[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20260109_232513.jpg (91 KB, 610x1079)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>If the series hadn’t been delayed, we could have had Gen 10 in 2025, and the DLC would have been released this year.
Grim
>>
>new gen pair for the 10th anniversary
>new gen pair for the 20th ann9iversary
>mong retard actually thinks they;d have released a new gen pair the year before the 30th anniversary
Have someone smash your head in with a cement block. You're far too stupid to be let exist any longer.
>>
>>58826365
Is this SV?
>>
Nobody liked it when pokemon games were yearly releases.
>>
>>58826379
>muh anniversaries
>muh patterns
The teraleak proved they don't plan around anniversaries, gen 10 was originally planned for 2025. The delay was caused by other factors.
>>
>>58826398
>The teraleak [FANFIC]
every time
>>
>>58826398
Uh huh. Suuure. that why they had DLC ready for off for shortly after launch? They "planned to release Gen 10 in 2025". 'Cause from looks, it looks like they'd planned L: Z-A for '24 (and the S2 launch) then DLC for '25 to spin out the time (and because faggots squealed they didn't get DLC for L: A, despite ignoring the release schedule back then) to line up Gen 10 with the 30th, just like when they cancelled a further Gen 6 game to ensure they'd released Gen 7 on time in the 20th anniversary. They're WELL aware of their history, even if you don't give a fuck for it, because you didn't exist for most of it.
>>
>>58826400
>GF internal documents are fanfic now
>>
>>58826423
No, teraleak is real, your retarded little fanfic of them shitting out Gen 10 last year, likely on switch so your poverty-cripped arse could steal it, instead of it launching in the anniversary year, on Switch 2 (you know, like most other past hardware systems, where they spent two generations, then fucked off to the hardware upgrade) isn't. Slight difference.
>>
File: 1751737085965512.jpg (159 KB, 1820x1026)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
>>58826420
>>58826434
Sorry it's fact, they are not autistic about anniversary numbers like you want them to be. They're nothing more than useful marketing tools, not something that interrupts the entire development process of one game.
>>
>>58826423
>things that aren't GF internal documents but I claimed I did are fanfic now
correct
>>
>>58826479
Let's all ignore this retard, thanks.
>>
>>58826396
the BW2/XY/ORAS era was very good because games exist to complement each other

Meanwhile we had to wait 3 years until SV got a switch 2 update to fix most of the game's problems
>>
>>58826395
Yep
That's a dragon tamer
>>
>>58826472
>They use the term Gen too
Never knew. What’s Oasis?
>>
>>58827444
Pokopia, GameFreak's been considering it a fairly notable title in their development plans, likely because of the whole "rebuilding a Post-Disaster Kanto" plotline that's being implied that necessitates more direct involvement than usual.
>>
>>58826365
Why so tight? What game is this? Who is she?
>>
>>58826472
Let's all ignore this retard, thanks.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.