/hm/ is for sharing porn.People posting new threads should post several images (6+) to get the thread started. Don't just post one image and expect other people to do the work of making a successful thread.Hookup, camwhore, and 'rate me' threads should go on /soc/.Advice threads should go on /adv/. (work-safe).Discussion of LGBT topics should go on /lgbt/. (work-safe).Requests for sources, or more images should go on /r/.
Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.
Se that feom guatemala contact me jester878787 @gmail.com
Do you wish your cock was this big?
>>1786546https://66.media.tumblr.com/83ef10ea3e3cf1e830c1ad257dbf44fe/tumblr_mw142yP6Bk1qeztljo1_500.jpg
>>1786571I"d love to try though
>>1786546Is this you op? Time date stamp please also more pics please would love this cock up my ass
No, my 9 inches is pushing the limit of whats practical and even then a lot of guys wont try to take it. That would just be a fucking headache.
>>1787081All the blood rushing down to harden that organ into a stiff, desirable muscle . .. the man would be quite light headed.
The thought of a /b/tard having his way with me really turns me on. I wish I could be /b/ cumdumpster. Here are some dicks I've saved from rate threads on /b/.
>>1774839>The thought of a /b/tard having his way with me really turns me on. What a fucking retard lmfao
>>1774849Agreed. Yummy, it is . ..
Hard dicks that point up, begging to be touched
Bump
>>1784658Do you have severe autism?
Nothing better than a hunk or twink with a tiny cock, anyone agree?
I have this pic set if you're interested.
>>1787349It’s pretty tiny
>>1787576Please share
>>1786610Found it. GayHoopla - Max Summerfield, Aaron Dickson. Aaron is cute af
>>1786610>>1787391>>1788067
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-robicheaux-charges-20180919-story.html
Gays are mentally unstable.
>>1787891>Proud to be Pro-Circumcision and Pro-Kavanaugh!One out of two ain't bad.
>all these /pol/acks on a gay boardReally makes me think.
>>1787902>goes on 4chan>thinks anyone is mentally stable here
>>1778192Ewww, who would tap that?
Previous: >>1778420
>last reply 50mins ago>page 5>on a slow boardwhat is going on again here?
>>1787524someone ruining nice threads, bumping shitty threads and creating even shittier ones...
>>1787154Good God, this is my fetish
Should I do porn? I’m 6’3 178 pounds and have an 8 inch cock. I’m bi so I could do a viriety of scenes
>>1787776There comes a point where you just have to get over yourself and accept whatever consequences come your way. Joke about it if it ever comes up, otherwise keep it hidden.It's a terrible thing to live with regret, but overanalyzing is even worse. Chaturbate money is good. I would recommend it. If somebody won't date you because of it then they're not worth dating. If someone won't employ you because of it, then you'd probably be miserable in that line of work. Just be as naive as you can. The old men who watch you will like it, and life generally will flow a little easier.
Try out a porn vid now, maybe post a cumvid?
>>1787370of course
Your lack of a full nude makes me think you're just seeking attention. Post nudes with face if you want to do porn
>>1787370do you have a gallery somewhere? Anyway I think this is more of a >>>/soc/ or >>>/adv/ thread
Last Thread: >>1776027To stop all the source threads deleting good content, a general source thread is required. /r/ doesn't do gay shit and mods ban/delete individual source threads.How to obtain your source:1) Post your picture or description2) Post what you want (name, company, etc)3) Post any information you have (where/when the picture is from, etc)4) Wait for a mars/hm/allow to help you and then say thanks.Together we can stop the 404ing of good porn.Please use Google image search (and common sense) before posting in this thread.There is also a gay porn encyclopedia which can be found here: 95.31.3.127/pbc/Main_PageComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1787900pic related
>>1787889top is rogan richards...fucking love him
anyone???
>>1788009Corbin Fisher: Max & Beau
I've seen the video to this on tumblr, but it got taken down. Does anyone happen to have it saved, or know who any of the people are?
How many guys here have tried to suck themselves? How many succeeded?Also autofellatio/self-sucking image thread
>>1787829I could until I was about 25. Stretched 3-4 times per week, but finally could not do it any more. I would suck at least once per week, and I could usually cum in a few minutes.
>>1787881source please!!
Interesting shape of the glandAny ideas?
>>1788044
>>1788045
Horsecock :O
>>1788046
>>1788048
Chubby butts and thighs
Me
>>1787941Goddamn, more?
>>1787980Thanks ;)
Old Thread: >>1735927give us your scrawny, your awkward, your pale and spotty. gives us your nearsighted, farsighted, and your just plain kind of weird-lookingdon't just post guys with glasses or guys in marvel shirts. that's not what this is about
>>1787962>it's not anyone's job to explain their taste to you.Then it's a good thing I wasn't the one asking. You walked straight into that one, champ. That not withstanding, normal people routinely ask questions on these threads and other normal people answer them.>...don't be surprised when everyone calls you out for being a dick.Speaking of being a dick, screaming at me is an extremely pooor substitute for giving the original anon a straight answer. Little wonder I need to explain that to you in particular. If just one person had written something like, "maybe people just get bored of looking at 9s or 10s and want something a little weirder? etc." there wouldn't have been any issue at all. >a baiting, derailing retard...and THIS, coming from a moron who a.) didn't read the thread very closely at all, b.) confused me with the guy who asked the question c.) re-started an argument that died quietly.For a guy who loves pointing out the obvious, you do have trouble noticing it. Everything was quiet until YOU showed up. For all your outrage over "being a dick" and "shitting up the thread" and "derailing" it, you couldn't leave things be without having YOUR say. Well, now you've had it and made a fool of yourself by the time you were finished. Well done.
>>1787983>because he was a clearly a fucking troll either insulting people or baiting out responses so he could insult people.He was blunt & obnoxious, but as you've just shown many here share those failings.>The only person who cares is you...about the original question? Or silently humouring your drivel? If it's the former, you're wrong. If it's the latter so sorry, no reason I should.>you spent several post defending your life choices to an anonymous stranger in an effort to make yourself seem better in the eyes of anonymous strangers.I don't mind explaining something, particularly when the circumstances are in my favor. Like now, for example. I'm getting paid while I'm fucking around here. Are you? Honestly? No? >again nobody, not even the anon who posted it, cares about this question but you....which, since you haven't noticed, is why so little of the discussion has been about original question except in the context of the answer I gave to it.>give solid statistical proof or studies to back up your theory and I will gladly have this discussion with you.Psychology isn't a hard science, which you already know. The responses I received here certainly validates it. So, no, it isn't just my "opinion and anecdotes". I've got a thread full of shrill, pissy anons like yourself. After the fact, true, but the overblown reaction here is a classic case of "The lady doth protest too much, methinks".Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1788005>He was blunt & obnoxious, but as you've just shown many here share those failings.irrelevant. he could have been coy and polite but clearly his intent was to troll>...about the original question? Or silently humouring your drivel? If it's the former, you're wrong. If it's the latter so sorry, no reason I shouldthe question that you just called blunt and obnoxious. the one you keep linking to. the one you keep saying everyone should answer. the one you reference later in your reply. >I don't mind explaining something, particularly when the circumstances are in my favor. Like now, for example. I'm getting paid while I'm fucking around here. Are you? Honestly? No? this continues to be a poor attempt to validate the time spent in a thread you have no interest in interacting with people you think are beneath you>...which, since you haven't noticed, is why so little of the discussion has been about original question except in the context of the answer I gave to it.and yet this doesn't stop you from attempting to steer discussion back to that question>Psychology isn't a hard science, which you already know.i know that when psychologist want to make an argument they use studies. they give sources. they follow the scientific method.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1788005>but clearly his intent was to troll"clearly" nothing. Intent is probably the most difficult thing in the world to prove, legally speaking. You're building your entire case around one short, possibly rhetorical, sentence.>the question that you just called blunt and obnoxious. the one you keep linking to. the one you keep saying everyone should answer. the one you reference later in your reply.It's the answer, not the question, that received a disproportionate response. It's the one I keep saying everyone DIDN'T answer. Or, very nearly everyone. >this continues to be a poor attempt to validate the time spent in a thread you have no interest in interacting with people you think are beneath youI've taken an interest in the replies I've received on the thread, original topic notwithstanding. And so? You certainly seem quite invested in replying as well. How I spend my time is my business, technically my employer's.>and yet this doesn't stop you from attempting to steer discussion back to that questionWith good reason. It's the one thing nearly everyone has been pointedly avoiding.>they give sources. they follow the scientific method.Let's just jump ahead and save some time. You want to argue over the scientific definition of "theory". Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1788024>"clearly" nothing. Intent is probably the most difficult thing in the world to prove, legally speaking. You're building your entire case around one short, possibly rhetorical, sentence.he was a troll. his intent is clear. this isn't a court. The only person who cares is you>...about the original question? Or silently humouring your drivel? If it's the former, you're wrong. If it's the latter so sorry, no reason I should.the question that you just called blunt and obnoxious. the one you keep linking to. the one you keep saying everyone should answer. the one you reference later in your reply. >It's the answer, not the question, that received a disproportionate response. It's the one I keep saying everyone DIDN'T answer. Or, very nearly everyone. you're getting lost in your own stupidity>I've taken an interest in the replies I've received on the thread, original topic notwithstanding. And so? You certainly seem quite invested in replying as well. How I spend my time is my business, technically my employer's.you were the one trying to validate the time you spend here using your job and how much you make. >With good reason. It's the one thing nearly everyone has been pointedly avoiding.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
