[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: vs.jpg (23 KB, 800x300)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
Dubs decide my next purchase.
>>
>>4397423
kys
>>
>>4397423
What other OM lenses do you already own? Normally I'd pack a 28/50/100/180 combo, I love using my OM-4Ti
>>
>>4397426
based OM-4Ti enjoyer

I have a 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/2.8, 200mm f/4 and a 300mm f/4.5
I don't particularly enjoy the 28mm f/2.8 unless I'm inside which, during winter, I'm a lot. So maybe the upgrade to f/2 would be worth it since fast speed colour film comes at a premium these days.
On the other hand I use the 50mm f/1.4 A LOT so maybe the 35mm f/2 would be the way to go?
It's literally a coin toss for me.
>>
56mm f/4
70mm f/4
>>
both motherfucker
>>
i don't have any horse in this race but i like my 50mm 1.8 zuiko for my om-2n
>>
>>4397446
kys
>>4397467
out of my budget at this moment
>>4397485
I have like four of these
>>
neither and switch to nikon
>>
>>4397519
if i were in your shoes I'd be looking for the 35 then I guess, but that's mainly because I already have a 50 i like and a 28 I enjoy for a different mount so it'd be nice to get an inbetween and differentiate what I use my bodies for even more
>>
I have the 21mm f/2.0 and the 28mm f/2.0. Haven't messed around with the latter much, but the former is one overrated, overpriced piece of shit, but I was playing with the idea of getting more of the f/2.0s such as the 24 and the 35 just to build a set.
>>
>>4397520
most retarded post yet
>>4397521
the 28 is definitely a harder lens to compose with
>>4397522
wasted dubs
>>
>>4397520
>switch to an 800 dollar fully mechanical camera that needs a shutter replacement every two rolls with my AF-D from the 90s with image quality from the 60's
Nah, got rid of all my Nikon shit. It's total garbage.
>>
On general principal, it seems like the 35mm would make a good stopgap between too wide and too narrow. The slightly narrower FOV would also make more natural background separation.
>>
The 35mm f2 is better optically. Even if you don't use it as much at least it covers a new focal length, maybe get a 85mm for that 35/85 pairing
>>
>>4397568
Who are you quoting?
Anyways there are a ton of affordable and reliable nikon film cameras from the 80s and 90s. I quite enjoy not having to wind film or manually advance after every shot.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.