[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>As the video-game industry barrels through the fourth year of a post-pandemic crisis caused by all sorts of factors (from game market oversaturation to the diminishing appetite from venture capital funds), developers are looking for a way forward. Budgets are swelling while revenue is not. High-end games have grown more costly to buy, jumping from $60 to $70 in the 2020s even as the cost of living has gone way up for many consumers.
>But two things have changed significantly. One is that distribution has pivoted from mostly physical to almost entirely digital, lowering costs and boosting profit margins. Publishers like Electronic Arts Inc. might make roughly $35 on a $70 physical game but that jumps to $49 for digital, according to analyst Serkan Toto. If they'd kept the $60 price tag, they'd still be pocketing $42 per digital game and making more money per unit.
>The other thing that's changed is the number of options. In the early 2000s, even crummy licensed games could move copies at $60 if they were positioned correctly on the Walmart store shelf, because those were all people could find. Today, there are essentially an infinite number of new games to play, including free, user-generated experiences on platforms like Roblox. There's no reason for cash-strapped players to spend $70 on a game that doesn't blow them away.


Wait so they purposely raise the prices of games, sell them to us unfinished, and now suddenly they're on our side saying games should be cheaper?
What the fuck was their game plan here?????
>>
>>732954928
A jew is telling me things should be cheaper???????
>>
>>732954928
>scum journo rag in partnership with the biggest piece of shit in games """"""""""""""journalism""""""""""""""" tries to curry favor.
lol eat shit
>>
People have, for years, been more likely to click on things that make them angry. As you might expect, people have gotten tired of this and instead are gravitating towards only ever clicking on things that align with their world view; as such, you will see mainstream opinion pieces start to move towards agreeing with extremely mild takes.
>>
>>732954928
jew
>>
Consoles got so expensive that there's really a hard entry point for new people to get into console gaming.

Kids play on phones, as they grow up they get a laptop to study or work and might get into some not very demanding PC gaming.
Consoles are a bit fucked at the moment. They're becoming a platform for old people.
>>
Wasn’t he one of the crybabies ehining about Silksong being “too cheap” and undercutting all the AAA games that came out at $80+?
>>
Didn't wilds just sell millions @70
>>
File: 1751150628624563.jpg (37 KB, 495x600)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>732954928
>2025
>games HAVE to be 100 bucks at least to sustain the industry!
>beginning of 2026
>games NEED to be less than 60 bucks to sustain the industry!
>>
>>732955547
Something must've happened cause yeah the same guy was championing for $100 games
>>
>>732955547
Yeah they tried to really extort the consumers and its taken multiple big industry failures for them to admit that it doesn't work
>>
>>732955357
only people that like cheap shit bought it
>>
Like 15 years ago the last quarter of the year was always busy with AAA games.

Now games from the same series take 4-8 years to make, despite almost always being worse. They're in development for so long, that by the time they release, the trend they tried to chase became old and tired.

For past few years, the industry took like one game released that year and astroturfed it into gotyay.

People got used to not buying games, especially since the most popular online games are years old games with seasonal content.
>>
>4chan now supports $70 games
I thought we all supported piracy? Obviously we’re never going to buy games, but you’d think the “free is too expensive” movement would at least be against $70 games, right?
>>
Is he wrong
>>
>>732954928
Nintendo already changed their strats in europe. Pretty sure the switch 2 is doing really bad over here. In the switch 1 days, you could buy a game day one, because the price will never go down anyway.
Now, prime 4 is 37,-, Galaxy bundle is 50,-, pokemon is 47.
Everything goes down in a month
>>
File: 1752498034072121.gif (3.85 MB, 360x360)
3.85 MB
3.85 MB GIF
>shilltroons having a melty
he's right then
>>
Clair obscur had a sugar daddy who funded the game. It's a bad example.
>>
File: yandere handjob.jpg (727 KB, 1216x949)
727 KB
727 KB JPG
>>732955547
>2025
>fucked around
>2026
>found out
>>
>>732955062
Things are turning to normal. That's how it used to be.
>>
>>732959434
It's a good example because it competed with AAA and won despite costing a tenth as much to make.
>>
>>732954928

> Korean Crimson Desert and Japanese Death stranding 2 both releasing with expensive price tags next month
> every blackrock AAA kike studio is closing or laying off half their staff
> massive push to re-release 15 year old games made by team of white guys cause everything new from USA sucks fucking ass

wall street kikes must attack
>>
File: 1569453037939.png (29 KB, 1050x756)
29 KB
29 KB PNG
>>732954928
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNo I think games should go up to $80 actually. Then the gaming 'industry' can collapse and we can hunt and butcher everyone with a 'game design degree' and it'll only be individuals and small teams making passion projects for neckbearded stinky nerds such as myself once again
>>
>>732954928
Games should be $200 so this piece of shit """industry""" that doesn't remotely represent actual gamers can collapse into the fucking ground.
>>
>>732960402
>>732960479
This
>>
>>732955062
survival mechanism
they'd rather make a lower profit in the short term and prop up the system they've already infiltrated over having to start all over again with the decentralized indie scene
>>
>>732959434
Even if it cost closer to 10 million that is nothing compared to the ridiculous amount of money that these companies have been sinking into those dogshit trash fires for the last 10 years
>>
>>732960402
>The industry will totally collapse
Youve been saying this for 8 years now
>>
>>732954928
When a Jew is saying the right thing, you know we're about to get a mega snowstorm. Woke truly is dead.
>>
>>732954928
>Fourth year post pandemic
>It is the year 2026 and Developers STILL love to use "THE COVID PANDEMIC!!!!" as their favorite excuse despite being over 6 years ago
Kek
>>
>>732954928
And yet Highguard was $0 and still flopped. The real problem is that devs aren't making good games much more than the price tag, although the latter does not help either.
If E33, a pretty good 8/10 game but not some masterpiece, came out in a year that anyone else was making good games, it wouldn't have gotten such a huge spotlight on it. It's just a testament to how little talent is left in the industry, needing ballooning budgets for middling, milquetoast games absolutely no one is interested in. No one bought Veilguard because it was fucking garbage, and it didn't move units when the price was cut in half. No one bought Concord because it was another tired game in a saturated genre (and was only $40 to boot).

The people working at studios are talentless, and the leaders are spineless and deathly afraid of any experimentation, ironically ensuring the game will fail because it ends up being homogeneous trash no one remotely cares about.
>>
>>732961116
It's been happening steadily for two weeks for over 8 years.
>>
Tendies are NOT gonna like this.
>>
>>732961720
Just two more weeks until the prices drop then
>>
lmfao what happened to GTA 6 SHOULD BE AT LEAST $100!!!
i'm noticing and i'm not forgetting
>>
>>732961430
>investors pull out of gaming to back ai
>suddenly the industry wants games to be cheap again
Hmm...
>>
>>732954928
>[Bloomberg/Jason Schreier] Video Games Need to be Cheaper to Buy
What (((Schreier))) is actually saying:

>Games need to be cheaper to produce
>That means AI. Yes, I'm shilling AI here.
>Anyone not demanding AI is a chud, incel and certainly not a gamer.
>>
>>732954928
Jews are bad, ok?
>>
File: 1744205025745414.png (193 KB, 720x730)
193 KB
193 KB PNG
>>732954928
i swear this kike was just saying a year ago that games need to be more expensive due to inflation
>>
>>732961986
Is that the reason? Honestly I'm suspicious of everything jews say.
>>
>>732955368
And Capcom lost a lot of goodwill because of it, g rank version will sell record low copies because the game is ass
>>
>>732962103
That's just my schizo pattern recognition, money is absolutely being pulled out of gaming to back AI instead though so there's less investors in the gaming market.
>>
>>732962405
Good if true.
>>
>>732955547
(((Schreier))) and others assumed that the demand for gaming was inelastic and they could charge whatever and people would still buy it. Turns out, demand is VERY elastic and the games that people buy a lot less at a $10 increase. Like most of the sequels to $60 games when they went to $70 sold half. Mind you, to make the same profits, it has to be within about 85% of the original. Now nothing is selling but everyone still has these massive budgets and turns out they can't raise the price anymore. The actual solution is fucking slash the budget and stop developing shit on the westcoast but the industry will never learn.
>>
>>732955062
Vlad Kliatchko is the CEO of Bloomberg L.P.
>>
I've been saying this shit for years, we really need a fucking retarded kike to tell us the obvious?
>>
File: 1366736146935.jpg (37 KB, 599x411)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>732954928
>Schreier
Fuck off.
>>
>>732962650
CEOs only listen to one specific group of "people"
>>
>>732962538
In addition: A lot of the $70+ games simply weren't good. Veilguard? Come on.
>>
My big issue is that most games no longer get permanently discounted anymore. They stay at $70 and then go on sale every other month. There's no reason for a 6 year old game to be full price.
>>
>>732955547
>Games sell few copies at 70$/80€
>I know, let's ask for fucking 100$/120€ for a game, so with our current sales we'll earn 30$ more per copy
>Sales decrease 50% because you priced people out of your game
These people have always been bottom of the barrel dumb, just look at how the most sold games lately are 60 or less.
>>
>>732962405
Other than a few exceptions, gaming is an awful investment.
>>
>>732962945
Money got heavily dumped into it during COVID, investors realized that bubble is over now I guess. All the failed live service games have to be adding onto that, the American gaming market is imploding.
>>
>>732962103
Like another anon said, there is no reasons to let an industry they completely dominate(*) pull an hero. The clever ones can tell there is a need for a strategic retreat, to better consolidate their position.

(*) in the west at least - China is immune, but they are making inroads in Japan thanks to investments with strings attached.
>>
>>732962914
Just Nintendo games. You can wait a few months and get games for cheap as shit.
>>
>>732962742
At this point, pretty much any AAA+ isn’t even worth 1/10th of what they are priced.
>>
>>732962538
IMO the problem is that these companies are both selling high initially and then also selling the game for fucking dirt cheap half a year later. Shit, the new CoD was $70 at launch and $35 a month later. Who the fuck feels confident buying games like that? Just wait the month and get it half off. Games will be $20 a year later and then that pulls the ladder from all the games releasing in the next year when you can just play year old games for dirt cheap forever instead.

Throw in the $30 early access or early DLCs and you could be looking at spending $100 for a new game at release. It's not sustainable when the market is flooded with so many free options that are becoming increasingly higher quality in order to compete against each other.
>>
>>732959434
The companies putting out 70$ games are sugar daddy tier so what's the excuse?
>>
>>732955062
The goyim need to be able to afford the AAA woke goyslop used to condition them.
>>
>>732954928
It means that their jobs are on the line.

its too late.
>>
>>732954928
Games need to be cheaper, this is a fact.
Journos do not deserve praise for stating the obvious however, and continue to deserve to be ridiculed and jeered at. This is also a fact.

Still not going to buy modern slop though until I know for a fact that the game industry is actually making games that are game first and money second.
>>
>>732963282
>gamers are playing xi's free games instead and getting served chinese propaganda
tragic
>>
>>732955073
fpbp
>>
>>732955062
>>732954928
Typical jewish scam.

Something is X.
Everyone likes it being X.
Force it to become Z.
Everyone hates it being Z.
Fight to have it become Y.
Everyone is grateful that it's not Z anymore.
Everyone forgets that it should be X.
Y is the New Normal.
People who only know Z and Y don't understand what X even is and call it uncshit, because they're zoomoidnegroids.
>>
>>732963156
Was there a AAA title in 2025 that was worth it's high price?
KDC2 yes. Very maybe Yotei.
AC, Indy, Doom, MH, BL no.
Avowed, E33, Nightreign, Mafia aren't really AAA.
>>
>>732963474
The gweilo are being served up big tit coomerslop also served up to the Chinese peasant. It is what it is.
>>
>>732963376
It will be hard for them to accept the pivot, the captive audience for gaming is just too big. Modern, post-WWII liberal democracies’ political stability almost entirely depends on the regime’s capacity to broadcast the message to a passive, defenceless population.
>>
lmao, things must be in complete disarray internally for this industry speakkike to pull a 180.
>>
>>732959226
Now lower the switch 2 price and maybe ill be interested
>>
>>732963791
the gamer uprising has started, you have ex world of warcraft fags being the main source of political news for a startling number of people. they need to release cheap games targeting gamers to quell them.

legitimately think how different the gaming landscape and even political landscape would be right now if asmongold was still stuck in bobby's kotick's maze because world of warcraft didn't get turned into the wokest shit imaginable.
>>
>>732956254
Nintendo of all companies being the first to do it made it unhip with games journalists. If literally any other company threw the first stone they'd be batting for it.
>>
>>732955062
Never trust a jew. Games should be more expensive to piss them off.
>>
>>732961116
>The industry will totally collapse
Already has. EA and Ubisoft belong to foreign capital, Activision got absorbed by MS which is quitting consoles, line go down perpetually.

>>732964102
Nonsense, they were all batting along for GTA's $100, if anything they were happy Nintendo could ease the blow.
>>
if nobody is buying at 70 or even 100 why not try 200? or 500? it has to work eventually.
>>
>>732964035
> the gamer uprising has started
I wish, but the truth is that the west is just getting poorer while China is pushing good enough, propaganda-free, freemium games.
>>
>>732961116
He's a retard. The industry won't collapse, it will simply change direction.
>>
>>732964328
>propaganda free

It's just chinese propaganda instead of American.
>>
>>732964196
> Already has.
Also 1/3 of western game devs having lost their jobs during the last couple of years. There is a gigantic reconfiguration of the industry underway.
>>
>>732964328
the major push against woke in media is coming from gamers and it's killing the gaming industry in the process. the rejection of woke is now seeping outside of the gaming community, the autism stopped being contained.
>>
>>732964521
At least Chinese propaganda is less degrading, less depraved and healthier than the (((western))) one.
>>
File: 1748748903666126.jpg (51 KB, 931x405)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
Games dont need to be cheaper, Nintendo successfully made games $80 and it's still selling well. Just make better games and people will be happy to pay more for them.
>>
>>732960176
retard
>>
>>732954928
For being a Jew, Schreier really is a fucking retard. The problem isn't the price, the problem is that most games are just fucking dogshit and not worth it even if you can get them on sale.
>>
>>732963617
if such tatics work then we deserve them
>>
File: 1765732497442541.jpg (46 KB, 645x770)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
He won. Bigly.
>>
>>732964727
That's not true either, quality games are known to not sell as they should on switch because they don't benefit from the brand loyalty.
>>
>>732964776
The fact that you need to pay like $100-120 to get the full version of any video game is definitely a problem.
>>
>>732964770
the old stereotype is that all they wanted to do is save money. "jew" was used as a synonym for being thrifty. well to be fair, it was also used as a synonym for ripping someone off...
>>
>>732961986
Hopefully, it stays that way. I don't want video games to ever get government or investor money again, honestly.
>>
>>732964841
True, but you need to understand that this tactic work perfectly well when executed over a significant period of time, because generational shifts.
This is how they successfully transformed US society into a w slave plantation during the past 70 years btw.
>>
>>732965197
Jews being subversive is centuries old. The catholic church was explicitly antisemitic until ww2. Luther wrote a whole book about it.
>>
>>732960762
This guy knows jews
>>
>>732965279
> I don't want video games to ever get government or investor money again, honestly.
Can’t allow that, I’m afraid.
Free, democratic voters might start to get ideas above their station if we stop telling them what is good for them.
>>
>>732955062
The price increase is resulting in lower overall sales. They'd love to charge $100 or more but only if the cattle actually follows along and keeps buying.
>>
File: IMG_7332.gif (3.74 MB, 714x714)
3.74 MB
3.74 MB GIF
>>732954928
imagine paying full price for a fucking game

if you aren’t waiting for a sale you are paying a premium to improve the game for me when i buy it
>>
>>732962331
>And Capcom lost a lot of goodwill
RE9 will outsell E33 within a month. Then you got people excited for Pragmata and Onimusha. They seem to be doing fine and they "outrage" was manufactured.
>>
The attitude of "you should buy games as a charity to the developers and a cause for the industry" is just fucking retarded and anti-capitalist. A game will fucking sell if there's organic demand for it. You don't need to shill it for free.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.