[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


New anti-spam measures have been applied to all boards.

Please see the Frequently Asked Questions page for details.

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: Eric Kim.jpg (150 KB, 1096x812)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
>https://youtu.be/J9vI79uflMY
APOLOGIZE.
14 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4367962
>nope. just go out and take pictures
You make it sound like they take pictures often
Pro-tip: They don't
>>
>>4367903
holy shit i actually remember when kim was relevant
>>
>>4367903
that video fully swayed my opinion 180 degrees on street photography
fucking hell that's hard to watch
>>
>>4367903
>Street Photography IS Art
yeah
performance art
>>
>>4367903
>Street Photography IS Art
i think you hand must of slips while typing that you must have meant to say Street Photography IS Gay

Why do you hate street photography even though it's the most impressive style of photography?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Width1500
Image Height995
109 replies and 23 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4374653
>posts no u
eat shit nigga
>>
taking pictures of distinct cultures would be interesting. now you're just taking photos of tourists and the unwashed masses of immigrants from random places in every major city.
>>
File: DSCN7684_s.jpg (372 KB, 1920x1440)
372 KB
372 KB JPG
>>4353864
I don't hate street photography. To me it is just another thing I do not follow and care about.
>>
>>4374652
an undeniably great photo
>>
>>4353864
because im nervous

File: 28years.jpg (35 KB, 640x480)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
I think it looks awful, personally.

Should've used a DJI Pocket 3.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuxssP9vSGY
25 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
tm?
>>
File: george_shiggy_diggy_.png (95 KB, 289x430)
95 KB
95 KB PNG
>>4362793
Why did they make his face look like that?
>>
>>4362793
Yeah because it's not the actual trailer. You suck.
>>
>>4362793
>I think it looks awful, personally.
yeah, tm sucks and keeps missing the mark
not a good look
>>
>>4376509
you missed 3. check all the threads. i have them well hidden.

File: IMG_20240708_134120.jpg (4.37 MB, 2296x4080)
4.37 MB
4.37 MB JPG
write something good please

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Modelvivo Y100
Equipment Makevivo
Camera SoftwareAndroid Gallery
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2296
Image Height4080
Image OrientationUnknown
Image Created2024:07:06 16:16:57
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Bias0 EV
Focal Length4.05 mm
Exposure Time1/50 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/1.8
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4376106
Something good
>>
nice photo!
>>
>>4376106
>write something good please
It's in focus and the sky isn't completely blown out.
>The lighting is flat
>The shutter speed is neither fast enough to freeze the water nor slow enough to flatten it. which has a vibe like you accidentally pressed the shutter
>It's overly sharpened
I think you could improve it by making it black and white, it's basically monochrome as it is, you might as well fully commit
>>
>>4376106
It's a good start. It's like the sort of photo a first semester photography student would capture -- someone that's actually starting to give some thought to their photography and has potential to get good.

Choose a better shutter speed. This isn't fast enough to freeze the water, or slow enough to smooth the water out. It's at an awkward in-between that just makes it look like a thoughtless snapshot.

Choose a better time to take the photo. The sky and lighting make it look flat. Come back here during a day with "dramatic clouds" during sunset or sunrise (whichever shines the most light onto the scene).

Composition could be improved. The natural subject here is the waterfall, but it's too far to the lower right -- the photo has a lack of balance. The line between the mountain and the sky also presents a strong geometric shape that "frames" the photo, exaggerating the lack of balance. Try to either avoid the potential for this sort of framing, or utilize it to effect (which I don't think is very possible for this kind of photo unless you want to get abstract).

I would like to see more intrigue in the foreground. Try a wider angle lens, get close to the ground, and letting that log or an interesting rock dominate the foreground.

Learn to use curves in post-processing to enhance contrast and control the tonal value of lighting.

Keep at it op and you can get good.
>>
>>4376106
Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ forgives the sins of all those who come to Him.

File: IMG_3817.jpg (32 KB, 225x225)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
Have not been on Insta for ages, recently went back on and decided to look up all the photographers I use to follow. They have all quit, some have taken up a totally diff hobby and converted their page to being about that.
Did everybody move to tik tok?
What has happened?
I tried the search but half the results were video clips and then it was mainly posts from months ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width225
Image Height225
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4376457
Nobody cares about photos. If you want to be a photography influencer, the only option is to make videos about gear on youtube. No body wants to look at your photos, unless your photos are porn.
>>
>>4376462

Why would anybody want to watch video about gear if nobody wants to see photos taken with the gear?
Or you mean gear for tik tok and videos?

File: IMG_1492.jpg (83 KB, 510x680)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
Hello My a6000 after years of use finally gave out. The shutter mechanism jammed shut.

I am looking for a compact camera to purchase under $400. I know that’s really low of a budget but I’m a brokie.

I was looking at the Sony Zv-1f, a Richo GX200 And sure it’s a downgrade potentially from the a6000 I just wish i could find something like a RX100 with a view finder. I was wondering if there was any good daily camera to bring in my sling that won’t be heavy. I ended up with pain on my shoulder because of heavy cameras

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width510
Image Height680
Scene Capture TypeStandard
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4371659
Yeah i was wondering if going m4/3 is worth it. I was thinking of the 1.7f 20mm. With the exact camera you mentioned, or a Panasonic GX1
>>
>>4371688
butthurt
>>
>>4371580
You already have lenses so just buy a 6400

They're 400-500 dollars used
>>
>>4371580
Pannyboy GX80 and the 20mm 1.7
Next question
>>
>>4376080
>>4371689
Are you particularly attached to your lenses? While it does make sense to buy another Sony on paper, it really only makes sense if you actively like the lenses you have. If not, this could be a great chance to try something new.

>I am looking for a compact camera to purchase under $400
Pentax k5 - $200
Nikon d700 - $300
Canon 5d mkiii -$250

Kinda depends on your definition of "compact" but lots of good options out there

File: DSCF6667_dt.jpg (2.93 MB, 4935x3295)
2.93 MB
2.93 MB JPG
Let's see some nice pictures of mountains, or pictures taken while hiking or climbing on mountains.

Also, critique my shitty picture.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera Softwaredarktable 3.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:09:14 07:54:31
Exposure Time1/220 sec
F-Numberf/3.2
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/3.2
Brightness4.1 EV
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length20.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4935
Image Height3295
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessUnknown
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationUnknown
Flash ModeUnknown
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeAperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK
158 replies and 97 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: mountain.jpg (165 KB, 1000x666)
165 KB
165 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6100
Camera SoftwareCapture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Brightness6.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Image Width4857
Image Height3238
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: mountain3.jpg (223 KB, 1000x666)
223 KB
223 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6100
Camera SoftwareCapture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness9.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Image Width5854
Image Height3902
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: mountain4.jpg (270 KB, 1000x666)
270 KB
270 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6100
Camera SoftwareCapture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Brightness10.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: mountain5.jpg (202 KB, 1000x666)
202 KB
202 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6100
Camera SoftwareCapture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)48 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness9.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length32.00 mm
Image Width5662
Image Height3775
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: mountain6.jpg (219 KB, 1000x666)
219 KB
219 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6100
Camera SoftwareCapture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Brightness10.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Image Width5879
Image Height3920
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: images.jpg (5 KB, 275x183)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
Will I enjoy the Canon 5d as a film shooter? Watching a few videos and looking at sample images it seems okay. I like the more limited dynamic range and the warm colors and the fact that it's got an optical viewfinder and it's not bogged down with a bunch of menu options.

I just can't keep up with the cost of film right now. Doing some rough math, a roll of film costs me about $25 to shoot (including buying the roll, shipping the roll to the lab and then development. (I do all my own scanning)).

But at $25 a roll, I could buy a 5d for about 9 rolls of developed film.

Can any of you post your favorite 5d shots you've taken so I can get a better idea of what I'm getting before I press the buy button?
34 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_7237s.jpg (1.25 MB, 2000x3000)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB JPG
>>4374584
Hi,

By autofocus issues I was speaking specifically about backfocusing/frontfocusing which can be quite troublesome. They typically aren't that common but when they are you would need a specialist to fix it. I have had one with that issue but it was caused by a previous owner trying to tamper with it, trying to make the outer points more accurate at the cost of the accuracy of the centre point.

Regarding the picture, I think the noise is noticeable only because its about a 50% crop. The 5D's noise is good for it's age and so long as you aren't trying to pull shadows from the depths you probably won't have any issues. It's noise is also, and this is a matter of opinion, pretty pleasing and might not something that you'll want to remove necessarily.

It's a great camera, I'm you'll enjoy it. It's built really well. You might need to get a new port cover off aliexpress or a similar site though as those rubbers rot. 3rd part batteries might also be worthwhile, I have some extended life chinesium ones from eBay and since the 5D has no live view it's not uncommon for me to a few months on a single charge of one battery.

Thanks,
Ken.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D
Camera SoftwareDigital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution800 dpi
Vertical Resolution800 dpi
Image Created2023:08:01 13:31:05
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length300.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2912
Image Height4368
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_6802-Enhanced-NR.jpg (147 KB, 667x1000)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
>>4373558
very viable with LR AI noise reduction. Without EXIF I wouldn't know what took this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:18 19:42:37
Exposure Time1/2500 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_9689.jpg (180 KB, 667x1000)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
It's got limitations, but you just have to lean into them.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.0.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:20 22:33:52
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/1.4
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/1.4
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4373777
>the EF 70-300 being ass, unless you go with an L lens
The MkII is good.
>>
>>4373947
>which is the Nikon to compare it to as full frame
The original has no equivalent given that it was available a generation before Nikon had full frame.

File: Nikon Z7.jpg (43 KB, 369x354)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
Post image of your Nikon camera please.
>Please only real Nikon image no regressive generative computer image.
61 replies and 28 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375762
It's an approximation. Don't use pinpoint AF, it's precise without giving you an accurate frame target. I like to use the 3D tracking mode which also gives you a smallish box, slap that puppy on whatever you want in focus and bob's your uncle. It's doing a lot of processing under the hood. If you want focus confirmation, punch in on the preview and confirm yourself. The Z6 and Z6II (and Z7s) have annoying AF, but if you trust them they're actually quite accurate on most of the automatic modes.
>>
>>4375762
Such are the sorrows of mirrorless.
>>
>>4375999
Oh ho ho ho no, Canon AF on mirrorless is dreamy. This is clearly a Niggon problem
>>
>>4375999
My sony works fine

>inb4 “but dis one broke” canned seethe from clive/om5 gearfag
When you outsell every non canon brand combined, the sample size necessitates a few lemons. I’d worry more about fuji and panasonic having as many failures with a fraction of the sales. But we dont talk about broken panashit ie: s5ii battery draining here do we? And when we talk about fujis nonexistent WR every slug says “but you dont take pics in hurricanes so its ok!!!!”
>>
>>4373550
I just want the Z7+ to do 2 more things. 1, Trap mode, so I can just set it and when a fucking bird lands in front of it spray it with assplosures, and 2, stream the fucking preview to the ipad. I mean fully, and high resolution. So I can focus that shit on the big fat fuckoff high res 13" ipad display, see the histogram & settings either on a sidebar on the ipad or off on the cameras display itself, so that shits' not covering the image, then shoot the bitch with a tap on the ipad. Let me use a fucking mini so I can strap it to my cock, I mean wrist, and it's like a perfect HUD for the body. Instead Nikon has like 7 different apps, none of which work, or install on various operating systems, or they need a cameras built in wifi & then can't dump the shots to your notebook without killing the notebooks network connection, or what the fuck, but you can count on them not working & being a clusterfuck. Fix your fucking bluetooth module you bastards, it has never worked jfc.

Otherwise I love Nikon. But oh ma fuckin god they need to hire a goddamn programmer who isn't 87.

I don't get it, why is Rhein 2 considered the greatest photo ever made?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.1 (Macintosh) (Adobe Photoshop 21.1 (Adobe Photoshop 21.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3543
Image Height1978
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution7 dpi
Vertical Resolution7 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2020:05:06 11:10:34
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1760
Image Height820
34 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375967

"I'm a bit OCD"

- Andreas Gursky.
>>
>tripfag
>"liminal"
Ignored
>>
>>4375986
Liminal. Liminal. Liminal.
>>
>>4375967
The ends excuse the means.
>>
>>4375959
>We remember the failures who tried far longer than the successes who coasted
Such as? The only thing worse than a bronze medal is a silver one.

File: DSC07729.jpg (884 KB, 2123x3073)
884 KB
884 KB JPG
My personal fav is waterdrop pictures
>1/6 sec
>f/16
>ISO 800

and that's how you always get a waterdrop pic

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelNEX-3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)86 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time1/5 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash, Compulsory, Red-Eye Reduce
Focal Length24.00 mm
White BalanceAuto
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
10 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4371167
It's also in the exif. I think OP mentioned it because of the length of the water drop. No fuckin' idea why you'd need ISO 800 with a flash at such short range though, even at f/16.
>>
>>4371206
The length of the drop is determined by the flash duration, which is determined by the flash strength. Aperture and ISO do have an effect on that but you could use any combination.
>No fuckin' idea why you'd need ISO 800 with a flash at such short range though, even at f/16.
He may have been able to lower the ISO and increased the flash power, however more power does mean a longer flash duration. Also the NEX-3 uses a tiny weak proprietary flash so it is going to have its limits.
>>
>>4371213
Huh, I always thought of flash as basically instantenous regardless of the flash power. I was under the impression that lowering the power was actually lowering the power, not lowering the duration of the flash.
>>
>>4371221
My understanding of how xenon flashes work (I haven't really looked into it that much) is that unlike an LED where you can vary the voltage to change the brightness you just feed them power and then they pulse at a certain brightness, like a mousetrap going off for a crappy analogy. However because it takes a little while for that flash to complete its pulse you can cut it off before it's finished.
>>
>>4368301
N00dz

File: SonyA7V.jpg (103 KB, 1280x720)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
With Sony still making the best cameras and lenses used by professionals and enthusiast photographers worldwide what are your expectations of the new and improved A7V? we know it will be a industry leading revolution game changer and a number one seller instant hit but what features are you most excited to?
50 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4374500
Not the worst idea, you'll have an EVF and focus peaking to make focusing easier. Just don't expect any sort of sharpness, you'll get "character" instead but that may be preferred for portraits.
>>
I would actually like sony more if they bricked video gearfags cameras for their eternal hunger for "MUH UNCROPPED 4k 60!!!!"

Video faggots deserve to be punished for all the bloating they've inflicted upon mirrorless
>the FOV changed when i set it to slowmo soap opera framerate noooo make the sensor worse pls
>z6ii->z6iii
yeah thanks faggots

no one uses 4k60 except for soap operas. the world runs on 4k24. who tf gives a FUCK about the crop, it looks fine, just move the camera when you shoot slow motion.
>>
>>4368709
Sony is for retards influencerzzz and filthy plebs who can’t into photography. Their cameras are badly designed, cheaply made shitboxes for gooks and teenage girls with dainty little hands & no idea what makes a camera actually good. And it isn’t megapixels ffs. God Sony sucks donkeyballs.
>>
>>4374592
you are wrong
>>
>>4374592
This is always said by the kind of tasteless retard who prefers a d850 and f2.8 zooms
Dont forget to leave it on HDR BKT

Did you ever wonder why the MoMA is basically 100% leica and 0% d850

File: rp.png (1.22 MB, 904x888)
1.22 MB
1.22 MB PNG
Are people really going to accept this?
It looks fake as, a real photographer would do a much better job.
12 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375697
Based, but you've grossly underestimated your MPs for film.
>>
>>4375786
He'll be future proof if he buys a high-MP digital FF, though.
>>
>>4375688
i doubt ai in ads will last long. people will have issues with not seeing the real product. same way some places banned cgi in food ads but times 1000
>>
Why is she on tatooine?
>>
based. fuck photographers and fuck models.

File: RAW.jpg (67 KB, 800x700)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>2024
>shooting jpeg
70 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375726
>he doesn't shoot tif
ngmi
>>
File: Yes it's you.jpg (9 KB, 284x242)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>4375777
>not shooting in Jpeg 2000
>>
>>4375801
Do any camera's actually use jpeg 2000 though? There are old dslrs you can get which actually do have a tif file output
>>
File: jpeg2000.png (31 KB, 824x366)
31 KB
31 KB PNG
>>4375802
Not consoomer cameras, but it is a thing.
>>
>be me in 2024
>went back to shooting CCD JPEG

Can we get a Big Ben bread going?
>>


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.