...before CERN's Large Hadron Collider screwed everything up and put us in this version of reality, existence, and events we're in now?Because I was born in 2006 and am still a virgin to this day so I wouldn't know either way.
Take your meds.
>>17007752Fuck you. Answer the god damn question.
You're a retarded schizophrenic. You have been on this earth for almost two decades and are blaming particle accelerators for your inability to have intercourse. Go outside, get hobbies, engage in normal human behavior.
>>17007448I would say happy to find someone who likes me as well, compared to some really competitive group activity>Hypothesis: cern's lab rat gfs would be my baguette girl if it was not for cern>Experiment: cancel cern by fearmongering particle collider doomsday device story
She's back!
>>17003248Some mind that were waylaid some whiles as result from that long covid plague and scourge disease that were most dread
>>17005836Take your meds schizo
No she isn't.
>>17003286are you Roger Egbert?
>>17003248Shes beck!
New transportation method I invented. (The image is pretty self-explanatory.)
go tell them over at >>>/n/
>>17007985there's over 150 years of prior art and darpa already patented it in 2006
Genomic data and HARs prove adhd and autism were selected for in the Palaeolithic and are directly connected to the development of the neocortex while psychopathy and sociopathy were selected for during the Neolithic when agricultural land allowed for inheritance and favoured long term strategy over cooperation. The literature is explicit. The autistic/adhd brain modulated by HARs is further away from the chimp brain. This is exclusively polymorphic inherited autism which used to be called 'high functioning' it excludes high level non functioning autists which experienced a spontaneous collapse from negative HAR mutation and most often have no history of family autism.
>>16995105Yeah, OP is just passing off his inane beliefs as basic evolutionary pyschology
>>16995379>do better in gig economysource?this feels like a product of them leaving often due to going insaneconstant change and unpredictability are things autist hate
>>16996630Middle one if any at all.
>>16994535Autism just means someone who doesn’t emulate african American culture. Every single East Asian person would be labeled “autistic” under the microscope of these psychoanalyst pseudo intellectual wordcels. Psychopathy just means a fucking asshole who never accepts responsibility like a fucking rat + higher than avg verbal IQ.Actual retardation and nonverbal screaming is the result of environmental factors and/or just shitty parenting. Someone who is socially incongruent or has an interest in niche subjects isn’t autistic.
>>16997794You're still a psychopath like elon
This just looks depressing.
>>16957935Lol
Mind boggling how massive space is eh
>>16958609>things are unimportant because they're surrounded by such a huge amount of literal nothingnesslol.
>>16957858there you go nigger
why is it so boring? it's just a massive rock
Okay I will try again: does anyone here know of any illicit human cloning services on the Dark Web? They don't say "you can find anything on the Dark Web, anything at all" for nothing do they? So where is it?I really want this girl I know and like but if I can't have her than I might as well have a clone of her instead. Would be the closest thing there is.
>>17005746Okay thanks. I will check it out sometime then.
sweet, we don't get many glownigger b8 threads on /sci/....must be a slow day at Langley HQ.
>>17005776huh?
>>17004837This thread glows in the dark
>>17004837Can't read shit captain
Is there even a chance we will find out how universe work? I mean something real and not balls that are bending spacetime or some made up quantum magic.
>>16994730Flip that switch
>>16999729>>17001753lol
>>16999729Most of the single line posts are glowies trying to shit up threads for some reason? Like, I get it on /pol/ and /x/ is stop info seeping out and make the board seem shit but do not get why they do it on /sci/ If anyone dropped anything too crazy here they would just pull the thread since it's a pretty slow board.
>>16994730In some senses, no, it can’t be done. Even if we have some proposed fundamental model that explains what the universe is made of and why it evolves the way it does, any measurements we make regarding it are (by definition) going to be a part of that fundamental system, thus rendering them unable to provide data that would be counter to such a model. Now, if one supposed that the universe is indeed nestled in some background, such as a computer simulation, then what can be made of that? The answer is that it inevitably leads to the same situation, where one has to either continue to nestle the more fundamental structures within deeper models or consider that their universe be background-independent. Either way, no matter how far the chain extends, one’s universe is ultimately free of external influence. Reality is therefore self-contained, and questions such as what it is made of can only be confidently answered as “being made of itself”. You can find a lot of answers (i.e. frames of reference) that answer this question, though each one would have to be consistent with that one thing, reality, being referenced. Information, consciousness, love, all these answers to your age-old question are common viewpoints that are able to be reconciled with each other. One could say the universe is made of hotdogs, that hotdiggity dogs is life, though language itself presupposes how accessible that frame of reference is.
>>16999729I approve of the frog threads.
Moon far side
>>17002250EVERYONE was mad anon. They demanded an apology. They accused him of reinforcing flat earther doctrine.
All these space pics are composites right? The photographers and Nasa add overlays to make it look pretty?
>>16950507why is this thread so old
>>17006282The bot bumps it every 2-3 days. It's doing the same thing on almost two dozen threads. You can see it replying to itself for weeks above.
>>17006417Can we name it?
1. A Martian colony is vastly harder than anyone admits.Elon and the Mars enthusiasts make it sound like we're one big reusable rocket away from turning Mars into a second Earth. Reality: We are not even close to solving the fundamental problems of Radiation, Gravity, and Dust.2. The "self-sustaining" claim is science fiction. Realistic timelines suggest that for the next 50–100+ years, any Martian settlement will be completely dependent on Earth.3. The economics are terrible. Mars is a money black hole. It's basically a giant philanthropic/science project dressed up as frontier capitalism.
We’re going to Mars. We are going to terraform over hundreds of years. Going to the moon is gay, but we don’t have a choice, there’s too much shit we need there and it’s too easy to send that stuff to Mars and Earth not to do it. We are developing the drugs to make low gravity not fatal to humans (t-cell function and blindness, etc) but humans on the moon or mars long term is still not medically possible, technologically it isn’t a problem. I get it, Elon bad, but we need another planet. We need to get cooking.
>>17005544I'm on Linux, bitch. I thought you GNU.
>>17005661So a few people die. We have billions of replacements.
The truth is Starship was always meant to fail, it was never going to work. The truth is Space X is a military venture and it uses the Mars lie to cover for it's true intentions. The plan is endless drown swarms powered by AI and linked via Starlink. The Starlink military grid will be constantly replenished with back up satellites as they get merc'd by Russia and China respectively. Then Kessler Syndrome will set in thanks to WW3 and that too is all part of the plan. The aliens who trap us on Earth and watch us don't want us to escape the Gravity Well so they are going to trigger Kessler Syndrome and WW3 to retard our space progress by hundreds or even thousands of years.
>>17005499>Radiation, Gravity, and Dust.Nevermind that, the energy requirements alone needed to send human(s), all their life support and fuel, and bring them back, make it a fantasy.
Okay fine, if I can't do this through the Dark Web (despite being so reliably informed one can find anything on there, anything at all) how can I clone this crush of mine MYSELF? What would you science-y people recommend? I mean, how do they do it for animals? I will stop at almost nothing to have this girl.
>>17007835Literally just look into how they do it for cattle, its all public.Oh, and humans can be brought to term in a pig, dont ask me how I know
>>17007843Is there a way to do it where they don't come out as a baby?
>>17007847What do you mean? Gene mix? Not really. Cloning is much easier than that.You'd need a human embryo, cooling gear, her DNA (or an embryo if you could steal one) lab gear, and something to put it in. Ideally a Ukranian woman
>>17007849I am half Ukrainian, on my mom's side. Also this girl is blonde.
>>17007861Practice extracting eggs from pigs/animals, kidnap crush, extract eggs without scrambling, replace egg contents with DNA, keep somewhere cold, find Ukrainian women to implant into.
Bharatian scientist rule.
>>17003972>poo science is real>all wires are bury under the mud because REASONS and not because it's plugged into another power sourceyou should 100% hand over your bank account and visa number the next time a poo call you 3 in the morning telling you that he's from IRS and his name is ADAM SMITH while with a accent so thick that you think he's still speaking poo
They couldn't even try to hide the wires to the real power source. Didn't attempt to plug in the pump without the movement.
poos: 1, /sci/: 0
>>17003972>>17004213>>17004912>Indians inventing turbines and generators out of salvaged scrap metal and giant magnetsI expect to see one of these with a Liveleak watermark.
>>17004213Fucking kino. Bharatiyas are the best.
mass = 1/bulkquantum phenomena, gaussian distribution is emergent from process of quantization itself and not reflective of the underlying reality. black-hole boundary paradox revealed to be bulk voids. if our three-space universe is a projection like a wake in bulk-space limited to three-space, it is a mirror of how our three-space is reduced to two-space and polar vortices in black holes leading to the holographic principle. likewise, this explains the "speed of light" (misnomer) and relativity as units (1) of information entropy in an anisotropic bulkspace. it identifies that there is no "in side" to a black-hole, and that dark matter is aligning with Hawking's hypothesis of primordial black holes. the majority of our three-space appears to be occupied by this state, which would be the low-density "anisotropic bulk wake", where the "big bang" was simply akin to a mass being dropped into a pond with the ripples distributing the energy to renormalize the state. It also makes "dark energy" an emergent phenomena, due to that unit density of the bulk appearing in inverse to us as greater red-shift and "distance" simply due to the increasing density to bulk unit normal. c would be the wave propagation rate through the bulk medium at normalized density. the difficulty here is how to generalize the bulk density as asymptomatic renormalization rather than linear. however this is not difficult in log-reciprocal-space and again becomes a naturally emergent phenomena. under nyquist-shannon, given reality is a fractal rather than band-limited then quantization will always produce spikes when sampling-phase happens to align with underlying aliased frequency peaks. likewise, black-holes seem to map to the underlying 2d boundary layer in bulkspace. it seems everything is tidied up and neat now. there is nothing left to understand, no questions remain.
https://youtu.be/4g0p_mfboCI
{ "title": "A Conformal 5D Braneworld Model: Resolving Horizon Regularity and Information Capacity via Logarithmic Parameter-Space Mappings", "authors": ["Anonymous"], "abstract": "We present a novel 5-dimensional (5D) warped braneworld framework that regularizes the bulk-brane boundary without introducing artificial mathematical cutoffs. By mapping the higher-dimensional bulk density onto a unified log-power exponential coordinate metric ($e^{-w/2}$), the classical linear divergences of extra-dimensional gravitational scaling are asymptotically renormalized as an inherent geometric property of the manifold. We apply this coordinate architecture to the event horizon of a Kerr-type black hole, demonstrating that the boundary functions as a strict bulk-brane topological interface. Utilizing the $d+1$ simplex dimension principle, we show that the transition from the stable 3-space bulk wake to the horizon forcibly strips a spatial vertex, reducing a 3D volume tetrahedron to a 2D surface triangle. This coordinate degeneracy locks incoming information into latitudinal circular data tracks governed by a linear geometric capacity limit of $\pi \\cdot x$, where $x$ represents the perpendicular distance from the central axis of rotation. At the coordinate poles ($x \\to 0$), the geometric capacity vanishes, naturally funneling remaining energy states into a 1D axial vortex characterized by an emergent Gaussian probability distribution derived from the filtration of continuous bulk frequency peaks. This framework provides an intuitive, structurally self-consistent topological mechanism for the Holographic Principle, demonstrating why information capacity bounds scale directly with 2D boundary geometry rather than 3D volume."}
The Core Idea: The Edge of the ShadowImagine a massive, endless screen filled with a glowing, intricate pattern that repeats itself at every scale, from infinite to microscopic. This master pattern is the true reality (the Bulk). Our universe—the three-dimensional space we live in—is not a solid room. It is actually just a shadow cast onto a specific section of that screen. We do not live in the shadow; we live and communicate strictly along the edge of the shadow, where the empty darkness meets the intense light of the master pattern. Because we are born along this boundary line, our perspective is backward. We look down at the edge toward the shadow and think it is the only reality, unaware that the brilliant glowing pattern behind us is reality itself. 1. What are Matter and Gravity? If our universe is the edge of a shadow on a patterned screen, what are objects like planets, stars, and human bodies? Matter is a Low-Density Vacancy: A single particle or a massive planet is a localized area where the glowing pattern has been hollowed out, making the shadow deeper. Gravity is the Bulk Pressure Flux: the rest of the master pattern exerts a constant, inward pressure to keep the system balanced. When you drop an object, it isn't being "pulled" down by a mysterious tractor beam. Instead, the pressure of the glowing reality is pushing the object toward the deepest part of the shadow vacancy, because entropy naturally equalizes into gaps.note from editor: it gets too stupid from here on out so snip snipthe imitation game, still light years from us when Alan pretends to be a girl with his program
timecube part 2: explicit editionA better summary would be that we're facing a lot of problems with the standard physical models currently. Often times the solutions such as relativity are to somewhat "turn things on their head". By looking at what we're doing (sampling) and the innate consequences of that, we can eliminate many of the phenomena of sampling (Gaussian function, probability distributions, waves/particles) as being sourced from reality. When we examine the remainder, we need a model that allows us to view these as natural phenomena. The most simple model I've been able to come up with is inversion (taking it a little too literally) such as the inverse of a function or the natural base of logarithms e. 1/e = e is the sort of "natural scale factor" we're looking for to unify all the properties we observe that can't be accommodated for as emergent from our quantization and sampling processes themselves.Einstein took decades to finally publish his recognized papers. He had an inkling for his "feelings" about relativity during his teens, but providing mathematical proof to encompass known systems while showing their flaws were emergent from unnecessary approximations is a process of extraordinary difficulty.Likewise, I've "felt" reality as a fractal since my early childhood as a toddler. As simple as looking at your own hands for example, you should recognize their fractal nature immediately if you are capable. (*stares at hands whilst thinking of time-cubes*) This nature appears to extend across all scales of our reality. The mistake may be that if we are in 1/bulk space, or bulk(x), that we assume what we perceive to be linear-space is "natural". Whereas it seems more probable that an asymptotic nature is more probable, and this can be produced via logarithmic transformation by recognizing the mathematical "order" of operations such as addition, multiplication, exponentiation and tetration are in fact all the same as their negatives in abstract.
Such as,slog_e(e) = 1slog_e(1/e) = 0slog_e(1) = -1Or something like that, perhaps, from my crackpot limited knowledge perspective.
Why is this happening? Why are scientists either disappearing or dying randomly? Especially advanced scientists?
>>17003321A genius who becomes a terrorist when he discovers that the company he works has the right to decide how to use the results of his work. Actually a metaphor for Jews not being allowed to rob people.
>>16960574Natural selection.
>>17005606Thought that was Roark in 'The Fountainhead' who blew up a building that was built with plans altered from ones he made. Galt was such a longwinded gasbag that I can't remember what his specific motivation was.
>>16960574Deported by ice
you are bugs
hey I want to find friends that want to research those things and we start projects irl we talk on discord telegram write your username if youre interested
How many dimensions are there?
>>17001031Ayo derr are four twenteeee dimensions mang
>>17001031The real numbers are an infinite dimensional vector space over the rationals. So the answer is infinite.
>>17001613Is this why you get christains online saying that they're the real Israelites?
>>17007612It's the only cope they have left.
>>17007751>yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table
