night scenes editionprevious >>4501719
New thread:>>4505100>>4505100>>4505100
>>4505097"I've never heard of Kanye West so how can he be famous?" retarded ass reply
>>4505095>There are people in the photo so it's a portrait I know this is bad bait to begin with but at least put in some effort
>>4505074>I meant to ask what are some non-portrait photos that are famous because they're greatHindenburg maybe? Or the Lochness Monster? The thing that makes pretty much every photo great or famous is the story they tell and that always involves people or some event unfolding (such as the first photo of the moon in space because it's the very first).
>>4505107I love Kanye West, he is famous.The Afghan girl = KanyeWinter Sunrise, Sierra Nevada = his Pablo merch
Anyone know why my Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens won't focus past 24mm? I've had it a few months and it just started happening. I'm having issues focusing past a few feet, both using manual and autofocus. The body is a Nikon Z5II
>>4505096Superzooms are trash lenses made from trash with trash quality. Now you know.
>>4505096Because nikon has trash manufacturing done in places like thailand on the cheapUse nikon long enough and you’ll understand how canon always got away with crippled low end cameras and trash sensors. They didnt have real competition.
I had multiple 50mm f1.8 s copies with different autofocus speed, noise, and edge/corner IQ and two Z7IIs because the first one had a tilted EVF screen. just nikon things.
AF-D / AI chud here. Never had such issues.
>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scansAHHHHHHHHH
>>4411869Shoot digital
>>4504984Holy fuck it has, how is the board moving this slowly now?
>>4487718I thought it'd be fun to shoot some colour film in my 35mm snapshitter, film cost me 14 euros, develop and scan costs me about 20 euros, that's almost 1 euro per frame.So I made the move to black/white medium format film and learning to dev myself. Which is a fair bit cheaper and more fun.
>>4411869Kentmere 400 $7,50One batch of rodinal and fixer <$1Time to start developing at home!
You can get your C41 roll developed for 20 RMB ($3), so someone's probably making a profit.
Looking to transition from still photography to moving. The Sony NEX-VG30 was on a list of potential firsts. Now available to me for a few hundred. I'm looking to make short films, mostly narrative. From what I've researched, I don't think I will mind the quirks. I'm intrigued at the prospect of using a strange and uncommon camera. But I would hate to be wrong. I'm dead broke and just beginning. Anyone had experience shooting with it? Insights? Suggestions?
>>4505082Just use your legs to move.
Don't mind that it's not 4K. I don't like images overly clear or sharp anyway. But I am worried that it won't necessarily have a "cinematic" quality. As well as performance in low light. Footage is hard to come by and all of it is utilitarian. Everyone talks about using it for news, documentary, etc. I assumed I could make it "artsier" in the edit and investing in some vintage lenses. Which is its main draw
>>4505082Vg20 is more superior. The vg30 has a worse sensor.Get the 18-105mm pz and its killer.
I saw online the 0.03 megapixel camera and was kinda curious so i snapped a few pics and modified them in gimp to reach a similar effect, including the resolution.I honestly having quite a bit of fun with these and i'm enjoying the results quite much
>>45017681.4MP might be the output size, but you'll rarely see a thermal sensor with more than 640*512.They're hard to make and fall under ITAR restrictions.
>>4503286Yeah. Shows up as 0.3 MP now. Idk where I got the 1.4 from. I swear I didn't pull it out of my ass.
>>4500590Family in bomb shelters?
>>4500590berg
I want to buy a Christmas gift for a girl and I thought of a polaroid as a great gift for her. My question to you, /p/ederasts, is whether it's worth it and not just a meme
>>4482270>gift for a girlsay no more
>>4482270>Christmas gift>it's April 1st
>>4502842>>4502843He cute
>>4493284From searching it looks like it cotss around £35. Is that what you're finding too?Do you know what stuff they do or don't have? A filter, a tripod, or some batteries can make a good camera related present.You can also get a camera clip in that sort of region of expense.
Congrats on making the most lame thread ever
5.4 is out, what do we think bros?
>>4502591Wow, anon, I had this Windows desktop for 6 years now and also had no issues. Mindblowing, I know.
>>4502605>richard stallman, the founder of the linux operating system, was pals with epsteinThere's no way in hell Stallman was ever invited to anything more than some sweaty nerd fest. Guy is a wackjob completely detached from reality, but he's definitely one of the people NOT in any Epstein files.
>>4490510How did you "develop" your workflow? Did you actually study the elements of a photo and decide what you think would look better if you were to change it?I'm an amatuer photographer and I tend to just fuck around on dt until I think the image looks good.Also I don't use any graphs/anything that isn't a slider, should I? Pic rel is the last picture I've taken and edited
>>4490529>the biggest issue for me is chromatic aberration. none of the modules i've tried seem to get rid of it>>4490532>Handling CA is tough and I don't have lots of practiceI recently tried the RAW Chromatic Aberration tool and it seemed to work quite well with no sliders to fiddle with - not using the lens CA corrections at all.Any ill effects I'm not noticing?
>>4504833Manual lens geometry correction is missing from latest version of Darktable.
Why are they so bad at taking photos?
>>4504396>the d5 is unironically the best low light nikonWhat the absolute fuck are you even saying
>>4504105>>4504116>>4504126Say the line.
>>4504787it's been testedthere is less noise
so did they land and walk on the moon this time?
>>4503837Because it is all fake and gay so they have to be very selective in what they show the plebs.
any final thoughts on ultra wide angle?
>>4498717>>4496620With UWA you have to be at the spot and everything should look kino, you can't just select something and compose for it because as was said everything is in the shot. I found that UWA makes things look tiny especially big mountains so it was much better for foreground objects composed with whatever is in the background. it makes the scene look meh, even spectacular ones so you better select a flower or a rock or bench, something to put in front of the scenery.
>>4499303Cinematography lens meant for wide-angle interiors and exteriors are very different animals than ones meant for film photography or digital slrs.
>>4496645i think it depends on the creative direction you are going for.
Wide angle captures a wide view of the scene.Whether that's something you want is subject to change but that's why lenses can be swapped.If you're indecisive you get a zoom lens.Walking doesn't zoom, it just changes perspective.
>>4496504Fovlets btfo!
Some people say that to get rich you gotta do what others don't wanna do. For a photographer it means going to a warzone. What are some other fields in photography that can make you rich and famous but you just hate doing it?
>>4504458>Commercial photographyHow do I start in 2026?
>>4504453What is your point? Everyone has a camera, soldiers, beggars, tourists.
>>4504461You'll start at the bottom and the bottom in my mind is real estate photography. Talk to some real estate agents in your area and ask about who they hire, as they likely hire a small local company, then just talk to that company about getting a job. You will make shit pay and shit hours because you're basically a peon but it's a foot in the door.
>>4504446Not famous, but you can be rich doing product photography since most online sellers don't focus on it.
>>4504446all decent paying work is soul sucking if you want to make art
Hello /p/ I've been lurking for years and have been taking snapshits/gradually improving over time. I got some practice on my dad's Canon cameras (one digital, one film). I only have my phone camera, a go pro (hero 12?), and an ilford sprite 35mm film camera. Most of my film rolls were shot on my dad's canon film camera though. I think it's time I bite the bullet and buy a full frame (maybe mirrorless). I'm pretty sure I want to go with digital, even though film is fun.Any recommendations? I can give more info if needed. My film shots are different from my usual shots on my phone, I have a pretty varied subject/frame honestly.
>>4504429I can safely vouch for the 5Diii by Canon. I used it for years and will probably use it for years to come. Is resolution important to you? You mentioned mirrorless twice, are you looking for something specific that only newer bodies offer? Like IBIS = sensor stabilisation, or higher resolution sensors, or better low light performance?
>>4504831Pic relatedBtw. oftentimes the gear question is answered with budget
>>4504538>Canon r8 with a prime lens+1Served me somewhat well I reckon. Except I have a bunch of L zooms and the RF 100-400 that has its uses.
>>4504831 >>4504832Resolution isn't insanely important to me, but I would like something that looks nice. The only reason I mentioned mirrorless is because it's newer tech, so the lenses I buy for mirrorless will be useful for longer (I know you can use DSLR lenses on mirroess with an adapter, so maybe this is a moot point)
>>4504834I like how the green looks on the car, I marshal motorsport races so I might be taking similar photos (but I can't use a camera while I'm marshaling, so idk)
>15 years old>still produces more appealing images than any modern compact cameraHow did Leica pull this off?
>>4504700>>4504701>yeah it sucks because um... it just does OKAYWhy do Leicas always attract these retarded contrarian opinions?Don't worry anon, I'm sure there's a recipe for your X100 that looks just as good!
>>4504611Its just a rebadged panny LX
>leicaman thread>no photosIts been memed to death and still true every time
>>4504611That is not the Ricoh GR Digital (2008)
>>4504847It's like poetry it rhymes
What do you guys think?Any ideasI'm thinking it could be a weekly thing with a specific theme each week
>>4504107We used to have monthly challenge threads (as a week is honestly too short) but the OP left after a few years of running them. They were honestly pretty good, but some of the challenges were also a bit too difficult for enough people to compete in, so that lessened how many people contributed.
>>4504780I also think that having it monthly might've been a bit too ambitious.
>>4504789It's a hard balance. I think monthly can work, but the theme has to be something that anyone can realistically do, like finding certain colors on buildings or certain shapes or something.
>>4504790I think it's a bit like the world hockey cup vs the Olympic hockey cup. If it's less frequent, it will be a bigger event and more people will bother to participate.
>>4504794That could work, maybe one every 3 months. 4 times a year is an alright span for some contests imo.
.
>>4504781>nophotos
>>4504776>t. retard
>>4499962illiterate mouthbreathers shouldn't be allowed to breed.
>>4504774>>4504777>>4504781>t.
>>4499962>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThoHa5qGgtQ
We know that original Kodachrome isnt coming back due to the toxic chemicals used in developing rolls, but why arent Kodak or any other film manufacturer creating a new film stock that looks like Kodachrome? Is it really impossible to create other film stocks than these hazy yellow tinted pissy stocks available now? Ektar is way too red, Portra and Gold too yellow, Ektachrome too blue and so forth. Deep black shadows, punchy reds and yellows, good contrast, perfect blues, lots of black in all colors. No weird general color tint. If a Kodachrome copy was launched it would be a fucking goldmine $$ for Kodak or whomever launched it.
>>4504413Easy. The two on the left are Ektachrome, the two in the right are kodackrome. Easy.t. Ektachrome chad
>>4504712you are correct, not bad
>>4503470
>>4504748Here's one you can level and saturate to your own taste
>>4504748>>4504749what? we are not talking about emulation herepost raw if you want to start though
