[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Settings Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
05/08/16Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!
[Hide] [Show All]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: sciguide.jpg (9 KB, 200x140)
9 KB
Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.

If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.

If you want help with your homework, go to /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests.

File: blood_Glass.jpg (141 KB, 728x728)
141 KB
141 KB JPG
got waitlisted by ucla
should i kill myself
8 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I got waitlisted by UCLA and into Berkeley. Really wanted to go to LA though. Berkeley is great academically but the campus culture kind of blows.
File: IMG_6226.png (378 KB, 1200x1169)
378 KB
378 KB PNG
Haha all these babbies.
Idk why some of you guys cry so hard about undergraduate school. Isn't gradschool what really matters?
>he cries about rankings
>for undergrad

File: gJJ5tzA.jpg (110 KB, 550x850)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
Are they memes or are they worth listening to?
32 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
He's got a few research publications listed under his name.

Has anyone checked any of them out to see if they're any good?

I can't read ebonics

>Tysen's only expertise is astrology.


How low is your IQ
Because gender isnt even a scientific concept lol it is a social construct. Unless you are talking to social scientists, their response would be infinite lol
>comparing carl sagan to neil tyson and bill nye

fuck outta here idiot
carl sagan was the real shit
those other guys suck

File: image.png (833 KB, 720x937)
833 KB
833 KB PNG
Is the Higgs boson real? There are not many news since they 'found' it.

What kind of news are you expecting?
File: Capture.png (136 KB, 625x382)
136 KB
136 KB PNG
A final determination of the spin of the particle would one thing that normally would have been reported.

I think it is likely that there has been no news because the real news is that they did not discover Higgs' scalar boson, but actually discovered the vector boson predicted by Tooker (me.) Look at pic related which is the current entry in the Particle Data Group publication. (PDG is the source of record record for all things particle physics, not webinars broadcast from CERN.) You can look at the other particle data entries for the other fundamental particles (http://pdg.lbl.gov/#) and you won't see any of this roundabout language about what the particle is labeled or called.

Five years later, PDG still won't touch CERN's claim that they found the Higgs boson. The particle almost certainly has spin-1, in agreement with my prediction (http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0037) and if so it proves that I am in fact the world's greatest living physicist, but the crotchety old cowardly cunts who pretend to that title don't want to admit that someone so unlike them is so vastly superior to them in intellectual affairs.
>BREAKING: The Higgs is amazing!

>A final determination of the spin of the particle would one thing that normally would have been reported.

Not suited for mass media obviously.
File: Capture.png (287 KB, 837x376)
287 KB
287 KB PNG
I hope you are not so feeble minded that you think this paper reports the spin of the particle. They compare spin-0 to a few decay channels, but to make a final determination they need to compare the data to ALL LORENTZ INVARIANT amplitudes for [math] H^0\to\gamma+\gamma [/math] not just a few of them. There are only about two dozen such amplitudes (https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2288) and they still have not published the results of the only analysis that matters: how the data stacks up against all possible spin-parity configurations. It is absolutely outrageous that

1)they have not published this analysis in the five years since they found the particle

2)no one is calling bullshit on this outrageous abortion of science

This analysis is completely easy to compute, they have had sufficient data to do it for years, yet they do not.

If you guys are so smart why arent you in the most difficulty field of all cognitive science. Little boy and his mathematics. IT's not even like you understand thats just a non responsive language.
40 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
Because he's a babby that doesn't know C.
He also doesn't know PEP8.
Congrats on taking cs101 in code academy
Cognitive science is just an umbrella term for the direction some researchers in linguistics, psychology, AI, neuroscience and philosophy (and some might say anthropology, but this is less true now) take. All these fields can be understood as trying to model cognition in some way or another. I don't know what your field of study is, but neuroscience by itself says very little about cognition. This is why research in cognitive neuroscience is always going to be very interdisciplinary, especially with psychology. There's not trying to investigate cognition through neuroscience without relying on higher-level psychological models of cognition. What you seem to advocate is a purely reductionist methodology for cognitive science which, if you worked in the field, you would know is utterly useless.
Because thats the sign for menorah, and its on psychology because its a jewish invemtion and thus honoring them

File: 1.jpg (183 KB, 793x835)
183 KB
183 KB JPG
What does /sci/ think? Will this help me escape brainlet-mode?

36 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
This also looks like the text a low IQ would type...
While being smart makes you adapt faster & esier to harsh situations, if you get into debts,bankruptcy or other vicious cycles, the streets aren't that far...
"It only happen to the others" mentality,right?

Drink cups of broth when you're hungry. It takes the edge off, and also gratifies 'want food'. I myself /still/ find it difficult though, after a day you may not be hungry but you have a sense of lack, related to food. It's hard to explain. It's good to be distracted by, eg, work if you can.

This would explain why when you eat after you're hungry you feel extremely tired. It's cause your brain is overlocking its gpu and when you finally eat that survival mechanism/ boost in cognition dissipates.
File: 142914288244.jpg (34 KB, 499x499)
34 KB
>172 cm
>242 pounds
>137 IQ

so if I loose weight and do sports I'll be more intelligent?
Maybe their "well fed" IQ is not 65 but 50.

File: IMG_20170425_001035.jpg (106 KB, 1200x658)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
Bill Nye: I'm a scientist

Also Bill Nye:
95 replies and 14 images omitted. Click here to view.
Yeah, well that's the whole point in their argument
They're effectively re-defining gender to be different from sex, since sex is biological (there's no arguing that), but they are wanting to claim gender is more social based, like what I said about how you identify, rather than your biological sex.

If they were smart, they'd ditch the whole word gender altogether and just come up with a new one which means exactly the same thing, but isn't redefining a word, that way no one can argue with it.
>come up with a new one which means exactly the same thing, but isn't redefining a word
But you're acting like this is a concerted, conscious effort by a small group. That's not how language changes.
Language is a spectrum.
I agree completely anon. It seems the definition of gender is personality but anyone can make one up to describe themselves. And with pronouns, we should just use them in accordabce with sex as that is easy to tell and doesnt require people to remember made up words
>we should just use them in accordabce with sex as that is easy to tell
Well not all of us go around groping people's genitals

File: FaceApp_1492664601852.jpg (37 KB, 256x256)
37 KB
I want to go into artificial intelligence but I don't have money for college.
What are some good textbooks/channels/free online courses/Internet forums I can use?

The only problem though is I fear ai may be too complicated for any one person. It would require knowledge of programming, discrete mathematics, and electrical engineering at the minimal.
Networking is needed to communicate with other ai, Internet, etc.
neuroscience and biology/bioengineering background would be extremely helpful
And knowledge of psychology and sociology would be needed to refine it

That's a lot of material, so also what are some suggestions as to how to get into this social niche?

>I mean better ai than what was used for pic related
Also philosophy would be crucial

Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach by Russell and Norvig
Probability and Statistics by DeGroot and Schervish
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning by Bishop
Information Theory, Inference & Learning Algorithms by MacKay
Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems by Dayan and Abbott
Sutton's book
undisputed champ book for RL

AIMA is a staple


is cool

forgetting some ml books, but can't remember them off the top of my head

File: 9MRZ54c.jpg (597 KB, 936x1369)
597 KB
597 KB JPG
What the single biggest setback to science that's ever occured?
259 replies and 23 images omitted. Click here to view.
>/pol/tard fails at logic, episode 9765823
It is possible that the pace of my many continued discoveries in the years 2009-present might have been lessened had I received the accolades I deserve in a timely manner. However, they may have been hastened had I acquired some collaborators.
Of course there wasn't a Dark Age in territory not controlled by the Cucktolic Church.
Bill Nye the sex junk guy, just set us back 20 years in the global warming awarness by associating himself with the most despicable human beings.

File: wmn.jpg (396 KB, 1170x1170)
396 KB
396 KB JPG
You've got two decks of cards. Each consists of numbers from 1 to 20. After you mixed all, you deal them out to two people. What's the probability that one person has at least one 1.
13 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Fuck you are right I got what you mean now.

It should be P(A or B) + P(A and B)

Fuck I'm done with this shit
wait fuck me,
P(only first 1) + P(only second 1) + P(first and second 1) = (2/40)*(38/39) + (38/40)*(2/39) + (2/40)*(1/39)

final answer
Alright alright my final answer
Previously I did not take into account card replacement and the chance of both happening

A = First person getting a 1
B = Second person getting a 1
B depends on A
Both are not mutually exclusive

P(A or B) + P(A and B) =
P(A) + P(B) - P(AnB) + P(A) * P(B/A)
P(A) + P(B) - P(A) * P(B/A) + P(A) * P(B/A) =
P(A) + P(B) = 2/40 + 2/39 = (78+80) / 1560 = 0.1012820513
10% probability lel

I'm not sure this is correct.
This guy seems to know his shit >>8863353

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
since you've mixed all of them and dealt them
Justified by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle

So if you've dealt all of the cards and the set contains two ones, you can guarantee that one of these people has a one

>evolution is still considered sound science despite its many shortcomings
How do you justify the amount of ad-hoc and bias present in this supposedly scientific discipline?
46 replies and 14 images omitted. Click here to view.
bacteria spontaneously evolved to digest a new chemical, that had never been consumed by that bacteria.
Reminder that taxonomical classes are after-the-fact classifications of organisms observed to exist, not a preexisting scheme that organisms were later slotted into.
>Taxonomically relevant threshold
A literally meaningless phrase.
You understand how unlikely it is for things to fossilize, right? And then how unlikely it is that we'll happen to stumble upon it later on, yeah? That is why there are "gaps". Because fossilization is uncommon.
Reminder that evolutionists tried to make neanderthals into ape-men, despite them being fully human.

File: chemists-do-it.jpg (74 KB, 500x655)
74 KB
Tripfagging while shitposting. You are the cancer of this board.
File: 474.png (64 KB, 1200x1200)
64 KB
This is not a /sci/ tier shitpost.
Not even a Nye tier.
This is ASAPScience's tumblr tier.
I'm getting a hemorrhage.

File: vs.png (213 KB, 768x448)
213 KB
213 KB PNG
>The master of us all
>Humble and amicable
>Friend of all children
>Son was a mathematician
>Cool formula for polyhedra
>Published a shit ton, wanted to share his knowledge with the world
>Memorized the entire Aeneis
>Simple and pleasant signature
>Devout christian
>Smiles in his portrait
>e^πi + 1 = 0
>Pure of heart
>Calm and collected

>The prince of mathematicians
>Raging egomaniac
>Gave zero shit about children

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Your post is very autistic, but I pick Euler.
Euler is my /sci/bando

File: 1473858914236.png (358 KB, 552x543)
358 KB
358 KB PNG
Assuming you are not bound by any physical laws, design a space that has the following three properties:
>travelling between two randomly chosen points always takes a finite time
>it can fit an infinite number of 3D objects inside
>it is realistically possible for normal three-dimensional interactions to occur (so you can't just say "just have 4D space" because attempting normal 3D interaction would be like holding two infinitely-thin pieces of paper and having them touch edges)
12 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>Any two points must have a path between them that is finite in length.

Hmm, can length ever be truely finite though? I mean, if you can continuely add percision to the measurement when you look closer, is it technically a kind of infinity?
>Hmm, can length ever be truely finite though?
Both in a mathematical sense and a real world sense.

> I mean, if you can continuely add percision to the measurement when you look closer, is it technically a kind of infinity?
No. Something finite can be made out of infinitely many parts, at least in mathematics.
In reality everything has to be finite.
Every Lorentzian 4-mfld satisfies the above.
im assuming you want length defined by the metric, but how about volume? do we have to define that with a sigma-algebras over the metric space?

if there are no constraints, just use normal euclidean space with normal volume and define the discrete metric. then volume is infinite and all distances are equal to 1, thus finite, and 3 is automaticly satisfied
also I assumed you want a space where the distance is bounded by some number M, otherwise this whole thing is retarded and almost any space will work.

File: 57c.jpg (261 KB, 857x1202)
261 KB
261 KB JPG
Who are the all time most important people in STEM?
26 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
I want the popsci children to go away
Oiler and GauB
If we're talking about STEM in general, in terms of overall impact across all disciplines, it has to be Euler and it's not even close

Laplace maybe a close second

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.