[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1i60s31clape1.png (732 KB, 1897x2305)
732 KB
732 KB PNG
What are the chances we are getting a new Eeveelution in WW?
>>
>>59032874
Probably middling. We've gone the longest gap between generations without getting another Eeveelution so they must not be too keen on making more but at the same time, Gen X of Pokemon feels like an appropriate time to give us another one.
>>
>>59032894
>its been 13 years since the last new eevee form
woah
>>
>>59032874
we should of had that flying type eeveelution in sun & moon. i hope the devs re-add the flying type eeveelution in WW
>>
File: 1679674.png (270 KB, 512x389)
270 KB
270 KB PNG
They shill eevee and eeveelutions all the time. I'd be dumbfounded if there was not a new eeveelution in gen 10.
>>
>>59032894
They can't come up with new designs that aren't similar to fakemon.
>>
>>59032936
Who gives a shit? As long as they're not directly ripping off a Fakemon, it shouldn't matter.
>>
>>59032947
That's the reason they didn't release the flying Eevee.
>>
>>59032947
Teraleak showed they scrapped a flying Eevee because it was too similar to a fakemon. I'm guessing they're scared of releasing any new Eeveelutions so people don't accuse them of ripping people off
>>
Leaks had them working on at least 2 new eeveelutions so it's likely for us to get at least one. But not guaranteed.
>>
>>59033035
>>59033043
What a bunch of cowards
>>
We are never getting a dragon eevee because dragon is considered the ultimate type and it would be unfair for the other eeveelutions
>>
>>59032874
5 words: i wouldn't count on it
>>
>>59033058
yeah, it would be so unfair to glaceon
>>
>>59033058
>dragon is considered the ultimate type
Not to the same degree it once was. Early-game Fairy types and their willingness to let you catch Dragons earlier have eroded this.
>>
>>59033043
Dragon typing is pretty mediocre in a vacuum.
>>
File: 1475142631-angryash.jpg (22 KB, 640x425)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
>>59033175
Dragon should be supereffective against water, fire, and grass
>>
Either 0 or 100%
>>
>>59033058
And yet we have Sylveon, a Fairy type, a type that was supposed to balance overpowered types like Dragon, Fighting, or Dark but then it itself ended up becoming the most overpowered type in the game.

If Sylveon can exist then so can a Dragon type Eeveelution. Plus it wouldn't be "unfair to the other Eeveelutions" because Glaceon counters it and even Vaporeon who is not Ice type learns a bunch of Ice type moves. And I know some of the other Eeveelutions get Fairy moves too.
>>
>>59033181
They should make it supereffective against fairy desu
>>
>>59033577
I think bug should be supereffective against fairies
>>
>>59032874
Considering the ass load of merchandise and artwork they've made with all current Eeveelutions together probably not at all
>>
>>59033594
They can just make more merch to shove in our faces
>>
>>59033283
based. people forget that the only reason dragon type is so overpowered is because it's made up of almost exclusively legendary and pseudo-legendary pokemon. on a pokemon with mediocre stats it's just a slightly better normal type
>>
>>59033058
We aren't getting another eevee of a known type again because they don't want to be accused of copying one of the dozens of fakemon that appear when you search "[type] eeveelution" into Google. The only new one we've got since 2006 was Sylveon and that was for a newly introduced type.
>>
>>59032874
What Eeveelution would be next? Why don't they make one for every type?
>>
>>59033672
They could easily make a fighting type evolution that is different but it would mess up the marketing.
>>
>>59032874
Hopefull 100%
>>
>>59033043
>leaks prove they'll never make another one
>>59033049
>leaks prove they're making another one
WHICH IS IT
>>
>>59033043
>>59033049
classic /vp/ saying the exact opposite of itself
>>
>>59032874
0% unless they introduce a new type



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.