[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


New anti-spam measures have been applied to all boards.

Please see the Frequently Asked Questions page for details.

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: G249980C.jpg (226 KB, 1000x1000)
226 KB
226 KB JPG
So I'm a fucking idiot and ordered used Sigma MC-11 converter online for my Sony a7riii camera for EF lenses from my older system, but had no idea it comes in two variations under the same name - for Canon EF and Sigma SA lenses.
Of course I recieved a wrong one - for SA mount lenses, and can't refund it.

I already bought the EF one too, so my question is:

Are there any good and cheap Sigma SA lenses that are worth keeping the converter for them, or I shouldn't bother and just try and resell it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1000
Image Height1000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2020:02:18 09:43:33
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height1000
7 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4372887
>>4372885
Most Sigma lenses from back then are simpy not good. Terrible even. I'd ditch it desu, if you wanted an esoteric mount I would have gone with the Minolta A adapter, some excellent sleepers that don't cost too much if you find them in Japan. EF - should be common knowledge what is and isn't good
>>
>>4372885
Sigma SA lenses are usually more expensive than the same lenses on Canon EF. Maybe you can find a good deal or two on the Art lenses, but I would say just resell it.
>>
>>4372885
>>4372926
No!
Leave SA mount optics for those of us forced to use it (Foveon).
It's hard enough trying to find something decent to stick on them.
About 75% of SA lenses on the market are SHIT.
>t. just bought a 20mm f/1.8 without doing research, thinking Sigma didn't fuck up their pre-global vision primes too
>they did
I hope the 1.7x crop obviates most of the problem, but it's still one of the worst "EX" primes they made.
>>
File: ptard.jpg (700 KB, 1000x1233)
700 KB
700 KB JPG
>>4375490
>>
>>4375576
Saved.

File: 1C9A0036.jpg (427 KB, 667x1000)
427 KB
427 KB JPG
Cleaning out my folders and migrating them to a NAS, thought I might as well post some here.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:19 18:17:00
Exposure Time1/8000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
28 replies and 28 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1C9A6477.jpg (4.76 MB, 3918x2612)
4.76 MB
4.76 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:02 21:22:02
Exposure Time1/8000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating2000
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: 1C9A6850.jpg (4.55 MB, 3146x3146)
4.55 MB
4.55 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:02 21:22:22
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1250
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length200.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>667x1000
Are you kidding me
>>
File: 1C9A6811.jpg (365 KB, 1000x667)
365 KB
365 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:19 18:17:19
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1250
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length200.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: 1C9A0297.jpg (552 KB, 1000x1000)
552 KB
552 KB JPG
>>4375597
Eh, I stuck to the standards of more than 5 years ago. Bit of a habit I guess.

Here's a 1000x1000 one for ya.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:19 18:17:05
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: fuji.jpg (436 KB, 1651x1651)
436 KB
436 KB JPG
This is the Film General Thread, aka the /fgt/.
Please post film photos in this thread.
It's ok to ask about film gear in this thread.
>it's not gay to post in the /fgt/, unless you haven't cottoned on yet that every single post on this board claiming that x film has y resolution is bait you can just ignore

old thread >>>4367820

Thread Question:
>does the /fgt/ serve a purpose now that /p/ is a film board?
I would argue it's still relevant to sequester our images from the digislug /rpt/
327 replies and 125 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375709
Good luck, and enjoy it if you win! I have like 3 of those cameras lol...

I posted it for someone who may be considering getting into sheet film. It is a truly fantastic view camera, and this could be an insane deal with the 4 lenses.

The sinar P is much heavier than the F2, but you get really great movement precision, and it has a box that fits everything, lenses included!
>>
>>4375709
Oh yeah, and if you wanted to get into 8x10 the P has a removal rear standard carrier, so you can just swap out the 4x5 carrier for an 8x10 one.
A good deal on an 8x10 rear standard carrier + 8x10 GG/film holder + 8x10 bellows is like 600-800 USD. About the cost of your bottom of the barrel wooden 8x10 cameras. Keep an eye on ebay and they pop up every couple months.
>>
>>4375711
>>4375716
Jk, I don't have enough money to burn for 8x10 u.u. I was thinking of getting one just to shoot those huge fucking Polaroid sheets, but I think an Intrepid would be fine for that type of thing.
>>
>>4375721
:[ Those lenses would probably only work okay with 8x10 anyways. Polaroid + intrepid sounds like a fun combo. Maybe even the most fun/least autistic view camera combo possible.
>>
NEW THREAD
>>4375751
>>4375751
>>4375751
>>4375751

File: scan0125.jpg (851 KB, 1398x2048)
851 KB
851 KB JPG
I shot a roll of Kodak XX black and white film,
looking for any feedback.

(I know some of them the horizon wasn't perfectly straight but ill fix that next time)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1398
Image Height2048
20 replies and 20 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: scan0126.jpg (837 KB, 1395x2048)
837 KB
837 KB JPG
>>4375377

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1395
Image Height2048
>>
File: scan0156.jpg (773 KB, 2048x1378)
773 KB
773 KB JPG
>>4375377

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2048
Image Height1378
>>
File: scan0134.jpg (763 KB, 2048x1384)
763 KB
763 KB JPG
and that's it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2048
Image Height1384
>>
thanks for sharing your pics anon
i think most of your pics are somewhat boring
exposure and contrast is good, but the subject is nothing i really care about
there are a few i like though
this >>4375394
this >>4375379
and maybe this >>4375397
>>
>>4375483
pretty much this
aesthetically nice pics but just not very interesting

File: DSC_0389_02.jpg (3.11 MB, 3904x2324)
3.11 MB
3.11 MB JPG
Aviation Pics General (aka I work at the airport and I get to share the cool stuff I see everyday :) )

Starting with this Delta A321 (this angle was short final, right before landing)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 50
Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.7 W
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern1103
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:08:26 20:36:47
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating360
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3904
Image Height2324
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
160 replies and 141 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSC_1253_DxO.jpg (1.41 MB, 4883x3263)
1.41 MB
1.41 MB JPG
>>4375432
front wheel comes up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 50
Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)180 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:16 06:19:34
Exposure Time1/640 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance19.95 m
Metering ModeOther
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length120.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4883
Image Height3263
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Image QualityFINE
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeAF-C
Flash SettingNORMAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations1656
>>
File: DSC_1256_DxO.jpg (1.13 MB, 4750x3167)
1.13 MB
1.13 MB JPG
>>4375433
and its gone

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 50
Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)277 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:16 06:24:08
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance19.95 m
Metering ModeOther
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length185.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4750
Image Height3167
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Image QualityFINE
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeAF-C
Flash SettingNORMAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations1659
>>
File: DSC_1261_DXO2.jpg (3.29 MB, 5568x3712)
3.29 MB
3.29 MB JPG
>>4375434
dxo photolab does a good job saving pics i thought were unsavable, but deepprime xd2 (10 mins to process a image usually lol) makes stuff *too* smooth sometimes. if it doesnt look good with regular prime its probably not worth editing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 50
Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)277 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:17 09:59:25
Exposure Time1/640 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating4000
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance19.95 m
Metering ModeOther
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length185.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5568
Image Height3712
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Image QualityFINE
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeAF-A
Flash SettingNORMAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations1664
>>
File: DSC_1262_DXO2_1.jpg (1 MB, 5162x3440)
1 MB
1 MB JPG
>>4375435
same plane on the ground, this camera really hates low light so im happy

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 50
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)157 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating1000
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
White BalanceAuto
>>
File: DSC_1265_DXO2.jpg (3.15 MB, 4876x3265)
3.15 MB
3.15 MB JPG
>>4375436
last pic before it hits the bump limit. im gonna try lightroom next, theres a deal where you can get 1yr of lightroom + ps + 1tb cloud storage for $95 from best buy if you buy this photo paper and combine it

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/hp-sprocket-2-x-3-premium-sticky-backed-zink-photo-paper-20-pack/5789606.p?skuId=5789606

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 50
Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 8.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern63192
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)375 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:17 11:06:01
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating9000
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance19.95 m
Metering ModeOther
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length250.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4876
Image Height3265
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Image QualityFINE
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeMANUAL
Flash SettingNORMAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range50.0 - 250.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/6.3
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations1668

File: IMG_20241004_153646_702.jpg (4.61 MB, 3000x2259)
4.61 MB
4.61 MB JPG
They're finally shipping them.
Got mine today so let's get a thread set up.
>It's around twice the volume, but significantly lighter than the original
>Strap lug is different now
>The viewfinder is a lot smaller, and doesn't have parallax lines
>No exposure info at all in the viewfinder, lights are for focus and flash only
>Have to look at the display for everything
>Shutter speed doesn't show on the display when it's on Auto
>Frames aren't shown unless you trip the shutter (it says AUTO instead)
>It can read DX coating and sets ISO automatically
>Fit and finish are solid, nothing loose, built quality is as nice as the original
>Everything on the top plate is engraved
>I found the cover to be hard to put back on after loading a roll
>Autofocus is noticeably loud, much louder than my Konica Hexar
>Advance is a lot more stiff than the original

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
74 replies and 22 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4371947
This.
There have been some truly terrible cameras put out using the Rollei moniker.
Although ironically this one looks like this one has a better viewfinder than the 35AF. v
>>
PetaPixel reviewed the camera and mentioned a lot of the problems OP was having, but it's a pretty soft critique of the camera overall.

https://petapixel.com/2024/10/12/mint-rollei-35af-review-style-over-substance/

>I had some issues with the top LCD panel showing erroneous markings; it would show my metering as +2 stops overexposed when in auto mode... I contacted Mint and the company assured me that some of these bugs are known and that everything will be rectified in future production cameras or gradually as they arise under warranty.
lol
>>
My hopes for a good mkii version have kinda been dashed after seeing the nature of Mint's responses.
Nice you got a refund, but I'm sad the camera needs so much revision. But I'm skeptical about revisions anyway now given their responses.
Damn, I really liked it on paper though.
>>
>>4373275
They never updated their Instantkon cameras even though sone of us sent feedback about a multitude of issues.
They're grifters. Petapixel should of not even given time to review their mediocre products.
>>
File: 22-HEX-230.jpg (3.51 MB, 3181x1909)
3.51 MB
3.51 MB JPG
>>4369271
Well, the camera is out of my hands.
Mint posted the refund as soon as I sent them tracking confirmation, which was nice of them.
With that ends one of the weirdest and most disappointing experiences I've ever had in tech or photography. I'm still confounded.

The product felt rushed, even though it's been in development since at least 2017. It's made of solid metal, yet the controls (including the transport and shutter itself) feel stiff, plasticy and cheap. The camera is supposedly designed 'by photographers, for photographers', but some design choices feel as if it was made by someone who has never shot a P&S film camera before.

To bring this sort of inadequate product to market fully knowing of its defects, and not supporting their very expensive products which are already on market a la >>4373447 tells me that there's quite a discrepancy between the company's image ("we're just like you! we put loving care into our products!") and who they actually are ("we don't give a shit about quality or design, have fun with your overpriced 3rd rate camera.").

In the meantime, I've never been more grateful or appreciative of my ancient, trusty Hexar. That camera has some major quirks and the lens isn't very good (despite what is said about it), but it's fast, quiet, well-made, has a great viewfinder, and is le "one you have with you".

I'll still be lurking the thread in case anyone gets their preorder. I'm curious to see whether others have the same issues.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationBottom, Right-Hand

File: 1721697639201156.jpg (69 KB, 941x898)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
Anyone else get weird vibes from 24mp cameras? The number 24 is so awkward and uncomfortable. I don't like it. 16mp is wholesome and good. 30 is also really nice. But I hate cameras with 20-something megapixels. Why is it like this?
21 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375285
Prove it.
>>
>>4375331
He is an instagram user and thinks that it will get him somewhere and that what phone viewers think matters
>lol
Hes probably one of those fucktards who thinks shooting models is the only way anyone could get laid too
>>
>>4375339
Damn that's wild. What percentage would you give it that he posta photo?
>>
>>4375284
>4000x4000 is divine
Hard agree. Great res to crop to or just shoot in 1:1 on a 3:2 camera.
>>
>>4375284
What about using the golden ratio as a crop factor?

File: intro3-001.jpg (69 KB, 520x508)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
Can someone give me a QRD on the differences between the d700, d800, and d750. While the 700 & 800 are pretty close in price, the 750 is about $200 more. Is there any reason to pay the premium for the 750?

Also I don't care about the megapixel difference. I'm just looking for a digital body counterpart to share lenses with my f100
103 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4361597
>is so lowres it's a toy.
This is such a retarded thing to say I would actually piss on your camera given the chance.
>>
>>4361591
Man the D700 was godly when it came out. Not enough to make me ditch my 5D for it but godly nonetheless
>>
>>4375026
It's still godly. Everything I shoot with it looks good.
>>
>>4375057
^this. 12 is plenty especially today with good up sampling.
>>
>nikon user
>rockwell-esque factually incorrect gear opinions only the blind could hold
12mp looks awesome at 2mp but even at 8mp it makes you wish film was more alive.

File: image.png (2.82 MB, 1745x1332)
2.82 MB
2.82 MB PNG
soulless snapping at F/32 edition
273 replies and 148 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Spider.jpg (2.49 MB, 4608x3072)
2.49 MB
2.49 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:05:15 22:39:23
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4608
Image Height3072
>>
File: img-02902.jpg (1.5 MB, 2120x1414)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB JPG
>>4370450
Thanks for the feedback brah! I'll probably order a flash tomorrow. Been enjoying snapping all over my backyard looking for critters. Definitely feeling autistic tho

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM3
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:11 23:59:56
Exposure Time1/250 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating500
Brightness0.5 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
bump so this wont die. ill post pics l8er tonight
>>
>>4374523
Image limit reached, start the next one friend. I don't have a fresh macro shot that's worthy as the thread photo
>>
>>4370630
>>4370626
>>4370548
>>4370473
>>4370450
>>4370301
>>4370193
>>4370169
No, the anon who called me out on the shitty edit is correct. I don't know what I was thinking but the original is better. Gotta learn proper editing...

File: images.jpg (9 KB, 270x186)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
What kind of lens do I need for porn?

My friends wants to do some nudes/softcore photos and I'm concerned my 24-70mm f/2.8 wont be wide enough given the small size of the space we'll be shooting in.

I'm currently torn between something like a 16-24 zoom at either f/2.8 or f/4 and using a tripod to give me the most compositional flexibility, but I could also go something like a 20mm f/1.8 and get those extra couple stops of light. The lighting situation is going to be tough, I plan on bringing a flash, a small static light and reflector, but due to space limitations I can't really get some strobes or anything in there.

What is my best bet? Any suggestions? I can find a specific lens later, I just want general direction.
11 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4374461
Shoot it all with a fucking 80. Post 1979 porn looks like shit bc they cheaped out in the video era and just used built-in camcorder lenses, followed by several shit years of shit and shitty shit in the late 90s through 2005, when the fucktards just went “oi I got it, I’ll stick an ultra wide on it and shove the cam up everyone’s crotch & still get some of their spaghetti’d out body out at the edges so you can see it’s not just a 40min shot of disembodied genitals smashing, and we’ll light everything to death so you can see every fucking gob of mascara and disgusting vaginal and anal secretions getting mashed into a paste while our round pumping dipshit here spits in her mouth and slaps our bored & disgusted model for ten minutes. Porn is fucking garbage. Adult films were good. Look at adult films from Russ Meyer & Joe Sarno to see people who actually gave a shit about what they were filming. But that shit almost completely ends by 1980, with a few exceptions that made art into the mid-eighties. After that the women’s fashion was thoroughly fucked anyway, & now it’s just a sewer pipe of commodified trash very little of which anyone even sees. Everything beautiful goes to shit eventually. We all missed the window on this one. I explored marketability & funding to produce some quality content and sure as shit, fir as big as the porn business is, the market won’t support quality, they just want endless quantity. So that is what we get.
>>
>>4374604
If I had the working distance I would. But I think you're right. Porn now looks like shit. There was definitely a shift once digital became viable.
>>
>>4374461
18-35 f 1.8 because you don't need a faster lens in a studio, make sure to use dslr and 4-5 lights.
>>
What level of beta cuckery is this
>>
>>4374625
the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8? that's a crop lens.
If op has a 24-70 and bought either a tokina or sigma 16-28 it leads me to believe he is shooting full frame.

Ok so this time we are going to make a lil jump in time and take a look at Richard Avedon and his work.

Richard Avedon (1923–2004) was one of the most influential American fashion and portrait photographers of the 20th century. Born in New York City, Avedon started his photography career in the U.S. Merchant Marine, taking identification photos, but quickly moved into fashion photography after the war. He began working for Harper’s Bazaar in the 1940s and later for Vogue, where he became known for breaking away from traditional static fashion shoots. Avedon’s images were dynamic, full of movement, and completely revolutionized how fashion was captured. But his work extended far beyond fashion—he had a deep interest in portraiture and used his camera to reveal the personality and soul of his subjects.
25 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4369598
jews literally have a religious obligation to help other jews succeed whether or not they deserve it. if they do not devote xx% of their wealth to this yahweh gets mad(der) at them.

it is the jews. the jews themselves will tell you this. why wont you copy them?
>>
>>4369602
>my photos are bad because I'm not jewish
>>
>>4369013
Good thread op. Link to the previous?
>>
>>4369013
Nice thread
>>
>>4369027
Thank you OP. Based and informative.

File: 6659312913_359e7cbcd2_b.jpg (168 KB, 1023x915)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
Its a Century Graphic a good camera for street photography?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
12 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4368832
You’re probably right, but I think in terms of the functionality and the way you had to shoot with these cameras, whether 2 x 3 or 4 x 5 would be pretty much the same. The extra fun bit, was that press guys like that also had to field develop a lot of the time on the go, which is just extra based if you ask me
>>
>>4367619
That fukkin image lol
>>4368942
"Sir, what are you doing?"
"Mixing painkillers and drain-o"
"Why, sir?"
"To develop art!"
"This is a Wendy's, sir."
>>
>>4369535
Based beyond belief if you ask me
>>
File: 1728218762917.jpg (189 KB, 1280x720)
189 KB
189 KB JPG
>>4367215
rangefinders use a mirror, so it's not mirrorless.
>>
>>4367215
FLAWLESS VICTORY

File: 1669966200308.jpg (894 KB, 2400x2400)
894 KB
894 KB JPG
Capture one is the single worst raw processor.

The generic and prostandard profiles look like overly vibrant iPhone shit and it doesn't have lens correction profiles for a shitton of lenses. The file management is also straight out of linux. Folder trees? And where cloud? This is a program for old men. Tags and cloud storage, now.
NO HASSELBLAD SUPPORT EITHER! They're not even phase one anymore, why enmity? Lightroom supports hasselblad fucking fine.

I am going back to lightroom. Fuck crapture one /p/ shills. Your raw processor is fucking garbage and no it is not industry standard. Lightroom is. That's for a reason. Deal with it. The only reason you recommend this garbage is because you all use SNOYS, OLYMPISS, PENISONIC, FUJIFAILS, and CANNOT POS RF MIRRORLESSs with bad color science and you think the vibrant iphone shit profiles crapture one has hide it. Have you ever thought that if you got a leica, panasonic, canon DSLR, nikon, etc you would have good color science in a program that doesnt suck and even *gasp* jpeg?

Lightroom > RawTherapee > Jpeg > Darktable > MS Paint >>>>>> Crapture One
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
This thread is a good example of why /p/ sucks now. Why should I even engage with this topic seriously? It's not like anyone will learn something from you, nor would it unfuck your debilitating autism.
>>
Works perfectly on my machine and my A7III files.
Unironically skill issue.
>>
reminder to use free as in freedom software when possible
>>
>>4374554
>he has to use presets and profiles
lmfaoo damn son
>>
>>4374554
Bridge+ACR >>>>> POWER GAP >>>>>>> Lightroom.

File: Viltrox Warning.jpg (226 KB, 800x960)
226 KB
226 KB JPG
>f/4.5
>fixed aperture
>no manual focus
>can't be used with electronic first curtain shutter enabled
>built in lens cap slider must always be opened before switching the camera on otherwise it will burn out the lens AF motor
Sonybros... why are we always the beta testers for snoy consoomer products that break so easily...
38 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: JHH02813.jpg (1.78 MB, 1826x2738)
1.78 MB
1.78 MB JPG
It's so fucking ass, to be honest, regretting purchasing it a bit, if you could change the aperture from f4.5-16, you could leave it in manual mode and just shoot and let auto ISO do it's thing, but f4.5 is thin enough where missing focus is pretty noticeable

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:17 13:51:35
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness7.6 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: JHH02804.jpg (653 KB, 1826x2738)
653 KB
653 KB JPG
I tried shooting from the waist just aiming the camera at the general direction I wanted the pic taken, and because the AF is so ass, it was either blurry, or didn't shoot because it was trying to focus.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:17 14:08:38
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness10.5 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: JHH02793.jpg (1.59 MB, 1826x2738)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB JPG
>>4374882
That's just general loss of contrast fyi, not me lifting blacks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:17 13:51:28
Exposure Time1/1250 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness9.7 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: JHH02766.jpg (1.45 MB, 1826x2738)
1.45 MB
1.45 MB JPG
Heavy crop, sharpness is fine, the form factor is great, but the non-variable aperture thing is so ass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:10:17 13:51:15
Exposure Time1/1250 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness10.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4374879
>>4374881
>>4374882
>>4374884
>>4374886

Sovl, I like they are not razor sharp and clinical looking

File: Fujifilm X-M5.jpg (106 KB, 1300x750)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>saves the entry level market
Fuji won.
79 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1713225244587562.png (507 KB, 679x517)
507 KB
507 KB PNG
this or an a6400? they are the same price
>>
>>4374600
Which one has more dials (do you need them )and which one has a viewfinder (do you want it), which one has more lens options on the useed market for cheaper
>>
>>4374509
That's because Fuji came into the market to milk hipsters who thought £250 DSLRs were bad because of their price
>>
>>4374058
Never been the case, at least for USD pricing on new models. Entry level has been $500-800 for the last twenty years. D40 launched at $600, D60 at $750, T3 at $600, T2i at $900, etc. The lowest you'd ever see new, is $400 for a few weeks a year on an older Rebel, or like $450-550 for a two lens kit.
If you consider inflation, an entry level price of $800 today would be a similar equivalent of $500-600 10-20 years ago.
>>
>>4374809
It will be for a very casual edc camera (90% photos 10% video), honestly think I could get away without an evf because the video on the fuji looks a lot better


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.