Invent a possible S-risk scenario that may happen in the future just to try to avoid it.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqnJcZiDMDo
>>16555240There's no reason to assume that future suffering on a universal scale has causes different from present day global and local suffering. Therefore: time, money and effort spend on analyzing S-risks should be spend on addressing current causes of suffering.
>>16555292there is always something that you don't know
What is the motivation for Large Cardinals in Set Theory?
>>16555305Large Cardinals are dominated by new york jews, not japanese.
>>16555308why exclusively NYC jews kek?
>>16555308It is both.
>>16555309Mistake. Not new york jews, I meant to say california jews.They're literally called the cabalhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal_(set_theory)
>>16555316>a set of set theoristswhoever wrote this must have had a blast
Can anyone explain BEAF in Googology? How does it work? Or can you recommend a site or smth, where i can learn stuff like that?
>>16550420Site for Googology is googology.fandom.com
Is testosterone the bane of male existence?
>>16554922Test is awesome. I pity the holes who can't experience it.
according to studies on bullying both bullies and the bullied were low testosterone.the high testosterone didn't care
>>16555190True and real.In high school chads are too busy fucking little bitches in the asshole.
>>16555190When monkeys are injected with testosterone, they end up bullying weaker monkeys (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3367374/)
>>16555248based
>if a positron and an electron touch, they annihilate each other>particles are not 0 dimensional points, they exist as a way function that permeates a big chunk of space. therefore, two particles can't touch each other because they are extended objects and we don't know where they are>an electron and a positron can not annihilate for a while and form a bound state together called positronium where they orbit each other, even though they are as close as they can be according to quantum mechanics>when two particles are too far away, their langrangian is the free particle lagrangian, and the interaction term magically appears when they are close to each otherI don't understand QFT
>>16555220>ThuslySAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
>>16555222mutt education
>>16555158Matter travels forwards in time.Antimatter travels backwards in time.Photons experience no passage time.From the perspective of the electron, a particle-antiparticle pair approach and fuse, matter is converted into energy, fissioning into two photons.From the perspective of the positron, two photons approach and fuse, energy is condensed into matter, fissioning into a particle-antiparticle pair.
>>16555158Just do the feynman diagrams retard. Oh waitk they have been done already like 70 years ago, just read an intro QFT book and follow along retard.
>>16555227You say “whence” too, ESL larper?
Hello everyone, I am new here.I came to this channel looking for some help. I've been barely passing maths for three years, or sometimes I can't. I've been doing well in maths for three years now. It's a subject that I really like, but I'm bad at it. Last year I had to choose a course of study I didn't want because I was afraid of maths, as you read, afraid.If anyone reading this has any videos, tips, tricks for learning maths, anything, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much everyone reading this, have a nice day.Translated with DeepL https://www.deepl.com/app/?utm_source=android&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=share-translation
>>16555156Tip #1: be autistic
>>16555179Delusional. Autistic people have lower IQs and have a much harder time with mathematics.
>>16555184IQ doesn’t correlate with autism. Both high and low IQ people can be autistic.
>>16555184IQ tests are often less accurate for autistics, and plus even adjusted for intelligence, generally autistics are better at math than neurotypicals.Also, my area of math (Logic) is 60% autistic.
Zoomer (born in 2000) here. Is it true that Pluto used to be considered an actual planet in the solar system?
>>16554722>You were taught a definition that was based on an arbitrary set of criteriaNo shit. And the new definition is arbitrary. Since it's all arbitrary, I'll go with what I was taught my whole life and what I have nostalgia for. Let's not pretend there's any science or rigor at play here. My fee fees are just as valid as any arbititrary criteria some panel of astronomer bureaucrats come up with.
>>16554510>muh planetIt's Reddit garbage anyway.This nigga got it right: >>16554518
In third grade, I made a model of the solar system and that included Pluto as a planet. Our science teacher, Ms. Rodriguez, said my model was the best and the entire class had to applaud when I presented it. Literally everyone clapped but not a meme. It was the best day of my life and no eggheads are going to take away my lived experience. Pluto is a planet and always will be.
>>16555022Nah I like their definition more than yours
>>16554510yes with alongside your mom before she too got reclassified
ITT thread we only discuss cellular senescence and not any other hallmark of aging, some major research needs are...>a quantitative atlas of when and where senescent cells appear during normal aging;>a quantitative atlas of when and where senescent cells are present during the development of the spectrum of age-related pathologies;>a more intensive search for compounds that can either selectively kill senescent cells orselectively modulate the SASP, the feasibility of which was recently demonstrated;>more comprehensive knowledge about why senescent cells increase during aging and inage-related disease, despite the ability of the immune system to eliminate them; and>more comprehensive knowledge about when and where senescent cells are beneficial andparticipate in tissue repair and regeneration.
>>16550337Is fisetin okay to take daily in that case?
Why do mice get to benefit from drugs and humans don't? Are they superior to us?
>>16552921It’s a different drug. Rapamycin has more research. What are you taking this class of drug for?
>>16546299What ... the mouse model is ALWAYS right! :D
>>16548080it's like every animal has a fixed number of heartbeats
I was curious about the probability of the following:Chapter 3, verse 190: "There are signs for men of knowledge in the shifting of day and night." Chapter 24, verse 44: "Signs for men of vision, in the shifting of day and night." Chapter 41, verse 53: "Soon will the signs be shown to them in the horizons and within themselves."This led me to deduce the most unambiguous way to express rotation: should it be tau (wrapping the radius on top of the sphere 6.28 times), or halfway, at 3.14 pi?I looked at verse formations: • Chapter 3, verse 14: Relates to accumulating wealth and returning home. • Chapter 6, verse 28: Relates to returning back, with the letters "rah, dhal, waw." • Chapter 62, verse 8: Relates to returning back to God, pronounced as "rah, dhal, nun," or "raduiun," similar to radians (3.14 radians, 6.28 radians, etc.).Then, I examined degree translation: • 1 radian = 180 deg / pi radians ≈ 57.3 degrees / radians • Chapter 57, verse 3: "He is the First, the Last, the Inner, and the Outward (literally the top-most)."Consider the borders of a radius: the innermost and the topmost points. Within this context, think about iron being at the Earth's core, with an atomic number of 26 (protons). The numerical value of the Arabic letters for “The Iron” is 57, while for “iron” itself, it’s 26.The maximal formation of chapter and verse number occurs at Chapter 114, Verse 6, which reflects the double radius in angle, just like Chapter 57, Verse 3. This concept of edges is repeated in a crucial place across the 6236 verses of the Quran, using the average value of tau (6.28): specifically, in Chapter 62, Verse 8 and Chapter 6, Verse 28.When dividing [eqn]\frac{6236}{6.283} = 992.5[eqn] part 1
>>16555103This is what happens when your field has zero women
all jewish ''wisdom'' is in parable, because jews dont have any wisdom so they try to hide it with ''parables'' which they say oddly-enough they always require a jew to interpret
>>16555224You dont have aby wisdom either incel
This state of this board is fucking abysmal
absolutely fucking abysmal
>Dutch scientists, who analysed data from 70.000 Brits, found those ate more unhealthy plant-based diet had a higher chance of suffering from frail. but this was even higher for some menNow that its know that vegans are unhealthy, can science explain why are vegans so unhealthy? Should vegans be forced to eat meat in order to have a healthier overall population? We already vaccinate people in order to make the population healthier so enforcing a healthy diet seems like a logical net step.
>>16549074All agriculture is good for the environment. The whole purpose of agriculture is to take a piece of land and make it more environmentally produce than it otherwise would be
>>16529891>science finds out something that everyone else already knew to be the truth thousands of years agogenius
>>16549074I think the more cautious thing to say is that ranching can be good for the environment.But everything depends on the implementation.Of course the nuance likely is lost on you.
>>16553158Agriculture is bad for the environment when large sections of forests are razed just so soibean crops can be planted en masse
>>16555199so monoculture = bad?
After 100 years of autistic screeching and kvetching, can we finally admit he was right?
>>16555036He wasn't.This interpretation is a religious mumbo-jumbo.
Jews are never right.
>>16555036Bohmian Mechanics is the only real interpretation so no.
>>16555038>>16555117>>16555127>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST BASE A SCIENTIFIC THEORY ON WHAT YOU CAN OBSERVE SCIENTIFICALLY
Most of you can barely do calculus. What are you even doing here?
I'm dumb and uneducated but i've decided that if i'm gonna waste my time on 4chan, might as well learn some useful or interesting things while i'm at it.
>>16548424Are low IQs really that much of a problem?
>>16550940If you're really "dumb" as you say, you won't learn anything from here anyways. Why would lower quality discussion about topics you likely lack the educational background to even engage with have any educational value?Or do you just want to feel "smart" and read big words and be fascinated by terminology all day while in reality you're exerting zero mental effort and have no understanding of what you're looking at?
>>16554294Every 4chan board is composed of something like 99,99% of garbage and 0,01% of genuine gold the likes of which you just won't find anywhere else on the internet (information on obscure topics, genuinely intelligent and thought-provoking advice, etc.). The difference with /sci/ is that the quality of the "garbage" here is miles ahead of the true mindrot boards such as /v/, /pol/, etc. Even the low-quality discussion here is most of the times genuinely interesting instead of just being piles and piles of bait, propaganda and nonsense spouted by the dumbest retards you'll ever find. If i go on an hours long session of lurking on /sci/ i don't feel like my brain has been poisoned in the way it would be if i had spent that time on a fast board.I also have to admit that i lied about being dumb, although i am indeed uneducated. Although lacking the educational background for certain topics is not a big problem as i have an autistic obsession with googling everything i don't immediately understand.
>>16546226is being good at calc 1 and 2 any indication that i may be good if i were to study pure math? i fucked up by choosing electrical engineering but now im 2 years in and realised i actually like the math way more than anything irl but i feel like its too late.
The guy who ran EcoHealth Alliance, the guy who was doing covid research in the Wuhan Lab, the guy who lied and claim the virus came from Wuhan meat market and not the Wuhan lab that he worked for and was researching the virus with.
>>16554836>still no executionstill no justice
>>16554836Next up, the shitheads at ICL who scared the world governments into a panic when their models showed that "if we do everything right, we can limit deaths to 10% of the population".
How long these two dorks will be able to convince everybody AGI can emerge from a Turing machine given enough computational speed?
Is chatGPT even *close* to being a fucking AGI? No! Are you kidding? Sure, it more or less passes the turing test. That was the previous benchmark for an "AI", but that is nowhere close to being an AGI. chatGPT is dependent on thousands of people and is carefully managed, not the other way around.
>>16554946Here is another thing. Has chatGPT contributed an iota of useful knowledge to the human race? No. It's seen millions of discussions on calculus so it can mimic answering a calculus problem, but ask it how many R's are in the word strawberry, which it has seen billions of times, and it might get it wrong. There is your AGI.
>>16554870citation? apart from corporate ever changing definition so they can continually sell AGI to you without it being AGI, it's supposed to be something similar to a human but clearly not human. the word artificial implies it's a different substrate/hardware but same functions. that can only be an analogue of human brain based on theory of operation and all the extra functions/parts of the brain. if the human brain is not Turing complete then AGI won't be. >>16554918>Speaking of religionthis isn't religion>someone saidan he kinda got fucked on that statement isn't it?>Albert Einstein's religious views have been widely studied and often misunderstood.[1] Albert Einstein stated "I believe in Spinoza's God".[2] He did not believe in a personal God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings, a view which he described as naïve.[3] He clarified, however, that, "I am not an atheist",[4] preferring to call himself an agnostic,[5] or a "religious nonbeliever."[3] In other interviews, he stated that he thought that there is a "lawgiver" who sets the laws of the universe.[6] Einstein also stated he did not believe in life after death, adding "one life is enough for me."[7] He was closely involved in his lifetime with several humanist groups.[8][9] Einstein rejected a conflict between science and religion, and held that cosmic religion was necessary for science.
We could easily have simple AGI by now if retards didn't focus on LLMs.
>>16548049>after about three years it should be obvious this """AI""" shit has peakedIt's obvious now. GPT is at iphone 11 level progress. It's clear that we've squeezed all the juice out of transformers we're going to get, and all that's left is diminishing returns on exponentially increasing resources. We're in for another AI winter until the next groundbreaking architecture comes out. It's going to be a long winter because investors will be skeptical of AI for at least a decade after the bottom falls out of this bubble.
https://wondrousnet.blogspot.com/2024/06/solution-to-puzzle-informatix.html
