Low tier difficulty settings:
Easy: Germany
Medium: Allies
Hard: Soviets
Nightmare: Japs

You can serve your cunt in hell

>>474218316
Japan is piss easy.

Maus

>>474218326
WOAH-OH-OH.

>>474218362
Reading comprehension

>>474219082
Playing as Japan is piss easy. If you mean fighting Japan I agree.

>>474219371
Japan is the only faction I've never played as because playing against them as Allies was always a one-sided stomp

File: 1702813856203202.gif (2.25 MB, 320x320)

2.25 MB GIF

UPGRADES TO SHOVEL DIG SPEED

UPGRADE PATHS FOR ENGINEER STRUCTURES

STRUCTURES THAT REQUIRE MULTIPLE ENGINEER SQUADS WORKING TOGETHER

DESTRUCTIBLE BUILDINGS

MAKESHIFT REPAIRING DESTROYED BUILDINGS

This post is made by Shovel Gang

I ended up spending 1m setting up Jap BR 2 and 3
I want to cry

>>474220869
I'm glad the ladder creatures are gone

File: buffalo soldier.jpg (94 KB, 1024x685)

94 KB JPG

>>474217551
>there is no thread for like a full day
oh no! it's like the holocaust but for real! jesus please save us from this hell!

Madsen is so ass holy shit.

>>474220869
they'd be wise to combine:
>Bipod fix (IE: you should rest your bipod on windowsills)
AND
>destructable buildings.


they should have building destruction somehow impact score however.. so there's "hesitancy" to do it; like blowing up roads or bridges gets people upset because now they've got to rebuild the bridge when the front changes direction.

>>474224739
I am not

>>474235897
Are you autistic?

>>474243390
They could handle it the same way they handle the blimps on the Airfield.
Destroying bridges, and other tactically relevant structures grands tickets to the attacker.

>like blowing up roads or bridges gets people upset because now they've got to rebuild the bridge when the front changes direction

This would also add a lot of variety to the maps.

>Get 3x Pavesis
>Everyone starts making fun of me cause the Pavesi is shid
>Pavesi is now BR2
Who's laughing now?

Anything labeled BR3 is utterly worthless. Its the lowest end of high tier battle equipment that gets rolled by anything in BR4/BR5. When are the devs going to REMOVE BR3 or make it so its a fun tier to play in. I spend most of the time in BR1/BR2 because its fun and BR4/BR5 if I want to suffer but use cool stuff. Once they change it/remove it they'll stop hemorrhaging players. They even know how bad it is with all this shit moving to BR2 so that people will start using it again. When are they going to admit the BR system is broken/unbalanced and do something to actually fix it?

Weapons having so many stats shown in their window, while tanks don't show anything interesting about their shells bothers me.

>MP717 assault squad
>MKB 42 (W) assault squad with Mondragons
>FN Model 1920 MG squad
>VMP 1926 APC squad
>Krieghoff para squad
>King Tiger tank squad
What are your high tier German squads?

>>474250845
I really saw no point to making a BR III line up, considering I could face BR IV-V, or II.

Not sure how one would change this, so that the player base doesn't get split up again

Anyone else tired of just playing Germany forever? Like I think this may kill the game having literally only 1 usable faction. Like honestly I'm down to getting whatever daily bonus I get and then stopping. I'm already moving on to other games most of the time. It just isnt fun anymore and just suffering on any other faction. It's not even hard on any side, Germany or otherwise, just boring stomps.

>>474254365
It's carthartic, but ends up becoming boring.
Is it really due to the equipment, or is the player base just prone to migrate to whatever faction they perceive to be the strongest?

>>474254365
>Germany is just stomping
>Actually every side is stomping
Thanks for the blogpost faggot

>>474255467
The player base just migrates to what ever is easier.
So right now all the people with an IQ above 2 play Germany and Japan BR2-3-5. The reason they were doing it to begin with is cause Japan got the most stuff in the update and Germany was the first to get it's event squad. This has been exacerbated by the BR adjustment, as Germany had the biggest shift.
If left alone it will redress in about a week or two. You can always play the RU server if you want to play allies.

>>474255535
Illiterate moron; no it's boring cause it's just stomps no matter what side you own, you just get stomped, or are stomping. Play Germany, stomp the Slavs or US. Play US, get stomped by Germany or Japan, play Japan, stomp US, play Slavs, get stomped by Germany. It's never a good, competitive match, just boring stomps. So unless you wana play Germany and get a billionth MP40, StG44, FG42, or MG34 kill, sucks to for you

How would you guys feel like having a team deathmatch game mode.
Like reducing the maps much more and no AI players. Just humans and squads. Like Kahif caves but designed in a way wheter there are more paths and like 3 pits and you cant go out of the holes

File: moscowmybelovedv2.png (420 KB, 948x720)

420 KB PNG

>>474253673
i replaced the zh from 2 sniper squad with mondragons since i have 4

>>474254365
it is fun to play against stacked factions because you end up with really high point games. That is how i grind tunisia when it was the allies PVE experience

>>474255467
It's a bit of both; German mains are psychopath Nazi wannabees living out their fantasies over Germany winning WWII. And the German equipment here is represented incorrectly which is a problem since this game maintains sides, as opposed to like WoT's where just any tank can queue with any tank. The main reason Germany lost WWII was supply chain: too many odd equipment that didnt share enough parts that were inherently difficult to maintain and produce. So for every Tiger or worse, Tiger 2, there were literally 5 to 8 Shermans, and 6 to 9 T34's. But in game, they get a 1:1 ratio; 2 Tiger 2 spawns in and only 2 Sherman 76 can spawn in. This gives them a disproportionate advantage.

Same thing with equipment; reality is FG42's were made in minuscule numbers and few actually reached the troops. Same same for A LOT of German main's mainstay equipment. But Garands? Or Thompsons? Or PPSh41's? Literally 10's of millions. But in game they are treated as equivalent to mid to high tier German equipment when in reality they should be default, low tier stuff.

The result is, is that German equipment gets an inherent 'buff' by being treated in both equal numbers and equal tiers when in reality it was anything but. The best US SMG was standard issue *before* WWII started. The best German SMG fundamentally didnt exist as a mass issue weapon (Kiraly). Same for the Russians; the PPSh-41 was issued to entire Infantry Regiments as early as 43'. The StG44 wasn't even in issue in large circulation until *after* Normandy.

Japan is even worse. You take out all their fantasy equipment and putting together a BR2 lineup becomes an issue: no SMG's, no semi-autos, little to no anti-tank. Basically just Type 99's and 96/99 LMG's. That would be about it. But instead they get their equipment in equal measure to the US which gives them an inherent 'buff' compared to reality.

TLDR: Axis equipment should have usage caps, and/or Allied/Soviet should get major ticket advantages

>>474257905
We have that, it's called Lone Fighters and it was so popular it got moved to custom matches cause nobody played it.

>>474258684
It isn't when every match is a carry. That's not competitive, that's a slog. It forces you to play tryhard instead of just playing the game. It basically turns this into Call of Duty, something I *thought* this game was supposed to be better than.

>>474258423
Interesting what makes you choose Kiraly over the stg series. Also whats uo with all the snipers?

>>474258813
Or you know just make an event that gives stuff just to Mutts and Slavs since weapon balance has nothing to do with faction population.

>>474259058
But it isn't just population. I've been playing Germany basically solely for the last few weeks cause it's a headache to play anything else, and anyone that says the StG44 isn't a straight up cheat is lying to themselves. It trivializes playing against the US ('but-but-but the M2 Carbine!!1!; it doesn't even remotely compare when I can murder and entire team 100 meters away with the StG44 and barely down 1 guy with the M2), and unless you see some SERIOUS stacks from the Soviets, the AS44 doesn't really equal it. Likewise the Tiger 2's, which are more or less immune to anti-tank weapons, other tanks (save 2 meaningfully), and mostly just aircraft. And notably you cannot win a battle with good aircraft alone cause at SOME point you have to get on a cap.

No Germany is straight easymode. I'm playing them every day and there's no 2 ways about it.

>>474259618
I will not take the arguments of someone that runs StGs at BR 5 Germs seriously.

>I'm playing them every day and there's no 2 ways about it.
>Germany is so stacked and OP
>I'm only playing Germany btw
A real free thinker as well. Given enough time or an event that's biased towards the allies it will fix it's self. Because stomps give you no XP. But countering stomps gives you a fuck ton of XP so player stacks that can easily force wins will play Allies to grind.

File: niggers in glass houses s(...).jpg (55 KB, 370x363)

55 KB JPG

>>474244025

>>474259028
>Also whats uo with all the snipers?
i'm trans

AA guns seem like a joke.

>20 Bullets
>Can overheat before firing said twenty bullets
>Gun depression so high that you can't even aim at a plane that's far off, and low in the horizon

I might be one of the few who builds one of these, once in a blue moon.

>>474260860
AA guns are magical. I use them I barely get a kill, Enemy uses them I lose wings, tail and rudder.

File: 21.jpg (52 KB, 469x713)

52 KB JPG

>>474258813
>complains that germany is imbalanced because of supply issues historically
>ignores russian teams with every squad kitted out with smgs and body armor

>>474261136
Do they feel stiff to move around on your end as well?

>>474261651
They seems to have the issue of low skill crews in WT. Where your retard seems more capable of aiming vertically than horizontally so you get staggered aim.

>>474258813
yeah, but enlisted doesn't have a war campaign mode or roleplaying system so every battle is supposed to be THE battle since everyone has a lot of freedom of what to use.

That and production numbers/equipment availability is much more complex than 1 tiger or 2 FG-42 per match, because a soviet soldier that survived the entire Bagration operation would have fought against sperrverbands or feldgendarmerie units with barely any MG support or better AT guns than Pak 37 to stuff like Sturmgrenadiers with 2 mg per squad with a lot of Pak 40 supports, platoons enterally armed with MP43 and German counterattacks with panzergrenadier kampfgruppes supported by Panthers and Tigers.

File: 00sr9wvugzn61.jpg (198 KB, 1080x784)

198 KB JPG

>>474261643
By late war there were more submachines in a squad then rifles. The pps-43 iirc was actually cheaper then a mosin
The body armour bit is true though

File: toptier.png (1.25 MB, 1962x1350)

1.25 MB PNG

>>474259028
it is my moscow experience lineup and the MKb sniper is better than all the Stg 44 but it is suboptimal because snipers squad are in general pretty bad. This is my current "boring" top tier lineup.

I remember this general kept on saying get the MP717 but i've never seen anyone else use it. Like i've never heard of anyone here using since the merge and i've never seen anyone post a pic of it in their loadout

>>474264702
I have them for my tankers and pilots.

>>474257242
Japan BR 2 and 3 is horrible because all their players are in high tier, to such an extent you probably won’t even have a full team
>>474257781
Sounds like a case of skill issue, I have well over 90% win rate on all factions

>>474264278
It’s not better than the StG after they removed the rate of fire upgrade from it

>>474265494
>Japan BR 2 and 3 is horrible because all their players are in high tier, to such an extent you probably won’t even have a full team
Every time I played US BR2 Pacific I had only console scrubs while the Japs had 2-4 piss yellows. Making wining impossible. Now I ain't spending the money to make a BR2 Jap line up right now so maybe it's not as bad as it seems on my end.

>>474259618
The AS-44 is a straight upgrade over the StG

The one good thing about playing on console and having crossplay off. Is that every premium/gold weapon is viable due to how bad they are. Want to use the silenced M3, go right ahead

>>474258813
>The best US SMG was standard issue *before* WWII started.
What

I just witnessed people placing the bomb on the objective through the floor on Lehrter Bahnhof. The objective located in the underpass.

I think it was done by bots though, since we absolutely littered every entrance with barbed wire

>>474266425
The M1928A1 w/ 50 round drum was in common issue in 1932 in the Marines and US Army. The 1921/28 in 28 by the Navy/Marines.

>>474261643
>>474261643
The body armor is bullshit but the smgs are not. The Soviets literally had entire regiments armed with just PPSh41s and Dp27s. The soviets went in 100% on the SMG concept, way more than anyone else.

Also I rarely actually see the body armor. I think it's more of a sour grapes meme from German mains than anything real.

>>474262081
But the balance quality is still heavily biasest towards Germany. Had they been able to make Panthers and Tiger 2s at the rate of Sherman's, or had entire brigades outfitted with MP44s the war likely would have ended in a 1918 style armistice rather than surrender and occupation.

The fact is they are currently balancing the StG44 and FG42, two weapons that were fielded in small numbers and had MAJOR reliability issues against weapons fielded far ealier in the war and in infinitely more numerous numbers. To say nothing of the game accounting for actual *problems* with german equipment (reliability, parts, complexity of maintenance ect) all things the Allies equipment was infinitely better at (you kinda can't kill a PPsh41).

Basically the Germans had overpowered weapons in reality but their inability to field them in numbers made the equipment advantage meaningless, whereas in this game, by circumventing the equipment disparity in numbers allows rhe quality difference to shine through and create a major balance issue.

>>474267247
Except the first ones were all M21/28s. I can’t find anything confirming significant numbers of them prior to WW2.

>>474268560
I hope you realize that your manufacutring count argument falls flat on it's face when US uses guns that were either post war or only saw combat on Okinawa while Russia uses Guns that weren't available in sufficient numbers to be fielded by the time WW2 began or are post war Prototypes they made 6 of.

File: German sturmgewehr.png (45 KB, 1755x256)

45 KB PNG

>>474265690
They have the same rof while the Mkb has better dispersion than the StG. Technically speaking the best German AR is the sniper StG but have a ton of maxed Mkb from Moscow.

>>474268763
The Navy (and by extension the Marines) created in a real sense the 21/28 overstamp. The 28A1s were slightly modified and issued with drums and saw issuance starting in 1931 and was the standard issue SMG by 32 with about 25k units in service by 33. The confusion as to where all were is that during lend lease, a significant portion of that stockpile was sold to the USSR and British, as the US was already working on replacement programs in the form of the M1, M2, M3 SMGs AND the light rifle program, all of which were (hoped) to be in place before the USs inevitable entry to WWII.

Long story short, the 1928 either in overstamp or A1 varient should be the starting US smg, not the M3 or Reising.

>>474270110
Was their pre-nerf rof over 700 then? I can’t remember.
Anyway, it also has worse recoil and unless something’s changed since I last used it then the scope is never aligned with your full auto fire and you actually aim with tracers

>>474268835
There are *two* US guns that qualify for that argument: the M2, which I agree is dumb and at best should have been a Gold order gun, and the 1919a6, which at least as a stocked gun is fair, although it's worth keeping in mind the a2 varient was the standard issue by 38 and would have to just work as a sort of deployable or movement restricted gun, although seeing as they already let a 50 kg anti tank tank rifle be carried and fired from the shoulder I feel that isn't a huge leap.
Otherwise, the Germans should by and large *only* have krieg mausers and mp40s in most cases, while the US should *default* at Br1 with M1 Garands, as only Marines (and not all of them) were initially issued with 03 springfields in 41.

There is no valid argument to how the balancing of German weapons work in the game as it predisposed best case issuance for Germans (good quality Mausers at low tier, Assault rifles at high tier) while worst case for Allies (03 springfields and no PPShs at Br1).

>>474272116
Nigger the entire defense of the Philippines was conducted with Springfields

>>474268560
Stg and panthers were pretty common by the end of the war. Panther production outpaced Panzer IV production by mid to late 1944.
Like i said before since this game doesn't fully represent a particular battle, both sides are equipped with the best possible shit because it is player dependant which is why at top tier is full of FG-42, M2 carbines, Fedorov and funnily enough the most available tier 5 weapon in real life aside the PPsh might be the Stg

>>474272116
No nigger,
M1D Garand was made after the war
M1C Only saw service on Okinawa
M2 Carbie same
M1919A6 was more common than the M1941 LMG Johnson
The Reising was ditched after Guadalcanal
M1918 BAR, M1917 and P14, Ross never saw service during WW2

>There is no valid argument to how the balancing of German weapons work in the game as it predisposed best case issuance for Germans
The argument is that it's a videogame not some autistic Bolt Action derivative you absolute goober. Your brain dead take about muh production is just seeping with seething.

>>474272547
1) it wasnt; tons of A1 Thompsons, BARs were present as most of those had been in inventory for more than 10 years and
2) there were tons of Garands in the Philippines in 41/42, they were in front line issuance by 39, and the Philippines were as front line as you got: that's the main reason the Marines on Guadalcanal famously started with 03 springfields: they were themselves replacements/new volunteers and/or second line troops who had not yet been issued M1s and what m1s the Marines had were all captured in the Philippines

>>474272116
nigger the entire top tier is full of shit that was pretty uncommon even at BR IV. And a lot of the most common weapons of the war are at BR III, so if you really want to be cucked by muh production numbers roleplay go play HLL/Squad and be stuck in normal ass rifleman because most clans or friend groups hog all the vehicles and specialist slots.

>>474273269
Mac Arthur requested Garands and didn't receive shit. Most of his troops still had WW1 Era M1917s. The Highest tech weapon on the Philipines campaign were 1928 Tommy Guns.

>>474272551
>Panther production outpaced Panzer IV production by mid to late 1944
Misrepresentation of facts: Panzer 4 production was winding down for 1943, so production numbers equaded to Panthers not because Panthers were being made in massive numbers but rather because Panzer 4s were winding down. Panther production never matched peak Panzer 4 production. Not even for 1 month.

And StG production numbers are likewise misrepresentative as they don't account for the staggeringly high failure rate after about a 1000 rounds causing the stamped recievers to literally bend themselves open.

Let's be clear: the StG was a fascinating, ground breaking weapon that basically influenced most designs that followed: but as a gun taken on its own merits it was a TERRIBLE rifle with massive problems, as is often the case on a 'new' concept.

>>474273798
>Let's be clear: the StG was a fascinating, ground breaking weapon that basically influenced most designs that followed: but as a gun taken on its own merits it was a TERRIBLE rifle with massive problems, as is often the case on a 'new' concept.
I thought you canceled the StG video Lazerpig?

>>474273607
It's not? The aforementioned Thompsons were in common issuance from the 30s, the Johnstons were in issuance in 41 and used in Guadalcanal in the first operation and landing, including the lmg. The M2 mortar was the standard mortar, as was the m2 flamethrower (the m1 and m1a1 barely saw use). And the Sherman's were made in total numbers higher than panther, tiger and tiger 2 production combined. Pershings were rare but did see combat at least in Europe to middling success. So idk wtf you're talking about when only like, 1500 total FG42s were made, and most of those never issued.

>>474274315
>the Johnstons were in issuance in 41 and used in Guadalcanal in the first operation and landing
They were only used by the Para Marines on Guadalcanal. Which were a single division and only part of it was deployed there, only 100k were made and a lot of them were not given to the USMC but rather to the dutch. The Johnson was rarer than the Tommy gun or Grease gun.
>and most of those never issued.
Why are you lying?

>>474273640
Except he did? He didn't get enough. Clearly. But Garands were present in 42 in the Philippines as it was primarily Army units, and the Army had near universal issuance by 41 of Garands to Frontline troops.

>>474274579
>the USMC but rather to the dutch.
Who then sold them back to the USMC. Ian did a separate video just on the Dutch Johnsons.

Same goes for the FG42; read the book he cited; only about 500 FG42s were actually in the hands of combat units. The rest sat in crates

>>474274315
>1500 total FG42s were made
It was over 7000 you lying nigger

>>474274587
You do realize a lot of those Army units were garrison forces not reinforcements from the mainland and the Philippines was last pick for equipment. All US forces there still have Tommy helmets.

>>474273798
wow i though your kind was contained in warthunder and discords. Most Stg problems were fault of being made by literal slaves that hated germany, lack of materials and factories being bombed 24/7.

>>474274810
>Ian
Maybe quote a real historian.
>Who then sold them back to the USMC
Not all of them went to the USMC a lot went to the Dutch east indies after they were liberated.

>>474274857
Lol you're arguing with the wrong person: stamped recievers without barrels, fire control units, springs, stocks, or anything else does not COUNT as a rifle. 1500 completed rifles were made, about 8000 recievers.

I really want proximity voice chat.
Imagine you're playing and you hear the sky playing the Fallschirmjager remix or Blood on the Risers, or a T-34 goes flying by playing Russian Hardbass

>>474274315
i am only talking about weapons nigger and yes you are right about that the Thompson they were pretty common IRL compared to most soviet weapons, but no one use them even at BR III so i don't think you even play the fucking game.

>>474275118
It was that for sure too, but as a design it isn't great. I'll put it like this: I'd sooner, today, take a type 2 Ak47 or SP1 over an StG.

Innovative =/= quality

>>474275159
He's literally written books on the topic and you... haven't even bothered to read them so he's an actual source and you're a naziboo

ian isn't a source, karl

>>474275991
He actually is. Just cause you're biased doesn't actually invalidate someone actually getting published.

>>474275853
>He's literally written books on the topic and you
HE'S WRITTEN COFFEE BOOKS YOU MIDWIT
IF YOU TRY AND QUOTE IAN AS A FUCKING SOURCE IN A HISTORICAL PIECE YOU WILL BE LAUGHED AT
Now ape I want you to show me proof of M1 Garands in the Philipines, or that only 500 FG42s were issued. Or that the StG is a giant pile of shit, considering the soviets gave it out as aid 30 years after the war was over.

File: fg42.png (30 KB, 999x613)

30 KB PNG

i don't give a fuck that he was published. he's fallen in love with his own cringey image and has started to believe he really is enough of a historical authority that he can just infer things when he's missing information and pass it off as fact

File: v2.gif (410 KB, 1040x648)

410 KB GIF

>>474276294
Literally a picture m1s with the Batan bastards

Just cause you're making shit up to fit you're naziboo narrative doesn't mean anyone else has to

>>474276294
>considering the soviets gave it out as aid 30 years after the war was over

yeah because it was shit, otherwise they'd have sold them for hard currency

>>474276534
Oh boi one picture. I have hundreds of pictures of M1917s. Show me actual data to how many were in the Philipines.

>>474276294
Death from Above The German FG42 Paratroop Rifle is the source on production numbers; of about 8000 recievers only about 1500 were put in complete rifles l, of which only about 500 made it into combat unit hands. We know this because the rest were gobbled up by post war R&D to develop copies of their own.

File: 1633051148050.png (1.92 MB, 1774x882)

1.92 MB PNG

How far did you guys get?

>>474276705
Are you familiar with moving the goal? They were in the Philippines, plane and simple, and in no fewer numbers than the fucking zf4 scoped stgs were that ever actually existed.

>>474277191
> and in no fewer numbers than the fucking zf4 scoped stgs were that ever actually existed.
You were claiming that it should be the default fucking weapon at BR 1 for mutts. And now that you are facing push backs you are crying about muh germs again.
God you are a pathetic little faggot. Besides crying about wheraboos and inventing allied fiction do you actually have anything of value?

>>474277473
It should be. Considering that vs. The Germans the US is starting in North Africa and fucking Normandy, it should start with M1s not Springfields. There's a SLIGHT argument to be made that the Marine units in Guadalcanal should start with Springfields (although by the same token they should start with 28A1 Thompsons on Assault 2s) but even there, by Henderson Field, M1 Garands were standard and M1903s had been phased out to second line troops.

I swear wehrboos are the worst. The worst sore losers I've ever seen.

>>474277845
Where are my BR 1 MG-34s?

>>474277845
>I swear wehrboos are the worst. The worst sore losers I've ever seen.
For all your crying about wherraboos I have more battles with US than Germany. I just find your little baby cries and pathetic attempts at stringing together cope line ups insulting. Especially since you use only double logic.

How many Ho-Ri Production did Japs produce in total?

>>474273798
>Misrepresentation of facts: Panzer 4 production was winding down for 1943, so production numbers equaded to Panthers not because Panthers were being made in massive numbers but rather because Panzer 4s were winding down. Panther production never matched peak Panzer 4 production. Not even for 1 month.
lol do you even read or think what you write?
First if we are talking about chassis during 1944 more Panzer IV were made than ever before, if we are talking purely about the tank (F2, G, H and J) 1944 and 1943 productions are pretty similar with 1944 being ahead by a 1 or 2 hundreds. But if we compare only the tank (no spg or jagdpanzer) production of the Panzer IV and Panther more Panthers were made in 1944. Since it seems you love YouTube look military history visualized and its last video of the panzer iv not being the actual Workhorse of the Wehrmacht. That video not only talks about production numbers which you love but also their actual use in companies and battlefield availability.

>>474278162
Must be a lot if they have to clarify that it's the production model

>>474278162
As many as the Americans made M1Ds and just a few less than the soviets made AS-44s

>>474277014
I ate shit on wave 27
we were doing great but forgot about the paratroopers

>>474275853
by wartime 40s standard there was no particular design problems to call it a failure or a reliability mess.

>>474277014
33

>>474261136
Not sure if theres any truth to it, but burger planes feel much more resilient against AA, while kraut and slav planes may as well be paper planes

>>474280072
IL-2 and 10s are basically light tanks

>>474280072
It feels that way. Hand held mg fire brings down Jap planes. But it doesn't do much to US troops.

>>474280072
I think it's just random, the last few jap matches I managed to shot down P-47s in 1-3 hits each.

>>474280904
https://files.catbox.moe/7g1f7y.mp4

I only play germany at the moment because I'm just grinding to unlock all their trash
just the H1 and some planes I'll never use and then I'm finally done

I wish I could play a faction other than the krauts. They are overpowered as fuck.

>>474285105
i said it before now it is the best time to carry the allies just play BR II or III if you are confident enough

>>474288229
Carry's are boring. Whole lot of work for same shitty Silver payout. Already have max XP on every faction and everything unlocked so playing for fun, isn't, on anyone but the kruats. Plus they are straight overpowered at baseline.

>>474288634
>playing is boring.
idk man maybe play some gungames or some shit like that on customs.

are apc even working? i couldn't spawn from my sdkfz 251

>>474294793
Are you sure it was yours? There's a glitch where you see enemy APCs on your spawn screen and can select them, but obviously can't spawn on them.
Alternatively, was some retard not getting out of the vehicle? It's a bad idea to leave an APC that has weapons facing the objective, because it might encourage some retard that just spawned on it to shoot at the objective, which blocks other people from spawning on it until they get out.

>>474296295
not him but sometimes APCs just don't work, sometimes APCs don't get destroyed in the gray zone, sometimes APCs *do* work but their spawn icon is on an enemy APC rather than your APC, and sometimes they show as functional but are actually destroyed

APCs are a bit funky

what is the best pistol

>>474277014
16, most of the times it was a bomb.
There was always one guy who stood to the left of the trenches, instead of grouping up on the two bridges and funneling them all in a straight line, which always ended up with a few zombies getting through and hitting us in the back

>>474296295
I wonder what they were thinking when they decided to lock the APCs when some squad is in them.

Or why I still have to fill squads that I don't plan using with soldiers.

>>474301814
Schnellfeurer, Schwartz, Artillery Luger, Voevodin.
For purchasable pistols, it's the Hi-Power

>>474277014
83. It took us 4 hours.

>>474306709
wow. i bet your aimbots were overheating by the time you got that far

>>474306709
would have gotten to 88 if you took me, i had more kills than merc the first game

>>474218326
woof

APCs really revitalised the train APC. Bring 3 of them to cycle and the enemy team stands no chance

>He doesnt have premium BARs you can put on any squad

>>474331553
Did you mean to write "the train mode"?

>>474333487
Shit yeah lol

>>474333827
>>>/whiggers/

>>474333827
tell ya what
if they do an ace combat, lost planet, resident evil, or final fantasy crossover and pull any of them off, enlisted will be gotyay

File: Soviet_tankmen_of_the_6th(...).jpg (121 KB, 800x545)

121 KB JPG

Invasion of Iran maps would be so cool. Literally no other games that I know have shown it.

>>474337970
I'd love to see lesser known battlefields but who knows if enlisted will last long enough to realize them

why is the SOC-1's rear turret 1919 so small

Man fuck pilots on console.
They never get any kills in low tier just fly about in their imaginery dogfights before suiciding (costing us tickets) and the minute they can fly again they do it.
The only times i've seen them be "good" is when they use outragiously OP vehicles like the rocket planes that used to be on Normandy

>Get 7 tank kills
>over 100 kills
>Over 20 engineer uses (I used a APC too)
>Barely over 2000 silver
Its like they want this game to die desu

>play germoney twice
>enemy american team is practically nothing but privates
uh

>>474345996
if you're new, your first two matches are against bots and maybe other players also on their first two matches

>>474347601
unfortunately, I am not new
you'd think america would be in full swing now that their BR2 lineup is objectively the strongest at the moment

>>474257905
tdm could be fun on smaller maps. I wouldn't mind if they kept squads but limited armor to 1 tank each side like in world at war.

>>474348330
Only non premiums that got reduced are the worst BAR and a bolt action.

>>474355573
they got the enfields at BR2
with them, the bazooka, the lanchester, and the ross they're basically #1 at BR2

>Switch server the RU
>Insta quit all Pacific matches
>Insta quit all instant MM games
>Insta quit any match where the enemy team has more decorators
By just quitting 6 matches in a row I can actually play US now.

>>474355573
>worst bar got reduced
?

>>474356546
Soviets are still better

>>474365019
>No semi auto
>Worst MG
>Shit tanks

>>474355573
The BAR didn't get reduced. Only non premium in that br was the two Lee's. And changing two bolt actions does not turn the hardest low BR faction to play, to the best. The germoids still get the best br2 and br3

>>474357725
The US/Western Allies are hard mode
Soviets, Medium Difficulty, hard at high tier
Germany and Japan easy mode, literally insta wins by just queuing. Japan now has an AR equitable by everyone but Assaulters and Germany has the best equipment at every tier.

Will silenced mp40s come back?

File: Screenshot_20240420-14254(...).jpg (249 KB, 1280x720)

249 KB JPG

>>474374086
They said they would bring back old premiums and during an old video off the Enlisted YT channel had this during the video

>>474372484
>germans
>best BR2
lol
MP40 and beretta M1 are good, but the lanchester and owen are also good
no1mk3 and no4mk1 are the best bolt-action rifles in the game(except maybe the trench 98k I guess but lol)
krauts get the pz III N and IV E/F1 but the burgers get the M3 lee/grant and the M8 scott
german AT is actually quite good but is a pain in the ass to use, the M1 bazooka is fantastic for BR1-3
the UC is objectively the best APC, and the studebaker is the best tech tree APC, both are BR2 while the stummel is BR3

japan used to have the best BR2(even if retards believe it didn't) but now that the burgers get enfields at BR2 it's over for them

>>474377034
Maybe instead of gaslighting you should actually play BR2 to show everyone how good allies are.

>>474383241
mashallah maybe I will

>>474383380
turns out console players are a liability

I think the MG13 premium squad might be my favorite in the entire game. Great gun, great /fa/ and great emblem. They used to slap hard in Moscow too, good times.

>>474345863
This is anti-semitic.
How dare you ask for 3000 silver just for playing in a match.
Do you think you deserve 5000 silver just for reaching 1st place in a match?
These 10000 silver don't grow on trees.
You'll hear about my lawyer about those 10 Gold weapon orders you still owe me.

Enjoy your 1000 silver for killing 5000 enemies on an objective

When I make my BR2 Jap line up it will be full larp.
Only SMGs will be one premium Type 100 squad. 2 Rifle squads with apropriate loadouts of Type 38s and Type 11 or Type 99s and 97s. An AT squad with Type 97 AT cannons. An Engie squads with Type Is. Tank squad is gonna be a Ke-Ni in SLDF paint and the crew will only get the poopy pistol.

>>474396704
Why would you do that?

AA buff now

I was just in a match with a bunch of PC players, they played in such a lethargic way. There were also a bunch of sniping niggers miles away from the objective.

Is this a common experience for pc players? They were Soviets.

>>474408678
it's mostly habit because "why bother trying to play the objective" when your team is going to typically suck ass, never communicate, and get stomped by a bunch of aimbotting g*rmin.

>>474341375
why are you flying a shit-tier aircraft?

>>474408678
If it was Stalingrad, everyone turns into a wannabe Vasily Zaitsev larper faggot that snipes from a building in the grey zone all game

HEY, HABT IHR NOCH MUNI?

File: stug.png (3.91 MB, 1920x1080)

3.91 MB PNG

so what happens after premium ends? does the decal on the extra slots stay?

File: Enlisted Screenshot 2023.(...).png (3.38 MB, 1886x1108)

3.38 MB PNG

>>474438519
I think they stay, like the extra slots purchased while you have premium. I've never ran out of premium though so I don't know for sure.

Komet

Maus

Is there anywhere you can play Soviets or US? Cause it sure seems like you can play germans or japs or nothing.

>>474465952
Nope, just Kruats and Japs. Until they either nerf them, or the game basically kills itself the exact same way HaG did.

>>474465952
US and Soviets low BR. Alternatively try Europe or Russian servers. Also you could git gud at carrying

>>474465952
The soviets matches I played were fine. Mutts are just crying about getting shitstomped like the germans will when everyone flips sides again.

>>474465952
>>474466329
>>474466416
You basically have to play low tier as the US or Soviets, top tier is a mess.

>>474467967
Where and when? I've tried every server and they are total fucking slogs.

Playing US or Soviets at any tier is really just awful, isn't it? Look at the console player who has 4 kills and TEN deaths.

File: 1705286682553562.jpg (184 KB, 1437x591)

184 KB JPG

>>474469920
Forgot my picture, of course. The teams are so fucking passive.

File: 1704505391604594.jpg (887 KB, 1920x1080)

887 KB JPG

>>474470139
This guy built a whole trench system off the side of the map 150 meters from the point.

>>474470367
based

>>474470367
SHOVEL GANG

Is there anything smaller peen than a br3 German player? No there is not

>>474478948
BR III is, in a vacuum, the most balanced BR. It's a shame it's unplayable unless you play Germans.

>Play BR3 Germans
>Desert everything above BR3
>Play everything below BR3
>Greyzone with my Panzer IV J

yep it's gaming time

>>474479747
Small peen zone activate

File: Enlisted Screenshot 2024.(...).png (3.51 MB, 1260x1305)

3.51 MB PNG

>>474479747
based

File: paratrooper.webm (3.62 MB, 1280x720)

3.62 MB WEBM

the fucking germoids disabled my gravity allies are unplayable they must be nerfed

When do I get my ME-262

>Play Germans
>Enemy team gets stomped horribly
>They can barely fight back
>Win with ease
Man, this game is gonna die soon.

File: header.jpg (35 KB, 460x215)

35 KB JPG

Retvrn

metafags killing the game, sad!

>>474489612
It's not even "metafags", it's just that everyone with a brain is swapping to Germany because everyone is swapping to Germany.

>>474489653
that's literally meta
I don't even know why
like 2 months ago everyone was doomposting about germany being a lost cause and completely unbalanced and never able to recover

>>474490669
It's momentum from the event squads, I think. A bunch of people swapped to Germany to play their shiny new event Engineers, which lead to German teams stomping, which lead to people swapping to Germany.

>like 2 months ago everyone was doomposting about germany being a lost cause and completely unbalanced and never able to recover
Germany was getting shitter shattered because they had their crutches taken away. They stopped having bonus tickets and quicker caps, which lead to the teams just absolutely shitting the bed for a while since they were used to having special privileges in every campaign besides Shitmandy.

>>474490786
They were always defending in Berlin and they needed the bonuses in every campaign other than Normandy
>t. Normandy main

>>474490915
>t. Normandy main
My condolences

>>474490915
Even if they were always defending, the Soviets still took twice as long to cap things and got fewer tickets when they did, which gave the Germans a huge advantage. I don't think they really "needed" the bonuses at all and it was always a really stupid way of balancing the game and lead to shit like the Americans capping points in Normandy in like 10 seconds and getting 400 tickets back.

>>474491006
German players in Normandy were, for a time, the absolute worst players in the game. Some of them were mechanically competent, but they absolutely refused to get on the point and were so obsessed with using the mounted MGs that they would forego all other strategies and notions in order to sit on them while the point was capped. Leveling the Normandy Germans was fucking awful.

>>474491006
It was fun, with the gear advantage I could hard carry matches and rack up huge scores

>>474491006
tfw only played allies normandy until tunisia
tfw only played axis tunisia once tunisia dropped so I got to suffer the constant waves of populated teams vs bot teams

>the issue that the merge was supposed to solve still exists for some reason

>>474491756
They need to actually have one or two retards in charge of MM balancing. They need to black hole over poped teams. Bias under pop teams to be defending, extra points if they are defending assault maps. Add tasks and boosters for under pop teams. They just need to have someone looking at the number and adjusting stuff on the fly. It will probably normalize on it's own or with another event but they need to take precautions so this shit doesn't happen.

>>474496768
Simply adding a bonus to queuing for all factions would be huge

File: 1711310576999373.png (21 KB, 58x552)

21 KB PNG

Soviets.

the next battlepass is coming
things will change

>>474500227
Japs will get a BR V plasma rifle

File: 452401201_K47_Japanese-Lo(...).jpg (279 KB, 2048x2048)

279 KB JPG

Coming to BR3

>>474489125
I refuse to spend another cent in this game as it already feels like I wasted money on any premium that isn't german or jap. And I doubt that I'm the only one and that pretty much kills a ftp game like this.

How is the Gerat 03 as a premium squad? I don't really like the FG-42

>>474505739
And said weeaboo mains will complain it should be no higher than BR3 since the US still has a plane with rockets and the M2

>>474507008
soon

File: untitled3.png (202 KB, 786x911)

202 KB PNG

Does anyone remember what campaign had the Mosin m1938 carbine (D)? I have a bunch of these rifles and they're almost the same (slightly longer reload) as the Mosin M44 carbine, despite only being a 3* weapon. Seems like I can't buy more of them, which is a shame.

>>474517652
Shittingrad and Berlin

>>474508219
Bad

Do-335

>>474508219
They’re decent, but semi autos at 4+ BR are just overshadowed by automatic rifles

>>474496768
the MM just keeps getting worse with time. I haven't had a game in a long while where I thought to myself "yea that was a good game, win or lose." Shit is always a steamroll one side or another. BR3 is half the problem and the lack of filling/balancing player slots is the other part. My other group is so tired of it that they auto leave any Normandy maps or if they see tons of decorators on the other team. Its no wonder that the games population is way down.
GET RID OF BR3 AND MAKE IT JUST 2 TYPES OF LOBBIES ALREADY. Early war larp and late war suffering. Hell do SOMETHING to try and fix it.

> My other group is so tired of it that they auto leave any Normandy maps or if they see tons of decorators on the other team
Lol shitter alert

>>474549406
Bro it sucks. I like playing all factions but most retards i interact with end up not wanting their nuts smashed since they get put up against meta kills quads and virgins swords. Not matter how we feel about it its gonna stay like that and we're gonna keep seeing DC symbols next to names until shit changes. I just got out of a match where 6 of my rando teammates DC'ed and im just left with the dick in my hands like "ah sick dude let me just 1v6 real quick"
If im rolling low tier Germany/US though and feel like going to Tunisia though you bet your ass ill DC till i get the map set I want. Otherwise just suck it up and play it out. But hey thats just another problem in the ocean of current issues.

File: 20240204035931_1.jpg (514 KB, 2560x1440)

514 KB JPG

>>474552796
*blocks your path*

>>474555051
What a cute, native german.

Finally encountered a slav stack. Haven't see one of those in a month.

Does anyone have a video back when there was a Vierling AA gun, and it could be used against infantry since its depression allowed for it to be aimed low enough?

I remember when I first started playing I jumped into one that was placed inside the Reichstag, aimed down a corridor.

>>474566448
They really should re-enable the lower depression, now that none of the guns have shields or four god damn barrels

>>474566448
>>474566875
https://youtu.be/7jWCsu35yhI?si=NTU1wOZRlck_n6eA

Found one

Can the premium Erma EMP squad add in a specialist like the legacy squads? Or is it just a useless assaulter 4man assaulter squad?

>>474569558
Community resource says it can get an engineer, but the Erma EMP is basically just a Sten. The silenced one is good.

>>474507667
>spending anything on this game
lol lmao even. only a tryhard faggot would willingly give money for this game. oink oink paypig. eat your slop and like it.

>>474507667
>>474571847
I have 575 gold now, wonder when they'll gift away gold again. Then I'll be able to get the battle pass.

may day is soon
I think that's when everything goes on sale
might get the russian slut squad or the LVT

>>474578471
Yeah but its not the usual latest stuff, I assume everything before the Russian paras including them will be on sale. So the LVT and Japanese half tracks wont e for sale I dont think.

>>474580914
>So the LVT and Japanese half tracks wont e for sale I dont think.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbCJK1-yhnk

>internet shits out during a great tunisia game as americans
killing myself

>>474588550
>lose because I don't pay to win
>d/c because I don't pay for my internet

>>474597118
the changs are personally sabotaging my internet

Maus

actually big maps

>>474597572
>shit on a chickenscratch player in an embarassing way
>imternet immediately begins lagging or connection cuts out entirely
Sometimes I wonder...

it was divined to me
the next BP weapons will be the M3 carbine, StG44 with Vampir, PPSh-41 with Ts-3, and the japanese get a beam lance

>>474613412
oh and night maps will be release on the 10th major update from now

My dad works for Latvia and he said the Axis is getting removed next patch.

File: 1701687341804979.jpg (174 KB, 923x780)

174 KB JPG

I really like the MP 35, it's a shame that it's a pointless weapon and I have no space for it in my lineup. I actually miss playing my MP 35 HP golems.

>play a few games
>as BR2 americans
>obliterate germans without any resistance

what's going on

>>474616638
I'm playing Tier III Germans right now on the US server and every match is a down-tier against people who barely fight back.

File: enlisted_2024-04-22_01-42-43.png (496 KB, 1415x519)

496 KB PNG

>>474616638
like what the fuck
half my team is white rank console users, half their team are piss ranked

>>474616985
The battle pass is almost over, reaching major isn't particularly impressive

File: 1698394304765201.jpg (287 KB, 1276x965)

287 KB JPG

I dunno what the fuck is going on here. My team has three rallies up but they went mysteriously unused

>>474580914
My buy list:
Type 100 Paratrooper
Winchester G30M
M24 Chaffe
M55 Reising

If they are on sale:
Jap
Mutt
Germ halftracks

>>474620068
LVT
Jap Halftrack
Dicker Max

>>474620068
Why bother buying the Germ and American APCs when they already have the UC and Siddy Kiffuz?

>>474620068
Well all im gonna get is
Russian paras
Panzer 3 M
Stugs

>>474620727
Because I have 3 line ups for those factions not two.

>>474621102
The Panzer III M seems cool because lmao mini tiger but man, the 50mm blows for anti-infantry, which is 90% of what you will be doing.

>>474621286
Ill just bring 2 short barreled Pz 4s and then the Pz 3M

File: Enlisted Screenshot 2023.(...).png (1.41 MB, 966x809)

1.41 MB PNG

>>474623389
How will you have room for your Flakpanzer and Flammpanzer?

>>474624553
Nice SpEd Tiger, anon.

>>474624553
Ill just buy some more spaces. I dont need the flammpanzer

>>474624624
thanks
https://files.catbox.moe/7pjlv3.mp4

For us poor folk what is the best 3 inf/1 vehicle set up for br2?

>admin gets a 14.88 shot time on his video released on hitler's birthday

File: gay-o-meter.png (59 KB, 408x409)

59 KB PNG

>>474627163
>using american speech while playing germans

>>474630091
What faction

>>474630216
That was the test server, I play with faction language on
https://files.catbox.moe/7vte1k.mp4

>>474630230
Germans. I have all squads unlocked except planes/tanks which is up to II. I am running AssIV, event Ass Eng, the event half-track and EC202/PzIIIN which I never use.

>>474630416
No wait, just the normal halftrack. Which reminds me.. if Darkflow are so anal about realism in this game, how the fuck can the halftrack not cross the railway lines at the airstrip without getting stuck?!?

>>474630416
I feel like event engineers are wasted in BR2, but whatever you want.
I'd personally recommend LMG squads with MG-13s for Germany BR2 with no premiums. The event halftrack is BR3 so you can't use that. You could use the progression halftrack, though I don't know how a 4 slot lineup even works with that, because if you spawn on the halftrack again then it destroys the existing one, and if there are three of them up you can't spawn on it at all, so does that just let you rotate between two infantry squads?
Anyway, for vehicle either the Pz. III N which is very good or the Romanian plane with the ridiculous armament that I can't remember the name of.

>>474630616
You're thinking of the IAR-81C, which flies like ass but has an insane armament.

>>474630616
I find they are useful for the mgs and ampulets on defence missions. You'll probably hate me but I give them Vz. 24s so they are only BR1 too.
With the half track I cycle between the assults and engies until i need to move it up.
>>474630748
>IAR-81C
That is what I was using until I unlocked the EC202. The upgrade in turning is next level. I've upgraded it twice but I dont use it enough to unlock the final upgrade, not that I could probably afford it with the shitty amount of silver earned. I'm working on getting max stat AssIVs

>>474630920
>I find they are useful for the mgs and ampulets on defence missions
Yeah, I don't deny that it's good, I just meant mine is parked in my BR5 preset and I don't swap individual squads back and forth between presets.

>>474631019
That's the problem with being poor. I have to swap squads, disarm reserves and and re-equip the new squad(s). A lot of the time I forget and have a squad with nothing but the shitty starter gun and a knife.

>>474630920
The IAR is what you use if you wanna do a bombing run then shoot down one or two guys before bailing. It's not for dedicated air superiority.

>motorcycles have functional speedometers
huh

>>474631176
You don't have to disarm, just use the individual soldier presets

>>474631725
I just use the fighter to go after the bombers if the enemy calls in a bombing run. I am pretty shit at flying with kb+m.
>>474632049
You have to disarm if you don't have enough upgraded guns to go around. One day Darkflow with give me enough silver to equip all the squads... yeah right

File: capture.jpg (194 KB, 1521x1155)

194 KB JPG

I also hope I am picking the right upgrades here. Just wondering if I should go for stamina boost/recharge speed instead, but I have flasks.

>>474632536
99% of the time I pick grenade range, reload speed, and probably melee speed if I have a point left over for yellow, stamina and health restore for red, and medkit speed and crawl speed for green

I am a professional shitter

>>474632536
>No medpack usage speed
Am I the only one who invests in it?

>>474632706
I based my picks on making my squadies a bit more self sufficient but they still stand where I am trying to build shit and stand and watch as some fucker with a bolt action calmly shoots my entire squad down with a bolt action.
>>474632710
>Med speed
I use that on my RiflemanIIIs

>>474632536
No, that's a pretty terrible setup.
Heal over time is worthless outside of vehicle crew. 1/5 into increased chance to down is good, IF you are running medkit use speed. The extra points aren't doing anything but increasing your bleedout time, and it doesn't matter because you don't have medkit use speed. You could be putting those extra points into the turn accuracy perk and then dump the rest into melee (which increases mine drop speed for some reason)
Fire and change of pose should be put into crouch speed instead.
You should have vertical reduction + reload speed to take advantage of the assaulter IV base reload speed perk.

>>474633405
Does melee still affect engineer build speed?

>>474633508
It never did, it just made the swing animation faster

>>474633508
Nope it affects mine placement speed.
You should always put one pip into melee speed since it increases your damage from 2 hits to down to one hit to down. Removing the opportunity cost of lack of bayonet/axe

>>474636869
You forget the best part of the bayonet though. Tard charging into enemies while screaming. Best part of the game.

File: 1713600397149567.jpg (113 KB, 848x660)

113 KB JPG

A reminder that under your achievements tab, killing one enemy with a bolt action rifle, is rewarded with the same amount of silver as killing

>250 enemies as a Paratrooper

>Destroying 500 enemy tanks

>Performing a 50 killstreak with one soldier

>Destroying 100 tanks with AT-mines

>Killing 5000 (Five Thousand) enemies while defending a strategic point

>Killing 5000 (Five Thousand) enemies while attacking a strategic point

>Destroying 250 Aircraft


for doing all of that, you receive 1000 (one thousand) silver for each task

File: PPSh-Curved-Barrel.jpg (23 KB, 660x340)

23 KB JPG

>>474613412
Wrong it will be this PPSh, equipped with a drum mag

>>474630131
Where?

File: 1687484391062874.jpg (155 KB, 742x400)

155 KB JPG

>>474630567
>Trying to cross a railway with a half-track

https://youtu.be/0cVlTeIATBs?si=DB7kw7YxcUQ7W7kV

MM BR III-IV will be the sweet spot.

>>474275594
dude that would be freaking epic xD

>https://enlisted.net/en/news/show/719-extending-the-battle-pass-en/#!/
Battle ass is getting extended 2 more weeks. Probably to sinc with an update

>>474647927
thanks, I hate it

>>474647927
two more weeks of not playing

>>Have seven legacy sniper squads
>Research would give me another two

The only reason I ever touched these, was due to every campaign starting you off with one.

Smooth brains giving you snipers instead of engineers when you first enter the game.
What were they thinking

File: 1711870840121.jpg (26 KB, 612x408)

26 KB JPG

>>474647927
oh great another fortnite of getting 1000 silver or 1 x 50% xp boost every other day

>Finally get a non dogshit allied team
>Germinigger resort to suicide spamming rocket planes
>Spawning multiple BR 3 tanks
>Spamming mortarts
Germniggers that play BR3 should have their skulls cracked opened with claw-hammers. Also all Axis faggots should get -50% Vit to compensate for the lack of spine.

>>474647927
fuck kill me now

>>474647927
rip

>>474651389
>>474656482
I should really be grinding after my recent Japan expenses, but I'm not feeling it

>>474682026
I got 2 mil XP saved up for my japs. You couldn't pay me real money to play on the same 3 maps anymore.

The Pacific needs a non Jungle/Island map. Singapore or Manilla plus Okinawa would be the bare minimum to make it enjoyable. If they add an RU-Japan battlefield like Manchuria they need 3 maps and they need at least one of them to be different environment. So if you get 2 steps map they should have a full on urban or mountain map.

>>474684778
No I mean I spent like a million silver setting up Jap BR 2 and 3

>>474684778
not to mention 2 of those maps have errors that cause the fucking ai to drown themselves on attacking

>>474617784
when that happens it's dead giveaway of consolefaggotry on your team

>>474684778
I like the alternate bibilo hill maps, the ship caps and the cave caps are pretty fun

File: 1696553613547139.jpg (4 KB, 250x180)

4 KB JPG

>Flametrooper 2 squad
>19640 xp
>For the first squad level

>>474685360
Can't stand all these open field maps

Reasons to pay BR2 soviets:
>Every match is a challenge
>PPS-43
>You'll always finish top 3
>Paraniggers
>Body armour
>Winchester
>Best tech tree BR2 APC

>>474702732
You forgot:
>Flame Tank
>Milk Truck AA
>76mm BT-7

>>474704636
are those paypiggie items or just old event rewards?

>>474702732
cons of playing BR2 soviets
>stalingrad
>germs

>>474705196
The flame tank is a paypiggy thing but the AA is from an event (it's awful) and the BT-7A was also from an event or Twitch drops, I can't remember.

>>474702732
>>474708205
The Winchester, paratroopers, and PPS-43 aren't even uniquely good anymore. The Americans get the Enfields and Owen, the Germans get the Italian paras and Mannlicher, et cetera. While it is nice, the PPS-43 alone isn't a game winner.

You also forgot the P-40E Lend-Lease which is remarkably strong but literally nobody uses.

>>474705196
Yes

>>474708675
P-40 flies like a fucking brick, and that’s in comparison to an IL-2

>>474617784
confrontation sometime kill the rallies when moving to the next points. I think it has to do with how close they are from the next spawns

>>474672612
Spawn time decrease with consistency of play per side. Every game after 3 in a row adds 5 seconds to all spawns including initial. Deserting a match still counts. Takes 3 non side matches to reset.

I.e., you play 9 matches in a row for Germany and on the 10th, all your spawns take at least basic spawn time + 35 seconds. To reset it you need to play 3 matches in a rown as any faction but Germany.

Elegant, simple, and punishes the shittier, trihard 'mains' of any side

>>474708675
> but the AA is from an event (it's awful)
It’s fun and rapes enemy Stuka spam

>>474708883
Fully upgraded and unloaded (once you drop your bombs) it flies totally competently and competitively, has a great armament, et cetera. It's really strong for a BR II vehicle.

>>474710601
Whenever I have ever used it, even pre-merge, I always just got plink sniped from across the map, regardless of where I positioned. Some psycho player would be sitting in a bush 400 meters away from the point seemingly exclusively waiting for an open-top vehicle, only one of which existed in Moscow at the time, to appear. It's fun if that doesn't happen, but it always happens.

Where do you put your TnT charges on a tank? The amount of times I climbed the, and put it above the engine, only for there to not even be penetration, or fire just makes me swear of them.

Best results are always had with the explosive packs, the only tank that reliably withstands them is a Russian one, can't recall the model. It's the Gold order one with "Smash the Fascist" painted on it.

>>474711034
Wasn’t weight changes from dropping armament debunked

>>474711496
Typically people just place them on the side. A TNT charge on the side of a Tiger can kill it. It's only really the KV-1s that are mysteriously immune to TNT charges.

>>474711637
You can test it yourself. If you drop the bombs you are carrying, you start going faster.

>>474709324
I doubt a gamey that forces its players to spend time in a faction would retain a playerbase for long.

Especially one as grindy as Enlisted.
I barely have enough silver to outfit more than my four squads, and that is only for the BR II or V line up.

>>474711925
I noticed watching others that the charges actually stick to the tank, my experience with them left a sour taste in my mouth.

>>474712520
A lot of people don't use TNT charges anyway because it's easier and more reliable to just use your handheld AT. KV-1s are uniquely retarded and nearly impossible to kill with explosive bundles and TNT charges

>>474712913
I've been thinking about using an AT squad just so that I can run around with a gas mask.

>>474714103
Since day 1, the Moscow CBTs, I have always put an AT trooper in every squad. The sheer utility an AT trooper provides makes it the second best "support" class in the game, only beaten by Engineers. Radios and Medics just can't compete.

>>474714461
Medics can be good point hogs, if more people would use the down time perk they might very well shine in their utility.

Bot medics are also pretty good when it comes to using their syringes.
Frankly, I use my radio men just due to having some Italian ones, just so that I may hear

>AR-TI-LARIA

>14 days of prem left
it's so fucking ogre....

>>474716364
Pay up, piggie

>>474711496
Engine deck seems to work pretty much on every tank. Bare minimum it lights it on fire which dumps the crew

>>474716494
no...

>>474708675
>Twitch drops
how do these work?

File: 1682340954905122.jpg (304 KB, 1920x1080)

304 KB JPG

This match should not have been as unreasonably difficult as it was. At one point my entire team got held up in our spawn by a single M13. Still, it's nice to have a semi-close match once in a while. As much as I hated CannabisCanoe for spamming wire and sandbags and mines everywhere, I can't fault him for actually playing the fucking objective.

>>474729528
They used to have events where, if you had a Twitch account linked to your Gaijin account, watching for certain amounts of hours gave you rewards. Vehicle skins, unique soldiers, the German Hi-Power, stuff like that. Nothing really amazingly useful. They haven't done one in a while.

>>474730137
Thanks. Did those blue T tokens we got from breaking dead have anyting to do with twitch?

>>474731672
No, those were from the Anniversary of the Gewehr 98 Adoption Event which gave you one token to buy a sword on whichever faction you wish.

>>474731802
These were different from those. At the end of a BD round they had a blue square with a T on it instead of the usual silver coin.

>>474731672
>>474731802
>>474731978
There were the G98 Wartime tokens as well as the weird T tokens that the game said you earned at the end of Breaking Dead rounds, but they most likely weren't anything. They might have been a way for Darkflow to track something internally, or just a resource that the game "gives" you because of code spaghetti meaning you HAVE to get something at the end of a match.

>Beloe Lake as Slavs
>Attacking the church as first point
>TWO germcunts and TWO tanks go into the hills like 300m away from the point
>Two Germcunt squads build AT guns and just start shelling the point while the tanks ALSO shell the point
>I manage to get into a position to blow up one of the Germcunts with my T-34
>He quits the match
I get he just wanted an easy farming match but Jesus Christ what a niggerish thing to do.

>>474736319
First time playing against German players?

>>474711925
In the KV-1 you place the charge on top of the hull front in front of the turret where the hatches are.

>>474755538
Which is insane that only that one tank needed an instructional guide like it was a boss battle and yet Slavniggers still act like it wasn’t a problem

>Get put against an American team mostly consisting of piss ranks
>They play like absolute nigger cunts
>Rallies behind our lines (while we're attacking), camping in the most retarded nigger spots, HVAR spam, explosives spam, flamethrower spam
>We still win in a landslide because they're never on the fucking point

>>474765502
Only subhumans played Stalingrad anyway.

File: HAT.jpg (33 KB, 327x348)

33 KB JPG

DARKFLOW I KNOW YOU'RE READING THIS. ADD THIS HAT TO THE BATTLEPASS. ALSO THE SNIPER VEIL FOR THE GERMANS, THANKS.

love me spaghetti skyniggers
even if their magazines are rather small

>>474767336
I suppose I should replace my Lebel boys with them, but meh. I hardly use paras anymore.

>>474767334
Why would you want a hat that we already have? I was Hachimakis for Japan

>>474767821
I just like their uniforms