[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / out / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

02/28/15Janitor applications are now being accepted for the next ~48 hours.
01/26/15News Post: In Memoriam
01/23/15moot's final 4chan Q&A has been posted here.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1187770908945.jpg (61 KB, 1000x508)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
Go /p/ro:
• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side.
• Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.

Want:
• We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text.
• "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking
• Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos.
• Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged.
• Use the catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads)

Do Not Want:
• Go to >>>/r/ for specific Photoshop requests.
• Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: p_recent.png (6 KB, 500x500)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
last one hit bump limit
>>2546362
284 replies and 150 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2550701
Not bad, but I don't feel like it's very dynamic. A bit closer, perhaps, to make the tower look more looming and taller.
>>
>>2550701
I dig it
>>
>>2550701

Some not-so-subtle phallic imagery here.
>>
>>2550587
No light source!
>>2550595
Thanks, I'm glad you got that vibe, I was definitely going for that kind of feel. Yeah I prefer it without the face, but everyone that's posted said they wish they could see more of the face so I guess I'm wrong on this one haha
>>
>>2550587
Oh woops I just realized the confusion. The comment was directed towards the dog picture that was linked in the post

File: nicebruh.jpg (5 KB, 251x201)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
ok /p/ let's show your film dslr scanners and how shitty they scan. pls
posting scanner and a few scans.
it's fucking ghetto.

my phones dead will post scanner pics when it's alive.
176 replies and 77 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2550093
great scan. what film and format is that?
>>
>>2550212
TMX...35mm
Maxxum 35-105 3.5-4.5
>>
File: _SAW9800.jpg (1.18 MB, 1600x1280)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG
Just some ducks on Provia 400x

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800E
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows)
PhotographerShane W
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern822
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:01:23 20:41:14
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/2.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFlash
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length105.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2550212
How many stitches for that photo?
>>
File: fuji200.jpg (1.38 MB, 1800x1172)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB JPG
>>2550703
Three, I think. But I came to realize that the only reason you would multi-shot a frame of 35mm is if you plan to print very large and you don't want to up rez. For regular use single shot 35 is plenty...especially now that I have 24 megapickles rather than the 14 from the nx100 in these shots.

Here's a single shot dog on fuji 200.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelNX100
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Color Filter Array Pattern440
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:03:27 21:25:31
Exposure Time1/20 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
Color Space InformationsRGB
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard

Canonfags get REKT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6FnKgVjPpM
66 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2550395
It's not his work as much as his charming personality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjnvY2PjsFE
>>
>>2549468
>>2549570
>>2549792
OK, K-3 came today, and first impressions are: it' a brick. With battery grip and lens this thing is hefty, which I was expecting, but it's actually kind of small compared to other cameras in it's class, so the weight is deceptive.
And Holy Fuck this lens is LOUD. Anybody with experience with the 50/1.8 verify this. This sucker sounds like an old Bluebird school bus trying to grind into 3rd gear. If this is what they mean by Pentax lenses sounding like "happy robots" I'd hate to hear what an angry robot sounds like.

Also, I have kind of small hands, and my fingers fall exactly where they need to on this camera.
All in all first impressions are positive.
>>
>>2550667
The lower end lenses use the camera driven focus which is loud. The higher tier lenses have silent drives. Like the 18-135 is quick and silent.

You happy with it? I love mine.
>>
>>2550680
Literally had it for 90 minutes.
But it fits in the hand well, it feels right, and HUGE viewfinder compared to the little SL1 I was using for street. Gonna spend the weekend playing with it.
>>
>>2550667
should have went for sony a7.
my condolence.

File: canonstrap.jpg (18 KB, 500x344)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
Hey /p/

What camera strap do you use?

I used to use this strap when I was running my DSLR, but now that I'm in the mirrorless game, I'm looking for something smaller, and more aesthetically appealing.
50 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2545926
Disgusting
>>
File: clarkson.jpg (125 KB, 679x741)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>>2550297
Did you expect perfection? I hand-sewed it having never sewn in a decade before.
>>
>>2544750
God that thing is fucking terrible.
>>
>>2548596
i'm getting an old AF tampon 28-200mm for my eos m.
$30 of shit?
>>
File: 1405578356388.png (254 KB, 497x425)
254 KB
254 KB PNG
>>2550724

>tampon

File: PRYMAX_COLOR_200.resize.jpg (403 KB, 1000x667)
403 KB
403 KB JPG
General film thread.

Also my personal question, did anybody heard about this brand of film? reviews? opinions? I searched in the internets but did not found anything intresting. pic related, it's name is "prymax color".

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.1
Serial Number-186353207
Lens NameEF50mm f/1.8 II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:03:04 12:28:46
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height667
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeAv-Priority
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeCenter-Weighted
ISO Speed RatingAuto
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeAI Focus
Drive ModeUnknown
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed224
Color Matrix129
215 replies and 36 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2548123

Ayya check your fucking email FFS
>>
>>2550258
>Trolling this hard for some trapcock.
>>
File: _3260041.jpg (215 KB, 1024x768)
215 KB
215 KB JPG
Delicious pano slides!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Color Filter Array Pattern842
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:03:27 06:49:37
Exposure Time1/25 sec
F-Numberf/4.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/4.6
Exposure Bias0.7 EV
Subject Distance0.35 m
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length20.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1024
Image Height768
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
Guise I just tried shooting and developing a roll of Tri-X that expired in 1983. I was expecting it to come out pretty crap, but I got no images at all, just a medium density fog across the whole thing. Leader did turn fully dark. Is it common to get absolutely nothing out of film this old?
>>
>>2550719
no, you fucked up, it should've been relatively fine.

File: extension-tubes.jpg (260 KB, 1322x900)
260 KB
260 KB JPG
Hey /p/

New to Macro photography. Looking for some conceptual info. I've looked around, but haven't been able to find the answer to this question:

What's the relationship from minimum focusing distance to flange distance? As the lens gets further from the film plane, I understand the minimum focusing distance becomes shorter, but is it linear, or what?

Also, what if the lens is at infinity, how does that focusing distance change with extension tubes?

Also general macro or closer-than-normal-focus thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeKodak
Camera ModelDCS Pro SLR/n
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS Windows
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern1090
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2005:05:28 08:53:21
Exposure Time1/90 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness5.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeMulti Spot
Light SourceDaylight
Focal Length120.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1322
Image Height900
Exposure Index160
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: macrobar.jpg (37 KB, 588x165)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>but is it linear, or what?
It depends by the lens. Macro lenses has charts that specify magnification reachable with extension tubes.
>Also, what if the lens is at infinity, how does that focusing distance change with extension tubes?
You lose infinity, and at infinity the lens focuses at some distance (like 1m for example). The entire focusing range of the lens shifts closer.

This said, if you use extension tubes with non macro lenses or outside the maximun rating for a macro lens, you generally obtain shit quality.
>>
>>2550662
Thanks for the info.

How about focal length? With wide-angle lenses, is it easier to get super close focus? Is it easier to get mid-range focus with longer lenses?
>>
>>2550668
You want to be at at least 50mm when doing any kind of macro. Wide angle focal length requires placing the camera very close to your subject. Very close meaning you bump in to subject with the lens accidentally if not paying attention.

Focusing just in general will be more difficult with tubes because your depth of field will be tiny. Macro on stationary objects is generally done with tripod, small aperture, and long shutter time to get more of the object in focus.

And yeah quality with regular lens + tubes is not going to be as nice as dedicated macro lens. However, you can use tubes in addition to a macro lens, so it's not a waste of money to buy them to test the macro waters some before buying the real lens for it.
>>
>>2550668
the amount of extension you need is proportional to the focal length
so very short extension on a wide angle will get you focus on something touching the lens, and a foot might not be enough for that on a big telephoto
>>
get a canon fd 50mm f3.5 macro and lolympus m4/3.
that's 1:1 macro at 100mm equivalent with ibis.

I just started a flickr today and am looking for critiques and/or people to follow. I'd love to have someone check out my pictures and check other anons' pictures. (also didn't see a flickr gen in the catalog, only selfish "check out my shit" threads.
32 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Why not

https://www.flickr.com/photos/23132058@N04/
>>
File: DiscoveryGreen.jpg (844 KB, 1000x800)
844 KB
844 KB JPG
>>2550589
I'm not a super big fan of the PP on the most recent shots and the collection seems sort of indiscriminate. There are some decent shots mixed in with shots that are sort of repeated and lots of regular photos of friends I assume.

I enjoy some of your earlier landscapes and I love Lisbon but maybe in the future discriminate more. Consider looking at people who take photos like you do and see what they are doing that you like and try to incorporate it into your stuff going forward.

>>2550538
I like the processing on your recent stuff and I am a fan of the abstract ice photos.

>>2550455
I really like your interpretation of the Golden Gate Bridge and your shots of buildings. They are sort of wide but they still feel like detail shots.

I don't have much but I'd appreciate any critique.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/91335629@N02/


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>2550589
>>2550682
Post production? Lol no, that's the result of a nearly expired film, plus an airport scanner plus a 15 years old scanner, it's the best result with the cheapest thing I could have, I uploaded all the acceptable shots (consider those shots are old)
>>
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dipluridae/
>>
i'm starting.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/130568212@N07/

i got an old canon F1 with 28,50 and 70-200mm.

File: DSC_0016.jpg (775 KB, 2500x1660)
775 KB
775 KB JPG
-

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
22 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: FollowDaRules!.jpg (1.42 MB, 1296x1943)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG
>>2550033
nothing worse than borderline rule of thirds

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1660
Image Height2500
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:03:27 16:12:10
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1296
Image Height1943
>>
>>2550661
well i guess in the original golden spiral goes straight to his dick. i'm guessing that means something
>>
>>2550663
>the original golden spiral goes straight to his dick

...awesome.
>>
Nice pics, especially the first one. Guessing Scotland?
>>
really great shot, what did you use ?

File: Capture.png (10 KB, 919x766)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
Sorry for the wait, family issues & work.

Here's the final version with corrected names and some picture changes (mainly just 1 photo that is different and the rest are resolution based).
I can't get the pdf without the blurb watermark because I made the book using the blurb software, so it's $4.95 to get the book in pdf form.
Maybe someone can be generous enough to buy it and post it for download.

Here's pricing proof:
http://i1.minus.com/iCDSBSjc0wepv.PNG

Book link:
http://www.blurb.com/b/6074398-p-2014

Well yeah, awesome pictures everyone and thanks for partcipating.
Looking forward to next year's book ;)


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
56 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
xo
>>
>tfw couldn't make it this year because I barely shot due to my third world country conditions

Hope I can comeback next time, excelent job guys
>>
>>2550699
suddenly a wild pedro appears !
>>
>>2550711
I was in the 2013 edition of the book, I don't post often because I can barely shoot ;_;
>>
Whoever Michael is, that landscape shot is legit.

File: IMG_5954.jpg (591 KB, 1000x667)
591 KB
591 KB JPG
live music / concert / whatever the fuck you wanna call it thread

i'll start, took photos of king khan & bbq show, cool duo where both guys play guitar and sing while another plays drums with his feet.

gonna shoot anamanaguchi, swans, turnstile, and new found glory in the next week.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:03:24 03:30:29
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length17.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
23 replies and 12 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>tfw i get approved for a festival but it turns out it's just media passes and not photo
going for free is tite but i wanna take photos goddammit

>>2550592
i'm honestly not a huge fan of when this happens. makes the shot look weird most of the time. it works every now and then though.
>>
>>2550696
Obviously they're only going to let those with assignments in the pit.
>>
>>2550704
i shoot for a publication so yeah, the email is unclear so i asked if we're getting photo too because that's what matters most.
>>
>>2550712
Is this your first job or something? If they gave you a "media pass," that means you can bring your camera.
>>
>>2550713
this is my first music festival that isn't warped tour and that was three years ago when i was in high school.

all other shows i shoot have the reviewer as "media" and me as "photo" but i wanna believe you're right

File: PicsArt_1427498364353.jpg (148 KB, 800x644)
148 KB
148 KB JPG
It is my first time here. I just want to kmow how i am doing it. Thank you for ur rating

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2015:03:27 19:19:27
Image Height644
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width800
Light SourceUnknown
Metering ModeUnknown
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Bullshit!
>>
anyone with a babbys first dslr can snapshit a bird at the beach on a cloudy day. no need to watermark it. no one is going to sell this shit and make a single penny off it.
>>
>>2550669
Ah-ah-ah. People are stupid, don't forget.

Put this in a glued together frame for 5 bucks at the Shore, and you've got yourself a tourist trap.

Otherwise, yeah, it's a good picture. I agree, it could probably be in a bit more of a horizontal or tighter crop. Good rule of thirds work, though.

7/10, you saw a bird
>>
Shitty camera: $200
Bad photography skills: $0
Having an ocean in your studio: Priceless
>>
File: 1427498495979aa.jpg (314 KB, 800x644)
314 KB
314 KB JPG
Pretty good image OP, gonna start selling it on my site, thanks

File: video general 26.png (267 KB, 600x600)
267 KB
267 KB PNG
Look here before asking gear questions:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PPbPpOD-qg2gpzb1fTQsHhCRJ_PhMYUHub0jmZqw--M

Archived Threads: https://fgts.jp/p/search/subject/video%20general/
117 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2550564
strech it sideways or downres the short side, its basically the same thing, but its definitively not cropping
>>
>>2550564
LOL
>>
>>2550382
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl_4HcpOCJk

i used a t3i and a sigma 18-250
>>2550545
>>2550552
>>2550618
o-oh
>>
>>2550693
looks pretty decent
other than the h264 softness

what picture style setting do you use?
turning down the sharpness and contrast on my eos m + adding some sharpening and some other stuff in post works well for me
>>
>>2550705
i use cinestyle with the contrast and sharpness way down

File: newspaper-photography.jpg (53 KB, 400x400)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
Or news agency?
8 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2550385
Not a great shot but decent in a set I suppose.
>>
I used to shot for a paper. Now I freelance again since third world press, while exiting sometimes, is really precarious economicaly.
>>
>>2550561
Third world?
>>
File: Batmobile again-1.jpg (698 KB, 1000x664)
698 KB
698 KB JPG
>>2550469
The set wasn't too great either, if I'm honest, but I appreciate the input. I'd like to think I've gotten a bit better since then.

Nevertheless, I think the moral of the story as it relates to the thread is that newpaper photography sometimes leads you to take some pictures of some strange stuff.

>>pic related again: Another bad photo of the full car

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern738
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
Image Created2015:03:27 16:35:59
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length20.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2550586
I would fire you if you sent back this dog shit

File: pirates.jpg (430 KB, 1920x1080)
430 KB
430 KB JPG
Why does more contrast make everything look better?
23 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: rum.jpg (314 KB, 1920x1080)
314 KB
314 KB JPG
>>2550629
That one's much better, yeah. I think I'll use it for wallpaper, thanks!

Here is another one if someone wants to get creative.
>>
File: HDR.jpg (1.42 MB, 1920x1080)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG
FUCK CONTRAST!

GO HDR!!!!!!!!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1920
Image Height1080
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:03:27 23:07:09
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height1080
>>
>>2550637
It looks really weird
>>
host and post the raw files for these images OP.
>>
>>2550671
Took those with my phone so I don't have raw files. I can post full size resolution versions if you want.


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.