The more I read between the lines regarding intent behind some of the scientific establishment the more I lean towards the opinion that there is a secret society of very rich and powerful people leveraging the skills of scientist for their own nefarious purposes.>Immortality researchBecause I'm rich and don't want to die.> Starlink, SpaceX, TeslaWill be used for Internet on mars, will be the ship used to get there, responsible for robotic transportation on Mars.Do you believe any of us will receive a starship escort there?>AICreating a new god, with the hopes that it solves all of our problems, will be controlled by the ultra wealthy.Palantir and the like for mass surveillance.I'm sure there's more, and you could begin making some connections, but these are just some parralels I've noticed on the fly regarding the most popular "leading frontiers of science".I'm sure the actual engineers doing the work at these companies aren't revealed the true intent of it.
bump
>>16861928When the spinning ball-Earth is finally exposed worldwide for the 400+ year deception it was, Earth's entire population will suddenly be faced with the reality that every government, every space agency, university, secret society, religious organization, mainstream and alternative media outlet have ALL been duplicitous in propping up a monstrous manipulation to fleece and control the masses. The resulting mass mental exodus away from the control system is exactly what humanity needs. Once the flat Earth truth gets out, these lying politicians, spokesmen, reporters and teachers suddenly change from being heralded voices of authority to being ridiculed, shunned and denounced as they deserve. Once the flat Earth truth gets out, these governments, universities, media outlets and other entangled organizations which have long been hard at work weaving this multi-generational ball-Earth myth, suddenly and completely lose all credibility. Once the truth of our flat Earth gets out, so does the truth of these few elite families/societies who have kept this most important and fundamental reality from us for these hundreds of years! Essentially, once the flat Earth truth gets out, so does every other important truth by proxy, because this "mother-of-all-conspiracies" holds under its umbrella literally ALL of the other conspiracies, and exposes them.
>>16861929fpbp
>>16861952you preceive them as real problems because thats where the accademic interest lies because thats where the funding goes.How bluepilled are you?
>>16861952Because Elon's got a boner fantasy for colonizing Mars and being immortalized as a Colombus-like figure for the next 500 years.
It's too controversal for A.I. to answer, and I know DNA effects your pheramones and there must be some inherent feature outside of diet, why do Asians smell so strange like plastic byproducts or like burning paint that's been rained on?
>>16865893>this junk paper was actually published kek
>>16866829If that were true how come I smell a wooden vaguely cinnamon stench of classist white patriarchy from just your post? Scientifically speaking bitch
>>16866123>>16865658>>16865607yea people smell like what they eat. some cultures eat a lot of strong, pungent, toxic substances like garlic and spices which gives them a stronger odour than more innocuous foods. i don't mean a little bit but a huge amount in every meal. this is not strictly tied to race. e.g. within india and china the cuisines vary a lot including people who don't eat a lot of pungent things. some indians don't even eat garlic.
>>16865404They don't?My wife is Chinese and has almost no body odor. She could wear the same socks or panties for days and there would be almost no smell. In my experience it's the same for all the other (female) Chinese people I know.Meanwhile, I smell like cheese.
>>16865607>spicy foods, in particularA friend of mine from India, working at the Department of Pharmacology at the university also stated this was the case for Indians like himself. He also claimed white people smelled like milk, which I found weird.>white people, famously, can produce quite a strong oniony body odor, a "wet dog" odorWhat??Chinese and Japanese friends/colleagues had no odor.
Is reality smooth
>>16868282Reality is what humanity defines it to be. If the observer effect holds true then that means that reality is subjective to the humanity. The only reason why there is a probability that light can be a particle or wave is because we impose the observation but using a third party like a sensor removes the ability to choose an outcome. Reality can be smooth if we want it to be if we find a way to control what quantum state a particle collapses into.
>>16870563>If the observer effect holds true then that means that reality is subjective to the humanity.Everyone get a load of this retard.
>>16870660I mind over matter you to have gender dysphoria
It depends on how far you zoom in
>>16870700Why would you want that you fucking pervert?
Why do this bastard color exist even when physical reality says it shouldn't? Our brain is a trickster and I hate it.
>>16866711Apparently "qualia" is the scientific term for "soul" and "spirit"
>>16859032Bastard bitch bloody color disappear you!
>>16859032Pink is just light magenta instead of light red
>>16867609Until such that as you present a qualiatron particle.
>>16867609yes
I see students running through the halls... pulling out hair... cramming... I don't wanna be like that. I want to leisurely browse my textbook in a relaxed pose. Occasionally I will stand up and stretch or take a sip from my water, milk, or tea. When I study with friends I want them to relax too. How can I make this happen? Has anyone ever tried studying while being totally tao te ching zen before? All the experiences I read about or see in media are bundles of nerves
>>16865977>study with friendsngmiconsider sparing yourself some debt or get ready to strangle your dream like a spartan puppy>leisurely browse my textbook in a relaxed posefuck off with your vibe edjutainment fantasy aestheticNOTICE NOWHERE DID YOU SAY ANYTHING ABOUT BEING GOOD AT THE SCI CAREERget your priorities straight
>>16866190subtip: don't put off your homework til the day before it's due. Work on it in little bits through the week.
>>16867617Look man I made an observation about unhealthy student behaviors and I’ve seen people burn out and the opposite of burn out is chill out. Then there are some people who never burn out and keep going. These people are chill and I want to be like them and chill out. At the end what matters is results and I want my results to be a sharp relaxed mind that understands the fundamentals and can build on that knowledge and a healthy body that puts what I learned to good use in the field. A scientist who’s half-dead before his career even starts is useless. I want to be alive.
>>16865977Go to the library and actually study everyday. If you don't understand something don't pick up your phone and browse 4chan/etc. If you are capable of this you can get any undergraduate degree you want.
>>16868330>A scientist who’s half-dead before his career even starts is useless. I want to be aliveYour leisurely pace will delay the start of your career so you may still be half dead according to the longer lifespan.And you are squandering neuroplasticity. Your learning pace will slow as you age.Strike while the iron is hot.>I’ve seen people burn outThey aren't necessarily burning out because of trying too hard. The trying hard may be a symptom of struggling to keep up. They are probably burning out after making an assessment of their own capabilities relative to others'.Imagine if it wasn't stem and you wanted to get good at basketball.If you aren't tall enough or young enough you will not be competitive no matter hard you try or how leisurely you try. Most non-retarded people would make the correct decision to give up in that case and pursue something they are more gifted at.Good luck, Sisyphus
Do you agree with this quote? Is becoming successful physicist considerably harder that becoming a good mathematician?
depends on the physics, math is pure abstraction so they can all be grouped together
>>16870665What does it mean to be "too good for philosophy"? I can only read this as it would be a waste of mathematical talent pursuing non-mathematical philosophy
>>16870689it means philosophy is just feels expressed in natural language. it's easy to feel, but i don't agree with polya's attitude about math relative to philosophy. some people feel better than others.physicists aren't more skilled than mathematicians.
>tfw too smart for philosophy
>>16870707Maybe he meant too proud for philosophy, not enought pride for physics. We are missing context.
Exact sequence edition.ITT: Discussion of mathPrevious thread: >>16803023
>>16870677Do you at least know what a Sobolev Space is?
>>16870583Got it.
>>16835273who pioneered exact sequences in the first place?
>>16841010Through herehttps://csg.igrothendieck.org/or herehttps://stacks.math.columbia.edu/according to >>16841222 whose numerals are checked.
>>16870677Can't tell you much without seeing the itenary, but if your analysis course covered Lebesgue integration then you'll be fine.Funnily enough I just signed up for functional analysis too.
>we still don’t have cure for common cold
>>16866433>>>The garlic has antibiotic properties.>>But if you put it in oil it suddenly breeds the most deadly bacteria lol.In the medieval, they had a receipe for an eye ointment that consisted out of onions, garlic, wine and ox bile. “What we found was very interesting – we found that Bald’s eyesalve is incredibly potent as an anti-Staphylococcal antibiotic in this context,”>>But if you put it in oilTo seal the surface against germs the garlic have to be entirely covered.>>suddenlyLeft to be stand for nine days.>>the most deadly bacteriaMRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a type of staph bacterium that does not respond to commonly used antibiotic treatments. MDROs are bacteria and other organisms that are resistant to one or more antimicrobial treatments.>>lol.I hope that from now on it hurts your head to type such crap.
>>16863536The cure is hot soup, tea, and rest in bed. Don't take pain relievers because those just prolong it.
>>16870564>most deadly bacteria>MRSAlel no I think MDR vibrio got MRSA lethality-mogged. I beat cutaneous MRSA with just a few weeks of doxycycline plus keflec.
>>16863536if you can vaxx covid you can vaxx a cold.https://www.bitchute.com/video/hvRoX959WIBH
>>16870676I stopped reading at lel
why does 1/3 not "really" equal .333... ? explain this NOW
>>16870045Done. See: >>16867365
>>16870128cool!
>>16870128have these for posterity1/2
>>168701282/2
>>16869408It does.[math]9\cdot \frac{1}{9} = 1[/math][math]9\cdot \lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}10^{-k} = 1[/math][math]\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}3\cdot 10^{-k} = \frac{1}{3}[/math]This argument works using limits in Q.
>LIGHT WILL ACT DIFFERENTLY WHEN YOU AREN'T LOOKING AT IT>YOU CAN'T CHECK! IT WILL CHANGE ITS BEHAVIOUR IF YOU TRY TO LOOK!>THERE IS NO WAY TO CHECK THIS, TRUST ME IT WILL CHANGE ITSELF!!!!Im not believing this shit
>>16869984>do the slit experiment with my eyes opened>wave behaviour>do the slit experiment with my eyes closed>wave behaviourwave-particle duality bros acked
You cannot observe without influencing. Why is it so hard for midwits to understand? Even in Electrostatics 101 the professor ought to have told you about the "sample charge" ordeal
>>16870290>i wish i could spin plates and yo-yo>and write>and publishKeep drumming, Phil.
>>16870298>i wish i could spin plates and yo-yoI don't want to be a QM scientist, no.
>>16870291/thread
>2025>Still undefeated
>>16870121Remember to take your watch off when you're catching rays folks
>>16870121>UndefeatedDunno man, I think the IRS defeated him pretty thoroughly.
>>16870121He's such a piece of shit it's almost unbelievable I couldn't legit cunt like this can exist without being killed
/sci/ientistsA question: The Patent SystemNet negative or net positive?Consider all facets.Does this antiquated system slow us down as a civilization or not?
>>16864775>Nah. If you're an individual or small business they cost ~$1600 iirc.Patents are simple intellectual property rights. Once granted, they give you the right to defend them at enormous cost, but nothing more. If the intellectual property is good, it will be copied anyway, either by small companies that will restructure after a lawsuit, or by large companies where you will be dealing with a whole team of lawyers and usually have no idea what is going on behind the scenes in the negotiations.There are part of the neofeudalism of today and the usual scam big business turns anything into.
>>16864801Strictly speaking, it is 20 years from filing, so the 20 years also include the years of prosecution when it was a pending application.
>>16864802>it was a way to protect people who ACTUALLY PRODUCED, BUILT thingsThe pharma industry is based on small startups that develop new active compounds, get a patent on this, do initial testing, and then sell their rights to the big pharma corporations. The reason is that a startup can no longer afford the enormous cost of testing and getting marketing permissions frm FDAA etc. Without patent rights independent of own production, it would not be cost effective to start basic research into new compounds.Also in electronics and consumer goods you have similar situations. Fast moving consumer goods are utterly dominated by a handful of companies such as Unilever and Proctor & Gamble. Startups will not be able to reach that market anymore without the power of the established companies.
>>16868274>>16868274>Without patent rights independent of own production,The other round is that without patents nobody is able to block progress for decades. For consumer goods there are enough copyright protections anyway, and they lasting up to infinity while the basic tech. processes would be free.
>>16868763>block progress for decadesWhen did that ever happen?
If science was magic, and mathematics was like, the arcane language of magic, going off the D&D schools of wizardry, which field of science would belong to which school?For example>psychology = illusion and enchantment>geology = transmutation and abjuration>physics = evocation and conjuration
“Alien life exists elsewhere. The odds are just too good.”“But alien life visiting us? No. Impossible. It could never happen.”Are scientists just retarded?. “No you can’t come here. We’re off limits. No way no how. Cope.”It’s fucking weird. Do scientists not consider successor theories to our own limitations? Do they think our limitations are everyone else’s limitations?
>>16869324if somebody has the tech to break the laws of physics as you know them what makes you think you could even detect their presence if they didn't want to?what if aliens are here, but you can't see them, you can't touch them and you can't detect them in any way?
>>16869651Only inert space rocks. We could easily spot rockets being launched from all the way to Pluto. If any object in space was actually doing anything then it would be incredibly easy to notice. The issue with rocks is that they just aren't doing anything while aliens would be doing something which would make them easy to spot.
>>16870036Absolutely. They’d probably find it incredibly easy to hide extraordinary evidence to extraordinary claims. Humans arrogantly think we’d be able to detect them if they didn’t want to be detected. They could be beyond all our senses staying within higher dimensions for all we bloody well know.
>>16869358yet we get bested by metal tools, all it takes is for an alien to release a virus that makes humans engage in their deepest darkest desires, or overtake them with someone elses, it really is that easy human ego is unwarranted and i hope someone out there strikes it down like a whimpering ember
>>16870178>They could be beyond all our senses staying within higher dimensions for all we bloody well know.Looking at us inside and out, the perverts
who in their right mind would want to be a logician? this is next level autism
OP's head is going to explode when the slides get to Henkin sentences
Lewis Carroll's symbolic logic
>>16870240bait
>>16870240When you're doing philosophy research like me, it's easy to see allure of something objective and cumulative like formal logic instead of arguing about literally everything and getting nowhere while making others roll their eyes your work is useless (which is correct). And since you can switch to logic while working as analytic philospher quite easily, I definitely see a lot of people going this route. So philosphers choosing logic - understandable. As for mathematicians choosing logic instead of other branch of math (probably more useful and less dry) - no idea, but I guess it's a pretty niche option for them anyway.
>>16870720Some mathematicians just want to finish a project before they decide to kick the bucket and need the opportunity to work on logic to be able to do so.
