why do stock photos always have this ugly neutral, super low contrast look? does it have a name? I call it the 'unsplash look', but I don't know why this is so popular. it looks cheap and it is not eye-catching at all.
>>4524460That's what poorly exposed/developed film looks like. Mirrorlesscucks are basically ferrets, they have a tendency to collect trash.
>>4523808>Backlit>Obvious flare>Poor lightingThe photographers are shit. That's your common denominator.
>>4523808Because this>Bro my camera has uhhh dynamic range look at this chart it's 0.8 better at dynamic range>*drags shadow slider up*>full frame is for low light bro why even buy it if you're not gonna shoot at f2 iso 12800 or push shadows 6 stops>*e/c -2*
>>4523810>canon cock deep in the mouth
>>4523808You just know...
What are your favorite modern photographers that you follow on insta, flickr, blogs? I want to follow some more work of others but all the popular ones that come up always are those influencer promoting their gear that they change every month. Many years ago I really liked Takashi Yasui's photos but damn they aged badly.
>>4525741lol what are you talking about what did he do besides post neat pics and vids?
>>4524993>What are your favorite modern photographers that you follow on instagoth whores with huge tits
>>4525049holy fuck that's some pretentious photoslop
>>4525890How'd you get them to follow you?
>>4525891this. fucking cringed lol
https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kRk7rgo
>>4524104Ah, a pentax Q enjoyer.
>>4524123kek, obviously Pentax Q is what I meant :^)>http://www.photocritic.org/articles/pentax-q-s1-announcement>Is the new Pentax Q-S1 all fur coat and no knickers?
So I guess no one wants to participate and this was all for nothing? If so I'll let the thread die!
>>4526045I don't get what this thread is even meant to be.Why would anyone enter as the hacker known as four chan, instead of under their own bame?
>>4526045Didn't even realize it was here, i swear i never saw it in the catalogue
>>4524969nikon is the white man's camera - they take it to the mooncanon shoots niggerballpoetic
>>4503460>>4503843>>4503844>>4504020Taken on gopros btw
>>4503341They also approved omega watches "swiss" (actually chinese) made. I laughed when I saw the vid of the astronaut having to repair his own fucking watch in space because omega is fucking shit.
>>4525856your mother is fucking shit fucking rolex nigger
>>4507655That's exactly what I have. It'll be a major upgrade from an old APS-C DSLR in every way, most notably in terms of high ISO performance and IBIS. Also the 24-120mm is a great lens. I would recommend that you purchase the 40mm f/2 in addition to it. Those two combined are the perfect travel combo. Buy the 50mm f/1.8 S if you fancy having an exceptionally sharp lens.
Do you consider political portraiture as art?
of course. why wouldnt i?
Yeah why not for example the Che guevara photograph , That had been sold for millions of time now.
>>4526054Playing little hitler with what is and isn't art is a very exhausting and ultimately unwinnable task.
>>4526054Propaganda and advertising are forms of applied art. Including political photography. So yes.
does he still hold up in 2026?
>>4523841J in JEW is for JPEG
>>4525889What's the EW for?
>>4525933The average reaction to seeing a Jew
>>4525889JPEG stands for Jewish Plan to Exterminate Goyim
>>4525889JEWPEGGED
I am going to post random images I made which I have also edited and I would love my /p/iss bros to give me feedback on my composition, but mostly editing style... or direct me towards an editing style that would fit me.>feedback on composition>feedback on editing>direct my towards my own styleStarting with opening image...
>>4502387I made this picture better. I think I improved a little also in my editing skills.
>>4519436Here something new on my travels. Since then I feel like I have taken enough photos and have been chilling since. Photo gear is collecting dust. Want to travel again, this time to northern Poland or even Prag (in August). Still unsure, due to the temperature, which just takes the fun out of sight seeing.(pic related taken on same Island)
>>4519438
bump
A photograph is simply a photon's recorded wave function. It ripples through spacetime and is possible due to it being electromagnetic fields. Digital cameras treat its fields like a solar panel would. Why it act like this is in order for a photon to get its wave function quantization exist. So all in all it is just the energy of quantization. Possible due to the mathematical nature of the universe. And all of this photography is possible because a photon's wave function can be accumulated enough to be recorded. The joke I make about this is that it is like engineering an image from how a camera is exposed to the scene it sees from the ripples of light.
if you take pic in dark do you see heartbeat if processed enough
Light also is a dynamic form of energy not a certain movement which goes back to what I say of it being a wave function.
>>4526026Hey zach would you want to be a judge in the upcoming /p/ photo contest? There will be a real prize at stake, so we need the very best judges that this place has to offer.
>>4526028I got work to get to most of the week and I need to take care of some car troubles. Most importantly I still am an amateur with a camera.
>>4526029Not sure when the photo contest is. You would merely vote on your top three from all the entries, most likely. It would not be a huge time commitment. We just need people from all walks of life to judge. You are an ideal candidate.
Any of you use an 8x10 before? Is it as cozy as it seems.
Honestly, no. 5x7 is the point where you still have portability and more lens options, 8x10 goes in the little too big, little too heavy, little too cumbersome territory. 8x10 negatives are beautiful and working with them is fun but the camera itself is honestly PITA.
>>4525774Eh but then you're insanely limited on film. Might as well go for broke and just go 4x5 and 8x10. Lens selection is not too bad for 8x10, but they do get BIG and expensive very very quickly. Process lenses are relatively inexpensive and usually cover 8x10 but they usually need an external shutter.You can also get a convertible lens and they can have 3 seperate focal lengths for the size of one.
>>4525834True but Ilford and Foma have 5x7 covered for B&W and for colour I just buy roll from chinks and cut sheets myself because fuck both Fuji and Kodak sheet prices.
>>4525871Where are you getting c41 large format rolls from? I have been wanting a cheap color negative for 8x10
>>4525951You can get roll of Shenguang (old Shanghai C41 emulsion) from Taobao sometimes, you just have to be lucky and patient since they don't really produce enough of it. It comes down to like 60 cents per sheet once cut which is still a steal compared to every other option.
So when are we doing this again?
>>4523171I guess he doesn't like it when someone has insight about women that he does not.
>>4509217:drools:moar
L O N D O NONDON
>>4509217This real or AI?
>>4523250>someone has insight about women>4chan camera autists
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women?99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
OP isnt trying
>>4517018>Once you have a portfolio it is much easier to find TFP models.what if you use AI to fake a portfolio
Any excuse good enough to spam beauty
>>4525685
>>4481289jews
Only A Gameboy Camera Is Good Enough™Previously: >>4524132
>>4525979>Mfw I'm in a misinformation competition and my opponent is Huskyfag
>>4525976I’m not gonna waste my time if you cant even use your own photo>>4525980>aka cANON aka tom aka Q aka yair netanyahu
New norwood V containment colony>>4525985
>>4525984>I can't fix the moireI know.
Anyone try this yet?
Eclipse editionFormer thread: >>4519819Took this one in Paris as the eclipse was winding down. Spanishbros, post your eclipse pics.
Ok I post another crappy photo and we can all move to a new thread.
>>4525694>new thread didn't happenit's over for /rpt/
>>45257472 more weeks
>>4525747If you have a recent photo you should be the change you want to be in this world instead of waiting for someone else to do it.
>>4525776>>4525747migrate>>4525845
I took this photo with a friend of mine as a souvenir but like there's something I did wrong and that this photo doesn't look very good to me, do you have any other tips on what I can improve in this photo /p/?
>>4525715well it's all blurry because the camera is too bad at focusing and resolving detail in low light, and there's no subject so it's just some kind of empty void
>>4525715put it on a tripod and expose it for 30 seconds
>>4525799OP here I liked this model it even looks like an album model
does anyone take photos of abandoned buildings ?
>>4525606These sorta count, I guess.
>>4525606Most of the abandoned factories hoses etc in my city got demolished and the remaining ones got big fences and sensors, cameras that will alert security.
