Took this photo of a cute lovely bird[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX120 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.00 - 60.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created1980:01:01 00:04:05Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/4.3ISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.3Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance13.630 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number130-1950
>>4336470[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX160 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.9Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.00 - 80.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2024:07:12 16:58:08Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.9Lens Aperturef/5.9Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length80.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoDigital Zoom Ratio2.0Scene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalDigital Zoomx4.1Shooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance21.530 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number100-0024
>>4336493Bellissimo
>>4265411>I didn't put a filter, I merely moved a few slidersNew digicope just dropped.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX160 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.9Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.00 - 80.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2024:07:13 09:19:44Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.9Lens Aperturef/5.9Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length80.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance9.700 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number100-0040
Finally made the jump from ASP-C to FF. For those who made similar upgrade, is it worth to hold onto the old a6000 (and few prime lenses), or sell them? Did you regret getting rid of your smaller crop sensor cameras?
hold on to it for a while until you're sure you really don't need it or need the cash.
If you're doing any long distance stuff then the crop body will be handy to have, it would be equivalent to cropping down a 54mp full frame image so a decent reach advantage (if you had bought a 45mp A7R then it probably wouldn't be worth it). Just bear in mind that you don't have any IBIS so you'll want to be using a stabilised lens and the AF is worse.
Crop=circumisedFF=uncircumisedSimple as
>>4339217What's the tranny equivalent? Phones?
>>4339234Micro four turds
Feel free to dump any figurine images you got.Here are a few of mine.
>>4331506Hey I have that figure too. I am really bad however I just started taking pictures of my figures for fun. I am ok with being bad right now since sucking at something is the first steps to being sorta ok at it.
>>4338656Still I would have never known how important work in post is to making a picture look the way you want it. It is still bad on a base level but at least it looks a little better
>>4334826Fuck yeah this rules. Purple on top blue to the left? What are you using for light? You should invest in a cheap backdrop like a piece of paper, though honestly the computer desktop bg adds to it in its own way.
>>4338685to the left i used my iphone flash with a blue gel over it while the light above was a full magenta desktop background darkened to compensate for the extra exposure timei didnt get around to finding a good platform to get the figure up to the level of my desktop to better use it as a backdropalso retouched it so the blue graduated filter goes in the direction of the light source rather than from the bottom[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3100Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern738Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Created2024:07:12 14:57:20Exposure Time3 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4338656>>4338657Good attitude. And yeah, i think post processing is half the fun![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
I live in a very touristic city in Italy and I had this business idea as a street photographer that does 1800s style pictures to tourists. I was wondering, since I am no expert in photography whatsoever, what would be the best set to make daguerrotype style photos I can print fast to and sell portraits to tourists. I think using an actual old camera is unfeasable, I wonder if there is something modern that takes photos like that or some presets. any idea will help me. thanks in advance. >pic unrelated[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-A055FCamera SoftwareMediaTek Camera ApplicationMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)22 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width2160Image Height3840Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:17 13:15:39Exposure Time931/100000 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating26Lens Aperturef/1.9Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.21 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2160Image Height3840Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4339321>>4339320i probably used the wrong term. i meant something like victorian looking photos. they don't have to be OG daguerrotypes. thanks for the replies tho
>>4339324You want to be a fake?Buy a decrept box camera sorta thing (like a kodak brownie) and modify it to hide a small DSLR+kit lens set to raw. Hide a tethering cable going to a laptop and printer hidden in a booth. Apply your old timey preset, export, print, and cram it in your premade faux-olde timey frame. Done.
>>4339327i mean everything is fake nowadays. also I wouldn't charge them more than 5 euros. people on the streets charge more for polaroids. thanks for the reply
>>4339334There's a possibility that the right printer + editing could get you a cheap and "good enough" facsimile of a wetplate or daguerrotype if you printed the images on black trophy plate...You could charge a lot more money if you actually did wetplate portraits well. The materials for an 8x10 wetplate are around 7-8 dollars, and you could charge 100+ dollars. 4x5 is around 2 dollars in materials and I bet you could charge around 40-60 per plate.
>>4339319>I had this business idea as a street photographer that does 1800s style pictures to touristsfucking lying sack of shit nigger you just copied that shit you saw on youtube kys
I have been a a Nikon D200 CHAD for the past year and a half but due to shear boredom and the screen being absolute dogshit I impulsively bought a Fujifag XT-3 because random people on the internet told me it was good, what am I in for? what lens should I get?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpcmVertical Resolution72 dpcmImage Created2018:09:04 13:42:59Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1800Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4336501this and 35mm f1.4 and 23mm f1.4 or f2 if you're cheap. The pancake 27 is cool but super out of stock new and used.Alternatively the original kit lens with IS. I like primes more though.
>>4336175>I impulsively bought a Fujifag XT-3 because random people on the internet told me it was goodI wish I had money to throw around for no particular reason.
>>4336505>XT3 is the equivalent of Thinkpad T470.Literally the worst ThinkPad right after T490.
>>4339096Thinkpad X1 Gen 6 maybe, same year 2018.I got a x1 yoga 2018 and T430s as well.Don't want to sell it cuz value is too low anyway.Editing this shot with X1 yoga 2018 on a camping trip, mountain to beach.Planning to try A72 or A6400 but they're all used up work horses.
>>4336175I loved the D200 when it came out. What was that 2007 or so? Some of my best photos came out of that camera.
Rate my Nikon FG that’s fully loaded with the intended products![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width2700Image Height3600
>>4338290more like Niggon FAG
Pushpull zooms are horrible even tho period appropriate
>>4338843push-pull zooms are great. I hate two-ring manual zooms because I have to move my hand back and forth over the lens to zoom, then focus, then zoom again, then focus again. with a push-pull I can just handjob the lens.
>>4338290Show me the alcohol bottle.
Nice setup though!
>While traveling out to the desert for a shoot, Monte Ashcroft a world class editorial photographer meets his new muse in Dakota Thompson, a local server at a desolate diner. Their connection is instant and profound, with the exception of one big secret.https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11439124/What are some notable /p/-approved kinos?
>>4338469>>4338520>>4338532>>4338535You people are all retards.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width828Image Height842
The only good film about a muse is Xanadu and it hard filtered soulless critics
>>4337955Nobody needs that many cameras, what a gearfaggotry
>>4338520Did they fix that economy yet
>>4339206>bunch of lazy Greeks most of which never worked a day in their life >"fixing" the economy Lmao
This still needs a little work.
This website basically calls you out on being unoriginal
>>4337444they are correct to my eyes>inb4 get zeiss spectaclesno.
guess I'm living in a simulation[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.A256EXXS2AXD1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height2340Unique Image ID696430cf-5ec9-4ed0-aa07-7ab0852deb10
all is well in life
>>4337240expect it doesn't tell you whether you act like a machine. It tells you whether the produced picture look like it could have been produced by a specific type of machine, the generative AI, and it has really specific biases to it, such as its difficulty to reproduce detailed scenes and certain types of subjects. The fact your pictures feature easily reproducible scenes says nothing of your likeness to a machine; rather, given that those machines are trained on human data and are best at producing what's common in the dataset, it says that you are behaving too much like a regular human. Another bias is technical: If I take the same picture wirh different cameras some will be significantly less likely to have been produced by AI. does taking the same picture with a lomo lca makes you more self aware than taking it with a nikon digital camera ?
I am planning on hiking significant portions of the pacific crest trail and setting out on a full excursion in the next year or so. What gear should I bring?I immediately thought of something like a Pentax K1/k3-3 and the 28-105mm f/3.5-5.6. It would give me a complete weather sealed kit with okay battery life.But I was thinking it would actually be ideal if I could find a film setup. I would save so much weight. No (significantly less) batteries, no laptop, no power banks. I would just stop off at one of the many towns along the route and mail the film out, have them developed and scanned then returned to my parents house. I can have the scans emailed to me and uploaded from my phone.But I am open to any other good solutions, what is your go-to here? Remember single lens solutions only.
Honestly, unless you hate yourself, I would probably just get a new iPhone. The camera is damn good for the size, you can even shoot RAW, it's multipurpose, can act as a GPS rescue device if shit gets fucked up... there's not much to recommend any digital camera on an endurance hike like this. Every ounce counts and you will find a camera becomes an anchor you resent dragging.That said, you could always bring a little film camera and if it does get too heavy, ship it back to yourself when you tire of it.
>>4339140just use mft at that point. even the newest iphone is really bad on anything with detail. for modern architecture its ok, like excessive high iso shooting, but once the sharpening and hdr (even in raw) rear their heads it goes to shit
>>4338787Nikonos V (and start practice shooting it now bc you won't like it having to figure it out on the trail). It weighs as much as your head, and you'll have to fuck about with film cartridges and worry about # of shots, but they will be beautiful.ORAnd just like fucking roll with me for a sec, but lets reconsider the hated Nikon ZF, + a 14-30 f4 lens. On a trip like this, you're gonna take 3 kinds of images.1. vidya2. quick snaps for your feed3. very fucking fine hi-res landscapes.1.It does fine and great but through that fucking excellent glass2.Only does at 24mp, which, nigga that's still huge compared to how far down you're going to crop & resize for posting anywhere, and with that lens they still look goddamn spectacular compared to any shitty phone pics.3. Great big Fuck Off landscapes actually work pretty well innawoods bc the wind's not moving every damn thing around so much that it doesn't work. Set your timing so it blasts em fast & the merge in post does the rest. Use a simple light hand-sized tripod and a strap to mount it on stable rocks or around tree trunks so it's still, and BAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAM there's your 140mpx mega wide panorama of the beautiful PNW. The rest of your life you will see them and be thankful you took the effort. People will tell you to publish them in a book but you will know better.The nicety of the ZF is that with lens off, it's flat as fuck and packs down nicely anywhere you want to put it, including carry-ons, outer pack pockets and jacket pockets. The 14-30 is a stout little fucker, small enough to sit in your other jacket pocket. Not as compact as a P&S, but shoots the kind of images you're going to want at a quality far better. Fuck I should get another one. I had one and sold it bc I had to have a Sony. Fuck the Sony was made by engineers, not designers. Fits in the hand like shit, trying to do anything requires the misery of their menus. Rather gouge my eyes out with skewers.
>>4339151Oh yeh, plus that bitch is weathersealed. ...the ZF & Z lens, not the Nikonos V. The V is fully waterproof, blast proof, and everything else proof. But again, you'd have to have someone mail you film drops at places on your route so you can pick them up and ship completed rolls out to the dev as you go. But man, when you're out there you're never going to be happy having to ration shots bc you only get 36 exp on a roll. A bunch of lightweight hi capacity cards and a solar charger are your friend. Then at night when you want to fuck around you can review your images from the day on cam & weed your bad shots to kill the hours of darkness when the mood hits you. And it will.
>>4339151>2. quick snaps for your feedmodernity was a fucking mistake, istg
What makes this photograph so good?
I love pictures of litte girls
>>4333054>>4333054surreal without being obvious about it.
>>4333072Agree with this anon. The girl is an interesting and charismatic subject for sure, but the poor, heavy-handed editing, and the uninteresting composition, damn.
>>4334679papists can't into Ecclesiastes
Why don’t mods delete pedo threads?
>ovfs being clearly suprerior>allow you to always frame up and compose, even while the camera if off>some gay faggot: "B-but I need to preview my exposure!">take one shot, look at it and adjustAre people really this retarded that they can't even get close without a computer holding their widdle, itty-bitty baby fingees?
>>4338924Based>>4338914Its for manual focus because dslr fresnel screens are too hazy and low res to be usable and focus shift from wide open makes it pointless anywaysThe only exposure that needs previewed is white balance, otherwise shoot raw and exposure comp -.5 lol
>>4338821
>>4338923Just use a dandelion if it bothers you so much sperg
Who cares?
>>4338923rangefinder and split-image (D)SLR chads don't have this problem>>4338924if the OVF has no method of manual focusing, yes.otherwise no.
When are gonna nips restart the digishit production? Will they restart the production at all? While one might think that digishits are no longer needed due to phones, it is not the case. Phones are too small to jam good optics inside, especially zoom lenses. So argument of "we won't make cameras that can be replaced with a phone" is kinda full of shit.I think what did stop the sales of digishits, is corona. People bought digishits when they were traveling and realized that their phone kinda sucks. Or alternatively, they didn't just want to drain their phone battery in middle of nowhere in country where they don't speak local language for shit. Seeing the success of Fuji X100VI or whatever it's called and similar big-ish sensor cameras, I wonder if they will start making bridge or compact cameras with smaller sensor but zoom lenses so you can get in close up and personal? Or the success (of sort) Taiwanese Kodak digishits that are literally 2012 low-end digishit that is still manufactured today for some reason. Think about it. Imagine what can you achieve with a modern phone sensor (which are quite big these days, 1/1.7" etc.), coupled with much bigger lens!
>>4330726How not to design a chart… that is so damn difficult to read and also they forgot to add Nikon.
>>4330727Imagine being the zoomer who gets one as a Christmas present lmao
>>4336316Always wanted one. Seemed like a hell of an image. My LX100 is indispensable though, only camera I've bought twice. I've even sold prints from it. >>4336323My LX100 has always had dust in it. Never cared because a) I rarely shoot above 5.6 and b) if I do it becomes a point that I can clone out easily.
>>4336451>My LX100That camera along with other later Panasonics with the same form factor have the same issue for some reason.
Just leaving this hereBut its $500 + tips + waiting
would be called the shitty rendering of a soft vintage lens if it was manufactured by any other company.
>>4337058>Both attacked by coping poors that miss every shot they take at themooof
>>4337059>muh japshiteven soviet shit was better
Why are there more used Leicas than anything else I see on the used market when it comes to 35mm film cameras?Do people just buy these overpriced things because they’re the only current film cameras and then sell them off when they get bored?
Leica is goyPhone of cameras
i'm about to enjoy some voigtlander glow[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelXQ1Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.38Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:18 23:17:32Exposure Time0.3 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-2.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height1500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusBlur WarningChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeOffFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKMacro ModeOnPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
First time shooting portra 800 on my half frame and scanning myself.How did I do?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNGCamera ModelWB30F/WB31F/WB32FCamera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:04 19:52:41Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/4.4Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length9.60 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1440Image Height1920Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormal
Lmao nice going opie. I say this sitting on a bench holding a half frame camera in my lap. You really got some anons mad.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-A536U1Camera SoftwareA536U1UES9EXE3Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:16 19:59:34Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness0.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.23 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3456Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image IDF64ESNGR0AM
>>4338309I should've probably enabled the film compression option...
>>4332777digishitters... I FUGGIN KNEEL
>>4332777Filmcucks have no self esteem, they shoot outdated format, can't view photos while they shoot, go wash film in some sketchy chemicals that shorten thier lifes to in the end miss thier exposure and ruin the photo. Then then return home where big cocked digichad bangs thier wife while taking multiple photos and clips to share them immidiately on the internet. Filmcucks can't compete.
I knew immediately it couldn't be half frame because of how sharp it is. Maybe if you'd claimed it was 35mm on ultramax you would've fooled me. I should've noticed the smudges in the black fur from the shitty noise reduction.
any photos taken of, out of, or in the theme of transportation[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M4Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:17 06:12:43Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating4000Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-4.4 EVExposure Bias-1.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length39.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2700Image Height2700RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4338381Thanks Anon![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-LX3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:13 22:50:33Exposure Time30 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4338404love this photo
I kind of like the idea because it's basically the photography equivalent of wardrivingPic rel: An Aussie road as soon as you leave wallagambaggada[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-PL7Camera SoftwareVersion 1.4Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Color Filter Array Pattern13780Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4638Image Height3092Compression SchemeUncompressedImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2024:07:13 13:51:51Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.00 mmImage Width4638Image Height3092RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelSM-A037FEquipment MakesamsungFocal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopImage Created2024:06:30 19:08:08F-Numberf/2.8Exposure Time3/100 secFocal Length3.42 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVWhite BalanceManualLens Aperturef/2.6