>Fortnite’s officially licensed Italian brainrot skin launch has sparked pushback from creators concerned over IP ownership on the platform. >On April 1, Fortnite released a set of in-game skins based on the meme characters Tung Tung Tung Sahur and Ballerina Cappuccina. The launch raised the hackles of some creators who are already using so-called “Italian brainrot” characters like Tung Tung Tung Sahur in their Fortnite or Roblox experiences. >The crux of the controversy is a debate over who is able to own and extract revenue from AI-generated memes. The company Mementum Labs has claimed legal ownership of Tung Tung Tung Sahur, licensing the character from its original creator, the Indonesian TikToker Noxa, and working with Epic Games to launch the character’s in-game skin earlier this month. However, Tung Tung Tung Sahur is a popular internet meme that was already present inside many creators’ virtual worlds prior to Mementum’s claim, muddying the waters over who exactly deserves credit for the character.
>>737380226>Epic Games’ acknowledgment of Mementum Labs’ IP ownership claim is the latest complication in an ongoing legal dispute over AI-generated memes. In November 2025, Spyder Games — a company owned by Roblox creator SpyderSammy, the chief product officer of DoBig Studios, which owns the popular Roblox experience Steal a Brainrot — filed a legal complaint against Mementum Lab claiming Mementum did not have the right to claim ownership of Tung Tung Tung Sahur and other AI-generated brainrot characters. The lawsuit is currently in process, but Spyder Games is confident in its argument because U.S. courts have not yet ruled in favor of any creator’s ownership of content created using large-language models or other generative-AI tools.>“The Italian Brainrot characters that we’re talking about here have all come out of AI image generators, and the copyright office has been very clear and very consistent in its guidance, which is that if something is generated by AI without sufficient human authorship, it’s not copyrightable — and no court has disagreed with that,” said Aaron Moss, a lawyer representing Spyder Games in the lawsuit, in an interview with GamesBeat.TLDR:
the ai company that made them
>>737380237Mementum says they bought the rights to AI generated meme characters from their creators and you have to pay for their use.Steal a Brainrot Roblox guys says no one owns the rights to AI generated characters and they're free to use.
Anything genre by AI should be automatically entered into the public domain.
i once tried to pin down the origin of this sticknigger and found it completely impossible, tiktok shit just has no real archiving to it. how the fuck did these suits trace it to some random indonesian tiktoker? sounds like bullshit to me>was already present inside many creator's virtual worldoh nevermind they just fucking made it up kek>not copyrightableGOOD. let the age of copyright free internet reign
>>737380487Fortnite is paying Mementum to use the Tung Tung skin so they're using that to strengthen their IP ownership claim.
Who owns the copyright for the most retarded shit you've seen in your life
>>737380584how does that strengthen the claim?
>disgusting sea muslim meme characterno thanks
>>737380293The companies themselves operate on a post intellectual property logic. I hope to see an end to ownership of my ideas, the Chinese never gave a shit anyway and they're going to be running the planet soon. Your market share shouldn't be you were the first to make the thing, it should be you're the best/cheapest or fastest at making the thing.
>>737380237>which is that if something is generated by AI without sufficient human authorship, it’s not copyrightableNo court has said that, though. Courts said that the AI had to be used by a person and that is factually copyrightable. The case where courts ruled against it was an AI self-generating without control.
>>737380226>SCP carefully catalogues making sure no one entity can steal it for themselves>tiktok babbies thought brain rot would be safe since mean internet people just get banned
>>737380226... God, memes have become such fucking garbage.I thought basedjak was the bottom of the barrel but turn out there is an entire underground city under it.
>>737380487>how the fuck did these suits trace it to some random indonesian tiktoker?face recognition
>>737380847who owns the rights to scp?
>>737380226AI art should automatically belong to everyone and be never monetized. It's created based on global cultural interne knowledge, therefore it belong to all of us equally.>b-but it costs someone money to create it!Thanks for their contribution and sacrifice.
>>737380293>yfw the AI company made Pepe
>kikes try not to extract money from something challenge: IMPOSSIBLE
>zoomers want to monetize even their memes>that were fucking ai generated in the first placeholy fucking shit this generation never ceases to amaze me with their retardation, they got sucessfully got me literally rooting for a megacorp instead
>>737380713Precedent determines the extreme majority of law. Courts are focused on maintaining the status quo. Just like how most states have a law saying that if you'd been taking care of property for a decade, then someone can't come and take it with a survey or deed as it is effectively yours now.The strongest case you can make in court is>It already works exactly as we say and thus this is correct
>>737381358>people used to laugh at rare pepes
>>737380487>was already present inside many creator's virtual worldThat's referring to the fact that the character was already widespread when a company bought the rights, the TikToker's video could still be the originReminds me of that time the guy who (allegedly) drew Trollface tried to copyright it
If AI kills jewpyright law then one good thing will have come out of it.
>>737381478is one company being scammed by another with fake ownership claims really gonna set legal precedent?
I saw a youtuber talking about this shit last week. he asked a lawyer and while AI has no right to be legal. it was all under some trademark bs that should not work. You can literally take an AI character and make it into a brand logo so you can start suing people. even if you didn't generate the image or created shit.Is just an issue of the legal system and there's way too many scammers doing it at the moment,
>>737381668i heard about this but never looked into it, how does a guy try to claim ownership over a comic posted on an anonymous forum in 2008
>>737381358zoomers were the first generation born into the system
>>737381358absolute downs syndrome retard take
>>737381478that's a common law thing, which is only in use in british colonies and islamic sharia systemsthe rest of the world uses civil law
>>737381358I remember when we were irked by these guys appearing on t-shirts in 2010
So, let me get this straight. We can create our own AI generated coomslut or brain rot character AND call it our own IP to make money off it and sue whoever uses it for profit if it becomes popular?I was memeing and shit posting in /agdg/ before, but its Time for me to start shlopping more often now.
>>737381834He had it up on his deviantart on his deviantart before it was posted to 4chan supposedly, I think he just gave up on the idea cause everyone called him a faggot
>>737381142this. AI will end copyright laws
>>737382113this has always been bizzare to me>ragefaces get posted here back in the day>some times later normalfags pick it up>4chan stops using it and the meme dies down>wojacks get posted here>some times later normalfags pick it up>4chan doesn't stop using it>some are still posting it
>>737382213not according to US law
>>737382470jaks are a cultural phenomenon it's not comparable
>>737382542it seems like the exact same thing to me. what's the difference?
>>737382664the president uses jaks
>>737382751proof?
>>737382213Just make sure to legally copyright your generated material first, before sharing it.I've already borrowed those pictures of yours and making a game. Thanks for free stuff :)
>>737380226Next time you feel like being creative, don't use AI. Let this be a lesson. AI HAS NO COPYRIGHT. Even if you do use AI at least trace over it.
>>737381358millenisharts are so retarded man i swear, not even gen alpha is as bad as them.
>>737382470Posters went from expressing themselves to trying to constantly oneup one another, and so changed the memes, becoming caricatures representing "this is me strong and smart" and "this is you dumb and smelly".
>>737382213use unfaker.js on aislop pixelart
>>737380226>AI sloppers claiming ownership of shit they didn't make>corporation monetizing shit they didn't makeBoth parties should eat shit and die.
>>737381478>Precedent determines the extreme majority of law.On Anglo shitholes. That's why your consumer rights are piggybacked form the EU legislation.
I hope intellectual property dies in my lifetime. There is no reason we should not combine everything good that we can. And also combine the bad shit like this too.
>>737381025The creator of said work, but it's released under CC 3.0https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/licensing-guideBasically:>You can copy as long as you attribute the creator>Your work has to follow the same copyright as the original (CC 3.0)
>>737383190Jefferson was a commie? Go figure. A real American like Franklin would steal the ideas and patent them, profiting by abusing the law and shitting on both inventors and consumers.
>>737380226Hasn't a court already decided AI is public domain? It's like a monkey taking a picture with a camera. Even if it's you're Camera, you don't own the picture. Because it was the Monkey that took the picture.
>>737381358Ironic to complain about AI generated images when posting a photoshopped image composed of 2 other unoriginal digitally created images.I guess its okay if the software only does most of the work instead of... most of the work.
>>737383326Franklin was fat but you're also wrong. This is slander.>He never patented his inventions; in his autobiography he wrote, "... as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously."
>>737383190I was all for the death of the concept after the abuse I've seen, but I have concerns about slop flooding the industry thanks to AI. Like, on Youtube I have hundreds of channels blacklisted because all of them are just AI voices reading HFY stories about fictional space settings where Humans are notably different/superior to aliens, set to AI generated images and thumbnails, where the stories are either copied from Reddit posts or AI generated.
>>737381358>holy fucking shit this generation never ceases to amaze me with their retardationSame.>they got sucessfully got me literally rooting for a megacorp insteadNo, fuck off.
indonesian kino!
>>737383409Guess I mixed Franklin and Edison. I have Dyslexia please understand.
The absolute state of society, I'm convinced this world is some form of limbo, hell or purgatory
>>737382937Hey retard millenials made this website you're posting on, how about you go back to tiktok or whatever faggy shit you're into now.
>>737383429I understand but think this is a separate concern.It should be legal to create and distribute that stuff, but platforms like YouTube have the right to disallow it arbitrarily.In this specific case YouTube doesn't because it makes them more money from actual retarded babies and auto play.But if they did care and think it was a problem they could remove and prevent it in their ToS, not above them at the legal copyright level.Sharing an anecdote, I participate in a lot of livestreams and if they need to be edited for even a second of copyright the entire chat gets deleted.This really frustrated me since that's basically my own personal history of messages being erased. Like someone ripping photos out of your home album. Gross.>>737383540No worries. I don't know enough about Edison to speak on him.I was more interested in inventors like Pascal, but will maybe read about Edison more when free.
>>737383541>lmao tung tung sahur>NOOOO WE ARE IN HELL AAAAAAH
>>737382910ur getting sued
>>737383190It will continue to exist because it gives people with power more power.
>>737383429yep, i've been in art communities for decades, and almost all of them are dead nowslop infests every single discovery channel, and pushes real artists outif you try to ban them some autist will go all out and spam even harder or ddos the site out of spitethe only one that's still active is a streaming site where people screencast their drawingsit's clear smaller non-public groups is the only way forward
Basically all combinations of possible ideas have been iterated by AI now. There is no new creations left. We are in a post scarcity society.
>>737383802i don't know why someone won't just make a site without algorhitmic slop. i have been waiting for a 4ch alternative for years.
>>737381974becky
>>737380226Americans already figured this one out. Works created solely by AI cannot be copyrighted. Sorry SEAmonkey, you didn't create it, a machine did
>>737383728It's not just the AI generated crap, It's everything nowadays. Stay asleep
>>737382936It is sad things like animutation, made with paint, sprites and windows movie maker are a forgotten form of art and everything is staged tik tok bullshit and instragram tomfoolery.
>>737384109b-But I prompted it really hard!
>>737381142This.>b-but people need to profit, no one will do things for free!!Fandoms have been generating free content for decades now, people don't need money to do what they like.
>>737384110>tung tung sahur>ballerina cappucina>tripi tropiit's... it's everything...
>>737384425Hey about the horrible economy? The endless amount of drug addicts that you see in cities nowadays? The blatant satanism in almost all media? The fact that sexual degeneracy is encouraged everywhere? The fact that you can only become succesful by stepping over others? The endless amounts of greed, pride, lust, gluttony...The fact that unsincere nasty sacks of shit like you and me exist?
>>737384425Oh yeah don't forget about the endless wars anon, a tomahawk missile landing on a school is completely normal in a normal world right
>>737382470Oh that's easy. >wojacks get posted here>some times later normalfags pick it up>4chan doesn't stop using it>some are still posting it>because that's when it became a normal board>all the old fags left and started lives This place is just X with no login.
>>737384025Sexo!
>>737380226Nobody owns it because AI slop cannot be copyrighted.
>>737384123It's really an interesting phenomenon, as soon as people raised lil niggas with phones they all grew up useless. TV was called the "idiot box" but still networks had to put some culture you could absorb, nowadays kids can't watch anything that's longer than 30 seconds so it's only going to get even worse.
>>737384981Zoomers used google and apps for everything, now alphags are using AI for absolute everything, including their "own" opinions.
>>737382751back in my day when old people started using memes that killed the meme
>>737385078>including their "own" opinions.This is the most unsettling of all, i recommended games to my nephew but he said he didn't like them, fast forward a week or so and now he wants desperately play them because a youtuber in a short said so.
>>7373853094chan is full of old people.
>>737385387True, I'm 46 and I'm not even the oldest around. I don't mean the feds that have been monitoring the site since 2008 i mean real users.
>>737382960There are cartoons from 18th century magazines with the thesis "Users of our product are smart. Users of our opponent's product are idiots." or "How you think you look versus how you actually look". It's just human nature.
>>737384981It's being proven every day that kids who are growing up on shortform video can't follow complex storylines. They don't develop empathy from watching fictional characters strugle or be hurt. It's worse than ever now with AI videos delivering plot points at five second intervalls. Us 90s kids grew up with stuff like Spongebob and Ed, Edd and Eddy. But we could follow the plot of a novel. Gen Alpha can't even do that.
>>737385869>tfw 43The "you're here forever" meme is real. Not that there's a good alternative.
>>737385887>posts an extremely rare modern example of advertising trickery>this is just human nature
>>737386223being proven where? link the study
>>737385887Of course it's nothing new, The point was the general change in attitude. People stopped expressing anger or sadness, and started instead exchanging sneers and insults.>sensationalismI like that word a lot. Perfectly encapsulates majority of mass media.
>>737380226nobody doescopyright cannot be legally given to AI generated contentso technically, anyone can LEGALLY copy these characters and do whatever they want with them and face no consequences this was settled at SCOTUS level a while ago, it still baffles me how these companies arent aware
>>737381740nta but yeah, it can.
>>737386307Indeed...
>>737380293>"made"nobody made it, an AI didtherefore it's not legally and cannot be legally owned by anyone
>>737386665the problem now lies that anyone, not even the author of said gens can go to office. register popular slop character as brand logos and start suing people. someone found a loophole and there's no case fighting it atm.
>>737381358That's a symptom of a capitalist fuck you I got mine societyPeople monetize everythingPlaying games? Stream and make money/become pro and make moneyCreating anything, wood, crochet, stitch, paint, etc, make money.Etc etc
>>737380237>because U.S. courts have not yet ruled in favor of any creator’s ownership of content created using large-language models or other generative-AI tools.yes they havelooks like some lawyers are going to get in some trouble for not doing their due diligence on the issueAI generated content copyright is already a settled issue in the courts at the highest level
nothing AI made is copyright protected
>>737386760Sloppers deserve it tbqhfam
>>737380707oh i know this onedisney
>>737386912is not even slopper. is who ever goes to office first. so even megacorpos can steal popular slop.
>>737386879china has mastered this to an insane degreeyou can rent a bf/gf or a whole familyyou can pay to 'go to work' so that you can look like you're employed if you're unemployed the hustle culture over there is on another level
>>737380293The creators of all the assets the AI company stole to make that with*
>>737387014Truly a superior culture.
>>737380780>>737386881Name of case, please?
>>737381358>muhfuggen zoomuhs mayneYeah, I'm sure it's them calling the shots in the kerfuffle, bitchlennial faggot.
>>737387014This isn't what Mao intended
>>737382368Nah, big tech will just cripple their ability to generate copy written content for users while letting themselves go wind with the power.
>>737384597>>737384798that really has a lot to do with this fucking tung tung sahur thread huh
Anyone who claims ownership of this shit gets shot.Especially the server the generated it.
>>737387335*sees picrel**inhales*GUys I...GuysGuys I can't*wheezes*THE ECONOMY*coughts and chortles on own spit*THE DRUG ADDICTS!*shits pants and sets self on fire*FUCKING TUNG TUNG*dies*
>>737386223>>737386409interesting that you talk about low attention spans but then you lack the attention to stay in the thread and post
>>737387139https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-declines-hear-dispute-over-copyrights-ai-generated-material-2026-03-02/the entire concept of copyright is that there has to be a HUMAN author, your cannot copyright something a human did not make>photos taken by animals cannot be copyrighted
>>737384836i don't know why people from twitter keep coming here, the two places are nothing alikefor one i don't have to walk around eggshells while talking here
>>737381142Yup. But I know all these greedy niggers are salivating over the thought of their meme becoming the next skibidi toilet and making them overnight millionaires so they just can't resist the urge to sell it.
>>737387629>>photos taken by animals cannot be copyrightedI remember that case, the issue there was that both the guy who's camera was used to take the photo and some asshole 'animal rights' organization both claimed ownership, so instead of the courts just kicking the animal rights org to the curb, they stripped the photographer of his ownership too, and the lifechanging money that came with it.
>>737387743the issue was that a monkey took the photo, therefore it was not human made and rightfully not given copyright to anyonean animal cannot own a copyright, it is a human made concept to be only given to humans>but muh sob storyboo hoocan't scam the law
>>737380226the supreme court already made it clear that AI generated shit can't be owned because by definition of the copyright act in 1976 it lacks human authorship.
>>737380293I guarantee that in a few years this rhetoric will be used in court and some AI company will own the intellectual property of some small, nobody artist and then start making billions.
>>737386307Even if this places glows more than a Fallout ghoul boss and has enough botposting to make another Facebook, what other website offers this much freedom to say what I want and allows it anonymously, with no sign ups?
>>737387918What if the animal is owned by someone instead of a wild animal? Wouldn't the owner own the copyright too?
>>737384836>>all the old fags left and started livesSadly untrue
>>737388289>Wouldn't the owner own the copyright too?no retarddo you not understand the basic premise of copyright?the PERSON who CREATED the work is given copyright a monkey is not a person, and it cannot be given copyright
>>737386881>>737380780>>737387629i know this case, the court did not make any decision whatsoevermeaning it's still up in the air in regards of AI art being copyrightable
>>737388001they never made that decision they simply refused to make one and called it a day
>>737385869>>737386307Your 40s are hardly old, especially with modern nutrition and medicine. You don't become a senior until 65.
>>737385887>"In your 'bus"Did bus used to be short for something?
>>737388672>>737388735>the court did not make any decision whatsoeverthat's not how it worksthey denied to hear the casemeaning the previous ruling stands as precedent which was a denial of copyrightgo back to school and learn some basic civics
>>737381586Rare Pepes would have been NFTs 3 years ago
>>737388672>>737388735Which means the lower court ruling stands, but the Supreme Court could still take a case on it down the line and overrule them. Or Congress can change the law.
>>737388912Omnibus.
>>737389112I'm pretty sure they're not talking about books, but about means of transportation.
>>737389262
>>737389105even then the lower court ruling only applies to ai generated art that's been made without human input (as that's what the thaler case was about. he created his own personal llm and made it generate art without input), so bringing it up as some kind of win against AI is ultimately retarded
>>737389454>he said nervously Fortnite employee?
>>737389546you are a schizo
>>737388735he's already appealing the decision again, but until then, the copyright office stands by this.
>>737380226I think whoever is responsible should be executed by firing squad on live television.
>>737383909There's no money in it and the weapons of internet warfare have vastly surpassed the common man's capability to defend against them without corporate backing. Even worse, the average user doesn't hate the algorithms even if they think they do. Content that isn't custom tailored to their own comfortable circle is practically invisible to them which is why you see them "complain" about the algorithm, but actually they just mean the content they were shown at the exact moment they're complaining wasn't what they wanted.
I just realized I'm so out of touch I have not only never heard these names I have never even seen these "memes"
>>737389454Wouldn't creating his own LLM count as the human input, then? He decided what info and images to feed to the LLM to get the results he wanted.
>>737383050This poster has the right idea.
>>737389657The guy's Indonesian so that could unironically happen if he turns out to be a drug dealer or something
>>737389912It is literally (I mean literally) ESL third worlder ai crap based on their local culture and then imported into roblox. There is no reason for you to have ever seen it except for the fact that fortnite is currently passing away and is grasping for anything.
>>737389939>>737389454Heck, creating your own personally tailored LLM takes far more effort and work then just writing out a detailed prompt into an already made LLM. Did the court address this, or did they misunderstand the technology?
>>737381358Nothing wrong with monetizing memes it means someone behind them is either a jew or has really good business sense
>>737390028what local culture?are there third worlders telling each other real myths about tung tung sahur and bombardilo crocodilo around the campfire?
>>737390020"Brainrot" does sure sound like the name of a street drug.>>737390104But you repeat yourself.
>>737390351the effects of video game and porn addiction is akin to drugs so i can see social media being infinitely worse on developing minds
>>737390198Not in that literal sense, but in the sense that "tung tung tung sahur" is an onomatopoeic representation of beating a gong or whatever to announce Sahur which is some kind of religiously significant muslim meal. The whole joke is that it's a living gong bat for this specific cultural experience from Indonesia. It has no cultural context for anyone non-muslim and maybe non-Indonesian (I'm not an expert on Islam), it just looks like le funny ai turd
>>737382113For as derivative and cringe as these were, they held an ounze of artistic merit compared to any AI slop. And yet no one claimed their property, it was just weird to see them claimed and milked for money by any business.The AI slop being claimed by corpos is ridiculous too, but any zoomer claiming to be the rightful "author" in their stead should be put in prison.
>>737380428/thread
>>737390198Tung Tung Tung Sahur is an anthropomorphic bat used to beat the drums that announce the Sahur (indonesian meal) time
>>737390557>sahur is some kind of religiously significant muslim mealwhat the FUCK. i had no idea about this. thanks for the info anon, DEEP LORE
So zoomies moved from worshiping Basketball Americans to worship Indonesians?
>>737381358>>zoomers want to monetize even their memesFucking retard. Do you really forget that stuff like the trollface was copyrighted to fuck
>>737390557That is pretty funny. Teenage me would have enjoyed it.
>>737390778it's mostly gen alphas that like shit like tung tung tung sahurand it's more accurate to say that globalized zoomer culture ended up infecting indonesians, who then contributed to the whole unholy movement
Is this thing Indonesia's greatest cultural achievement in gaming? They are so remarkably unremarkable.
>>737381668>>737381834>>737382223>Reminds me of that time the guy who (allegedly) drew Trollface tried to copyright itDid he not? The Wii U eshop game "Meme Run" got removed because of the unlicensed use of Trollface and that removal made gaming headlines a decade ago.
>>737387629AI stuff isn't human created. It's machine created.
>>737391014they did draw trollface and have evidence of it. also I have no idea why people are mad at that guy. he's only gone after slop trying to profit off of it. I bet you if you just asked him permission to use it he'd allow it for no money.
>>737390953>who then contributed to the whole unholy movementso you're saying indonesians are the finns of the modern internet
>>737381142This. Of cours greedy [REDACTED] will say otherwise, attack you and say that they have been victimized.
The Copyright Office's claim wasn't necessarily that AI generated creations cannot be Copyrighted, their claim was that the AI itself cannot be credited as the Copyright owner/creatorIf you, as the person who hit the "generate" button and made the prompt, can Copyright the output, is a separate, unanswered legal question
>>737385869Im 36, tell me anywhere I have the freedom to talk and say what I want with no problems, bans, or negative social effects like 4chan offers. I dont have a discord or X account.
>>737389912I haven't either, you'd expect them to come around. This is all new to me. I haven't seen it. But seems like its just all absurd off the wall shit just to be.
>>737391334>tell me anywherematrix and all of its derivativesaltchansforumstelegraminstagramtiktokIRCTORjust because you don't know it exists doesn't mean it doesn't. *chirp*
>>73739133435 I mean
>>737382470Ragefaces were appropriated by the rest of the internet when the normals started pouring in heaps, and they used them like clueless grandmas who didnt know what an internet was, so they quickly turned lame and cringe.Wojaks have come in a much more lived in internet population, so their use outside of these parts is not that dofferent to begin with anymore. Theres also the fact that wojaks have a melancholic baseline that just holds intergenerationally much better. And well, ragecomics became absolutely horrid and insincere.
>>737390557I thought he was a fucking churro at first. I'm not Mexican, I live in Upper Latin America (the border states)
>>737391143yeah i guess that's a valid comparisonindogs are the tiktok kid equivalent to finns in the 2010s imageboard scene
This is so fucking stupid.You don't own something just because you prompted an ai to generate it. I'm surprised they haven't gotten to putting up laws for AI generated artwork/creations. it should be public domain because even though Mementum Labs/Noxa wanted it and got it, they shouldn't have.In other words, whoever ruled that they should own it are retarded.
>>737380707your post history is not copyrighted though
>>737391640 I remember rage face and troll face getting so popular it was getting put on shirts of every kind for just about everyone. There wouldn't be a day that I didnt see an adult or kid having one on. But they were really associated with reddit, and it being an apparent safer forum.
Millenials have zero reason to whine about zoomer slop, because you thought shit like pic related was the funniest thing ever
>>737392536>meanwhile boomers
>>737392669For me it's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8XeDvKqI4E
>>737391042thanks for repeating what i said
>>737380226Nobody owns AI generated content.However, legally speaking, if somebody DOES manage to somehow own the rights to Tung Tung Whatever, Epic can plead the innocent infringer defense. After all, they licensed the character from a company which claimed ownership of the IP, and claimed to get that licensing from the person who "made" the IP. Thus, if it turns out that somebody else can make a claim over owning the IP instead, Epic can just state that they had (in good faith) attempted to license it from the original source. And if nobody can hold the license, then they're giving a minor amount of money to some random person in exchange to avoid getting their asshairs sued off if somebody wants to be upset about the whole thing.Basically, Epic probably doesn't care who owns the IP, if anybody. They just care they have a legal defense if things go south. It's a CYA sort of defense, not a stance on AI IP rights.
>>737382470There's more nuance than just that. Unironic rage comics became dull and smuggies were used instead. Many people still posted rage comics for a while.For wojak and pepe, there was an attempt to take them back by pushing out poopoopeepee memes and making them associated with the far right.Later on, after the kekistan thing, people moved away from standard pepe to apustaja, tuxedo pepe, gigachad and variantjaks, which were less mainstream at the time.Common pepe was seen as acceptable once again as the others became mainstream.
>>737383747the macaco jirachi will sue you instead
>>737386750>>737380293the prompter made it
>Zoomers are cheating in school using ChatGPT so nobody actually is learning anything.>Zoomers are also using AI for online interviews instead of having the knowledge for the job memorized, the equivalent of an Indian using a fake degree to get the job position.If you thought they were dumb now, it's only going to get alot worse until nobody knows how to do anything leading to a societal collapse.
>>737380758This is how you produce nothing but an endless deluge of derivative slop. It is the death of both creativity and innovation.
>>737382470Culture just changes, look at it from further back rather than just over a 15-20 period.Core /v/ or 4chan perhaps are of a particular age too, so the memes reflect our age and younger people are more fluid while older people are more rigid and unchanging.Lots of crazy spammers basically indoctrinated younger newfags too. Killing a more natural passing down of memes. pic related.
>>737397824Yeah it's happening in real time. They just don't bother to learn anything and assume the AI have all the answers. As some wise guy said in the 3000 BC "society is finally ending for real this time".
>>737380428Agreed.
>>737397824Jobs are also using AI to sort through resumes because every requisition has 100 Sandeeps and Prakash’s applying every hour. You have to adapt to the system or be left behind.
>>737397925True, you're never going to see any new legends rise up anymore like Akira Toriyama, Kentaro Miura, Yoshida. It's all going to be forgettable slop from now on that nobody will give a shit about, even by the people generating it.
>>737397971But also they don't have the attention span to learn anymore anyways. Parents let their kids have digital crack. Tiktok and its consequences have been a disaster for the western world.
>>737398203Tiktok is also AIslop central, my dumbass cousin thinks aliens are real because he saw a bunch of AIslop videos of spacecrafts.
i'm at the point where i loathe everything about this gay world. everything. there isn't a single aspect of this situation that doesn't make me yearn for a meteor to eradicate this hellhole we call a planet
>>737387489
Dead internet theory is becoming a reality.
about slop authorship, what makes it different to photography?The user manipulates a machine that outputs the image. In both cases, the effort involved is minimal (the operation of the machine), yet pictures are attributed to their authors afaik
>>737398547lmao "he stole from real artists" no he didn't, he stole from streaming corporations. That money otherwise wouldn't have gone to artists, it would've gone to shareholders.
>>737398564It's not about effort, the garbage I put into this textbox is technically copyright protected and I definitely don't put effort into writing this shit. It's about it being your own work, rather than a product of shredding and reassembling other peoples work.
>>737398605AI is built from stolen work.
>>737398758piracy is theft.
>>737398758Read you faggot, that is not what the DA is arguing. He's saying that because that fag extracted money from spotify, artists got less. That's just bullshit.
>>737398564>AI niggers still desperately yearning for the same praise as actual skilled people while trying to take the shortcut.KEKAROO!
>>737398880You're retarded, he made hundreds of thousands of slop songs aka he filled up Spotify with an ocean of garbage similar to Jeets throwing all their trash in their rivers and streets.
>>737399026they aren't yearning for it they're just posting out that you're an illogical nigger
>>737398564>what makes it different to photography?Using AI is a lot more artistic.
>>737399026AItards constantly shittalk artists yet yearn to be recognized as such.
>>737398547kek that kinda sucks that he had to pay it back but I guess he shouldn't have been botting on top of the grift
>>737399026p-Prompting takes a lot of effort and talent!
>>737399272I have no idea, I'm not photofag, not slopper. I just see both press a button to get an image from a machine, yet only one gets to claim authorship of that picture
>>737399310>AItards constantly shittalk artistsstop lying. it's the other way around
Is there no reliable way to detect AI works? I imagine theres an invisible watermark that can be detected when it comes to AI art or some header data for music.
>>737399310The funniest one had to be pic related. They tried to trace their slop and still got caught like they always do. You can only fake it for so long like a tranny until people realize you're not the real thing.
>>737399456AIfags always leave AI footprints behind because they have no real experience in what they're actually doing.
>>737399456Some AI companies that want to brand themselves as more "legit" and less harmful have started to push that, but it's not an inherent part of the process so there's always models and programs that leave out that step.Even "showing your work" keeps getting harder because AI is increasingly able to simulate showing its work. You just gotta have experience with feeling out what is and isn't slop. Eventually we'll just lose the ability to tell if something is human slop or AI slop.
>>737399490Got caught with a timelapse piece?
>>737399383I've worked with a professional photographer and I've prompted lots of art and so I can confirm from experience that AI is a significantly better way to express yourself and to create original works. Since you can literally prompt photographs, that should tell you everything about how much more powerful one medium is.>>737399456If there's no watermark you can have AI guess by looking at weird pixel arrangements but AI can technically make non-weird arrangements and fool the systems. I think a lot of it does have watermarks though, I'm not sure if all SAAS have them or not but probably?
>>737399396no point in arguing, those guys are desperate to be victims
>>737399591
>>737399612Delusional, everyone can tell it looks like AIslop at a glance, even children.
>>737399456>Is there no reliable way to detect AI works?no. If a reliable metric for detecting slop existed, models could use that to adjust their outputs and minimize that metric
>>737380758>the Chinese never gave a shit anyway and they're going to be running the planet soonYeah and India will be a superpower by 2018.
>>737399718yeah I bet>>737399725Technically an experienced smart person could reliably detect AI but that's not efficient.
>>737399593They got asked to draw with another artist on magma, they shit bricks and noped out because they can't actually draw. Then they tried to fake a timelapse by chroma keying the color green so the slop they were tracing wouldn't show up. AI bros believe everyone is as stupid as them and they won't catch on but they always get caught.
>>737381478>if you'd been taking care of property for a decade, then someone can't come and take it with a survey or deed as it is effectively yours now.what
>>737399815I wouldn't put it past an AI tranny to use botted followers.
>>737380428>>737380226Most legal experts are taking the position that anything ai generated cannot be copyrighted, however, what if i draw my own character first and then have ai recreate it? Do i own that image?What if i have ai draw mario or spongebob is that public domain?If i write my own lyrics, can i copyright those even if an ai makes a song of it?If an ai recreates a video game with one of pokemons "patented" gameplay ideas, is that an infringement?Can i recreate MJ THRILLER using ai? Legal experts will need to settle this debate before ai completely conquers the arts in the 2040s and permanently replaves all artists and religions for ever and ever. Lol.
>>737399762china is a superpower right now tho>>737399815early slop and certain popular styles are detectable even as a thumbnail. You would have to squint very hard to notice some of the refined slop there is nowadays
>>737399968There's tons of instagram accounts that have 1 million followers with 0 comments on any of their photos, even before AIslop.
>>737390849Yea and everyone condemned it and stop using it
>>737399815>I will send you a guide with instructions
>>737399982All of this is already settled. You own the character you create but cannot copyright the specific pictures made of it. Nintendo owns the likeness to Mario and using it in AI is still a violation of IP rights. You own the lyrics but not the resulting song. Making a video of gameplay mechanics is not a violation of a gameplay patent because no gameplay takes part. Copies of original works that are sufficiently similar to original works, even if deviations are present, are still treated as copyright violantions.
>come up with a character idea>have an artist draw it>still your character>come up with a character idea>have AI draw it>"not your character, chud!!!"
>>737399815>saaar easy 30k/month saar, just PM me and, under any circumstances, do not redeem!
>>737399982>Ideas Guy
>>737400181PAYCLAPARTISTSCLAPWHATCLAPTHEYCLAPARECLAPWORTH
>>737400181If you want to be an artist so bad, pick up a pencil, faggot.
>>737399982Plagiarism already existed before AI, Anon.
>>737400017Lots of people were getting fooled even 3 years ago. Today most people are 90% of the time even in videos.
>>737399591>You just gotta have experience with feeling out what is and isn't slop. Eventually we'll just lose the ability to tell if something is human slop or AI slop.This is the worrying thing though. Theres a certain limit on how much a person can detect if its an AI slop or a real person's work, or just rely on their own instinct. Imagine needing alot of person to review a certain work just to check either its AI work or not.>>737399612>If there's no watermark you can have AI guess by looking at weird pixel arrangements but AI can technically make non-weird arrangements and fool the systems. I think a lot of it does have watermarks though, I'm not sure if all SAAS have them or not but probably?I wish there is within, and a third party scanner can detect them easily. Probability based detection is the best thing we have I guess.>>737399725If the AI corpos just actually put an invisible watermark on their generators, they can have a hand of calling out where a slop is created but its most likely they didn't do it to avoid getting called out when lawsuit time comes.
>>737400181>>have AI draw itStraight from the horses' ass. You didn't draw it, the computer did. Why should you get the credit?
>>737400198No I do not mean ideas guy. In other words.If I took that funny image you posted of Mr. Krabs and had Google Gemini recreate it, is that a violation of copyright?If it is, then what if I make my own original character and draw him myself, then recreate it with AI? Now what. Is that notvthe same scenario as earlier? Lol.
>>737400270So I can be an insufferable faggot like you?Keep your pencil up your ass.
>>737400285The problem with AI detection is that it's not smart so it's looking for weird shit but another AI can remove that same shit just by detecting it with the same software. Simple filters completely break them too, like some film grain or whatever.
>>737400309>Why should you get the credit?The credit for what? The character or the drawing?
>>737400270>pick up a pencilGot one. How does this help to play the piano?
>>737400320You are the one crying about how your AIslop is not seen as heckin' valid.
>>737400319>If I took that funny image you posted of Mr. Krabs and had Google Gemini recreate it, is that a violation of copyright?Yes.> If it is, then what if I make my own original character and draw him myself, then recreate it with AI? Now what. Is that notvthe same scenario as earlier? Lol.No, because you can't violate your own copyright, you fucking retard
>>737400434you're actually retarded, holy shit
>>737400309>You didn't draw it, the computer did.who is using the computer, dumbass?
>>737400472Alright let me explain again.If I cannot generate an ai image of mr krabs, that means it violates viacoms copyright.However, does this also mean that i can copyright ai images of my own original characters? Lol.
>>737400487Guarantee if people had to choose who is the retard, they'd pick the useless AI faggot everytime.
>>737400567it's you
>>737380226isn't the issue just that AI generated stuff isn't copyrightable? so theoretically whoever pulls the trigger first and quickly draws up any AI meme character by hand and submits them to the copyright office would actually get the copyright for that character, right?
>>737400270>artists still wonder why they're hated and no one cares about ai making them homeless
>>737400535>However, does this also mean that i can copyright ai images of my own original characters?No.Because it is easier to violate a copyright than to make something that satisfies the standards for copyrighted works.also man, did you ever notice that 'satisfies' looks like a fake wordI swear I'm not even high, look at that bullshit
So what is stopping me from 1. Drafting a dogshit design for my original character.2. Having AI draw my character with stunning detail.3. Claiming I own the ai image since it is my character and using it in my game?Lol.
>>737400625Nobody hates artists besides AIfags jealous and envious over their real talent.
>>737400671Nothing, actually. You can do that.You still won't own copyright on that AI image, but that doesn't matter because no one else does either. You can totally use it ingame. If you want to steam, you just gotta declare AI usage.
>>737400371A more technical solution is needed, like an invisible watermark or a steganographic data within. Making it a guesswork based on the AI work itself seems impractical and can get worse over time as AI generation gets better.
>>737400605Not really, because the AI meme existed before your claim and the office would find that it's not originated by you
>>737400671Because as soon as you make it into AIslop, everyone will know it's AI and nobody will give a shit about it.
>>737400640I remember when they had "satisfries" at mcds or bk or whatever and it always annoyed me
>>737381736If anything, it'll probably lead to the opposite, somehow.
>>737400270>If you want to be an artist so badWho the fuck wants to be an artist?
>>737400739I sincerely hope you just kill yourself for wanting gay shit like that. But feel safe in that the adobe jews are working towards that hellish future.Just leave it be, art is art it doesn't matter how you make it
>>737400567bad news bud.
>>737400739Won't ever work, because you can't make people add that step to software that uses models to generate images. So you can poison the well for big corporations because you can just force them with laws to do it, but anyone can run that shit on their home computers, and open source projects can't be forced to include anything.
>>737400807>Who the fuck wants to be an artist?AI bros obviously.
>>737400807>he doesn't want to launder moneyPoorfag mentality.
>>737400692you're joking but some people genuinely think like this
>>737400850...no, you retard...?
>>737400837Why do AIfags want to hide the fact that their slop is AI so bad?
>>737400897>>737400912Lmao the cope.
>>737400758so any original characters originating from AI generated content can't be copyrighted at all for the rest of time? what if someone ran an AI 24/7 brute forcing every possible character imaginable and uploaded all of it online? would nobody be able to copyright any characters anymore?
>>737400925Same reason why trannies hide their adam's apple.
>>737400971yeah it's bait
>>737400971>yes everyone DOES want to be an insufferable xitter art tranny like me!!! I'm not the one coping, you are!!!
>>737401014>what if someone ran an AI 24/7 brute forcing every possible character imaginable and uploaded all of it online?possible but trickyyou'd have to prove that whoever made the character used the AI as inspiration, which isnt a given
>>737401014There's more original concepts than you can generateBut technical challenge aside, I think you can argue that if you come up with a 'new' design and the only instance it existed in prior was AI, and you were not aware of that AI version, you still own copyright because AI doesn't.
>>737401154If anyone is the tranny, it's the AIfag pretending to be an artist the same way a tranny pretends to be a woman.
>>737401253TRVKE
>>737400846Unfortunately. Best you can do is mandate the big corpos to add an invisible marker in their generator.But then someone can just take the model, make their own generator and it all comes back to guesswork detection.Dammit, I should be playing vidya, not discussing AI problems.
>>737401529The silver lining is that most people are too stupid to run local models, and the corpos are incentivized to add watermarks to avoid model collapse. So it might turn out not as bad as we fear.
>>737401529>guesswork detectionIf you can't tell by just looking, you're unironically a sub-80 IQ third worlder.
>>737400807I wonder how many retards actually realize that this banana thing, the toilet, and other “art” are basically NFTs for rich people.
>>737401579>implying anyone even uses corpo models>implying websites where people share their stuff don't strip the metadatayou guys really never think
>>737401737Why are you ignoring that there are countless fart huffers that take that shit seriously?
>>737401253Or worse, you have actual trannies trying to catfish with AI pix and AI voice changers.
>>737401757>>implying anyone even uses corpo modelsHave you seen the AI circlejerk threads? The pigs even belittle localfags, calling them poor and stating local is cope
>>737401757Yes? You're too used to being surrounded by people with a smidge of tech knowledge. Most people use corpo models. Most people who use AI have no fucking idea you can use your own. Most people share on spaces that don't scrub shit.
>>737400521>order food from phone.>claims he's the chef.yeah.
>>737401847have you seen the significantly more numerous and faster local threads? dallefags are almost as sad, rare, and irrelevant as drawfags>>737401849where the fuck did you get this idea
>>737401847True, there is no difference between using local and online since they're both going to look like obvious AIslop at the end of the day.
>>737401972I got this idea by interacting with reality outside of 4chanYou live in a bubble. The billions of retards have no fucking clue how anything works, they just consoom.
>>737398564Go take a picture of a storm in the desert just as the lightning strikes majestically against the desolate backdrop. Should be easy for an expert such as yourself, yes?
>>737402080then post evidence of your claims so I can laugh as you can't
>>737401847>Have you seen the AI circlejerk threads?yeah and there's a pretty clear divide between the paid one and the local one, to the point where they have to be on different threads
>>737401737>completely misses the pointThis is what happens when you go to art school instead of going into stem and learning to read.
>>737380226Lmao
>>737380226Anything made by AI should immediately be public domain.
>>737402237All art should be public domain.
>>737402197>AIfag thinks he's a tech guru for clicking the generate button.Thanks for the laugh.
>>737402129That's not really skill or even artistic, it's just perseverance and luck.I've never been one to say photography isn't an art form because it obviously is, but it's such a low form of art, in most cases anyway.
>>737402284>strawmanThanks for proving how retarded artfags are.
>>737402353Can you show me on the doll where the artist touched you?
>>737402515Extremely true.t hates both sides
>>737402553t. candle maker screeching
>>737381358Zoomers are a lost cause. A war is needed to cull them.
>>737402576Yet still more talented than a billion AIfags combined.
>>737380226 Me I own him, where's my money epic?
>early internet>"don't put your face or info online">social media happens, normies put their faces and info online>constantly attention whoring and "creating content" (literal slop)>AI happens>makes normies afraid of putting their faces and info onlineAI is a blessing.
>>737380226Can Epig even handle another large scale lawsuit?When will things get so dire they ""unvault"" all the old battlepass shit in fortnite?
>>737402696>>"don't put your face or info online"Unfortunate that textbooks don't teach you this or basic internet safety nowadays.
>>737402553Trick question, AIfags don't have creative ideas either.
Copyright should just cease to exist, then the problem would be solved.
>"real artists"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvrGJiK9ZjQ
>>737399184Ok and? Human "art" is 90% shit too, they gonna get sued for it I don't think so.
>>737380226i've been keeping it secret all this time, ever since my severe brain damage made me retarded, but.... i invented this character. fort nite has no right to recreate his artistic design. and i'm am sick of artists getting trood upon
>>737403358>>737398880He made thousands of AI songs AND then artificially boosted listenage with bots to rake in as money. The first part isn't illegal, the second part is. That's wire fraud, you silly goose.
>"real artists"
>>737387642Twitter is actually less moderated than 4chan
>some literal who said some stupid shit>yellow press: LEGAL BATTLElel
Sorry about >>737403306, it wasn't the full version, where this amazing artist cuts her pants and fingers herself with dirt and spaghetti o's and pisses in a can in front of everyone.Here's the full version:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T68ilzX-B_0
>>737397925>>737380758>>737399762itll turn everything into blackboxs, which will be nightmarish.
>>737403615This definitely would have been worse if it was genned.
>>737404186Imagine being so insecure about the non-acceptance of AI art that you have to bring up some weird shit an art student did 15 years ago as of avant-garde performance art and drawing are comparable.
>>737404635>avant-gardeIronic shitposting is still shitposting.
>>737397925>meanwhile nintendo is suing companies for having flying monster friendsyou're a fucking retard
>>737380293>madelol
>>737404673Shitposting is a form of art.
if all ai generated content was deleted and it could no longer be generated, which sectors of society would suffer?
>>737404785That's the fucking problem.
>>737387268Mao was, and I mean this sincerely, the biggest retard put into a position of power across all of humanities great fuck ups. He truly was #1
>>737404817Why is it a problem?
>>737380226I spent 10 minutes writting the prompts and another 20 minutes correcting the mistakes the AI made to get the desired result. That's work, that's craftmanship. I guided and instructed the machine, therefore I own it.
>>737402129>get a light sensor and a mobile phone, its really difficult
>>737397824They should do away with homework. They should do away with automated online interviews.
>>737404635>some weird shit an art student did 15 years ago as of avant-garde performance art>"yeah artists have been creating so much slop for so long that they even started categorizing and teaching it, while acting like the gatekeepers of creativity and culture"
>>737405292
>>737405292>while acting like the gatekeepers of creativity and cultureWhat's being gatekept and how? That kind of art does the opposite, it shows anyone can be an artist. The concept of democratizing art is a myth because it's already democratized.
>>737381358>> this generationAlex, i will take what was “can i haz cheeseburger” for 300.
>>737405292>SlopSlop is what AI makes. Human-made stuff is art. >B-but it's gross and weird!Art is art and quality is subjective. Also you're a pussy.
>>737405528It's genuinely terrifying how many retards don't understand that you can make accessible things more accessible. You are a literal retard and your existence is terrifying to me(a human).
>>737405638You can't make them more accessible. They are at max accessibility. There is nothing, and has never been anything, that has stopped you from creating the art you want.
>>737405692>maybe if I just ignore AI making it a trillion times easier to make art... yeah, that will be my argumentretard
>>737405989So it's about accessibility at all then, you just dislike effort. >a trillion times easier to make artMaking? No. Art? No. You're generating images,w
>>737406324the really sad part is that you're just pretending to be retarded
>>737399982The copyright office would allow you to only copyright that parts you made. The other parts they will tell you to fuck off because their argument is that it's as if you are commissioning somebody and taking credit for their work. Pretty based ngl
>artfags: errrrm don't take the lazy way out and pick up a pencil, CHUD, also pay me to make art for youBigly cognitive dissonanceMany such cases
>>737403609Why? Everyone has fake viewers on twitch, youtube, rumble, etc.
>>737406638at no point artist are supposed to draw "for you & for free"what a fucking retard you are. those things are perfectly compatible.
>>737406769And at no point am I supposed not to just train AI on their style and make my own art :)
>>737406769>you should lose money to get art, CHUD>also you should only get it after waiting a month and with a maximum of 2 revisions
>>737406839>suddenly this becomes a commission.nice attempt to move the goalpost. commissions are paid to begin with.
>>737406769this. people should pay to see my posts here and my image macros
>>737407063no one is asking for your posts. you do it for free.keep trying, retard.
>>737399456Nano banana/gemini has built in watermarking that most people wouldn't be aware of, and it's only noticeable on large areas with solid color
>>737380226I'm pretty sure my nigga Tung owns himself.>>737402553And this guy is scared because AI does his work, fast, doesn't complain too much and doesn't have a weird fetish about inserting left-wing views into a story about spaceship wars.
>>737407130people STEAL the memes i make, my man. where do you think this banger came from. nobody ever mentions how lucky i was to get 39 questions wrong in just seconds
>>737407134yeah thats why i ask mine to "zoom out and fill the blank space" so i can just crop it back to the regular size with the watermark outside of the region
>>737407134a lot of ai gens have stuff that's not present in real work. AI sloppers can't edit them out. AI tracers have an easier day but they get caught either way since. they can't fix small details, draw live or do a lot of things actual artist can.
>>737406746If they're botting for ad revenue then that's wire fraud and they can be sued.
Does this nigger not know what GIMP is?>>737407287>AI sloppers can't edit them ou
>>737407256I personally created that image way long ago. nice try.
>>737407339oh yeah what site did the quiz come from
>>737380226I knew the AI retards would eat each other alive eventually
>>737397824Who gives two nigger dicks? Education was heavily slanted against them and moreso the men because sitting down and being obedient turns out to be primary female behaviour therefore women were rewarded for it. Majority of their subjects and majors that were primarily male are being overun by roasties, trannies, and nepobabies in all technical fields uni from stem to CS (With the exception of the great calculus 2 filter).Education in this country has largely been a failure for almost 3 decades, even more after the no child left behind and retarded common core, whole word reading scandals.
>>737407331please don't tell me you believe the only way to know something is AI is because they have a brand watermark.
>>737407381my own. I created the site as well.and sorry I'm not spoon feeding you my work.
>>737407479>>737407381What's this faggy convo?
>>737399026I hope the imposter syndrome hits hard for everyone who abused AI. I can already see the headlines about it.
People should stop being slaves to their own egos and money.
YWNBARA
You might be an anti semite piece of shit, but Palantir will save us.Total identity verification and verified software use history will save us from aislop frauds.
>commissioning an artificial image generator to create an image through a game of telephone somehow makes you the creator of that image and therefore an artistwhat?
>>737407479wrong lol
>>737407531why you wanna get in on it, get in line buddy
using, approving or interacting with AI content is an automatic opt-in for admitting you are in every way subservient and replaceable with an AI agent and thus forfeit all human rights. You don't deserve a job, an AI can do it. You don't deserve a home, an AI doesn't need one. You don't deserve to be listened to: I could just talk to an AI instead. Death to AI users. Magnets and the Loombreakers not Elon and the moonrakers ok? Praise Ludd
Least schizoid anti-AI tard >>737408179
>>737382213You can sue Disney for using Marvel characters right now.
>>737398547>oh mai gawd that guy invented the totally new thing called click fraud idiot
>>737398547>Sony and Disney do itI sleep>random citizen does itFUCKING GLASS HIM FROM ORBIT
>>737408179nobody tell him
>>737402553>this book is great>actually it was written in a very short amount of time>ok I hate it now>this book is terrible>actually it took a lot of time to write >ok I love it now Scenarios dreamt up by the mentally insane.
>>737399184Prove Sabrina Carpenters latest song doesn't use AI generated lyrics.
>>737408078but enough about the human brain
>>737408078>EA thinks it owns the stuff it's employees made lmaobased retard
>>737400605>isn't the issue just that AI generated stuff isn't copyrightable?Why wouldn't it be? Makes no sense for it not to be copyrightable, since you can't definitively prove that something was made with AI or not in a decent amount of cases. The scenario of a bunch of people sitting around going "hmm, this ugly piece of shit would get a copyright if somebody drew it on his computer, but not if the computer drew it itself" sounds unreasonable.
>>737398547thats a pretty good idea. just host a website that automatically generates millions of movie scripts a day, songs, book synopsis. eventually, youll just have every single possible combo of story line, plot, lyric all in one place. every single new movie or anything that comes out, you just find what slop youve generated that its infringing on and sue them.
>>737407382Yeah, AI is finished, now that some people disagree with each other. It's over. What if you are the retard, friend?
>>737404810Manufacturing, electricity and construction would be fucked.
>>737380428True
Copyright shouldn't exist, who gives a fuck. All it does is protect disney and nintendo, no one is copying your shitty OC nigger, you'd be lucky if they did.
>>737407189>And this guy is scared because AI does his work, fast, doesn't complain too much and doesn't have a weird fetish about inserting left-wing views into a story about spaceship wars.Hey, can you give me some job openings for hitlerist graphic designers? Since I lost any kind of possibility for an income due to AI, I would very much like to work in a national socialist company and discuss when the fuhrer will return from Antarctica, thanks.
>>737403648Technically, but it's also more astroturfed than 4chan. So what's it matter what you are allowed to post, if, at the end of the day, Musk decides what you get to see?You won't hear me say this out loud, but Twitter before Musk was actually kind of neat. Not great, but it was a somewhat open forum. Now it's just one guys soapbox.
Ok, easy.Make the character.....then copyright it?The fuck is so hard?Just make the character, DRAW THEM OUT, then put a damn (c) logo and the year and your name!FUCKING DONE!
>>737408603>Why wouldn't it be?Works without human authorship can't legally be copyrighted. >The scenario of a bunch of people sitting around going "hmm, this ugly piece of shit would get a copyright if somebody drew it on his computer, but not if the computer drew it itself" sounds unreasonable.That's completely reasonable. If a person draws something they can copyright it because they're a person. If a computer generated something then who's supposed to copyright it? The computer isn't responsible because it has no agency. The person/persons who prompted it didn't make it so it isn't theirs. The prompt itself can be generated by another machine so any human authorship of an AI-genned work means nothing. The training data uses to get the machine to be able to do that in the first place can't be attributed to any one artist/author/etc.The reasonable solution is anything genned by AI should be public domain. If you can't attribute it to any one person then we can attribute it to everyone as a triumph of humanity itself.
>>737397642This, they had to put the words in, tweak things, etc and get everything JUST RIGHT....like an artist using photoshop or any digital art program....
>>737409285except the prompter made better art
>>737409285>hello. two shawarmas and a sprite.man. being a chef is so hard.
>>737409309>The prompter prompted a machine to generate an image of subjective qualityNo need to thank me, buckaroo.
>>737409285I use AI to generate my prompts actually, much faster and more efficient. Get with the times, old man. Prompting is an obsolete skill.
>>737409481>I usenot even letting the AI generate on it's own non stop?you're getting late.
>you just KNOW if its a.i sloppa!alright lets see ithttps://realitycheckk.replit.app/25
>>737409563I'm not training this filter.nice try.
>>737388098This. This right here.All you babbies don't get it, this site here? Freedom. No login, no forum, no friend list. Just say or post what you want, even things that'd get you banned from 99% of the web, even back in the day.We were a hive of scum and villainy, now? A bastion of what once was, a haven for anyone who wanted to call someone a faggot and not be banned because words "hurt".T. 2004 Dec anon refugee from SA
>>737409641>0%grim
>>737380237>greedy roblox kike wants more money because his game already stole someone else's meme
You niggers told me NFTs were over when infact they just changed their name while being hosed all over the internet. Fuck this shit man.
>>737409641huh? if you can always tell, why would you be worried about training it? its never gonna win, rightright
>>737380428>Anything genre by AI should be automatically entered into the public domain.Best answer.
>>737380428do we also enter everything that someone created after receiving public education?After all, my taxes paid for it
>>737409195If you draw the character then copyright it the new elements added are what you'll be copyrighting because we know the source is ai generated.The AI core design dooms the original creation because the law (in theory) should require human authorship, so the original design is uncopyrightable.All legal systems never accounted for ai creations in the creations of thier law and they're all either vague or specify copyrightable works need to be something made by a human author, the ones that exclude ai did it purely accidentally which is a kind of bullet we needed to dodge as a society desu
>>737409795I can do it. some don't. I'm not helping.
>>737409837lmao this would be nightmarish
>>737381834Have you never read that message at the bottom of this screen?
>>737409864alright so that angle didnt work, gotta ask a different way
>>737382470That's because wojak and pepe are actual cancer that will refuse to die and got worse over time
>>737409886>lmao this would be nightmarishIt isn't, because it destroys the motive for copyright lawsuits. People will use AI for idea storming, then do their copyrighted designs based off it. Its no different than what we already do in the analog world.
>>737397926culture is supposed to change, yesit's just proof how stagnated everything is noweverything is turning fetid instead of changing
>>737409963Your outlook is just narrow and ignorant. The youth will usher in new ages same as always.
>>737409961>jarvis, remake this guys art but change the sunset in the background to a slightly different shadeoh cool its public domain now thanks bruh
>>737410007Wake me up when they stop selling remasters
>>737410007how many more decades will they need?
>>737382470There was a huge war here with basedjaks and it resulted in /qa/ being shut down.They used to spam pepes and wojaks like crazy
>>737409671You're such a baddass on the run anon.
what's preventing from creating original character called DUNG DUNG DUNG ZAHUR with AI?
>>737410040Copyright doesn't work like that you moron.
>>737410345yeah, thats why im making fun of your concept of it lmao
>>737409847No, Hadji, then it belongs to the individual who made it. Not equivalent.
>>737410040Then you get sued and they win, retard. Also AI editing is not the same as genning but you knew that already and pretended not to because throat me..
>>737410451>If reality was identical to my imagination then I'd be the winner right now. Therefore, I win.
>>737410512>it should enter public domain>except it doesntkek
>>737410540and it is
>>737410556A minor color edit doesn't erase copyright and doesn't count as an individual work and also isn't what anyone means by an AI-generated image, you dickless tittysucker.
>>737410151its happening every day gramps
>>737382470A lot of things really, but this one >>737384836 and >>737396470 is what nails it down, not to mention that Wojak posted came from Latin America/Russia
>>737390984It was a different time...https://youtu.be/5qoTI_Uu-mU
>>737410734okay then what level does make it no longer copywritten, lmao . oops oh shit i guess instead of destroying copyright lawsuits you just made them a million fuckin times worse.which would bestarts with nniiiniiiggghhhhtttniiightmmmaaaaa- you can get it! glad we circled back to my original post finally, it was taking a while.
>>737380428It is. It's not regulated, and copyright only applies to human-made creations.You can do whatever you want with AI-genned things and there's nothing anyone can do to you, period.
>>737380293Remember when AI jeets used to say that AI was going to free individuals from corporate control?Look at us now, now they own everything because AI laundered individual ownership rights and nobody knows who owns what.
>>737411267>okay then what level does make it no longer copywrittenWhen it's AI-generated, you retard>destroying copyright lawsuitsWho said anything about doing that? Sue, you'll lose. This shit can't be copyrighted.
>>737399982>Do i own that image?no, so don't use ai to recreate it
>>737411612great, im regenerating your entire movie but every camera angle is 10 degrees to the left>destroying copyright lawsuitslmao can humans really not follow a simple conversational train, grim dude
>>737382470Need to bring back ragefaces
>>737380226>that fucking stick nigger's original creator is an indonesian>children are melting their frontal cortexes over a character created in a 3rd world countryTotal societal death
