>>4382812
chroma by john divola

>>4382796
>>4382850
based


>>4382766
jewtubers are retarded

>>4382812
self centered gibberish. you're not going to spawn any genre kek. people end up making retarded derivative shit by this way.

>>4382754
feng li
ren hang(rip)
marten lange

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4382867
never said i was gonna be the one inventing groundbreaking genres

my diary desu

>>4382961
*my photobook desu

>>4382713
Dont spend shit on this meme PNS chasing equivalence, AF speed, sharpness, and other garbage. It will never satisfy.

LUMIX 20MM F1.7
LUMIX 12-60 - WHICHEVER ONE YOU LIKE MORE

/micro four thirds

Traveling with more lenses than this is ass anyways

>>4382718
Olympus lenses do not work on panasonic bodies except for exif, corrections, and autofocus.

>>4382713
pana 20mm pancake: tiny and sharp, slow as tits autofocus though but great otherwise, everyone shills it because it's good
some sort of standard zoom since you're traveling, the oly 14-42 ez or pana 14-42 (not the electro-only PZ one) or compact and neat pana 12-32. honestly there's a dozen different lenses in this segment and they're all pretty damn similar without even including the pro/leica lenses, just pick whichever one feels normal to use since olympus and panasonic have opposite zoom ring directions
other than that it depends entirely on what you're shooting

>>4382718
my 40-150 is sharper than my china oly primes from 40 to about 130mm, and then at 130-150 it completely falls apart which is a shame but not the end of the world

>>4382846
so basically they work 100% other than the on-lens Fn. button, of which none of the listed lenses have? sounds good to me

>>4382922
No dual IS, weather sealing doesn't work

>>4382924
there's only a handful of olympus lenses that have image stabilization to begin with, and it's only the 90mm macro, the 12-100 pro, and the shitpost-worthy 150-400 "costs more than my car" super tele, IIRC. so not something you ever really run into unless you specifically bought one of three or four lenses that would be a mess to use on a compact rangefinder-style gx85 anyway. oly went with plain lenses and IBIS, panasonic went with no in-body IS but image stabilization on even basic kit lenses, so olympus was left out to dry once panasonic also got in body IS
>weather sealing doesn't work
put a bag over it, i don't trust lens to body sealing no matter the brand or camera

>>4382826
>DSLR video is all compromise and it sux.
People filmed entire tv shows and low budget movies on a 5d mark ii

>>4382831
and? are they still doing it now with a 5D2?
It was a neat tech choice for the time, 15 years ago. It was literally Canon's first DSLR and 2nd DSLR ever to shoot video.
Cameras have come a long way since then, and simply being used doesn't mean there weren't compromises and limitations.

>>4382882
Does the footage look bad now?

Most video specs sold to people are literally worthless. If you are doing sci fi action movie bullshit VFX, then they may be useful, but otherwise you just have an ugly looking cope for not lighting things correctly AKA “the grade”. A really basic bitch camera like an a7iii could shoot a feature film. With the external recorder and timecode gear and a gimbal. If you pay $1009 more you can get almost gimbal stabilization with wobbly corners. Progress!!!!

>>4382886
its all for vloggers lmao

kind of neat we get slow motion video for cheap now

>>4382886
>Does the footage look bad now?
In comparison to modern cameras, yes. It's mostly fine for 1080p footage, but there's more to a camera than just footage quality.

>>4383025
This shit = modern lighting in general. And you think it looks good. So congrats- you’re the problem.

I know you shitposting niggas from /film/ are in here

>>4383069
>liking things I don't like makes you the problem
Lmao get off your hipster high horse and be less autistic

Bump limit reached, new thread
>>4383164
>>4383164

>>4383112
lol you caught me. I’ve stopped myself from posting here like I do in /film/, I know that style of schizo wouldn’t last in here

File: IMG_5940.jpg (3.91 MB, 4000x6000)

3.91 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6400
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 10.0.1 (iOS)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:03 14:39:55
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Brightness	5.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4380904
>Fuck outta the way, cat. I'm shooting STREET.

File: DSC00225.jpg (1.79 MB, 5472x3648)

1.79 MB JPG

my dumb chud daughter on top of a paper bag enjoying the crinkles

File: P1390628.jpg (2.8 MB, 1800x1351)

2.8 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-GX8
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:05 09:20:04
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	2500
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1351
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Manual
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Off
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Program
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

File: DSC00598.jpg (2.47 MB, 4928x2449)

2.47 MB JPG

Took this one earlier today. It was my first time taking pictures ever.
The pigeons were right there but that cat didn't make a move. Can't tell what's he thinking.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M4
Photographer	Adolf Hitler
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
White Balance	Auto

But Adams lived much longer.

>>4382784
After Mortensen's rediscovery is when people started to grow tired of Adams' manifesto and its beliefs

File: E5F4FE62-76AA-4BE7-8447-8(...).jpg (497 KB, 1440x1800)

497 KB JPG

>>4358002
Oc, what do you think?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Instagram
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1440
Image Height	1800

>>4378884
Says the fag who whines while ignoring the thread being derailed by the thing he denies
Get fucked by a syrian or post art

>>4378992
No I know, but two wrongs don't make a right.

>>4378992
For "art", please see >>4379015

>>4378919
Gives off bad vibes.

>>4382696
Thank you, anon.

>>4382816
He's probably just comparing it to AI lenses.
Some of my AF/AF-D lenses, including 50mm 1.4 AF, you can actually hear something rattling around inside it if you shake it. But this doesn't seem to affect the ability to focus.
I don't use the 50 1.4 as much as the 50 1.8 because that extra 2/3 stop of speed isn't so critical for me, and my 1.8 is an AF-D.
I dunno about other bodies but on a d750, "highlight priority" meter mode requires an AF-D or AF-S lens for reasons that I fail to understand. It won't do it with AI, AIs, AF non-D.

>>4382729
Get the D800/e/d810 like the other anon said. More megapixels than the a7iii. Lens selection is much cheaper. If you're paying $1100, you might as well get a used sony FF so that you can share your lenses and stick to one platform.

File: s-l500.jpg (37 KB, 500x333)

37 KB JPG

>>4371596
Surprisingly Lifetouch that school photography company that comes to school to take yearbook photos and uses the Nikon DX2 in quite a few branches for senior studio photography. A "prosumer camera" from 2004 with 12mp, AFC (wild), with a 24-70 kit lens is good enough to take photos in a studio with and parents buy it not noticing it was taken on something so old. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Although for their yearbook photos they use newer cameras such as the Lumix GH5 for the dual card slots and use the Leica 12-60mm lens with a one light setup.

What's the best (ultra)wide zoom for F mount that takes a circular filter? I've been experimenting with the AFS 16-35 f4 I got off ebay and I find the image quality to be disappointing so far. I can't compromise on being able to use a circular polarizer.

>>4379518
Im dying

>>4379515
>>the fuck is this thread doing on a photography board.
NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T HECKIN DRAW PHILOSOPHICAL IMPLICATIONS FROM PHOTOGRAPHS. THEY MUST BE ENGAGED SUPERFLUOUSLY LIKE DOUBLE TAPPING ON SHITSTAGRAM AND THEN FORGETTING ABOUT IT FOREVER

>>4379344
Attitudes can be evil, desperate, hopeless, or patiently pious. You see what you are. I see two deer alive in an apocalyptic environment. You see dreading doom. Not the best outlook, but be glad that you at least still feel. Evil comes with apathy.

>>4379570
>nophoto
Opinion discarded

>>4382740
>nophoto
Opinion discarded

File: smugsoy.jpg (79 KB, 750x1000)

79 KB JPG

>>4382496
>i can point MY camera can point at the sun because MY camera is MFT, the superior format that provides the BEST images

>imagine getting this triggered by someone uaing his camera
Get some help, kid

>>4382577
>not knowing when to greentext
Just like you don't know when to take a photo

>>4382584
Who are you quoting?

File: _DSC4237-Enhanced-NR-4.jpg (649 KB, 2048x1358)

649 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D300
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 8.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	760
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:07 15:33:22
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

most any camera could get those, it's the editing, low contrast and mostly warmer tones (many shots look ugly to my eyes)
his full portfolio goes a bit wider, but nothing is challenging on a gear/technical sense at all, pick any camera in the last 15 years and spend your time learning how to edit

>>4381805
Interesting, thanks. I love the warm tones

>>4381061
Nice ad bro

>>4381061
>Anybody care to guess what he's using to craft such beautiful images?
Buy my Lightroom presets and find out!

I like this style, somewhat. I think his portraits are a lot nicer than his landscapes though.

He seems to be going for max dynamic range and low contrast, warm edits with sort of pastel tones, which is quite trendy these days.

35/1.4
70-200

>>4372614

He's right, why not a Df, same sensor as D4 and weighs 1/3 as much

>>4378721
idk i want the big fatso battery grip and dat fps

>>4372524
i have a voigtlander 27mm f2 and it's pretty much welded on my camera, it could be a fixed lens device at this point. Given the comfort of having two lenses, I'd probably keep my shitty samyang 35mm f1.2, or revert back to 7artisans 35mm f0.95 that I weirdly liked a lot despite how shitty it was. So, I'd have one tiny little pancake on a wider side, and one standard 50mm equivalent that would be very bright.

Some standard zoom with my favorite prime lens

>>4376794
theres a pin sharp 1.7 in both A and M flavours and a 1.4 thats a little more expensive but the 0.3 of light doesn't really do that much difference, theres also this XR rikenon f2 that has a very good rep

>>4378121
Umm autistic people rise up?

>>4378016
I just started developing the film. I still got to "scan" them and convert them. Hope to make a thread soon

just do urban landscapes or street with no ppl.

>>4378576
This
Industrial theme it. Power lines, cracks on the pavement, vacant parking lots, dumbster fires.

Moroccans don't believe their souls are stolen but they do see an easy victim from miles away.
The country is a dump, like a piece of India right next to Europe but also one of the most photogenic places on earth (like India I suppose)

>>4381614
Did not realize canon was so BASED.

>>4381618
Because sony still makes better cameras for most people, with better colors. So much better that shills gotta lie to cope.

File: sony_color_science_lol.jpg (114 KB, 600x900)

114 KB JPG

>>4381623
>with better colors
lmao

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4381659
Yes. This looks like nikon despite the non gelled direct flash. Sony is the best. Deal w it.

>>4381563
Considering Sony users and Nikon users actually filed class action to hold manufacturers responsible and Canon users didn't, no, it really doesn't sound like projection at all.

>>4381541
where are the rocks?

File: L1055549.jpg (748 KB, 1500x844)

748 KB JPG

>>4382050
oh my bad, here you go

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Leica Camera AG
Camera Model	M8 Digital Camera
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:16 20:30:31
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	844
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	00000000000000000000000000003815

>>4382080
you never disappoint, out of all the /p/hotographers you are my fav, keep up the good work anon.

>>4381552
This is superb. How would I get this look on video?

File: 2 and 3 are nikon.jpg (287 KB, 1280x859)

287 KB JPG

>>4382170
Hey thanks.

>>4382181
Get a camera, remove the IR filter on the sensor (alternatively get a full spectrum camera) and then put on filters to remove all UV but only some of the IR. (skip UV filter if sensor is only made sensitive to IR)
Oh and shoot raw, a Digital Bolex might be your best bet for this look.

This fuckin camera renders shaded lush greens as almost pale white on an overcast summer day
(picrel number 1 is with an IR cut filter and number 4 is without one)