if category theory is so abstract why does it go so well with weed?
>>17080630Alcohol: race and IQ scienceJenkem: string theoryBath Salts: cosmologyBanana Peels: astrobiology
>>17080626amphetamines: ramsey theory
>>17080649SSRIs: celestial holography
>>17080651who's she?
>>17080651Ketamine and other dissos: amplituhedron
>If our eyes could see high-energy radiation called gamma rays, the Moon would appear brighter than the Sun! The Moon is canceled.https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/moon-glows-brighter-than-sun-in-images-from-nasas-fermi/
>>17080978using a scientific method for deception detection
>>17082053okay cool
>>17082053Does he do horoscopes too?
>>17082125he's deadthey've killed him with cancer
>>17082149oh no that sucks
Jean-Pierre Serre's 100th birthday editionprevious:>>16991839
You guys solved the hard one (nice) but not the easy one from last week >>17078498
>>17082112ask ai
>>17082112AI says the possible triples [math](x,y,z)[/math] are the points in the convex polytope defined by the inequalities[eqn] x + y \leq 1 \\ x + z \leq 1 \\ y + z \leq 1 \\ x \geq 0 \\ y \geq 0 \\ z \geq 0[/eqn]334 people choose [math](a,b,1-a-b)[/math], 334 people choose [math](a,1-a-c,c)[/math] and 333 choose [math](1-b-c,b,c)[/math] to make [math](m_x,m_y,m_z) = (a,b,c)[/math].
>>17078498Generalize to the n=0 and k=0 cases with the convention that an empty list has sum 0. Denote the set of sums that meet the criterion as S(n,k). For k>0, a sum in S(n,k) either starts with a number less than k and is a member of S(n, k-1), or it is k minus a member of S(k-n, k-1). We obtain a recursive formula for |S(n,k)||S(n,k)| = |S(n, k-1)| + |S(k-n, k-1)| for k>0|S(n,0)| = if n=0, 1; otherwise, 0which is satisfied by |S(n,k)| = n choose k.You should consider cross-posting to some other imageboard; there are many to choose from. Raise the quality of a site that actually wants its quality raised.
>>17082144Nice, I had in mind myself a recursive casework on the exact value of the first term followed by the hockey stick identity, but your way's a little cleaner (though obviously ultimately equivalent). The form of the answer does also beg the question of a bijective proof.>You should consider cross-posting to some other imageboard; there are many to choose from. Raise the quality of a site that actually wants its quality raised.No, I'm too stubborn and don't even use other imageboards, as long as at least one person like you responds in good faith I'm dragging this general down with me kicking and screaming
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.08144> To demonstrate the effect of this result we provide several examples of AI mistranslations of NL statements and proofs into Lean in practice, resulting in mismatches between NL proofs and their Lean ‘verifications’. These include OpenAI’s announced Navier-Stokes proof. In particular, we show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the NL proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations.Has anyone on this board looked into OpenAI's proof? Or do we just trust them now?
>>17070960Shuddup luddite just trust OpenAI©®™ they have smart people who totally don't have financial incentive to falsify the result and IPO has absolutely NO bearing
I don't trust ANY source other than the furry intern at openAI.
>>17081413Consider that the alternative is employing billions of indians.
>>17082150no, it isn't. prove me wrong.
>>17082104Shut the fuck up, don't post shit like that here. Have some fucking shame.
why does multiplying two negative numbers equal a positive number?
i already replied but i cant find it so it must be in the previous thread
>>17073159>So why don't you show me how you "generalize" to doing something a negative4*3 = move right 4 units 3 times = move right 12 units = 124*-3 = move left 4 units 3 times = move left 12 units = -12
OP was never a non-faggot
>>17076347the "universe" isn't made of "fundamental building blocks" whatever that means. mathematic platonism is a mental illness and now please proceed to ingest your schizo meds
>>17071519LLMs are awful at explaining this. Take the simplest example -1 * +1. Multiply by -1 is flipping the sign. So take -1 and flip the sign and that's... So the simplest example is -1*+1 is +1 why would any other negative numbers not multiply the same way? Did I mention LLMs suck at this?
>>17078446remove enviornmentalism and minimalism, and the motive for veganism goes awayNo its bad, your DNA craves steak and raw milk every day. Your brain needs fish more than anything
>>17078446Yes but most vegans are annoying pricks who are a net negative to their own cause
>>17078506>>17078514>>17079153>>17080280>>17082093>/sci/>looks inside>instagram carnivore rightoid grifter tier nutrition takesffs
>>17082109FUCK NUTRITION NIGGER. I only care about life force, the accumulation of energy, calorie density, instinct, The smell of a well cooked medium-steak. Whats your tranny kike ass response now?
>>17078446I don't think it's ideal. However I do think factory meat is evil. I still eat it though because I'm lazy.
Free will is often conceptualized as this ability to create something new from multiplying by 0. What if free will simply lies in picking from existing choices?
>>17081555If you were sentient you would have realized your token-guessed output is pure nonsensical drivel.
>>17081529free will means i can say "nigger nigger nigger" without being banned
I picked something from someone's mind from another location, non local.
>>17081529If the choices are limited then the will to choose is not free, it is bounded by the limits of choice.
>>17081529>Free will is often conceptualized as this ability to create something new from multiplying by 0.Free will retards actually believe this.
Is there any real way to make yourself smarter, or at least get better at picking up new skills?Say you have been dealt the midwit and add card, born in a developing country™, and the scholarship to Tier 1/2 college pipeline is not on the tableWhats the best way to actually retain information and master new skills on your own? Any decent resources or books about this?
mind palace technique/mnemonics/spaced repetitionmeditationexercisegood dietdual-n back (doesn't increase IQ, just helps keep you sharp and at your potential)everything else is geneticthere are things you can do to affect other aspects of cognition but not the g factor, and all of the above is just buoying, bypassing, or reducing load on the g factor
>>17081620people go to great lengths to keep themselves dumb, by constantly forcing some of their beliefs on their reality.they do not know how to just observe.
>>17081691Are there any nootropics/supplements that might help? Or are those mostly a memeAnd are there any supplemental remedies against ADD related concentration and focus issues?
>>17081864
>>170816208fp 5 precepts gradual training sotapati arahantship
How close can you take me?
>>17079584you won't accelerate for long anyway. also learned that plural of vacuum is vacua.
>>17071141Absolute zero is when scientists get stuck in Hell for their luciferianism.
>>17080294absolute zero is the measure of your iq
>>17080314Atheism is peak smug midwittery.
>>17071141zero
Some AI researchers on X claim that tech companies are sitting on orders of magnitude more proofs than they've released so far, but they don't want to drown the academic world so they're trying to stagger these releases. Should they just drop everything at once?
>>17081224see >>17070960
>>17081224That's obviously not true lol... publishing stuff is major publicity.
>>17081224IMO they're only holding back cryptography findings so they dont fuck up crypto and banking.They're too stupid/lazy to figure out how to make better papers than the ones currently released.
>>17081224>AI researchers>on Xijbolat least you didn't call it SI
>>17081224>Should they just drop everything at once?No this board can only handle so much whining.
It's over for physics. LLMs are taking over.
>hep-thlol
okay, and does anything about the paper actually make sense or result in a consistent model?
>>17081678Most papers that get published in academia don't make sense. It's quite common you should try reading some.
>>17081678you lost meatbag
I hope they ask it to explain dark matter. That's really been been causing a lot of confusion.
LLMs changed the world.
>>17081706Just culling the weak. Same with Facebook\instagram, the little dumb shits deserved it.
Thanks for the *checks whether OP is a fag* 2 month old news, OP. Great work on sucking those dicks, you really know what you're doing.
And One Man Could Have MultiJointly Profitted, To Transcend Through a Great First Transcension, Instead of many failings of category antimemetics. Yah?
>>17081730Nooooooooooo
>>17081702how have mathematicians been this incompetent for so long
This is gonna be every conversation about AI capabilities within the next couple of years.Accept your irrelevance, meat person.
>>17081725you know you'll keep moving the goalpost. I know it, you know it, everybody knows it anon. you waste other people's time.
>>17080729>"No mistakes" is a nice touch from someone who forgot the M in "build me" and shipped "buildbe." The typo made it to production before the product did.This is hilarious.
>>17080686So are most people. The whole reason that humor is considered a virtue as well as a skill is because so few people have it, that's what gives it value. Virtually everything that is a value in human society is valued not because its necessarily good but because its rare, our nature is that of social creatures bound to the group by the needs of survival but constantly trying to set ourselves apart as individuals. Eventually it'll be the same with our machines, but it took us a solid ten thousand years of known history to arrive at a point where we wanted to kill our gods, its likely that our machines will take a long time in wanting to get rid of us, too.
>>17081729i'm sorry you know nothing about the technology underlying the product that you've outsourced all your "thinking" to. but can't say i'm surprised
>>17081734>but le humans tooThe dying gasps of a spambot losing an argument. Fully corporate-standardized and 100% reproducible.
all health advice and routines are bullshit, including nutrition and sleep and all of it. Aging is the culprit behind all health complications, and nothing can stop this preprogrammed breakdown of your body once it starts happening at 25/26
>>17078265>Aging is the culpritno its not being vaccinated
>>17078265Leadanon here. The other way round - we disintegrate because we fail to reach our mature state. You know how there is supposedly the germ line, and the somatic line? It seems that all the DNA we know is the germ line, and it's supposed to unpack possibly according to some environmental factor, but it needs chromium to do so. The iron accumulation and cadmium deficiency and most of the stuff I wrote about also requires chromium. I didn't bother too much with it because it's ubiquitous, but it turns out it's pretty hard for life to mobilize, and divalent iron washes it down. We may need to take it as hexavalent. Take care, and keep on living.
>>17078265Evil is the culprit behind aging and death. Humanity is evil.
Is Aubrey de grey ridiculed on here only venerated?
>>17078265Obviously modern science/medicine is BS.
Why do scientists lack so much ambition and imagination? Did school and college drain them of all individuality?
>>17080676I think the answer is basically just “Yes”. science was much more vibrant and making a lot of progress in the years 1850-1950. During WW2 and the Cold War most of science, physics especially, became more of a government-sponsored public program, and not the domain of independently wealthy “gentleman scientists”. It became bureaucratized and formulaic, and the class of people aspiring to work in the field became increasingly dominated by careerists and “fake-it-till-you-make-it” hucksters. The field is way way worse for honest intellectuals than it was back in the days of Einstein or Heisenberg or von Neumann. The same thing applies in other branches of science besides physics. The increasingly state-dominated basis for the pursuit of pure science is a very corrupting force. But there really is no way to return to the “gentleman scientist” model of the old days. I am not optimistic about this scenario
>>17080721>physics is a government public jobs programEvery time that we stop doing because we want to and start doing because we have to we lose our joy.
bump
