>information I can't really talk about now...
My vagueking...

File: 4cc vs wc finals 2018.webm (1.61 MB, 1200x338)

1.61 MB WEBM

I love goyball

This is the thread

File: __imari_youko_ruri_no_hou(...).jpg (83 KB, 858x1008)

83 KB JPG

>>567492452
Made for homebody undergraduates

>>567264028
and the results?

File: 1445761653631.jpg (88 KB, 640x480)

88 KB JPG

>>567492245
DID SOMEONE SAY ROCKS?

>>567493090
/yourteam/ boring bad, /myteam/ fun bad

Daily reminder that Sou should show the votes!

>>567493090
It will take some time to graph it but here is the raw data from 29 votes.

https://pastebin.com/6qt1R0sL

Definitely a strong recency bias but I also think there is a trend are harsher on poor performances from teams they don't like.

File: the cull.jpg (1.52 MB, 1280x4320)

1.52 MB JPG

>>567493278
>expecting commissioner fatfuck to show his hand
Even Lear showed his numbers back in the cull days. Now they were laughable and immediately exposed just how arbitrary that decision was, but that's kind of the point

>>567493730
And the AI analysis of the results

4CC Team Poll: Key Findings and Insights
Overview
The 4CC Team Poll gathered responses from 29 participants who rated 45 teams on two dimensions:

On-field performance (1 = “consistent fetus team” to 5 = “consistent elite cup contender”).
Fun/interest level (1 = “not fun/interesting” to 5 = “very fun/interesting”).
Below is a detailed summary of the key findings, sentiment analysis, and actionable conclusions.

Key Findings
1. On-Field Performance Rankings
Top 5 Teams (Highest Average Scores)
/sp/ – 4.79 (Elite contender, highest-rated team)
/pw/ – 4.69 (Strong performance, near-elite)
/wsg/ – 4.34 (Consistently high-performing)
/his/ & /v/ – 3.76 (Tied for 4th place)
/b/ – 3.76 (Tied for 4th place)
Bottom 5 Teams (Lowest Average Scores)
/cm/ – 1.24 (Lowest-rated, significant underperformance)
/xs/ – 1.62 (Poor performance)
/c/ & /vrpg/ & /wg/ – 1.90 (Tied for 3rd worst)
/vt/ – 1.97 (Slightly better but still weak)

Key Observations
/sp/ and /pw/ dominate in performance, suggesting they are clear favorites for competitive success.
/cm/, /xs/, and /c/ are struggling, indicating potential resource allocation or strategy issues.
Several mid-tier teams (e.g., /a/, /fit/, /tv/, /v/) hover around 3.5–3.7, showing steady but not elite performance.

>my team is bad and boring
that's it, I will cry now

>>567493864
2. Fun/Interest Level Rankings
Top 5 Most Fun/Interesting Teams
/vr/ – 4.14 (Most engaging, highest fun rating)
/a/ – 4.07 (Close second in entertainment value)
/his/ – 4.03 (Highly engaging)
/3/ – 3.83 (Strong fan interest)
/s4s/ & /wsg/ – 3.90 (Tied for 5th place)
Bottom 5 Least Fun/Interesting Teams
/cm/ – 1.48 (Least engaging, lowest fun rating)
/aco/ – 1.69 (Very low interest)
/lit/ – 1.79 (Unengaging)
/vt/ – 1.76 (Low entertainment value)
/u/ & /r9k/ – 1.90 (Tied for 5th worst)

Key Observations
/vr/ is the most entertaining team, despite not being a top performer (on-field avg: 2.93).
/a/ and /his/ are both high in fun and performance, making them fan favorites.
/cm/ and /aco/ are disliked in both metrics, suggesting low engagement and poor results.
Some teams (e.g., /sp/, /v/, /vp/) balance performance and fun well, while others (e.g., /vr/, /s4s/) are more entertaining than competitive.

>>567493864
grok you can't just repeat the result table and call it an analysis

>>567493942
Sentiment Analysis
Emotional Response Breakdown
Positive Sentiment (High Performance + High Fun)

/a/, /his/, /v/, /sp/, /wsg/ – Teams that excel in both metrics, likely generating excitement and loyalty.
/vr/ – High fun but mid-tier performance, suggesting strong fan engagement despite results.
Neutral Sentiment (Average in Both Metrics)

/3/, /co/, /m/, /tv/, /vg/ – Solid but not standout in either category.
/pol/, /tg/, /int/ – Moderate interest, room for improvement.
Negative Sentiment (Low Performance + Low Fun)

/cm/, /xs/, /c/, /vrpg/, /wg/ – Teams that struggle in both areas, possibly leading to frustration or disinterest.
/aco/, /lit/, /vt/ – Low engagement, may need rebranding or restructuring.

Actionable Conclusions & Recommendations
1. Strengthen Top Performers
Invest in /sp/, /pw/, and /wsg/ to maintain dominance in competitions.
Leverage /a/, /his/, and /v/ as fan engagement leaders—consider promotional content or events around them.
2. Improve Struggling Teams
/cm/, /xs/, and /c/ need urgent attention—possible coaching changes, strategy reviews, or community engagement efforts.
/aco/ and /lit/ should reassess their appeal—could they merge with other teams or rebrand?
3. Balance Fun & Performance
/vr/ is highly entertaining but not elite—could performance improvements make them a top-tier team?
/s4s/ and /wsg/ are fun but not dominant—should they focus on competitive training?
4. Mid-Tier Teams: Potential for Growth
/tv/, /vg/, /m/ are solid but not standout—could small tweaks push them into elite status?
/pol/ and /tg/ have moderate interest—could marketing or event-based engagement boost their appeal?
5. Address Low-Engagement Teams
Teams like /cm/, /aco/, /lit/ may benefit from community feedback sessions to identify pain points.
If engagement doesn’t improve, consider merging or discontinuing low-interest teams to allocate resources better.

>>567494008
Final Summary
Best Overall Teams: /sp/, /pw/, /a/, /his/, /v/ (high performance + high fun).
Most Entertaining (But Not Elite): /vr/, /s4s/, /wsg/ (great for engagement, but need competitive boost).
Biggest Underperformers: /cm/, /xs/, /c/, /aco/ (low performance + low fun—urgent action needed).
Key Insight: Performance and fun don’t always align—some teams (/vr/, /s4s/) are more entertaining than competitive, while others (/sp/, /pw/) are elite but not necessarily the most engaging.
Next Steps:
Double down on top performers (/sp/, /pw/, /a/).
Revitalize struggling teams (/cm/, /xs/, /aco/) or merge them.
Enhance engagement for mid-tier teams (/tv/, /vg/, /m/) to boost their appeal.
Leverage fan favorites (/vr/, /s4s/) for community-building events.
```

This report provides clear, data-driven insights with actionable recommendations for decision-makers.

File: Sou-2020_Autumn_Draw_Stre(...).png (444 KB, 723x545)

444 KB PNG

>>567493278
>Sou should show the votes!
That makes sense, there is a Kingdom in Heaven and in Hell there is Democracy

https://youtu.be/DNSU4rnNgpc