[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: pc-58.png (839 KB, 560x460)
839 KB
839 KB PNG
• Theme: Morning
• Deadline: From 18 February to 10 March

Theme:
• The photos have to be taken in the morning
• The time of day should be inferable from your photo

Rules:
• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.
• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.
• Three entries per photographer max.
• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.

Optional:
• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
19 replies and 12 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: HRS_6323.jpg (1.46 MB, 2000x3000)
1.46 MB
1.46 MB JPG
>>4293222
and obviosuly forgot image

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeLeica Camera AG
Camera ModelLEICA M (Typ 262)
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:03:11 02:52:21
Exposure Time1/250 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/11.0
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height3000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Unique Image ID00000000000000000000000001895945
Altitude0.00 m
Time (UTC)00:00:00
GPS StatusMeasurement Interoperability
Date (UTC)2000:00:00
>>
File: IMG_20240306_071024.jpg (2.94 MB, 3120x4160)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB JPG
Taken the other morning but I forgot to post until now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOnePlus
Camera ModelBE2013
Sensing MethodNot Defined
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)3 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3120
Image Height4160
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:03:06 07:10:24
Exposure Time1/332 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Lens Aperturef/2.1
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length3.46 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width0
Image Height0
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4285064
The next challenge will start March 17 solely because I did not have the time to do it last Sunday and starting it in the middle of the week doesn't feel as nice
Will post the new voting and results of challenge 56 tomorrow after I come back from work
Also, question, does anyone else need to spend like 5 minutes convincing cloudflare that you are human only to get a minute timeout every time you post?
>>
File: March 25 2024.jpg (1.31 MB, 4032x2564)
1.31 MB
1.31 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 14 Pro
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating125
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
White BalanceAuto
>>
What happened to voting for this one?

>>4285064

File: IMG_7279.jpg (1.93 MB, 3648x5472)
1.93 MB
1.93 MB JPG
Faulty aperture or shutter? It's a newly acquired vintage lens, and this partial vignetting happened twice out of 20 pics i took.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 14.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:02 12:36:38
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias-1 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
3 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Shutter timing is off. Time for a repair or CLA but honestly the body might not be worth the trouble.
>>
>>4300692
>The fact it's only on the right side, which would be at the bottom for the vertically travel shutter when in portrait
>he holds the camera upside down (grip up)
everyone, laugh at this loser with me
>>
File: IMG_7281.jpg (3.37 MB, 3648x5472)
3.37 MB
3.37 MB JPG
>>4300722
How else would you do it, tuck your elbow in like some faggot?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 14.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:02 11:40:56
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating160
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4300723
I'm willing to bet it's on the lens (or in the mount)
>>
>>4300720
>Shutter timing is off. Time for a repair or CLA but honestly the body might not be worth the trouble.
Can't wait for global shutter to become affordable and less noisy so we don't have to deal with those antiquated moving parts.

File: IMG_1862.jpg (626 KB, 1284x1268)
626 KB
626 KB JPG
I don’t own an 85 yet, is 0.8f really worth 4times the price?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution216 dpi
Vertical Resolution216 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1284
Image Height1268
94 replies and 12 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Unless you are a professional, don't get the f1.2

I have the f2 and it's great. I don't even often use it because I really gravitate towards the f1.8 35mm and the newer f2.8 28mm
>>
>>4297531
>cannot pos r users think weather sealing is only for professionals
this is how olympus and pentax users got such big egos
>>
>>4296476

espio weather sealed 135 film compact seems good idea, too bulky though

k7 sooc jpeg is nice
>>
>>4296484
This camera will be a sought-after collectible in 19 years, trust me.
>>
File: N23_3316.jpg (792 KB, 2500x1663)
792 KB
792 KB JPG
>>4296301
f/1.2 is god tier

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 6
Camera SoftwareVer.03.50
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern1084
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:27 11:19:33
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/1.2
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6048
Image Height4024
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown

File: s-l1600.jpg (220 KB, 744x1036)
220 KB
220 KB JPG
I have $300 to spend on camera gear.
Talk me out of buying a Sony SLT and a small army of depreciated Maxxum lenses.
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4298560
>Comparing this choice with a Sony A77
Pros: full frame, magic lantern video shenanigans, metal body, weather sealed, fancy low light whatevers
Cons: the whole fucking camera is $300 in KEH bargain condition and none of those come with kit lenses all of which are considerably more expensive than a-mount, the whole suggestion is outside my budget

In other words I would if I could, but the budget here includes glass, not just the body.
>>
>>4298595
sorry, should've realized they went up. got a 10k shutter count 5D2 and a 50mm 1.8 myself in 2022 from ebay, $300 for both with a CF card
>>
>>4298513
SLT sucks dix and if it's IBIS is still working it'll stop soon. If you want to use Minolta glass buy an E-mount body and LA-EA2/4. That will be essentially an SLT but you'll be able do leave the retarded half-mirror at home when you don't need it.
>>
>>4298935
Those adapters are $200 on a good day, at that point I think I'd just buy an A700 for the Minolta glass I already have and spend the other $200 on an entirely separate camera.
>>
>>4298513
>300
Save it for a good cam body or a good lens if you already have a good camera
With a budget like that you might as well go for a point and shoot like the powershot g9, the lx5, rx100.
Or an old mirrorless alpha nex 3/5/6

File: street.jpg (55 KB, 890x930)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
You know the type, dishonest to the core. It pretends to be art and simultaneously to "tell it like it is". Usually shot anywhere from 28 to 58mm. Often black and white, often presented as "telling stories" even though there's no story at all. Most prominently presented as "street photography" even though it's not its only form.
You take the art of photography, hollow it out and fill thay soulless husk with nonsensical, neurotic justifications for it and are left with fraudulent pseudophotography.
20 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4300332
>bagholder opinions
discarded
>>
>>4300200
Many such cases, sad!
>>
>>4300256
>>4300258
And yet, such pose had to be "unposey" enough to fool the intended audience into thinking it was a lucky accident. That's street at its most fraudulent, faux casualty for "street cred". The final product is worse than both a normal staged shot and a lucky snapshot.
>>
File: 1000009503.jpg (99 KB, 1079x720)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>4300186
>>
>>4300187
Community Ass?

File: IMG_20240329_000852.jpg (2.2 MB, 4080x3072)
2.2 MB
2.2 MB JPG
I love to take pictures of this places and come here, they have beautiful aesthetics

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeXiaomi
Camera Model22120RN86G
Camera SoftwareMediaTek Camera Application
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Height3072
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:03:29 00:08:52
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width4080
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Height3072
Brightness0 EV
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time70009/1000000 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/1.8
Image Width4080
ISO Speed Rating6400
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Focal Length4.19 mm
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceOther
16 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DRF_9172.jpg (3.87 MB, 4723x3778)
3.87 MB
3.87 MB JPG
2/2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
All pictures ITT are underexposed
>>
>>4300112
>everything needs to be HDR with no pure black at all
>>
>>4299163
aesthetic af, makes you wanna look into the shadows to see what could be lurking
>>
>>4300112
Erm, well, actually a proper exposure is whatever you wanted it to be

File: fgt.jpg (587 KB, 960x960)
587 KB
587 KB JPG
Home Development Edition

Previous thread >>4296564

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process


Useful links

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
342 replies and 103 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4300858
Ofc, godspeed. I need to do the same with some of the markings on my om-1 actually.
>>
>>4300886
>om-1
Good taste, it's my favourite cam (and i had the stupid idea to sell it to buy an Om2, which i'm neutral toward)
What's your favorite lens to use on it ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4298557
Do you have no shame?
You unironically go out in public with that thing?
God what a faggot
>>
>>4300910
That guy's neck is going to thank him after some years
>>
File: 14263.jpg (1.28 MB, 3024x2005)
1.28 MB
1.28 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:03:11 13:11:10

File: gbtyjtj.png (91 KB, 281x184)
91 KB
91 KB PNG
Has anybody tried Evoto?
Its AI retouching software that can basically do skin editing for you?
It costs a bit but I am so sick of editing peoples skin.
Also anybody know any other good auto editing software for portraits? I am after a dodge and burn look with a few button clicks.

I dont even care if its not perfect, just something that will do a passable job.
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4300440
That example isn't a simple retouch, it flat out changed her skin tone and gave her lipstick. I hate editing skin too, but I thought the point was to just clean it up.
>>
>>4300497
>set camera color profile to portrait
>turn off RAW
>shoot jpg
>import into Photos on Apple device of your choice
>???
>Auto Enhance
>>
Why even do that? They fancy themselves white with a 56% face, or just need small imperfections removed?
>>
>>4300498
>letting your manufacturer decide the tonality
Cuck
>>
>>4300440
>Skin retouching
Who does this

Imagine shooting corporate portraiture or high end weddings lol that would ruin photography forever and stick you with an x100 and snapshitting building corners to grasp at a sense of normality. Just work at microsoft supervising h1bs at that point. Same amount of suffering, higher pay.

File: ADL19 - Copy.jpg (566 KB, 1145x1406)
566 KB
566 KB JPG
Everything Polaroid. Cameras, film, polaroid now.
Post your instant works.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1291
Image Height1592
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023:11:08 16:44:58
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1145
Image Height1406
200 replies and 113 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: shades.jpg (153 KB, 750x1000)
153 KB
153 KB JPG
Finally got around to buying a pack of film, looks like the 636 someone gave me a few years back still works fine (except the close-up lens is stuck, nothing of value lost there)
>>
>>4299527
It’s iso800 it’s more sensitive than any Polaroid, you sped
>>
File: 283507691005-0_2048x2048.jpg (180 KB, 1313x1600)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
>>4300168
Really? Any polaroid?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution0 dpi
Vertical Resolution0 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1313
Image Height1600
>>
>>4300276
Well if we’re posting old out of production expired shit then anything goes and there’s no point. Good luck getting 3000 out of that ancient stuff kek
>>
Does anybody here have any thing to say about the Instax EVO? I’ve considered getting it because it doubles as a photo printer and I can see the photo and change filters without wasting film.

File: unnamed.jpg (2.19 MB, 3448x4248)
2.19 MB
2.19 MB JPG
I have a Sony A7r ii with a stuck shutter and 30k clicks, should I buy a new camera or fix it? I'm on a budget and want a high resolution camera.
I do studio work portraits, weddings events and street photography with strobes.

any suggestions?
12 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4300429
Is this fuji color science
>>
>>4300429
your photo is so devoid of character and boring to look at compared to everything else in this thread
>>
>>4299734
colorful, fun to look around image and enjoy various colorful features, good depth, holds visual interest
really shows the joy of photography
>>4300429
bland colors, boring subject, looks like generic throwaway social media snap
>>
>>4300431
it's the chad filter, lol
open in new tab to see the real thing
>>
>>4300435
yeah it's not though it's actually a boring photo. i'm not talking about how colorful it is

File: 1710529652088582.jpg (80 KB, 1200x630)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
Thoughts on Colour accuracy?
matte vs glossy?
OLED vs Mini led vs LCD?
>>
>>4300272
macbook display it's not the best but that's what I have on me
>>
>>4300272
The one in my chinkpad

File: DSCF0004.jpg (1.11 MB, 1500x1200)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB JPG
Post pics taken with old digital cameras (2005 and older), im gonna post 3 i took today with my Fuji S2 Pro, i hate them because theyre cliché as fuck but hey theyre photos and i want an excuse to post em lmao

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePixS2Pro
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)118 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:28 22:45:46
Exposure Time1/90 sec
F-Numberf/4.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.8
Brightness5.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceShade
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length79.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height1200
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
81 replies and 53 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4291105
I feel like I know this place
>>
>>4294950
it's directly beside a few things, drop where you think if so. it'd give me a laugh if someone browsing here actually lived here.
>>
>>4280704
what a waste of money for real estate. I hope it was not taxpayers money.
>>
File: dt_CRW_2874.jpg (1.73 MB, 2708x2011)
1.73 MB
1.73 MB JPG
>>4296557
This is Amsterdam. The money (lots of it) was made with slavery.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 IS
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:03:20 12:57:14
Exposure Time1473/1000000 sec
F-Numberf/2.9
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating74
Lens Aperturef/2.9
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance65.54 m
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length7.70 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2708
Image Height2011
>>
File: rt_lssy-DSCF0006 (1).jpg (755 KB, 1200x1600)
755 KB
755 KB JPG
>>4258835

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix2600Zoom
Camera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix2600Zoom Ver3.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2001:01:01 03:40:38
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Shutter Speed1/79 sec
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Brightness5.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length6.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1600
Image Height1200
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationNormal
Flash ModeOff
Macro ModeOff
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeAuto
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK

I just saw down bellow, that there was an attempt, but thread derailed to the political bullshit because of terrible OP's views. I'll try to become a new OP and remember: no politics or you can eat a giant bag of dicks.

I admire East Block lenses in general and some of their cameras for years and a former photo gear collection fan (bulked everything and now think that your gear is a tool and if you don't shoot you don't need it). Ask me everything.

My current gear consist heavly with Jupiter series: Jupiters 8, 9, 21M and also Mir-1. Don't you ever buy a Jupiter-3 if you don't want to drown in soap.
83 replies and 31 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4298998

MIND YOUR BUSINESS FOR THE PARTY COMRADE
>>
>>4299006
shhhhhh, dw we both got secrets

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAndroid KB2003_13.1.0.582(EX01)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width489
Image Height955
Unique Image IDc8b159d8-e7db-4f9d-bff4-4d0c10b39202
>>
Might try to get one of these off taobao:
>minolta sr-mount
>removable viewfinder
>essentially a Minolta SR-2 with Nikon-F features gafted to it, mirror lock-up, split image viewfinder, 1/1000 cloth shutter
>comes with a biotar/helios clone of unknown quality

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>4299710
Get it solely for the fact that its brand new, if sr2's are still alive, this thing will outlast you.
>>
>>4299823
It is very much not new in box, the reason I would have to use taobao over AliExpress is because it's used goods.

File: 20240329_140409.jpg (3.68 MB, 4032x3024)
3.68 MB
3.68 MB JPG
Hi /p/haggots, my dad has a collection of vintage cameras. I own an a6000 with the kit lens and was looking for a cheap lens upgrade. Which of these old lenses are good? On the internet everyone is naming many different lenses for my camera which is not helpful. Which ones would you mount on the sony and for what photographic purposes? I'll post pics since it's nicer seeing them then just making a list.
20 replies and 14 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Get an EF the E mount adapter, then buy a bunch of cheap Pentax K, Nikon F, Olympus, etc. adapters to keep on the lenses. That way you don't have to keep switching out adapters. You could start off with one of each mount so you can try out all the lenses and see what you want to keep, say if there's 3 Pentax lenses you like using then buy another 2 K to EF adapters.
>>
>>4299387
I am messing with that particular zoom at the moment. Seems to be quite good for a standard 35-70 zoom. It was produced in quite low numbers and is a tiny bit faster than its successor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_olBKrdiSok
>>
Man liked his 135mm lenses, huh
>>4299355
This one is standard fov on aps-c format, nikon F to sony E adapter won't be too complex. Any 50mm lens like >>4299338 is also nice on a6000 but much tighter short telephoto fov
>>
>>4299390
imo would be better to keep separate adapters for vintage stuff directly to E mount
that way there is less play because there is only one adapter
and also, often times there's a preset ring for aperture control
>>
>>4299695
In my experience using F and K to EF mount adapter rings they have always been a really tight fit on the lens with no play, they're difficult to remove from the lens and aren't designed to be so on a regular basis. Any play in adapters have been at the body mount and the EF mount where they are designed to be constantly mounted and unmounted, and that's going to be the same whether it's EF at the end or K or F.

File: poezdka2014uztjkg_102.jpg (225 KB, 800x600)
225 KB
225 KB JPG
This is from infojd.ru. Sergei Bolashenko took down the site after Russian zoomers mocked him online for "racism" against Central Asians. Ironically, some of the most sincere photography of the former Soviet Union that I've ever seen. The guy was a train autist, and had a poorly-organized website with travelogues of him taking every Soviet line he could find still operational, and when not, he would hike along them for documentation purposes. Thousands of photos. These are some of the ones I've saved. Unfortunately, my Russian is less than rudimentary, so I haven't been able to glean much more.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Camera ModelKODAK EASYSHARE M1063 DIGITAL CAMERA
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution480 dpi
Vertical Resolution480 dpi
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/5.5
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating64
Lens Aperturef/5.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length5.70 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width800
Image Height600
Exposure Index64
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
19 replies and 12 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4289779
Hey thanks!
>>
bump photo threads
>>
bump photo threads
>>
>>4287261
I don't know why, but feels like a nice place
And yeah, I know I'm romanticizing and the place may be shit, but God knows it would be nice to have some mountains and less city to look at.
Thanks for posting OP. This is so far from where I live, it's nice to see something radically different.
>>
>>4287253
was this the guy who went to north korea by train


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.