What am I in for lads?
autism, repeating the same test shots 5-8 times, and fucking around in different processing software to get 'accurate' colors that only matter if you're doing prints with a reputable business.
>>4307785these are transparencies for scanning calibration anon
>>4307917Does that make any functional difference?Captcha: THOT
>>4307924If you're going to be printing your pictures it does make a difference. Using a spider or other monitor/scanner calibration will sometimes make your stuff look quite different.
>>4307925Alright, fair point. Here's your answer, OP.
Anyone used a Nikon F55? It was one of their last film SLR’s. I’m used to using an old D80 DSLR and want to start shooting on film. The F55 looks similar enough to the D80 that it shouldn’t be too hard to get used to[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width500Image Height332Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306801Hijacking this to ask if there's any point in shelling out $600-$900 for a FM3A instead of an older FM/FM2 or even something like an F2. I'm looking for a manual, mechanical f-mount and don't really care if it's AI or not as long as it's reliable.
>>4307336Your post made me curious so I checked my local listings, and holy Jesus, why are these still this expensive? I don’t such a price is justifiable for a film slr no matter how nice or top of the line it may have been, that’s mad.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1284Image Height1720
>>4307348Lenses are worth about 250
>>4305683> If you already have glass for it and don't mind occasionally buying batteries / getting rechargeables AND it cost you less than $20 w/ the kit lens then... maybe go for it?This. I bought one in mint condition with a kit lens a few years ago for $15-20, it's nothing special, this was a low-end camera to my knowledge even back then, but it has a nice big viewfinder, 3 af points, a dateback (which I haven't tried), and it just works exactly like I would expect. This was my first (properly working) film camera. Don't hesitate to go for something more interesting tho.
>>4307348That's cheap, I'd actually go and buy that right now if I was local.
Dear god, even Gerald is Dunking on Fuji onions. Why don't these people realize that they aren't 'misunderstood', they are just unlikable pretentious cunts on a budget since they'd all desperately like to shoot Lecia instead.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ngqu_qZSLV8&t=450s
>>4294355>see work taken with a Fuji that looks great>see “work” taken with a Fuji that looks like ass>get a snoy instead
>>4299772The 40 isn't f1.4
Apparently this camera has the AF speed of an olympus epl-1 and makes a whirr noise so you cant shoot video without an external mic. Near-$2k camera and they call actual good ones “fool frame” because they dont look girly and fit in purses… cant even shoot video with autofocus. Techs behind a $500 canon dslr. >>4304902Fujislugs hate wedding photography because its essentially creepy street snapping with a paycheck (and their mortal enemy, quality standards)
>>4307749The X100s, like most faux-retro shit, have always been scameras that only have real appeal to professional photographers that already have 50 wunderboxes and are developing PTSD and antisocial tendencies after dealing with too many clients. The more conscious they are of gear, the more they like it. If they are very anti-gear as a spiritual/moral principle they will have no interest in fuji, or leica, etc and just put a pancake lens on their usual camera when going out to f/8 and be there.This is not a camera a normal person who is also a photographer would love. This is a camera only an experienced photographer with issues would love.
Fuji is missing out on massive profits from bringing back and selling film stocks. If they released a simple film version of this camera and priced it below 500$ it would sell like peanuts, and just like their instax cameras the money would come from the film sales.
Redkon editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY -https://textbin.net/evqhpcl2jy>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4273759Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4307808Yeah just as the sun went down
Bump limit reached, new thread>>4307820>>4307820
>>4307802looks like old skate/bmx videos
>>4295124something with infinite focus, soft reflective lightingjust some thoughts. probably more
>>4296299bro this is sick, come up to joilet sometime for some more hxc shows
I photograph stuff, I'll post some stuff, first photos that I like, then portraits and other stuff.
>>4302876The boys looking hard AF
>>4302848nice
>>4304220What's your @?
>>4302842I adore the depth in this one. Will you drop the exif for it? Praying you're still checking the thread Romanianbro
Very nice photos...i really like the framed ones and the silhouette ones.Id love to post some of mines too!
I was browsing flickr today and came across this photo taken with a Canon Powershot G9.How was this effect achieved?
>>4307705[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width349Image Height642Scene Capture TypeStandard
You are all wrong, this effect is coming from a very slow shutter speed, look how blurred the horses feet are, a classic sign of slow shutter speed.
>>4307725Horse feet move when they're running, buildings don't move. Notice how blurred the building in the background is?
>>4307726>buildings don't movesource??
>>4307714mong isn't a name of any ethnicity, that would be mongol instead you fucking mongoloid
continued from >>4293925i won't bother to ask for any sort of feedback this time. in fact, please refrain from responding at all. now i'm just posting for the sake of adding photos to the board. if you think they suck, then make a new thread and post better photos.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:12:13 21:35:12Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness3.0 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)84 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:22 23:13:21Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness0.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length56.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height3000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Focal Length (35mm Equiv)84 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:23 01:15:01Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.5Brightness-2.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length56.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX Optio SCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:31 01:10:17Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1600Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain DownContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX Optio SCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:31 01:24:09Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height1600RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain DownContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
From my collection.Post em if you're a connoisseur.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4306787Anything can be art though, can't it?Gotta back up "ugly" results with some kind of idea though[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro3Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-Pro3 Ver1.31Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:19 19:18:43Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating6400Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-0.3 EVExposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length33.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6240Image Height4160RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessUnknownWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationUnknownFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 1200DCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)PhotographerjjgdMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.4Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:15 00:50:48Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length47.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306787>offensive to the ideals of art
>>4301983these are epic, man. love the fishbowl effect across all the images as a series. you've got to make a book!
>>4301988this is the best one. the curved fishbowl wraparound, the girl in red being the focus. keep making these until you've got a collection of 100, and make a book
Alright, now is the time to buy. Apparently hollywood is using soviet photo glass for movies now. Companies are rehousing them into film lenses. Dune 2 was shot entirely on old Soviet glass. I know the Helios m42 is legend. what else should I look at. I am on L mount.
>>4306238It has detail. The individual hairs are there. Just not as contrasty. Too sharp of a lens and it looks like a 3d render or AI enhanced. Why do you think mirrorless portraits shot with flawless lenses like the nikon noct and plena look uncanny before retouching? Human vision isnt nearly that sharp. If nikon had a 100mp camera you could crop super sharp 5mp images out of it, the sharpest 5mp has ever been, with the plena attached. It’s actually too much.
>>4305872>Correct, now is the time to buy at inflated prices due to all the youtubers hyping them up. The real time to buy was years agothese lenses are like $60 with free shipping faggot. have fun when they are $200 in a couple years.
>>4307249i'm the anon that is in armenia, they're about $20 WITH the zenit cameras here, it's cheap as fuck
>>4304170Here is the list of most common ones with description and testshttps://radojuva.com/en/photo-review/#russian
>>4304170>soviet glass to L mount10/10 op thank you
So basically i have been shooting film for fun as a hobby with my point and shoots and slr's, but i have always wanted to switch to digital. I have been collecting/using my lens and i now have some pentax k lenses and an m42 lens. I really want to try to adapt them to an old digital slr , but im just not sure what old ccd sensor dslr i should get. My budget is under £60 for a cam body (i know, tight) and like £15 max for an pentax k adapter, any suggestions for what i should buy? I was thinking cannon, like a 350d or 40d . Maybe a nikon but i heard they are bad at adapting vintage lenses for some reason? At the end of the day im looking for something that will adapt my pk lenses well, and let me shoot when im going out somewhere or on holiday. I dont mind if it has a cf card but if theres an sd card that would be way better. Oh, and for anyone who suggests micro 4/3's , thanks but i want to keep my focal lengths intact. I assume all dslr's will have the same manual focusing systems from the time but if you could recommed an dslr with split prism focusing (if they even have that?) That would be like a godsend. I plan to do more zone focusing but only one of my lens' has the markings and im still tryna improve on quickly focussing. Oh, also if you guys could give me help on decent adapters because im worried i will buy something cheap that will strip or not focus properly.Sorry if what i wrote is indespiherable , but if it is, i really would apprecuate any help.
Just get a Pentax DSLR. Or a Nikon Z6 and adapter.
>>4307602>60 funny monies>I will like to keep my focal lengthlook m8, you can get a Pentax K10d for that much and even then its APS-C, good news no need for a PK adapter since it will work just fine, and the m42 lenses will just need an adapter that is less than 10 bucks.
under 600 you say?canon 5diii
Just save up an extra £300 and get an A7, if you can't manage that then you're incredibly poor and should pick a different hobby. It will be so much better than a 40D (I own both), field of view with your lenses will be the same as you're used to with film and an EVF with focus peaking is so much better than using a crop body viewfinder with a split prism (an aftermarket focus screen will probably cost you half your budget for the body).
>>4307602Get rid of all your Pentax lenses for Nikon lenses and get a DF for a proper SLR feel.
Previously on /gear/ >>4299018
Do they make cages for 600D/t3i?Specifically I want the threaded holes on the side.would other canon cages fit? I'm fine with chinesium
>>4306338>Covering face to hide identity>Coofid cuck muzzle around neck
>>4310443You can get universal L brackets with a bunch of threaded holes on the vertical part
is the nikon 50/1.4g worth $400 when I can get teh 1.4d for $150? I'm not a stickler for IQ, and inclined to think the marginal gains of the g are probably not worth it. also do I -have- to use the aperture ring on the d or will the camera (d850) be able to adjust it?
I'm getting into photography because I inherited two film cameras(Fed 4 and Nikon F301). While they are pretty cool and want to learn to shoot with them, film is very expensive where I live, so I'm mostly relegated to leaving them for special occasions, and wanted to get a digital camera to have everyday in order to practice especially with the controls. what are some models that have these features:Portable, must fit in a jacket pocketFull controls, especially if accessible with physical dials like in a film camera,Has to have manual focusAround $700 budget, may go up to 1kability to switch lenses is a positive but not required.I guess I'm stuck between mirrorless, premium point and shoots and rangefinders. From what I've been looking around I've found someone in my country selling a Fujifilm X100F for about 600, and I'm kinda tempted to get it
Can I nominate this as the best photo of any eclipse ever?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1179Image Height2556Scene Capture TypeStandard
in 2017 I took a photo of my penis with the eclipse but it didn't turn out very good because i was very cold
>>>posted 9 days agoDid jannies forget about /p/?
>>4307588This board moves almost as slowly as /gd/, janitors are busy putting out fires on /g/, a second there is like month here.
If you haven't had a film photo published in the 90s, you can never be trusted as a photographer and should be ignored.
>>4305130See, what you need to do is get a friend to stand a good 100 yards away with a superzoom to get some forced perspective and equalize the size between the sun and your dick
All Australian dollars:Leica M2 - $2.2k ishFuji 690 - $1.1k ishLenses - $3k ishOVF and other accessories - $300Photo books and art books - $1k ishAdd in hundreds for dev equipment, other misc stuff (not including film itself)
>>4307438Typo: the second Tamron lens is an 85mm f/1.8.
>>4306686Wow no one saw that coming
>>4307438>All this to take snapshits of my family and frens.based and loves their family and frens pilled.
>>4305078497 euros
Hi im working at a summer camp this summer and want to buy a new camera for it is the om system tough tg-7 a good choice In your opinion?
>>4303153Nope. I would recommend a cambo wide, graflex slxw, sinar handy, or if you're feeling fiesty a linhof master technika with a cammed rodenstock 105mm. Any one should be perfect for your use case.
>>43031531/2.3" is small and noisy.Lumix GX8 is cheaper and weather-sealed with dust and splash proof when paired with appropiate lenses and gives you more than decent quality photoshttps://www.m43lenses.com/
>>4305995Not one singe “weather sealed” camera, even pentax and nikon, comes close to the olympus toughALL weather sealing allows some water to enter. It just means your camera dies in years, not hours.
just use your phone
>>4303153i'll let you in on a secret anonsony rx0
