/wsr/ - What's that best arguments for reviews of movies b - Worksafe Requests

Anonymous

04/04/25(Fri)08:54:49 No.1522712

File: Mauler.jpg (26 KB, 400x400)

26 KB JPG

Anonymous 04/04/25(Fri)08:54:49 No.1522712 Archived

What's that best arguments for reviews of movies being longer than 2 hours?

Anonymous
04/04/25(Fri)09:06:09 No.1522713

Anonymous 04/04/25(Fri)09:06:09 No.1522713

>>1522712
I do not believe they should, for the record.

But one can argue that an analysis of a work of culture should inherently be longer than the source material, since it includes contemplation of its themes and elements, which would leave a review that's shorter interently incomplete.

Devil's advocate off, you don't need to talk about a scene where the main character drinks coffee if it's detached from any bigger theme of the movie or symbolism

Anonymous
04/04/25(Fri)11:26:46 No.1522727

Anonymous 04/04/25(Fri)11:26:46 No.1522727

>>1522713
Have you ever had a conversation about a song that is longer than the song? Have you ever had a conversation about a line from a movie that's longer than the line itself? That's such a stupid argument.

Anonymous
04/04/25(Fri)14:57:34 No.1522739

Anonymous 04/04/25(Fri)14:57:34 No.1522739

>>1522712
I would say the best argument is that it gets you a lot of views on youtube.