Do you consider this artwork to be “too sexualized”?
>>55783043I like Touya's art but it doesn't make me wanna fap
>>55783043No, but is this
>>55783043Pedos deserve the torch
>>55783043No it strategically is blocking most of the pit views which is painfully sfw.The tumblr red+shine on her thighs but nowhere else also just looks off, so that hurts the sec appeal too
Imao, just did some research and twitterfags are seething over this art.
>>55783471pathetic honestlylike this is tame as hell
>>55783471The safe horny brigade is going to self destruct eventually. I can't wait.
>>55783488>>55783483Um, that drawing is a sexualized 14 year old, you sick fucks!
i genuinely don't understand how people find random twitter controversies, but maybe that's only because i only ever follow like 4-5 DBZfags
>>55783499>caring about a fictional characters age>not even getting her age right (shes 16 in bw2)get a load of this retard
Pro tip: Never look up the comments on Pokemoa publications on twitter.
>>55783488What the fuck is safe horny supposed to mean? I've seen you niggers use it a bunch of times now.
>>55783043It's not even that sexual, Twitter is just full of people who try to act holier than thou about everything. It's all complete bullshit. Funniest part is most of the people that act like that tend to have skeletons in the closet themselves.
>>55783196Schizophrenics who can't separate 2d drawings from reality deserve the firing squad.
>>55783548It's a buzzword insult that describes a very specific type of person who puts down the general old-school male fanservice type of sexuality while boosting Buzzfeed horny, basically. Lots of bulges and furries and muscle women and being trod upon and shit.I don't care either way, but those people get on my nerves and I'm glad somebody came up with the insult so I didn't have to.
>>55783548Not him, but it means horny that's deemed acceptable by leftists, i. e. horny that appeals to LGBTQ+.
>>55783471>>55783483https://twitter.com/Touyarokii/status/1782852093490913353/quotesA bunch of watermelon emoji retards trying to shame the artist.
>>55783043Touya would get less shit if she just came out and was honest about the fact that she likes lewd pokegirls (and boys), instead of the pussyfooting charade she keeps trying to uphold.
>>55783700I would respect her a little more if she just said she doesn't give a shit. But she definitely wants to play the algorithm and get on people's good side, which is why she replies to so many people and baits engagement with stupid questions.
>>55783582
>>55783700It wouldn't matter, either way. Look at how they treat people they deem problematic. They'll never let it go.
>>55783344You know porn addiction is crazy when hair covering a cartoons armpit is painfully sfw.
>>55783196There is almost never any design difference in late teen to young adult range. Even then artists will draw some mid twenties guy or woman and say "their actually 12 years old". Jotaro Kujo is 17 while he looks at least a decade older.>>55783515The character shown here is clearly a child when compared to OP's image. Regardless, characters can be depicted however the artist wants. In cases like OP image I just interpret it as an adult because bunga.
>>55783043It's definitely pretty sexualized, the cleavage and rosy thighs make it clear the artist wanted to make it sexy. Nothing wrong with it though unless you're a pearl clutching faggot.>>55783721I know this person never leaves their dirty room because they clearly never see real teenagers. Plus they probably repressed their own memories of high and middle school cause they got bullied.We all know that one girl who had D cups in 5th or 6th grade, cmon.Also artists can age up a character. God, how do these people live with themselves? Imagine constantly seething at non-issues. It's like there on the other side of the spectrum of the /pol/ schizos here on 4chins.
>>55784189>thereI can't believe I made that mistake*they're
>>55783582>post with 6 likes>original post has 10k likeswho gives a shit?
>>55783562>>55783565there is an extremely obvious war on hetero male sexuality. Theyll attack men over anything and everything. calling men pedos for being attracted to young women is the easiest crotch shot so they do it non-stop. Don't let it stick to you. The internet is toxic for men, especially vaginacentric communist shitholes like hornytwitter. As if those people understand ethics or aesthetics or history or biology or HOT BLOODED MALES like us.One day we're all gonna make it bros. When you get that girl give it all youve got and never let these fuckers shame you for your biological imperative. Let them castrate themselves and degenerate. Their homo genes wont be the ones passed on to the next generation but ours will. Godspeed/
>>55784219No anon, it's not just straight men being targeted. They attack everyone for "wrongthink" because of "problematic content". That includes women and gays too. I could name a couple examples if you'd like.The internet is toxic for everyone who likes things in fiction that would be taboo in real life. These people have severe anger and other mental health issues, and their current targets are those who have a healthy relationship with fictional content, who can actually distinct fiction from reality. But the people who harass artists are people who were online way too much, probably spent their formative years on tumblr where mental health issues were straight up romanticised to the point where they started believing that kinning (thinking that a fictional character is "literally you" to the point you LARP as them 24/7) was normal. Well, whatever happened to them, they accepted this new mob mentality as their religion. They would never admit to that because most them think religions are evil and bad, but it's exactly what it is: a set of beliefs they strictly have to follow while condemning everyone who goes against those beliefs. And it gives them a sense of belonging with like-minded people. It's a modern from of cult. So no, it's not an internet crusade against straight men, they just happen to usually belong to the group these nutjobs oppose. They want to censor art and creative freedom to fit their deranged world view. We are regressing back to people wanting to burn books and art like the Nazis did in the Third Reich.But there is a glimmer of hope. This whole ESG and DEI fiasco causes people to wake up. They realize that this censorship craze is going too far. Just look at that recent Capcom Twitter post about "localisation". It'll take a while, but I think we can get out of this situation eventually. Just don't bow down to those mentally ill mobs. Tell them to take their meds and keep enjoying fictional content that safely explores human desires
I remember when people didn’t talk like cartoon caricatures
>>55783043Yes and it's a good thing
>>55783344>tumblr red+shine on her thighsI agree these looks awful. Otherwise it's fantastic artwork
>>55783077Holy shit
>>55783903>The character shown here is clearly a childNo child has birthing hips like that, try again.
Didn't they already tried to cancel her for sexualizing Calem before?
>>55785624Yeah, this has happened a few times before. I remember the Calem one, and I think there was another time where people were saying another Hilda drawing was "too sexual".
>>55784219You like 10 year olds.Kill yourself please
>>55787489Mentally ill. You have no idea what pedophilia means and you probably want to fuck hilda too
>>55785273
>>55783483what do you mean this is "tame as hell"there's mild cleavageand a girl that isn't obese that's wearing clothing exposing her thighsthis is EVIL and DISGUSTING
>>55783043No, and I want to have sex with Hilda and Touya.
>>55783860On the other hand, someone would have to be crazy to consider this nsfw
>>55783344Here's a quick edit I did. I feel like it looks a lot better, which then begs the question of why add it to begin with? It's such a last minute detail that does nothing for the whole work.
>>55787665huh, it is better.
>>55783077What's this from?
>>55783077>go back in time>slap some sense into the guy designing Ash>fast forward>slap some sense into the guy designing Rosa and what's-his-face>fast forward>we have Hilbert and Hilda going on an adventure in season 9 and 10
>>55787647You didn't understand. I'm saying you need to be so porn addicted for an armpit to turn you on and to complain about it being covered.
>>55785273>>55787518Cute feet!
>>55787489>A 2d drawing of a chinese cartoon character has the same rights and is the same thing as a real living, breathing personPlease never reproduce, we don't need more sub-60 IQ retards in the world.>>55787665That's the same picture
>>55789461You will never reproduce as you like kidsKys. Soon thanks >it’s just a drawing!!Cope. Bye
Pedos get the rail gun
>>55789463>You will never reproduce as you like kidsI find children repugnant and disgusting. They are loud, obnoxious, violent, and lack any sense of civility.>Kys. Soon thanks You first you sub-60 IQ retard who's full on delusional and can't separate reality from fiction. I bet you think it's murder to shoot another player's character in a video game.>it’s just a drawing!!It quite literally is. It has no sapience, no rights, no nothing. It isn't real. It will never be real. Get back to me when this board starts posting actual cheese pizza then maybe you'll have an argument, but until photographs of IRL children are posted on this board your argument holds no water, it's literally the same sensationalist bullshit as "VIDEO GAMES CAUSE IRL VIOLENCE".>Cope. ByeYou're the only one coping here boyo.>>55789507Agreed, good thing a drawing of a fictional cartoon character is not a real child nor does it look anything like a real child.
>55789518Didn’t read, off yourself p3do your rationalisations just prove you’re a disgusting freak. Normies know you’re a rock spider. Bye
>hurrr it’s just a drawingEpic! So I can draw myself violating black people and if I show it to my black boss he can’t fire me or get mad bc it’s just a drawing right! It doesn’t have sentience! HurrrPedos are low Iq
>>55789518Hilda is literally 14 in bw. You’re jerking off to a teenagerDon’t you feel any guilt about that you sick cunt
>>55789533>>55789518
>>55789561>>55789507
I think fearow is cooler than pidgeot
Imagine jerking it to teens and rationalising it. Good thing none of you will procreate
>>55789572Either WW3 or AGI-level AI will kill us all within the decade so I think I’m good
>>55789572I don’t have to imagine
>>55789572>>55789507>>55789463this >>55783512
>>55789600Okay Doomer.
N-no she’s akshually 16 not 14Kys ped
>>55789630I’m jerking off to Rosa tonight. Thoughts?
>>55789626>>55789622There's something about Redditors and making up accusations no normie will take seriously.
>>55789626>Thinking religious and secular laws go hand-in-hand>Historical Puritans have been getting girls younger than Hilda pregnant because living past 30 wasn't common.
>>55789628I mean if you can give me some hopium then do as as you will, but I doubt it
I demand more milk
>>55789640All I know is that thinking we live in John Connor times because jobs like being an email wench that needs Grammarly have been made redundant or Chipotle playing a burrito robot is doomer talk
Weird pedo freaks answer this question seriously: have you jerked off to hilda or Rosa ever ? I’d the answer is yes, you’re beneath me. There fucking kids
>>55789650You’re delusional and low Iq if you don’t think AI takeover is a very real issue
>>55789653Why would I when Roxie is right there?
>>55789668That’s a fucking schoolgirl not even 13. Ugh
>>55789645>>55789637There's something about Redditors and making up false accusations no normie will take seriously.
>>55789639You're talking about Islam. Earliest Christian documents required a fully grown woman because anything below 20 was considered pagan. Muslims are pagan pedophiles.
>>55789659I just don't think Skynet level shit is gonna happen just because of generative AI blowing up and self-driving cars being optioned on the market. There's still jobs where a person is gonna be in demand and frankly it's always been "adapt or die" in the labor market. Feeling sad for myself because ChatGPT exists is a luxury belief to hold when there's always a need for things like tradesmen, roofers or truck drivers.
>>55789672>>55789653>she thinks Normies would defend pedosLol!
>>55789678Good thing nobody calls this pedo except redditors. Which is why Reddit's a slur.
>55789689>she thinks normal people aren’t disgusted by fat gooners jerking it to 13 year old Pokémon girlsLol!
>>55783043Not even close.
>>55789691>>55789689That's why nobody likes Redditors and also why normies love to say everything opposite of what you believe in.
>>55789671You're just pulling that out your ass, she's just scrawny
>>55789674>Earliest Christian documents required a fully grown woman because anything below 20 was considered pagan.You got that all wrong.A boy is considered a man once he's 20 in the bible but it doesn't specify anything about how young is too young to marry.also https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/14/bible-child-marriage-in-ancient-israelite-times-paedophilia/>inb4muholdtestament
>has to invent a reddit straw men to defend his love of jerking it too girls under 15Lmao!
>>55789674Christians allowed underage marriage pretty much up to post WW2 when feminism rose to power and got the laws changed. The idea of adulthood at 18, especially for women is recent.
I get the impression that there’s only like 9-10 IPs in this thread
>>55789729>SneedvilleLooks fake
>>55789739Real place, population of just under 1300, look it up
>>55789749I don't believe you and you probably paid Google to forge the results.
>>55789739It’s indeed real, you might be more familiar with its older name, Chuckville
>>55789702God punished them for it. You need to read the Strong's.>>55789729Americans were rarely Christians. Remember that the Bible says calling yourself a follower means nothing.
>>55789553That's hot
>>55789507Awesome! I always wanted a cool gun. Magnets, how do they work?Thanks for the weapon!
When did people become such prudes online?
>>55790357When they felt alarmed that adults don't grow out of their hobbies
>>55783077Those fucking collarbones ToT
>>55789600>or AGI-level AI will kill us all Now I’m not the sharpest tool in the crayon box, but I’ve never understood how this worksLike, yeah, AI that’s basically all of humanity’s accumulated knowledge plus much greater processing power is kinda scary, but outside of the generic>AI will launch nukes everywhere and blow us all up!!!!11!!1!1!one (this has always felt kind of dubious to me for some reason)I’ve never really seen anyone truly explain how AI would destroy us in a way that’s actually grounded in reality
>>55789633Sharing is caring
>>55783043Only a redditor would think this is too sexualised.
>>55783043She's sexy, so what?>>55783582Ah, faggot Twitter zoomers on a moral crusade.