[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Mike shoots ya.jpg (18 KB, 384x520)
18 KB JPG
I remember people sucking their cock for literally anything they did or said back in the mid-to-late 2010s, why are so many people dunking on them now?

I still really like them to be honest, I rewatch their old videos (and even more recent ones) all the time, and I really can't blame them for slowing down recently since 98% of the films that get released are complete and total slop.

The really grey and boring kind of slop, where there's really nothing to say about them. So, the channel has definitely declined but I don't think it's necessarily for a lack of effort.
>>
Basically anti AI luddites hating on Mike for watching AI slop of Star Trek like the boomer that he is.
Normalfags are quick to turn to witch hunting if you haven't noticed.
>>
>>223667323
He watched Star Trek AI slop?
>>
>>223667298
Being fat and old mainly. The booze is catching up with Mike hard and it's wrecking havoc on his brain.
>>
people hate on them?
>>
>>223667323
>only luddites are anti-slop, goy
>>
>>223667339
It was actually Star Wars AI slop based on the Thrawn trilogy of books. I checked it out and it was horrific beyond belief.
>>
>>223667346
I keep seeing people talking shit about them on here

Now, I didn't use 4Chan that much back in the Golden Era of RLM so I don't know if people were like this back then too, all I remember is finding their stuff EVERYWHERE, as soon as anything film-related popped up so would their material and people really worshipped the ground that they walked on

And I think they're still a terrific channel, they've certainly fallen off a little bit but nothing irreversible
>>
>>223667371
>I checked it out and it was horrific beyond belief.

Color me surprised lmao

But did Mike watch it unironically or was it just for the lulz?
>>
The TOS video was pretty brutal. Mike thinking TOS could be improved by AI making it look like STD/SNW while preserving the original acting and dialogue was a mystifying take
>>
>>223667398
I haven't watched that one yet...now I'm afraid to

Mike is pulling a George Lucas only with even less effort since it's AI slop
>>
>>223667298
It's the standard YouTuber cycle:
1. Kids watch YouTuber believe everything they say
2. Kids grow up and realize the YouTuber was an embarrassing retard
3a. Most people say "oh well, whatever"
3b. Some "people" get really angry and proceed to aylawg the YouTuber

Zibbidy Zogggflaf that's doing great now will have the same thing in the 2030's when some of their fans grow up.
>>
>>223667381
In terms of popularity, normalfags like RLM when they are cynical about Hollywood blockbuster slop. The peak capeshit era with Marvel Phases 1-3, the DCEU, the Fox movies was the golden age for the channel's popularity with Mike and Jay on Half in the Bag making fun of most of it while praising the few movies that stood out. I honestly think they made a ton of money or Patreon subs from that time and are a lot more content now to show all their less likable opinions and just talk about whatever they want. But what they want is not what their audience wants. People still bother them to review The Batman but Mike would rather still AI for Star Trek, or badly review obscure 80s movies.
>>
>>223667346
the classic cycle
people ironically hate on them on 4chan because they are fans and doing a bit
autist zoomers cannot detect sarcasm and make it part of their personality to fit in
>>
>>223667398
The audio was also terrible on the video. they're slipping
>>
>>223667364
don't reply to indians



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.