[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1187770908945(l).jpg (95 KB, 1600x813)
95 KB JPG
Go /p/ro.

Want:
• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.
• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text.
• Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos.
• Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged.
• Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread.

Do Not Want:
• Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests.
• Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads.

Want to learn more?
The /p/ Wiki

File: IMG_1327.jpg (410 KB, 1362x2400)
410 KB JPG
as a beginner, should i buy a 55-250mm lens or a 50mm lens? i dont know specifically what i want to shoot yet.
15 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4525248
18-55 /120 /200
>>
The 55-250mm is useless indoors
>>
>>4525252
Ah yes, I expected to find your miserable ass here complaining whenever someone makes a new thread in an otherwise dead board.
Consider non-existence, faggot.
>>
>>4525578
I'm flattered you care so much you think you recognize me but I've no idea who you are
>>
>>4525582
Take your meds, Clive

File: s-l1200.jpg (390 KB, 1200x1200)
390 KB JPG
Only A Gameboy Camera Is Good Enough™

Previously: >>4524132
155 replies and 34 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1788189278133.jpg (241 KB, 1600x1600)
241 KB JPG
>>4525021
pic. though buying something that expensive in the first place is retarded.

>>4525432
it doesn't matter that much, depending on what you want to do.
if you normalize by dof, all sensor sizes are the same in low light.
>>
>>4525537
Skill issue.
>>
>>4525520
Cheers, man. Waterjet and 5-axis mill. Only needed to use 2 axes though, obviously.

>>4525537
You could use a shaper, even an oldschool one. Cut the square on a table saw. Would only need to make one jig since the piece is the same 3 moves repeated. Just rotate the workpiece 3 times after the initial cut. Probably 2 total passes though, one for removing most of the material and a second one for the inside corners. The radius is only 1mm, I wouldn't do that in one pass.
>>
>>4525570
It could be done sure, hell it could be made on a lathe, but no one would do it unless it was literally the only machine they had. It's a stretch to assume that anyone has a shaper never mind it being their only machine, people only have them these days as a curiosity when they already have more appropriate stuff.
>>
>>4525537
You're trying too hard anon.

does he still hold up in 2026?
>>
>thoughts
Pray for the conversion of the Jews.
>>
is he an actual respected photographer or just a youtuber e-celeb? Watched some review of his and had to turn it off cause I found him incredibly annoying even for a youtuber
>>
>>4523841
Where does he live now? NYC?
>>
>>4523841
He mogs jpeggers
>>
I had to unsubscribe when he used the Holocaust as an example of something factual. That was the point he stopped being somebody I would listen to and instead became just another Jew.

how do we actually feel about these after all these years
5 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4525552
photography peaked with digital
>>
>>4525552
My local dev shop recycles or returns the cameras so maybe that happens more often than not?

Unfortunately to reuse the disposable you have to carefully unwind the entire film roll so you’ll probably fuck it up by hand.
>>
>>
Weird that OP apparently used GenAI to make a stock image of a disposable camera (among other AI images ITT)
>>
>>4525575
why is that weird?

File: IMG_6354.jpg (771 KB, 1170x1098)
771 KB JPG
>The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust has raised concerns over what it describes as the unauthorised use of Ansel Adams’s name and work in an “AI-generated colour version” of his iconic photograph shot in 1942 Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico, which was recently exhibited and offered for sale at a major international photography fair.
>In a statement, the Trust said the work “exploited Ansel’s name, reputation, and his most iconic image, while failing to identify any human artist responsible for its creation. The Trust did not authorise, endorse, consent to, or acquiesce in the ‘AI-generated colour version’ of ‘Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico’ exhibited and offered for sale by Danziger Gallery at The Photography Show presented by AIPAD in April. The Trust was not consulted or notified before the work appeared. Once alerted, we reached out to James Danziger in real time, notifying him of the Trust’s rights, and asking for the work to be removed. Correspondence shared with the Trust shows that, despite our formal notice, Mr. Danziger subsequently leveraged Ansel’s name, ‘Moonrise,’ and the AIPAD presentation while pursuing a proposed commercial AI colourisation venture involving other artists’ estates.”
>James Danziger made a response on the Danziger website to Ansel Adams Trust's condemnation by not only mentioning that the image is technically in the public domain, but also wrote: "As for the print itself, while A.I. served as the starting point, the final image involved extensive human intervention, editing, proofing, and refinement over many months."
18 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4519262
>>4519274
I’ve recently started giving my color photos a little chroma bump
I tell myself it’s because I’m moving away from a real-light purist and learning slightly idealized reality looks better
but I have a nagging suspicion it’s just the age-related color sensitivity loss kicking in
>>
>>4519286
what, that's a thing??
>>
>>4519288
yes
60-70yo boomers lose color sensitivity, low light vision, and visual dynamic range over time until they see in micro four thirds and think the shots from their $2000 om3 look exactly like real life with lovely realistic colors and more detail than was there to begin with

from birth to your 60s you see in phase one iq180 vision

remember this, and that there are old fucks on 4chan. they just stopped acting any different around 25-30.
>>
>>4512863
>optical prints
Why would this justify the price tag?
>>
>>4513673
You'll get it in a few years.

File: DSC_0107_es.jpg (1.73 MB, 3000x2000)
1.73 MB JPG
A picture with the Moon making the image interesting - can be just the Moon, or the Moon just being pretty with foreground objects or stars and planets, new or old, but OC.
See finder image (next post) for exif.
12 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4525531
420-800 lens
@800
f16
ss 1/500
iso 800

>took like 750 pics and 200 dark biased but as far as i can tell even zoomed at 800% cant find any visible difference
*in the staked end pic

also fuck 4chin for resetting the cookies or some bs i need again to solve 4 bs captchas even after multiple email verifications
>>
File: DSC04816-2.jpg (1.43 MB, 6192x4128)
1.43 MB JPG
>>4525447
my bad, sept 2025 eclipse
f8
ss 0.4s
iso 1600
sooc jpg
attached exported at 75% iq in lrc so i can uploaded
>>
File: DSC04836-2.jpg (1.18 MB, 6192x4128)
1.18 MB JPG
>>4525534
anotr one from same night after the eclipse when the moon started getting illuminated again
f 7.1
1s
iso 320
>>
Shot this an hour ago using a 400mm lens I bought from Cash Converters for a few bucks. 100 light frames + 40 dark, 20 flat, 20 flat dark.

400mm, f22, ISO 100, 1/6 sec, Sony a7iii.
>>
File: DSC07354.jpg (1.54 MB, 4128x6192)
1.54 MB JPG

File: DSC03902.jpg (951 KB, 1938x1289)
951 KB JPG
Dusk encounter edition
40 replies and 33 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSC05665.jpg (1.69 MB, 4128x4128)
1.69 MB JPG
does big white cock count?
>>
File: DSC08830.jpg (1.84 MB, 6192x4128)
1.84 MB JPG
>>
File: DSC05578.jpg (221 KB, 869x830)
221 KB JPG
heavy crop and almost blending into the background but shot at golden hour and this bird has almost same colour as the ground. skittish as hell saw plenty af them this one the only one that i managed to capture relatively sharp and in focus
>>
File: O8304532_b.jpg (2.14 MB, 2614x3405)
2.14 MB JPG
another duck
>>
File: Birdbath.jpg (1.32 MB, 2560x1440)
1.32 MB JPG
I know my photography isn't great, but I had share the kick I get from watching sparrows' enthusiasm in the birdbath (a glazed pot saucer)

File: IMGP0662.jpg (2.17 MB, 2304x1728)
2.17 MB JPG
Soft Edition
The aim of this thread is to discuss compact digital cameras (digishits) and share photos from them.
If your digishit has a "soft" picture mode, take some photos with it and share them in this thread. Feel free to share your digishit photos taken in any other picture mode, too.
Previous Thread: >>4477534
71 replies and 65 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: f124016207.jpg (449 KB, 2487x1865)
449 KB JPG
This pic was taken with a Canon Powershot G5 in 2004
>>
File: IMG_9123.jpg (1.31 MB, 2592x1944)
1.31 MB JPG
>>4522721
I had the opportunity take the exact* same camera to the exact same place last month. Beautiful idea, but trees grow a lot in 24 years.
*Mostly the same camera, had to transplant the top controls assembly from another G5 with a stuck shutter I bought for parts
>>
>>4506479
Is this the designated sony thread?
>>
>>4522721
>post soviet city
>old digicam
>old picture
SOVL
>>
File: file.png (833 KB, 853x480)
833 KB PNG

File: DSCF7731 upright full.jpg (3.03 MB, 3860x5791)
3.03 MB JPG
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit.

Last thread: >>4433352
188 replies and 124 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4525113
Laowa makes some crazy ones
>>
>>
>>
>>

Theme: Night Lights

Let`s keep it limited to artificial lights for this month.
All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots.
Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged!

Previous thread:>>4515121
>Go highlight your choice of best pics!
28 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: mangrove.jpg (85 KB, 960x1280)
85 KB JPG
>>
This thread ends in a few days so get your shots in
>>
File: IMG_1984.jpg (756 KB, 1800x1201)
756 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: 20260825_215746.jpg (2.13 MB, 4000x3000)
2.13 MB JPG

File: 97065645434233213.jpg (2.73 MB, 6000x4000)
2.73 MB JPG
5 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4514799
why?
>>
>>4520492
Nta, but he asked because your sky is exposed nicely and your foreground (60% of your image) is simply underexposed.
Don't get me wrong, it's not *that* bad because dark things should look dark, but even a mild bracket of 1 stop would have made the foreground actually viewable.
>>
>>4520499
>everything has to be exposed the correct way
>>
>>4513250
This
Although some of my best pictures were taken at sunrise desu
>>
File: Mud Stairs.jpg (1.8 MB, 2187x3888)
1.8 MB JPG
>>4512395
I went out in the morning rain two days ago, saturday, snapped some pictures and picked wild raspberries for my grandma. Very nice chilled temperatures and strong wind, I am so done with summer, I don't do well in heat or strong sunshine.

I also got photoshop two days ago, I know that the picture is probably horrendous on so many levels, but I like it so maybe someone else will.

File: DSC_5909.jpg (3.55 MB, 3845x2559)
3.55 MB JPG
rate my film snapshits from my Vietnam trip

shot on a Ricoh GR1
125 replies and 116 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Great thread!
lot's of soul in here
They do translate as mostly random travel snapshits and I think you could gain from setting up some sort of focus or goal on your next trip, but these already are better and tell more of a story than most shit on here
>>
>>4518205
>>4518220
>>4518249
>>4518255
These ones stood out. Do more like these, less like the others. Also, please curate your work better - there are a lot of lazy shots here. It's obvious you are not thinking much before hitting the shutter.
>>
How was the weather any Vietnam? Any concerns about getting fungus and excess moisture in the camera? I've heard tropical and humid countries are hell on gear.
>>
>>4518201
Great thread, anon, I enjoyed it.
>>
>>4518291
This is good

File: 2398507234985723069845.png (187 KB, 293x321)
187 KB PNG
>on the hunt for an ff lens equivalent of xf 18mm 1.4
>canon charges 3k, lets try nikon
>good lenses, crap bodies. lets try soney
>bodies look promising.mp4
>viltrox or sony 20mm... kind of
>viltrox 26 2.8 is the closest.
>2.8
>ff

guess i dont need a fucking camera
6 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Thypoch 28mm f1.4
>hunt for an ff lens equivalent of xf 18mm
>bodies bodies bodies
Do you want a lens or a system you dumb freak
>>
>>4524709
I don't think anon knows either.
>>
>>4524732
>>4524709
He already has the exact lens he wants which is the XF 18mm that goes on a Fuji X body.
I think he is trolling
>>
>>4524354
I love this big brain schizo nigga
>>
>>4524360
The 35mm f/1.4 is fucking glacially slow and noisy but it makes my dick tingle in a very similar way to my 50mm Summicron

File: mdf.png (1.18 MB, 988x878)
1.18 MB PNG
Insta and whatever else thread for wherever anons post their photos.

https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/

Do any of you tend to go for certain themes and styles? Or just try anything?
167 replies and 28 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4497553
>https://deadpangraveyard.net/
i love the web 1.0 feel
>>
>>4525281
nice referral link, shlomo.
>>
File: file.png (890 KB, 619x907)
890 KB PNG
>>4496839
https://www.instagram.com/horgen_foto/

Mostly just wedding photography, stage shows and travel photos.
>>
>>4496969
This simply isn't the case.
It's the Instagram algorithm. I basically ONLY follow other photographers, and yet I basically NEVER see any of their posts pop up, even though I like them every single time.
Also, the algorithm will ONLY show me reels (videos), not pictures.
It's also impossible to search for anything that doesn't already have a million views. It's completely impossible to find smaller accounts.
The whole thing is broken and useless.
>>
>>4525471
I honestly expects attempts in near future of making new social network sites dedicated to photography or revival of old ones. IG got completely broken, as you said, by "influencers" and algorithms. I, too, when opening main page on web browser, see maybe one or two posts from people I have in observed and everything below is "sponsored" content, "what might interest you" and other completely unrelated stuff.

Fun little thing - last weekend, at anime con, I ran into booth of fan project of such site, aimed at both cosplayers and photographers, guys here specifically mentioned IG problems as one of inspirations and that they already had some interest from abroad. So IG frustration is real and I hope it will only grow.


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.