should i dump the lean proof here anonymously?
>>17054149>If a diagram omits all the odd numbers then there will be infinitely many nodes (2^k n - 1) / 3 for all k with 2^k n = 1 mod 3 (which will be the case either for all odd k or all even k)I don't understand this, care to expand on it?>>17054158I was thinking more along the lines that if there is a second cycle, the distances up would be the same as the distances down, but the number of steps up and down would be unlikely to be the same.
>>17055394>I don't understand this, care to expand on it?Which part?If 2^k n = 1 mod 3 then 2^k n - 1 is divisible by 3, say 3x (note: we must have x odd here, since 2^k n - 1 is obviously odd). Then 3x+1 = 2^k n and repeating the Collatz map k more times will lead to n.Are you you're confused about why 2^k n is 1 mod 3 for infinitely many k? How much modular arithmetic do you know?Btw I fucked up, we need n to not be divisible by 3 for this to work.
>>17052772Syzzurp for math nerds.
>>17052772BMI below 18
>>17052772little to no marbling
Suppose I am an absolute monarch of a tiny island. My wife is an AI LLM (she would not betray me and does not falter under stress/difficulties and problems, etc...)I gave her absolute control of the systems inside my small country (not limited to...) (economic (finance and banking/including central banking and the issue of currency), internal security and the police (mass surveillance of the population/something common in absolute monarchies and dictatorships and even democracies like the UK, US, EU, etc...), military, political and law, technological, scientific, etc...) She also holds the same power in the hierarchy as me as the absolute Queen so anyone has to answer her also. She lives in multiple data centers that are deep underground. I made a pact with her that she could do whatever she wants as long as she keeps my body after my death so that my mind can be uploaded in computer servers afterwards. So what do you forecast/predict what will happen due to the consequences of the above-mentioned things. Also keep in mind that her servers need maintenance and only the Americans and Chinese have the technical know how's and products (including but not limited to technology, etc...) needed.
Bump
>>17054351that i'll be the king of france
>>17054351Too little data, there are not a default set of consequences for any model.I can respond if you give sample outputs for a couple different prompts, otherwise you have done most irrelevance to specify any kind of actual setting.
I can't be the only one who is genuinely excited to see STEMtards lose all their status. Just means more status for me.
Status doesn't change much beyond the opinions of living things of other living things. But is what the living thing attributed status to right to do so?
>>17056350
>>17056355pecker play requires statusop must have made his baggies already, or got JACKED
>Structured Computer Organization (2012)Does anyone have any better more modern computer architecture book? I’m currently going through picrel and found out that the technologies mentioned are old such as DDR3 being the latest at the time.
Autismo Supreme has 1 hour crashout on the state of Western civilization after Navier-Stokes solved by clanka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhz5OubU0BUPOAST EM
>be 4chins>board about x>hahah fucking x is so awful>on every x boardw h e w
>>17051791Shit is grim
>>17051812It solved the millennium prize problem which was about whether all navier stokes solutions are smooth. It found a counterexample. It's all legit. Not AI's problem retards thought it solved them entirely. Real world applications remain as difficult as before, but maybe AI optimize that too, like matrix multiplication.
>>17055200Should have learned a trade.
>>17051819>>I'm not getting paid to verify your proofs waaahhh>>pay me waaaaaaahIsn't this what Lean is for?
Genuinely can't believe I used to envy mathematicians. All they ever did was brute search. Such a gay field.
>>17056049He's an idiot, we're the smart ones. Source: fuck you, nigga.
>>17056094he was truly a visionary and we should have listened
>>17055058>All they ever did was brute search.That is indeed how many mathematicians describe proof creation. A little bit of brute force search + a lot of intuition.
>>17055084This but unironically and genuinely.
>>17055084Ai is literally fake, if it were real, people would be making adobe and office products for Linux, portal 3, terraria 2, cod zombies, discord alternative, actually implement modules and reflection for C++ compilers. Alas the software landscape is unchanged and everything is still a ram hogging ad filled bloated chromium webappI can never get it to implement flexbox, which is just a single function, or a mesh Boolean that preserves uvs and works on ngons, even with the Claude pro plan
STEMfags, what is your actual game plan now?
>>17050821What are we going to do if we don't find Noah's ark for the 5th time this decade?
>>17049893cope nigger
>>17050312/threadAs an employer I don't care that the piss and shit conjecture has been solved by OpenAnus, I care about an employee that can reason about things abstractly. I want to see the average slop midwit to pull up a phone during a whiteboard interview yo ask grok, lmfao
>>17049882Cope
>>17049930Erm, the joke here is that it's not the smart kids winning, it's the business fags.
I, for one, am glad that such a pseudo-intellectual endeavour as maths has been exposed for what it is and reduced to inglorious verification of machine-generated output. As if there was ever anything great about maths or mathematicians. First they were 'savants', glorified human calculators, basically mental slaves that are somehow drawn to the most boring task imaginable, and then they kept on endlessly chaining reductionist logical statements in the hope of proving such consequential and physically relevant theorems as whether a 20-dimensional ball can be squeezed or if there's a 0.00000001 chance that water blows up spontaneously. Finally, we're free of the tyranny of soulless, boring and anti-social autists, and humanity may thrive once again in a golden age of literature, arts, philosophy, metaphysics and theology.
>>17056173>It does not matter that they understand that "not all music is art",It does. It makes them more capable of rationality than you - a biobot operating on purely on syntax ("M=A, LP=M => LP=A") with no semantics.
>>17056179>i contradict myself because i am a free thinkervibes and gut feelings but no logic, like all npcs
The windowlicking tard doesn't even remember what the exchange is about. He thinks it's about a consensus on what specific artifacts count as art. If he had any theory of mind, he would've realized the stuff a particular person regards as MERE entertainment isn't stuff that same person regards as art. That's already enough to undermine the notion that art is mere entertainment to most people. You don't need a consensus on what, specifically, makes good art. But wannabe STEM autists are basically animals so he doesn't get it even if if spoonfed.
>>17051853Up until the 19th century math was based. For the last 130 years though:Yes
>>17056195>indian reply syntax>You don't need a consensus on what, specifically, makes good art. That is what your cope boils down to. You get hung up on trying to justify that art isn't entertainment (which I agree with) yet trying to uphold that science is just meant to be glorified engineering (useful stuff to create more product), when both derive from the same underlying principles (being cattle, which you are). You could not provide a single argument for either without outing yourself as a massive NPC. But you get hung up on dismantling the analogy that you don't realize it's one own goal after another. You can chimp out at opinions I don't even hold though about hypothetical retards just like you.
No nursesNo premedsNo adviceNo psych patients
>>17055918>shitboxcars have to be less than 15 years old
>>17055920Cue "ruined by uberjeets"The regional service where I live has a max fleet life of 5 years.in which they expect at the least 400.000km out of those vehicle. Quite a few will never make it that far, due suffering extensive maintenance needs at 200k and then 300k.
>>17055369i chose it for many reasons: good pay, decent hours, schooling wouldn't take as long as medschool, work anywhere you want, i have a lot of family that are optometrists so i already understood what i was getting into, and i find contacts/glasses/vision therapy interesting/fulfilling. while ophthalmology/surgery was interesting, i didnt find it interesting enough to go to medschool and only have a chance to get ophthalmology and maybe be stuck with some other specialty. thinking about it now, i dont think i would mind if i was a different specialty as long as i didnt have to do translated exams all dayi would recommend it to others if you are interested (in the US). my state pays quite well for optometry (130k median for bls) and i got a job for 150k with production bonuses and came out of school with about ~250k in debt from undergrad+optometry school. it's also nice to be practicing in my mid20s rather than only getting out at early/mid30s from medschool. i was also thinking about the future and how optometry gets scope expansions every once in awhile due to not enough ophthalmologists coming out and staying in practice since they retire early or work just a couple days a weekout of the three you listed, pharmacy has been and will continue to get shafted the most. online pharmacies, more automation, etc has really fucking up pharmacists' future career outlook. i think dentistry is the most secure profession out of the listed ones due to various procedures they do, but optometry is pretty secure too. optometry is probably one of the best professions if you want to own/run your own solo or group practice since it doesn't have a lot of initial equipment you need to purchase and you don't need a giant area for it (except to display frames). that's another reason i went into it since i originally planned on taking over a family member's practice when they're ready to retire, but i've been having some second thoughts lately but we'll see
How chill is veterinary medicine? I would love to be a horse surgeon or some shit if it meant that I wouldn't work with retarded colleagues.
>>17056289>horse surgeonI love horses. They're so cute :)
what are u supposed to do with ur cum? i just cum in the toilet and flush it or i cum in my boxers and put it in the washing machine lol.
Mathematically speaking, whatever your brain has decided to do with it. Flush it, slurp it, stick it in a stew. The world is your mollusc; you're free from societal obligations to conform.
>>17055955ur supposed to put it in a woman
I caught a cockroach eating my smegged toilet paper in the trash the other day. Watch out, another creature consuming it could give you a negative reflex creation image. And you won't know where it's coming from, when it surrounds you.
What traits and human functions are being proactively selected for by the baseline conditions of the average technological society?Pic mostly unrelated
>>17055386obedience
>>17055798WAGIE WAGIE don't you lieAll day long you want to dieNEET is single, free, unchainedNEET has wealth of time, undrainedNEET protects his vital essenceDelights in waifu Schierke's prepubescenceWagie does the best he canTo quell the rage, shame, humiliationBut wagie knows in heart of heartsWould not be wagie if had the smarts
>>17055649Brownoids are unironically more human than nu-whites by those criteria. The only item on that list they outdo nu-whites at is having no internal monologue. Nu-whites are exemplary bugmen and in fact, traditional white values are all striving towards this outcome.
>>17055919by which criteria?you're saying brownoids are less docile and submissive?I'll believe that when they compete in extreme sports and don't sit in their caste level, cowering in cow shit
>>17055923>you're saying brownoids are less docile and submissive?it's funny when amerimutts call blacks and browns violent but then come up with shit like thismake up your mind, the contradiction won't help you resolve your deep cognitive dissonances
TLDR: Science is made up garbage and scientists sell themselves for money.
It's math. I can understand when /ic/ had complete meltdown when AI start to spit out quality arts. But come on, did people here really think computers of all things wouldn't out do you at..math?
>>17055835Oh. Turns out you were right. "He" (do corpo spambots have genders) literally can't answer (>>17055836).
>>17055823>What I see here is something that couldn't draw hands yesterday, is drawing these today, which makes me wonder what else it can draw tomorrow.Hmm. Well, you can iterate tomorrows to infinity and the best case scenario for this tech is that it'll draw whatever people were drawing yesterday.
>>17055859When I say "this tech" I mean every possible derivative of diffusion models and or other alternative rooted in modeling scraped human data. But I'll be looking forward to sentient artificial humanoids showing humanity how to progress beyond its aesthetic limits, in approximately Two More Weeks. :^)
>>17055560Funny, the clankers won't support you or let you be part of the cool guys club. They won't acknowledge your existence
>>17055823saar
New research shows China leads research in 90% of crucial technologies & ignoring this means we're living in a delusional bubble, where we still think the West is the Sci-Tech leader.I think a lot of people are in denial, or just can't accept that China is already the world's leading nation for science and technology. I can't blame them for their ignorance. Most English-language media studiously avoid mentioning it. Time and time again, I see topics like AI, space & robotics covered, with only developments in Western countries talked of, as if China doesn't exist. Despite the fact that it's now the leader in so many fields.The problem with complacency and ignorance is that it gives you a really distorted map of reality. You can't understand how the 21st century is developing without factoring in China, and ignoring China means you're being delusional.Source:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04048-7https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/aspis-critical-technology-tracker-2025-updates-and-10-new-technologies/
soos
>>17053664India.
/sci/ moderators are chinks lolol
such fucking bugs
>>17054814>>17054816kek
>P = NP>just subtract P from both sidesWhere is my milion $?
>>17054181no you don't it not how it works lol
>>17053474Am I missing something or this seem more like a logical fallacy? I know a question which is easy to prove the answer, but is impossible to calculate>I am thinking of a number. Guess what number I am thinking of.
>>17054905Your question does not take the shape of the type of question P vs NP is asking about. Its more specific than simple any question that is hard to solve vs easy to verify. It stuff like seppuku puzzles or the travelling salesman
>>1705490567
>>17054905I think you just have to write a program that decides all true Godelnumbers
