>>4394264
How can I qualify for their grants and what kind of work that they like? Please post some examples. And how one can write a solid application and what they want to hear?

>>4394265
I started my career thanks to an Explorer grant! They look for projects that tell stories about your land, something unique that you are best qualified to share. They’re also very interested in how you can disseminate your work to create a positive impact on your community.

>>4394266
>They’re also very interested in how you can disseminate your work to create a positive impact on your community.
Lol. Are they dumb? What does this even mean?

You have haven't answered:
>Please post some examples.
>And how one can write a solid application?

>>4394268
>Lol. Are they dumb? What does this even mean?
An example could be documenting an overlooked social or environmental story specific to your region.

When writing the application, keep it as humble as possible. Show genuine interest in the topic and explain why it’s important to bring it to light.

>>4394264
>not Magnum photographer
lol, lmao even
Go on, post the email showing your supposed credentials again

>>4394271
Again, just trying to help! I’ve spent time on /p and anons here helped me. I don’t see why anyone would lie about something like this xd

>>4394270
How do you cope with the guilt that you're using suffering of other people to make money?

>>4394280
I don't document misery or anything related to it

>>4394281
Then what was your project?

>>4394283
An environmental investigation through photography

>>4394284
Is photography your main job now?

>>4394286
photography and writing stories

>>4394287
>writing stories
now that I believe

>>4394264
larp.

File: Xmas.jpg (43 KB, 1080x715)

43 KB JPG

Favorite shot?
Merry christmas!

File: trent_parke_moving-bus-sy(...).jpg (99 KB, 1024x684)

99 KB JPG

>>4394291
Many, but I've always loved this one by Trent Parke

>>4394264
Didn't you make a thread like this a few months ago and got called out and humiliated?

>>4394264
>>4394304
Yup, back in September. You no-photo'd the thread, and your only evidence was being on a mailing list, and a picture of 3 cameras (xpro, mamiya, gfx), of which you don't even own the gfx

Last thread sucked, this one will too, please go unless you plan to actually contribute to the board

>>4394304
He did, there was zero proof given

I'm a Natgeo photographer too and you should know OP is considered a joke around the office. Me, Chad, Brad, Stacy and Tracy all get together and talk shit about OP's awful images

>>4394357
Chad here, can confirm