Wait, 5050 is a good card?
>>732319705>98% GPU>29% CPUat 1080p with deepslop on, lmao
>>732319705>RTX 5050 Might Surprise YouYeah, looking at the image it sure is surprising me.
>DLSS>QualitySAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>>732319818Yes, that's how uncapped framerate works.
>99wnot bad honestly, my amd idles at that much while only watching youtube videos lol
>>732319915DLSS preset K Quality looks great
it's 95% as powerful as a 1080ti, at 40% the power draw. if games weren't unoptimized as fuck all it would be considered pretty damn good.
The best graphics card is the one you own. Assuming it works, that is.Even in this era of unoptimized garbage, even the fucking 3060 can still run every single game in what I would consider a playable state. And yes 30fps with heavy use of DLSS is indeed playable, ignore anyone on 4chan who says otherwise, they're completely out of touch, look at the current popularity of FF7 Remake on Switch 2 for proof of what people consider good enough.
>>732319705I'm glad that I bought a 5080 FE so that I don't have to put up with fake frame input lag crutches.
>>732320426what res you playing at?
>>7323204681440p.
>>732320339>people
>>732320495a little overkill but not really when you factor that 5080 at 1440p will still be elite for at least another 6 years.
>>732319705even 3050 is good enough for your average gamer, just look at the steam gpu surveythose techtuber opinion is just inrelevant for the masses
>>732320780Not him, but I just got a 1440p OLED for my 5080. Will use my previous 1080p IPS for work.I wanted to meme it up with 5080, 1080p, ray-tracing max settings, but that shit is just too noisy at 1080p.
>>732320039Cope, all new prests are ovesrharped and ghostly shit
>>732320930K isnt really new, the new ones do look weird though, worse performance too
I always liked xx50 cardsThe problem>GeForce 750>2014>$119>GeForce 1050>2016>$139>GeForce 1650>2019>$149>GeForce 3050>2022>$249>GeForce 5050>2025>$299
>>732320925I feel like ray/path tracing is still a meme, it is futuristic graphics tech that they're trying to force onto us a decade or two early just to scam money from people with overpriced products.
>frametime: 15.4ms>recognize that 16 and 2/3rds is 60fps>there are 1000ms in one second>reports 73fps>1000 / 15.4 = 64 fpsLooks like nothing there makes any fucking sense. The framerate listed is impossible with that frametime.>5050 is a good card?Apparently in a way that is physically impossible, yes.
>>732319705I play new video games on medium settings with my 8 year old 1080Tech enthusiasts are so far up their own asses in chasing the newest crap that they’re completely oblivious to reality
>>732321207The 750 was so cool because you could slap it in literally any computer with a PCIE slot and match the then-new PS4 and Xbox One in any game
>>732321207grim, 5050 could had been great but at that price theres no reason to not go for a 5060
>>732319705>5050 can run a 2 year old game at a 20 year old resolution upscaled to a 16 year old resolution at mediocre settingswoooow so cool thank you jensen for gimping every gpu in favor of datacenter trash
thinking of getting a 3050 to build a bazzite box with an old ryzen 5 2600 and some ddr4 i have sitting around from an old build. was almost tempted to get an arc pro b50 but then i learned arc cards have massive cpu overhead issues with older cpuswhy did intel drop the ball for budget pc gamers?
>>732323340Because they want you to get a cheap i5 12400F.
>>732324089are those bad?
>>732324208No, its a cheap Intel CPU that has Rebar and other memes needed for Intel GPUs to work well.
>>732319705I dunno man, seems 50/50
