[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
05/08/16Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!
04/28/16New trial board added: /qst/ - Quests
[Hide] [Show All]


Voting open for the 4chan Banner Contest! See the contest page for details.

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1187770908945.jpg (61 KB, 1000x508)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
Go /p/ro:
• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side.
• Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.

Want:
• We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text.
• "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking
• Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos.
• Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged.
• Use the catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads)

Do Not Want:
• Go to >>>/r/ for specific Photoshop requests.
• Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: BayOfMoons1.jpg (2.17 MB, 2890x1809)
2.17 MB
2.17 MB JPG
Last one reached image limit
Comment Critique etc.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3300
Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern4966
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:09:20 17:55:01
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
12 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: _PNT8960.jpg (577 KB, 680x1200)
577 KB
577 KB JPG
>>2936483
Last one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-3
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)67 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:09:28 21:54:04
Exposure Time1/6000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length45.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
File: IMG_6675.jpg (343 KB, 1000x623)
343 KB
343 KB JPG
I went to the aquarium and came back with a handful of images I think are nice, critique would be appreciated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
>>
File: IMG_6680.jpg (660 KB, 667x1000)
660 KB
660 KB JPG
>>2936485

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
>>
File: IMG_6686.jpg (507 KB, 667x1000)
507 KB
507 KB JPG
>>2936486

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
>>
File: IMG_6694.jpg (671 KB, 667x1000)
671 KB
671 KB JPG
>>2936487

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi

File: nuts.jpg (354 KB, 1600x722)
354 KB
354 KB JPG
This is the Film General Thread, aka FGT.

>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot Kodak TMAX.

This is the place to post your film photos, without flushing them down the Recent Photo Toilet.
It's OK to ask about film gear in this thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
301 replies and 109 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2935363
What is the deal with the Rodinal stand meme?
>>
>>2936128

dont reply to me you aids ridden cocksucker. give suggestions when you can get a shot thats not blurred or out of focus lomo trash, faggot.
>>
File: 42jKW7w.jpg (648 KB, 667x1000)
648 KB
648 KB JPG
>>2936357
you shure told'em, billy!
>>
>>2936256

It's godly. You should try it.
>>
>>2936256
Do some searching on APUG and find the folks the actually PROPER comparison testing of stand vs. normal. Test after comparison test done with proper densitometers shows that there is very little benefit to stand developing and very real possibilities of fucking up your film (bromide drag and such). Anyone that throws up a pic and tells you it was stand developed and its godly, does not have a side by side with an identical negative developed by standard procedure. If you want to experiment with a roll of snapshits, by all means give it a try. But if you think you have keepers on the roll, do yourself a favor and develop by manufacturers recommendation.

Why is this fucker famous? All his photos are basic as fuck and shit.
6 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2936454
Yes. He's average at everything but since he knew the right people he became a big deal
>>
He's boring to me
>>
>>2936451
>>2936456

t. jelly.
>>
>>2936454
Welcome to the real world.
>>
>>2936451
>ask someone
>name ONE famous photographer
>Terry Richardson
Terry Richardson? Who's he?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_Yo3FRPeQw

File: DSC_4262_4chan.jpg (137 KB, 1000x671)
137 KB
137 KB JPG
old thread hit image limit >>2931740

post your recent pictures here

1/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3100
Camera SoftwareCapture NX 2.4.3 W
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern12091
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:09:25 11:09:14
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length90.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height671
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
229 replies and 144 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: _SDI0793rs2.jpg (644 KB, 1200x800)
644 KB
644 KB JPG
>>2936112
>nearest neighbour resizing
oops

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSIGMA
Camera ModelSIGMA DP3 Merrill
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4704
Image Height3136
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:09:29 14:45:25
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1200
Image Height800
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID3030363039333537CEFAEB5732334234
>>
newbie here, please point out what's wrong with this picture
>>
>>2936161

Bring the camera in lower and closer to the cat so you're on level with their eyes. Try not to get so much of the background.
>>
>>2934480
>>2934475
>>2934472
Use a smaller aperture, you can obviously control the lighting of these so there's no reason to have such shallow DoF.

Your camera is also too high which allows us to see where the floor and wall meet, especially noticeable in the black and white.

You missed focus in the first one.
>>
>>2936161

Seems underexposed too, like flat. Was it cloudy or something?

Try at different times of the day for better lighting. Good photographers don't just take snapshots they make shots.

File: image.jpg (68 KB, 300x400)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
Where can you get Kodachrome developed?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width300
Image Height400
39 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2934225
Do you realize the difference between "trade secret" and plain secret?
>>
>>2934125
this pic is spoopy
why is the light on the roof not lining up with the table lamp?
>>
>>2934559
Yes I do. I also realize that the only trade secrets involved here are the processes used to manufacture the film, not the chemistry, and even those are protected by patents. Just because something is complicated and not well known does not mean it's a "trade secret".
>>
>>2934439
Impossible can't use the Polaroid process because the materials and supply chain Polaroid used was destroyed with the company's exit from the industry. When Polaroid shut down, those materials were also discontinued for environmental reasons - the chemistry was only still in production under grandfather clauses.

I'm not sure where Fuji and Polaroid stand regarding Instax, etc.(fuck, Polaroid has their own, rebranded version of the Instax Mini camera and film) - however I do recall Polaroid licensed their packfilm patents to Fuji back in the early-90s. The big lawsuit you're thinking of was actually with Kodak in the mid-80s, which Polaroid won and forced Kodak out of the instant business.
>>
File: image.jpg (42 KB, 480x358)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
OK, so I kinda feel retarded because I was asking where I can get kodachrome developed in b/w, not color. Also, what modern film looks the most like Kodachrome 64?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width480
Image Height358

File: image.jpg (189 KB, 825x618)
189 KB
189 KB JPG
Hey guys, so I'm broke as fuck but I'm trying to figure out creative ways to make money so that I can buy myself a proper DSLR for video purposes. Currently I am in school and thus I can't make much from a job due to lack of hours- my question is if you guys have any luck selling photographs anywhere?

Have you tried selling them on etsy or on stock image websites? Is there any money in it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width825
Image Height618

File: FramingBad.png (685 KB, 1296x432)
685 KB
685 KB PNG
hi /p/haggots i was hoping you could show me some examples of bad framing vs good framing using your own photos?

like could you possibly grab your camera and take a photo of the first thing you see, inside or outside, doesn't matter? and show me how you would frame that object/thing/person/pet PROPERLY and then also show me how NOT to frame?


im actually trying to take photography more seriously and i think framing is the most important thing to try to learn for now
20 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: framing 101.jpg (1.94 MB, 2000x1333)
1.94 MB
1.94 MB JPG
You can go wrong with Fibonachos
>>
File: 1468328038142.jpg (57 KB, 1000x664)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>
>>2932659
Great composition and colour! You have been awarded the flickr award of composition for gracing humanity with this image!
>>
>>2932005
>Oh, and this is a vital idea for you to understand because you seem to have your head firmly up your ass about the idea of leveraging "predetermined ideas".

I was literally just quoting Edward Weston lmao.
>>
>>2932660
wat

Anyone use a DOF calculator?

Any recommendations about which app is the best?
>>
>>2933414
Nigga, just look at your lens.
>>
No but I'll try it out today
>>
>>2933414
literally every lens worth a shit has this built in
>>
>>2933478
>>2936463

Many modern lenses don't have a DoF scale, even very good ones.

Using an app is a perfectly fine method.
>>
>>2933414
I've got op pic related. It works and is free.

File: IMG_20160929_172015.jpg (2.96 MB, 4128x3096)
2.96 MB
2.96 MB JPG
How are my photos going to turn out /p/ its going to take a while at 2400dpi

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelSGH-M919
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2016:09:29 17:20:16
Image Width4128
Image Height3096
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
F-Numberf/2.2
Focal Length4.20 mm
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Light SourceUnknown
Exposure ModeAuto
Image Height3096
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
White BalanceAuto
Image Width4128
Unique Image IDS13F0SAGH01
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashFlash
Exposure Bias-3 EV
Brightness2.5 EV
ISO Speed Rating50
Exposure Time1/19 sec
>>
>>2936470
this will only work if you replace the box with 4 radioactive takumars.

File: photo.jpg (528 KB, 1000x667)
528 KB
528 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:09:08 09:59:47
191 replies and 104 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: photo-45.jpg (505 KB, 1000x667)
505 KB
505 KB JPG
>>2933430
super comfy sheps

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:09:09 22:36:22
>>
File: 20160821_194527.jpg (1.02 MB, 4997x874)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB JPG
>>2933900
Thanks!

Here's a filthy phone pano that does the view no real justice.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelSM-G900T
Camera SoftwarePixlr
Equipment Makesamsung
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2016:09:28 17:08:39
Light SourceUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Metering ModeUnknown
Image Width4997
White BalanceAuto
FlashNo Flash
Image Height874
>>
>>2919935
Hvordan melder man seg opp til slike moter a?
>>
File: photo-46.jpg (567 KB, 667x1000)
567 KB
567 KB JPG
>>2936168
It wasn't a /p/ meet, it was a meeting of friends who happened to get to know each other through /p/.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:09:09 22:36:23
>>
>>2926871
You prude

File: chitown.jpg (665 KB, 1500x1125)
665 KB
665 KB JPG
>have Canon L 24-70 (series 1) lens
>never been on a shoot, always sat in a camera bag or on a desk, never dropped/etc.
>decide to sell on ebay
>take a few pics through the lens to prove it works, package it and prep for shipping immediately after.
>3 weeks after guy receives it, messages me
>tells me he used the lens on a shoot, during said shoot 2 of the ring mount screws came out and the autofocus stopped working
>doesnt want to screw them back in, wants full refund
>thinks this is a defective lens, screwing the screws back in (even with loctite) wont keep them from coming out
>i said no refunds in the auction, he starts a claim through ebay.

I just want to check, this guy is full of shit right? I googled around and what few instances of any mentionings/dealings with screws there are it seems to be a trivial issue, just tighten them and if you really want to use a teensie bit of loctite.

Do these screws coming out actually make the lens not work? There is no fucking way a lens mounted to a cam body has the space to allow not 1, but 2 screws to come out right?
23 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Homeboy just slipped up again. Got another message 60 seconds ago, heres a small part:

"To be clear, I've fired a total of 8, maybe nine, shots with this lens, and told such to the eBay rep to whom I spoke*. I took two shots after receiving the lens and checked edge sharpness (with viewfinder only), placed it In camera bag, and then used it for a shoot on my property, not transporting the lens."

Now he's admitted to using it on separate occasions.

another congenial quote:
"I WILL NOT proceed with your suggestions, without direction from eBay"

*this is the first mention of this, even later in the message he states he'll speak to one tomorrow.
>>
>>2933503
Why not just ask him to take a picture of it?
>>
>>2934383

Any updates, anaon? Looking forward to this post being justice porn.
>>
>>2934358
>I used to live in Uptown

Do you like taking it in the ass?
>>
>>2933728
>in the uk it implies a 6 year warranty covered by the seller.
You literally just pulled that out of your arse.
It's 2 years and you'll have a hell of a hard time trying to prove it's not wear and tear in a small claims court.

At that point you're now batting above the price of the lens. It also does not apply in any way to private sellers or 2nd hand stores.

UK Policy is watertight on these issues, the only reason it's even two years is because of the EU directive.

There's something very aesthetic about 30s-40s colour photography (the original colour photos, not coloured in b/w), especially from nazi Germany, that seemed to be quite ahead in colour photography, although Russia also knew pioneering work, especially from Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky. However, the Russian photos were made from 3 separate colour-filtered monochromatic photos, whilst (I think) the German ones were made with real colour film.

Would anyone happen to know more about what processes were used? I'd like to know how they were made and what caused the specific aesthetics.

https://www.shockblast.net/hugo-jaeger-photography/
http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/color-photos-from-nazi-germany/
http://www.gridenko.com/pg
http://mashable.com/2014/09/30/russian-revolution-in-color/#_Co1PDkLSkqk

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1400
Image Height945
93 replies and 23 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2925892
>implying
>>
>>2925892
You're retarded
>>
>>2936184
I meant expired film
>>
>>2936383

they toss it into the machine, they dont need experience for that. maybe you should shoot a bit overexposed (if not a whole stop) to counter the aging of the film.
>>
>>2936415
Yeah idk, I thought maybe some professional shops do hand development or something, but on second thought, that's unlikely. I'll shoot it overexposed like you recommended. The Agfachrome rolls I ordered are expired 10-20 years, so that's quite some time.

File: C00002150-y1080px.jpg (861 KB, 1440x1080)
861 KB
861 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX Q7
Camera Softwaredarktable 1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2016:09:27 09:32:57
Exposure Time1/25 sec
F-Numberf/1.9
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash
Focal Length8.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1440
Image Height1080
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
41 replies and 14 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2936036
He meant two differently formatted names.
of course isi got in, isi's one of the only people in the book that still regularly posts on /p/, most of these are Firstname Lastname photographers from Facebook that posted in a "post your website" thread once a year.
>>
>>2934319
what site is used for making this ptohobook?
>>
>>2936243
>http://www.blurb.com/books/7343889-p-2015
>>
>>2936237
Top 5 Worst:
5. (tie) donotnoot - landscape (25) - anon - playground (101)
4. Alessio Minardi - chick in snow (43)
3. Kyle Ferrand - cat (117)
2. Carrick - nude (57)
1. Martin Munoz - vidya (58)
>>
File: PoopArea.jpg (181 KB, 1200x801)
181 KB
181 KB JPG
>>2935342
Hi, whats going on here?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:09:19 09:45:42
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Brightness-2.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: image.jpg (104 KB, 640x480)
104 KB
104 KB JPG
Last one hit bump limit

Anything about Lenses, Cameras, mounts, Systems, buying, pricing, selling, etc. GOES IN HERE!

Don't open new threads for gear-related issues
No pointless (brand) arguments and dickwaving allowed! You have been warned! Just questions, answers and advice!

I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!

And don't forget, be polite

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width640
Image Height480
Scene Capture TypeStandard
239 replies and 22 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2936423
BGN rating covers a fairly wide variety of conditions on keh, so I doubt a single sample will be very useful.
>>
>>2936422
gay
>>
>>2936450
I am a total /p/haggot
>>
Anyone know some good priced speed lights?
>>
File: Canon_11-24mm.jpg (391 KB, 2500x2500)
391 KB
391 KB JPG
How does the Canon 20mm f/2.8 compare to the 11-24mm f/4?

Is it the same or better at f/4?


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.