Repair EditionThis was a 24-70/2.8 AF-S with a loose hood mount and I stripped it down and tightened it and also pre-emptively threadlocked the front barrel as that is a common issue with that coming loose.
>>4306154Seems pretty good, idk if there's anything special with the colors, but the available input profiles for it are decent. That's a big part of the color science shit, but what does actually look nice is the low CCD noise. Nice and clean.
Used an app for a pansconic cam, the smartphone remote shooting let me adjust manual focus, do focus shifting, exposure bracketing, all kinds of stuff.Why is snapbridge so barebones and shitty? Am I using the wrong app here?
>>4300028CCD era cameras like the D200 or Sony a3xx are my favorite but have shit iso performance[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareNegative Lab ProMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern478Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:19 21:00:49Light SourceUnknownColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Any tips on shopping for mechanical, manual, film Nikon bodies and how to make sure I'm getting one that still works well, considering the age? I guess "don't buy from a rando that found it in an attic and doesn't know how to test it", but beyond that?Also, tips about models that are most likely to have "held up". I don't really care if the camera is pre-AI or AI. Even though I do plan to put AF-D lenses on it I have used film cameras without working meters before and it doesn't bother me. I'd like it to HAVE a working meter, just because I suspect if the meter doesn't work then there could be other things wrong with it.But the pre-AI cameras are of course inherently older, and therefore give me more concern about general wear and tear.What I wish to avoid is getting one that "mostly" works enough to pass a casual inspection but will shortly exhibit weird random issues. Stuff that if it had happened to the original owner in the 70s or 80s they'd have sent it in for warranty repair, but if I buy it now I'll just be stuck with, etc.tl;dr: how to know a 50 year old obsolete camera is gonna work
>>4306168>Does it merge the 16 shots in camera or do you have to merge them yourself in some software?You have to merge in NX Studio.>Did they fuck it up somehow by not allowing it to work with electronic/silent shutter to the point where shutter shock shits on your sharpness?Enabling pixel shift automatically sets your shutter type to electronic.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 22:06:44Exposure Time1/1250 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0.7 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length241.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2100Image Height1400RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3506Image Height5260Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 21:44:19Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias1/3 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1400Image Height2101RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width2724Image Height4358Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 21:49:23Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias1/3 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1400Image Height2240RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 21:50:55Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias1/3 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1400Image Height2100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4302169I want to use its tail to clean some bottles and jars.
Thoughts on the S5II/S5IIX as a stills camera?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
4304299Is this some new bot? I’ve seen this same exact reply in a few different threads across the boards now. Wonder what the trigger is.
>>4302282I love my S5. It definitely takes amazing photos, but I really don't like using it for important fast photography (events, paid work, etc). The button layout and interface isn't as intuitive as my Nikon DSLRS (D600, D7100).I especially hate how it's not easy to delete photos quickly. Maybe the S5II has improved this idk?Works well with some adapted canon lenses (Tamron 17-35 2.8-4, Sigma 24-105 f4, Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5, Canon 50mm 1.8 STM)I only have the native Lumix S 20-60mm lens. Phenomenal lens, just a little slow.Its a perfect camera for video tho.
>>4302286"full frame is not cinematic" may I ask what it means good sir? I assumed that you are talking about super 35 are better than fullframe stuffs but I think it's only better in cinema camera world. In mirrorless/dslr, full frame is definitely much better.
>>4305698Do you think cinema cameras are not mirrorless or SLR? What do you think they are, pellicle mirror cameras?Are you not aware that some noise/grain is actually desirable in video even at levels where it's intolerable in stills? Movies beloved for their camera work have used 16mm film. That's like filming on micro four thirds.Full frame is not cinematic. It is soap operamatic. Or shitty super hero movie...matic. Bokeh in motion is the festering brand of consoomer slop.
>>4302282Unless you have some specific need, it's gonna be the same as every other full frame camera. 14 stops of range with 24-33mpx sensor, your deciding factor should be lenses and ergonomics, imo.
how do i get colors like this? i love how the sky and trees look on this one, its very soft and pleasing to the eye
>>4305631To get color like that literally just find any chick in France they’re all black now I hear
>>4305631looks like a generic phone snapshit, what are you on
>>4305631Buy an iphone 10
>>4305636that's what the meta is
>>4305643a lot of street photos i see on instagram while aesthetic capture literally nothing.
>I don't have a job>I shoot 100 rolls a month>When the stimulus check hit I've been spending a lot>1200-1300 undeveloped rolls in the fridge>500 rolls that are developed but not scanned (not seen by me)Why are filmfags like this?https://youtu.be/gqxzx2BDm0Q[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1828 dpiVertical Resolution1828 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height849
>>4305579Well if gearfaggotry didnt work it would die off. But it works. It works really well for the people that have a modicum of talent/connections.
>>4305579>>4305480Share with me what the ideal non/anti-gearfag setup would be? Can I still shoot large format film without being a gearfag, or is 35mm the only permissible film format?
>>4305619gearfaggotry isn't something you can buy and sell, gearfaggotry isn't a line drawn in dollars, and gearfaggotry isn't a status you earn because you have a nicer camera than someone else. you might be financially irresponsible, rich, a scrooge, or addicted to retail therapy, but you're not over the line yet. you are not yet gearfag just because you have gear. you are definitely a fag, but not yet a gearfag.it's a way of life, it's a way of looking at photography, from the results to the process - all through the lens of gear. making excuses based on gear. passing judgement based on gear. it doesn't stop at the camera, it doesn't stop at film vs digital, ccd vs cmos, or full frame vs mft. gearfaggotry runs deep. deeper than "i will finally take those photos once I get my leica". the tripod, the head, the flash, the modifiers, the reflectors, the scrims, the fucking STANDS, the screen, the printer, the paper, the frame, the glass. the gearfag is exacting. the gearfag is never satisfied. the gearfag has spent a lot of time thinking about all of these, arguing about the best - the gearfag sees all of these things, all this gear, as so inexorably intertwined with photography that photography is mostly just about what you used to make the photo. and it need not be expensive, the gearfag may very well decide that expensive things make photography worse. it's just about the gear. when the gearfag is presented with a photo they want a closer look at the exif before they even look at the fucking picture so they can make sure they're allowed to like it. and if you used flash, they will ask you which flash you used. so they can say "oh, doesn't the color temperature vary up to 400k? you shot on that trash? no wonder your colors are FUCKED".that is what it means to be gearfag.just by asking what to buy so you can not be a gearfag, as if a purchase can make you more authentic photographer, you put a toe over the gearfag line. retract it. Now!
>>4305622That must have been fun to write, and I agree with you. It's an excuse to judge an image based on the gear rather than the content. I like prints more than looking at images on a screen. I have fun imagining a pixel peeper/gearfag using a loupe or standing 1 inch away from a framed print on a wall exclaiming that the corners are soft from a shitty lens and declaring it a terrible picture for that reason alone. In a completely silent gallery as well.
>>4305387valid>>4305524<1% is actually is like that
post ur train/station/tracks pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.40.010 (210714)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:20 13:51:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX0M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:10 19:52:31Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness9.0 EVExposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash FunctionFocal Length7.90 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length70.00 mmImage Width2048Image Height1363RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4287944Do trams count?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3224Image Height2119Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution2400 dpiVertical Resolution2400 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2022:01:13 11:48:23Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3224Image Height2119
>>4303394I posted a tram upthread, so yes.
>>4296556This one is sick, the colors and composition are absolutely on point, very good job
I've been shooting on a Canon 5DIV for the past few years. My shutter has been sticking and instead of sending it back, figure it's time to upgrade. Before this I was a Nikon shooter with the D700/D750/D800 and really liked it but switched to Canon mainly due to the f1.2 lenses and much better customer service in my country.I rented an R5 and R6II and they were nice enough with the pro zooms and the 50 1.2 but after trying the Z8 and the small 1.8 primes, I really was reminded of what I missed about Nikon. AF was better, the camera bodies felt better and more "rugged", DR was better but in fairness comparing to a previous gen Canon R5. One thing I hated though was how hyuge the Nikon 50 1.2 was- and that's my go-to lens in any system.Is Nikon doing better now as a company in listening to their customers than they did during the DSLR days? I think I read they were overtaken by Snoy so it must be a kick to the nuts to be #3 now.
>>4305077why are anusonic shills always such obnoxious retards? buyers remorse?
>>4304813>z cams are way better builtAs a sonyfag I don't understand why sony has a larger market share when nikon makes better body with same sensor
>>4304839Spoken like someone who has absolutely no idea what they are talking about
>>4305100They got to mirrorless first, they have greater production capacity, they got to the high framerate auto-everything for incompetent journalists thing first, and they opened new tech support centers when nikon had to close some of theirs.What do you think "professionals" (the majority of them, that you should not look up to or imitate, think the underpaid mooks you see following people around on the news and at sports games) actually care about?They don't care about dick. They aren't even photographers. They don't even buy the cameras. Their employer does, and employers care about contracts. Supply contracts. Support contracts. And foolproof shit their retarded employees can use without fucking up. What do employers have right now? Long standing deals with sony, lots of supporting equipment that only has first party support on sony, etc, same reason canon has staying power, decades worth of EF gear is piled up wherever people work however shitty it is because it was the best for masses of non-artistic snapshitters way back when.Nikon just sends cameras into space. 0 future, as far as being a profitable soulless corporate outfit goes. They're going to join pentax, fuji, and panasonic in "artist brands".>>4305594No that's pretty accurate. Just go down lens reviews for E mount sometime35mm f1.4 gm = -3ev wide open, 2ev f250mm f1.2 gm = -2.9ev wide open, -1.3ev f2Many such casesComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4305599I'm looking at uncorrected 50mm 1.2 GM files made on my Z9 and not seeing that level of light loss.
• Theme: Money• Deadline: From 14 April to 5 MayTheme:• The submissions have to feature money, be about money or the lack of itRules:• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.• Three entries per photographer max.• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.Optional:• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.• You may name your images if you wish.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Here's my snapshit[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3400Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:15 14:12:17Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6016Image Height4016RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownImage QualityRAWWhite BalanceAUTOFocus ModeAF-SFlash Compensation0.0 EVFlash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVLens TypeUnknownLens Range50.0 mm; f/1.4Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations2523
Voting has challenge 58 "Morning" has also finally begunEveryone has up to 3 votes, so vote for the photos you consider to be better than the rest:https://forms.gle/DU9bgzGMstcCwbob9Submissions:1 >>4286049 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1708530283906597.jpg2 "Morning Above Clouds" >>4287142 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1708708162524492.jpg3 >>4289584 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1709295415977852.jpg4 "Morning" >>4289610 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1709300528415214.jpg5 "Nothing Ever Happened" >>4291881 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1709801221852432.png6 >>4292957 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710079646885351.jpg7 >>4293147 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710118682565701.jpg8 "Arm Borne" >>4293223 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710152839426669.jpg9 >>4293566 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710235778551963.jpgComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
And finally the winner by default of challenge 59 "Imitation" is 1 "Cabbage Leaf" >>4301227 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1712257513811080.jpgArchive of the thread:https://archived.moe/p/thread/4295821Being European I know very little about American photographers, so thanks for the intro to Edward Weston
>>4304499alice is now palanq.win
>>4304636Big congratulations to mr.cabbage leaf. I knew you could do it.
I took this photo with my cell phone camera and edited it a little, it's a daisy. I'm not a photographer, and this is the first photo I've tried to make look good. What do you think?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNGCamera ModelNX2000Camera SoftwareGoogleSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5472Image Height3648Image Created2023:10:24 21:33:53Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiWhite Point Chromaticity0.3ISO Speed Rating200Exposure ProgramManualF-Numberf/0.0Exposure Time1/640 secSharpnessNormalFocal Length0.00 mmFlashNo FlashSaturationNormalLight SourceDaylightContrastNormalMetering ModePatternScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias2 EVImage Height3648White BalanceManualImage Width5472Exposure ModeManualColor Space InformationUnknown
Fleurs[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 8.2.3 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2023:04:16 11:53:00Exposure Time1/400 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length100.00 mm
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNGCamera ModelNX2000Camera Software1.14Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)308 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width5472Image Height3648Horizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:04:17 16:49:50White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5472Image Height3648Exposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Flower Chad
>>4300741>What do you think?it's a great photo. cell phones aren't bad for stuff you are close to like this. however it doesn't look in focus and the resolution is poor. it also has poor dynamic range and color depth(but you may have edited it out)
Post pics taken with old digital cameras (2005 and older), im gonna post 3 i took today with my Fuji S2 Pro, i hate them because theyre cliché as fuck but hey theyre photos and i want an excuse to post em lmao[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePixS2ProCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)118 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:28 22:45:46Exposure Time1/90 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.8Brightness5.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceShadeFlashNo FlashFocal Length79.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4294950it's directly beside a few things, drop where you think if so. it'd give me a laugh if someone browsing here actually lived here.
>>4280704what a waste of money for real estate. I hope it was not taxpayers money.
>>4296557This is Amsterdam. The money (lots of it) was made with slavery.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:20 12:57:14Exposure Time1473/1000000 secF-Numberf/2.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating74Lens Aperturef/2.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance65.54 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2708Image Height2011
>>4258835[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix2600ZoomCamera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix2600Zoom Ver3.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2001:01:01 03:40:38F-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Shutter Speed1/79 secLens Aperturef/3.5Brightness5.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1600Image Height1200SharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAutoContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
This thread redundant?You don't understand: the shit spreads exponentially.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.2Focal Length (35mm Equiv)76 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:18 14:20:26Exposure Time1539/1000000 secF-Numberf/4.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating74Lens Aperturef/4.2Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance65.54 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length16.29 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2819Image Height1408
Bloom, cringe or based?I like doing flower macro photography wide open, and it gets this dreamy feel because of the heavy blur. I think bloom can enhance this, in the right circumstances.Do you like it? Did Skyrim ruin it?picrel[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6D Mark IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.2.1Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.1Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:01 14:37:58Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1067Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeUnknownFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingUnknownMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix135
>>4300119it looks like when i forget to clean my glasses
VASELINE THREADASELINETHREAD
seems pretty important. a picture of a closed bud just doesn't have the same flair
>>4300119no, your photo is shit and you are a retard basicallystop sharpening your images and overbaking themthen you won't be tempted to coat them in a hideous blur filter to soften shit up>>4305334It is NOT a good look.>>4305335kekbut seriouslythe only good way to have such a blur not look like shit is to use PHYSICAL FILTERSblurring in post is always garbage and is why "bokeh" on phones in gay portrait modes is a scam and always looks bad
I'll only use bloom if it were a natural trait if a certain lens or with a filter, as I have yet to see a digital bloom method that looks right.
I bought a D700 off ebay some time in 2019ish before the youtube people made it inflate in price.I don't see a reason to upgrade, everything seems like diminishing returns. Don't need any more megapixels, autofocus is fast enough, build quality is great, body is a tank, color science is great, great lens ecosystem.What are honestly the advantages of upgrading? More muh megapixels? I don't see the point when this thing is perfect. Even the newest hottest most basedest 2024 shit is like 10% better at most, and thats in niche scenarios.
>>4304885>>4304914Nevermind, the lens is busted.
>>4304885>>4304914>>4305340https://files.catbox.moe/agixi3.mp4RIP
>>4305222>Why do you think canon was the #1 brand when nikon had better sensors?because Canon lenses had internal autofocus motors when Nikon was still fucking around with screwdrive, and Nikon never recovered
>>4305353This, also electronic aperture but I'm not sure it's an advantage at all
>>4304246It matters more if your camera is just a hobby (dedicated outings) or also a lifestyle thing (take camera to places just because). In the latter case upgrading to a newer mirrorless does help. the back screens are a lot better and they're faster to shoot. not FPS fast shooting (but that too). the VF is optional, the lens is stopped down for the view and there's a focus magnifier that makes manual a lot faster, the auto-autofocus is magic and exposure preview means you don't have to spot meter in difficult scenes. these dont matter as much if its just your hobby to go on photowalks, a DSLR can manage even with sports/wildlife. a DSLR might even better if you're night shooting, since there's no low light EVF lag/noise.
For love of the pentaprism.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4304972Its just underexposing to protect highlights and pushing shadows and midtones with a different luma curve that roughly corresponds to 1 iso stop worth of gain.
i just got a k70 as my first dslr and my goodness there are so many settings.are there any guides of what some good defaults are?
>>4305202I wouldn't take these recommendations as facts, but it probably gives you some of the more important settings to consider.https://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-70-review/recommended-settings.html
>>4305207that's good thanks, I have to give the manual a good read
>>4304974That makes sense. In >>4304972 f/8 became f/11, but at the same time ISO is increased to 200. Why is this? Doesn't this keep the "effective" exposure at 0 EV?
Sunset editionOld >>4298859[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX0M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:06 14:13:32Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness5.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash FunctionFocal Length7.90 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessNormal
>>4304931but i usually zoom the pic to see details, not all the pictures are viewed in the frame that its supposed
>shoot against window>"I'll just underexpose so that the outside isn't blown out">now can't make it not look like shit without blowing out the windowFucking with sliders isn't gonna fix that is it, I'd have to use masking and shit. Kinda hard when there's a person sticking in front of the window.
>>4304990tone equalizerjust don't go overboard with it either >>4303063
>>4304991Nice, that's it. Much appreciated.
>>4304990If you can go back in time, try some fill flash. It may help
Toughts on this camera?Found one for around 400$. Not sure if i should spend more to get Vi or Vii for the better zoom.Also what differences are between V and VA models?I would buy one to carry around everyday , videos in vacantion. How is the video quality? Also what other cameras should i look for? Any Canon's worthy with same specs ...etc?
>>4301592The III is hopeless for video, lol[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 16:11:03Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness9.9 EVExposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length11.45 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
i miss my rx100m3 :[I sold most of my digital cameras for drugs or music gear a while ago now. rx100 is what I missed the most.Shame what has ahppened to the secondhand camera market, especially compacts
It will do 95% of everything you could ever want to do with a camera. Just get it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:01:11 19:55:49Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/6.3Brightness9.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4301637in portraits you have control over subject to background distance
just got gifted an rx100 II, been pretty neat>>4297335with like an rx100 III, you get slightly better than an aps-c camera + typical f3.5-f5.6 kit lens