[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: wolfey_rankAll.png (551 KB, 1037x681)
551 KB
551 KB PNG
Let's see your rank, btw.
>>
a pokegirl thread died for this
>>
Yea I bet hands are rather triggering for him
>>
>>59057798
>4 hour video
>>
how could barbaracle truly be someone's least-liked mon? It makes no sense. It's not like you need extra info to "get it" like conceptfags spout. If you don't understand that it's a barnacle man you can at least see it's a beefy warrior type mon. He ranked this below conkeldurr, eiscue, incineroar, quaquaval, stunfisk, simisear, klang, rellor, unfezant, aromatisse, garbodor, jynx, bruxish? Really?
>>
>>59058363
Actually in the video he ranked Rellor last so below this one. And Incineroar is in the top 5 btw
>>
>>59058462
Did he rank mega barbacle?
>>
>>59058462
Rellor can't be last solely because of it's shiny being a balls joke
>>
>>59057798
He stated right off at the bat that was the case. He even went out of his way to average in rankings of two other people, but bias in unavoidable.
>>59058462
Of course he did. BaraTigerofHealthMeta is to VGC was CHARIZARD is to everything else. The only reason BTHM was only 5 is because the top 4 spots are taken by KANTOOOOOOmons or Pokémon with Megas (I didn’t want he to the end I’m just guessing). Since those are the Pokemon game freak wants people to like. Not blaming Wolfe btw I’m blaming game team for setting up other Pokemon to fail.
>>
>>59057798
>4 hour video
What’s the complete list?
>>
>>59058501
Only Charizard was. Top 3 were Cress, Groudon, Kyogre. The list is also pretty fucked by only accounting for VGC. I skimmed most of it probably watched only 10 minutes but there is baffling shit like Alomomola being in the 1000s. The list is completely flawed because mons that are great in singles are ending up below shitmons that have zero competitive usage anywhere. I get him favoring VGC but not accounting for singles in the slightest just doesn't make any sense.
>>
>>59058530
Does anyone even care about 3v3 singles?
>>
>>59058363
It's ugly trash, it's down there with dogshit like voltorb, grimer, and the ice cream and cryagonal
>>
>>59058539
I mean he literally said he took every aspect of each Pokemon into consideration, but clearly didn't and only judged them on VGC and how much he likes them/thinks others like them
>>
>>59058530
> like Alomomola being in the 1000s.
Parts of the criteria was “iconic”. The only discussion Alolomola gets is people saying it should evolve from Luvdisc. Though by that metric Cresslia has no business being as high as it was
>>
>>59058541
fuck you barbaracle and cryogonal are cool
>>
File: laugh3.jpg (331 KB, 517x768)
331 KB
331 KB JPG
>>59058462
>And Incineroar is in the top 5 btw
>>
>>59058555
half of all Pokemon probably deserve a 3 or lower in terms of how iconic they are. It's placed below Arrokuda ffs a Pokemon that's obviously worse competitively, he says he doesn't like, and has lower Bulbapedia page view amount since I'm not sure what else you'd even determine iconicness score on.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.