Why is the 4chan staff so angered by wanting to catch em all?
You can't anyway, since gen 3
>>59067880So we're being punished by posting here
>>59067874>>59067880the only mon you can't catch and upload to home on switch is Spinda (you can get it in BDSP, but shitty coding means that you can't upload it to home).If WW has Spinda in it, then it'll be possible to catch em all again on switch 2.
>>59067874In actuality, that rule refers to the opposite of what you assumed. The rule prohibits going against the idea of wanting to get every Pokémon.
>>59067874Based ESL poster with terrible reading comprehension
>>59067874That rule is irrelevant nowadays, same for the other above it since the people who break those rules always get away with it
>>59067874The rule is that you gotta catch em all. I'm pretty sure someone was perma-banned for saying they didn't want to at one point.
>>59067987I don't want to catch em all. Ban me.
>>59067987>perma-bannedIn the long run they're pointless since not everyone has a static IP and people move every few years.It's more or less a determent that serves as an "out of sight, out of mind" situation for the Sharty-compromised moderators.
>>59067987If there was justice in this world, compshitters would get perma-banned since they by default have no interest in catching pokemon at all and just gen them.
>>59067997I would report you but there's no "he didn't catch them all" option
>>59067973You are an illiterate moron anon.
I was always under the impression that this rule meant you could not post the phrase "GOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL"
>>59067905You could have caught and transferred one from bank to home.
>>59068754I know.I said ON SWITCH
>>59068736No, the rule is that you've got to catch them all.
>>59067874It's a leftover rule from when /vp/ was still a fresh board and the mods were at least the kinds of fags who could have fun every once in awhile.Much like GR15, however, it's become unnecessary and deprecated, it's just that UNLIKE GR15, no mods care to enforce the GOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL rule unless it's to desperately try and convince the faggots of /vp/ that the mods aren't complicit and encouraging the current dogshit state of the board.
>>59068932>"GOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL. This will be severely punished"
>>59068923WELL FUCK YOU YOU CAN STILL HAVE A SPINDA ON SWITCH
>>59067880>>59067896am I to understand that by posting this you admit to having not caught them all, anon?
>>59068939Yes the rule is: gotta catch 'em all.There's an old screenshot of somebody getting banned for saying they didn't catch 'em all.
>>59068932>>59069071As the other anon said, it's because it says it will be punished, rather than violating it will be punished.
