File: 1494475682359.png (241 KB, 905x638)

241 KB PNG

Pedophile loser failed life Lole
loser his family and friends and community would regard him as a menace if made aware of his views we can only lole so hard for this poor loser
lole faile

if you had balls you'd say pedophiles

>>13110775
imagine thinking sex isnt a human right

interesting threads are being made for your enjoyment on https://boards.4chan.org/s4s

Your fortune: Average Luck

>>13110809
it technically isn't
people equally have the right to not have sex as they do to have sex, meaning you can't force it to happen against someone's will

>>13111008
you said so yourself they have the right to it, ops post has nothing to do with forced sex it just states it's a human right which you agreed it is dumbass.

>>13112201
I said it technically isn't
If you're confused, you could have simply asked for clarification instead of being rude, because now you owe me an apology, and I don't own you an explanation
Fortunately, I am very nice, so I will provide the explanation for you

First, consider this logic:
"This cup of water is full!"
"It technically isn't. It's equally full as it is empty."

Next, consider that you stated that "ops post states it's a human right", but it doesn't, it instead uses the word "deserve", which is a technical difference.

Now, let's actually talk about human rights. These are agreed upon treaties written into law. Passive human rights ensure no government or authoritative interference. Active human rights are about the provision of something.

As an aside; the people who use the phrase "trans right are human rights" don't understand this. They imagine they have a "right" to the things they want at the expense of others. For example, their "right" to be provided the permission to enter a female changing room violates the passive privacy rights of women.

There is no human right to sex, but it is passively implied by reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. However, these also encompass the active provision of protection and care to prevent unwanted sex. There is especially an active duty to protect children.

The premise of this thread is that pedophiles don't get to have sex because children are wrongly being forbidden from running into their arms. This is an inversion of the truth. It's the OP that wants the child, not the other way around. Any other scenario is wishful thinking, erotic fantasy.

Finally, consider that children already have sex. There are laws in place to protect them from abuse, but two 15 year olds voluntarily engaging in sex, for example, while technically violating law, isn't realistically going to have any prosecution. Laws exist as useful tools to help people. Even certain acts of pedophile sex may go unprosecuted.

slaughter pedos

File: 1786091921536.jpg (219 KB, 1152x2048)

219 KB JPG

>>13110773
they do. especially her

>>13110775
my dad wold probabbly hate me more if i was gay lole

>>13110809
>imagine thinking sex isnt a human right
>>13112614
>states it's a human right", but it doesn't, it instead uses the word "deserve", which is a technical difference
>It's the OP that wants the child, not the other way around.
What makes you the expert do you go around asking children if they want to have sex?
>There is no human right to sex, but it is passively implied by reproductive rights and bodily autonomy.
So basically it's a human right

Stop making yourself look even more stupid you dumbfuck

The question is not whether children should be having sex, its whether adults should be having sex with children, which is no and you should kill you're self.

>>13112684
You're being very stubborn and rude when you had a chance to learn something
Preserving your online ego, even when you're anonymous, is more important to you than getting free education
That's pathetic

I will respond but only to your further questions
No, I don't ask children if they want to have sex, but that isn't a requirement to know that sex generally doesn't interest prepubescent children, and that pubescent children probably don't want to have sex with the 4channer advocating that he should have access to children

This is the third time I've had to tell you this now; no, sex is not an explicitly stated human right.
It seems to me you're taking out all your worldly frustrations regarding your lack of idyllic sex on me, merely for explaining the situation to you.

>>13112688
you can have sex with 16 year olds as an adult in most 1st world countries btw

You are not allowed to have sex with children, cope and seethe trannies

>>13110773
whats up with 4chans pedo trend

>>13112721
well, 4chan is one of the few places that is anonymous, so people can say things they wouldn't normally say
maybe there's a pedo trend everywhere, but people just normally keep it hidden

>>13112721
Its on anywhere semi anonymous, it is rampant on discord