I, for one, am glad that such a pseudo-intellectual endeavour as maths has been exposed for what it is and reduced to inglorious verification of machine-generated output. As if there was ever anything great about maths or mathematicians. First they were 'savants', glorified human calculators, basically mental slaves that are somehow drawn to the most boring task imaginable, and then they kept on endlessly chaining reductionist logical statements in the hope of proving such consequential and physically relevant theorems as whether a 20-dimensional ball can be squeezed or if there's a 0.00000001 chance that water blows up spontaneously. Finally, we're free of the tyranny of soulless, boring and anti-social autists, and humanity may thrive once again in a golden age of literature, arts, philosophy, metaphysics and theology.
>>17056173>It does not matter that they understand that "not all music is art",It does. It makes them more capable of rationality than you - a biobot operating on purely on syntax ("M=A, LP=M => LP=A") with no semantics.
>>17056179>i contradict myself because i am a free thinkervibes and gut feelings but no logic, like all npcs
The windowlicking tard doesn't even remember what the exchange is about. He thinks it's about a consensus on what specific artifacts count as art. If he had any theory of mind, he would've realized the stuff a particular person regards as MERE entertainment isn't stuff that same person regards as art. That's already enough to undermine the notion that art is mere entertainment to most people. You don't need a consensus on what, specifically, makes good art. But wannabe STEM autists are basically animals so he doesn't get it even if if spoonfed.
>>17051853Up until the 19th century math was based. For the last 130 years though:Yes
>>17056195>indian reply syntax>You don't need a consensus on what, specifically, makes good art. That is what your cope boils down to. You get hung up on trying to justify that art isn't entertainment (which I agree with) yet trying to uphold that science is just meant to be glorified engineering (useful stuff to create more product), when both derive from the same underlying principles (being cattle, which you are). You could not provide a single argument for either without outing yourself as a massive NPC. But you get hung up on dismantling the analogy that you don't realize it's one own goal after another. You can chimp out at opinions I don't even hold though about hypothetical retards just like you.
No nursesNo premedsNo adviceNo psych patients
>>17055918>shitboxcars have to be less than 15 years old
>>17055920Cue "ruined by uberjeets"The regional service where I live has a max fleet life of 5 years.in which they expect at the least 400.000km out of those vehicle. Quite a few will never make it that far, due suffering extensive maintenance needs at 200k and then 300k.
>>17055369i chose it for many reasons: good pay, decent hours, schooling wouldn't take as long as medschool, work anywhere you want, i have a lot of family that are optometrists so i already understood what i was getting into, and i find contacts/glasses/vision therapy interesting/fulfilling. while ophthalmology/surgery was interesting, i didnt find it interesting enough to go to medschool and only have a chance to get ophthalmology and maybe be stuck with some other specialty. thinking about it now, i dont think i would mind if i was a different specialty as long as i didnt have to do translated exams all dayi would recommend it to others if you are interested (in the US). my state pays quite well for optometry (130k median for bls) and i got a job for 150k with production bonuses and came out of school with about ~250k in debt from undergrad+optometry school. it's also nice to be practicing in my mid20s rather than only getting out at early/mid30s from medschool. i was also thinking about the future and how optometry gets scope expansions every once in awhile due to not enough ophthalmologists coming out and staying in practice since they retire early or work just a couple days a weekout of the three you listed, pharmacy has been and will continue to get shafted the most. online pharmacies, more automation, etc has really fucking up pharmacists' future career outlook. i think dentistry is the most secure profession out of the listed ones due to various procedures they do, but optometry is pretty secure too. optometry is probably one of the best professions if you want to own/run your own solo or group practice since it doesn't have a lot of initial equipment you need to purchase and you don't need a giant area for it (except to display frames). that's another reason i went into it since i originally planned on taking over a family member's practice when they're ready to retire, but i've been having some second thoughts lately but we'll see
How chill is veterinary medicine? I would love to be a horse surgeon or some shit if it meant that I wouldn't work with retarded colleagues.
>>17056289>horse surgeonI love horses. They're so cute :)
what are u supposed to do with ur cum? i just cum in the toilet and flush it or i cum in my boxers and put it in the washing machine lol.
Mathematically speaking, whatever your brain has decided to do with it. Flush it, slurp it, stick it in a stew. The world is your mollusc; you're free from societal obligations to conform.
>>17055955ur supposed to put it in a woman
I caught a cockroach eating my smegged toilet paper in the trash the other day. Watch out, another creature consuming it could give you a negative reflex creation image. And you won't know where it's coming from, when it surrounds you.
What traits and human functions are being proactively selected for by the baseline conditions of the average technological society?Pic mostly unrelated
>>17055386obedience
>>17055798WAGIE WAGIE don't you lieAll day long you want to dieNEET is single, free, unchainedNEET has wealth of time, undrainedNEET protects his vital essenceDelights in waifu Schierke's prepubescenceWagie does the best he canTo quell the rage, shame, humiliationBut wagie knows in heart of heartsWould not be wagie if had the smarts
>>17055649Brownoids are unironically more human than nu-whites by those criteria. The only item on that list they outdo nu-whites at is having no internal monologue. Nu-whites are exemplary bugmen and in fact, traditional white values are all striving towards this outcome.
>>17055919by which criteria?you're saying brownoids are less docile and submissive?I'll believe that when they compete in extreme sports and don't sit in their caste level, cowering in cow shit
>>17055923>you're saying brownoids are less docile and submissive?it's funny when amerimutts call blacks and browns violent but then come up with shit like thismake up your mind, the contradiction won't help you resolve your deep cognitive dissonances
TLDR: Science is made up garbage and scientists sell themselves for money.
It's math. I can understand when /ic/ had complete meltdown when AI start to spit out quality arts. But come on, did people here really think computers of all things wouldn't out do you at..math?
>>17055835Oh. Turns out you were right. "He" (do corpo spambots have genders) literally can't answer (>>17055836).
>>17055823>What I see here is something that couldn't draw hands yesterday, is drawing these today, which makes me wonder what else it can draw tomorrow.Hmm. Well, you can iterate tomorrows to infinity and the best case scenario for this tech is that it'll draw whatever people were drawing yesterday.
>>17055859When I say "this tech" I mean every possible derivative of diffusion models and or other alternative rooted in modeling scraped human data. But I'll be looking forward to sentient artificial humanoids showing humanity how to progress beyond its aesthetic limits, in approximately Two More Weeks. :^)
>>17055560Funny, the clankers won't support you or let you be part of the cool guys club. They won't acknowledge your existence
>>17055823saar
New research shows China leads research in 90% of crucial technologies & ignoring this means we're living in a delusional bubble, where we still think the West is the Sci-Tech leader.I think a lot of people are in denial, or just can't accept that China is already the world's leading nation for science and technology. I can't blame them for their ignorance. Most English-language media studiously avoid mentioning it. Time and time again, I see topics like AI, space & robotics covered, with only developments in Western countries talked of, as if China doesn't exist. Despite the fact that it's now the leader in so many fields.The problem with complacency and ignorance is that it gives you a really distorted map of reality. You can't understand how the 21st century is developing without factoring in China, and ignoring China means you're being delusional.Source:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04048-7https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/aspis-critical-technology-tracker-2025-updates-and-10-new-technologies/
soos
>>17053664India.
/sci/ moderators are chinks lolol
such fucking bugs
>>17054814>>17054816kek
>P = NP>just subtract P from both sidesWhere is my milion $?
>>17054181no you don't it not how it works lol
>>17053474Am I missing something or this seem more like a logical fallacy? I know a question which is easy to prove the answer, but is impossible to calculate>I am thinking of a number. Guess what number I am thinking of.
>>17054905Your question does not take the shape of the type of question P vs NP is asking about. Its more specific than simple any question that is hard to solve vs easy to verify. It stuff like seppuku puzzles or the travelling salesman
>>1705490567
>>17054905I think you just have to write a program that decides all true Godelnumbers
stringking42069 predicted that Sabrina (“The Next Einstein” à la 2019) is going to write a few more useless throwaway papers, and then inevitably sell out to AI within a year since her entire ouvre has been vaporware. I tend to agree; she was a fake from the start. She is still hanging on with some outrageously good positions she is under qualified for; but for how long though ?Let’s predict her future.
>>17054384Very good points, the fast talking was not striking me as characteristic of scammers so far.If it interests you, this jewish crypto scammer was what i was referring to, he released some useless trash "product" but had to sell it as the next revolution.https://youtu.be/ugF9kZW2pGw?si=rl6XoCBmhde3ZKnF&t=220You can start at the timestamp and just analyse how insecure he is to not talk anything wrong that can be used against him or that shows that there is no substance. I think he is a perfect study object how scammers talk he has many more of these interviews. He managed to convince many people that he was some kind of genius developer. He walked away with 100 million btw while the token went to 0...
>>17054392>Caroline is hot
>>17054384https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EunS6JEAAAAJ&hl=enShe has an h-index of 28 lol. She is obviously not the next einstein or whatever retarded shit the media says but she is not a grifter.
>>17055751>last paper from early 2023 with 20 pages and a jeet coauthorYeah strong grifter vibes
>>17056141Ók nvm im retarded she still makes papers.
Is Trofim Lysenko the most vindicated man in the history of science? >mendeloids dni
>>17055780>dni>>>/tumblr/why do brainlets love digging up literal whos who published some bullshit that they then have to spend tens of thousands of wasted characters justifying with mental gymnastics?>no, listen, if you interpret all his drivel that did not work and was objectively wrong with modern findings-You people will come up with any old bullshit to feel smarter than everyone else, except none of you actually contribute anything of value to academia.
>>17055783Im more interested in the psychology of people like you coming here every day attacking every non mainstream post.
>>17055828What a fucking cope. One meme line of text one meme image. MUH NON MAINSTREAM SCICENCE
>>17055828what non mainstream science? This entire board is 90% "non mainstream" """" science"""" and when you prod the vast bulk of the shitposters they never even studied the subject they shitpost about, and when anyone points that out they usually scream "appeal to authority".
>>17055871>>17055878Yeah the psychology of you guys. Why do you come here and seethe about people with no credentials bringing up their special and interesting theories? You know you dont have to visit this side?
>we seek in vain for a reason why one should be preferredYeah because in 1914 you did not know about CMB which is the preferred frame in cosmology.>we FEEL forced to postulate they are equivalentOh you FEEL? Really? FEELS? Based on outdated facts. Thats what modern physics is based on btw, while attacking everyone arguing in a way better metaphysical waySource: Mach's principle : from Newton's bucket to quantum gravity and it was from a 1914 einstein paper
>>17055842As i said it doesnt matter (you can see it that way or define the redshift as change), this is all a strawmen, einstein made a FAR stronger claim which you ignored >>17055833His claim was "we cant find a sufficient reason why we should use a frame as REFERENCE system, not preferred. And since cosmology uses CMB as REFERENCE frame, its over for relativists.
>>17055844>since cosmology uses CMB as REFERENCE framedo you understand what reference frame means? Do you understand that the reference frame being a common standard does not imply that it has explanatory power? For example, what changes when you switch to Anon's green frog dick reference frame, doyou obtain different results?
>>17055873>the reference frame being a common standard does not imply that it has explanatory powerThen frame your theory without this explanatorily-worthless fictional entity. :^)
>>17055875"Manifolds can be expressed coordinate independently" is kinda the first thing I would have expected you to have learned from the introductory topology lessons that that GR prerequisites. Coordinate frames are locally emergent, and I do not recall that sufficiently shitty GR solutions have a reason to have a single reference frame that can reach every point in space.
>>17055873>For example, what changes when you switch to Anon's green frog dick reference frame, do>you obtain different results?Yes, the expansion of the universe and the cosmic redshift would be highly anisotropic. But again, thats not even what einstein suggested, einstein made a way harder claim.
Euler’s papers would have been considered not rigorous today and would not have passed peer review
>>17055699Euclid’s sandbox was essentially unpublishable in its original form.We call this progress.
>>17055699Euler would have written them differently had modern publishing standards and frameworks existed at the time, and consequently would have had zero problems getting his findings published.
>>17055699most of math papers are fixed through AI for 40 dolars + some of you guys are too slothful to type into latex and take ss and send them to AI hence ur argument is debunked.
>>17055699If Euler was alive today he would be mainstream and you faggots would celebrate some loser faggot who accomplished nothing in your endless pursuit of clout through contrarianism.
>>17055984>DEBUNKED
Several prominent tech figures have been claiming the Hodge Conjecture (another Millennium problem) has been solved. How big is this?
>>17052201A non-perturbative quantum field theory probably is the "something deeper" you are looking for. Whatever new method the solution discovers would be a replacement for the standard model and probably immediately suggest all sorts of new physics to explore.
Humans living in the best timeline. Human mathematician can now just be like "do your thang lol" to LLM and chill while thinking machine works, then claim result as theirs. Magnificent. People used to have seeing eye dogs, now we have thinking brain machines. Don't hate on the differently able.
>>17051903>>17051925Fitizen mathematicians? Based. I can't even do long division.>>17052025How can it be hard if it's not proven? How do we even know it's real?
>>17056083What is real? How do you define "real"? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then "real" is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
>>17056095nta but real is that which has consequences you cannot avoid.like you can have your fantasy world where you slay the dragon and in that case it's not real because you can slay the dragon. if a dragon were to be real you wouldn't slay shit, you'd get splattered/burned/eaten alive. you wouldn't be able to avoid that consequence going against a dragon with a sword.
Does cycling destroy testicles and fertility? Looks like the science is split about this.
The places in the world where people cycle a lot like the Netherlands and Denmark don't have any fertility problems relative to everyone else. So the answer is clearly no. Unless it's their immense chad virility that allows them to take the nerf to give everyone else a fair match, I guess.
Men should not ride, they should be ridden by women. In bed. That's a man's place, in the middle of his wives.
>>17056062>i am a shared dildo>owned by a group of radical lesbians
>>17056060They import fertile BBC from North Africa.
>>17056074Yes, that's how you men will end up you realize? The desirable genetically will not be able to deprive humanity of their genes. If the survival of humanity depends on improving fitness, and your genes are good? You will be... utilized. If you're not desirable genetically you have nothing to fear, and honestly the majority of the guys in here are safe lol
Science & Math
Check out this lying dog.https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYIwm4NpaXo
