Go /p/ro.Want:• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread. Do Not Want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki
rate my film snapshits from my Vietnam tripshot on a Ricoh GR1
ok i think thats it.
Great stuff, but you really should've increased your shutterspeed for a lot of these.
imagine glasses but just for photography. photography glasses.
>>4518242Well lucky they're not too big
>>4518254>Well lucky they're not too big
>>4518258Yeah actually now that you mention it the glasses are pretty big too, huh.
>>4518242>>4518258while they are goofy i wonder how normal would it feel to wear them in public.Would people suspect you of taking creephots and photographing exposed female feet in summer?
>>4518194imagine a camera that generates pictures by itself, so we can stop wasting time taking photos and focus exclusively on gear threads
Please rate. 0: uninteresting snapshit1: deeply flawed2: decent, interesting, cool3: striking image
>>4518281>Thanks. Good point. It's hard to get different angles though since the buildings stretch up there and i'm down there. But I'll try to mix up the shapes at least.Based that you're open to criticism, a lot of people really aren't. Not that your other photos were bad, they just became more of the same. That red building one was also kino and was really visually interesting despite being the same angle.As for angles, really just try out some weird shit. Even getting right up close to the building and putting your camera against the wall looking up can do interesting things. Look for shapes in the buildings too, geometry is really neat when doors and windows all make strange lines and you add some odd angles to them.
>>4518289My harshest critic is myself, doesn't even compare to what's here. I actually think this thread was pretty positive, I got serious feedback and got compared to a pro even if to say I'm worse. Means at least my stuff is worthy of critique.The secret objective of this thread was to decide which photos to print alongside OP's pic for an art fair. I think I'll go with 3 and 4. I think I'll print OP's in A3 and the others in A4 to save money and highlight my best pic.Will try to mix up my angles. I'm going tonight on a photo walk on the french riviera. That's where I got inspired to do minimalist building shots. Might post in a new thread in August.
I actually have more shot that might fit a series in this theme. The problem is it was taken long ago on a filthy digital ewaste while my newer pics are shot exclusively on a glorious half frame film camera. Therefore the details are mushy and pixelated so I overlaid some fake grain on it to make it look like the others, but still it's not quite there. Probably I will never use this. Twas good practice though.
Im going back to aps-c, pic related. I have finally gained wisdom and dropped the pretensions. It only took me a decade. Bros, 24MP is enough. Film is dead. Medium format, film or digital, is only worth it if you shoot professionally. save yourself the pain. Just shoot. Don’t be a gear whore.
>>4517696>>4517706So you paid thrice (3x) the price of a used 5D2 to have>worse AF>worse lenses>less resolving power>foveon tier high iso performance due to wormjiFunny that you would tell others to not be a gear whore, only to shoot the brand that stays in business by selling to people who only take photos of their camera.
>>4518079>35mm film is 275mpThe whole roll maybe :D
>>4518064Hmm this bot hasn't learned how to answer basic questions yet
>>4518127>no ur the botAutistic kid or AI? We may never know
>>4518079Nice b8 m8, I r8 8/8
As someone who has decided to live without the distractions of a smartphone, can you recommend me 2 cameras?>1 camera suitable for everyday carry (pic related, it's my old camera from the time before smartphones I just dug up, I want to go back to that "simpler" time), recommend me the best there is available today>1 professional style camera, I'm considering strongly the Canon EOS R6 Mark III, not sure which lens to get, looking for a lens that is multipurpose so I can just get one initially
>>4517506For the quality I would have assumed an older phone.Maybe it's the subject that does not trigger bad processing.Pic related is the kind of processing I expect to see on a modern phone.
>>4517547Phone suck balls. My picture is super up close of a piece of paped
>>4517442kek why am I not surprisedthere's a reason phones ate up the digishit market
>>4517750To be fair that camera is really old, was not a top tier one hack when I bought it, and still the picture was sharper than the phone
>oh my SCIENCE im a heckin enlightened "dumbphone" user and yes I read Jordan Peterson and Meditations
lemme see your shots for the moon!this is mine btw captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settingsi gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
>>4516932>fringing is blueOof. Chromatic aberration.Yeah, not gonna fix that. Best you can do is reduce it later with software: select the purples and tone them down.https://nightskypix.com/what-is-chromatic-aberration/
>>4516932keep in mind atmospheric dispersion, only shoot when its fairly high
Nikon P900, freehand
Should I get a nikkor 1000mm refractor telephoto lens?
>>4518192That's some big bucks. What for? If you're a pro photographer and that lens pays for itself, yes (birding, astro, surveillance, ...). If you hope to get a "Wow!" shot to post on an anonymous forum (here), you've got more money than sense.
QOTT: What is the most expensive thing you've broken? Was it your fault?
>>4518182and the thinner one is 100-150
>>4518182Yeah there's three main ones PD makes.>SlideThis is the wider, one, the best one they make.>Slide liteSmaller, thinner, cheaper version of the slide. Good for small camera>Leashthis is the one that the one you posted is a copy of. Its like the slide lite, but cheaper and thinner still with a different adjustment mechanism.Theres also some leather ones now but idk if theres copies of those yet.
fuck it bought both of these. >>4518141 >>4518178ill come back to tell you about the quality in couple days.also got one of these. was the cheapest option.really fucks me how you could get this stuff for like 2 euros just last month but the new retarded eu tax law makes it pointless and you have to overpay out the ass. fucking garbage.>>4518190yeah i havent seen the slide ones being cloned, the one with the metal buckles. though i also dont really get the point in that additional weight.
>>4518191>the one with the metal buckles. though i also dont really get the point in that additional weight.Its preddy gud, its only aluminum so it does weight that much. Its just a really good quick adjustment method. It clamps down on the strap so you dont need to pull very hard at all when its unlatched to adjust it. Since it has the lugs, you just buy once and never need another strap. You just leave the lugs on your cameras and you can detatch the stap easily. I cannot shill it harder, its the best camera strap.
>>4518193it may be peak, but it costs as much as my lens...
Redwood EditionPreviously: >>4510615
>>4518002I like this. Little devotional statues make excellent portrait subjects: ever they are in quiet contemplation of the holy things above.
Bumble bee through a 700mmTough manual focus
>>4518179Thanks. Was in a storefront window. Tried to capture it with interesting light.
anyone get good pictures of the wildfire smoke?
A thread for all such varmints, critters and such-like as ye may find crawlin' on they bellies round about these parts. Furry or skinny it makes no difference at all to me. I pray to the Lawd we may reach image bump limit in due time. AMEN! Let's ride, boys.
>>4517028Mindo, Ecuador
>>4517029Sumatra, Indonesia
Near Tena, Ecuador
Rishikesh. India
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent.>The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting.>The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography.Post your night photos!
4chan post thing is a fuck had a hell of a time getting the file size right
>>4518092try resizing your photo newfagno one’s monitor is 6000 pixels long or 4000 pixels wide
>>4516938>Intentional movement.I did move the camera intentionally, yes, and for anyone trying out ICM themselves, know this: less is more.
>>4518092Just resave it as a .jpeg
A photograph is simply a photon's recorded wave function. It ripples through spacetime and is possible due to it being electromagnetic fields. Digital cameras treat its fields like a solar panel would. Why it act like this is in order for a photon to get its wave function quantization exist. So all in all it is just the energy of quantization. Possible due to the mathematical nature of the universe. And all of this photography is possible because a photon's wave function can be accumulated enough to be recorded. The joke I make about this is that it is like engineering an image from how a camera is exposed to the scene it sees from the ripples of light.
how can photos be digital if our eyes aren't digital?
>>4518107It's like comparing a fluroescent bulb to an led bulb.
>>4518167Brain neurons vs. Electronic components.
>>4518172Both are shit compared to incadescent bulbs.
>>4518167How do you know they aren’t?
>best autofocus>best lens mount>best hybrid cameras>best full frame cameras>powers the world's sensors>best camera variety >best pocket cinema cameraswhy buy anything other than a sony?
>>4518058>i’ve never heard of anyone using it for photos.That's because it's not turned on by default. Normies are afraid of their camera menus and just leave everything on defaults.
>>4518058>An m43 sensor’s raw file has the same dynamic range as 10 bit video or an HEIC filehttps://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%20R10,FujiFilm%20X-T30,Nikon%20Z%2050,Olympus%20System%20OM-1%20Mark%20II,Sony%20ILCE-6700
>>4518156This chart is quite inaccurate taken at face value because the actual measured ISO of an olympus or panasonic foolturds at 200 is actually 100, so the entire 4/3 line is shifted to the right. Claff’s charts are not adjusted for comparing disparate cameras.Also, 10 stops equals 10 bits. HEIC and jpegXL, 10 bit.
>>4518157>the actual measured ISO of an olympus or panasonic foolturds at 200 is actually 100it varies. That's misleading as a blanket statement. Discrepancy between ISO setting and measured ISO is not unique to m4/3.Too bad they don't have newer cameras on this chart.https://photonstophotos.net/Charts/Measured_ISO.htm#Canon%20EOS%2077D,Canon%20EOS%20RP,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1%20Mark%20II,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1,Panasonic%20Lumix%20DMC-GH2,Panasonic%20Lumix%20DMC-GH3,Panasonic%20Lumix%20DMC-GH4,Sony%20ILCE-6600
>>4518168Do you really, really, really think a micro four thirds has the same dr as a z50 when all other (real world photographic) tests show it’s consistently a stop behind or more?The chart is nor for comparisons, but selecting ideal ISO settings for better reality scanning
Brand Loyalty EditionPlease post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.Thread Question: How much would you suffer for your art?Previous thread: >>4511253
>>4518146Lighten green, darken red and blue. It can be nice for pictures with trees or other green stuff.
>>4518146Here is an example of green filter. I forget how dark, but I remember it was a green filter.
>>4518145Do I really need a yellow filter to discern between white and blue in the sky? The chart for Foma reads lower sensitivity in the blue spectrum.
>>4518161Yellow is kind of like red, but it doesn't darken the skies so much. It's a classic choice for street photography type scenes.
The eternal question: color filter or CPL to make the sky more punchy?
This zesty guy makes a call like he drank too much, "uhzahhh!"
>>4518118Absolutely, thank you! It was shot with my Nikon z50ii + 180-600mm, insanely killer body for the price.
>>4518119Killer shot bro holy Hannah
>>4518119Pressed like and subscribe
Lil' family
Just installed birdnet-go on a raspberry pi 5. How deep will the bird hole go now?
