Anti-mass has zero special dimension, and it still influences gravitational waves in an interesting way. Anti-mass is responsible for the gravitational distance limitation, it also causes the speed limit of light speed. Too bad there are so many evil Scientists who won't bat an eye about stealing this. Anti-mass slows down the propagation of gravitational waves. You couldn't find it or figure this out because you don't understand the math behind it.
If E = anything < 0 What you could only consider to be DATA becomes trapped in subspace pockets that are infinitely small. These subspace pockets containing DATA, are in fact blips of inverted special dimension,
Different scales of Anti-mass would react with certain frequencies of gravitational and energy emissions.
Something that is infinitely small can contain infinitely complex DATA, and then that DATA has a sort of negative energy potential. The amount of data in the special inverse dimension with no coordinates in 3 dimensional space would correlate to the scale of the dark "matter" anomaly.
>>16780204>Too bad there are so many evil Scientists who won't bat an eye about stealing this.Don't worry. No scientist will be stealing your retarded rambling and incoherent gibberish about something that doesn't even exist.
What would happen if a white baby had a black man's Y chromosome (Or vice versa)?
>>16780112Very little, beside determining sex the Y chromosome does almost nothing
>>16780112Eugenic would happen. When we are able to switch chromosomes, next step is getting rid of "bad" genes.
>>16780121Would the baby be more aggressive?
>>16780112We don’t know of any specific patterns of genes tied to specifically black men’s Y chromosome, so the baby will probably display many specific traits the dad has
>>16780148Depends on how you raise it.Culture has a bigger impact on your character then genetics.
The big bang didn't happen.It's pseudoscientific nonsense.
>>16778331>>16778700Jesus Christ you lowits have to shit up every thread with your drivel.
>>16779672> we need to assume that it was a singularity that explodedThe modern big bang model does not include a singularity. Inflation is the earliest time theory can go back to, where the universe was at a finite size and density. Nobody assumes a primordial singularity. You're debating an antiquated idea.>>16779485>Just because you see something now doesn't mean that the same thing was happening for billions of yearsYou can never prove anything in science. All there are are degrees of evidence. In the case of the hot big bang you have the most direct evidence in the form of the cosmic microwave background. First the big bang model predicted the CMB's existence. Which was confirmed by observers. It also predicted it was a precise blackbody spectrum, unlike any known light source. Again confirmed. And most spectacularly it predicted the detailed angular fluctuations, including these peaks which originate from acrostic waves in the primordial plasma. The CMB gives a direct picture of the early universe, and it looks exactly how big bang theory predicted. There is a reason serious alternatives to big bang cosmology all died out in the 90's. It's not enough to say "you can't prove my random assertion wrong", the burden of proof is on anyone promoting an alternative to show that it can actually fit the observations available today. Real cosmology is a quantitative science, not pulling random assertions out of your ass.
>>16778773>The whole thing is refutable in 3 lines of simple geometry.Go ahead then.
>>16778269>we can see expansion and contraction in some places,Can we though? Is there any proof to that?
>>16777713Maybe
How do you think civilization would have been affected if Earth was the size of Jupiter? Nothing else changes in terms of life and gravity, etc. For one, it would take months to circle the planet by plane.
>>16777343if the earth was so big I think they wouldnt have developed the same language. Probably they can talk on the Internet but they wont because they use different languages and so they don't have things to hate each other about.
>>16777910The planet still would have had just 1 country/entity that created the internet technology first, and the rest of the planet probably still would have adopted it instead of making their own separate and incompatible systems from scratch.
>>16776748Your Granddad fucked your brains out through your ass.
>>16776323Is it still shaped like earth, like the same exact landmasses of earth but scaled up, or are there entirely new continents?
>>16776323Everything would change when earth would have the mass of jupiter. Solar system would look different.
>>16778064>amnesiatotal, like total wipe with 0 possibility of getting anything back
>>16778066+ full genetic randomization, forgot to mention. you'd morph into anything possible in the human spectrum, sexually as well. roll of the dice really. but you get to stay immortal
https://youtu.be/UKuwEntIa74
>>16774358same
>>16778069If I was smart enough to set up a progressive teust fund to pay for the train and education in my next life.I am probably there financially today, and late 50's, so my mortality approaches.But then you really gheyed it up. A lot.
Help /sci/. I had a tube in my lungs due to a collapsed lung and now 2 months later, the stitch marks are super itchy and just as raised as before. Did a worm die inside it or something?
>>16779573stitches didn't dissolve. I had them removed. No not a lot of sun and no sun on that area.
>>16779535this is a keloid(raised scar) granuloma(growth) that can happen as a reaction to suture material. Although, they likely used "prolene"(fishing line, basically) that is usually quite inert, but reactions can still occur.It looks like it may be getting rubbed every time your arms swings by, which could be causing the redness. you can use a topical hydrocortisone cream to reduce the swelling, but it doesn't appear to be spreading to the surrounding areas, which would indicate infection. you may even be able to simply text a pic to your primary, or the surgeon, to see if they think there is any reason for concern, but I doubt. A chest tube is a bid deal, Anon, so it may take time to heal. If it gets more "angry"/red/irritated, go see your doc and ask about antibiotics, but we try not to use those more than needed these days, if we can help it. This is not medical advice.
>>16779535See a doctor not 4chan you madman.
>>16779748Yeah wtf is he doing.
>>16779597there are stitches that dissolve but I don't think they use them for the really serious stuff
Hello anons, I am a student of economics and I deeply regret my choice of degree. It's too late for me to change my major now because I don't want to spend my entire life in shitty colleges.When I was still in elementary school my favorite subjects were art, physics and chemistry. I gave up on my desire to study chemistry or physics because that would require me to waste at least 10 years of my life in pursuit of a doctorate that wouldn't get me a job anywhere in my country except maybe as an elementary school teacher - if I'm lucky.As I said, it's too late for me, but I started thinking about learning some of these basic things on my own. Could you please point me to some books that I could read so that I can at least begin to understand some things beyond elementary school level? Also, what can I make with common household chemicals that won't kill me or blow up in my face?
>>16780055It's cute because the dead homeless guy in the subway looks just like a sleeping student if you shoop in a few desks.
We know Bertrand's Postulate, but what about its extensions?For n<p<kn for a real number k, what is the smallest possible k such that the above statement still holds?Now how about if we do it like x<n<p<kn for any integer x? Can we prove definitively that as x increases whatever value k is must strictly decrease? And do we know what limit k approaches if it does strictly decreases? We know that k != 1 because a n simply cannot be such that n>n. So we know k>1 forever, but does k approach 1 as x increases?
>>16779653>real numbers r such that there is always a prime n<p<rnGood question idk>what’s the lim inf as n gets bigI also dk LOL
>>16779653
>scientists say that when a star collapses into a supermassive blackholes, it essentially divides by zero and creates an infinitely dense singularity with infinitely dense matter, but nothing ever escapes from the event horizon of the black hole >scientists also believe that the universe started as an infinitely dense state of matter that keeps expanding outwards indefinitely.Literally what proof is there that our entire universe is just inside a black hole and keeps expanding but will never push beyond the event horizon to the outside of our universe?
>>16778803booba
>>16778803the singularity of rotating black holes are a 1d circle, so their area would be directly equal to the circumference rather than 0
>>16778803Source.
>>16778803i want to get sucked into those black holes
>>16778803Source? I probably need 2000 gallons.
When we talk about evidence for non-human intelligences, it helps to rank claims from least to most credible:Weakest are folkloric and anecdotal accounts — myths of “sky people,” abduction narratives, or supposed out-of-place artifacts. They’re culturally interesting but prone to hoaxes, misperceptions, or psychological explanation.Middle tier are astrophysical anomalies. “Oumuamua” accelerated in ways hard to explain, though natural hypotheses exist. The 1977 “Wow!” Signal and certain Fast Radio Bursts sparked speculation, but remain one-off or likely natural. Tabby’s Star once looked like a Dyson sphere candidate, but dust fits better. These remind us the universe holds mysteries, though “aliens” aren’t the default explanation.Stronger are reported physical traces and physiological effects, like claims of exotic alloys or the “Oz effect” during close encounters. Intriguing, but not yet scientifically verified.Strongest evidence comes from multi-sensor, multi-observer military encounters: the 2004 Nimitz “Tic Tac,” 2015 Gimbal, and others. Pilots, radar, infrared, and visual confirmation all line up, showing craft with extraordinary flight profiles that defy current human technology. Importantly, these aren’t fringe claims — the U.S. Department of Defense and NASA openly admit that some UAP remain unidentified after rigorous analysis.In short: the best evidence is not ancient myths or speculation, but instrument-verified data collected by trained observers and acknowledged by official institutions. That doesn’t prove “aliens” — but it does establish that we are confronting a genuine unknown, one that deserves serious study.
https://youtu.be/UGyMU_GIw4cHere he is after the war sleeping outside the Veterans Affairs center for compensation (denied, again), and being harrassed for being down on his luck.>>16773383>non-human intelligencesThis is literally my specialty.>>16778961>non-human technological intelligence.Who said technology is their advancement?>contradicts our physical models.Cosmological models contradict Physics models all the time, its become quite common is this era.
Is this what /sci/ is now? A single GPT poster replying to himself. Sad.
bump
>>16773383reddit-tier comedy
>>16779833ad hominem is the best you have?
Here's a fun geometry problem for you. Think you can handle it?The disks are sliding along a path defined by the top and bottom walls, they transition from a double file to a single file. What's the equation f(x) for the curve such that α stays constant but β is allowed to change.
>>16773350Maybe I would have tried to find f(x).But I didn't like what this Anonymous wrote:>>16760258>Lol im not not designing gun magazine for you.Then I said "forget it".This thread may be a trap.Or have to do with "fate worsening".
>>16760236Am I a retard, or does this make sense?
>>16760236Vectors anyone?Bottom rail following f(x)Top rail following g(x)Referincing g(x), the path to the center of circle B is 6@90°, therefore the path B takes is parallel to g(x).Referencing f(x), the path to the center of cricle B 6@90° + 12@a, therefore the path B takes is parallel to f(x), retarded by some amount.Dunno where to go from this.If we take the last section as part of it, anything other than a flat line would make a change in the angle, since it becomes 90°.
>>16760236if there was friction alpha and beta would both roll so the angles would seperateif there is no friction then the disk would travel up so that its center was at the height of the single file ones and the beta disk (lol nerd) would travel downward to get to the same place. with rotation these behave like driven gears am i just wetaded
>>16760236>Here's a fun geometry problem for you.your problem is NSFF = not safe for freedom
>we don't see other intelligent life in the universe because it's so rare for a planet to sustain lifeOk, but why don't we see artificial intelligent life which wouldn't have the same limitations as biological life in terms of the environment it can flourish in?We're most likely simply the first intelligent life in the universe.
>>16777656space is too big and ftl is impossible
>>16777695>ftl impossiblebending space between *A and *B can be done with mass and its spacetime bending properties.We know that mass is a "symptom" of boson particles.>create machine that can influence bosons>pump the space between *A and *B full with mass accruing bosons and compact the space between them>go to alpha centauri in an olds mobile with its tank half full
>>16777656We don't see other intelligent life because we're not allowed to. Our government won't let us.
>>1677765617 and 18 are cyborgs.
>>16777656"The Universe" is not a place. There is no "other intelligent life" there since there is nothing at all there.
(Please try to back up some claims with research papers, quorra, at least experience t.medpractitionees)Ive been reading on the web about Morphine, sometimes combined of compered with Ketamine, in traumachirugy but also extreme fractures, extreme injuries, and more. What can you back up or share from experience about the effects of morphin and examples they used it for in hospitals and clinics? (I tried to post it 4 times and got erased due to a shitty brower so I keep the short version).Please avoid the recreational usage stories. We all know that from popping a few raw Poppy's people going to react weird on average.
>>16779880I type fast but my browser sucked (sucks)
>>16779883Have you tried not using morphine?
"Hydrogen times pi"refers to the frequency 4.4623 GHz, derived from multiplying the universal hydrogen line frequency (1420.4 MHz or 1.4204 GHz) by the mathematical constant pi (π).This concept was famously featured in the movie Contact, where it was suggested as a potential extraterrestrial communication signal because pi is a universal constant.
>>16779892Bro, calm down. We don't live in your Schizotopia. Take your Zyprexa
>>16779894(I want to sound smart)
Why is it that non-ugly men are always incels? That's usually a warning sign. Men aren't supposed to be attractive like this. Plus they're usually mentally ill. Why do you think this is? It's a weird paradox.
>>16773919I think he had other reasons he hadn't had girlfriend
>>16773801Omg, he's so fucking pretty. I NEED to have his children
>>16773813
why are people posting the most attractive guys in this thread
>>16773801>>16773859I used to be a twink. Relatively shirt, very skinny, looked "cute" and like a girl. Women were literally throwing themselves on me. Never in my life again was it so easy to get sex. That's of course ends with your twink death, but if this guy can't get laid it is 500% because he is a complete total retard or (most likely) just lying for attention
>All matter is condensed light.Can anyone dispute this?
>>16777299>Light goes out. >Proof? The momentary paddle switch that delivers power to the bulb is physically depressed, removing power to the bulb. I can also test the (lack of) bulb current draw from the outside of the fridge.
>>16775712>can anyone dispute [retarded shit i just made up]Yeah. Basic science. Matter IS a form of energy. But it isn't light. We aren't made of photons. Photons (light) is its own fundamental particle. We are made of matter like neutrons, protons, and electrons. Two of which are themselves comprised of quarks. All of which are distinct from a photon.
>>16778180But who's to say quarks aren't made of photons?
>>16778205Because quarks are already fundamental particles. A fundamental particle doesn't break down into anything except a potential other fundamental particle. We know what a photon is. And quarks are nothing like them.
>>16777982it did create you correct
