[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now being accepted. Apply here.


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: HASID.jpg (313 KB, 960x1280)
313 KB
313 KB JPG
0YRMJ2
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4380610
cause it was in kazimierz fucktard
>>
>>4380610
Have you tried a mirror?
>>
I thought vampires didn't show up in photos
>>
>>4380821
one of their tricks is to convince you that's true
>>
>>4380548
...jewish? JEWISH?!!!!!

File: atiba.jpg (410 KB, 1365x2048)
410 KB
410 KB JPG
Hi gang!
Since this place is so unhinged I felt like straying a bit and covering some unconventional photography.
Let's take some time to explore Atiba Jefferson.

Previous thread:
>>4379165

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
11 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4380639
>Photographer: Johansen Krause
Hmmm I'm pretty sure this is also from Atiba's series so I have no idea why the exif says this...
>>
Ps: Atiba wasn't the first to use the combo Hassleblad/fisheye for skateboarding photos but he certainly was the one who popularized the combo the most, combo that would become the trademark visual for skateboard photography
>>
Good shit OP. Don’t stop, keep these threads coming.
>>
bump for atiba
>>
Meh
Good job with the threads tho

>>4380642
>wasn't the first to use the combo
>he certainly was the one who popularized the combo the most
The credit goes to the one who idealized it if both the early and refined versions look the same.

File: juhkj.jpg (8 KB, 270x187)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
I have been uploading landscapes I took and tagging the location but flipping the image horizontally so its the opposite way round to what you would see standing there.

There are going to be some confused people out there when they finally visit these places.
>>
>oh, he flipped it
thats it

File: 1531923785045.jpg (232 KB, 797x766)
232 KB
232 KB JPG
Do you take snapshots, or photographs?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2018:07:18 15:21:47
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width797
Image Height766
17 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1730210399017536.gif (392 KB, 200x210)
392 KB
392 KB GIF
>>4380240
metoo

I became a regular /p/ee poster in 2017. I really wanted to have a career as a photographer. Nothing has changed except age and number of failures.
>>
>>4379547
what is this shit? AI slop?
>>
>>4380241
Do you have a best photo you can share? Surely you have produces at least one awesome pic in 20 years.
>>
>>4380808
He ded now, don't you see him hanging?
Unless he failed at that too...
>>
>>4380809
I thought he was just napping. You've ruined my whole day. :(

Can you give me tips for using the Black Mist
filter? Bought one today and tips would be helpful, thanks.

>49mm 1/4
13 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4379904
imagine having to do drugs because your life is so miserable lol
>>
>>4379902
No meaningful or important photo has ever been taken in daylight
FACT
>>
File: 1722351772286.jpg (1.82 MB, 4189x2793)
1.82 MB
1.82 MB JPG
>>4380758
>blocks your path

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-9M3
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.11 (20240626.m.2679 509bf35) (Macintosh)
PhotographerEvan Vucci
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:07:13 18:16:16
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness9.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4189
Image Height2793
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4380752
>drugs bad
Incel, underage, or just dumb?
>>
>>4379856
Wow it looks exactly like film

File: IMG_3817.jpg (32 KB, 225x225)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
Have not been on Insta for ages, recently went back on and decided to look up all the photographers I use to follow. They have all quit, some have taken up a totally diff hobby and converted their page to being about that.
Did everybody move to tik tok?
What has happened?
I tried the search but half the results were video clips and then it was mainly posts from months ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width225
Image Height225
Scene Capture TypeStandard
10 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4380088
To be fair very few care about fine dining, it's tasteful but won't satiate your hunger
Also dining itself is getting expensive, 8 fucking dollars for an order of fries
>>
This thread is like a 95IQ version of this one: >>4372118
>>
>>4380600
t. poo-for-brains toilet dodger
>>
>>4376469
We live in a consumption based society, people consume content telling them what to buy. Photography sells a lifestyle, or the promise of a lifestyle, and people want to live what they see, so they'll just buy what's pushed on them.
>>
>>4380591
Yeah dont waste your time cooking most people just want a dollar meal from mcDs. fuck real food, bourgie gearfags. just be normal and order a panda bowl ffs cooking is dumb ass autistic white people shit. no one cares about your cooking gearfag. on social media 90% of food is from franchise restaurants.
>you let yourselves be demoralized with this argument

File: FCotFscWUAgQF4rR.jpg (103 KB, 1000x982)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
Has anyone ever starting shooting film then to go back to fully shooting digital? It feels like every time someone starts shooting film they either
>keep shooting film forever, at best occasionally using digital
or
>slowly stop taking photos all together

Has anyone here ever gone back to digital?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
10 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: PA190129s.jpg (2.8 MB, 3269x4609)
2.8 MB
2.8 MB JPG
>>4380530
I use both a pretty even amount. There are things I like about film that I cant get from digital and there are things I like about digital that I can't get from film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera ModelE-M1MarkII
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length30.00 mm
White BalanceAuto
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4380567
skills issue
>>
I started digital, mostly film 2009 to 2016, then have been 99% digital since.
Cost was a big incentive back then, $200 F100 vs +$2k D700, and I could shoot Ektar for under $4 (roll + dev).
I like using film cameras more so than the actual film part, and now I have lots of digital options that scratch the same itch.
Did photo lab all in highschool, and 6 years with an actual lab, so the film processing side of things has lost all it's charm.
I've played around with enough different cameras, even 4x5 very briefly.
Too impatient for the film process now, and don't feel like it offers me anything I can't just get digitally.
>>
>>4380530
I got an mft camera, tried it out, sold it. Bought a decent 70s era half frame camera and the image quality is significantly better.
>>
>>4380530
Most SANE film shooters when they realize lab scans suck, make film basically worse digital, and actually using film as itself instead of a convoluted version of using a smaller SD card and not looking at it for a week is actually a whole other hobby adjacent to photography - and a spendy and techy one with chemicals and timers and temps and darkrooms and grain focusers and color sliders and contrast papers…

So they buy a digital camera and dont go back until they’re ready to self dev and do their own scans at the least

Which is the best unified film/digital lens mount, Pentax K or Nikon F and why?
25 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4380402
sounds like he struck a nerve
perhaps, all the nerves

so are you a delusional gearfag who thinks buying a specific camera is the magic talent button or a whiny gear queer who is always mad about snoykonon but doesn't even have skin in the game
>>
>>4380237
>Which is the best unified film/digital lens mount, Pentax K or Nikon F and why?
The problem is mostly that your question is wrong. If you HAVE to use the same lenses on your film bodies as your digital bodies, the obvious solution would be EF if you wanted the best quality, as you would adapt your EF lenses to an RF body for digital and shoot with an EOS 1 or something for film. As I said though, your question is wrong, the correct way to shoot film and digital is Zuiko with an OM body of your choosing (they're all the same aside from the the metering) as Zuiko is the only lenses that are endorsed by God. Then for digital shoot anything but Sony as they're the only brand that fucks your photos up so badly you cant even fix them in post. Hope this helps.
>>
>>4380335
>variety of stabilized lenses that work both on digital AND analog
Pentax does have TWO bodies with IBIS, Nikon has none
>>
>>4380587
>IBIS
They call it SR for Shake Reduction
>>
>>4380353
hahahahahaha
ahahahahah
what a faggot lmao
hahahaha
>>4380587
wow they have shake reduction film body???

Feels good man
56 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4380336
>i-its the old ppl guise!
Old farts are invariably in love with leica.

It's because a centered viewfinder is sorta shit no matter which hand/eye you shoot with (remember portrait orientation is a thing) and a viewfinder off to the side is very nice for right eye shooters and absolutely unusable for left eye shooters. Short of making a true left handed model, the only way sony can get everyones noses off the screen is to make a tilting EVF.
>>
>>4379235
>using Roman numerals for half the number instead of just calling it the A12 or AXII
The absolute state of snoy lmao
>>
>>4380306
I very rarely had that issue, more often for me my hand would just brush against the screen at some point and I'd wonder why the fuck the camera would refuse to focus on what was in the centre of the frame, because for some reason they made the focus point indicator a light grey that's often near impossible to see. Also I was once shooting in the rain (no the camera didn't explode) and of course that fucked with the touch screen too.

I thought I'd be moving my focus point around often but honestly, unless you're on a tripod you just have it in the centre and focus and recompose and it tracks your subject.
>>
>>4380339
The Leica fetish is its own thing. Old people are used to the central viewfinder because that's what typical SLRs had. It's not some stupid photo agency responsible for it.
>>
>>4379632
Which means nothing as most photojournalists are "forced" (agency tools) to use Sony.
Z9 is better, doesn't mean the a1 is bad at all
>>4379848
Alpha series second generation has thicker sensor stacks, that's a no-no in trying to make newer lenses and adapting old ones.
>>4379871
>blob
No sissy nigger zone here buddy, move along

File: harru.jpg (4.2 MB, 3840x2160)
4.2 MB
4.2 MB JPG
Opinions on him and his work?
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4378840
>Search it on internet, retard
OP has to post shit first, why ask a question someone has to investigate anything about it first? there's plenty of threads to post
>>
>>4378842
hmm you're right
>>
>>4378819
Nah he looks like an evil baby. Pass.
>>
>>4378819
Vomit emoji

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300
Vertical Resolution300
>>
>>4380569
Pretty decent aside from the watermarks and black frame

File: wowheckinawesomewooow.jpg (362 KB, 1500x1001)
362 KB
362 KB JPG
Watched a couple of videyas about some street photographers on youtube just to get a feel what they are all about and in reality they are just a bunch of worthless clowns sticking their film era cameras into peoples faces. The entire genre that they identify themselves with should more aptly be named random face photography because that is all there is to it.. it is just faces and expressions. More often than not there is not even anything interesting going on in the photos.
How did we get to the point that these people are praised? They are just glorified snapshitters cranking out poop.
OH WOW SOME PEOPLE ON A CROSSING JUST STANDING THERE HOW HECKIN' AWESOME WOW I HOPE TO ONE DAY BECOME AS GOOD OF A PHOTOGRAPHER AS YOU GUYS WOOOOOW PLEASE LECTURE ME ABOUT FILM STOCKS.
12 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_0677.gif (2.98 MB, 960x540)
2.98 MB
2.98 MB GIF
Behold, goyim. The batmoshe flushed out yet another antisemite.
>>
>>4379710
>Modern art was invented by the french, not us. We only pushed it hard as a huge FUCK YOU to the remaining nazis.

Modern art was gaining popularity long before the nazis even took power... and it had nothing to do with jews. It was predominantly Catholics in Spain and France enjoying the freedom to express themselves granted to them by the invention of the camera. Capturing reality figuratively was no longer a necessity. Artists began to experiment with new ways of communicating with images. If photography has one relationship to art which can be assured, its that it set art free from having to be the recorder of history.
>>
>>4379732
Please dont be purposefully ignorant of my peoples success in the US.
>>
>>4379669
this doesn't refute them plus pls stop playing into the arrogant and combative street photographer stereotype
>>
>>4379669
I actually do take photos of people in the street but I’m still wondering why it is that beauty has left the planet
And I’m sure that Jewish people being in control of like 90% of galleries, media corporations, popular magazines, newspapers, etc has something to do with it

I like street photography though. Showcasing reality is entertaining

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-RX100
Camera SoftwareVSCO
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:09:20 16:32:04
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating125
Brightness8.1 EV
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length10.40 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height2688
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessSoft

File: 53972414657_46ca978bbe_k.jpg (261 KB, 2048x1365)
261 KB
261 KB JPG
GO GO GO GO GO!!! ANYTHING THAT POPS INTO YOUR HEAD!!! I WILL BE NAMING THEM TOO!!! TEAR ME TO SHREDS!!!!
65 replies and 46 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: GTq165JXAAAWJqr.jpg (432 KB, 1000x667)
432 KB
432 KB JPG
>>
File: GTq-10gWgAApsBN.jpg (318 KB, 1000x667)
318 KB
318 KB JPG
>>
File: GU4hzsEXkAAe36T.jpg (1.36 MB, 2000x1333)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB JPG
>>
File: GU4hqsFW8AAsb8M.jpg (1.61 MB, 2000x1333)
1.61 MB
1.61 MB JPG
>>
File: GTNLjjNXMAEJQCO.jpg (598 KB, 4096x2731)
598 KB
598 KB JPG

File: 1711804007775056.png (289 KB, 740x737)
289 KB
289 KB PNG
Had about $1300 to spare, so bought a secondhand sony a6600 with sony 20mm f/2.8 lens for $800. Got $500 left. What's a good lens I can pair this with? Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8? Trying to go for variety and thinking maybe I should go for something that does mid macro shots instead, but obviously my budget might be lacking.
>>
Lighting gear and a nice tripod
>>
I heard the ibis on the 6600 is kinda shit compared to the 6700

Personally I was thinking of buying a 6400+tamron 17-70 f2.8 to upgrade from my rx100 but /p/ shilled me into the full frame meme for another $400 more (also I wanted good low light)

Crop still has some good bokeh at 2.8 on lenses like that
>>
>>4380211
Haven’t heard of that lens. Got a link?
>>
>>4380207
Sony E 35mm macro. And even though /p/ will shit on it, I like the kit lens. It's super cheap and also small like the 20mm and gives you some variety to help you find your favorite focal length. If you know you like wide/normal/tele, you can get a solid lens for that.

What was the point of increasing the size of the Nikon mount if they are still only putting 35mm sensors inside the body?
Surely if they wanted to make bigger lenses it would only make sense to make sensors that go up to an optional 100mp?
19 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4379711
To allow for superior lens designs
>>
>Make a new body with a larger than ff sensor
>Use the old lens mount
>None of the current lenses are designed to cover the larger sensor
What's the point? You're going to have to bring out a bunch of new lenses and label them as larger than ff anyway, it's just going to confuse people, Yeah you'll be able to use then on the ff and crop bodies but you'll just be paying more for a larger and slower lens, no one's adapting modern medium format lenses to ff bodies.
>>
>>4379917
Just imagine how much greater the mogging would be if Sony had a larger mount
>>
>>4380028
There's a difference between covering, and being designed to cover. There are some crop lenses that can cover full frame but then you get shitty edges.
>>
>>4379933
superior lenses in just 2 more years nikon bros


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.