Which one are you Anon?
Man, they did not get their moneys worth with this shit.
>>221957016better add another category because of the schizo "rotten tomatoes score is ackshually 56%" cope
holy fuck kill everyone who proompts shitty jaks out of an llmas if jaks weren't low-effort schizo garbage already
im literally chuddah
>>221957085also the "adjust for inflation!" cope
>>221957016
>>221957016no amount of movies or memes is going to overcome the fact that hollywood has lost all its talent. they can't seem to make anything but wokeslop, and they even deny that they are doing so.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Pov0MKuyJfg&pp=0gcJCZsLAYcqIYzv&ra=m
>>221957210chuds can't meme
Imagine how triggered you'd have to be to make this image
>>221957245imagine how triggered you have to be to be a chud actually using one of these copes
AI wojak rage comics really are the fitting end to the internet when you think about it
>>221957298what does that word mean?
>>221957373
>>221957334True. Just tell me it's terminal, doc.
Reminder this jeet has been having a temper tantrum since his historical larp was btfo
>>221957016>>221957210we need to go deeper (very epic nolan reference for my fellow redditors on 4channel)
>>221957525Nice resolution m8
>>221957016i'm the one that's not reading all of that
>>221957547Get off your phone shitjeet.
>>221957016Why are incels so mad about The Odyssey? Is it because there's a black woman in the movie, even though the movie is a mythological story which never actually took place?
>>221957590Yes. They are having a nuclear level meltie over it.
>>221957590>>221957606>samefagging and playing dumb
>>221957245Whos more triggered the person who made an AI image meme about peoples reactions to the odyssey or the person who crafts a conspiracy of review sites faking critic reviews, hiding audience reviews and studios buying tickets.
>>221957641settle down alex
>>221957641>who crafts a conspiracy of review sites faking critic reviewsThey have been caught doing this before though
>>221957016delicious tranny tears
>>221957665No.
>>221957732Yes it did, the same shit happened with Captain Marvel.
>>221957665There was 1 case on a shitty movie with a studio that bribed about 10 low level reviewers to leave good reviews and screened it exclusively to them so the film would sit at 100% rotten tomatoes until wide release. There's an argument to be made that when RT added a bunch of "new media" reviewers there is more room for unprofessionalism and bribery which is correct but they also added the "Top critics" filter which filters for traditional media.But honestly the biggest argument against critic bribing is that plenty of big budget movies get terrible reviews all the time, Moana is at 31%, with 19% top critics, which is 250mil budget disney film.
>>221957784No it didn't. That was also chuds hilariously coping.
>>221957802>okay it did happen but it wasn’t a big deal The only way to rid the world of such pathetic retardation is to cull the world of rats like you.
>>221957620What am I pretending to not understand? The fact that incels are seething over a black woman being cast in a movie?
>>221957811Yes it did and all you can do is cry and keep trying to gaslight while people point out and show how retarded you are.
>>221957016resorting to literal AIsloppa just shows how desperate they are
>>221957888
>>221957906>what do you mean Helen of Troy want black? You’re just mad about black women being in a movie
>>221957802I misremembered, heres the article, it was for 8 no name registered criticshttps://screenrant.com/rotten-tomatoes-purchased-positive-score/There's definitely alot of sway and gamification that happens for small limited release early in the release cycle in terms of pre selecting who sees which film, but for larger releases (like the odyssey with over 400 reviews) there really is not much room for gamification and it is highly unlikely to be happening for traditional media who have no problem slating every disney remake.
>>221957016leftists really cant makenigger bottom text
>>221957944Not a meme, jamboy.
>>221957988
>>221957998>proving my point right off the bat
bot thread
>>221957888Assume critics are being paid off on scale (what would be required for the Odyssey to be at 94%), what would we expect to see with this theory; High budget films would basically never get bad reviews, there would likely be whistle blowing reviewers who report payment from studios, we don't see any of this. QED movie reviewers are not being paid off on scale.
>>221957422Kek it do be like that
>>221958079>High budget films would basically never get bad reviewsNo, they would just be drowned out by good reviews since the point is to saturate and present that the film is good. >there would likely be whistle blowing reviewers who report payment from studiosNot if they want to keep their job, not get blacklisted, or sued for libel (which even if they end up being heard they would still end up going into massive amounts of debt due to legal fees). You’re effectively trying to argue that the film industry isn’t scummy as shit at this point.
>>221958156>No, they would just be drowned out by good reviews since the point is to saturate and present that the film is good.I should have been more specific, "would never get bad reviews *overall*" Also what you're saying doesn't happen, evidenced by Moana being at 31% RT score (just using a recent example).>Not if they want to keep their job, not get blacklisted, or sued for libel (which even if they end up being heard they would still end up going into massive amounts of debt due to legal fees). You’re effectively trying to argue that the film industry isn’t scummy as shit at this point.Sure, but this requires running a 100% water tight ship across countless organisations, the odds of no one whistleblowing in that arrangement is extremely low to non existent.
>>221958289>I should have been more specific, "would never get bad reviews *overall*" Also what you're saying doesn't happen, evidenced by Moana being at 31% RT scoreConsidering the Mouse is quickly going down the shitter and Moana is live action remake of a movie that didn’t even release ten years ago they are in no shape to pay anyone off.>Sure, but this requires running a 100% water tight ship across countless organisationsOr just the ability to keep enough people silent while drowning out excess noise with saturation propaganda and distractions. Like how no one can actually talk about this shit movie without some jeets spamming the same lefty/pol/ cope memes for hours. You know, the shit they have been doing for years and it only gets discussed on niche image boards and forums because normalfags fall for the jingling keys routine?
>>221957620its so tiresome
>>221958368>too retarded to argue>samefags with even dumber strawman
>>221958389I see you finally dropped the term "metapolitical" from your schizo spam. You accepted its not happening, huh chuddie? Still screenshotting your own posts though to repost them as if they're some kind of legendary meme :/
>>221958368It’s so funny that the tweet is by millennial woes. I know most people don’t remember him, or even know who the fuck he is, but the dude was a huge lolcow back in the 2010s. There’s too much lore on him to succinctly go over, but just no that he gave a tryhard speech on how “you can not defeat the alt right. We are legion, expect us”, and that he’s a massive sex pest
>>221958447>I see you finally dropped the term "metapolitical" from your schizo spamThis is where the jeet enters into a delusion to cope with the fact that he failed to play dumb and outed the fact that he’s a dishonest retard.>Still screenshotting your own postsThe pic was posted in another thread. But thanks for admitting that it’s just you doing damage control for this shit in every thread.
>>221958366>they are in no shape to pay anyone off.Star wars episode 9 is rotten and that released after Disney had their most successful year at the boxoffice ever (with multiple films receiving rotten scores). Also they borrow money, if there's no ROI on paying off critics then why would studios do it? Moana had a 250mil budget + 150mil advertising, how much are they paying critics for them to not be able to afford it?>Or just the ability to keep enough people silent while drowning out excess noise with saturation propaganda and distractions. Like how no one can actually talk about this shit movie without some jeets spamming the same lefty/pol/ cope memes for hours. You know, the shit they have been doing for years and it only gets discussed on niche image boards and forums because normalfags fall for the jingling keys routine?1. I'm whiter than you, 2. Companies get whistle blown for far more impactful conspiracies than this.
>>221958515more unintelligible rantingI literally have no idea what you are referencing. Go on, post the tweet again.
>>221958479I like the tweet desu, leftists do purposefully misunderstand stuff, the issue is that approx 95% of the right is retarded, so ofc their going to misuse it.
>>221958479He is also TINY
>>221958529>Star wars episode 9 is rotten and that released after Disney had their most successful year at the boxoffice ever (with multiple films receiving rotten scores)What they SAID was their most successful year ever. >Also they borrow moneyTo keep themselves up not to hire people to suck off their shit. >I'm whiter than youI never said you were a jeet just pointing out what happened. But you getting insecure tells me your skin is the color of shit.>Companies get whistle blown for far more impactful conspiracies than thisAnd hardly anyone talks about it and it’s gets pushed out of people’s heads by other shit. You’re not doing anything save trying desperately to ignore the state of reality.
>>221958548>more unintelligible ranting
>>221957016You lazy subliterate bum.Add more text.
you know you "won" when you have to make up a fake box office number to brag about instead of using the real oneactual tranny schizo lmao
>>221958566It’s not exclusive to the left either. They absolutely do that tactic, but you see it used on the right constantly too. It’s just a shitty tactic that’s been used in discourse forever
>>221958637kinda like y'all are doing rn?
>>221958600>What they SAID was their most successful year everYou can look up Disney's 2019 Boxoffice numbers, they made alot of money. They are also a public company and do earnings reports where they are legally required to be truthful.>To keep themselves up not to hire people to suck off their shit.What? Presumably you think reviewers are being paid off as part of the films marketing, not because the stuidos just like it? of course they woukd borrow money to advertise a film, if theyre debt financing there is no distinction, I don't think you've thought about this all that much. >And hardly anyone talks about it and it’s gets pushed out of people’s heads by other shit.Companies get fined millions because of whistle blowing... It is just not possible logistically to pay off 80%+ of reviewers and to not have anyone speak out, to think that is not based in reality.
>guys!! the movie made multiple billions in my mind, the voices told me so!>that means WE won and (You) lostseek professional help
>>221958673Its different when the right does it because they aren't pretending.
>>221958720>they are legally required to be truthful>legally >required The fact that faggots like you will constantly say these companies are breaking the law about so much shit but then pretend it’s not happening when it’s about them publishing how much money they make will never cease to be retarded.>What? Presumably you think reviewers are being paid off as part of the films marketingYes, which would mean they need the money to actually market it which they would need to be able to spend without fucking themselves over. >Companies get fined millions because of whistle blowingA fine is nothing, seriously what the fuck are you doing? Are you really trying to pretend that these companies give a shit about fines? >just not possible logistically to pay off 80%+ of reviewersBut it is possible to pay enough to drown out anything they don’t like or pay the companies the reviewers work for.
>>221958570Ohnonono woesbros HAHAHAHANo wonder he’s always so angry. Manley rage is potent
>>221957016Where's the "don't worry racist Asia is based and will reject this movie" panel
>>221958834You’re coping to an astronomical level anon. It’s time to stop
>>221958834>The fact that faggots like you will constantly say these companies are breaking the law about so much shit but then pretend it’s not happening when it’s about them publishing how much money they make will never cease to be retarded.Yeah sure every company is doing everything illegally everything is a lie, sure thing. >Yes, which would mean they need the money to actually market it which they would need to be able to spend without fucking themselves over.If they think it has a positive ROI then they would debt finance it, once again, I'm sure Disney could get a few million to bribe some reviewers. Do you not understand companies can borrow money?>A fine is nothing, seriously what the fuck are you doing? Are you really trying to pretend that these companies give a shit about fines?Its not a fine that is relevant here its, its literally anything that could indicate film reviewers are being paid off.>But it is possible to pay enough to drown out anything they don’t like or pay the companies the reviewers work forWhich would require 80%+ of reviewers to be paid off. You have a view of reality which is fundamentally not supported in any evidence based way and has no ability to describe events which happen, you highly delusional, def sub 80 IQ.
>>221957016Cultural Impact Denier and Chuddah. I fully think that reviewers are both retarded and a good number of them are bought off too but audiences are also retards so I don't think they will reject it.
>>221958904gonna add that one, the inflation coper, and the 'only domestic counts' coper to the next edition.any more I forgot?
>>221959011Everything posted by this anon: >>221958834
>>221959062I don't even understand that guy, and I thought I spoke fluent chud. Can anyone translate for me?
>>221959105Yes. I’ve organised all his posts into one succinct translation here:https://youtube.com/shorts/30SRQ5RVQiM
>>221957016None, I'm an accelerationist who enjoys watching large-scale butthurt, no matter which side is bleeding from the anus.Crashing this plane, with no survivors.
>>221959363Based. Same here. It’s amazing seeing them call you a leftist SJW when you poke fun at them, knowing I was also poking fun at supergirl flopping. They’re unable to comprehend that some people aren’t on one side of their gay “culture war” and just like to laugh at meltdowns on the internet
>>221957016which one makes you the most mad?
>>221957620leftists pretend not to understand thingsrightoids genuinely don't understand things and just call you a variation of faggot when you actually try to argue with them
>>221958368kek, saving this one
>>221957998literally proved his point...
>>221957016>>221959482you spent 3 hours making these forced """memes""" because 4chan anons pointed out that helen of troy wasn't black
>>221959770>y-you spent time making that!!!!My favorite cope.
>>221959770>you spent 3 hours making these forced """memes"""Usually y'all rage at me for not spending any time on them and letting AI do it. "nooo that's lazy!!! jeeeet!" etcWhich one is it?
>>221959406I'm starting to think we are a dying breed. 4chan was always the home of edgelords and shitlords, now it's overrun by chuds who actually genuinely care about outrage. If you want to troll this place nowadays, just say something nice about women or that trannies aren't literal monsters, and simply sit back and bask in all the relentless seething.
>>221959770Took me about five minutes to make this >>221959482Totally worth it for all the seething replies I've gotten to it.
>>221957016>>221957210>had to change the #9 "cope" because it was actually the truth
>>221957580lmao, that projecting
>>221957707lick my dilator
>>221959482Looks like you're getting raped. Why are you embarrassing yourself like this?
>>221957016I'm the one who refused to see the movie because they purposely cast a non-beautiful dark black woman to own the Chuds then laughed as white liberals, redditors, and trannies pretended The Odyssey was better than The Prestige or Lord of the Rings.
>>221960313u mad, u maaaad :)
>>221960332But why would you post an image of people beating you online? And the tweet in it is irrelevant. The left and right both hate you.
>>221960023It was the 2016 influx of election tourists that did it. People were supporting Trump ironically because at the time it was funny to imagine a goofball running the country. Poes Law went into full effect, and since has been overwhelmed by people who take things at face value.It sucks, but then again it does make it very easy to make people angry
>>2219604512016 was 10 years ago. How have these guys not grown up yet?
Jeetslop AI is not an argument btw The left can’t meme
>>221960661Because they’re people who require others to subsist. They need someone to be subservient to
>>221960687>it's AI, therefore it doesn't countAre we literally r*ddit now?
Chuds haven't lost a culture war this badly since Charlie Kirk committed suicide.
>>221960930>Are we literally r*ddit now?No it's just you.
>>221957210
>>221961023It was so funny how they all claimed to start a civil war but then realized they would have to actually leave the basement
>>221961267kekWe're hitting new levels of shitposting here.
>>221961446>that comicLmfao. They really did think it would lead to a revolution didn’t they?Remember when Sam Hyde cried and wanted Palantir to monitor everyone?
>>221960930Says the reddit nigger that can’t argue without prompting AI. Try harder
>>221958479All I know is he sucked dick like fuentes
