>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scansAHHHHHHHHH
>>4411869Flirt with the woman in snappy snaps and get free photos for life lilenindid. Even got the panoramic prints on their expensive paper. Wish I was a photographer and not just fuckjng about with a camera cause im dating a woman who works in a photo shop.
>>4431490>post is 365 days oldLmfao dead boars
>>4512273lucky. i only ever see old boomers work in photo shops.
>>4512336Well, snappy snaps was a new company back then
>>4512336The one I go to always has a rotating cast of young women and enbies that are presumably also doing a film or photography program at the community college across the street.
Hello /p/I saved a RX100 M7 from the bin after customer returned it without it's box and accessories.I know it’s not a pro camera with fancy lenses and such, but is it good? Photography interests me but I never mustered the motivation to buy a nice setup. Do you have any recommendations on what to do / not do?
>>4510720iPhone 17
>>4510613>Canon has a green tint nowdpreview really is retarded
>>4505220It has more glass and bigger sensor than a smartphone. Smartphones uses algo and ai to molest the picture to look half decent.
>>4505220Not even close, it's a lot better than a smartphone and even a shitty compact camera from a decade ago manages that. Most phones max out at 12mp and still have a lot of processing junk, so even those ones that claim to be more than 12mp are just using pixel binning to achieve a higher mp amount. OP could buy a Canon Powershot from the early 2010s and still be better off than using his phone.
>>4505391>iso 1600hmm I wonder why you didn't chose base iso for both cameras as a point of comparison
>>4503361Samsung galaxy s23 why?
>>4503425Umm, why is the suns light not anywhere? Also, 58 day old post? Lmao dead board
>>4512272The sun is occluded by earth.
>>4512194adobe damage control hard at work
>>4512194kek
The camera fairy appears! She is willing to conjure a camera plus lenses of your choice... BUT all your future photos are limited to a single aspect ratio. If you try to change the ratio in any way, she WILL strangle you in your sleep.What is your choice and what do you wish for?
How about round, snap like it's 1888 without caring of tilted horizon or fuzzy corners.
>>4508570I shoot/export exclusively in 16:9.Every other ratio belongs in the trash.
>>4512048>Every other ratio belongs in the trash.16:9 is literally a cope ratio for retards and engineers who rushed it before reaching the stated goal for 16:10, the Golden Ratio
>>4512050>16:10, the Golden RatioThe golden ratio isn't 16:10 though so that's just another cope ratio.
>>4512157>The golden ratio isn't 16:10 thoughIt's close enough to 1618:1000, it would be silly to enforce the latter in display hardware terms
Sony will save us editionPreviously on /p/ee: >>4509022
NiKEK>>4512168
>>4512125Trade ins net ~30% of resale on average. You’d get a bit over 80% of your gears value just putting it on ebay and undercutting all the japanese reseller scum.
>>4511463You waited how long for 6 more megapixels?
>>4512014>Entry Level PentaxesK1s tear the flash mount off very easily because the Pentaprism has a GPS unit above it. If it was all metal it would interfere. https://www.ebay.com/itm/178207641525That said here's a K1 for $500 for bid, not bad re: lenses has the 150-500mm Sigma Tele, 15mm Irix Prime, and Tokina 28-80mm f2.8 Pro. I'm personally wanting a 28-105mm f3.5-5.6 HD WR K1 kit lens for my K1ii
found a local seller with a Sony NEX-5N kit with an 18-55 and 55-210 and extras. worth it for $250?
Does anyone have advice regarding a card reader not reading a micro sd card?For more context, it was delivered by mail and seems like it may have been dropped (an ever so slight bump/rise to it)Local data recovery place is quoting anywhere from 800 to 2gs, which is simply out of the question due to a lack of funds.
>>4511949Flash memory is pretty resistant to physical damage as long as the chips themselves weren't cracked, and the electrical contacts of the card aren't completely sandblasted off. SD cards WILL (not might, WILL) fail anywhere between 6 months and 5 years into their used lifespan under normal circumstances, so if your card is cheap and shit you might be SoL.Seeing as you're talking about data recovery, I'm guessing this was something that had photos on it that you sent away? If I were you I'd spend the $10 on a new SD card reader to rule that out as the culprit as there are many out-of-spec and chingneseum readers that will just fail because the ambient sea level pressure rose 1.3 kPa.I've also had an amazon-tier card reader fail to read my beefier UHS-II spec cards despite the fact they're just supposed to fall back to the highest supported speed.Buy a new reader and report back OP.
>>4511965Thanks! Will do.
buy an ad.
Show me your shitty artsy bullshit, bring out your Holgas, bring out your LensBabys, bring out your bullshit where your focus is ass and your framing is tainted
>>4509754Truly tones you can't achieve on 35mm.
>>4510046Nice shot
Stomped on a fuzzy snap of lichen on a dead spruce until it stopped squirming.
Photo abusement thread, nice!
Please apply a dithering effect to one of your recent photos using this tool and post the result ITT if you don't mind: https://grainrad.com/
>>4499645Roger that. Was fun, I like this result. Original is in macro thread.
>>4499674Awesome result! >>4503325Neat, like old Indy DOS adventures
Failed to read instructions.
This thread is driving me nuts. I can't get the tool to work. Possibly a Linux issue.
I have some photos taken under tree shade with spots of light that I took with the intention of editing in the style of Monet's soft, cool shade-light contrast but I'm having a hard time nailing the post, any pointers?
post raws
>>4511640shoot raw and bracket with a tripod. thats it
Man, Myth, Legend
here is a fuckin bush
>>4511468is that your go to line still ??shit worked well here 15yrs agocool old school
the fuck happened in here>>4511439>>4511462just because you disagree, or don't understand it, doesn't make it trollinghere, I took the time to illustrate what I'm talking about: registration error in the plate cassetteunfortunately the image limit is reached, so have a catbox link: https://files.catbox.moe/hypoht.png
>>4511609I apologise to you.I am currently maintaining multiple active threads here and other places. Grief posters and bots are almost all that remain.Grammar Nazi shows up to egg shit on >>4511468as an example.Your Diagram took a lot of time. It was very well done.The RGB overlap was also odd and you showed how they stack in the finished crop. Bottom portion left is spot on.Ya done good Friend. Very Nice. And yes, words did not work here.I was always a tactile learner.In my own defence I did honestly engage in the previous posts we madeComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4511609>>4511641the next thread will take some timeneed to afkfor obvious reasons
2nd Tour
>>4511532that dude in the center background scares me. Looks like he has his hand behind his back like he's about to cap yo ass.Cool photos though. thanks for sharing. I hear Vietnam today is an expat paradise. they didn't carry the anger into the 21st century
Go /p/ro.>Want:• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread.>Do Not Want: • Go to >>>/wsr/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki - http://archive.today/15tYK
>>4510835The guy who fucking started this mutant deformed dog breed i hope he suffers in hell. The only gs that should be accepted should be working gsd, the ones that look like normal dogs not the ones with fucked up back legs.
>>4511142Spends tens of thousands £ on gear, still stars ave angel wings in the corners. Thanks for stopping me in searching for a better milky way lens
>>4511151Sorry I lied. I only took that pic a little over 2 years ago.>>4511256That was taken with a graflex xlsw with the old style 47mm super angulon and horseman 6x9 back. Super fun and simple camera that costs under a grand. The dust was free. :D
>>4511260>>4511168I was never complimenting the terrible practice photos you took of your mutt. The two egg photos you posted ITT are the only good photos you have ever posted here. Everything else has been pretty garbage, every bit as bad your husky owning alter ego’s landscapes.
>>4511271>schizo nophoto has shit taste in dogtography.Thank you for the compliments, angry lil guy. If you post some exceptional work, like I have, I would love to return the favor and give you some big props as well. :)
In April/May I went to China to my brother’s wedding and took a bunch of photos there. Since I’ve got a lot of photographs, I was thinking about getting some feedback as I’m trying to improve and got that feeling that I’m stuck. My photos doesn’t have a well defined style, so the compositions and color grade floats a lot.
>>4509819may I ask what do you use for shooting?
>>4511178I miss exif.
>>4509953>>4509828>>4509952These are really cool!
I'd try simplifying things and exclude more
>>4510294>>4510480>>4511223Thanks! I’m glad that you liked >>4511178Sure, I’m using the Canon R8, most of my photos were with the RF 100mm f2.8 and the RF 70-200 f4. For the wide angles, I’ve used the RF 16mm. >>4511241It came out pretty nice also, it gave the dog more emphasis.
