Higher Dimensions Solve Dark Matter? Modified Einstein Equation Explains Flat Galaxy Rotation Curves Without Invisible Mass Equation & Deets Inside
>>16838115>>16838358Main difference being that there aren't any scientific inquisitors imprisoning and torturing people for not suggesting any alternative theories to dark matter/energy.
>>16839408stop living in the past, chud.
>>16837882Higher dimensions solve everything. You can always assume another dimension in any model. I like to add a "rainbow-unicorn" dimension to all my worlds. Something for the fans, you know.
>>16837882>Omg this huge ass pile of whatever the fuck clearly exists because it's effecting everything, and at the same time other areas of science suggest there may be higher dimensions! Could these things possibly go together?Duh, anon
so dark matter is everywhere except in our own solar system which appears to have no influence of dark matter at all? doubt
you were saying?
>>16843644it was me asking for the record, I just don't want the thread derailed, but perhaps it is true that I need to lrn2 4chins engaging post
>>16840325seeing OP's pic got me wondering, what's the minimal or in it's defect, foldable length of wings one would need to:>provide the vehicle with gliding capabilities>enhance flight (forward) modeI say this because the vehicles can benefit from gliding capabilities in an emergency landing context, can (probably) benefit from wings in forward flight mode, BUT, need to be compact in the landing a few vehicles in the same relatively reduced space which could be a building rooftop
hmmmhh... 3d traffic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Fev5M_7Wnwlooked into this one "volonaut", the fuckero didn't show any insides of the engine, he censored them on IG even when the prototype was being built, so it's hard to tell what's doing really, I don't think it uses conventional rotors, but maybe those air-jets or some kind of jets, seems to have an intake on the top partnext I'll post the first ever flying bike that I ever saw
this one is really oldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9UkjwcdIA0no updates on it to follow up in years, shame how these things don't get funding
it do be like that
>>16840284ok arbitrary and capricious, amounts to the same thing
>>16839899print moneygive it to your friendsyour friends buy assetsdemand for assets risesprice of assets risemoney buys less assets: inflation has occurred.I've explained concisely what economists employed by the state claim to find unfathomable force of nature.
>>16840284You wouldn't pay income tax on it because it is offset by the costs of business - the loss of 1 dollar for each dollar gained.
>>16843895If there was no added value, then the GDP of exchanging the same dollars millions of times would be zero, no GDP.If there was added value, you would have to pay income tax on that. You cant have it both ways, claiming GDP was created but also that you dont have to pay a tax on it because the added value was zero.
>>16840936>"no no you dont understand, printing money causes number to go up which means it is good and creates wealth"
Are there true contradictions?
>>16840849Yes, it is true that zero is its own opposite number, its own additive annihilator, a valueless value that contradicts itself which is why it the origin number of the deductive explosion known as numerical arithmetic.
>>16840849We consider first order logic formulas build on a language (a collection of constants, function and relation symbols) and the logical connectors -> and forall only. In the following let be O any fixed formula without free variables (it could be a constant). We define a "proof" to be any sequence (A_1,...,A_n) where for every i in {1,...,n} either:(1) A_i has one of the following forms: A -> (B -> A), (A -> (B -> C) -> ((A -> B) -> (A -> C)) or (forall x A) -> (A[x:= t])(2) there are integers j,k such that j < i, k < i and A_j = A_k -> A_i(3) there is an integer j such that j < i and formulas B,C and a letter y not having any free occurrence in B such that A_j = B -> C and A_i = B -> (forall y C)Note for further concerns that this system doesn't have any "non contradiction principle"; in fact it doesn't even expresses negations (it is a fragment of intuitionistic logic with only implications). But notice as well that if we had a constant "false" in the language and had the exra axioms "((A -> false) -> false) ->A" we could express and prove with the rules above, all classical first order logic theorems.We say a formula F is regular (remember we have fixed a formula O without free variables) if there is a proof of (((F -> O) -> O) -> F). It is routine to check that O is itself regular and that the set of regular formulas is stable by implication (in fact for every formula S and every regular formula R, (S -> R) is regular) and forall. Also, for every regular formula A, there is a proof of (O -> A) in the above sense. So we define, for any first order formula P (with the added constant false this time), the translation P* (which will always be regular) by induction:-if P is atomic, P* is P->O;-if P = A -> B, P*:= (A*) -> (B*);-if P:= forall x A, P*:= forall x (A*). This translation interprets all classical reasoning in our base system. So the non contradiction is obtained and paraconsistent logic is this a meme.
>>16840849>>are there any true contradictions?Yes, Paradoxes
>>16842688What is the specific logical expansion for the impossibility of contradiction?
The paradox of tolerance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg [Embed]Indian podcaster Dwarkesh Patel debates the 'father of reinforcement learning' Prof. Richard Sutton on whether LLMs are a dead-end.Sutton believes so, while Dwarkesh Patel proclaims LLMs are the foundation on which experiential learning can happen, citing recent LLM models' success at high-school math problems. Patel claims humans all learn by imitation too.The following exchange summarizes the debate:>Patel: But there are phases of learning where there's the programming in your biology early on, you're not that useful. And then kind of why you exist is to understand the world and learn how to interact with it. It seems like a training phase [in LLMs].>Sutton: There's NOTHING where you have training of what you should do; there's nothing. You see things that happen, you're not told what to do. Don't be difficult, I mean, this is obvious.>Patel: I-I mean you're literally taught what to do, this is where the word training comes from, from humans.>Sutton: I don't think learning is really about training, I think learning is about learning, an active process. The child tries things and sees what happens. We don't think about training when we think of an infant growing upWhat's /sci/'s verdict? Who won?Is Dwarkesh Patel right in saying humans are literally taught what to do the moment they're born? Is all learning just imitation?
>>16834828The guy on the right is just an interviewer that hosts talks with experts in their fields. Look up his videos with Sarah Paine. He just looks into whatever field the expert is in and prepares some questions into their work.
e=mc2+ai
>>16841029so? If you interview someone from a technical field, you better know some technical stuff. Look up Misha Gromov's interview: Korolyov actually had a background in math and could ask interesting questions. Meanwhile Dwarkesh Patel apparently has a degree in CS but doesn't understand the fundamentals of reinforcement learning
>Patel claims humans all learn by imitation too.this is incredibly fascinating because it shows exactly why poopjeets love AI so much. they literally can only imitate others, so from their perspective AI is already basically sentient
>>16841114The Poojeet creativity
Wait, so now the universe's expansion isn't accelerating at all? We've just been fed total bullshit for all these years? Give me one good reason why we should take anything physicists say seriously anymore.
>>16843286Physicists literally just rewrite the "laws" every time some engineer comes along and builds something that proves them wrong, hence the need for quantum physics.
>>16843214Cosmologists anon. Astronomy is a distinct PhD from physics. Blaming this on physicists is like COVID experimenters proponents of evolution.
>>16843214Cosmologists should be awarded the Nobel prize in literature at this point, not physics
>>16843349How could they be understandings if they were wrong?
>>16843605>>16843612/thread
For me, it's [math]\widehat{\infty}[/math]. It denotes the formal neighborhood (formal disc) of the point [math]\infty\in\mathbb{P}^1[/math].More conretely: if [math]X[/math] is a smooth curve over some field [math]k[/math], write [math]\hat{\bar{\mathcal{O} } }_{X,x}[/math] for the completed local ring at [math]x\in X[/math], let [math] \mathbb{D}_{X,x} := \mathrm{Spf}(\hat{\bar{\mathcal{O} } }_{X,x})[/math] be the formal disc at [math]x[/math], and let [math] \mathbb{D}_{X,x}^\times := \mathrm{Spec}(\textrm{Frac}(\hat{\bar{\mathcal{O} } }_{X,x}))[/math] be the punctured formal disc. Then [math]\widehat{\infty} := \mathbb{D}_{\mathbb{P}^1,\infty}^\times[/math].This is quite the interesting object in algebraic geometry. For [math]X=\mathbb{P}^1[/math] with affine ccordinates [math]t[/math] on [math]\mathbb{A}^1 = \mathbb{P}^1\setminus \{\infty\}[/math], put [math]s=1/t[/math] as a uniformizer at infinity. We then get:[eqn] \hat{\bar{\mathcal{O} } }_{\mathbb{P}^1,\infty}\cong k[\! [x]\!] = k[\![t^{-1}]\!][/eqn][eqn] K_\infty := \textrm{Frac}( \hat{\bar{\mathcal{O} } }_{\mathbb{P}^1,\infty})\cong k(\!(s)\!)=k(\!(t^{-1})\!).[/eqn]Thus:[eqn]\widehat{\infty} = \mathrm{Spf}\, k[\![s]\!][/eqn][eqn]\widehat{\infty}^\times = \mathrm{Spec}\, k(\!(s)\!).[/eqn]It basically marks a local "port" where you impose a level structure and couple global geometry on [math]\mathbb{P}^1[/math] to local loop-group/Kac-Moody representation theory at the place infinity.So when algebraic geometers write, say, [math]\mathrm{Bun}_G(\mathbb{P}^1,\hat{0},\widehat{\infty})[/math], they mean G-bundles on P^1 together with chosen trivializations over the formal discs at 0 and infinity.
>>16838292How do I become smart like you mathfags?
>>16841210You said it in the grown up way.
>>16841265Read all of this https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/browse
>>16841400Thanks
>>16841400It may be a bit much but it's genuinely an excellent resource for algebraic geometry and it's preliminaries. I'd recommend it's chapter on commutative algebra over any book unironically
Exact sequence edition.ITT: Discussion of mathPrevious thread: >>16803023
>>16838280Whew...I'll need some sauce for that spaghetti?
>>16841222checkem> also tfw you somehow got too relaxed
>>16841952or vibe proving?
>>16841492teal = dark cyanpurple = dark magentaolive = dark yellow
>>16843555https://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/gaitsgde/GL/Arkh.pdf
If you think it's X, think again.
https://youtu.be/U7NHNT3M-tw
Why is everybody in math so autistic?
If atheism is true, then why did the universe start in a low entropy state?
>>16843237If goldfish aren't gold, then why is the sky blue?See, two can play that game.
>>16843237Because that is how counting works, you start a the lowest state and work your way up, and measurement is an extension of counting.
>>16843237Why is the start low entropy when it was a massive random cloud of gas for millions of years but now it's neatly organised into galactic filaments, galaxies, solar systems, stars, planets, etc. Seems like today is less entropy to me. Stupid science
>>16843237It didn't. What changed was inflation which smoothed all wrinkles.
>>16843237>infinitely hotShow me the variance. You can't.
Time travel is impossible. The past and future do not exist. Only now exists.
>>16842806I see it like a process of crystallization or stabilization of a larger substrate where the future is still in superposition until we "look at it." The Great Collapse. OooOOoooo
>>16843430That is teleportation not time travel. I never said time dilation is time travel it only creates the effect of time travel for the person experiencing it. It is the closest real world plausible form of time travel we have. Teleportation does not involve time displacement.
>>16842987I know what you mean, but say if you were able to freeze time across the universe everywhere at once then that would be considered "now" for everyone at that instant.
>>16842806"now" doesn't even exist either according to general relativity (even for separate observers that are yet not moving at all with respect to each other, but who are in different gravitational fields).
>>16842987Time is the same everywhere. You just perceive motion in fewer or greater increments.
Race and subspecies are one and the same.>inb4 racist
>>16842388Who said I disagreed with your claims??? I didn't.I was just saying I'm sick of seeing Pepe haha lol.
>>16842414>PrevaricationCowardly and meek
>>16841108Correct.
Race is a cultural concept of how that culture understand something like white or black or asian or brown.There's not a single unified definition of white or black over centuries, except phenotypically traits.But such phenotypical traits can appear in populations that aren't considered of a certain race.Like how iranians are considered a brown race, yet they can have blonde people with blue or green eyes and pink nipples, yet they are never considered whites.Or you can have blonde blacks in solomon islands, even thought they're scientifically classified genetically as dravidians.Slavs by example can be blonde with blue eyes, but they also have asian traits like having straight asian hair.So race is a cultural definition, not a genetic definition like subspecies.
>>16841054>Race and subspecies are one and the same.Interested in your ancestry, are we Frog?You plopped out of your mom's cloaca and your dad splooged you with his cloaca splooge.Your genetic heritage is that of the cloaca.You're welcome.
If mean chuds, if the emergent loop being activated by the fixed pity wins of the inner gameplay loops, this basically could be clasifiied as a singular musical loop bar.So basically we can design the flow of the game using these musical gameplay bars, instead of the traditional winning and losing condition.So, let's say your game last 32 of these musical bars.Then your game doesn't have a fixed lenght, like using a timer.But neither it needs a victory or losing game over condition.It only needs to reach eventually to the musical bar 32 or 16 for the composition to end.So this mean, a very skilled speedrunner could theorically end the game much much faster than a casual player.But this means the game is guaranteed to end because of the guaranteed pity wins.
>>16843779You game sucks. I stopped playing.
Why can't we just clone this thing?
>>16833578Why don't YOU do it then? It's right there. You can just go in there and do it.
The phenomenon of "extinct species" is a hoax.
>>16840801>But I doHow is it done, why don't abyone does it, why do they conform to mere gene editing to get "similar results", and lastly, is someone actually doing the thing in secret in government secret labs?
>>16842600I like it
>>16833578I wonder if they were delicious.I unironically feel kinda bad for the species we extinguished because of ignorance, I'm sure most pre-historic humans weren't actively interested in killing entire species, most likely we just didn't know better.
