I'm poor, should i buy Violet or wait patiently for Z-A?>BD was tolerable, just wish it had more new mons>TLA was good, just missed having more content and harder battles
>>57175234Try Violet. It's fun
>>57175234honestly it dependsviolet is a good game, but not worth spending high money for. I'd say like, £35 max?
>>57175251ThisNone of the switch games are worth over that
>>57175234OK but what does Wellcheers have anything to do with Violet?
>>57175234Sword/Shield are better games than Scarlet/Violet, if you insist on buying one instead of just emulating them
>>57175533idk, they are purple, they give you purple soda and kinda look like pokemon
>>57175547Why would you lie to OP like this?
>>57175234i'd wait for ZA
>>57175234if you buy violet even if you get it cheap you are only getting half the game, the latter half of the story is locked behind the dlc
>>57176511>later halfThe DLC story hardly has anything to do with the base game story
>>57176511Nope, Paldea's story starts and finishes with basegame. The DLC's story is about introducing Kieran, starting his character arc, and then concluding it.
>>57175234you shouldn't buy any of those games because 3D era gamefreak and TPC lazy as fuck and they don't desrve to earn money. SV are the worst games in the whole series and gen 1 will most certainly be worse. they STILL have brought back natdex, optional exp share, all those cut moves, battle facilities (or any sort of good post game really) and so many more features. the game doesn't even have good graphics to compensate. it looks like a N64 game. SV are very low effort games
>>57175234I'd wait. SV isn't even worth emulating, let alone buying.
>>57177406I get not liking SV but if you seriously think they are low effort then you're a retardSV is one of the most ambitious games they had to far, they just didn't give themselves the time needed to polish itThe open world stuff clearly took tons of work, and even then they included some details like Pokémon sleeping in the shade, certain Pokémon having specific interactions etcAlso it's literally the first time they didn't completely half-ass the storyThere's some other stuff that shows that it's definitely not low effort slop, if anything it shows that their scope was too big for such a small timeframe. The graphics being bad has very little to do with it, I guess unless you're one of those graphics obsessed morons who would rather play with a polished turd instead of an actually good game
>>57175234Violet is worth a try. I recommend it.
>>57175234Scarlet/Violet's fun if you just want a region to explore. The battles are never really super challenging.There's no level scaling or guidance as to where to go, so I just built random teams from my boxes when doing important fights.
