tome esta foto en un lugar cultural
La mayoría de 4chan no habla español.
>lugar cultural>club gay americano
Unsuccessful Tries EditionPreviously: >>4525845
>>4531392You're disingenous, that's my post-hack tripcode. Secure tripcodes changed after the site was hacked.
>>4531389I have another shot with this house further away from the edge and it's still crooked. It's an old castle on a hill. Not a single straight line in this scene. I can't even tell if this photo is properly level or not.
>>4531390You are just plain useless...
>>4531396>Secure tripcodesSorry but I have schadenfreude
>>4530645i like that, feels like one of those "kids toys" effects for some reason, like, if you added some blur to the edges or something it probably would turn out great
Rank the Trump Portraits
>>44321141 - Don't smile. Seem serious.2 - They've realized I'm an idiot.3 - I'm gonna destroy America bitches.4 - Hurry up. It's sleepy time.
>>4432114On a scale of pedophile to traitor I'd rate them pedophile and traitor but also murderer.
>>4528338Heckin' upvoted!
When can we admit he's handsome
>>4513163this looks like shitlook at the clipped highlights for christ's saketell me this isn't official?
Theme: CloudsAll photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots.Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged!
>>4520619Pretty cool it worked at all, let alone enough that we can tell sky, clouds, and a horizon of sorts.
Clouds around the eclipse
Found this one on Wikimedia Commons. It’s one of the featured pics on there. It was taken last year, March 29, during a partial solar eclipse. The clouds made it especially attractive to me.
>>4520288This is great, but the framing seems very off
Made this zine with photos from Kolkata... I am not a fan of writing long walls of text to explain the work or maybe its just not that deep. Tried to illustrate the masculinity of the workers in contrast to the flowers' delicacy and also tried to transmit the claustrophobic aspect of that market with images with strong blacks. Printed it at home.Rate it harshly.
>>4536251Its not self promotion the video is in unlisted mode. Just easier to show the zine in a video.
>>4536248Sure would be better with chill lo-fi beats, cut ins, and shutter noises instead of just heavy indian breathing
>>4536246It looks nicely made, who will see these market workers? Nobody in my area would make such a thing because market workers would not pay for it and are already claiming priority over advertisers anyways. :)
>>4536263lol didnt notice we can hear my breathing. its european breathing though>>4536309i sold the zines at publishing fair and through instagram
We had a really nice Zine and photobook thread a little while back, why dont you share some photos of your Zine on this here photography board. Would love to see it.
>crushed blacks! lost detail in the shadows!>part of the sky is blown out!>why are the subjects in the CENTER?>needs some serious cropping dude
>still regions with detail-less black and white>I told you dumb retards [sic: redundant wording]: Not crushed, not clippedlol
>>4538359Retard
>>4538275looks better with the hard light and shadows in the original photo. This is just boring.
ran it though camera raw and did lens correction, noise reduction and maxed out the contrast slider. Why can't these painters learn how to edit their paintings. pfft.
>>4538380>continues projecting
What is the point of photography anymore? On shitagram I get 8 likes max. Is this it? Is it over?
>>4538357projecting. not everyone buys oodles of professional cameras and professional lense for hobby use. especially not because the thought of not having hitler in power gave them anxiety, goyim.>b-b-b-but consumer cameras are le cuckeda z5iic is more than enough for you, way more than enough, and its only advantage is being more fashionable and socially acceptable than a used DSLR, it's just to get you laid instead of getting you suspected of being a pedophile by bystanders
>>4538361Mhm keep telling yourself you are better having mountains of e-waste because you didn't buy "professional". You goyim will never understand hehe.
>>4538363>noooo you have a $100 DSLR and two lenses noooo funko pops>that is JUST like my two $1500 cameras and mirrorless lens collection
>>4538011I cannot afford to shoot pussy, anon
>>4537847Do not shoot for likes, or for recognition, these are negative influences on your body of work and are not true to who you are.Social media is stupid I can post the most well-composed photograph with the best lighting something absolutely magnificent and get 28 likes, while some bitch with her tits hanging out on her way to work will get 2m. Ignore the social media dog and pony show, shoot for yourself not a bunch of vapid douchebags addicted to short format doomscrolling.
Will update as images are processed, will be Speedweek and a bunch of other stuff I did over the months.
>>4538381>filenameoldfag detected, reveal yourself at once
I'm quite surprised that we haven't really seen Ai being used in panorama stitching software.I would have thought that, by now, we would be seeing neural feature matching, depth aware alignment, generative seam reconstruction, etc. Ai being used to identify surfaces and textures and blend them properly. To spot perspective and angle changes and account for them in the stitching.Yet here we are, with photoshop and PTGui, still using stitching methods from 2007. I guess theres just no money in stitching. Except maybe for adobe, who are on their asses right now and charging people extra just to generate small image fixes.
>>4537477Isn't this a non issue if you figure out your camera's nodal point?
>>4537887Did you happen to keep the installer?
>>4538181Its still out there and fairly easy to get hold ofhttps://www.techspot.com/downloads/5127-microsoft-image-composite-editor.html
>>4537887I used all of them but found ptgui the best.11.9 is the last cracked version with no virus warning also 30mb installerIce is nice but very limited in adjustments Kolor auto pano is good also but i liked ptgui ui more and was fasterTried hugin but but was designed by linux autists that have no concept of good workflow or gui. Also slowThere is also panorama studio that has the latest version cracked and works quite well but is slower than ptgui, and workflow is a little different but has the fill function that i want for my black zenith 360 drone panoramas. Ptgui introduced it in version 12 and the only 12 version o found cracked everybody is complaining that triggers antivirus so i m stuck with 11.9.Waiting for some guy to reverse engineer the latest version with ai
>>4538303>>4537887byump
Let's see your photographs of fire.
>>4538376I like the spooky ghost in pic related
>>4538376Lastly camp fire through the glass
Egg anon should look into Josef Sudek; his still life photographs are amazing.
>>4528070:D Yes he was an early inspiration for me. I really like the tonality he achieves with his prints.
Egg anon I love you half homo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5fz87xetE4Longer video about his work.
Hey, any other good still life docs or compulation videos on utube?
>>4538215please dont say you're brazilian
where to get luts, the free portera one from google in pic related is assalso editing general
>>4537871The secret is to just shoot film.
I just push sliders around until it feels right. It isn't pocket science.
>>4537871You learn it yourself, presets are shit anyway since you still end up doing adjustments or they just don't work with certain photos.>>4537876People still end up editing film bro.
Street photos that became famous/iconic outside of the photography scene thread
>>4537490Very interesting that the dude has never been identified.
The guy makes the photo, the street photo is a separate photo.
>>4537649he's #1 so being on the cover of a super popular album isn't anything special
Fun fact: The amerilard on this album cover has never been identified, the only thing known is that it was taken in Danville, Virginia 1983 at some festival.
I'm gonna pretend like I am a private investigator for a moment.>Iconic photo seen by gorrilions>Nobody is able to find him or anyone that knows/knew him>Locals from where the festival/convention was held would for sure said something if he was from the area so most likely from out of town>Fat meaning probably only child, parents likely old as this type of amerilardation doesn't suddenly come about and is typically the result of neglect from an early age, giving the little amerilard what he wanted was their idea of love, being that fat in 1983 was not as common as it is today, parents likely also fat and maybe already dead when the photo was taken>Eating that much requires money so probably working as a trucker, clearly the type of work did not involve much manual labor>Obviously a small social circle and family>Age estimate late 20s, early 40s. Does appear to perhaps be some graying of the hair meaning he could be at the higher end of the estimate, just having a youngish face>If in the higher estimate then in the demographic of "sudden heart attack" being an obese smoker>If dead shortly after photo was taken then 15 years had passed before the photo become widely publicized>15 years is more than enough time for people to stop thinking about you>Amerifat version of album cover was just a photo of a shelf filled with LPs so some time would also be required beyond 1998 for it to be known in Amerilardia meaning more time had passed before the chance to make people aware of the mystery.
taken on an Olympus OM-2S in Auto (Aperture Priority) with a Zuiko 50mm prime lenshad a tripod and shutter cable to stabilize the shots, and i should have taken notes on the aperture i used on each shot but i simply didn't think to. contribute if you want, critique if you please
>>4538174i love how long of a trail you were able to get from the taillights while the street itself appears empty and thanks, i'm very happy with those two myself >>4538178yeah nigga it's the whole roll and i've never done this before so i wasn't sure what would turn outfeel free to contribute
>>4538184Ignore the niggerkikes itt and keep posting anon. Put another roll through it and post that when you're done.Everyone should be doing this. We don't need 14 gear generals (thanks fAGGOT), but a dozen different anons maintaining their own threads over the long-term would really boost this board's general health.
>>4538189i'll have to find somewhere else to shoot probably, but since so many turned out in focus and acceptably exposed afaict i'll probably be able to take more different pictures instead of reshooting scenes to have twice the opportunity to get a good photo
>>4538184Cheers anon. I believe that shot was something like an 8 second exposure on 800T. I stopped down quite a bit (maybe F/16?) to drag it out longer.The cars were only going about 20 miles an hour, so it gave the light trails plenty of time to burn in, but the only car that it really caught was the one that slowed down to turn.The abandoned hotel in the background took up the whole block, so there was less lighting than the surrounding area, which is why I picked it. I think a darker street is probably the best bet if you're trying to avoid getting the cars themselves to show up in the exposure.Here's another example from the same roll. Parts of the car itself are only visible right under the street light.
>>4538203nice!the bright blue of the sky and the electric glow of the street contrast well, and the light trails are beautiful up close
Shot a wide panorama of a city on the Nile. Residential blocks, river, hazy light. Shot on [camera/lens], stitched from 4 frames, 6K resolution final.Looking for honest critique on composition and edit. Full-res is available as a licensed print/commercial file if anyone needs it.dramrabdullah.gumroad.com/l/ugnnf
>>4538101Shot on a cheap possibly plastic lens, there's a blooming quality to it. Almost makes it look like a painting. Personally my feedback is I would have picked a better vantage point.Maybe having that trash in the picture is your point, but I don't like it.Ugly view IMO. When it comes to preexisting scenes the "negative art" side of photography shows up. It's what you choose to leave out. It's arguably one of the photographer's most powerful tools, what he DOESN'T photograph.
