The shot is really great and i was wondering if there was a specific studio that makes these kinds of photos? I was thinking of Harcourt in Paris, but no online confirmation that Tyler was photographied there.Also which camera/gear can produce this kind of quality?
>>4466351It looks fake because it would be impossible to use camera movements to get an oval shaped focal plane that is only on his eyes like that.
>>4466356not even with a tilt-shift lens?
>>4466358Definitely not. You can only change the angle of the focal plane. You cant shorten it or change the overall shape. It will always carry through the entirety of the image. Perspective shift wouldn't achieve something like that either. Falloff is also too sharp.Here's an example of using shallow DoF with front standard swing on 8x10.
>>4466351The gradiation of focus falloff above and below the eyes on the mask is clearly not real too
>>4466351Is it a chunk of background or is it fake grain THOUGH?>>4466373You know what American culture is really about
I want to film a Timelapse of a plane trail, contrail, chemtrail, whatever it may be. Just to show that they are turning clear sunny days, into a haze. Not quite overcast but a light haze enough to cover the entire sky. I have witnessed trails starting small; as you would see coming from the plane, and slowly grow and grow. They don’t disappear; just getting wider and wider until it all blends into one big hazy sky.I’m going to assume wide angle is the best lens.As for location is the top of mountain going to be my best bet? W
>>4465755Look up operation sea spray also. A little different, but still extremely cringe for the us govt to do.
>>4465664ME HEREWell it could be anything and it certainly isnt healthy. Point is it ruins nice clear days... my friend is convinced anything from planes can make a clear day hazy. so the point is to show they can
>>4465756>>4466158Aircraft exhaust is already a cloud seeding technique whether intended or not. If a jet flies at high altitudes, it creates new cirrus clouds. Every single time. There is no conspiracy needed. It's basic meteorology.The people planning flight paths might know this and care, or some combination of know/dont know/care/dont care. Cirrus clouds trap heat.
>>4466158Almost everyday...
>>4465749>what you are seeing is burnt avgas mixed with condensationAnon, jets don't use avgas. They use something very similar to kerosin called simply TS-1.
Any last words?
>>4463104Post your best photo and worst photo
OP all of you suspicions are right. Photography is greatest art medium but there is no money in it. I would suggest you to slide into film or painting. In both of these fields you can have a career and recognition for your work. I know utterly dog shit painters who live through by exhibiting their artwork. In comparison I know many good photographers stuck in dead end jobs and living in poverty. Irony is that they don't even get their share of recognition. You can try your hand at fashion/editorial type shit. Or do wedding photography. But these art mediums are not fulfilling and leave you with blue balls.
B A S E DASEDYou should kill yourself too.
>>4463104Photography is dead thanks to digital cameras and the internet. The era before internet and fully mechanical film slr's was the golden age of photography. The digital age is by far the worst age to live in. We have to go back to an analog world.
>>4466204Film and analog printing methods are even more special now that less people are using them.
This is the post for stupid questions that don't deserve their own thread.
>>4466184Not really and no. My use case is high ISO low light shots since I don't dabble with manual settings and tripods too much.
>>4466084Closed cell PE foam? It's relatively cheap and not prone to turn into sticky mush.Get a sheet of of foam to glue inside of cover and a block of foam which fills rest of the case. Arrange everything you want to store on block and trace and cut out shapes deep enough items will be flush with foam block.
>>4466084I'd go with some felt or flocking personally. I've done something similar with a hard-drive case in the past and it's doable just make sure if you get the self-adhesive stuff that it's heavy duty or "jewelry grade" or whatever the fuck. Flocking alone would not provide much in the way of cushioning but you could fill it out with a lining for foam first.
>>4466183I use Topaz Photo + Video, good for enlarging and NR, the face reconstruction can be nice tooI don't use it as much as I thought I would, but it has been nice to haveI can run some examples through it if you have any to postVideo I pretty much just use for upscaling old videos, don't really use it for any actual video work I do.
>constructive interference in out-of-focus areaneat but also a little annoying
What are your setups? Which products can you recommend? And wtf are the bastards from negative supply snorting to justify their pricing?speaking of: Does anyone have the STLs from tonecarrier? I am a poor bastard and want to try them out. other than that, I had no luck with the free printables you find on thingyverse etc.
And finally, this stupid lil' guy. I think an apt name would be film destroyer 9000. I need to return to this as I do have a lot of negatives to scan. It's more of a prototype of what became the slide scanner.Important things to learn from this: - Horizontal mounting of the camera is bad because even if your mount is very firm, it seems like the internal lens elements have a bit of sag or something that causes pitch to be an issue. This wasn't as much of a problem for the slide scanner as that was all done at a much smaller aperture. - The backlight is basically the same except I used WS2811 addressable LED strip, it turns out these chips start behaving oddly when they warm up which meant calibrating the channels was a huge PITA. - I used a Pi to control the stepper. This was what caused any damage to the film as the software-controlled stepping was too rough. - Adjusting the focus by screw rail is much easer than using the lens ring.
>>4465223Nigga I didn't understand a single word of this. Are the photos any good?
>>4464841Mirrorless cameras don’t even make a CLUNK sound when you snap. How are you even a photographer?
>>4465799It can have a shutter that's not a mirror
>>4464842>Unless you already have a 24MP or higher camera and a good macro lenswho the fuck doesn't, m8?>gb2 3rd world
see how the other half livescontribute
nazi paraphernalia
the best camera is the one you already have
>>4462512
>>4462513
>>4461808It depends on the camera. If it's an IP camera it might get a bit tricky, but CAT-5 to RCA adapters exist, so might be worth giving it a shot.
>>4462553>worth giving it a shoti see what you did there.
Some of these CCTV lenses are legit. I used one on an old mft Olympus years ago and rebought it for my fuji.
I took some pictures of cows today.Camera: R5 mark 2Lens: RF 35mm 1.8 STMHave a glass of milk on me. enjoy.Critique is always welcomed
>>4466058okay got it. ill stop. ill put my artistic ambitions to the side. d44vp
>>4466057>deep friedreddit
>>4466059>boomer tutorial edits >artistic ambitionsPick one, fag.
>>4465627>But for gods sake, get rid of that lens asap. Soulless macro-plastic disaster.It is OK for what it is. The focus motor is the main reason I ditched mine.
>>4466049
Film photos from the last few months + some thoughts.
>>4465923Not a great photo, but mainly taken for documentary purposes.This was in the royal academy for the visual arts, which was having a show for students finishing their studies.This wall was in the process of being covered in photos of the wall. On the right is a Hasselblad, the person behind this was taking shots of the wall, 12 per roll, then developing and printing the roll and placing it on the wall. Was interesting to watch.
>>4465925Another photo from the academy.Most of the photos shown were not super great, but what they did better than what I see online most of the time was consistency of subject and long term projects.
>>4460393Why the fuck is that woman playing an electric bass upright with a bow?
>>4465961Why wouldn't she if she can?
>>4465961It's fretless
>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scansAHHHHHHHHH
Should I get a scanner? Is it a quality = price thing or can I get by with mid-low range gear?
scanner is good
>>4411869>he shoots in colour>he doesn't shoot exclusively in B&Wlol.>he doesn't have his own darkroom in his house>with his own fix/stop/developer baths, enlarger, drying racks, sink, and trimming stationlmao even. if you shoot film in 2025 and send it off to someone to process you get what you deserve.
>>4411869Jesus Christ
Cinestill has a $30 kit to develop 24 color rolls. That's barely more than $1 each.
Have you ever gotten a strong emotional response after viewing a specific phot, like you would in a movie ? Or maybe going to an exhibition or reading a book ? Or is photography just "pretty cool" at best ?Pic related is the first response I got when searching " best art photography ever" online. While it's really good and impressive, I can't really say it makes me feel anything in my gut.Post pics that make you feel something, inspiring photographers/books etc.
>>4464797I agree with this, not all photography is art.Some is.an artform would involve skill, talent, craft, a processthe art of photography and the results themselves - photos, well there is a distinction thereare all photos art? are all drawings art?art may in a sense be a processor is it the final result?I have a feeling that we all knoe inherently what art is. And we can see when something is art or isn'tPhotos can be artand photography is definitely an art form
>>4462918Bruce Gilden. If you like him you should check out Stanley Greene.
>>4465626thanks for these>>4465654thanks I'll check it out
>>4465169Art is just a word that was hijacked by commercial interests. It's a commodity which those interests built a walled garden around in order to control the product flow and keep spotty faced upstarts out. Now it seems that spotty faced upstarts defend the garden, into which they are not allowed, with all the 4chan rage they can muster.Beauty doesn't need to be qualified with loaded words, it just is.
>>4465931words can have multiple meanings depending on who uses them and in what context
>be me>start getting into film>bought a fx3 and start shooting in the park to get the hang of everything, namely exposure. >at the park today, two mexican guys park next to me and make conversation (I'm in the south, so its normal to make random convo, and I'm Mexican too)>get a little nervous since it's hard to tell if cartel types or construction worker types>conversation goes on and I get the feeling they are cool>eventually they start suggesting me shoot a a video with the new car one of the guys bought>i think to myself this could be pretty cool so I go with it and start shooting (my literal first shoot with talent if you will).>as I'm shooting this, during some downtime some dumb bitch comes out of nowhere to ask if I can take pictures of her on her iPhone (i literally never take pictures on my iphone and still learning)>take pictures, dumb bitch gets mad and tells me I need to auto focus on her face and makes a snide remark about how I'm the professional>all of this is happening while I'm just trying to shoot some filmon one hand this is cool and actually fun but on the other hand it can be a lot of pressure. its good practice in my eyes to be able to do a quick exercise around filiming other people so I went with it. you have to literally think on the spot.anyways just wanted to share cause it was kinda all over the place. the whole time i was with those mexican guys i was kinda nervous they were trying to steal my camera but they turned out to be chill.
a cautionary tale on learning how to say no
>this nigga is still "learning" how to take pictures on a phone
>>4461912This
>>4465672it was a good experience for OPalthough next time he will have an awful crime happen
>start getting into film>using a digital camerawhat did anon mean by this?>i'm mexican toois this an ESL thing?
Do any of yall know any other film cameras than the gen 3 Polaroid i have and possibly some tips for taking better pictures than these.
>>4465296You can get a back adapter that lets you use polaroid/instax on certain view cameras.
>>4465296>do film cameras other than polaroid exist? >>4462404
>>4465296Even though polaroids are the biggest instant format available, they are still tiny. Only shoot subjects that fill almost the entire frame and where detail is not fundamental (e.g. a single, well framed object or a portrait)Anyway, you have a gen 3 polaroid which even has manual controls through the app and you already ask for another camera even though your photos suck ass compositionally. You are a loser worthless gearfag
>>4465296Sx-70. Modded. Always.
>>4465315this is how i read the question as well and if that's really what OP meant, i fear for the children, i really do. Perhaps if we are charitable maybe he meant instant film cameras? OP, what did you mean friend?
How was that softness of 1980s centerfolds shot on Ektachrome achieved? Was it lens itself or was dude using some filters on his large format camera?
>>4464374Lmao faggot
>>4464534You may laugh now but mouth your daddy kissed you goodbye with had my cock in them.
So, soft lens after all.
>>4465908Yes. The fringing on the second pic is a dead giveaway.
