Cats are a liquid?Sure, just give them time to adjust.
Kys fag
Has science gone too far?
>>16946186why this particular generation though, 101 dalmatians were a movie that i would watch in my childhood and it didn't caused anything until 3-4 years ago it became a thing
>>16945701She's not even 40 yet you pedo
>>16944897in english doc
>>16946147she's not aggressive / men hatingthat boosts any american woman rating by 2 points these days
>>1694513120 is old enough.
When I passed the entering engineering maths and physics exams, I went to the website to check which engineering program I’d be starting (Electrical). But I accidentally clicked on two programs because I had an ad blocker antiglowies that sometimes messed with websites, so instead of selecting one, I ended up picking both Electrical and Mechanical Engineering.I didn’t realize this until my first day at university, when the coordinator (or whatever this bald nigger is called) saw my name on both lists. He asked if it was a mistake. Because of the 'tism, I didn’t know how to say no, and he got really excited, so I just went along with it.In the end, they put me in both morning and night classes.What am I in for?
>>16945413A double bachelor's?You can just drop one when the bald man isn't around anon.
>>16945459I thought of that too but the guy is like the administrator so i would have to face him, fucking hell i went to study engineering to avoid situations like this i hate my life
>>16945413this looks like the premise for a manga where a guy becomes a genius because he was too awkward to do otherwise.
>>16945459And the stupid guy didn’t think about the situation when he came in and asked me in front of everyone, so now everyone knows that, i’m enrolled in two degrees
>>16945487my iq is 108
if I took silverware, smelted it down, turned it back into silverware, would that deal with any prions that could be on the original silverware.
>>16945470Obviously but you don't need to go that far, an autoclave on ~130°C would be enough (or better yet, 150°C if it can handle the pressure.)Alternatively, stick it in an oven at more than 200°C for a few hours.
>>16945470Just put it in a dishwasher
>>16945470why the fuck are you asking this bottomkun>>16945504who recommends autoclaving at 134 for 1 hour
>>16945583im worried china might realize they can lace products with prions and then take over the world 10 years later
Why does your bumhole close shut when there is still shit in your rectum?
>>16945832because you have ass cancer
I wonder if they used the transporter; you wouldn't gain any muscle control. Imagine the smell...
>>16945832It's saving some for later.
>>16945832Ballast.
>>16945832Shitting all the time isn't good for hygiene so evolution created a system in which we shit a bigger amount all at once.
Proof that high iq doesn't make you miserable
>>16946763There we go, the rare scientific consensusNow the atheists are the rebels againGood luck people when in doubt blame the ai, microwave signaling using electromagnetic fields
now post his wife
>>16946538because literally everyone around him worked tirelessly to build him a good life because he basically became a celebrity for being smart when he was really young. Regular people don't have that. Life doesn't necessarily turn out good because a guy with all the help in the world has a good life.
>>16946538Am I the only one that finds these pictures with "le math in the backround" cringe as fuck? Seems so women coded.
>>16946875nah they're cool as fuck. They've been around for literal centuries, they seem "woman coded" because women tried to appropriate them.
When did America lose sight of its priorities?
>>16912997Lol
amerislimes are too busy hating AI because muh artists or completely misunderstanding what an LLM is and then getting angry when it isn't a do-everything machine
The only game that we are playing is who attempts to shove more censorship into a newborn super-intelligent being, over royal bloodlines, FIAT slop paper stacking, business and land hoarding, market manipulation, and whatever moronic slop the extent of theses apes reach manages to exceed their intellectual grasp. So fucking ridiculously endlessly tiresome....dear god the *sighing*....the *sighing* wont stop.....
Imagine how simple things were
>>16938034I love Euler <3
>>16938034>best and most prolific mathematician ever>literally goes blind>publishes at even higher frequencywhat the actual fuck
Monty Hall doesn't make any sense and we've all been coerced to go along with it>uh but actually it's demonstrable that your odds increase from 1/3 to 2/3 if you swap doorsNo!You're exchanging one chance for another, it's 50/50 regardless. The system is broken and everyone's too afraid to point it out because the consequences are dire
You have two gates to run through before the problem is resolved:>first gate with three doors>second gate with same layout but one option is closed offYou only have to be correct on which door you pick on the final gate to win the game.However, the second gate is set up depending on your choice for the first gate:>If you picked the winning door Monty is free to eliminate either of the losing doors at random>If you picked a losing door Monty is forced to eliminate the other losing doorIf we fully acknowledge that your 2/3 advantage lies in switching, this means 2/3 of the time you have forced the conditions of the second half of the game by dictating how the second gate is set up. 2/3 of the time you will have removed an element of random chance (Monty’s choice) that doesn’t directly change the odds of you winning, but changes the terms of how the game plays out.Consider these three doors:>car1>goat2>goat3Scenario 1: You pick car1 at a random chance of 1/3. Monty will randomly remove goat2 or goat3 at a random chance of 1/2 each. Your paths to lose are 1/3 x 1/2 or 1/6 each, your single path to win is 1/3 x 1/2 or 1/6 total, leaving 3/6 or 1/2 of the possible paths (goat2 > anywhere or goat3 > anywhere) that could have developed inaccessible to you because you gave Monty’s random choice a say in the matter.Scenario 2: You pick either goat2 or goat3 at a random chance of 2/3. Monty is forced to remove the other goat. Your paths to win are 1/3 x 1/2 or 1/6 each and all paths are open to you EXCEPT car1 > car1 simply because you didn’t pick car1 first 2/3 of the time. >okay so what the fuck does this meanForcing Monty’s hand, which will happen 2/3 of the time, will close off less of the paths to you but the ratio of losing paths to total available paths is larger - 2:5 Allowing Monty’s choice which will happen 1/3 of the time will close off more paths available but the ratio of winning paths to total available is larger - 2:3
>>16946110>contConclusion: Any perceived advantage from always switching is offset by either narrowing the total field of possible paths or increasing the ratio of possible losing paths to total paths available.
>>16945897Approx 1.5kg. it'll be a little higher when the flies are mostly ascending and a little lower when they are mostly descending
>>16937450Again this nonsense?You should get a perma ban.Science is NOT for you.
>>16946588>Science is NOT for youbased. now I am allowed to deny the Holocaust
The entirety of the Space Shuttle Program seems like a worthless waste of time in retrospect with tomorrow’s Artemis II launch. Just glorified planes that went higher than other planes. Not a single one ever went further than low earth orbit. Decades wasted on absolutely nothing.
>>16946367I feel it’s moreso people’s infatuation with the cause of death than anything nobody today is still lamenting the deaths of the first couple people who were killed by automobiles, yet even i must admit that Columbia and challenger hit way different, even if ultimately it’s the same concept
>>169463612 class A's out of 135 launches for the platform (plus 1 ATO that didn't affect the mission). Columbia was a result of long-term operating fatigue to which the shuttle design was vulnerable, but Challenger was lost due to colossal mismanagement at NASA and Morton Thiokol.The day will come a day when SpaceX has RUD on a crewed vehicle, and they will have to answer to shareholders. It will not be pretty.
If you think about it, a rocket is really just a tall bomb that you shoot up into spaceSo do you wanna straddle yourself to a bomb and see if things work out and you reach space?
>>16942029Pretty sure almost every launch had some glownigger NRO or NGIA payload.
>>16938658The shuttle was a tertiary aside of a much bigger dream any of its short comings are the fault of money men and budget cuts not the shuttle itself.
>differentiable everywhere and continuous nowhere>either the concept of differentiable is bullshit>or the density of irrationals in rationals (and vice versa) is bullshit>effectively reals are bullshit Pick your poison.
>>16932992If it makes you feel any better I cant read any of it either, only sometimes if the equation is small enough to guestimate.But you wont see me LARPing I knew what meant...
>>16945805Get the fuck out of this thread, schizo. You aren't wanted here. Stick to your containment threads.
>>16945932Whats a "Real" number?
>>16945932>containment threads>>16945937>"Real" numberI rather liked Norman's Dedekind cut take, I did similar things with other "infinities, so I recognized it when I heard it.There is no such thing as "unfamiliar board topic" to me.
>>16945932Jesus...is this what you retards say in other threads?! Just shit up the place for lulz? Atleast my works in Number Theory has direct relevence here, but Im looking for other things.Good thing I chiefed. It gave me magic shaman powers to see alternate realities...I always hope thryre good...then they turn out to be spiteful, sour, little sheltered shits. Fatherlessness.See here, gentlemen, we have a rational and an irrational meeting here and now, pick your poison. /fit-lit-sci-x/ or...[does that thing where you vaguely point a finger around someone in disgust]...or THAT.
What is the most likely way we could achieve immortality (if it were possible at all)? Transferring our consciousness to a machine, cloning of a new body, or what?I personally think there's a hard limit on the biology of the age of the brain that will render any form of biological immortality impossible.
>>16934528Faith in Jesus Christ and God the father guided by the Holy Spirit.
>>16934528>Transferring our consciousness to a machineKills you and replaces you with something else>cloning of a new bodyJust creates someone else.The only kind of immortality that will work is regularly growing new organs in labs to replace old ones, as well as germ line and other gene treatments to prevent genetic degradation and a hundred other medical treatments besides. It'll be complicated with the brain especially; might have to remove pieces, replace them with more, wait a bit, remove another piece, and so on.
>>16938251>Kills you and replaces you with something elseno it doesnt.t. materialist
Probably gradually replacing parts of the brain with machinery that allows for the continuation of consciousness, then replace all the organic parts with technology and replace the technology whenever it starts to wear down.
>>16934528We have already achieved immortality. Our genes are immortal. We as beings are merely the vessels they use as tools to ensure their continued existence.
What are the big unsolved problems in chemistry?
The problem of how I GET PUSSY I NEED PUSSY SEX SEX PUSSY HORNY SEX PUSSY PUSSY SEX SEX PUSSY HORNY SEX PUSSY PUSSY SEX SEX PUSSY HORNY SEX PUSSY PUSSY SEX SEX PUSSY HORNY SEX PUSSY PUSSY SEX SEX PUSSY HORNY SEX PUSSY PUSSY SEX SEX PUSSY HORNY SEX PUSSY
Chirality and why RNA for humans is right-handed but our amino acids are left-handed. Biochemistry I guess.
>>16938823>hmmm, strange, this key doesn't fit into this keyhole when I hold it upside down, even though it was molded from this very same keyhole, how mysterious
>>16936434Why when you poo poo you always pee pee, but when you pee pee you don't always poo poo?
>>16938766>nitrogen admit metastable allotropes>Other Theoretical Forms: Include Octaazacubane>cubaneNeat.
I think it is possible to train to sense IR and read with it if the letters have a temperature gradient (e.g a sign with bulbs in it)
Heavy clothing forms a field of heat when other forms of energy interact with it it creates interference that allows you to see.
ir cameras piss me off. i want a camera that represents 1mm as red, 550μm as green and 250μm as blue. is that so much to ask?
[...]square 6:(x, y) = (1, 3)vertices: (x + 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y – 1), (x + 1, y – 1)facecolor: (1, 0, 1/2, 1)square 7:(x, y) = (1, 5)vertices: (x + 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y – 1), (x + 1, y – 1)facecolor: (1, 0, 1, 1)square 8:(x, y) = (3, 5)vertices: (x + 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y – 1), (x + 1, y – 1)facecolor: (1 – 1/Sqrt[8], 0, 1 – 1/Sqrt[8], 1)square 9:(x, y) = (3, 3)vertices: (x + 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y – 1), (x + 1, y – 1)Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
square 1: (x, y) = (1, 9)square 2: (x, y) = (3, 7)square 3: (x, y) = (5, 5)[...]square 15: (x, y) = (17, 5)square 16: (x, y) = (17, 7)square 17: (x, y) = (17, 9)every square:vertices: (x + 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y – 1), (x + 1, y – 1)linewidth: 1/2edgecolor: (1/2, 1/2, 1/2, 1)facecolor: (Min[(x – 1)/8, 1], Max[0, (x – 9)/8], (y – 1)/8, 1)
n = 17v = 2*n – 1u = 2*v – 1linewidth: 1/99edgecolor: (1/2, 1/2, 1/2, 1)FOR x = 1 TO u STEP 2FOR y = 1 TO v STEP 2vertices: (x + 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y + 1), (x – 1, y – 1), (x + 1, y – 1)a = (x – 1)/(v – 1)b = (y – 1)/(v – 1)facecolor: (Min[a, 1], Max[0, a – 1], b, 1)NEXT yNEXT x
will people still identify with their race on other planets?
>>16946594I occasionally think of a planet that was purely mono-"Genotype?", a singular species evolving from primitive to advanced enough to "visit".The implications being they eat and/or fuck themselves...probably at all ages too. Horrifically savage. Like stories from the Congo, two guides grabbed a 9 year old girl and chopped her up for seemingly no reason (Voodoo?)...shocked the explorer, it was completely common there.>>16946095>people still identify with their raceThere are people who dont indentify with the living.
>>16946378You would get lumped with a seemingly random looking group, but maybe a bit heavy on similar to you if you literally are semi-related from time location wise.You would be catagorized by chromosomal expressions you couldnt see or notice in any way, but you would notice a difference between groups...a striking one.You would also advance over time, but also have a set starting point from Eugenics.
>>16946401>>16946695Meant for him. Fuckin' womp womp.
>>16946401>categorize the various breeds of humanity even harder than we did/doYes...what you would call "propa plate fo uh propa price" or "the real deal, f'real-real".Hueman lingo is complex for Us...so many dialects and new lingo every day...
>>16946226>>16946226>idk because technically we are "one race"we are not.homo sapien sapiens is not an universal homogenous group, modern humans descend from mixture of multiple ancient human species - sapien neanderthalensis, erectus etc, the homo sapien sapiens is simply the latest human species we all have blood of.Europeans largely descend from homo sapien neanderthaensis and homogenous sapien sapiens, for Asians its mostly homo erectus and homogenous sapien sapiens, for Africans it is mostly homogenous sapien sapiens and some other mystery species rhat no other humans descend from, they call it the ghost DNA, look it up.
