Pretty much proves everything Nvidia said is total bs. It also shows how the final result is not at all 'more realistic,' it just looks more like high-contrast photography that AI slop-machine attempts to imitate.}https://x.com/jpn_eagle/status/2095186493547638964
>>746776123Now multiply it by 10
>>746776123>it literally is a brown man wrinkle filterlmao imagine buying an expensive GPU just to turn characters into a burger creature
>>746776123okay andno one with a functioning brain was going to enable this anyway
>>746776123finally! I'm tired of lame low quality real life. Nvidia made the giant leap required to make reality finally realistic
>>746776123It goes back around to making him look like a bloated face-scan of himself.Modern slop graphics are circular and ugliness is the only result at any phase of the circle.
>>746776123Serious question. What did you expect to happen?
>>746776123Wow, it's definitely not a Snapchat filter
>>746776123He went from japanese to korean
>>746776123It turned a thin Japanese man into an older fat faced Indian
>>746776508That's like saying went from English to Welsh
>>746776123it's personalised studio lighting around the face of every character and it looks retarded lmao
>>746776554It also works on backgrounds saving you from using retexture packs
>>746776123It’s crazy how much better it looks on a 3D video game than on a shitty webcam filming a real person. Almost like DLSS 5 wasn’t designed for that…
>>746776123>just a shitty instagram filter to awe the third world rubeskek
the only good use ive seen of it is adding more detailed shadows in the scene
>>746776683It looks exactly the same.
>>746776123woah, he went from shitty to hyper realistic graphics
>>746776750You seem to have mixed up DLSS4 with DLSS5 in that fancy graphic of yours.
>>746776909no i didnt
>>746776123If you needed more proof that this thing changes colors, makes stuff glossy and hallucinates lightning sources where there weren't any, well here it is. It will look fine once devs specifically hand-fix all of these issues though.
>>746776750>>746776943The thread is about DLSS5 and you've attached a graphic that clearly shows tests and a Wiki article about DLSS4/4.5 upscaler. Dummy.
>>746776353Can't wait for the DLSS5 glasses
he's so realistic now. like i could walk by him on the street
>>746777047default preset is trash, natural preset helps video games
Holy shit DLSS looks like that?!
>>746776123>>746776293>>746776353>>746776413>>746776508>>746776537Reminder that Nvidia's AI slop filter makes children look like grown up women. Pedos worldwide riot.
>>746777127that's the point, dlss5 eats up your fps, the base fps will be what's in the image i posted, which would be 135 fps for a game like first light, so you would have to slash that fps in half to use dlss5i dont care about dlss5 this will be usable in two generations
bad product
>>746776123why it make everyone look older?
>>746776123Everyone with more than 3 brain cells already knew that, and the retards and shills defending this shit are just gonna stick their fingers in their ears and ignore it.
>>746777757Because it really ups the contrast. You do the same to a regular photograph and it will make anyone look older. On the other hand, you lower the contrast and the wrinkles become less pronounced.
>>746776123>spend thousands of dollars on a gameing PC>everything is just fake AI bullshit, from the framerate to the graphicsFucking disgusting.
>>746776123>>746776750>>746777568the sad thing is DLSS5 looks good but only on certain games and configs.for example, gta 5 looks like dogshit but fallout 4 looks amazing with it. makes no sense
>>746776123WTF IS THAT REAL?!!?
>>746777980>but fallout 4 looks amazing with itIn screenshots. Looks pretty crap in motion.
>>746777570That DLSS 4.5 performance in the image is fine though, it fails to prove the point you want to make. You just randomly combined DLSS 4.5 performance charts with DLSS 5 comparison pics.
>>746778112>pretty crap in motionyou can thank poor motion vectors for that. for DLSS to work it needs to understand which direction things are going, and for non-dlss / older games you need to install a plugin to 'guess' which is just a poor implementation.apparently they are planning on implementing it into RTX remix and i'll guess that modders will implement it for other games as well. either that or bethesda just drops in DLSS themselves
>>746778187look at the comparisonthis is a 5090 that has similar performance to a 9070 xt at similar graphic settings
>>746778276>similar graphic settings????one is 4k the other is 1440p, are you high?
>>746778347you have to set the dlss to performance (which is 1080p) to get similar performance to a 9070 xt which at quality 1440p is just slightly lower res than dlss 4k performanceyoure mindraped by nvidia
>>746778421Why didn't you compare DLSS at 1440p with FSR at 1440p then?
>>746776123The fact it gave him hag lines has my sides in orbit
>>746778462because graphics are comparable in this setting nvidia's scheduler is fucked and you dont want to admit it
>>746778574These upscalers don't have a linear scale factor like that. It takes more performance overhead to scale from 1080p to 4k than is does to scale from 720p to 1440p, even though both are a scale factor 4* the base render resolution. Simple math would tell you why this is a bullshit comparison.>oh but it's not 1080p for FSR!FSR is somewhere between 720p and 1080p, usually around ~850p, or ~40% away from the target resolution versus DLSS 1080p -> 4k which is 50% away from target.In other words:- DLSS in this case has to upscale by a linear scale factor 2x base res to reach target- FSR in this case only has to scale by a factor of ~1.7xSo FSR is less demanding to run in this instance, it is not an equivalent comparison as the scale factor doesn't match.You are being intentionally misleading by comparing 4k with 1440p upscaling, you would compare a like-for-like 1440p DLSS with 1440p FSR if you wanted to make an honest argument.
>>746778531it's getting to be absurd now. I'm becoming angry at this attack on beauty because uggos feel sad they're ugly
>>746779261i am not being misleading, the graphics are similar with those settings, you dont want to admit that you're paying for an over priced card that doesnt work because of the issue nvidia has with the schedulers on their cardsjust admit it and demand better products from ndivia, stop being an nvigger
>>746779572If you cannot understand basic math behind these resolutions and why that affects performance, I'm wasting my time replying to your retarded bait
>>746779651you do understand that your 5000$ graphics card should have significantly higher FPS than that right? because right now i showed you that your 5000$ card has similar performance to a 650$ cardjust admit you're getting absolutely raped by nvidia please, this is getting ridiculoususing upscalers from 4k shouldnt be that demanding and you know it
>>746779778860p -> 1440p ≠ 1080p -> 2160p
once again /v/ doesn't know how to use new technology
>>746779853yes but you are using a 5000$ card, you cant tell me that having a slightly higher resolution is why your 5090 isnt performing as it shouldyou do understand that you are not getting 6x performance compared to 6x the price you're paying right?can you stop being a nvigger please
>>746780479That's not MSRP, that's the price driven up by AI fags. Plus, I don't use a 5090 I just know bullshit arguments when I see them.
>>746780636it's not a bullshit argument, nvidia's scheduler for their gpu is fucked that's why the performan is so shit compared to the cost (even at msrp)you lost, admit it
>>746780479lmao die poorfag
>>746781448It is a bullshit argument. You were comparing massively different pixel counts throughout.DLSS Performance, 4k target:>base native resolution = 2.07m pixels>target resolution = 8.3m pixelsFSR Quality, 1440p target:>base native resolution = 1.28m pixels>target resolution = 3.7m pixelsThe lower base resolution of FSR in your comparison is already far cheaper to render at raster, but on top of that the scale factor isn't remotely the same and these upscalers are more expensive the higher the target pixel count they need to reach.It is a complete bullshit comparison and you know it which is why you're not even attempting to argue with the math.
>>746776123Using it in irl same as using it 2x.
>>746777862>buy video game>it's just video game>nothing is realgamers wtf....
>>746776123Nvidia has rendering pipeline of real world, AMDjeet. Every RTX card is connected to Akashic Record.
>>746776123on dlss5 he looks like a ps3's yakuza's npc model
>>746776123You need better hardware, his machine is obviously dogshit. I’m getting tired of the disingenuous bitching.
>>746776123from honorary aryan to seamonkey
>>746780479Go be a seething poorfag somewhere else, why even open the thread if you know you can't run modern hardware?At least Steam reviews show the user's hardware unlike /v/ where third-worlders and poor minorities complain and bitch at anything requiring modern hardware.>unoptimized!!!No, get a better computer. Hell, I'm probably responding to some console kid too stupid for a computer.
>>746776123yes, everyone knew dlss5 was an instagram AI filter from the moment it was announced. this isn't anything new.
>>746776123>it's just a Snapchat filterL M A OMAOAI TRANNIES ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>746778421DLSS is just straight up better image quality. There's hundreds of comparisons about it.
>>746782751If it looks good what does it matter what it is. Same with upscaling. If the image looks good then what does it matter that "technically the resolution is smaller".
>>746776123He looks closer to an Okinawan.
>>746783106It's jomonfication filter
i was under the impression DLSS5 used underlying game information like geometry/normals etc. to create the most accurate results. but it turns out its not. without that information to guide it i think it's never going to really look revolutionary. but i guess its impossible to do it this way due to performance limitations.
>>746776123i kind of agree. the left image looks like, well, shitty lighting. games often have shitty lighting. and i don't mean ARTISTICALLY shitty lighting, just shitty lighting situations where the character isn't perfectly lit. DLSS5 takes those situations and makes the lighting look "perfected".everyone who complained about the first DLSS5 preview months ago was correct to a large extent.sure you can fine tune it, but the more you fine tune it, the less the performance hit justifies the cost.and this is coming from someone who can't wait to try DLSS5. i'm just trying to predict the future of this tech, and honestly i'm not convinced it's as game changing as many people think. it's interesting for sure though, and some games will definitely get some real use out of these fucking perfectly lit cinematic face filters.
>>746783361from what i understand, it actually does need the normal buffer texture, which essentially is the geometry
>>746783049It doesn't look good it looks abysmal
BROWN WRINKLE FILTER
>>746782973 dlss and fsr are now similar in quality, youre just coping now>>746781849>>746782581looks like i've hit a nervenvigoyim are truly mind raped animals
>>746784315>4k and 1440p are similar quality
>>746777343ok this one is pretty good, saved
>>746784442>what is upscaler internal resolutionlike i said, youre mind raped
>>746784484>860p and 1080p are similar quality
>>746783813Well it looks good to like 98% of the people. Can't please everyone. Especially the 4chan. To be happy would be content would be fate worse than death.
>>7467846481080p is slightly higher resolution than 860, not x5 higher resolution (the card itself is 5 to 7x the price of 9070xt)
>>746776123Learn what motion vectors are
>>746784809>slightlyit's a 750,000 pixel difference.
can it make me white
>>746785136it does tend to wash everything out, so yes
>>746785123it is not a x5 pixel difference like i saidyou dont even understand the situation, we are comparing a 700$ card to a 5000 $ card, even if we compare msrp prices this is ridiculous, you should demand more from nvidia
>>746776123this completely invalidates all claims made by AIbros. Now watch as they'll completely ignore it lmao
>>746785608price doesn't scale linearly with performance, it rarely ever does regardless of GPU vendor.
>>746785774now coming back to the subject, you have to add the performance penalty of using dlss 5 on the 5000$ graphics card, you get atrocious performance for marginally better graphics
>>746786004I really doubt anyone is going to use DLSS 5 given how shit it looks. I'll stick to DLSS 4.5 thanks
>>746786074Uhhhh why would you use Dlss4.5? Everyone on v says that looks like shit too.
>>746786167>Everyone on v says that looks like shit too.since when?
>>746786167if you are not a gaslighting jewish nvigger, show me the posts in the archives doing that
>>746776123This will be real life in 2017
>>746776123>What if real life were more realistic?!...
What exactly is it about this "technology" that's supposed to generate profit anyway? Companies have poured billions into this crap, and the only use case it seems to have to lose money from rehiring the employees that you tried to replace.
>>746776123>webcam footageMY BOY, vidya is what all true warriors strive for.
>>746788523
