>Wikishttps://dmpdoc.neocities.org/https://web.archive.org/web/20220330105340/https://rentry.org/dmpdochttps://rentry.org/dmprockandroll/https://mu-sic-production.fandom.com/wiki//mu/sic_Production_Wiki----->/g/ makes a 12th albumTheme: everything is single saw/square/sine osc with a simple filterTitle: Let me guess, you need moreDeadline: Midnight between April 30th and May 1stPlease post cover art and theme suggestions>IMPORTANT! READ THIS BEFORE SUBMITTING:Upload the file somewhere and post the link here. If you want to update your track, make a new post.If possible use a lossless format and upload to a file-sharing service, not to a music site like Vocaroo or SoundCloud.Include the title of the song in the post. Don't rely on us reading it from the filename or tags.When you post the submission make sure that the song is clearly a submission for the album, otherwise it might get skipped.Songs that contain anything against YouTube's policies won't be uploaded on YT (but will still be added to the album).If your track's volume goes above 0 dB it will be clipped for the release.>Where can I hear the previous albums?https://rentry.org/dmpalbums-----A board dedicated to all aspects of music making and audio would be great for many reasons. Here's why:https://pastebin.com/ZHXhfRZwIf you like the idea, let 4chan know at https://4channel.org/feedback (under Board Suggestion)-----Previous: >>100045459
Album organizer here.In about a week I'll start the polls for the 12th album's cover art, and the 13th album's theme.You have until then to submit what you want to submit.
>make quick shaperbox preset>vital>ott>shaperbox>ott>eq>limit>hit record while flicking through wub presets and tweaking warp amounts>chords if you think you're a super srs "musician">generate infinite edm soundsI knew it was a useful plugin but jfc it's actually just easy mode this is literally 10x faster than what i was doing before
Guys hear me out.An open source lossless audio format based on WAV that instead of being one constant series of samples, contains any number of tracks that can hold audio files/samples starting and ending at arbitrary points.Basically a barebones DAW project file that only holds samples.You would use it like a normal sample that would simply play the sum of its contents, but you'd be able to expand it and show the internal samples it's made out of, exactly like a comped track.This lets you save space when printing stems that contain long stretches of silence and can be used to handle comping, multitracks, etc. but the biggest advantage IMO would be to have a daw and synth that supports it print each note on a separate track, which is super useful when you want to edit and chop up something you've printed and want to get rid of a tail or something while keeping certain notes intact.Obviously not all instruments and effects sound the same when applied once on the whole thing vs when applied on each track, but like with everything, use it when it's appropriate and avoid it when not.Another disadvantage is that these polyphonic prints would take more space than a standard wav print, so they probably wouldn't be used as the default way to print anything just in case, and would more likely only be used when specifically required, and I guess those cases aren't common enough to warrant adding all this.But I still think being able to open a sample you're chopping (basically like an artifact-free Melodyne) and adjust the individual notes is a good workflow for sample manipulation.Not to mention how it would be cool to be able to buy songs in this format and extract the stems or even just adjust their levels in your player like that thing Kanye and Teenage Engineering made.Sorry for rambling/blog
>>100115125What modules in Shaperbox?
>>100115170>the biggest advantage IMO would be to have a daw and synth that supports it print each note on a separate trackYou are describing a classic trackerIn the early 90s this was the only feasible way to distribute music over the internetIt was also how music worked on fourth generation game consolesIn principle there's nothing stopping you from using trackers this way todayIt's just that nobody bothers to make music that way anymore
>>100115265A tracker can print notes individually but can't do most of the other things I listed, so it's a completely different workflow than what I'm talking about.
>>100115220They all seem pretty good to me aside from maybe some of the distortion, but time module is the most exciting imo.
>>100115318So you're messing with settings in every type of module and it creates good-sounding variations most of the time?
>>100115310>project file is a container for many samples>samples can be arranged anywhere on the timeline>you can open the file and change the arrangement without modifying/destroying sample dataWhat am I missing exactly? Yes, the workflow is different if you use it how it's intended to be used, with a bunch of pitch changes and other effects, but how exactly am I misunderstanding your description?
>>100101232I tried thatThat's for separating voice from instruments and different kinds of instruments from each otherI need to separate two pure vocals that are an octave apart
>>100115764Two similar sounds like that tend to be very hard for software to discern and separate. I wouldn't count on anything being able to do it with acceptable levels of artifacts, but desu I'm not really up to date with the newer AI tools so maybe there's a model somewhere that does it (doubt it desu).Maybe try Melodyne or handpaint the right harmonics by hand in RX.
>>100115732The way you're describing it would also describe any DAW or audio editor.I'm talking about being in your regular daw and working with a sample on a timeline, and if you need to, being able to "open" it and access the tracks inside like you're comping tracks, then close it back up and resume working with the sample as if it's a regular stereo WAV.On the "recording" side, you would have your MIDI instrument print a track for each individual note (so two different C3s would be separate "internal samples" on different tracks), or have one track per MIDI note (so all C3s on one track, all D4s on another, etc), and all the tracks would essentially be groups summed into one neat sample that you can load into a sampler, put on the timeline, chop, reverse, etc. and it would sound like the sum of the inner tracks, which are essentially secret until you decide to open it.If I were to use trackers I wouldn't be able to do those things. I'd just be using a tracker, which is wildly different than the above, except for the single-note thing (which I can also do in any regular DAW, only with a slow workflow).Unless I can drag tracker files into a regular timeline and play with it like it's a sample.
>>100115369I mean I haven't really used pan, width or oscilloscope at all, but those would obviously have sound design uses save for that last one, albeit that's more for near mix-adjacent stuff; it's really more about what shape you're drawing in and how each module interacts.
>>100116035Oh okaySo what you really want is for $FAVORITE_DAW to adopt this type of workflow, and for some reason you described it as if the file format is the main obstacle to making this happen
I have cakewalk, legacy, would you guys recommend it?
EDM made from someone's vocaroo audio on /b/original samplehttps://vocaroo.com/1ic5t6r8Zm4fThe EDMhttps://voca.ro/1aeZCLlI09vAChopped version made by another anon in the threadhttps://voca.ro/1iUYSkkULGpmSuggested version made by that same anon in the thread(sped up from 130 to 160, randomized chops, heavy sidechain)https://voca.ro/1iDYi3ABUFwR
>>100116480You really have zero reading comprehension, or comprehension in general.How can you keep being so cocky after what I assume is a lifetime of being the idiot in the conversation (or at the very least after the retardation in this thread)?Stop wasting my time, I'm not going to continue explaining basic self-evident shit to someone who can't read or apply elementary school level reasoning, and is also rude in the process.
>>100116658EDM from /pol/https://files.catbox.moe/b4kza3.flac
>>100116658Are these AI?What was the thread about?
>>100118583Nope. I made the first and third one myself using my bare hands, the second was by another Anon. It was a vocaroo thread where the OP expected others to post their voices in the thread. I decided to sample his since I figured no one was going to be posting in it.>>>917220111
>>100118970>archived threadhttps://archived.moe/b/thread/917220111/
>had to upgrade my interface so I can use my monitors for my 404I'm lucky shit is so cheap right now. I do hate that I have an extra interface that I'll never use again. I wish I had music friends to share things with
I accidentally recorded one of the tracks in mono and it has completely ruined my dubstep.I am sad.._.
>>100115265>In the early 90s this was the only feasible way to distribute music over bulletin boardsftfy>It's just that nobody bothers to make music that way anymoreplenty of people still use trackers in current year.>>100116035>>100116681> literally describes an akai mpc sampler or tracker> NOOO! THAT'S NOT ITfuck off, schizo retard. nobody gives a fucking shit.
>>100114739Hi, regular song uploader here. I have been sucked into playing Dragon's Dogma 2. I'll start my tune the day before cut off and hand it in just before the cut off. Probably.
>>100119571>wouldn't it be nice to have a vacuum cleaner attachment that can flex and become narrow to easily clean tough to reach spots?>use a toothbrush like in the military>a toothbrush can reach those spots but is different from a flexible vacuum cleaner attachment because x, y, and z>you're literally describing a toothbrush schizo retardThis is how stupid you are.TRD.
>>100120135> noooooo everyone is stupid except me> HEAR ME OUT, GUYS> nooo! that's not what i mean!> nobody knows what schizo actually means> This is how stupid you are.LMAO. you just have no idea what you are talking about and anons barely give a fucking shit about your schizobabble. this isn't reddit or /mu/, so we don't have to entertain your mental illness at all - ever - not for a fucking moment. kill yourself or go back.
>>100120258You're right I realize now that you posted this that I was wrong and that I'm a schizo retard.Thank you for opening my eyes and showing me the way.
>>100119571I don't want to argue with the other guy anymore but>plenty of people still use trackers in current yearTrackers pretty much always supported some kind of effects, and these days the most popular ones (like Renoise, which I use sometimes) even work with pluginsMany plugins are not portable to different DAWs, or have nondeterministic output, e.g. if you use a synth with the oscillator phase set to randomAnything like that would make no sense in the context of the kind of format he was describingBut never mind that there's dubstep to be made
>>100115125Damn I never tried shaperbox but I'm loving it. I gotta look up actually good plugins and use them, it's real easy to make something cool with it.>inb4 post itIt's shit. I just used it to turn a pad into a trance gate thing without fucking with automation, real nice.
>>100121024If you're who I think you might be I'm sorry for being mean to you.
>>100122716If who you think I might be is who I think you might think I might be, I think who you think I might be is not who I amEither way I was honestly trying to understand your idea and I'm sorry for pissing in your oatmeal in the process
>>100123013>oatmealIt deserved more attention over synth1 t b h
inconsistent syntax and non-linear modulation in vital is literally ruining my life I fucking
>>100119551oh no!
>>100124209noooo i'm old like you guys I hate new music ! D:
>>100114679absolute chad there
>>100116681Go code it and let's see how this disruptive design performs in the market.
>album anon counting all the tracks that didn't get submitted due to the bad theme
>>100126999>that we voted for
Should I start recording my farts? I’m a gassy person and probably rip ass at least 100 times a day. Some are so potent they could start a fire.
>>100127453https://voca.ro/1cLfFDo4xEyk
Maybe one of you fuckers knows since /hpg/ is useless.does anybody make a relatively inexpensive four band parametric EQ about the same size? Had picrel back around 2000 in my car, so I know it's possible.
>>100128450>About the same size as a Schiit Magni
>>100119551just duplicate it, now it's stereo
>>100129229And invert the sine wave for maximum SQ.
>Florida Studio>Alabamaton>Puerto Riper>Iowig>Georgia Band>Logigan>Cubexico>Oreson>Acidzona>Pro Texas>CakewuckyThe Digital Audio Workstates of America
bump
>>100130174>using Oregon twicengmi
>>100131866You mean Oreson and Logigan?One's Oregon and the other is Michigan.
>no information about pricing whatsoever>when pressing unlock it says something about forming a contract you cannot get out ofwtf is this scam
>>100132301oh my badforgot michigan existed
>>100132347I wish I could as well
>>100132308I hate pretty much everything about iPhones but the music apps alone are almost enough to switch.The situation on Android is a borderline tragedy.
>>100132347>>100132675Fuck you guys. And Wisconsin...for all that is holy keep your cheese covered hands off my UP or we'll ship all the niggers from Detroit and dune coons from Dearboarn to you. I'd rather let the syrupfags have the UP.
The acid to ableton pedal combo gets me so wet @.@
>>100133632explain what you mean? like using pedal as a tubescreamer on a 303?
>>100133330>ship all the niggers from Detroit and dune coons from Dearboarn to youWould be a legitimate improvement over sconnies.
>>100133703Might be true. I have seen quite a few Code Blue Cam videos regarding La Crosse. You guys even have a T-Rex, I'm kinda jealous.
About to release a new version of my Midi app... fucking hell it took so much refactoring work to make THIS possible. Just to popup little confirmation boxes. I probably shouldn't be using EF Core, it's a pain in the ass...
>>100130174>>100133330Wistudio One
What the hell is this?https://youtu.be/E3AGo_bOagACan somebody explain? I don't even know what to listen for.
>>100128450Behringer
Are there any pre-made Ableton midi tricks, racks, groups, macros or whatever for quickly sketching up drums or percussion sequencesPianoroll drawing everything from scratch is so fucking painfulAnd don't answer with hardware
>can someone make all my music for me so i don't have to spend 2 seconds programming a drum patternfuck off
>>100134356>tricksMate you gotta learn your DAW.If you can't get a drum "sketch" rolling within like a minute you're doing something wrong.
>>100134384why are you always so mad
>>1001342871. I said parametric, that's not a PEQ2. If I'm going to spend close to $200, I'll just get the Schiit Loki Mini+ to go with my Magni+.Considering picrel and just run the thing off of a 12v wall wart. Don't understand why nobody makes a small desktop PEQ for home use.
>>100134356You can try the piano roll generators and transformers in version 12, or perhaps some M4L step sequencers.Another option is to beatbox a basic percussion line and use the audio to midi to get a midi track out of it. You will have to clean it up, so there aren't really time advantages to this method, but it can be good for creative reasons.
>>100134069>>100133330UP is rightful wisco clay
>>100134463NTA, but "parametric" implies that it has controls for Q and bandwidth, etc. per band. You posted a graphic EQ/tone control with knobs instead of sliders.
>>100134544Valid point. I'm running on 3 hours of sleep and didn't notice, forgive me. Which means the Loki+ probably isn't parametric either. Now I'm gonna have to go hunt down a used Audio Control Four.1 from 25 years ago, pray I can get one for under $100 IF I find one, hope the pots aren't shot and it doesn't need to be recapped.
>>100134626No worries anon, I wish you the best of luck. I don't know much about the market for that or I'd offer a more helpful answer.
>>100134415disdain for retards
>>100134544>>100134626>>100134657Well fuck me...>>100128450 is only parametric for the bass. FFS. The hunt continues. >>100134539The fuck it is. Come fight me faggot
>>100134666Holding onto anger is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die-michel scootpro tip if you have no emotional regulation: just close your eyes and *don't* read dumb things
Found one! And it's under $100!
>>100134707No, he's right. Retards must be told they're retarded for the greater good.His only mistake is to think he's not a retard as well.
>>100134855Found a 4 band for half the price too.
>>100134707holy projection>>100128450>>100134463>>100134855>>100135049off topic, not relevant to the thread
>>100133330>DearboarnUm it's DearBORN and DearBORN Heights, thank you very much!
After buying your first sampler, synth or piece of equipment how long did it take you until you made something on it? I feel like I'll be studying this 404 for a while until I make something on it. Which is fine cause it's fun. These can be intimidating if you rush yourself though so I'm trying my best to keep a good slow pace.
>>100133675Mhmm, just pedal on any 303 patch goes hard lol
Can I use my Digitone for this? It's only sines with harmonics and feedback control + fm
n00b hereHow the fuck do you get your midi synth hooked up to reaper?I can get the microkorg to send midi to Reaper but I cant get the synth to play midi. I have everything set to channel 1 and like I say it half works
>>100136446how many midi cables are you using?
,... what's up with the vital wavetable spread? it only spreads *every other* voice? it just doubles up on two... just in case I detune it or what??Matt Tytell angers me :|
>>100135375Last I checked, PEQs are used in studios and for mastering. Hence relevant to music production.>>100135512Yeah I know, I'm a filthy phone poster. I literally live 5 minutes from Dearborn Heights via Telegraph. You know, US-24.
>>100136844not your shitty headphone amps
>>100136656two and they feel like they are both securely connected. unless they just aren't?
>>100136870And? Still relevant to music production and not off topic. Get fukt.
https://youtube.com/v/RFlQ-oervY4
>>100133675
>>100137558obfuscation of communication as a means of engagement and ideological conversion through meme warfare while deflecting all accountability is unironically top 5 threats to humanity right now.I have no idea what you're trying to say and I hate this image.
>>100137648beats me, just felt like posting
>>100137662I can't make any other 303 patch sound as good as massive and it's bothering the fuck out of me
>>100137678why do you need any other patches loljust spam it and wiggle the filter
>>100137648Supposedly there's people who hate the 303 because "it's not a real synth". I never seen such a person though.I think rather of all gear out there, the 303 is the only machine that is universally loved.
>>100137648ok libtard
>>100137728the fact that you know exactly what i'm talking about makes it that much worse
>>100137703more variety of sounds I need moar filters and goofy wavetables squelches bro>>100137711these people sound made up
>>100137558this image makes no sense>>100137711>zoomers repeating things they heard other people saystop repeating bullshit
>>100137711The 303 is utterly despised by many people who have actually used it
>>100138195not her, agree it sucks dick to program but i've never heard anyone complain about the sound (not talking about on release when it was a bass replacement like the tr were "drum" replacements)
https://voca.ro/16gvpPFnRjABMade something on the 404 today. Currently giving roland my money to get these project banks to save myself time on finding samples.
whoaaa so this is the power of buying hardware instead of using your daw's sampler...
https://dsp56300.wordpress.com/ostirus-downloads/
>>100119551Tell me it's some cool shit. Fuck that, lemme hear it. https://youtu.be/nsYg1uXgdug
>>100138195I did. First off it you're having a hard time put in new switches, they're easy to get and because it's such an old device easy to solder.Then the 303's sequencer isn't about methodical composition, and nobody uses the song mode.The pattern chaining is what it's all about.And finally this isn't the 2010s there are dirt cheap authentic clones with midi.>>100137962Late millennial actually I did own a genuine one in 2012-2016 but traded it for a modular.>>100138417Fun fact: The sound of the 303 comes from the slide and accent circuitry, how they interact with the envelope and the central offset of the env filter modulation. Repeated accents drive the filter and resonance higher and higher which acts sort of like a synced lfo.The oscillator and the filter have almost nothing to do with it, at least not for the typical distorted acid lines.>>100137763What I have actually seen are well meaning advice ala "don't get a 303 as your first synth, it will be too limiting"Which is bullshit. You can also sort of make kicks when you slide from a short high note to a low long one with accent engaged.You'd just get a short "beep" before the kick but that can be turned into noise with feedback or simply muted.
>>100139082>"don't get a 303 as your first synth, it will be too limiting" Which is bullshitbro?
>>100139104looks like some ai shit or copied from reddit
>>100139082>there are dirt cheap authentic clones with midi.Does that include the Behringer Bevelfish or whatever
would a 303 be valid for the album theme with no dynamic filtering
>>100138599I'm glad you liked my beat : )
>>100138417Had real 303 for years. Very easy to program. >play notes in step sequence>play steps, rests and slides in >twiddle knobsBought Behringer 303 clone. I have no idea how to program the thing. I've read the manual multiple times and watched videos etc. It makes no sense. Why would you make a clone device and then alter how to make sequences with the device?
Loaded up some kits onto my 404. It takes so long to load samples but I also made a 8 bar loop while at work just now. I would've never learned any of this working in a DAW. The 404 makes the learning process more fun than a daw.
>>100141858Behringer is a crud company that steals almost everything and sells it to morons.
>>100144568yeah. It also sells everything very cheap and some of it is quite good quality. The Crave synth was quite nice for the price. As are their euro clones of Mutable Instrument stuff. Oh wait. You're calling me a moron too. lol
>>100144568behringerslop will outlive us, i see those mdx series rack units all over the place
When you guys talk about the 303, do you mean the actual synth and its emulations, or about any "303-like" sound the same way people talk about 808s?
>>100141610Probably notIt always has some amount of filtering and saturation no matter what the knobs are set to, and I think there's some weird asymmetry toot. tried to write an emulator one time
>>100146326>>100146334>"303-like" sound the same way people talk about 808guilty
>>100146334I usually say "acid line" when talking about the actual sound, while noting that it's really fucking hard to get good acid sounds out of any arbitrary analog or VA synthThe original hardware is prohibitively rare but purpose-build emulations are good enough that it doesn't matter
https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx8eDoRiCogpqgPo91uS4aZHn6XjqIyari>Oscilloscope view time is over. Because of "object reference does not point to an instance of the object". I don't know how to fix that. This happened when i downloaded "visual studio 2019">And now I CAN'T USE ALL OSCILLOSCOPE RENDER PROGRAMS. SidWizPlus, SidWiz2, Corrscope, OVGen are useless now!Wtf? How does this work?Are all oscilloscopes running on the same dependency that VS19 happens to mess up?
>>100147024sounds like a windows dependency got changed and the software needs a specific version to interact with the os
>>100147117Yeah I think you're right.Didn't expect a single dependency to affect all those oscilloscopes at once.
>>100147222it probably breaks a bunch of other things, not just scopes. classic m$
do any daws support arm windows yet?
>>100147591sunvox runs on everything
Dae can explain the vital rotate knob?Is it just haasing?? What do you do with it?I hear immediately you can do some dumb stuff with it on mono signals but it's one of the few parameters I still haven't made much creative use of yet
I want a KO II so bad but why the fuck did they have to lock it down to a fucking web app? what kind of fucking sampler becomes a paperweight if a website goes down, who does that shit
>>100148215LMAO what a cursed timeline
>>100148215Because their target market is the same as apple
is there an ez mode way to tune looping samples (looping fast enough to be pitched) or do I have to sit there looping my kick in simpler into a tuner feeling like an idiot??Something about sample lengths in sampler but I feel like that would fuck things over in a way that simpler won't...on some old school autechre shit because to-do list
>>100148281have a track that plays a reference tone and tune the samples against it, then remove the track later.
>>100148774err i'm talking more about the slides into tones than the actual tuning.The only exact ratios I have memorized are 1:2 and 1:3 for fifths obviously so like the percentages for looping don't really seem practical for this.Notes track once you get it initially and I'm just experimenting based on every simpler parameter atm but I was just wondering how other people went about it...like obviously AE and the real autists just jump over this hurdle with their coding or whatever
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=BkBhGD4FV-g&list=OLAK5uy_lciDJFsua9VgO_sJckDqXy8tH_1a5bkt0how to wrap my head around jazz in terms of music theory or whatever? i guess in pure technical fidelity this recording is impressive for being half a century old, but musically...??
>>100148854i'm sorry, i don't understand what you mean
>>100146334when i say 303, i mean exactly the 303 or a vst emulation. i assumed others did too
>>100149130
>>100114679Anything besides Frooty Loops with Audacity is shit.
>>100149130a pile of 2-5-1s. find standards you like and study them, different recordings of them, etc.they took a popular song back then and converted the chords to things jazz improvisers could use while still keeping the simple melodies.https://youtu.be/StM6blsh-Xg?t=68https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzLBA5kCP1w&list=PLIuyaIoM30LKWzL4cazFXy4TRArYEI4dh&index=2if you're a beginner or don't know music theory then all this is useless though
>>100149321E.g just holding a C on my current kick patch looping 100% of the sample would give me a C, looping 50% would give me a C an octave higher....... I already made a tune with it so idc now really but I would have liked to automate that loop length to "slide" into different notes with more accuracy.
>>100149497the more harmonic content in a sample, the shitter it tunes when pitched. also the further you pitch, the harder it is to stay in tune. if you look with a spectrum analyser for the fundamental and next few partials, you can see what's going on.
>>100146403>t. tried to write an emulator one timegot any resources you can share on that or filter design?
>>100148215Wait is that true? The only way to put samples on it is through a web app? Please say sike
>>100150057not her but the 303 is notoriously difficult to model, the kvr threads have some discussions. it's more how the circuit interacts with itself that defies how synths are typically programmedthis guy's site has a bunch of stuffhttps://www.timstinchcombe.co.uk/index.php?pge=diodehttps://www.timstinchcombe.co.uk/index.php?pge=diode2filter design isn't important to learn before you have a testbed set up (pd, max, juce vsts, etc). get that done first then worry about filter shit.learning enough electronics and how to model the actual circuitry is sorta orthogonal to what we actually care about in programming music effects/synths. it helps to get the basics down before diving into something as weird as the 303 is for digital modelling.
I am once again proposing we ask Chris Johnson of Airwindows for his take on a 303 filter !
>>100146655>it's really fucking hard to get good acid sounds out of any arbitrary analog or VA synthIs that a common experience/opinion?I've never thought of or heard of people calling acid sounds particularly difficult, but then again I haven't tried making them on *every* synth and I don't habitually lurk production forums outside of 4chan.The only deciding factors that come to mind are filters with nice resonance and ease of use through envelopes (you'd think that was a given but stuff like built in velocity control and trigger resetting isn't standard, go figure), and a nice distortion.Obviously the jump in quality between acceptable and genuinely exceptional is significant, but that can be said of pretty much any standard sound.
Do u have a ritual for music making? I have to smoke and walk 2 miles before I'm comfortable to sit down at my desk.
>>100150794coffee and vidya for an hour while listening to music similar to what I want to make that day and taking note of things to try as I hear them every morning.
>>100150553there's no such thing. the 303 sound is a result of its design and circuit components interplaying with each other. you can maybe try using comb filters to get squelchy things but it won't sound quite the samehttps://old.reddit.com/r/TechnoProduction/comments/vlfphq/303_envelope_driving_me_up_the_wall/
>>100150890thank you for crushing my dreams by education
>>100149497tuning your samples by ratios is literally JUSTing your shit up
>>100151037>JUSTingJUST checked and apparently I never backed up the lfo tuning preset I made for vital RIP(it worked but it was useless)
Ok new version of my MIDI app is out. Pretty minor changes, but should be more stable and easy to use (you won't lose unsaved changes anymore). I'm open to any thoughts or feedback or feature requests.I put the download link and the "getting started readme" at this pastebin: https://pastebin.com/LCANzbX7Video with audio: >>>/wsg/5524020 (it's a low effort bad one)https://is2.4chan.org/wsg/1713911721711100.webm
>>100150266god damn that looks complicated, I had no idea the circuit design would factor into the sound so much. I guess I should learn more about modeling circuits first, maybe try to emulate an atari punk console or something.thanks for the links.>filter design isn't important to learn before you have a testbed set up (pd, max, juce vsts, etc). get that done first then worry about filter shit.I have that set up, QTSynth allows me to hear my code immediately. Only real filter my basic ass program has is from here http://www.nicholson.com/rhn/dsp.html#2 and it sounds pretty boring and weak.>>100151070nice, i'll try this out. Usually when I try to make music I use Renoise to send stuff to my program through loopMIDI.
>>100151325since you have that part then i recommend will pirkle's vst book, the art of va filter design by zavalishin, and dafx
>>100151325>nice, i'll try this out.ThanksJust a little background in case you haven't been following: it's supposed to be for live production, so everything happens in real time, though I don't know if it's feature complete enough to be able to do an actual performance.
>>100136844>Yeah I know, I'm a filthy phone poster. I literally live 5 minutes from Dearborn Heights via Telegraph. You know, US-24.We live right by each other wtf.
Thoughts on the new Virus TI/Snow emu from the dsp56300 project?download linkshttps://dsp56300.wordpress.com/ostirus-downloads/https://futurenoize.com/dsp56300/builds/ostirus/Rom filehttps://files.catbox.moe/7ulr7s.zip
>keep getting distracted by making my own project sound banks im just going to knock this all out tonight cause if i dont ill keep doing this every day instead of producing
>>100151783is it a clone of the firmware or just someones project trying to emulate it? Will all my virus soundbanks load into it?
>>100152235Not him but this is the same project that made the previous Virus emulationsAs with those, it runs the stock firmware, so the sound it produces is bit-level accurate to the hardware (assuming there are no emulation bugs)>>100150793Depends on the kind of acid line you're trying to makeYou can do a basic squelchy sound in any synth, even crappy 2005-era VSTs, but really nailing some of the eccentricities of genuine 303 glides and envelopes is just impossible with a lot of synths
hm,,,https://vocaroo.com/1eP4qpiI4uYd
>>100138586sounds good>Currently giving roland my money to get these project banks to save myself time on finding samples.lame as fucking fuck. you have a sampler - use it to sample things.
>>100152409When I can find a way to rip vocals from songs I like so I can steal the parts I like thats the plan. I have plenty of sound packs with samples to chop. Isn't that the point of this? Load up a sample, take the part you want, add whatever you want, export. I spent a good amount of time today picking samples and making a project bank. It takes a long time cause only choosing shit I think sounds cool. I'm trying to do 1 project bank a day so I'll be full of my own original sounds in 2 weeks.
>>100152487>When I can find a way to rip vocals from songs I like so I can steal the parts I like thats the plan.izotope rx series of tools. pretty good at extracting just vocals or whatever you like.>Isn't that the point of this? Load up a sample, take the part you want, add whatever you want, export. I spent a good amount of time today picking samples and making a project bank.nice. i'm so tempted to buy this 404 thing.
>>100151783gigachad with the links>Thoughts on the new Virus TI/Snow emu from the dsp56300 project?it's awesome. i was using the earlier version they made and it too was awesome.> rom filethanks to you i can finally run it. the roms i had didn't work with it and couldn't find this firmware. are there any other roms for this?
>>100152553>izotope rx series of tools. pretty good at extracting just vocals or whatever you like.pretty sure ive seen this name on rutracker so ill look into it>this 404 thing.im only on my 2nd year of producing but its probably my most fun purchase yet. i have a lot more fun sampling on this than on ableton. probably because its portable so i have been using it during my smoke breaks and my morning shift at work. loading samples is a long process cause its one by one but you can just drag and drop from ableton preview to the app
>>100152748What Ableton theme is that?
>>100152765riparian
I don’t get why /dmp/ hates the MPC.
>>100152748>cymaticsthat is objectively too many sample packs
>>100152748>pretty sure ive seen this name on rutracker so ill look into ityep. it's where i got it from.>im only on my 2nd year of producing but its probably my most fun purchase yet. i have a lot more fun sampling on this than on ableton. yeah i'm kinda over daws for this sort of thing. i find it easier (and more pleasurable) to just use fasttracker 2 or renoise for beats / hiphop. i want to transfer stuff i made with trackers and daws to something like a 404 and then go mad chopping shit up until the sun exhausts all of its fuel. i can't do this easily with ableton, they're too many steps and things to do before you get to that. (also why recent mpc also caught my attention but the specs are shit).
>>100152945>i can't do this easily with ableton, they're too many steps and things to do before you get to that.why
>>100152877nobody here hates the mpc. have you considered taking meds?
>>100152955>have you considered taking meds?Of course not, I'm a gentile.
>>100152952> whybecause ableton's UI is trash, its sample chopping feature is not even close to being accurate or on beat, it was like this whole process was an afterthought for the developers. i don't like using it. i'm constantly having to fix things due to timing issues (that pitch shifter/fixer isn't great either). it's all round not a very enjoyable experience.
>>100152931im skipping everything with loops im only putting one shots, hits and things of that matter onto the 404. i already know how im going to group the sounds for each project. >>100152945>can't do this easily with ableton, they're too many steps and things to do before you get to that.I understand what you mean. I really struggled with learning how exactly to sample. the hardware makes it a lot easier cause you arent having to switch screens a lot or add in a bunch of other VST's to get into experimenting with sounds. it makes things a lot more fun and hands on.
>>100152983Ableton kinda sucks for MIDI too.
>>100153004
>>100152773Thanks
>>100152983>its sample chopping feature is not even close to being accurate or on beat, it was like this whole process was an afterthought for the developers.the sample chopping is easy as shit, people have been using it for 20 years no issue. what is this brain damage that all you guys have where you can't even bother to learn warpinghttps://youtu.be/pXZWYyDNZ4k?t=60>>100152995>the hardware makes it a lot easier cause you arent having to switch screens a lot or add in a bunch of other VST's to get into experimenting with sounds.you don't need any other vsts to experiment with sounds? you never even learned to sample
>>100152995>I understand what you mean. I really struggled with learning how exactly to sampleyeah, it's not the most straight forward of things (at first).>it makes things a lot more fun and hands on.indeed, anon. devices like that are great. i first used the boss sp303 when it came out and thought it was brilliant so i've liked these kinds of samplers ever since.
>>100153070>you never even learned to sampleyeeh, i got the 404 to learn>>100153083i like the colors on this
>>100153025>ableton salesman is offended
>>100153004it's fine for basic shit, not really cubase or fl tier.
>>100153122fl studio seems like the equivalent of the unity engine for adhd aggy daggy babbies, not really an appropriate tool for making top tier music
>>100153204Never used it, kiddo. Are you imagining some epic rivalry where everybody who thinks Ableton is trash is a FL fan?
>>100153070people bitching about the ui sucking and ableton being unusable when he's making sick beats on a 4:3 crt with windows xpzoomers lmao
>>100153070>the sample chopping is easy as shit, people have been using it for 20 years no issue.>posts video demonstrating anon's gripes with softwarewhat did anon mean by this?>>100153106yea looked cool in the dark as it glowed.
>>100153228ableton and fl studio seem like the most reasonable options for a beginner, and ableton is generally praised for its features and is under active development, you can even do just intonation, the complaints about the piano roll are really minor nitpickinghttps://tuning.ableton.com/just-rational-intonation/intro-to-ji/
>>100153238> be apollo brown> used nothing but cooledit pro 2.0> still uses it in current yearzoomers absolutely 100% btfo.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0pzSviYh9Q
>>100153242those aren't gripes. that's literally using any software for sampling and you make your own touches with how you choose to chop things or put them on the grid or in relation to the grid
>>100153258>ableton and fl studio seem like the most reasonable options for a beginnerNah they're garbage. Get a beginner set up with a tracker, an MPC, anything but Ableton or FL.
>>100153283>t. brainletmost youtube tutorials are on ableton
>the daw doesn't just pump out music for me, it's shitthe state of /dmp/
>>100153297Yes... Indian tutorials.Ableton pays influencers and advertisers. Doesn't mean it's good. Or that Destiny is a good debater just because he's promoted on Jewtube.
>>100153299right, a piece of music could be worth millions of dollars, i'm not looking to play with a fisher price toy and that's it
>>100153302this anon gets it. >>100153299>seething this hard over a dawlove to see it
>>100153333i'm not seething over a daw. i'm seething over people spreading false information
>>100153344It's not false information, some people think Ableton sucks for various reasons. They're valid.You're an Ableton salesperson so of course you're going to seethe if people don't want your shitty product you're sure to advertise in every thread, extensively. Nobody fucking cares about your DAW or you. You ain't shit and your hair ain't neither.Now take your mom's computer and go home.
>>100153344>i'm seething over people spreading false informationI use ableton every day, and it's accurate information.
>>100153302Dumb logic.The existence of Ableton shills doesn't preclude the existence of good Ableton tutorials as well.I'm sure Indian Ableton tutorials exist, but I've never seen one in over a decade of watching Ableton tutorials so they're extremely rare.
>>100153554Nobody wants your Jeetish Ableton garbage videos, nobody cares about if there are Ableton video tutorials. Shit you can find tutorials on using Cubase for the Atari on Youtube too. It's not some great advantage to have thousands of garbage videos.Stupid fucking shill.
>>100153554>over a decade of watching Ableton tutorialskek you must be mozart by now lol
>>100153593Meds.>>100153603I am.
>>100153632Who needs a full DECADE of tutorial videos to learn how to use a DAW though? Like what aren't you getting?
>>100153644Is this a real question?I'm not watching tutorials that teach how to use Ableton.I'm watching all types of music production tutorials that teach whatever they're teaching using Ableton.Some times they're teaching a universal DAW-agnostic thing, and some times it's something exclusive to Ableton, but it's not the fucking day-1 "how to use Ableton" tutorials about the DAW itself FFS I shouldn't have to explain this.
>>100153869It just sounds like a big waste of time. Just stop advertising your DAW in every thread and there will be an end to the horror.
>>100153879Ok.
>>100153869> never ending storyamazing story btw. wouldn't read again.>>100153632>I am.you might think you are but we all know that's nonsense.
>>100153603mozart is mid
>>100154560100% and the other dude from the movie was a much more talented composer :^)
>>100154560Mid 30s when he died? True :^)
>>100154618>>100154631mozart was good at music in the way that jacob collier is good at music, it's just an NPC tier meme that classical music is sophisticated, implying richfag/high social status snobbery which is utterly distasteful by modern standards as there's a cost of living crisis and an ever growing wealth disparity, freaking detestable audiophiles listen to classical music, normal people not so much because it's archaic and deprecated
this academiafag couldn't even tell mozart and pokemon aparthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0M5LHTrMh8
>>100154732That priest who just be quoting star trek in their sermons for years and none of the audience ever questioned it lmao.Extremely over rated. Nobody actually believes that shit.
>>100154727You're ALMOST good at this if you're making me consider defending Mozart when I don't fucking like his music at allWell memed my friend
>>100154560let me guess you like mahler and philip glass
>>100150057>>100150266>>100150553>>100150890https://faustlibraries.grame.fr/libs/vaeffects/#vediodeladder
>>100153004>t. Max4Livelet
>>100155370ugh nomaybe if companies would sell a license for life but the shit is stagnant between major releases all of which cost moneyno for me it's purely hardware driving a MIDI-based setup, i'm just doing this for fun and i've been up to it for a whilei just recently finally managed to get my hands on an RS7000, I unplugged all my other junk and am working my way through the manual now, it's quite wicked
>>100155456>which cost moneyugh no
>>100155495>y-you can't spend money on a hobby! that's crazy! you should pirate softwareyou can do certain things with the RS7000 that you simply can't do with your computer, kiddo
>>100155580You can do WAAAAYYY more things with a computer that you can't do with hardware.
>>100155456So your gripe isn't with the program itself, but only with its pricing model.
>>100155621Pd is free and does the same stuff. I don't really see why you'd want to pay for Max. In fact Pd has its own advantages being newer. They're both by the same guy. Miller Puckette.
>>100155608Baloney.
>>100155665First you say that Ableton is bad for midi because it's expensive (???) then you say this.There's zero chance you're not baiting.Please stop my guy. Please.
>>100155700>First you say that Ableton is bad for midi because it's expensivenope, didn't say that anywheredidn't read the rest, you're a curious little bugger...
>>100155718This chain:>>100153004>>100155370>>100155456Not going to continue responding.
>>100155700> seething this hard over a dawyou keep confusing anons out of rage. i'm the one that had gripes with it, that still uses it every day regardless, that posted the screenshot of me actually using it. you just can't seem to comprehend with that last iq point of yours how someone could dare criticize ableton and dare to use real hardware. pic related.
>>100156401>only 2 collectionsyou don't use ableton
5:48am time to open the 404
>threadly reminder
>>100157118>he doesn't open it during work hoursYour job sucks, might as well make some tunes when nobody's watching
>>100158118I actually do bring it to my job. I got an 8 bar loop started I'm going to add more once I get home. I don't have co workers so it's easy for me to get away with music while working
I want to sample my vinyls eventually. Don't wanna waste my money on a bad player though. Anyone got a suggestion
>>100158837You could always just get the $150 audio technica player assuming it has some line out Otherwise I don't really know what you're aiming for unless it's decreased groove wear or something since the tech pretty much hit its peak in the 60s/70sHere's a reddit thread that might be useful if your budget is massive thohttps://www.reddit.com/r/turntables/comments/13jocpn/best_turntable_for_1000/
>>100158837you don't need a DJ turntable to sample records
>only one submission so fargrim.current submission is nice tho
>>100156461Stop trying to sell Ableton in every thread. Nobody likes you, Ranjeet.
>>100159837
>>100156401Who made the previous posts is irrelevant when this post >>100155456 responded to a discussion about midi capabilities with a point about pricing.Ironically, you're also confusing Anons because this post >>100155621 is my first in the discussion lol. Not that who says what is relevant when you can discuss ideas directly rather than being sidetracked by who's angry and who has ulterior motives (all baseless and made up in your head based on what's convenient to believe for your narrative of course).The ony directionbrained retard here is you for thinking that if anyone dares to respond to a critique of something it means that they're raging and running to its defense just to save its honor or something. You really can't fathom the idea of someone disagreeing with a critique because apparently everyone secretly agrees with you on everything lol. Must be why you didn't bother to actually address Anon's actual counterargument here >>100155370 and are only talking about the fact that we're "defending" Ableton at all.Also, this post I'm responding to is the angriest-sounding one in the thread lmao, zero self awareness.I'm also not going to continue to respond to you, as you're either trolling or a troll-level retard who's bot worth the time anyway.
>>100159837Don't worry I have a Penismank© track cooking
>>100159837Aren't the rules like... you can't use drums or anything? It has to be just sine waves?
>>100160095>Aren't the rules like... you can't use drums or anything? It has to be just sine waves?have you ever tried putting a pitch envelope on a sine wave with a short decay amp envelope?
>>100160095what the other anon said but also noise is allowed so you can make drums with that as well
>>100159585>>100159629I don't want an expensive DJ table table. My local store has a lp60xbt. I'm assuming that'll be enough?
>>100160110>a pitch envelope>a short decay amp envelope?>Theme: everything is single saw/square/sine osc with a simple filter>a simple filter>aAlbum anon here: multiple envelopes not allowed
>>100160197Fine, pitch envelope followed by compressor with slow attack
>>100159837I accidentally made this a while back, is that okay for the album?https://vocaroo.com/1adLJ6zF4LSW
>>100160232Hmmmm ok I'll allow it>>100160267Yes, it's great, added! (pls upload lossless format)
>>100160232Organizer here. This >>100160197 isn't me.Any envelope and LFO that isn't so fast it affects the timbre is allowed.
>>100160304Kek cmon man don't make me start using the trip every time I have to post as the organizer.
>>100160359Album anon here, who is this scam lord?
>>100160267Yes.
>>100160373https://desuarchive.org/g/search/tripcode/u98UQVL010o/
>>100160304>>100160374I still want to tweak it a bit but I'll upload a .wav afterwards.I'm also working on a less accidental track but that one is giving me more difficulty at the moment
>>100160404You can do it Anon, I believe in you.
>>100160395Hi
test
osterone
>>100160395
>>100160677LMAOOO based trip generator.Where's the other exclamation mark?
>>100160693from memory two is more secure and harder to generate but it's been a while
>>100160720Harder for you maybe.I can generate them just fine.
>>100160901RIP album organizerNeed to move the rules offsite at this rate
old people are delusionali woke up at 6am and my day feels so fuckedi've been trying to work on a song but all i've got going on up there is fog of war>>100160267sounds fun!
>>100160047damn look at this wall of cope, you're a touchy little troon
>>100159837Yeah I'm not gonna make it
I don't get why certain anons (you know who you are) dedicate time to shitpost in /dmp/ and attempt to ruin the albums.I rarely use /dmp/ anymore, it's so shit now. I suspect more anons are going to leave, there's better places to discuss music production.
>>100163034where?
>>100163034my cope is that it's still doing better than /gg/ and /prod/ on /mu/
There's a nonzero chance that this >>100163034 is also part of the troll.Also this very post.Trust is over. This is /dmp/'s conspiracy era.
still can't tell if trying to make the album song in renoise was a mistake but all i know is that my workflow is vastly slower at the moment. feels bad to be this software illiterate...>>100163982if everyone is false flagging then no one is.........(i am actively making this board worse by continuing to breathe)
>>100164019>by continuing to breatheKek
>>100164019I'M FALLING BACK INTO BEGINNER PRODUCER TRAPS AGAIN FUCK
Newfag here. Just wanna make some lofi or hip hop beats on mp3s i downloaded from google. Rentry is too much. Can someone feed me what software should I use to get started thanks
>>100164880>Make beats from scratchProbably reaper since it's trialware or whatever the hip kids call it. You can find some drum plugin if it doesn't have one and start writing beats, adding fx, etcReaper also has lofi tutorials on youtube >Sample beats you downloadYou can just do it in audacity honestlyTechnically you could probably do everything in audacity but after a certain point it's just too much effortNo real tutorials afaik but if you learn what effects you need it's pretty self explanatory for most things
How viable is Ardour + FOSS plugins for making metal/rock music? Is there a better FOSS DAW? I have guitars and a drum set, I'll eventually get some mics for the drum set. I don't want to fall into proprietary stuff, but there's not much info out there compared to the wealth of info on say Ableton.
>>100163034>I rarely use /dmp/ anymore, it's so shit now.this, there are obvious shitposters that just derail the threads>I suspect more anons are going to leave, there's better places to discuss music production.this but there aren't other, better places
>>100165017>reaper lofi tutorials on youtubeIt looks cool thanks anon I'll try this out
Every time I a/b compressors across similar gain reduction and slightly tweaked settings the results are pretty much indistinguishable when i'm doing initial processing autism on the drum buss.Pro-C on clean versus glue for feed foward obviously.Pretty much every other setting can be easily achieved with the stock ableton compressor with a few caveats (punch just emphasizes the attack more, pumping just has a different recovery whenever it's doing sidechain pumping are the main ones; I can't figure out what the vocal setting does but it's definitely different )Very few situations where you get benefits over stock compressors.Really makes you think.
>>100166047not me, i think people who need to buy hundreds of dollars of compressor plugins tend to be retarded. muh la2a, muh 1176, it just FEELS right. same with ssl/pultec eq shit. most of this will be completely transparent if you match settings for 99.99999% of use cases
>>100166145Imo there's definitely something to be said for investing in a piece of gear that helps you accomplish a result faster, even if it's something you can do on more basic gear you already have.That said, that difference in speed is probably due to not taking the time to learn or wrongly assuming it can't be done in many cases.
>>100166219agreed, also a big problem is people make compression out to be way harder than it is
>>100151779You a Redford anon too I take it?
>>100160901Fake, you are album anon, make this one then
>less than a week leftI could go for a little extension t b h
>>100166047It's not that they don't sound different, but most of them don't sound different enough which is a problem with software compression. Pro-C is not really a great sounding compressor so it's got that in common with the Ableton stock Aside from a couple workhorses, the Acqua compressors are the only ones really worth having as they actually compliment the material. I don't know what people are smoking who think UAD or Waves sound good. Some of the recent ones by Slate are decent (=not ugly sounding crap) >>100166145You're not supposed to gain match them, the whole staging could be different, plus you got different release curves and program-dependent behavior etc. A good Pultec is invaluable, try wide boosting the highs by 12dB on a regular EQ and see where that gets you. An EQ that lets you do wild shit without butchering the material is rare. Same with a 76, you're supposed to slam the living shit out of your snares with them and not every comp is up to the task. It will suck the life right out. The Opto ones have entirely different use cases, but I haven't heard any plugin that sounds like an actual 2A, except maybe Aqua's El Rey which isn't even a 2A but can be applied similarly. It's weird how everyone accepts a 303 is difficult to emulate but a tube compressor relying on fucking photocells is somehow different.
>>100167261This is probably the most contrarian post on software compressors on 4channel i've ever read.Are you adamant that compressors should colour sounds or do you just have a really specific idea of what compression is supposed to sound like?I've legitimately never seen anything but praise for glue lol
>>100167354He is a literal acustica shill
>digitakt>but 2>"little box of magic"whoaa
>>100167511ohh okie thanks for explaining :3
>>100167354It's easy to reach that conclusion seeing as how often compressors are used just for the color, but that's not what I meant with complimenting the material. Even with a transparent comp like Xpressor the gain reduction just sounds better, the material doesn't lose depth even when you push it, rather than just being ham-fisted with the material and ruining it. With most S/W comps you have to be careful and fine tune it a lot, you need to use lighter settings if you're not going for the OTT sound. And I can see how it's easy to lose interest in a million plugs behaving the same. BTW I was referring to Ableton's regular stock compressor, the Glue comp is fine.
>>100167511I'm not, I'm a hardware shill for comps. but if that's not an option, or cloud alternatives like mix analog/access analog, then the R2R-ized acustica stuff is a decent substitute (fuck their copy protection), or just use the stock comp, what do I care.
outsourcing my compression to the cloud like a boss for the win
>>100167088Nah I don't feel like it
If you don't release officially/professionally, paying attention to shit like the difference between compressors is pointless.If you do, you should have a proper mixing engineer care about that shit for you.Bottom line, as a producer it makes no sense to worry about minute and barely audible things like that.
>>100168964Oh, where to begin...Do people on the whole really not understand skill/knowledge informing other skills/knowledge?what you’re saying is as stupid as telling people it’s pointless to learn how to read unless they want to become an author like??!I’ve seen this similar like of thought in retarded takes by other “creatives” and its never not dumbfounding
>>100169044Diplo doesn't know any of that compressor shit.
>>100169087I saw a tiktok the other day with pics of MIA and the search was "MIA becoming what she hated" ???I wanna know but I don't want to hate her :|
>>100169161dude she's always been a rich poser lol
>>100169184posing as what...??
>>100168964basically thishttps://youtu.be/WwF91IRgBE0?t=377if you can't get shit right in a static mix first with volume sliders, all the plugins in the world won't save you. so many people default to chucking in a bunch of plugins on a track/buss without even getting a solid mix first. they create a bunch of problems for themselves instead of solving problems
>>100169288>youtuber slopdon't carewho the fuck doesn't know to level first lol
>>100169322people who throw the fab filter suite and other slop onto their channel before even mixing
>bump limitFUCK!!!!!!!
new>>100170188>>100170188>>100170188