What went wrong?
>>17033014Do you usually advertise your retardation like this
>>17032009actually the old paleontology joke was "if you want to see a dinosaur just pluck a chicken"it turned you didn't even need the plucking
>>17032009bad investments
>>17032009It must have been the environment because dinosaurs wouldn't think about living in your radiator.
>>17032009That people even fell for this fucking creation myth joke in the first place.
Can they be trusted? I worried it's a waste of money and time, also most DNA/ancestry companies are owned by jews, I don't want the jews to have my genetic makeup in their databases.
>>17025844>Put DNA of a totally different species into a test designed for human DNA>Be surprised it comes out as nonsense>For my next test I use a human thermometer inside the core of the sun! Temperature debunked!See WebM
no, they cannot be trusted. there was a DNA testing company, and it was never mentioned which one, that admitted they fake the DNA test results of white people to "fuck with white supremacists" and they also have the rights to your genetic code forever, and they will give it to the cops if asked
>>17031752>>17032630Cope lol
>>17025844Real DNA tests are legit but there are plenty of profit motivated companies that sequence such a tiny amount they are basically guessing.My GF insisted on getting our mutt tested, he's clearly a great dane cross and 60kg of dog, test said he was a jake russle cross.
>>17026073They've had it for decades, your blood and genetics are being used currently to test new ways to make the gentile weak and sick. Who do you think gets all the blood after a hospital finishes its labs? Or when you piss in a cup for a drug test? It was all given to them on a "platter" at the moment of your birth in the hospital.
Is it me or do those newfangled LED street lights make it harder to see in the dark when compared to monochromatic sodium lamps?I can barely see anything in the shadows now, they seem almost black.
never thought I'd miss these yellow, faggots.
>>17034205No. Blue light is easier to see in the dark. Often they are just too bright, and the source is just too tiny which causes almost painful glare. They are usually also more directional, which results in more shadow. You may also be a lottle bit nearsighted, about one diopter is basically invisible in daylight, but it can greatly reduce your vision in the dark, easily by a factor of 16.
>>17034210Why not just ask for LEDs that emit sodium colored light?
If humans evolved intelligence, isn't it inevitable for other species to evolve intelligence too? And if they're inevitable, shouldn't we breed another intelligent species ourselves before evolution does on its own so that it doesn't misalign with human interests?how do we know some humans aren't already secretly breeding and selecting non-human beings for intelligence and creating their own natural intelligence bioweapons? Shouldn't governments regulare selective breeding to create intelligent beings for the danger they could pose to our democracies?
>>17033790Why uplift other species when we can eradicate a few and occupy their ecological niche through artificial human Speciation?It is perfectly feasible to become alien to ourselves (we already are - and should be) without involving dolphinoids and other potential successor species.
>>17034861>looking back technology was the best tool we had, not evolutionevolution can be a tool, though
>>17033790Unintelligent, so-called human life (i.e niggers) are an even bigger threat.I still believe that niggers are a legitimate answer to the Fermi Paradox.
>>17033790anything you think is intelligent is only happening inside your own mind.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ULHkNLveXZs&ra=m
>>17033790That's not how science works. You don't surround yourselves with someone different, or it creates a cause.
What is the evolutionary purpose of not having 1 big nostril instead of 2 small nostrils?
>>17030972stereoscopic sense of smell
>>17030972To keep it from becoming a sex orifices
>>17030972+directional for more accuracy+independent system for redundancy+dna pairing
>>17030972> What is the evolutionary purpose of not having 1 big nostril instead of 2 small nostrils?The people born with 1 nostril died before having sex
There were a joke about big holes and evolution.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21884363
Is this guy full of shit and a woo hack or is he legit? This only discussions I can find of him and his work are either on small obscure forums or reddit threads with 10 comments or less and the people commenting in them always inevitably end of bringing up "electrosmog" or other complete bullshit.
he has tons of videos talking about his ideas on his youtube. He's legit but it takes awhile to understand because his approach requires you to change how you think about biology and reality itself
>>17033454>Is this guy full of shit and a woo hack or is he legit?he's a jew so...
>>17033454he looks like that this man dream dude
>>17033454What ever happened to that old namefag bodhi who used to pretend to be this guy and post a bunch of nonsense from his esoteric blog where he thinks he solved everything?
>>17033454>"electrosmog" or other complete bullshit.Your problem is that you're retarded and don't actually know anything. Ignorant and arrogant. Too pathetic to respond further.
when did you realize that AI replacing mathematicians is going to mean marxist wordcel academics in the humanities will get to say >I told you so, being a wordcel marxist was the greatest form of intelligence all this timethis is despite the fact that programs have been capable of replacing marxist wordcel slop for a long time before even LLMs but because the total lack of standards in the humanities except ideological adherence and belonging to an approved identity group they can just reject any work they find convenient.gg
>>17032658Their "work" is 100000x easier to replicate for an AI than a unique theorem.There has literally been a generator for their slop since the 90s (https://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/)Besides, what tangible applications have they actually contributed to? Failed education reforms for black students?
>>17033928It’s not easier. Human beings are going to be super biased against AI because they see it as a threat to their social standing. The objectivity of STEM is both its greatest strength and, as it turns out, its greatest weakness, because human mathematicians cannot say that an AI’s proofs do not count because it lacks a soul or some bullshit. But in the humanities, it’s all subjective, so these Marxists are going to be so dishonest and gatekeep the fuck out of their fields.
Humanitists are insufferable, talentless hacks and, at scale, genuinely terrible people. I’d rather listen to a construction worker talk for hours than spend a few minutes engaging with them. t.write for a living
>>17034709Trvth
>>17032658>mathematicians can now solve problems that previously would have taken decades within days/weeks/months with AII bet they're all rejoicing as they can solve for porblems within math and move the field of mathematics further into the frontier
this is clearly CGI. now we've established NASA are lying to us and Space is fake AND gay, its time we dismantled the 3D hologram that surrounds the Earth.who's with me?
some of the images NASA release are just embarrassing. like a 10 year old who's gone crazy with photoshop.
>>17033774>>17033775>NASANeither pictures are from NASA. They are from amateur astronomers.
>>17033775I look like this
>>17033772Well yes, but actually no. Actually seeing it through an eyepiece is an incomparable experience. Actually physically seeing such extraordinary celestial objects and having the faintest notion of their grandeur... it's a religious experience. And to sensitive minds hyper-addictive. The addiction grows into a cosmic romance that deepens with time as the night sky becomes a familiar landscape and beautiful experiences grow on beautiful experiences. This is the passion of amateur and professional astronomers alike and it is glorious.This passion permeates the other sciences too, and any other subject. Want to learn about something? Seek out those who love it the most passionately, who give it the greatest devotion.People like OP don't give a shit about the night sky, the universe, or anything about astronomy whatsoever. They have zero investment and treat the entire subject with the greatest nihilistic regard. The only thing to say to them is: Fuck off, you don't actually care. Come back once you've used a telescope.
>>17033775>>17033824Looks like a cocaine pin, anon.
>Have a brain capable of storing vast amounts of data.>have incredible levels of pattern recognition.>decide to utilize it on moving pieces around on a silly board game to beat other like minded autists.make it make sense. what a waste of fucking time.
What I admire is how sane Magnus is while being geniuses. He's completely normal, socialized and perfectly emotionally stable.
>>17034452yeah this guy is an exception. previous champions are fucking autists in comparison(maybe correlated to your observation) he started chess way later than his peers
>>17033846Magnus also achieved pretty highly in the Norwegian Poker Championship. He can also recognise tons of specific historical chess games just by seeing the board positions. He's absolutely a genius, you have to be to be world-leading in something competitive like this. Like how Olympic swimmers need to have the specific natural physique of a long body but short legs. Sure, you can obviously swim without that, but to be on par with the best in the world where the gap between competitors is on the order of 0.1 seconds you can't cut it against the people who do have that advantage over you.
>>17033764You're right. They should play mahjong instead
>>17033764Nigga, do you really believe the elite of chess only plays the motherfucking game? How naive...The authorities are not dumb. They know how to use the best minds in their countries.https://youtube.com/shorts/1zY07ZjWaNg
I have found a way to divide anything in my head. So far, in fact, that i can get to the end of a calculator and can even prove, by showing my work, that the last digit in a division problem is either rounded up and down, depending on if it goes that far and doesnt go repeating and goes to the last number. AMA...except how to do it. I keep my secrets
Great! Now you can coach those memory champions.
Look up "UIL Math number sense practice tests"
>>17034848whats that exactly?
What are your favourite Springer SUMS books? I have a month before uni starts again and I want to learn something new but their catalogue is huge. Help me!Btw, NO combinatorics. I fucking hate that shit.
>>17033538Okay I'm learning to code now, glad I didn't need any math for this.
>>17033517>Btw, NO combinatorics. I fucking hate that shit.You hate it probably because you are bad at it. If you want to "Learn something new" you should learn the thing you avoid the most, don't be a pussy.
>>17033542>Okay I'm learning to code nowgood
>>17033538Learning to code is useless now, lil bro. Vibecoders won
>>17033517Well, from weather predictions to predator-prey dynamics, this book you might like:
Riccati EditionPrevious: >>16940654
>>17031608true
>>17031590>complains about ai slop>wants to contribute to ai slopAlso, the answer is whatever gives you more grant.
https://youtu.be/XkY2DOUCWMU?t=502Can someone explain to me his "proof"? You need to prove that AB(C) is the same as A(BC), but he just does his transformations in order C, B, A, instead of doing C, and then AB or BC and then A
>>17033550>but he just does his transformations in order C, B, A, instead of doing C, and then AB or BC and then AYes. That is the point.(AB)C is doing C, and then B and then A.A(BC) is doing C and then B, and then A.In either case you're doing exactly the same trio in exactly the same order. The only difference is which step you associate B with.
>>17033211this
Hey, scientists...Listen.https://youtube.com/shorts/nXTey1NIEWM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cyl3X88KEgg>make low tier rage bait>get millions of views and thousands of replies
>>17032866Is maneuvering not an option? Would we not have equipment sensitive enough to detect small fast objects like that and course correct very slightly far ahead of time? What about interception with high powered lasers? Kinetic solutions? Angled ERA? Spinning very long wires?Or just brute forcing with a hollowed out asteroid(s)?How thick would lead/water need to protect the crew from radiation?
Its a good thing too.Humanity in its current state is unfit to travel past the solar system. We would drag all our dregs along and they would destroy, pollute, and exhaust anything we found. Humans would be like locusts among the stars.Currently only a vanishingly small fraction of all Humanity is fit to exist as a space faring species. Only if that small fraction became the absolute sum total of all Humanity would it be ethical and feasible to travel among the stars.
millions of goyim will watch a half hour video telling them space big and crashing bad and basedjak over it
>>17032904I think it is the last known star to pass extremely close to our solar system was Scholz's Star, a dim binary system consisting of a red dwarf and a brown dwarf. It grazed the outer edge of the Oort Cloud about 70,000 years ago, coming within roughly 0.8 light-years (52,000 astronomical units) of the Sun. It would disturb some icy cometary bodies towards our sun.
>>17031974just encapsulate algae and shoot them everywhere to the nearest habitable planets
