>Have to sift through millions of irrelevant AI voice generated pajeet tutorials on the most simple workflow need in Blender>Finally find something good>Follow procedural texture node tutorial>Get every value and node exactly as it's shown in the video>Finally get to plug it all into the material output node>Instead of looking like the tutorial, the model turns completely black>Trying to learn procedural texturing has now been derailed and I have to waste an entire afternoon troubleshooting because this software was made by the antichristOpen source was a mistake and Blender trannies should be lynched.
filtered
>>1029683wanting software to work is not a big ask
>>1029686If it works fine for the tutorials and not for you it's your fault, not the software's
>>1029686>use different version of program>complain that things turn out differently compared to the tutorial why don't you get a job if you like work so much
>>1029683>>1029690>>1029701>Blender trannies are THIS delusionalabsolutely baffling
>>1029681>not using dedicated 3D materials software for the task, nor using a workflow for make 3D materialsyou failed from the beginning
Can you make nice textures in Blender? It seems pretty limited. Using multiple vertex colours is a fun solution but i don't know how you'd get to 20% of what people do in substance designer. Really what i'm saying is, i should probably buy a sub to substance designer
>>1029713>Adobe
>>1029713You can. I just use a pirated copy of substance because it's easier and gives better results. That's not to say it's impossible though. Like most things it comes down to being a skill issue.You watch a professional artist color something in using kids crayons or the kind of markers that are $2 for 3000. It looks professionally done because they have the skill to do it. Other people who lack the skill to do it complain it's only because they don't have a full set of Copics.A useless cunt blames his tools etc.
>>1029723>A useless cunt blames his tools etc.such a tired and worthless saying
>>1029681Stop watching indian videosBuy a fucking book
Blender is the true redeemer, the fiery crucible in which all true heroes are forged. You think you can learn this from a video? The only thing you'll learn is the existence of European accents you didn't know were possible. You either make the doughnut or you get baked like a doughnut.
>>1029723A useless cunt blames his tools because a professional would never use total fucking garbaget. Freshly fucked up two months of sculpting work because I was too cheap to use good clay
Inspired by this thread i tried making a texture in Blender, it's not entirely procedural i used a graphic for the top pattern. I feel like you need more tools to do it well, selecting concavity / convexity for example. Its fun with geometry nodes because the control is real direct but i think Substance is probably going to be better. I want to look up how to make it better now, some people make real nice textures.
>2026>wanting software to work properlythanks for the laugh OP
>18 minutes into a 20 minute procedural texture tutorial>OH BY THE WAY I FORGOT TO MENTION, THIS ONLY WORKS IN CYCLES NOT EEVEE
>>1029681>I am too retarded to even follow a instruction video step by step made for retards.>It's the softwares fault.It's a you problem
