is this game good
>>733559457yes
I enjoyed it
>>733559457It's alright.
>>733559457Depends on what you want. Combat? One of the strangest and most hands-off in the series. Dungeons? They get the job done. Overworld? Really fun to get around in.
>>733559457it's alright. very forgettable
>>733559457Why not formulate your own opinion based on what you can see from trailers and gameplay and the like and then buy it yourself and see if it holds up? That's what we did back in the day and we ONLY had magazines and shitty commercials
I liked it for one play through, enough to 100@% it, and haven't been able to come back to it a second time. I get through the beginning, do a major dungeon or two, and just get bored and tired of the echos selection menu.
>>733561184Because we have more than magazines and commercials these days and being directly able to talk to likeminded anons is a benefit not a hindrance
>>733561250>likeminded anons>on 4chan>on /v/ specifically
>>733559457Yeah. Clever core gameplay, map was solid though I wish they'd get over ALttP, some neat gimmicks. Should've just given Zelda a normal bow instead of having Link mode.
>>733562659Thankfully the alttp portion if the map is small and the new portions of the map is good
>>733559457>Link mode ruins the intended 'Zelda-esque' gameplay >Most chests only contain rupees or smoothie ingredients, ruining exploration>Tri stops you constantly to comment on things you already know or figured out>Tons of cutscenes and unnecessary dialogue ruin the pacing>Danpe is once again useless with his dumb gimmick machines that take too long to activate in the heat of battleIt's okay at best.
>>733559457I honestly liked it more than the oracle games, the ds games, and minish cap.
nice core ideas, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired, if I hadn't played it for free I would feel robbed
