1/20
>>450628327/20
>>450727628/20
>>4506390I agree but it's pretty close to how it presents in real life so that's how I kept it. But I do agree.
>>4504222It's a random snapshit but the colors and lighting are great nonetheless. Now that I look at it it's probably the best photo ITT.
>>4508293I agree, some of the black and whites especially a couple of the reflections are initially a little more attention grabbing and well composed but the tones in the cloud and sky of the OP image despite it looking less carefully thought about make for a better image that keeps your eye moving around the frame
It is time.
>>4488942You just reminded me of a place I can go take pictures. Neat old wreck, by the way.>>4496156This is literally Windows XP. It's a decent photo though, being shot on a phone really didn't hinder the vision whatsoever.>>4496157Seems like there was some glare. It doesn't always work but sometimes, if I hold my hand up as a lens hood, I can get a lot of contrast back from otherwise hazy areas like the sky on the left-hand side of your pic there.>>4496158Great pic, too, not at all hurt by being shot with a phone.I'm happy we've got this thread. A lot of great photography happens off-the-cuff when all that's on hand is your phone.
don’t go home through the park at nightpeople were hanged there
>>4508751At least no one can accuse me of not posting a phone photo
Theme: TransportationAll submissions must feature transportation—cars, bikes, boats, planes, trains, etc.Vehicles should be capable of transportation so no photos of abandoned, or incomplete vehicles, loose wheels, scrap parts.All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots.Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged!
>>4507052Very nice. I did a passenger lap in an F-Type around the Ring a few years ago when Jag had Dale Lomas doing rides for them. Was absolutely mega, and sounded amazing.
>>4507063It is a magnificent animal. One of the last real wild things to be produced on that island. Good subject to try out my, "new to me", 300mm f4.
>>4507143Absolutely - I look forward to seeing some results
New thread: >>4508732
Have you ever taken a still life photograph? What did you learn from it? I am not good at it yet, but it is my favourite genre of photography. I like the idea of trying to execute a concept, telling a story with visual grammar and narrative, but there are many factors that can ruin a still life photograph. Pic related needed better composition, angling, leading lines, better props, a better background (preferably with a backdrop because the white wall does not add much), and maybe a better table. It was fun nonetheless, and I think I learned something during the shoot because I tried so many arrangements under a time constraint and learned about workflow.
>>4501942Fire egg pic. I love the found object + egg combo. That glove tells a whole ass story.
Had to do a series of differently lit/diffused ball cube cylinder shots for school a while back. I hated this assignment so much it's unreal
Stilllifebros... please give me feedback on the coherency of these images as a series. I made 8x10 contact prints of them on azo paper the other day. Sunday I will mount and hang them to get a better feeling of them presented in a gallery. I'm feeling really good about this becoming a cohesive body of work. The series is egg + found farm object + geometric shape. My next two ideas are spiral + egg with my vintage soft focus lens possibly, and the more ambitious idea is to take the egg and turn it into the geometric shape and take the farm found object and turn it into the "egg". I believe that the visual grammar I've created so far, and continue to work on, will allow me to create this inversion without the found object necessarily being egg like in shape, but egg like through the visual grammar that I've created in the series. Thoughts???>>4506172This could have been more fun if you chose to be more creative with it. Technically a nicely executed photograph, so good job. What format were you using?
>>4508631Most glaring (pun intended) issue with coherency is the specular highlight on the egg in the last photo, try to light it similarly thoughout the body of work. Im also not sure about the mixing of landscape and portrait orientation but thats more a matter of taste. In general the prints are a bit underexposed maybe? No thoughts on your next shots as the subject doesnt really inspire thought or any emotion in me (subjective)
>>4508636Thanks. Aiming for 10-12 shots, so there will probably be more landscape oriented images in the series to balance things out.Feel the eggs bro. It'll be okay. Promise.
Anyone getting this? The analog fags crying about its price have not seen top end FF mirrorless digital prices I guess.My main issue with it is that panorama is useless for online sharing, a portrait oriented camera like the Fuji 645 point and shoots make more sense for premium film cameras.
>>4508368>You replying to me is doing the same thing you're complaining aboutI wouldn't have anyone to call out if people stopped doing it to begin with >the only difference is you're not self-aware enough to admit it.The real difference is I don't go around the board being dishonest
>>4508369lying to yourself is dishonest :)
>>4508369Arent you the fuji fanboy whiner that got caught being a photo thief? Collagefag aka partially stolen portfolio fag?
>>4508320You're fucking brain dead.I said the problem is social media, not digital.If you just want wide for social media you can just use a smartphone ultrawide lens and crop it vertically.Widelux is for people who want something different, and analog.Nobody cares if you don't want it. It's happening and people will buy it. It exists for a reason.
>>4507645>$5000 camera and they won’t even spare the cash to have a human write the copylol. ChatGPT design the camera too?
lemme see your shots for the moon!this is mine btw captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settingsi gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
I bought this ridiculous fat fucker a couple weeks ago for 100 kangaroo bucks. I had very low expectations of it because >Hanimexand >45+ year old generic telephotobut handheld test shots (of things other than the moon) so far have been surprisingly good, it's reasonably sharp and minimal CA. The big downside is no tripod collar or foot and it weighs over a kilogram, it'll deform the camera body if I try tripod mounting it unsupported.I've attempted a couple of handheld moon shots propped up on other objects and they look pretty decent in spite of the obvious wobble. I've got a 15mm rod LWS system coming in the mail sometime this week, super excited for it to arrive so I can finally get this brick on a tripod and see what it's really capable of.
>>4507617Can't remember what stop I used for this. 1/160, ISO 125. Taken standing up leaning against one of my back verandah posts. It's obviously garbage but I was surprised by the level of detail for a handheld shot. I've taken worse shots on a tripod in the past.
>>4507617Rod supports arrived. Been cloudy and shitty all week here but tonight the skies decided to be kind and all the clouds were gone, took some shots while the moon was still low and yellow. Not the most amazing stuff ever but really not bad for an old generic telephoto lens.
took this one a couple nights ago
>>4508479Same setup but with a x2 teleconverter.
I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire. Which one are you hoping to score?You are going to be getting one right /p/?You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
>>4504722This is from when I just got it about a month or so ago
>>4504722this is cool lolbro looks hammered
>>4470128What is it exactly? Looks like a cheap digital camera?What does it offer over a phone camera?
>>4495041i lub him {:bridgestone kitteh
>>4508220I have the G6 Thumb Camera which is not be exactly same as the Chamera. It's a tiny, cheap and shitty Chinese fixed focus digital toy camera. Result has a look of a still frame from cheap HD dashcam.It's much smaller and cheaper than a cheap modern phone and the results are oversharpened and compressed shit worse but different than a shitty phone.But I do like how the toy deals with a low key scene.If you want a good camera, it's not one. It's a disposable small toy with "character."
Color doesn't matter. Today when you can adjust colors just by pressing a button there's nothing more fake than a color. You should only shot B&W. Black and White photography is real and pure. Shape, shadow and light - this is what makes your photography look special, not some bright oversaturation. If your picture looks good without colors then your picture is worthy
>>4507187unironically I think the GRIVm might be the best and only usable GR camera. because with black and white the joke of ricoh color science, the absolute failure that is rico's AWB and the retarded amount of grain with any ISO above 160 dont matter at all.I thought about getting the GRIVm myself too, but then I realized I can just set my iPhone to monochrome and get better results. so yeah
>>4508463you're just gay, but that's okjust keep enjoying colors
>>4508528Divorce status?
>>4508531I got a sailboat and left photography pretty much behind. It's liberating - just experiencing the moment and not being forced to take photos.
>>4508463Shoot for light contrast and it won't look boring.If you shoot boring flat subjects then it's going to look bad. Which is where colour can help by bringing attention to your subject.
Brazil here and there: People and places
>>4503103familiarity breeds contempt, my brotherfwiw, I think they're aesthetic photos in general
>>4503107this one seems overexposedand it doesn't look greatisn't film meant to be prettier than digital when overexposed? is black-and-white different or is this a defect of your scanning process?>>4499755portraits this soulful are not often postedseems like a wonderful person
>>4508545i like your portraitseven though this one is hazy it's still very nice
>>4508549Thanks>>4508550I don’t thinks it’s the films fault, that was on me learning how to properly expose and the subject also seemed nicer in my head, didn’t manage to properly put my vision into the result. Yes she’s wonderful!
>>4508551Thanks, I would really like to focus a bit more on portraits
Photos taken by the Soldiers who were there.
>>4507753Take care anon. Hope you have some quality time with Pop.:)
Best thread probably on all of 4chan right now.
>>4508294Thank You Friend.
>>4507966Apocalypse Now
>>4507943>Texas timexHuh... Nice
There are like millions of setttings, how do I know which one is the best in my particular case?I've tried to watch some tutorials on Youtube, but couldn't recreate that super fancy feeling you're getting from fashion magazines. For example pic rel is my slop, is it possible to fix it somehow to make it look decent for Instagramm at least?
>>4508375its not a guy, its an AI. notice it’s reusing phrases from the anon that caught it stealing photos. thats its programming. parroting. it begs for photos constantly and then steals them either to use outright or to generate low res "original work". it has no actual original work so it has to ask for a prompt to AI generate higher res versions. the dog photos are human intervention probably but with AI these days who knows…
Is there any recommended mobile editing app? Sometimes I don't want to wait until I'm home and I'm not dragging around a laptop.
>>4508454Snapseed, LR Mobile
>>4508375>says fuji costs as much as a new sony bThe only thing I say about Fujis cost is that they offer the worst performance per $, but I bet you'll forget me saying it this time too>anon exposed you as a photo thieflol, I just take the thief accusations as a compliment at this point, still always happy to prove proof, but I know this board is mostly deliberately malicious trolls and actual dunning kruger retards
>>4508472silence photo thief gearfag
Ideally aggressive flash photography.
>>4501121Thanks for the rundown anon, I only have a A11 Flash and one of those Ulanzi RGB lights, hopefully they should be enough.
I used flash on some farm animals one night. They didn’t mind.
a different timeplease enjoy this humble bumpI hope your interesting thread survives
>>4508321Nice, I'm down to like 6 I use regularly
there are only 10 people on this boardno on gives a fuck anymorethe 10 people here don't even like to look at photographsto busy with their gear and shit or nit pick your shit cause pro lvl Fuck YOU Fags Fuck This |Board
>>4508417im a proi work for the tabloidi downloaded a sick portfolio off flickri bought all the cameras, i mean i work for a camera store and thats how i used a new camera every week, not a shopping addict yeahand i promise i shot a wedding oncebuy my favorite brand and if anyone talks shit about it prove yourself to me or diemayhaps if you need placating i will waste one of my bad photos on you (the good ones are in another thread)-sent from my dog
>>4508420Ignore this snoy shilling fujislug, niggor. Buy a DSLR because, uh, jews! Only film is a worthwhile upgrade from cheap frigidal. Tiny TV users btfo.
>>4508417The nophotos are funny
For the past couple of years I have been practicing photography with "circuit bent" cameras I have built. I am gonna share a few pictures, give some explanations as to the hows, and hopefully inspire some people to pick up this form of photography.Just a disclaimer here, I haven't edited these photos at all besides maybe cropping them. These are how to the photos come out of the camera.
I like your hacking work OP, thanks taking time to post. I enjoy technology and art, digital photos are a nice blend of them which I have only been getting back into the last few months myself.>>4506237Very nice, kinda vapourwave aesthetic>>4506239>>4506240Cool>>4506246Sky with tree is great, reminds of psychedelic fractalsOverall quite interesting knowing why they look this way and the effort you put in to making it glitch out but still usable. The digital scramble breakdown vibe is cool.
>>4506948Thank you! If you wanna dive deeper into this subgenre, there is a nice breakdown you can find if you google "Glitch Cameras and How" by a dude named NOYSTOISE. Other terms like circuit bent photography/circuit bent cameras will bring up similar stuff, too.
What cameras did you use for your photos and what guide did you follow to modify them?
I did a project in college that was based on glitched photos, but glitching in postConvert jpg to txt, open in text editor, modify the text, then save and back to jpg. In my case, I did a series of public speakers and spliced in some of their quotes to do the glitching.Two examples,https://medium.com/lotus-fruit/what-is-post-internet-glitch-art-7baba654345ahttps://famst109ga.wordpress.com/code/Tried a few times now, but I haven't been able to reopen the jpg after modifying.
After much positive feedback to the /m43/ general I re-thought the whole thing. Why limit to one mount if the defining defining feature is the aspect ratio?Let's have a /4:3/ general for all the based chads who shoot in 4:3 ratio!Welcome: Everyone whose system shoots natively in 4:3!Also welcome: Those who accept the superiority of 4:3 and crop their 3:2 (cringe) images to the 4:3 (based) ratio.Not welcome: Everyone else.Topic of the first /4:3/ general ever: Are 5:4 and 6:7 based, too? Or are they just tryhard?Discuss!
>>4505346Tripod and be there.
Redpill me on the Panasonic GH4.
>>4505346tripod or long shutter speed, the OM image stabilization works really well Here's a video of Robin Wong taking very nice looking night time photos, using the same camera model as you, with a 12-40mm F2.8 though. That's on 200 iso though so you can put the ISO a bit higherhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcf8AZod1Zg
>>4508342>tripod or long shutter speedshould've clarified, looooooooong shutter speed on tripod or just a longish shutter speed handheld
>>4508342>>4508343I actually just bothered to go out down the street and give it a quick try myself because I haven't actually tried using my OM at night and the results are definitely not bad at all, 200 iso and 1/13 shutter
