/sqt/ - simple questions thread (aka /qtddtot/)Previous thread: >>16893204>what is /sqt/ for?Basic questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.>where do I go for advice?>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/>where do I go for other questions and requests?>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?rentry.org/sci-latex-v1>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?scholar.google.com>where can I search for proofs?proofwiki.org>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?warosu.org/scieientei.xyz/sci>how do I optimize an image losslessly?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16958170>(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)= (a + b – c)*(a + c – b)*(b + c – a) = (a + b + c – 2*c)*(a + b + c – 2*b)*(a + b + c – 2*a) = (2*s – 2*c)*(2*s – 2*b)*(2*s – 2*a) = 2*(s – c)*2*(s – b)*2*(s – a) = 2^3*(s – a)*(s – b)*(s – c)
>>16959149This post was invisible for more than one hour. That's why I accidentally posted it a second time. It only became visible after I posted it the second time.
>>16944314>13 days>25 postsJUST
>>16958918>wonder about the gasesNo harmful gases should come off, borates will not decompose from the heat and they wont react with anything in your mixture.Dont reuse the pot for making food borates are toxic to eat keep that pot for chemistry/junk
What are the odds of another dust bowl happening in our lifetime? Or is it unlikely to happen again due to better agriculture practices?
>>16956959>unlikely to happen again due to better agriculture practicesThat one.
>>16956959The dust bowl was mostly a one time event. Once the topsoil was lost there's no way to get it back within any human timescale. Soil regenerates incredibly slowly over millions of years thanks to prairie grasses slowly building it up. I.e. another dustbowl can't happen because it physically can't, regardless of land use.
>>16956959so thats what that map in tf2 is
>>16959481I didnt know this is a non-American but I wonder if American kids know what it means these days
Successful Static Fire Editionprevious >>16956328
https://x.com/JackKuhr/status/2045130235515904414
>>16959959ISO date format chad anon
>>16959964>chadhe's a redditor that seethed when i told him to stop double posting
>>16959968EDS tranny detected
>>16959770The new launch pad looks great.
Why I supposed to celebrate something we did in the 1960s? Why are we retreading the same ground? Space travel should be a mundane thing by now but no we need to prop up Apollo 8 2.0We should have just orbited Mars, not the fucking moon again
celebrate the space loo i guess
It was practice for the next moon landings which will be the start to building a moon base
>>16959225Oh so it was Apollo 10 2.0Cool
There is nothing in the fucking space. Where do you want to travel?
P:"The United States Semiquincentennial, also called the Bisesquicentennial, the Sestercentennial, or the Quarter Millennium, will be the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence. Festivities will mark various events leading up to the Declaration's anniversary on the 250th Independence Day: July 4, 2026."Q:"Artemis II (April 1–11, 2026) was a crewed lunar flyby mission. It was the first crewed flight of the NASA-led Artemis program and the first crewed flight beyond low Earth orbit since Apollo 17 in 1972."P probably caused Q.It's better to finally confess than to double down.
Scientists use EMF to activate a protein (Cyb5b) that can be used to turn on any gene.They used it to activate OSK making old mice live MUCH longer.
vindicated
>>16959383What can be done with this?
>>16959423I can turn on the genes that make you gay
>>16959423>enables in vivo rejuvenation>models Alzheimer’s disease and restores serotonergic function in vivo
>>16959425Off, Anon...he was shown a protein vagina and he shrugged in confusion...
Math is the only thing that is real.Reality is just one giant 3D slide show that for whatever reason exhibit consistent geometric patterns from one slide to the next. Identifying and describing said reproducible geometric patterns in mathematical equations is what science does, and the only thing that is real. All these other page upon pages of..words, aka "theories", are literal monkey talks. So long as the equation checks out you can grab any schizo theories off /x/ this very moment and it will stick.
>>16957801Just a prediction. You are welcome to ignore it.
>>16957647you'd make for a great politician
>>16956724Maybe in general relativity, which is fine to find yourselves in your 20s, but quantum physics goes further with people to be part of the equation.
>>16957813How do you predict things that already occurred?
>>16958335By making prediction about things that occurred light years away.
Time to get over it chuddies.. science isn't about finding truth. People built whole careers and lives around certain dogma.The scientific inquiry, accepting of all ideals, open to debate, anti politics is just a marketing gimmick you chuds fall for and whine about when your contrarian views are laughed at, mocked and ridiculed. Too bad you don't have the social skills to understand human nature and consensus and cooperation. Your isolation makes you undesirable. Sorry about your luck
>>16959170More bimbos in science should do the trick
>>16959170>Science is a lie that unscrupulous people use to advance their career at the expense of truthYeah, that's what us Chud's have been saying. The only point we still disagree on is, "and that's a good thing". Söyentists hate Chud's because we see through your fraud and you are worried that we will tip off the NPCs.
>>16959272Idk man certain consensus is useful. Schizo pushback just breeds more conflict and less cooperation. How can science progress if no one can agree?Schizophrenics are just mad no one agree with their “scientific ideas” could it be possible that schizos are wrong and their own delusions won’t let them fairly concede?
>>16959363>Schizophrenics are just mad no one agree with their “scientific ideas” could it be possible that schizos are wrong and their own delusions won’t let them fairly concede?Im not sure who youre talking about. The schizos pushing covid or the ones calling it a conspiracy?
>>16959363>How can science progress if no one can agree?>Schizophrenics are just mad no one agree with their “scientific ideas”"We all need to get along and come together. It will be a brotherhood of mankind. A new world governed by peace and love... except for you Chud, you can fuck off." Its the story of my life.
>be nasa>have infinite budge>prepare for one of the most important launches of history>take 10 year old DSLR camera with youbut "it's a proven and tested camera".. sure..with all that budget they could've pay nikon to build a custom camera with a much bigger sensor and use the D5 as a back up. Oh and not to mention the lens they've used (venerable 14-24 f/2.8G.) was made in 2007.
>>16952073>they could've pay nikon to build a custom camera with a much bigger sensorthey brought 24MP z5s and a 48MP z9... how much more resolution do you need when their closest approach was going to be 4000 miles above the surface?
>>16957735They should have brought a telescope and located the landing site
>>16952073fuck off idiot.
My ten year old DSLR still looks better than my cellphone even though cellphone has multiple sensors and 4k HDR video. Its all about the optics more than the sensor. Theres got to be some diminishing returns with those sensors. Just go to flickr and look at large 00s photos. They absolutely look clearer than whats from todays phones. I believe 48 megapixel existed twenty years ago? Sony….Sony injects AI processing into the hardware level, so there is no way to know if you are getting a real image. So youd want stuff that is pre-AI
>>16952885Lol yeah shittons normies don't understand anything and just use popular marketing buzzwords. It's how YouTube and streaming services can get away with lowering bitrates because they don't know anything about bitrates, only numbers going up in resolutions. 1080p is 2.1 megapixels. I see zoomers all the time being baffled that a consumer digital camera in 2002 would have okay image quality because camera phones is all they know.
just found out oil isn't really made out of dinosaurs. Why did they lie to us?
>>16958882>everything is simultaneously true and untrue at the same time,Therefore your statement is untrue.
Nothing is true; everything is permitted. The election is in a cloud and not physical.
tets
>>16958834The scientists keep lying about dinosaurs to make us look like fools. I'm starting to think they aren't even real now.
>>16958834I got this insight by simply>massive quantities lasting several decades of nothing but non plant organic matter all clumped up?>I don't believe itand I was right
Since S is also -1/12, does this mean that -1/12 = -1/8?
>>16959012No, Ramanujan summation doesn’t have the stability property
>>16959068How do you explain picrel then?
>>16959012you can’t re order the summations without changing the partial sum
>>16959012*sigh*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beakj767uG4
https://philogb.github.io/page/myriahedral/
Build a huge vise and flatten the Earth.
>>16957082I've been working on this problem for 20 years (I am autistic but also dumb)I switch between accepting that there is no perfect answer most of the time, and chasing wild geese down rabbit holes when I get what I imagine is very close to a manic episodeI've settled on icosahedrons. but I'm not happy about it
>>16958931While this doesn't solve your problem, you might be interested in reading up on Uber's H3 representation of the Earth.
>>16957082What's the problem? Use a globe if you need to "understand."Aviation and Naval charts already meet the needs for long distance travel. There's no unsolved problem, the professionals have adequate solutions.
>>16958931the best projection is one that moves. Now you know, spend another 20 years on it kthnx
Monty Hall doesn't make any sense and we've all been coerced to go along with it>uh but actually it's demonstrable that your odds increase from 1/3 to 2/3 if you swap doorsNo!You're exchanging one chance for another, it's 50/50 regardless. The system is broken and everyone's too afraid to point it out because the consequences are dire
I started this thread as a joke and now we're gonna hit bump limit...
>>16958497Bone of you guys were able to explain it in a way which made sense to me.Zooming out to the marble game made it click.And it only suggested 3 marbles, I'm the one who scaled it out, the deduced I held a marble with 1:100 probability of being right.The LLM was much gmfaster to respond, and much more personal.Not that I didn't trust you guys,but I needed to actually understand it for myself, and it just wasn't clicking here/I stopped reading at a point to rope thr LLM into it.Funny enough, Google put a disclaimer on that chat to be careful about what the LLM says and to grab a parent topkekBut yeah, wow, it makes sense.I makes perfect sense with the marble game. It still feels uncomfortable with the goat game; I don't don't like it.I wonder if it's because 33% and 50% aren't far enough apart? But they are - That's a huge difference.I need to reconcile with myself why the goat example feels uncomfortable but the marble example I'd bet my life on.
>>16958657Of course I could have scaled it with doors, too. The marbles are arbitrary.Was a neat thought exercise.>>16958633checkedThe next thread is going to be about flipping a coin, how the past does NOT determine the probability of the future, that each flip is independent of the last, isn't it?Ship it.
>>16958633It's not there yet
just butcher and behead anyone that posts this garbage thread at this point
Will man ever land on Uranus?
>>16958840fun fact
>>16958840let's just focus on using probes
Johann Bode was a homo for naming it after Ouranos.
>>16958840I was roofied and probably anally raped 13 years ago
>>16959228They could only withstand Uranus from a distance with flybys.
to compare two animals as a wholelets say 1) human2) ratyou cant put genomes of both onto a computer and make a comparison from first genetic markers to the last and everything in between, to check if human and rat are 50% the same, or 80% or whateverits not possible because human genome is like 4 gigabytes and rat is similar sizethese are too big for computer software!of course it might be fault of programmers, who knowswhat is possible to do, is to compare mitocholdria of a human and a rat and those would reveal to be 99% identical to no surpriseboth human and rat evolved from primitive rodents 80 million years ago, altough a human had several ape stages in between:1) flying monkey (lives on trees)2) macaque (lives on ground)3) something that resembles chimpanzee a lot more, has lost its tail4) finally human at some pointComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Markers are unique to the minds of the species for quantum extrapolation from memory neurotransmitters.
>>16958768>both human and rat evolved from primitive rodents 80 million years ago,You're stupid.
>>16958768That's crap. Spoof the replace function for a file and just do an audit of what files are replaced, but have each file be a specifically coded label, and you can reference the two feasibly. If the genomes have been mapped already, you can feasibly find the difference. Outliers would be "junk dna" that may be more ambiguous in its expression, being dormant.
We are suffering lockdowns over on Reddit because Science hasn’t yet delivered Faith Scrolls on this topic.When will Science speak? Why are all the nonbinary folx (scientific designation) white femalx?Anxiously awaiting Faith Scrolls scientifically..yours
>>16951578Hello retarded faggot of least intellect. All of those yid terms describe sex characteristics, not genders.
>>16950303"The world without religion will be a Star Trek paradise of rationality"The world actually without religion:
>>16956647Are hate facts like hate crimes? It's a crime + hate? It's a fact + hate? The funny thing is, crime or fact, both happened. You just don't like that you're not well-liked.
>>16950357Then science can't give you an answer. I'm skeptical of social sciences in general too. Social phenomena have too many cultural, demographic, economic, etc factors to easily be isolated or replicated, so even if you do have high-quality data the best you can usually do is a post hoc explanation that's colored by your biases. The fact that there is an "answer" doesn't mean it's knowable
>>16950375Until the West finally recovers from all the scams and abuse the Church committed, God will always be a dirty subject in the wider public sphere.Until then, it's a steep race to the bottom because without God as a point of reference for truth, everything becomes fluid.
