lemme see your shots for the moon!this is mine btw captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settingsi gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
>>4480835
cheesy moon tonight
yet another shot of the beaver moon. I am >>4464392this anon. same setup.
Was gonna shoot this bastard rising over the lake but couldn't make it out of the office in time, fuck me.
Fuji X-T4 // 500mm TTArtisan f6.31/60s~f9 (it isn't registered in the EXIF, el cheapo very manual Chinese lens) ISO160
Hello /p/, I want to take photos like picrel but have no experience in photography and no camera, I'm willing to spend up to around €1,000 but would rather cheaper as I am not wealthy, anything in the 400-500 range is a nice amount for me. What camera/specs do I need? Any lenses? I know photography terminology as I've experience with 3dcg and they seem to use the same terms there, as well as a bit of experience in just using the pro mode of my phone camera.
>>4474415The Butlerian Jihad will be developed in caffenol, mark my words AI
>>4461548You need a high red camera like the Sony A7CR, paired with a sharp GM lens. If your subject is trees, leaves, or anything green in general, Sony is the natural choice because of their propensity for beautiful green hues in their jpgs.
>>4474264you need to stay in better hotels nona
>>4474338I'm a Nikon Z (luv me fool frame look) and M43 (luv me portability) shooter myself but you need to take your meds, holy shit
>>4474350because autistically focusing on the mechanism and technique allows you to distract yourself from the fact that you're just not that into her
Thread theme: https://youtu.be/QR75ti4mN_A?si=N-UtB79FhGkJOuBO
>>4482043
>>4482044
>>4482045
>>4482046This is the last one. Feedback is much appreciated. It was my 2nd time at the track
>>4482048LMP2 HYPE
Summer's over, did you get shit done? editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4450377Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I just watched the latest Marty Supreme trailer. It's good. But fuck if it doesn't feel like an ode to every struggling artist out there running off sheer arrogance and willpower to try and achieve something that feels impossible.
>>4481959Markus is the realest video-related youtuber out there.
>>4482055What took up some time on that shoot was not having a rocksolid definitive lighting plan already designed and locked down. We had a ballpark idea of how we wanted it to look, and wanted to keep a light gameplan that was open to on-the-spot changes and new ideas- but if we had drawn up atleast a fallback lighting design for each and every shot, it would’ve ended up saving a ton of time and energy. Lesson learned. Plan everything- even the stuff you potentially want to have as “spontaneous on the day open collaboration”.
>>4481280Send me a link, I watch it on my 4k monitor on my windows pc.
Bump limit reached. New thread>>4482295
2025 Halloween in Itaewon and Hongdae, Korea10/31~11/1Out of focus edition1/100And if you have some from the halloween you would like to share, please do.
>>4481965>i know you felt smug by saying thisI know you needed to imagine my feewings when I wrote that to feed into your idea of who you think you're fighting against, but you're a fucking loser on the internet and the only feeling I have for any of you morons is indifference. When you all wake up to your farms and suburbs reduced to ash and choke on the poison in the air, it'll be directly from your own stupidity and assholishness. Democracies get what they deserve eventually.>let me tell you about my super special thoughts on the first civil war and racism>wall of textdude nobody's reading that, jfc
>>4481969>shut up you're stupid>nobody cares>i am right. the racists side is STUPID AND DUMB and the non-racists actually contribute and are smart!ok propaganda slave but if you look closely they are the same fucking people and you are spitting out an ancient bush era propaganda line like you just walked out of 2006. the racists have a lot of the upper class with them now. it's no longer everyone with a college degree vs working class and hasn't been for a while. their only crime was noticing the slave owners (better known as billionaires) keep importing low IQ people because they are easier to control and ask for less in return.there is the little war you are obsessed withand then there is the big one, which is the actual repeat of the civil wara cabal of jews and their chosen few want to own slaveseveryone else is sick of thatthe slavery method has merely changed from letting everyone own a member of a very low IQ race, to making everyone the same moderately lower IQ race via replacement migration with moderately more freedom than the prior slaves. no matter what the end goal is basing a nation off some form of a brown skinned, lower IQ races slavery to a racially defined upper class (that is predominantly ashkenazi jewish). whether it's north vs south, or coasts and great lakes states vs. inland.america has actually always been defined by this conflict. it is so much the same... that back then, lincoln's master plan was deporting most of the slaves and only keeping the ones that could contribute something. and today, people still want to deport the slaves so much they will agree with anyone who pretends to.
>>4481969PS: what do you call an illegal immigrant, really?they are not a citizenthey do not have the same rights as a citizenthey do not have the same protections as a citizentheir labor is extremely cheap and it can easily cost less than it would just to feed and house themoh yes, that's a slave. but actually cheaper than a slave, because they can just pay them less than the value of feeding and housing (aka living wage) and let them "decide" to live in the same shack somewhere or be homeless.>but they can buy their way out of slavery! in theory!common.the US was literally founded on slavery (predominantly financed by jews) from day one. a war tried to stop that and failed. it only disrupted the slavery and forced it to take on a new form that was not explicitly called slavery. the country was basically kickstarted by jewish investors and the jewish owned slave trade, and jewish owned businesses that used slave labor to outcompete everyone else in america (hey does that sound familiar?)they even have overseas slaves nowComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4481974>>4481972>>4481965Go home Vance you’re drunk
>>4480240this one would have been sweet if you'd hit focus
How do you sell a photo for over a million dollars?
>>4476693Roll it up, smear a little butter on it, push it up Cindy Crawford sweaty anus, pull it out and put it up for auction.I mean am i wrong? I think not.
>>4479436im literally just saying i aesthetically enjoy Big burt more and i dont really care for the message
>>4476693Take a bunch of pictures of black and indigenous women and self-publish a photobook called "Documenting Bodies and Spaces" and go on a speaking tour at universities big and small all over the country.
>>4479897I'm saying and that's why he isn't selling million dollar photographs like Huge Gherkin Gursky
>>4476693>Take photo>Sell it for a million dollars
It's pretty good
>>4479162he’s the good guy, forced to be bad. he desperately wants to tack "-just fuck california and brown people" onto every policy but can’t because muh heckin rights n sheeit
>>4478347Agreed. New photo is so bad why did he go along with it?
>>4473154>depressing colors, looks like a cadaver>shit flash light positioning>kitch toneh
>>4479174He's the furthest thing from a good person
>>4473120Why would everything need to be in focus like a m43 photo?
Third rate editionLast >>4478535
>>4481945>Sony is indeed the white's man gear
>>4481963You are probably right, but from my searching on completed listings on ebay I do often see things things in Australia sell for below international averages.
>>4481956>What was it?Canon 5D classic auction. Got it for $140 AUD when they go for about double that normally. Dumbass set the auction timeout for 3:30am local time so it was relatively easy to snipe it at the end as I'm a shift worker.>>4481958Negative, what >>4481963 wrote is accurate. Boomers cant fathom the idea that their 20 year old e-waste didnt appreciate in value at the same rate as their shitty fibro house in Western Sydney. There's a follow-on effect where the local shops and gen Z-tards will also list their stuff at about the same rate thinking that's still a good deal, so when you offer or expect a more reasonable amount sellers immediately assume you're trying to rip them off.Unfortunately since they usually use it twice and shelf it they're normally the items in best condition. I legitimately could find better deals buying from the US if there wasn't $100 in shipping tacked on. My best deals are normally through charities upcycling and at least I know my money is going to a decent cause.
>>4481598Yes! Dogs in cars. This is what I love.
>>4481019This. The only people seething about others' success are the same people who are easily replaced with AI.
What is HDR in files? Can I export any RAWs as HDR in RawTherapee? Or do I need a special camera that captures extra data in the RAW? Do you use this?
>>4481635I don't have one any more as my trusted source Christian Bloch has basically taken down his website a few years ago, but he has written a bookhttps://books.google.com.bd/books?id=bju4BAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=falseUnfortunately most HDRI tutorials on youtube are made by boomers and retards who don't understand what happens under the hood or companies trying to sell their HDR software, so they're not very informative. They completely skip over what HDR is, how it's done and what it brings, they don't even show the 32-bit images and how they can basically retain details in a much wider range of exposures. They don't explain what tone-mapping to either and why it's needed. These are relatively old techniques which were a hot research topic 20-30 years ago, but you can still find new papers on the topic with new algorithms. If you're interested just read up the wikipedia article on tone mapping. In any case nowadays camera sensors have improved a lot in terms of dynamic range, so that HDR isn't needed as often as it was 20 years ago.
>>4481661Sounds like it's not that relevant to the real world then
>>4481671Why?
>>4472971There are a couple parts here1. Absolute white point/max brightness. This should be up to the user. If you want the display brighter, up the brightness. If you want it dimmer lower the brightness. Random websites should not be able to override your brightness setting.2. Tone curve. This should come from the profile embedded in the image. If you don't like the sRGB gamma just supply your own, all the common formats allow embedded profiles.3. Bit depth. More bits improve quality, whether it is noticeable depends on the image. JPEG supports 12-bit, PNG supports 16-bit, this is nothing new.In summary there is no need for some Apple-specific format as all this shit has been around for decades.
>>4481741>Random websites should not be able to override your brightness setting.They don't. HDR has both an "SDR White" and a "Max HDR Brightness", which you can control. Unlike SDR, where the baseline is established at the highest signal level, HDR establishes its baseline lower down the signal curve. HDR is supposed to provide headroom for brighter elements like specular highlights and emissive elements, not simply "brighten" an image wholescale.
Should wild subjects have privacy?
>>4481665Do they want it?(uploading files in incognito mode is not allowed.jpg)
>>4481735
>>4481735>(uploading files in incognito mode is not allowed.jpg)Works on my machine.
>>4481665Best thread on /p/ right now Greatest question of the century in photography.
This is one of the reasons why I appreciate photographing insects. People care a lot less. There's like a million of them.When we have like 4 owls in that one patch of woods and there's 50 photographers going after it (exaggeration) I can see where the issues start. So much attention will disrupt their lifecycle. And when there's so few individuals...
Random photos you took at night
>>4473945>>4478719What camera and lens?
>>4477889>>4477955Only this one could be called Lynchian, it’s very reminiscent of Inland Empire. The rest are just “noir” and there’s really nothing “Lynchian” about them in particular unless David Lynch invented moody night time photography. Do you need me to tell you he didn’t?
>>4481539Thanks, though I don't consider it particularly great, I liked the scene well enough to take it. Fits the idea of the thread.>>4481540The first one is canon r7 + sugma 23 1.4
>>4473836I just needed to finish the roll but I like it
Recently got a camera without a light meter, looking for some tips on how to meter by eye.I get the principle behind sunny 16, and have the table in my head, but I'm constantly getting different readings from my (phone) light meter than I'm getting from my guesses using sunny 16. Is it just practice?
>>4481794examples here are 1/60th 6400 with a 40mm equivalent lens
uooo... oh wait, misread the thread titlecarry on
>>4481795Works the same (or even better) on film
>>4481797Rember to push your Tri-X, it's fun
>>4481798And it works
I like the aesthetics of tobbaco, zippos and leather
>>4478921Anon... What do you think Latinx means
i like these too
>>4473779Might wanna look into whiskey as well, there's a lot of beauty in reflection/refraction of liquids through glass.
>>4481622Any drink with real wormwood is better than Jagermeister
>>4473779No guns and cowboys? Disappointed >>4473782>>4474584>>4473885>>4473781>White trash >gay >underage Can you muricans enlighten me what's wrong with the photo? Because I love this wild cowboy/Appalachia aesthetic.
I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire. Which one are you hoping to score?You are going to be getting one right /p/?You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
>>4470323I can't listen to that guy for more than a minute, tops. I wonder if he always talks in this extremely retarded way or if he fakes it for his channel.
>>4481684So this is a fashion accessory that happens to take shit photos. Very woman like, fitting.
>>4481637>>4481638>no viewfinder
>>4481694Most of the people buying it already have a camera, give it a rest.
>>4481638Hah I saw these on sale at Best Buy for $15 CAD last week. These Vivitars are much worse than the Charmera, sadly. The native resolution on the Vivitar is 320x240, upscaled to 14MP. At least the Charmera has an honest resolution of 1.6MP (1440x1080).
How many of you shoot in manual mode and / or live mode? You can't take masterpieces without them. I finally feel like a proper photographer.
>>4481442Average pentax fan
>>4481442>he bought the battery grip and a D FA* lensspared no expense eh chap?
>>4481717>a D FA* lensno, threeI should retake the family photo, have another 120 camera and significantly more lenses for the Bronica now
>>4481725>no 43/1.9anon pls, if your'e going to be a pentax chud that lens is a must have.
>>4481726I mean it's not like I'm collecting lenses for fun, everything I have fits a specific need and I use them all frequentlyI simply have no need for any of the limiteds that isn't covered by what I have already
