Unsuccessful Tries EditionPreviously: >>4525845
>>4531392You're disingenous, that's my post-hack tripcode. Secure tripcodes changed after the site was hacked.
>>4531389I have another shot with this house further away from the edge and it's still crooked. It's an old castle on a hill. Not a single straight line in this scene. I can't even tell if this photo is properly level or not.
>>4531390You are just plain useless...
>>4531396>Secure tripcodesSorry but I have schadenfreude
Why can't Olympus make a camera this compact? Why can't Panasonic? Are they stupid? This is literally the only M43 camera with any raison d'être at all right now.
>>4529364yes dear everyone is wrong except you and youwithyourtripoff all the cameras everyone else (especially people who take more photos than you, ie: more than 1 a decade) prefers are actually a straight downgrade from a 20mp canon DSLR that blurs every photo no exceptions
>>4529366The blurrier one here is the one without OLPF.
>>4529373it would be awesome if you could actually shoot real cameras with real subjects instead of relying on dpreview's shoddy tests processed in one of the worst editors known to mantoo bad you dont even know how to use a camera
>>4528489>it totally sucked the joy out of the entire formatJust buy the small lenses instead lol. Oly released revised versions of the small 14-42 and a couple 1.8 primes (still waiting on the 12, 30, 45, and 75 tho), and they're all sealed now too, it's sweet.
>>4528524Just get a Nikon 1 series, you'll have the same image quality
I'll start
>>4526438cute
>>4524791Evil nigga
>>4524791See, this guy here proved the point I've been making for years. Make it black and white, crush the blacks and you have artâ„¢ just like Moriyama.Street photography and the circlejerk around it have been a disgrace to photography.
It is time.
>>4531321
>>4531324
What apps allow shooting for direct captures of the phones camera (or more control), without all the filters added by your default camera app?
>>4531219crop out the bullshit bottom rightotherwise kino
>>4531402I'm assuming you were referring to the little bit of land on the bottom right. I just did a quick heal and clone
Just ordered my first p1100 superzoom. What should I expect? Will my new zoom addiction be satisfied?
>>4531064yeah that's what it's all about
>>4531064Okay this is admittedly not bad. There's not much fine detail, and it took a very bright day to pull it off, but this is boomer birdography 101. Genuinely good enough to land yourself in a scarcely read photo magazine.
Insta and whatever else thread for wherever anons post their photos.https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/Do any of you tend to go for certain themes and styles? Or just try anything?
Anyone else noticed something messed up with Instagram notifications? I don't use application, instead use normal browser on desktop but it recently stopped giving me notifications about mentions (those @ in posts) and today noticed that someone added me to observed and I got no notification about that. Rest seems to work fine but I don't really know what is going on.
>>4519224Yeah, I remember the good old days when Instagram was actually about sharing your work and not being a "content creator".I've found a good alternative, if you have an Android phone, you can download a modded version of Instagram. With it, you can disable ads, reels, suggested posts, and switch the feed to be in chronological order and see only posts from the people you follow. I know it's not ideal, but it's worked for me so far.
>>4531239Well, do fucking share??
>>4531308It's called InstaPrime.
leaf editionFormer thread: >>4523061
>>4526327You cut off the subjects ass you retard
>>4529689You're right but why so rude?
>>4527282Set white balance to K and dial in your color temperature manually so it looks as close to real life as possible. I don''t think playing with hues will be productive here. Auto WB makes warm lights cold and cold lights warm to even everything out to middle gray and that's often not desirable.Set your exposure manually so it looks as close to the real life as possible. At night this could mean underexposing by 1 to 2 stops. At night cameras will boost exposure and by extension ISO as high as possible to make dark areas not dark but gray. This should cut down the noise significantly.Play with DR settings in your camera (DR200 and DR400). They can help protect the highlights at the cost of extra noise in the shadows. Decide if you like the results yourself. Those settings can be a hit or miss.
>>4530009And use a fucking tripod.
>>4526169Well your pic is real dog shit
todd hido enjoyers, share your picsP.S. Please close your blinds at night. I already feel weird enough photographing your home in the middle of the night.
>>4525354intimate distance is a retrospective of all his works and is relatively cheap. is there any point buying house hunting if it's pricier?
>>4524705fuck me i based my entire a level photography coursework off this guy. got a b so was a wise move i guess. love his style. picrel my favourite
>>4525354I picked up 2 eggleston books (guide and the last dyes) for less than 80 bucks each last month, the only photo books that are consistently that pricy are like hardback taschen ones or maybe a super fancy exhibition catalogue>>4524705>>4524706>>4526132damn this is a nice style of photography
Aura.
>>4531177Somehow, he's a good B&W photographer; he just doesn't understand what makes a good color image, which he shoots 99% of the time. Someone needs to force him to shoot a Pentax K3III Monochrome for the rest of his life. At gunpoint.
>>4529871Slide film doesn't have that much latitude. Ken chose to let the clouds blow out.
>>4531227>200% clarity halos>good
>>4531269It's part of the aesthetic :^)
>>4531269Noticed that after I posted it lol, but it would be a good image without the artifacts. His fault for shooting JPEG
Where the hell do you get models these days? It used to be that you would just go on Model Mayhem or find some chick on instagram and shoot TFP but those days are over. I wouldn't even mind paying for a chick's time, but even that seems difficult these days. Not a lot of chicks into "modeling" these days, no websites dedicated to it, etc. I guess they're all doing onlyfans or something. Any way, anyone got some tips?
>>4530689I might be interested. what are the deets?Not on disc.
>>4530723You asked this already, and got your answer:F80 or F100
>>4531057anybody notice that F100 4x-ed in price?
>>4531058Maybe because every shitbox youtuber has shilled it this summer. Not saying they were objectively wrong in doing so, but if my (second) F90x dies, I will have to pay more to get one..
>>4530787Probably in the Sugar Thread I have a bunch of these to upload and I can't remember if I uploaded them or not so I'm just going to put them up anyway later this week, maybe even today. I'm trying to get through all of the Bonneville stuff I did and there's like 7000 pictures and it's mostly just holding down the shutter button on my D3 and D4 and letting them eat while a car goes by. My underwater work is done with a 14/2.8 Sigma EX, that photo, a 24/1.8 and 28/1.8 EX, and a 35/2.
>>4530731I think i'm gonna go for the kenko 45 for the simple reason I like this focale. I was aware of the 28mm but I actually dislike the super wide effect. I guess it's half a question of preference and half a question of subject, because I can imagine 85mm or more being manageable for nature scenes where surroundings are big and there's ample space to move around, but taking photos from the road biking like I do it happens a lot that I cannot move much from where I see a composition, so a standard focale is more convenient.>>4531063Thanks! me too actually. Gonna take some time though I think, because I rely a lot on the weather for good light and 90% of the day are just cloudy here.
>>4531087Let me quote some tips I got from a Pictorialist in an email:1 - For city scenes and landscapes Pictorialists rarely, if ever, used soft focus lenses. They used rectilinear lenses/fully corrected optics (which could mean soft focus lenses stopped down to f/20 or lower, but often didn't). 2 - Pictorialist sense of light, luminosity, tone range comes _not_ from the scene, but from working the image between negative processing and printing. They did all kinds of things to an image before it ever went to final print. [Oil/bromoil selective brushing, etc.]3 - Soft focus lenses used by Pictorialists were [mostly] deployed for portraiture. Often. But not always.
>>4531167Appreciate the advice! But I think I'm just not a pictorialist then. What I took from the pictorialists, is that what I thought a photo looked like was just an utilitarian convention, and that I can create images that fit my vision without using a computer. Because I'm just printing in my bathroom, it's a bit tedious to have most of the process happening there like the pictorialist did, so instead I make do in camera with lenses for now.>Pictorialist sense of light, luminosity, tone range comes _not_ from the scene I'm reading En Passant which is a retrospective of Leonard Misonne's work, they quote him many times stating light is the single most important factor in taking a photograph, and that is also my opinion and what I want to use on my images. Of course his photos were also heavily modified during printing, but I do believe his best images would have not been possible without exceptional lighting conditions. I've posted this photo in the fgt thread where there was both bright sun and heavy rain using a tiffen black pro mist 3, I think he used similar lighting conditions with sun filtered through fog, although obviously this is nowhere as good as what he did. I'm also working on some color landscapes using the tiffen on my medium format camera. Those maybe should look closer to the traditional light blur effect I've been referred to in this thread. But I have neither the capacity to develop or print those at home right now.
>>4531235Hey, whatever works to make a beautiful image. That's Pictorialist. My favorite Platinum printers, Frederick H Evans and PH Emerson, were both "straight" printers who didn't manipulate their negatives at all - but they're still Pictorialists. Some of the best ones, too. Retouching like in oil/bromoil just allows you full control over how the print will look. You're technically working from a smaller "set of tools", but we're just doing this for fun. It doesn't matter. My ultimate goal is learning oil printing, but I'll be taking a Pt/Pd workshop next month because I love the tonal range.
>>4531238Oh wow, that's a haunting image. I'll look up this guy.I'm also aiming to learn some more advanced printing technique, but it takes a long time because I'm completely alone as an amateur photographer here in Norway so there's no workshops or community really, and there's a 60% tax to import chemicals. So for now i'm just toning cyanotypes and shooting soft focus, but as you say, the most important is to have fun and become famous and rich from my art. Just kidding. Enjoy your workshop.
would it be technically possible to control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basis?
>>4523765With more and more linear ISO invariance sensors it pretty much is, you might get a second base ISO at 400 or 600 where thenoise reduction hardware kicks in but pretty much any high ISO shot is just this base ISO digitally clipped and exposure increased, very similar to increasing the exposure slider. The noise will be the same, all exposure properties will be the same. It has been for 10 years.
don't know where else to ask this but you lot seem savvy enough What is the easiest way to have a GPS app running on my phone while shooting photos, and then I dump the photos and the geolocation data to my computer and have the nearest/interpolated location attached to the EXIF of each photo?
>>4523318>>>4523318>control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basisWhy not do in post process on the raw pixels? Cannot see a different outcome.
>>4523778Dual conversion gain sensors are not noise reduction hardware you dunning kruger ass schizo retard snoyimIts basically turning off a high dynamic range circuit that stores more charge to switch to a more sensitive and less noisy one that cant store as much charge but detects finer increments. Noise reduction is what pentax does. No extra light is stored. No extra shadows are detected. Its just a noise reduction slider on a chip for when the camera processor is too weak to run a good NR algorithm. Modern sensors read both of these circuits simultaneously (sony a7v, lumix s1rii, om om1ii) or sequentially (lumix g9ii).
>>4523318Apparently that's what's described in this Nikon patent>US-20260281583-A1But I can't read legalese so correct me if I'm wrong. Could just be describing a faster sensor for all I know.>An image capturing element includes a first substrate having a plurality of pixel blocks including at least one pixel, the plurality of pixel blocks being arranged to be aligned in a row direction and a column direction, and a second substrate having a plurality of control blocks including a conversion unit which converts a signal output from the pixel into a digital signal and a through electrode unit configured to output the signal converted into the digital signal by the conversion unit, the plurality of control blocks being arranged to be aligned in the row direction and the column direction.
Previous - >>4529615>wet plate chud edition
>>4530984Kek, based
>>4530985It's common knowledge that panasonic's AF-C is incredibly bad in stills, often boasting a 30% hit rate on a person walking towards the camera. They tuned it entirely for video because realistically, no one would use a camera as dogshit as a panasonic or a mount as full of oversized, overpriced mediocre glass as L mount for any reason except taking advantage of panasonic being basically sony with every codec enabled in firmware. It's also common knowledge that canon has absolutely zero accuracy issues in AF-S. Literally completely unknown outside of one chart made by poles.Shill disregarded. I'd care if tony northrup, roger cicala, jim kasson, or someone else competent found an issue.
>>4531000>They tuned it entirely for videoWrong, in fact DfD hunts in video. It's a known problem.
>>4531000>>4531006https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG8-ecvu3ko
>>4530957>$636 for a fucking adapterYou gotta be shitting me
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit.Last thread: >>4433352
>>4530341Are you using flash or continuous light/reflectors?
>>4530354I am not, but maybe I should start experimenting.
>>4530413I actually fell asleep in the middle of uploading these...
>>4530413Did not have a flash or reflector so i used my wifes mirror, the round one that magnifies and has a small stand and rotetes to redirect sunlight light on some of my subject so i could use higher ss. Works for some insects, others don t like it. Still don't know if i should get a flash or some continuous led light. I know flash is better and freezes movement but some ppl use leds or only nat light with reflectors and difusers
mushroom.
Moar?
>>4529666>It's not a fucking art gallery print. Get real.You seem upset.
