How much do you agree with these statements?>If you finish a game on Easy, you did not truly beat it.>If you finish a game on Normal, you did not truly beat it.>In order to beat a game, you have to completely master it and finish without getting hit a single time.
>>10866089Pic unrelated?
>>10866091I just really like the Sega Master System.
>If you finish a game on Easy, you did not truly beat it.Generally yeah, I agree. Easy mode is generally too easy to be considered an accomplishment.>If you finish a game on Normal, you did not truly beat it.Disagree. I think a normal mode playthrough is sufficient to have considered a game "beat". Hard mode is for "100% completion".>In order to beat a game, you have to completely master it and finish without getting hit a single time.See above. I think there is a distinction between "beating" and "100% completing". And even then, a perfect play 1cc without taking any damage whatsoever goes beyond "100% completion" territory and enters into "autistic kissless virgin" territory.
>>10866089If someone finishes a game on easy, then I would say they beat the game on easy.If someone finishes a game on normal, then I would say they beat the game on normal.If you finish a game using the tools the game provides you and nothing more (e.g. no save states or rewinds), then I would say you beat the game.
>>10866120Based reasonable take
>>10866123/thread
>>10866123It's almost as if you think words mean what they actually mean. Are you a grownup or something?
>>10866089>If you finish a game on Easy, you did not truly beat it.some games have easy as default
