercats,Voltron,Robotech that were very popular back then but have basically been forgotten by younger generationsAnd that's a natural thing. Undead IPs are a modern forced thing. In case of he-man they tried every decade to make half assed attempt to revive it and it never worked. And to be fair, with the exception of the 2002 reboot, all those attempts either tried to reinvent the wheel or were made with malice (like Shit-Ra or Kevin Smiths crap). It is what it it. I personally think that the concept is great, the main characters are great and loved the look and tone of the filmation cartoon. I have no problem at all with all these IPs being left in the past, what pains me is them being dragged out from their grave, raped, mogged and worn like skinsuits.Let that stuff die already
>>221023913Maybe but I really loved it. Skeletor was great and I like the idea of a cosmic evil space wizard with a skull head fighting an Aryan barbarian man of good in the center of the universe. The film had a great message and the fight scenes were good. I'm a fan now
>>221026202Bingo. Iron Man also didn’t come across as embarrassed of its own premise like this movie is, making fun of the characters and universe at every turn.
>>221028098This is the root problem here: TAKE THE PREMISE SERIOUSLY. It’s fine to acknowledge the goofy elements, but you’re just spitting in the face of the fans who do care about this thing. Stop constantly having the characters cracking jokes and telling the audience that this thing they like sucks.
>>221028162This type of Thor Ragnarok and GotG style self referential humor has been absolutely disastrous. It needs to be fully dead and buried.
>35>or 40
>>221023913I was told this movie wasn't for chuds
seems like a decent kids' movie (like SW isn't currently), and it's a shame it's not doing better.Why do they never actually put "He Man" in the titles of these things?
>>221028214The marketing for this movie was a fucking dumpster fire. The movie itself is mocking modern woke corporate speak, but the trailers in no way conveyed that.
>>221023913>boomers are fucking retardedyes? are you honestly surprised?
The plot of this movie would make so much more sense if Adam had amnesia after landing on earth, similar to the plot of Hook. But no, he’s fully aware that he’s the prince of Eternia and still acts like a total pussy. Makes no sense when he knows it’s all real.
>>221026123Another point: it seems like modern parents really took the whole "violent media is making the kids kill each other" stuff to heart, and now kids literally only watch cutesy animated Minions style movies until they're basically adults.I don't know if it's just people in my immediate circle, but these kids are not watching action and adventure movies like we used to. They'e not watching anything with swords, guns, pirates, spies, killer robots, etc.
>>221028233go anti-woke go broke
>>221028342Excellent point. Animated films, including Pixar themselves have really gotten dumbed down. We’ll probably never see something as classy and sophisticated as Ratatouille ever again.
>>221028162Personally I didn't really see it as "actually this thing sucks". They goof on the names a bit but all the Eternian heroes and villains are treated as respectable heroes and actual threats. I was honestly expecting more "errrmm, that guy's neck extends...ooookkkk" kind of shit and I'm glad that Adam genuinely looks up to them and respects them.
>>221028396imo the comedic elements are by far the most disastrous part of the movie. I’m sure there were like a dozen punch up writers that worked on the script, and one of them clearly thought Fisto was the funniest thing ever seeing as they repeat that same joke at least five times.
>>221026285Peak capeshit days, today GOTG would bomb
>>221028525James Gunn’s writing felt fresh and funny back in 2015. Those types of jokes in MotU now feel like a lazy copy of a copy of a copy.
>>221028443Yeah the comedy was easily the weakest part of the movie. There were a few good bits here and there but it tries way too hard to make you laugh every 10 seconds, which just becomes exhausting when most of the jokes don't land.
>>221028612The movie really feels like several scripts Frankensteined together. It’s tonally all over the place and can’t decide what it’s going for.
>>221026285It’s iron man in space. Which is what the mandelorian should have been.
It's rated PG-13 and is filled with adult themes and innuendo. They weren't marketing it to children. It's almost 1:1 tonally similar to Transformers '07. That's really the movie's only major issue; it came 20 years too late.I imagine it'll do ridiculous numbers streaming. Unfortunate that it released during the Summer Horror season.
>>221024570>heh you're going to see He-Man what are you, ga->I'm a homosexual. I'm going to go into the cinema completely naked and ejaculate onto the screen, and when the ushers try to remove me, I will rape them
>>221026202Correct.
>>221028059
>>221025390Hard to say. I'm 46 and prefer the 2002 version, but Mattel cancelled that line and brought back the shitty original version because other nerds wanted their soft rubber heads and identical bodies.>>221025396He-man has this issue of being early for core Millenials and late for core Gen-X. Kevin Smith born in 1970 saying he loved He-man was complete bullshit when my brother born in 1977 aged out of it by 1985.It also had the problem of the tie-in cartoon being noticeably shitty to to the point that even the girl spinoff was considered a better show. By the second season episodes were 75% recycled footage from earlier episodes. When GI Joe, Transformers, and Thundercats came along it didn't stand a chance.
>>221028197This.I hate it>>221028233that shoit should be on Earth to begin with and nobody wants to see woke shit, eves as a mockery>>221028358sure, because all movies until woke shit always bombed
>>221026285Cause Marvel went griddy 2 for years and folk wanted to see colours in theyr movies.
>>221028757Yeah, the movie is way too long. It really would’ve benefited from cutting it to under two hours imo.
>>221028684It would have been cringe emasculated shit with blackwashes even 20 years ago, unless it was a completely different movie
>>221026866Yeah, the endless franchises nowadays seem bizarre and unhealthy. IPs used to have a growth and decline lifecycle to them. Now they just endlessly remake the same franchises instead of creating new ones to replace the old.
>>221028746The original version is the real deal>>221028746>Kevin Smith born in 1970 saying he loved He-manOnly when he was marketing that shetty flopped series. In previous interviews he said he hated it and later he said he enjoyed doing all the shit fans hated.It's easy to see why it flopped
>>221028645Wasn't it in development hell for 2 decades? Wouldn't be surprised if they just used a bunch of old material and just tried to salvage it.>>221028779A lot of it could've been trimmed up. The comic shop scene alone went on for ages when it could've just been>Adam mistakes the first guy and then immediately finds the right guy and the sword.>Quickly takes the sword out, fails to get by home and then bails when everyone looks at him like he's nuts.
>>221028779It would have benefitted from being a completely different take, with no wokeness, no cringe and no marvelitis
>>221028868>Wasn't it in development hell for 2 decades?It was and I think it really shows. It feels very dated coming years after the general public had already gotten sick of the MCU formula.
>>22102391325 here and I thought the trailer looked cool but then I found out it was over 2 hours long and I already had to see Backrooms and TADC this month for like 60 dollars and a single soda costs 9 dollars if I want to sneak in vodka for me and my gf. Young people dont have infinite disposable income to spend so its not surprising it didnt do well when it released alongside other big movies.
>>221028878I know Avatar has a lot of haters on this board, but I wish more modern blockbusters had James Cameron’s sincerity. Yes, the thing is called unobtanium and that’s just what it’s called. The characters in-universe aren’t making jokes and calling out the premise for being stupid.
>>221028828it's because companies themselves can't actually create anything, they need people to come to them with viable ideas, or they need to hire writers to do specific projects who have viable ideas. the real reason media is so bad now is because so many of the potential creative people are instead getting addicted to vidya and the internet and never write anything.
What's worse is there was already two cartoon reboots recent enough that both failed. How much more evidence do they need that there is no audience for this shit?
>>221028952I'll give you that about Avatar, but it's still a godawful boring cgi tech demo with trite setting and characters. Saw the first one, got bored to tears and never came back for the sequels
>>221028983every single decade had at least one MOTU revival attempt and it always failed, if not outright bombed
>>221028986That’s fair. I just really like that it’s totally unapologetic and not embarrassed to be what it is. This He-Man movie really would’ve benefited from that kind of sincerity instead of constantly mocking itself.
>>221023913They hired the guy (Travis Knight) who killed off Transformers with the same gay mix of woke feminism and source material wankery. No shit
>>221029137Son of Nike founder Phil Knight btw
I shouldn't like this movie, too bad it flopped so we won't get sequel with She-Ra.Movie had surprisingly a lot of good looking chicks. (Not you HR lady)
>>221023913>zoomers have never heard of him>millenials don't care about him>gen x loved him but they hate the director and think he's a fag
>>22102545690% of slop released today is unintentionally campier than any of the campiest shit from the 80s.
>>221029186>rich nepobaby is a woke leftist retardOne day this needs to be studied
>>221029246The only difference is the modern stuff has the characters go "We know this is camp. The writers of this movie know this movie is silly and aren't actually babies who think this is cool. Obviously they could write sophisticated drab courtroom dramas if they wanted to", and then another character says "Who are you talking to? Writers?" and it just goes on like that.
>>221028712This is my genuine dogshit unironic opinion you stupid nigger kikejeet. What are you, an autist with a vendetta against this movie or is there some kind of campaign against this movie for some reason?
>>221023913The Dungeons & Dragons movie from a few years ago was a much better version of this to me. It managed to be funny while still clearly coming from a place of sincere love for the property.
>>221024000>>221024023correctIf you were born after 1988 He-Man was LONG gone by the time you were old enough to watch Saturday morning cartoons. same with GI Joe and hell even Transformers. by 1994 it was Power Rangers and Beast Wars.
>>221029324Yeah, it was good. There were flaws with it, but it didn't seem to be written with malice towards the target audience. A lot of movies are written intentionally to make "manbabies" mad and then they complain when that happens.
>>221029358Born 87 and I had the animated movie on VHS, but I don't think I ever saw any re-runs of the show. Transformers, Ghostbusters, and Turtles were the important things, and with Transformers it was through re-runs. That checks out.
>>221029137>woke feminismWhat? What the fuck are you talking about nigger?>source material wankeryGod forbid a movie cite its sources. What the fuck is wrong with you you sad little faggot lmao
>>221023913I'm 39 and I watched he-man when I was a kid, also this movie. It's a fine product, no worse and no better than your average capeshit. Back in 2025 it would've made a billion. Today it flops.
>>221029426>20252015*
>>221029405You're trying way too hard to fit in tranny
>>221029312>or is there some kind of campaign against this movie for some reason?This board always gets flooded with the dogshit anons from all the other boards everytime something new comes out.
>>221024034i'm 26. I probably wouldn't
>>221029458This one seems really weird to me because He-man is such an old franchise. How is there even a gremlin sitting in his room all day waiting to spam threads about a fresh MOTU movie with untrue garbage and vitriol? This guy responds to every post. Amazing
>>221029137>killed off Transformers with the same gay mix of woke feminism and source material wankery.Bumblebee was the one he worked on and that was the last Transformer thing to turn a profit. So that killed it somehow and not the two bombs that came after?
>>221029502It turned off the casual male audience that showed up to Bayformers so yeah absolutely 100%. That is why this movie bombed too. That audience is a lot more careful nowadays
>>221023913No homo but this actors hair is beautiful
>>221029617It's not actor, it's he-man
>>221029482I assume 4chan just hires indians or malaysians or whatever to do it.
>>221029649This movie is bombing, next to no one wants to see it. But no, it MUST be a conspiracy of indians and malayisans being PAID by 4chan to badmouth the movie ...you fucking moron.
>>221023913I'll watch it today, my local kinoplex just happens to line up TADC, He-Man and Scary Movie
>>221023913I'm 19 and watched it. I watched some He-Man as a kid but it wasn't that big of a thing for me. I watched the movie because I'm a sucker for 80s muscular guy with long hair aesthetics
>>221030055That’s the most frustrating part about this movie. The universe fucking rules because anything goes. You can have sword and sorcery, but also robots, spaceships and lasers. But the movie insists on making fun of itself at every turn.
>>221024299I have never met or heard of any man around that age being a huge fan of He-Man.Transformers, yes, He-Man, no.He-Man the cartoon sucked and the toys sucked.
>>221030768I’m 42. Loved MotU because >>221030692, but yeah, the action figures themselves looked like shit. The original 80s Transformers line was very high quality due to Japanese craftsmanship.
My late 40 cousin was a big he man fan but I don't think he has any interest in the movie. Did they really think this would capture young boys or late teens?
>>221030821That’s the movie’s biggest issue. It feels very dated due to being in development hell for so long. Applying the MCU formula years after mainstream audiences got tired of it.
>>221025390>Is it true that the very, very small group of actual hardcore He-Man fans prefer the 2002 version?The early 2000s He-Man had better animation and more mature writing. The 80s version had terrible animation and Scooby Doo level writing.
>>221023913But everyone here and on Youtube was talking about how the trailer had more views than anything else and how it was anti-woke and tradpilled? What is the meaning of this?
>>221030900The simple answer is that online nerd culture bubbles in no way represent the wider general audience.
>>221027486There are things that can just be near timeless and reworked for newer generations like Scooby doo. Transformers and tmnt never had a comparable down time like he-man did you had some cartoon in 2010s that got canned quick and I think one other series not counting that Kevin Smith thing.I really do have to wonder how many kids actually read comic books and if it can be used as some way to gauge their interests but we might never actually know.