Does anyone have advice regarding a card reader not reading a micro sd card?For more context, it was delivered by mail and seems like it may have been dropped (an ever so slight bump/rise to it)Local data recovery place is quoting anywhere from 800 to 2gs, which is simply out of the question due to a lack of funds.
>>4511949Flash memory is pretty resistant to physical damage as long as the chips themselves weren't cracked, and the electrical contacts of the card aren't completely sandblasted off. SD cards WILL (not might, WILL) fail anywhere between 6 months and 5 years into their used lifespan under normal circumstances, so if your card is cheap and shit you might be SoL.Seeing as you're talking about data recovery, I'm guessing this was something that had photos on it that you sent away? If I were you I'd spend the $10 on a new SD card reader to rule that out as the culprit as there are many out-of-spec and chingneseum readers that will just fail because the ambient sea level pressure rose 1.3 kPa.I've also had an amazon-tier card reader fail to read my beefier UHS-II spec cards despite the fact they're just supposed to fall back to the highest supported speed.Buy a new reader and report back OP.
>>4511965Thanks! Will do.
buy an ad.
Show me your shitty artsy bullshit, bring out your Holgas, bring out your LensBabys, bring out your bullshit where your focus is ass and your framing is tainted
>>4509754Truly tones you can't achieve on 35mm.
>>4510046Nice shot
Stomped on a fuzzy snap of lichen on a dead spruce until it stopped squirming.
Photo abusement thread, nice!
Please apply a dithering effect to one of your recent photos using this tool and post the result ITT if you don't mind: https://grainrad.com/
>>4499645Roger that. Was fun, I like this result. Original is in macro thread.
>>4499674Awesome result! >>4503325Neat, like old Indy DOS adventures
Failed to read instructions.
This thread is driving me nuts. I can't get the tool to work. Possibly a Linux issue.
I have some photos taken under tree shade with spots of light that I took with the intention of editing in the style of Monet's soft, cool shade-light contrast but I'm having a hard time nailing the post, any pointers?
post raws
>>4511640shoot raw and bracket with a tripod. thats it
2nd Tour
>>4511532that dude in the center background scares me. Looks like he has his hand behind his back like he's about to cap yo ass.Cool photos though. thanks for sharing. I hear Vietnam today is an expat paradise. they didn't carry the anger into the 21st century
Go /p/ro.>Want:• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread.>Do Not Want: • Go to >>>/wsr/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki - http://archive.today/15tYK
>>4510835The guy who fucking started this mutant deformed dog breed i hope he suffers in hell. The only gs that should be accepted should be working gsd, the ones that look like normal dogs not the ones with fucked up back legs.
>>4511142Spends tens of thousands £ on gear, still stars ave angel wings in the corners. Thanks for stopping me in searching for a better milky way lens
>>4511151Sorry I lied. I only took that pic a little over 2 years ago.>>4511256That was taken with a graflex xlsw with the old style 47mm super angulon and horseman 6x9 back. Super fun and simple camera that costs under a grand. The dust was free. :D
>>4511260>>4511168I was never complimenting the terrible practice photos you took of your mutt. The two egg photos you posted ITT are the only good photos you have ever posted here. Everything else has been pretty garbage, every bit as bad your husky owning alter ego’s landscapes.
>>4511271>schizo nophoto has shit taste in dogtography.Thank you for the compliments, angry lil guy. If you post some exceptional work, like I have, I would love to return the favor and give you some big props as well. :)
In April/May I went to China to my brother’s wedding and took a bunch of photos there. Since I’ve got a lot of photographs, I was thinking about getting some feedback as I’m trying to improve and got that feeling that I’m stuck. My photos doesn’t have a well defined style, so the compositions and color grade floats a lot.
>>4509819may I ask what do you use for shooting?
>>4511178I miss exif.
>>4509953>>4509828>>4509952These are really cool!
I'd try simplifying things and exclude more
>>4510294>>4510480>>4511223Thanks! I’m glad that you liked >>4511178Sure, I’m using the Canon R8, most of my photos were with the RF 100mm f2.8 and the RF 70-200 f4. For the wide angles, I’ve used the RF 16mm. >>4511241It came out pretty nice also, it gave the dog more emphasis.
night scenes editionprevious >>4501719
>>4504432Subtle Tung Tung Tung Sahur. Very nice
>>4503437really nicepreserved the highlights,neat framingnatural perspective“vibes”
>>4503527interestingsomewhat abstractvery moody
>>4503528a truly ugly branchstraighten the horizon at least
>>4503536too much light>>4504999not badsly, cheeky, aloofa lot comes from posture
New to 4 Chan my name is Olivia
just b urself olivia there's no rules except post photos, talk about photos, and don't talk about not photos.
>>4510489bro why is there spaghetti all over the place here
Hi Olivia,Welcome, you will probably come across some very bitter and mean people here and realise 4chan isn't the place for you.However, if you are determined to stay, stick to the /RPT/ (recent photo) threads, or other threads specifically about photos. Most of the most active threads on this board are unfortunately about buying camera gear or having arguements.Good luck
>>4510464>tldr: just shoot photosWhen you take a photo, try to have a clear subject in mind, or at the very least intresting elements. When you take a photo, what looks good to you in person will not always translate to an image as it has to flatten and compress it, and you lose a lot of the small details as a result. I'd reccomend going through the threads and looking through them, avoiding the arguments and gear talk and focusing on the pics themselves. Find ones you think look nice and interesting, and think about what you like about them. Lastly, the most important advice of them all, go out, take photos, and just have fun
Thanks for the advice
Why are they so bad at taking photos?
>>>/pol/535690276cANON confirmed P*lish, he posted the same picture in the OP here before
>>4510978>only one person knows about RogozinFaith in the phony "landings" is at an all time low
only a true betamale shaves
>>4511033As the American empire collapses I am sure they will admit it on an official level as well, ensuring that any semblance of national pride is eradicated.
>>4511035a true gentleman, you mean
Predator and Prey Edition?>Previous Thread Image Limit Reached >>4494783
How do i into bird/reptile/aquatics ?Like what’s a good starter kit
>>4507097Sony, big expensive lens, and then start an insta account and take bokeh shots of the same animals in your immediate area over and over and make sure to get that good shot of you holding the big lens.
>>4501111>using the old fim camera inherited from grandpaeven though the picture is nothing special I'd still say it's based, good for you
>>4504546>>4504552the naturalistic colors were way better. why are you (y'all?) saturating your shots to high heaven?>>4504554>I just push the saturation and brillance sliders in Anseldo that less
>>4503692>I can't do that, it would be too fakewhat did he mean by this?
Photos taken by the Soldiers who were there.
>>4508294>best thread on 4chan atm seconded. that mortar at night photo is gonna become by lock screen me thinks.
>>4510847Maybe I should make a second ??
new thread here>>4510927>>4510927>>4510927
Picasa was a treasure trove of Korea and Vietnam war photos from random vets. I saved a lot of them and have them on a drive somewhere.
>>4511007serve them up please:)here >>4510931
I think it's neat. Finally not a re-release of something or gimped to make room for something new.
>>4510537The x100 does not have a FF lens, retard.
>>4510820Yet why would you get one over an even cheaper RX1RII besides slightly better battery life and quicker to use EVF? The lens was already underspecced for the 42MP sensor, so no reason to even bother with 61MP. At least the II had something neat with the variable optical low pass filter which was gone on the III, and it still had a tilt screen.
>>4510828Mark II Sony bodies were an unusable janky mess>>4510820I would gladly get a firesale RX1rIII for $2k
Fix the dust issue, put in a newer sensor, and boom: lx100iii.
>>4508975I like it except the motorized zoom. Slow and long-term the mechanisms are a lot less reliable.
