Back in July 2021 there was a thread here about Burna. I found it on an archive https://archived[.]moe/p/thread/3910777 but links to full images are 404. Anyone else still around from back then save the pics? TYIAA
what’s burna? you mean the country Burma? i found a ruby the size of a tangerine there
"Don't Feed The Tripfags" EditionPreviously: >>4533681
>>4535059>comes from decades of DSLR useThat's retarded, if anything DSLR demands you know your shit better. Especially old Canons, there's no recovering many stops of shadows with their FPN.
>>4535062Autist seems to just mean smart a lot of the timehttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581472/High IQ people (ie: jews) = 61mp leica, 180mp phaseoneLow IQ people (ie: tripfags) = 20mp micro four thirds (5mp equivalent), 40mp fuji (8mp equivalent)
>>4535077Equivalence includes aperture, ISO, OLPF and crop factor50mm FF = 25mm MFTf2 FF = f4 MFT100 ISO FF = 400 ISO MFT20mp mft = 5mp20mp aps-c 10mpolpf = -10% resolution
>>4535086This is quality bait.
>>4535086true20mp mft photos look a bit blurry and shit, but when resized to 5mp they are super sharp and virtually noise free
I'll just share a cool photo of river
>>4534922>I wanted a green cat so I got a sony
>>4534922Shadow castThe green light shining through/reflecting off foliage is stronger than neutral sunlight and is mixed with skydome (the bluish light the sky itself radiates)You can ONLY fix this with fill flash, not by buying another camera or something, because all of them do it and none of them will let you magically fix it without fill flash or hilariously piss tinted white balance (AKA the fujifilm solution)
Go to Milford Sound
>>4534932Why are you replying to it?
>>4534968It really shows that this is taken with an iphone. Worse color separation than composite video and everything is oversharpened. Might as well be AI.
Hi, I heard this was a good place to get feedback and advice on my photography.How can I get a consistent “look” with direct flash portrait photography?Specifically, I usually shoot in shutter priority and a static ISO depending on lighting. I have been keeping my flash manual because I noticed TTL was very inconsistent with flash power and not every shot came out how I wanted. The issue I have is that as lighting changes and as I move around or change my focal length I have to adjust my flash, take a test shot, then adjust again, etc. until I have it dialed in to the “look” I am going for.What can I do to improve my process?
>>4534592(iso at 500)
>>4534592im not even tryna insult you but this is the most retarded post I've ever seen
>>4534759chuckledbut, it's just simple light calculations to mimic the way an old film point and shoot would work
>>4534592>"point and shoot film camera">¿manually settings?>"distance to the subject 1-2m" "mess with the shutter speed until the background looks good"what the fuck?
>>4534853correct, modern digital cameras don't have the algorithm of old point and shoots insidean old point and shoot would select one shutter speed and open up the aperture dependig on the distance to the subject.and you're stuck on one isoso there is no manual anything so you recreate it digitally with how im doing itkeeping iso, and flash power fixedand simply gauging distance to set apertureshutter speed to taste which is the luxury of manual flashesmy brain too big
A picture with the Moon making the image interesting - can be just the Moon, or the Moon just being pretty with foreground objects or stars and planets, new or old, but OC.See finder image (next post) for exif.
>>4532331Thanks for the compliment though. I meant to say that earlier.
Hey, Moonies... it'll be very close to Jupiter, in fact occulting it for some of you farther south around 8 AM UT.Get yer cameras out!
>>4533030Rising over the house across the street.Oshiro 500mm lens, ISO 5,000, f/13, 1/2 sec
I wonder if "Moon Photography" includes moons of other planets. If so, here's Saturn and four of its moons on Oct. 6, 2026 at 08:11 UT. L to R: Titan, Rhea, Dione, Enceladus (lost in the planet's glare) and Tethys.
>>4533302Damn, you can even see the rings
Well... I tried to find liminal and unsetting places in my Russian city.Post your liminal photos here
>>4532422>>4532425>>4532427>>4532439>>4532448Still looking for any feedback, good bad indifferent.
>>4534690Extreme indifference. The first one looks like a scene from a Source game, but it's not very interesting. There is no mood or depth to it.There's really no feedback to give.Try to find a subject next time.>>4532628This is the only shot ITT which feels even a tiny bit liminal, but the crop is too tight.
>>4532425This is a photo of a staircase.. Not much else to say
>>4526537
First time taking photosDon’t have a camera yet so used 3ds I think this one looks quite nice
i have so many more, just dont remember where the fuck i saved them
3ds is cool, but some1 needs to make a mod that always manual control of the settings
>>4534673And a homebrew app that allows you to shoot in raw as well.
>>4522350I like this a lot
How long can you let it sit after exposing but before developing? Online I see everything from "you should develop within a few days of exposure" to "you can leave it up till its expiry date no problem". I asked a local camera shop and they said 6-10 months before you start to see degradation depending on the film. Who's telling the truth? I don't remember ever worrying about this back when I was using disposable cameras for everything.
>>4525859overall those seems like good conditions. I would say it's likely the photos will be salvageable with some editing.
I just developed this portra 400 roll after almost 8 years. I'm still trying to figure out if the green tint is because the film is expired or if that's how it's supposed to be. I have 4 more rolls from that time, not sure if I should spend money using them and developing and scanning.
It boggles my mind that photogees go out of their way to buy two decades expired film for more than three bucks per roll.
>>4534773I got three rolls of Agfa Vista 200 just this weekend, they were expired in... 2003. I got the film rolls and a Nikon F-401 with a kit lens as a bonus when I sold off my old DSLR.>>4520441I'm curious how these came out. In my experience the colour films suck past their expiry date but I suppose I'll still try to shoot one roll with high contrast subjects and good lighting...
>>4534777Might be alright, assuming you're from a temperate climate. Have fun with the camera and keep expectations low.
Lens Compression EditionFormer thread: >>4529005
>>4534622Why would I lie? Long lenses and IR were literally the things that lured me into photography. In fact I started out with a DIY approach, I made some filters out of film. Some of the skills I developed thanks to that later proved useful in my line of work.
>>4534624And, and, I, have a dad who works for nintendo and im being gangstalked by husky owning feds and i own a cool motorcycle and a wocketship and a weally nice spurtscaw but it all goes to another school
>>4534624>Some of the skills I developed thanks to that later proved useful in my line of work.In what what way did the skills developped shooting IR photos proved useful becoming a universally hated shitposter?
>>4534644The guy with the nice sports car is the guy with the mamiya 67 not meHe had a Porsche if I recall
todd hido enjoyers, share your picsP.S. Please close your blinds at night. I already feel weird enough photographing your home in the middle of the night.
>>4534437For these 3 i used portra 800 with a very odd filter stack>didymium filter>tiffen cc40M>FLD>scientific quadbandpass filter i had to custom fitThis stack turns all artifical white lighting green while also keeping daylight and warm lighting unchanged by the effect.
>>4534438Example with daylight.
>>4534439
>>4534435I love this.
>>4534435Very dank
Is there a place for this time of cameras outside Electronic News Gathering?i thinks they're pretty neat, but even in the same Canon line, the biggest upgrade was adding USB C
>>4528835Welcome to /p, please use the gear thread
>>4533424i’m flattered
>>4533418Excuse me sir, do you have a loicence for that cammy?
They are very practical for casual videography, not to mention fun. Stabilization is also way better on even an over a decade old mid-range than what you get on a mirrorless photo camera.
>>4533690
The price of classic cameras is getting outrageous. The 7ii is now $6,000. >just film on digitalSome of us consider ourselves camera historians, but now it is literally impossible to get most of the classics due to zoomers buying them up and cranking up the costs.
If you want cheap stuff for less than "market value" then don't buy from camera companies or resellers. It is really easy to get things for way less than what they charge, but if you absolutely have to have some sort of specific thing and have a reassurance that everything is top notch then good luck. I'm getting tonnes of cheap stuff by looking at the newest listings in my local market place and buying things in lots. Buy stuff, sell excess crap that you don't want, use your photographic experience to take better photos than the normies you bought it from, sell to some hipster who want said piece of equipment, for a more established market price, rinse and repeat a couple of times and you are able to purchase the hyped crap you want without anything spent other than some of your time.
>>4527035That's what you previsualized; show some actual good pics you took (you can't)
>>4534236Dang bro man, did it really take you over a month to come up with that one?
>>4534239I am NTA akchually.Sugar is a fag and shall always be considered as such
>>4526817This but unironically. If you buy a camera because of instagram hype you need to kys immediately
Trichromatic edition (strong filters are better for color according to PhaseONE, Kasson is WRONG)https://youtube.com/watch?v=HHM-vp9lWkkPrevious national tragedy thread: >>4532911
>>4534218The actual reason is that the Kolari filter isn't for cameras with IBIS but nice try
>>4534193>self-hating canon user has a melty over getting called a canon fanboylove to see it k3kplease do some more self-flagellation
>>4533739>Sony colors are the bestWhen was the last time you saw a serious portraiture pro use a Sony? Oh right, they don't. Journalists use Sony for good autofocus, burst shooting, and the fact that they're quintessential beater cameras. Journalists don't give a shit about color accuracy or artistic interpretation because the images go straight to JPG and to the editorial office within minutes.>>4533751This is probably the most important reason. Sony reportedly has good bulk enterprise offers.
>>4534409>When was the last time you saw a serious portraiture pro use a Sony?Portraits are so edited to fuck that any of the brands will suffice. Shit they're more than good enough for almost any type of photography outside of scientific stuff. It doesn't matter who is the best or who is the worst because 1, they're very close, and 2 most professional work is going to be edited and you can get near enough the exact same look with any of them. All you can argue over is jpegs, some brands do have greater and easier controls for modifying how they will look in camera but none of them are terrible.
>>4534249It's a sensitive subject
Can someone tell me what lightning equipment I would need, to recreate either of those photos?
>>4504097lmao
>>4491585Do you think, the people who made those statues, thought about how these statues should be lit, even in ancient times or did this kind of thinking only originate during the times of realism for painting?
>>4504089Fernandel by Philippe Halsman
>>4523698Such a shame, such well rounded compositions are basically non existent with modern photographs anymore.
>>4504097ha!
Insta and whatever else thread for wherever anons post their photos.https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/Do any of you tend to go for certain themes and styles? Or just try anything?
>>4533480>being ironicAt what age were you diagnosed anon
>>4533467>forcing your hobby all the time on friends and family
>>4533577>forcingNigga I emplore you to develop natural relationships with other human beings that involves having a respect and cursory interest in each other's lives. You are not required to be a sperging faggot about a hobby in order to expect a basic level of input and appreciation from the people who care about you. I don't give the slightest fuck about cross-stitching personally, and I still engage with my friend who does it because that's what decent friends do.
what's the appeal of Instagram? It's about presenting photos yet the photo quality is very bad and the website UI sucks ass
>>4533851Social aspects. I would say it heavily depends on what type of photography you engage with, more artistic ones are fine (or better) without it, but when I was doing cosplay/conventions photos, almost everyone expected IG account and once I made one, it resulted in large increase of people actually watching them, sharing and visiting my site, where I upload full galleries. But if you take IG social part out, it's absolutely awful place for photography - no real control over proportions (in carousels it even take proportion of first photo in group, cutting the rest - something I learned only after some time, to my eternal embarrassment), rescaling, little to no control after upload and so on. I treat it as communication front and it works quite good that way.Unfortunately, there is nothing else on horizon that would take over its place. Yes, I know about Flickr, there are emerging projects like cos.place but as long as "normal people" cling to IG, its here to stay.
