>>4372887
>>4372885
Most Sigma lenses from back then are simpy not good. Terrible even. I'd ditch it desu, if you wanted an esoteric mount I would have gone with the Minolta A adapter, some excellent sleepers that don't cost too much if you find them in Japan. EF - should be common knowledge what is and isn't good

>>4372885
Sigma SA lenses are usually more expensive than the same lenses on Canon EF. Maybe you can find a good deal or two on the Art lenses, but I would say just resell it.

>>4372885
>>4372926
No!
Leave SA mount optics for those of us forced to use it (Foveon).
It's hard enough trying to find something decent to stick on them.
About 75% of SA lenses on the market are SHIT.
>t. just bought a 20mm f/1.8 without doing research, thinking Sigma didn't fuck up their pre-global vision primes too
>they did
I hope the 1.7x crop obviates most of the problem, but it's still one of the worst "EX" primes they made.

File: ptard.jpg (700 KB, 1000x1233)

700 KB JPG

>>4375490

>>4375576
Saved.

File: 1C9A6477.jpg (4.76 MB, 3918x2612)

4.76 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:02 21:22:02
Exposure Time	1/8000 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 1C9A6850.jpg (4.55 MB, 3146x3146)

4.55 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:02 21:22:22
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>667x1000
Are you kidding me

File: 1C9A6811.jpg (365 KB, 1000x667)

365 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:19 18:17:19
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 1C9A0297.jpg (552 KB, 1000x1000)

552 KB JPG

>>4375597
Eh, I stuck to the standards of more than 5 years ago. Bit of a habit I guess.

Here's a 1000x1000 one for ya.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:19 18:17:05
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4375709
Good luck, and enjoy it if you win! I have like 3 of those cameras lol...

I posted it for someone who may be considering getting into sheet film. It is a truly fantastic view camera, and this could be an insane deal with the 4 lenses.

The sinar P is much heavier than the F2, but you get really great movement precision, and it has a box that fits everything, lenses included!

>>4375709
Oh yeah, and if you wanted to get into 8x10 the P has a removal rear standard carrier, so you can just swap out the 4x5 carrier for an 8x10 one.
A good deal on an 8x10 rear standard carrier + 8x10 GG/film holder + 8x10 bellows is like 600-800 USD. About the cost of your bottom of the barrel wooden 8x10 cameras. Keep an eye on ebay and they pop up every couple months.

>>4375711
>>4375716
Jk, I don't have enough money to burn for 8x10 u.u. I was thinking of getting one just to shoot those huge fucking Polaroid sheets, but I think an Intrepid would be fine for that type of thing.

>>4375721
:[ Those lenses would probably only work okay with 8x10 anyways. Polaroid + intrepid sounds like a fun combo. Maybe even the most fun/least autistic view camera combo possible.

NEW THREAD
>>4375751
>>4375751
>>4375751
>>4375751

File: scan0126.jpg (837 KB, 1395x2048)

837 KB JPG

>>4375377

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1395
Image Height	2048

File: scan0156.jpg (773 KB, 2048x1378)

773 KB JPG

>>4375377

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1378

File: scan0134.jpg (763 KB, 2048x1384)

763 KB JPG

and that's it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1384

thanks for sharing your pics anon
i think most of your pics are somewhat boring
exposure and contrast is good, but the subject is nothing i really care about
there are a few i like though
this >>4375394
this >>4375379
and maybe this >>4375397

>>4375483
pretty much this
aesthetically nice pics but just not very interesting

File: DSC_1253_DxO.jpg (1.41 MB, 4883x3263)

1.41 MB JPG

>>4375432
front wheel comes up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 50
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	180 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:16 06:19:34
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	19.95 m
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	120.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4883
Image Height	3263
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO1
Focus Mode	AF-C
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	1656

File: DSC_1256_DxO.jpg (1.13 MB, 4750x3167)

1.13 MB JPG

>>4375433
and its gone

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 50
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	277 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:16 06:24:08
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	19.95 m
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	185.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4750
Image Height	3167
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO1
Focus Mode	AF-C
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	1659

File: DSC_1261_DXO2.jpg (3.29 MB, 5568x3712)

3.29 MB JPG

>>4375434
dxo photolab does a good job saving pics i thought were unsavable, but deepprime xd2 (10 mins to process a image usually lol) makes stuff *too* smooth sometimes. if it doesnt look good with regular prime its probably not worth editing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 50
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	277 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 09:59:25
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	19.95 m
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	185.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5568
Image Height	3712
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO1
Focus Mode	AF-A
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	1664

File: DSC_1262_DXO2_1.jpg (1 MB, 5162x3440)

1 MB JPG

>>4375435
same plane on the ground, this camera really hates low light so im happy

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 50
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	157 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
White Balance	Auto

File: DSC_1265_DXO2.jpg (3.15 MB, 4876x3265)

3.15 MB JPG

>>4375436
last pic before it hits the bump limit. im gonna try lightroom next, theres a deal where you can get 1yr of lightroom + ps + 1tb cloud storage for $95 from best buy if you buy this photo paper and combine it

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/hp-sprocket-2-x-3-premium-sticky-backed-zink-photo-paper-20-pack/5789606.p?skuId=5789606

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 50
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	375 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 11:06:01
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	9000
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	19.95 m
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	250.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4876
Image Height	3265
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO1
Focus Mode	MANUAL
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	1668

File: 02c3504e-1c90-47c6-94ba-5(...).png (341 KB, 800x543)

341 KB PNG

>>4371947
This.
There have been some truly terrible cameras put out using the Rollei moniker.
Although ironically this one looks like this one has a better viewfinder than the 35AF. v

PetaPixel reviewed the camera and mentioned a lot of the problems OP was having, but it's a pretty soft critique of the camera overall.

https://petapixel.com/2024/10/12/mint-rollei-35af-review-style-over-substance/

>I had some issues with the top LCD panel showing erroneous markings; it would show my metering as +2 stops overexposed when in auto mode... I contacted Mint and the company assured me that some of these bugs are known and that everything will be rectified in future production cameras or gradually as they arise under warranty.
lol

My hopes for a good mkii version have kinda been dashed after seeing the nature of Mint's responses.
Nice you got a refund, but I'm sad the camera needs so much revision. But I'm skeptical about revisions anyway now given their responses.
Damn, I really liked it on paper though.

>>4373275
They never updated their Instantkon cameras even though sone of us sent feedback about a multitude of issues.
They're grifters. Petapixel should of not even given time to review their mediocre products.

File: 22-HEX-230.jpg (3.51 MB, 3181x1909)

3.51 MB JPG

>>4369271
Well, the camera is out of my hands.
Mint posted the refund as soon as I sent them tracking confirmation, which was nice of them.
With that ends one of the weirdest and most disappointing experiences I've ever had in tech or photography. I'm still confounded.

The product felt rushed, even though it's been in development since at least 2017. It's made of solid metal, yet the controls (including the transport and shutter itself) feel stiff, plasticy and cheap. The camera is supposedly designed 'by photographers, for photographers', but some design choices feel as if it was made by someone who has never shot a P&S film camera before.

To bring this sort of inadequate product to market fully knowing of its defects, and not supporting their very expensive products which are already on market a la >>4373447 tells me that there's quite a discrepancy between the company's image ("we're just like you! we put loving care into our products!") and who they actually are ("we don't give a shit about quality or design, have fun with your overpriced 3rd rate camera.").

In the meantime, I've never been more grateful or appreciative of my ancient, trusty Hexar. That camera has some major quirks and the lens isn't very good (despite what is said about it), but it's fast, quiet, well-made, has a great viewfinder, and is le "one you have with you".

I'll still be lurking the thread in case anyone gets their preorder. I'm curious to see whether others have the same issues.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Bottom, Right-Hand

>>4375285
Prove it.

>>4375331
He is an instagram user and thinks that it will get him somewhere and that what phone viewers think matters
>lol
Hes probably one of those fucktards who thinks shooting models is the only way anyone could get laid too

>>4375339
Damn that's wild. What percentage would you give it that he posta photo?

>>4375284
>4000x4000 is divine
Hard agree. Great res to crop to or just shoot in 1:1 on a 3:2 camera.

>>4375284
What about using the golden ratio as a crop factor?

>>4361597
>is so lowres it's a toy.
This is such a retarded thing to say I would actually piss on your camera given the chance.

>>4361591
Man the D700 was godly when it came out. Not enough to make me ditch my 5D for it but godly nonetheless

>>4375026
It's still godly. Everything I shoot with it looks good.

>>4375057
^this. 12 is plenty especially today with good up sampling.

>nikon user
>rockwell-esque factually incorrect gear opinions only the blind could hold
12mp looks awesome at 2mp but even at 8mp it makes you wish film was more alive.

File: Spider.jpg (2.49 MB, 4608x3072)

2.49 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 21.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:05:15 22:39:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3072

File: img-02902.jpg (1.5 MB, 2120x1414)

1.5 MB JPG

>>4370450
Thanks for the feedback brah! I'll probably order a flash tomorrow. Been enjoying snapping all over my backyard looking for critters. Definitely feeling autistic tho

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:11 23:59:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Brightness	0.5 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

bump so this wont die. ill post pics l8er tonight

>>4374523
Image limit reached, start the next one friend. I don't have a fresh macro shot that's worthy as the thread photo

>>4370630
>>4370626
>>4370548
>>4370473
>>4370450
>>4370301
>>4370193
>>4370169
No, the anon who called me out on the shitty edit is correct. I don't know what I was thinking but the original is better. Gotta learn proper editing...

>>4374461
Shoot it all with a fucking 80. Post 1979 porn looks like shit bc they cheaped out in the video era and just used built-in camcorder lenses, followed by several shit years of shit and shitty shit in the late 90s through 2005, when the fucktards just went “oi I got it, I’ll stick an ultra wide on it and shove the cam up everyone’s crotch & still get some of their spaghetti’d out body out at the edges so you can see it’s not just a 40min shot of disembodied genitals smashing, and we’ll light everything to death so you can see every fucking gob of mascara and disgusting vaginal and anal secretions getting mashed into a paste while our round pumping dipshit here spits in her mouth and slaps our bored & disgusted model for ten minutes. Porn is fucking garbage. Adult films were good. Look at adult films from Russ Meyer & Joe Sarno to see people who actually gave a shit about what they were filming. But that shit almost completely ends by 1980, with a few exceptions that made art into the mid-eighties. After that the women’s fashion was thoroughly fucked anyway, & now it’s just a sewer pipe of commodified trash very little of which anyone even sees. Everything beautiful goes to shit eventually. We all missed the window on this one. I explored marketability & funding to produce some quality content and sure as shit, fir as big as the porn business is, the market won’t support quality, they just want endless quantity. So that is what we get.

>>4374604
If I had the working distance I would. But I think you're right. Porn now looks like shit. There was definitely a shift once digital became viable.

>>4374461
18-35 f 1.8 because you don't need a faster lens in a studio, make sure to use dslr and 4-5 lights.

What level of beta cuckery is this

>>4374625
the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8? that's a crop lens.
If op has a 24-70 and bought either a tokina or sigma 16-28 it leads me to believe he is shooting full frame.

>>4369598
jews literally have a religious obligation to help other jews succeed whether or not they deserve it. if they do not devote xx% of their wealth to this yahweh gets mad(der) at them.

it is the jews. the jews themselves will tell you this. why wont you copy them?

>>4369602
>my photos are bad because I'm not jewish

>>4369013
Good thread op. Link to the previous?

>>4369013
Nice thread

>>4369027
Thank you OP. Based and informative.

>>4368832
You’re probably right, but I think in terms of the functionality and the way you had to shoot with these cameras, whether 2 x 3 or 4 x 5 would be pretty much the same. The extra fun bit, was that press guys like that also had to field develop a lot of the time on the go, which is just extra based if you ask me

>>4367619
That fukkin image lol
>>4368942
"Sir, what are you doing?"
"Mixing painkillers and drain-o"
"Why, sir?"
"To develop art!"
"This is a Wendy's, sir."

>>4369535
Based beyond belief if you ask me

File: 1728218762917.jpg (189 KB, 1280x720)

189 KB JPG

>>4367215
rangefinders use a mirror, so it's not mirrorless.

>>4367215
FLAWLESS VICTORY

This thread is a good example of why /p/ sucks now. Why should I even engage with this topic seriously? It's not like anyone will learn something from you, nor would it unfuck your debilitating autism.

Works perfectly on my machine and my A7III files.
Unironically skill issue.

reminder to use free as in freedom software when possible

>>4374554
>he has to use presets and profiles
lmfaoo damn son

>>4374554
Bridge+ACR >>>>> POWER GAP >>>>>>> Lightroom.

File: JHH02813.jpg (1.78 MB, 1826x2738)

1.78 MB JPG

It's so fucking ass, to be honest, regretting purchasing it a bit, if you could change the aperture from f4.5-16, you could leave it in manual mode and just shoot and let auto ISO do it's thing, but f4.5 is thin enough where missing focus is pretty noticeable

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 13:51:35
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Brightness	7.6 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: JHH02804.jpg (653 KB, 1826x2738)

653 KB JPG

I tried shooting from the waist just aiming the camera at the general direction I wanted the pic taken, and because the AF is so ass, it was either blurry, or didn't shoot because it was trying to focus.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 14:08:38
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Brightness	10.5 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: JHH02793.jpg (1.59 MB, 1826x2738)

1.59 MB JPG

>>4374882
That's just general loss of contrast fyi, not me lifting blacks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 13:51:28
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Brightness	9.7 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: JHH02766.jpg (1.45 MB, 1826x2738)

1.45 MB JPG

Heavy crop, sharpness is fine, the form factor is great, but the non-variable aperture thing is so ass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 13:51:15
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Brightness	10.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4374879
>>4374881
>>4374882
>>4374884
>>4374886

Sovl, I like they are not razor sharp and clinical looking

File: 1713225244587562.png (507 KB, 679x517)

507 KB PNG

this or an a6400? they are the same price

>>4374600
Which one has more dials (do you need them )and which one has a viewfinder (do you want it), which one has more lens options on the useed market for cheaper

>>4374509
That's because Fuji came into the market to milk hipsters who thought £250 DSLRs were bad because of their price

>>4374058
Never been the case, at least for USD pricing on new models. Entry level has been $500-800 for the last twenty years. D40 launched at $600, D60 at $750, T3 at $600, T2i at $900, etc. The lowest you'd ever see new, is $400 for a few weeks a year on an older Rebel, or like $450-550 for a two lens kit.
If you consider inflation, an entry level price of $800 today would be a similar equivalent of $500-600 10-20 years ago.

>>4374809
It will be for a very casual edc camera (90% photos 10% video), honestly think I could get away without an evf because the video on the fuji looks a lot better