Behold, a Flying-Type specialist in denial.
>>57224953He specializes in dragons, not the Dragon type
>>57224953I've also reached the conclusion that Lance is a Flying type specialist with a Dragon theme
>>57224957you know what? Based to just admit it outright.
>>57224957No matter what Lance may say, Aerodactyl is by no definition a dragon.
>>57225133It looks more like one than it does a pterosaur
>>57225133>its not a dragon its a wyvern
>>57225133
>>57224953Birds are reptiles so actually all Flying-types are dragons
>>57224953No one wants to call himself a "Flying-type specialist". Might as well call yourself a "Bird-type specialist" and transition thereafter.
>>572251334chan truly welcomes the stupidest comments
>>57225170Not all reptiles are dragons. A turtle wouldn't be a dragon.
>>57225256>A turtle wouldn't be a dragon.Hmmm...
>>57225142>>57225147>>57225203Pterodactyls aren't dragons. They're more akin to birds. Not all dinosaurs are dragons. Aerodactyl doesn't even breathe fire to qualify like Charizard does.>>57225153This old man is senile.
>>57226092
Flying is a powerful, versatile type. Good for him.
>>57226121Look up what a Pterodactyl looks like and then look at Aerodactyl again before you decide to grace people with your low intelligence
>>57226121>Aerodactyl doesn't even breathe fireAerodactyl could literally learn Fire Blast since Gen 1 and Flamethrower since Gen 2, idk why you people don't look these things up before posting and making a fool of yourself
>>57224953he's used a number of non-flying dragon type and dragon-adjacent pokemon on his many teams (dragonair, kingdra, garchomp, hydreigon, haxorus, flygon, seadra, alolan exeggutor)and that's not even getting into the spinoffs
>>57225147aerodactyl is a wyvern thoughand gyarados is a wyrm
>>57225171Falkner is cool.
>>57227088beat me to it
>>57225153FRLG retcon, he never says this in the original.
Lance is the kind of guy that calls pokemon she on this board
>>57227739If it was retconned it means it was intended
